Smith & Wesson SW22 Victory

[Review] S&W SW22 Victory: Excellent .22 Pistol

Smith and Wesson has had a lot of experience with .22 LR autoloaders. Matter of fact, one of my recent reviews was about their M&P Compact .22. They make a lot of different models. Friend Duane has in his gun case a like-new Model 41 Target pistol with two barrels – one has a red dot mounted. Talk about the ultimate .22 LR pistol.

S&W model 41

Introduced in 1957 to the general public, this gun has been a mainstay of the bullseye circuit for decades. The company definitely has a way with rimfire pistols. They made a few other .22s over the intervening years.

In 2015, the company introduced the .22 Victory, model SW22. The gun was basically a shot across the bow of Ruger’s Mark series of guns. Until the Mark IV came out, one could take their Ruger rimfire pistol apart. No problem. But – getting it back together usually involved cursing, invectives, items thrown against the wall, jumping up & down… I exaggerate, but I remember my experience in this area. I have owned two Ruger rimfire “Marks” (the first, a Mark I, bought for me upon my leaving their high school in 1978 by an appreciative band – wouldn’t happen today!). I owned first this Mk. I and then a Mk. II 22/45. I took the first gun mentioned apart and had to have help getting it back together. I tried not to cuss but I knew all the words… it was an exercise in frustration. So, S&W brought out a rimfire that had one Allen-headed screw holding the upper slide assembly to the frame. Take that screw out and pop ‘em apart. Heck, go further aft on the barrel assembly and remove that second screw in order to replace the barrel…easy! Once you have the “top” off, slide the bolt out and clean away. That’s it. I have just given disassembly instructions. Reverse the process to put things back. Just make sure to keep that first screw tight.

Ruger replied with the Mk. IV, introduced one year after the Victory came out, in 2016. This gun upped the takedown ante by placing a button on the back of the receiver. Press this button and remove the bolt/barrel assembly. That’s it.

ruger mk IV
Ruger Mk. IV

And, the Ruger is a heck of a gun. So, the “Rimfire Takedown Wars” have taken yet another turn. Meanwhile, the Browning Buckmark still requires you to remove two screws to separate the upper assembly from the frame, 50% more than the Victory requires. I guess Browning’s not interested in playing the game. And – why should they be? I think they sell just about all the Buckmarks they can make. (Of course, these are not normal times – just about every gun manufacturer on the face of the earth is selling all they can make). At any rate, the shooter has some distinctive choices as to what flavor of .22 pistol he or she wants to buy.

browning buckmark

Browning Buckmark URX, one of 119 models shown on their website. I might have miscounted…my eyes went crossed after about number 91. I have never seen so many gun models on any single manufacturer’s website as I did here. Of course, some of those are listed as Discontinued, but they’re still there. What has this got to do with our Victory? This shows how deep the rimfire pistol market is. I did not count Ruger’s entries but rest assured, they’re in it for keeps as well. Bill Ruger’s very first gun was a .22 autoloading pistol, in 1949. So, we see that rimfire pistols are here to stay.

BONUS OFFER: Get your free shooting range targets to print at home!

Get your free targets to print at home!

Subscribe to our newsletter and get gun deals, educational content, hand's on reviews and news on law changes!

The Victory Vs. The “Marks”

First – the name Victory. Why Victory? I can’t be sure, but I’d bet S&W resurrected the “Victory” moniker for this pistol. That name had been applied to revolvers sent “across the pond” to Great Britain during WWII. The guns were the Model 10, in .38/200 for the Empire and .38 Special for our soldiers, Marines and sailors who used them. Many of their serial numbers began with “V”. Over 500,000 were made. I think it appropriate to re-use that appellation here – S&W is seeking a “victory” of sorts in the rimfire wars. This is one nice gun, to be sure.

Now – the “Marks” – as stated above, I’ve owned two of them. I find that the Victory differs from them in a few areas. Remember, these are strictly my opinion but it comes from decades of owning Rugers and my new experiences with the Victory.

Fit: I think the Victory fits my hand better than the Rugers did. The grip is a bit wider but allows the gun to settle down a bit lower for a higher grip than I could get on my Mk. I/II.

Accuracy: This is not a fair comparison, as I mounted a pistol red dot on the S&W but could not do so on the others. (At any rate, when the Mk. I was given to me, only Buck Rogers had such gizmos!). If we consider practical accuracy no matter how it’s achieved, the S&W wins. I could shoot the Mk. II pretty well, but without the gun fitting my hand totally, accuracy never was what it should’ve been. And, let’s face it – when I got the Mk. II, there were not that many brands of .22 pistols out there that I could afford. So I was limited to what was on dealer’s gun shelves in my price range.

Grips: The grips on both brands of guns are (were) similar to each other. The Ruger Mk. II tended to slip around in my hand more, however – I mentioned above that the S&W grip was a bit wider. This allows me to grab it, wrap my fingers around it and achieve a better overall hold than I could with the Rugers.

Weight: The Victory wins the weight war, if winning is decided by how heavy a gun is and how it “sits” in the hand. The S&W weighs 36 ounces, more than the lightweight MK IV but less than the Ruger Target Model version. I find that I can hold the 36-ounce weight a bit easier than the heavier 45 ounces of the Ruger Target model, and the Victory settles down in the hand easier than the 25 ounce weight of the Lite version Ruger. If the purpose of the Victory was simply plinking, 25 ounces would work but it is a target model and I appreciate its weight.

Magazines: Both company’s magazines are similar, with a pull-down loading button. The Ruger’s button was a bit larger and more comfortable to use. I’m still not sure why, if a gun the size of a Taurus TX-22 can use a 16-round magazine, why either S&W or Ruger provides only 10-round magazines with their rimfires. I get it, restrictive states, but Taurus provides both 10-round and 16-round, magazines depending on the state it’s shipped to. I just don’t get it.

Barrels: I owned the pencil-thin “Luger-ish” Mk. I and the bull-barreled Mk. II. I prefer the S&W 5.5-inch target barrel for three reasons: it seems to be more accurate (sights notwithstanding), it’s easily replaced, and it has a deep muzzle crown.

Sights: I prefer the S&W brighter fiber optic sights, but the Ruger’s black blades probably would lend themselves to more precision. They were true target sights. As for optics, the S&W makes it easy to add one – the rail to do so is in the box when you buy the gun. That’s one of the reasons I wanted the Smith.

We see that both pistols are excellent for their intended purposes – I just prefer the Victory. Let’s take a look at the specifications now…


Length:9.2 inches
Height:5.6 inches
Barrel:5.5 inches
Weight:36 ounces
Action:Single action, hammer-fired
Trigger Pull Weight:3 lbs, 12 oz. measured
Sights:Fully-adjustable rear, front post with fiber optic inserts
Capacity:Two 10-round magazines
Safeties:Thumb; magazine disconnect
Construction:Stainless steel, barrel/frame
Grips:Polymer, replaceable

SW22 Victory left side

SW22 Victory right side

Smith & Wesson SW22 Victory frame branding

SW22 Victory field stripped

Make sure to have the Allen key handy that it came with, or one of your own. Here’s the takedown screw:

SW22 Victory takedown screw

SW22 Victory rear sight
Rear sights.

Bright fiber optic pipes and adjustability ensure good visibility and precision.

SW22 Victory front sight
Front sights.
SW22 Victory mags
Two 10-round magazines, with easy-load pull-down buttons.

SW22 Victory mag disconnect

The one thing I don’t like – the magazine disconnect safety, silver bar above. It must be pushed up to allow the gun to fire. Never have been a fan of magazine disconnect safeties.

Picatinny rail rail of SW22
Picatinny rail and Allen key.

This one is polymer, which I’m OK with but if you want a steel one, they’re out there.

bolt underside of the SW22 Victory
Bolt, with visible recoil spring.

The manual says to not remove the spring for everyday cleaning.

SW22 Victory barrel takedown screw
The barrel release screw.

Just unscrew this second Allen-headed screw and the barrel slides off. Replace with a carbon fiber or other barrel for a custom experience.

BONUS OFFER: Get your free shooting range targets to print at home!

Get your free targets to print at home!

Subscribe to our newsletter and get gun deals, educational content, hand's on reviews and news on law changes!

Shooting The Victory

I tried different types of .22 LR ammo with my Victory. They included:

  • Federal Champion 40-grain RN
  • Winchester Super Speed 40-grain RN
  • Winchester DynaPoint 40-grain RN
  • Winchester 36-grain HP
  • CCI MiniMag 40-grain Target RN

All of the above shot well. I shot, at my back yard range, at 20 yards (first set of targets). All are 10 shots, except for the CCI which is 9. Here are the targets:

target Federal
Federal Champion
target win super speed
Winchester Super Speed
target win dyna point
Winchester DynaPoint

And, just for fun – a couple of 25-yard targets after I got the red dot sighted in.

victory win 36gr hp
Winchester 36-grain HP

…and, my best effort:

victory CCI minimag 40gr solid 25yds
CCI MiniMag 40 grain solid Target load.

Except for the flyer, I got what amounts to a one-hole group. This was my best target and speaks volumes for the accuracy of both the gun and load.

Wow. What can I say? Granted, I didn’t put all shots for each type of ammo into one hole, but for me, this ain’t bad. One of my goals for this Victory is to turn it into a squirrel gun. Looks like I’ve got a decent head start. Another point – velocities. I chronographed two of the loads, the Winchesters. I was pleasantly surprised at the velocities. The Super Speed went 1187 f.p.s., with the DynaPoint registering at 1201 f.p.s. I didn’t chrono the others – I’ve had experience with them in the past and have not been impressed with their velocities. It doesn’t matter – they are good plinking loads. It seems that this Victory barrel produces higher velocities than other .22 pistols or revolvers I’ve shot. That’s a good thing. I can’t wait to get into the woods with this rig and see what it will do. Sometimes, in order to get ready for small game, I’ll put tiny targets – an old ball, a clay pigeon – up at 50 yards and have at it. If I’m close, then I’m happy. This is one accurate gun.

One Small Glitch

I had mostly good experiences with the Victory, except for one area… I had numerous failures to eject. I couldn’t get through one magazine without one or two empties getting stuck. The empty case would either get caught in the upper chamber beside the new round or would stovepipe. I was concerned, so I turned to my gunsmith “expert” of sorts: YouTube. I found that this was common for new Victories and had an easy fix. I just bent the ejector toward the centerline a half-millimeter or so. I first went too far, and the bolt couldn’t open, so I pushed it back a bit. I then loaded 10 rounds in one of the magazines and proceeded to shoot all 10 as fast as I could pull the trigger. I haven’t had a hang-up since. Problem solved.

The Victory also has a magazine disconnect safety. I am not a fan of those. It is easily remedied, but I’m not about to tell you how to defeat a factory safety feature – you’re on your own for that one.

To Red Dot Or Not To Red Dot?

As you can tell from the photos above, this gun comes with some excellent iron (open) sights. Fiber optic all around, the rear is adjustable and the front is a darker green for contrast. I have to admit, though, that I bought the Pinty red dot (and green dot – it does both, with 5 levels of intensity and different reticles) specifically for this gun, before I had it as I knew I was going to get it, so I went ahead with the optic.

SW22 Victory on bag

Why would I take a perfectly-good, adjustable fiber optic rear sight off a brand new gun and replace it with an inexpensive red dot? Because getting old is making it harder to focus on three sight planes at once. The open sights require you to line up the front sight with the target with whatever hold you’re using and then center it all in the rear sight, concentrating on the front sight. I know, this is how you shoot most handguns and quite a few rifles and I’ve done this for over 40 years. But… my eyes now have glasses sitting in front of them most all the time and it’s hard for me to line up the gun and targets with progressive trifocals. Hence – the red dot. As those of you who use red dots know, all you have to do is spot the target and stick the dot on the place you want the bullet to go, once it’s sighted in for that gun. One sight plane – easy peasy. But – I found out that it aided my accuracy but didn’t guarantee it as the dot can wiggle around on the target. Good, old-fashioned marksmanship habits are still required. I am in the process of obtaining other sights (including lasers) to test and will hopefully write about them in due course but suffice it to say that this cheapie red dot really enhances my practical accuracy.

The gun itself is a dream to shoot. Weighing in at 36 ounces, this is no lightweight. Weighing almost as much as a full-size 1911 (but with a bit of a steeper grip angle), it sits well in the hand. The bull barrel helps pull the balance a bit to the front and it holds on target fairly easily. The trigger was not bad. Of course, there are aftermarket triggers that you can get for the gun but I am happy with the one on it.

Speaking of aftermarket parts, there is a whole cottage industry growing up around this pistol. I guess that before S&W brought the gun out on the market, they took it to Volquartsen, who started producing aftermarket barrels, etc. for it. Another company big into Victory parts is Tandemkross. Triggers, charging handles, grips – there’s no excuse for not “fixing up” your new range toy!


I surely think you could do worse than the Victory, if you are looking for a decent .22 pistol that won’t break the bank. For a full list price of $416, you get a gun that performs well, is very accurate, easy to take down and that has a myriad of after-market bits & pieces that enhance it further. Factor in a real-world price of around $380 and you have a winner. Even given the fact that I had to bend the ejector a bit, I still think it’s a good buy. When I look at that CCI MiniMag group above, I’m encouraged both by the gun’s accuracy and my shooting with it. As we know, confidence in your gun and your ability to shoot it well is half the battle. If you’ve read many of my reviews, you might look at some of my targets and wonder what shotgun I was using. At least the Victory and its red dot helped me out here.

So, if you want a decent .22 pistol and are not locked into the Ruger or Browning camps, give the Victory a look – I think you’ll be glad you did. If you have one of these, feel free to chime in below with a comment. As always, keep ‘em in the black and stay safe!

  1. Great review Mike, and they do have the Hammer Strut Support that makes disassembly/reassembly much easier for the Ruger Mks I-III.

    1. Honu, true, but I was just going with the stock Mk I/II guns I had experience with. The newest Ruger is the easiest yet to take down, but I just like the way the Victory feels in my hand and its accuracy. I appreciate your comment-thanks for writing.

  2. Hi Mike,
    Been a while and I have meant to write but various things in Real life take precedence as you well know and understand (HOPEFULLY that is)

    First a bit of history, My Dad had an old .22 revolver that was well not top of the line and it was double action and loaded through a side gate. Double action was HORRIBLE to say the least but Single action was EXCELLENT!
    I forget how old I was ..maybe 10-11 or so and were checking some “bush hooks” and I was in the bow of a 14ft boat and managed to get his attention and was not moving. There was a Moccasin/Cottonmouth a few feet away from hand. Dad said Don’t Move….Of course I wasn’t moving.. He fired and took the head off the snake….
    That pistol was his tackle box gun.
    Years later I got a Ruger Single Six Convertible with a .22 Mag. Cylinder. 4 or a 4.5 inch barrel.
    Years Later I bought a Ruger .22/45 Mk-III. I could not ask for a bitter fit for my hand.

    A friend asked to borrow it for a couple of days and brought it back with a fiber optic front site on it and several spare tubes of various colors to choose from and the tool to change them out/replace them. I LOVED the new sites and could not ask for better at the time!

    Then Disaster Struck….. I took it apart to clean it….And as you said above….and I must admit before that it would make a GREAT part of survival gear with extra magazines and several boxes of ammo (a couple (or maybe more) of those 100 round plastic boxes all would make an awesome kit.

    After disassembly and a good proper cleaning and light oil and wiped down I was ready to reassemble it.. Them MISTER MURPHY paid me a visit and stuck around for several days.

    I was NOT a “Happy Camper”. A friend came over that had bought a regular Mk-III and finally got it back together..

    I have been considering getting a Mk-IV or something else but that is still being thought out….

    As for this S&W I don’t really care for it and it has nothing to do with preferring Rugers..

    As for a target/plinker/hunter .22 it looks and should be great firearm for that!

    What I DON’T LIKE about it is that it needs a “special” tool for disassembly/reassembly. the tool is small and could be easily lost Especially in a Survival situation.,

    That is something that is most important in my opinion. While I have not handled the Ruger Mk-IV and cannot say anything good or bad about it.

    In general I won’t buy a firearm that needs a special tool to disassemble/reassemble that can be lost. That reason should be obvious because if or once you lose or misplace that tool you are
    pretty much screwed and not in a good way and will not be kissed or given flowers or a box of chocolate!

    While yes there is no doubt of my love of Rugers I will happily consider something else as long as it does not require a tool for taking it apart and putting it back together.

    That being said I also do not care for the magazine safety where the Magazine must be in the weapon to fire….another Mark AGAINST the Ruger 22/45.

    I am also considering a ,22 LR conversion kit for my 1911 so it is 2 guns in one and no tools are needed.

    There are also other caliber conversion kits available for the 1911 and the Glocks and perhaps
    other but that is a different matter for another time

    Keep up the writing!

    1. Bingo, sounds like that boat trip was a bit more exciting than you were counting on – glad it ended well( (well, for you at any rate – the snake might disagree). I also am with you on having to have tools to take guns down, or if they use loose pins that could get lost. I bought this Victory for a backyard plinker/hunter, and I usually have Allen wrenches handy so it isn’t a deal for me. Ruger’s latest .22 pistol would be great in the takedown department, but their LCRs/ECRs/Security 9 all have loose takedown pins. Wish they could adapt the pinless takedown that the Mk. IV has into the rest of their line. Anyway, thanks again for writing!

  3. I hated the way the Victory felt in my hand and i do not like the looks of it, for what it is worth. There was definitely no taking a liking to this gun.

    1. Just Me, I truly get it – everyone’s different. I’ve picked up guns that absolutely did not fit my hand or that I didn’t like for other reasons. No problem with you not liking it – there are way too many others out there that you might like. Thanks for writing!

  4. I forgot to add that my 22/45 also came with a rail to attach an optical site.

    I am sort of borderline when it comes to optical sites….I do have a red dot site a friend gave me….the only thing I don’t like about it, is that it is a 4 MOA….Cheap Holograph or Red Dot sites I question the MOA of them and how they will stand up to recoil.
    Obviously recoil is not much of an issue or concern on a .22 LR.

    The results of your shooting with a lesser expensive one on the .22 LR prove they are good enough for a .22 LR. or even a pellet rifle but what about larger calibers or on AR or other rifle platforms?

    Apologies for going off topic, but you got me to wondering about them. Look at the price of an ACOG…..I mean I would not want to put an ACOG on a .22LR handgun. But if I want an optical or Red Dot site on a rifle I certainly want much better than a 4 MOA. I also want to know what is reasonable MOA to expect from it at realistic prices and not going into several Hundred $$$.

    1. Bingo, yeah, a 4MOA dot can cover a lot of target at longer ranges. Usually, a 2- or 3 MOA dot is better. For my purposes, this dot is fine. The dot on my cheap red dot is definitely minute-of-squirrel’s at 30 or 35 yards. I have read that some folks have put the sight I have on an AR, but I’m with you – I think something a bit heavier duty might work better, or longer. Thanks for writing again.

  5. Hi Mike thanks for the article, I have Ruger MK IV the frist 22 I have ever owned, as you said the take down to clean is under 10 seconds , I think it’s time to give the Victory another look can’t have to many 22s. Have good week be safe.

    1. Marc, glad you like your Ruger. I enjoyed mine, but always felt they just didn’t fit right. Check out a Victory – as you say, you can’t have too many .22s! Thanks for writing.

  6. Another great review Mike. Like I’ve mentioned in earlier comments on .22 reviews. It’s doubtful I’ll pick one up, but I still enjoy reading the reviews. My only complaint about the Walther P22 Target I own, is it’s takedown. A pain in the patootie at home to maintenance, and nearly impossible in the field.

    Keep up your excellent work. Very much a pleasure to read.

    1. Bemused, I really appreciate hearing from you. I feel we might have a lot in common! Thanks for the comments – keep them coming!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts
Heckler & Koch HK416
Read More

HK 416 Pistol Review: H&K’s Magnificent Rimfire

In this Article: The HK 416 PistolThe Heckler & Koch CompanyHK 416 Pistol PhotosShooting the HK 416 PistolWrap Up Some of you gun enthusiasts might be familiar with Heckler and Koch‘s (HK) line of firearms. The company is known for its high-quality, innovative designs that are used by militaries and law enforcement agencies all over ... Read more

Talk to me

Hi! I'm Mike, one of the oldest writer of Sniper Country! If you have any feedback or question about my articles, please submit it here, it's always appreciated!

[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]

Claim your targets for free (worth $99)!

Join 212,000 avid gun enthusiasts and claim your print-at-home shooting drills. Receive exclusive gun deals once a week and all our great reviews right in your inbox.