It weighs 55 ounces. And yet, this is still about half a pound less than a Raging Bull. The Taurus Raging Hunter was also American Hunter Magazine’s 2019 Hunting Handgun of the Year.

It has all the qualities that hunting revolver aficionados look for in a pistol, including a modern design, solid construction, and a reasonable price. Let’s find out in this review its actual features, and performance, and find out if it’s the right gun for you.

Before we get too far into the features of this gun, let’s look at its specifications.

Taurus Raging Hunter Specs

Taurus Raging Hunter Features

This gun incorporates the best features of top-quality double-action revolvers, then adds a couple of features not usually seen on standard revolvers. Here’s a list of features, with photos to illustrate.

Dual Cylinder Latch

The .44 Magnum cartridge can generate some wrist-thumping pressures. Taurus borrowed a feature from their Raging Hunter revolver in its top-pressure chamberings. It also has a latch for the cylinder not only at the back, as is usual, but at the front of the cylinder as well.

But this really is nothing new — I had an original Dan Wesson Model 15 back in the early 1980s that used a front latch. It does help keep the cylinder shut and latched when shooting high-pressure loads, so this is a good thing.

Vented Barrel

There are four vents on each side. These holes direct gases outward and upward, thereby helping push the muzzle down during recoil. This goes a long way to help alleviate muzzle jump.

And, speaking of muzzle jump, you definitely want to keep away from the hammer spur when shooting .44 Magnum loads. I saw a guy plant the hammer spur from a S&W .44 magnum in his forehead when he wouldn’t move his head further back when we warned him, away from the scope that was mounted on the revolver.

The .44 generates some pretty good recoil (about 18.5 ft/lbs of recoil energy), but these vents help. And, in case you’re thinking that 18.5 ft/lbs of recoil energy is nothing, bear in mind that the .243 Winchester only generates 9 ft/lbs out of a 7-pound rifle. Another point about shooting the Taurus is to wear good hearing protection. The vents do tend to increase the blast.

Picatinny-Compatible Rail

This versatile rail allows the mounting of a scope, red dot sight, or laser. With 13 slots, you can place your sight close to your eye or further away. Another point: you usually don’t see a long Picatinny-style rail on revolvers. If they have one at all, it is usually short. This one is long enough to be useful.

Popular Articles

Smith & Wesson SD9 VE: Hands-On Review

DPMS LR-308 Review: Modern AR Basics

Best 9mm Ammo in 2024 for Self-Defense & Targets

Best Concealed Carry Insurance in 2024

9mm Glock Models [Ultimate Guide]

Handgun Caliber Chart [2025 Ultimate Guide]

Rifle Calibers [Ultimate Guide]

Recoil-Absorbing Grip

The Raging Hunter (and other hard-kicking Taurus revolvers) use this grip (taken from the Taurus website): GRIP RUBBER RED 454,444,45, 22 HORNET

The black, rubbery finger-groove-molded grip allows for a firm engagement with your fingers and hand, while the red strip is harder and helps to soak up recoil. As it says above, they put this grip on their large, .44 Magnum and .454 caliber revolvers. It must work or they would have changed it out by now, yet, this has been around a while.

Transfer Bar

If you look closely at the older S&W Model 29 above, you’ll notice that the firing pin is attached to the hammer. Taurus doesn’t do that with this gun. The firing pin is frame-mounted and is on;y struck by the hammer’s force when the trigger is pulled and the transfer bar is in place to transfer the hammer’s energy to the firing pin. Aptly named, for sure.

Good Sights

The front sight is pinned. Let’s look at that photo again of the barrel vents, only this time we’ll look at the sight.

Notice the pin under the sight. This is good — you could conceivably change it out for a taller one. I couldn’t find that to be the case in my research, but in my experience anytime you see a pin below a front sight on a handgun, that says that the sight is removable and possibly replaceable.

If I owned this gun, I might change it out to some sort of night sight — that would help it stand out against the black rear sight.

The rear has a good, square notch set into an adjustable housing. (I’m not sure how all that oil got on there — I hadn’t shot it yet when these photos were taken. I like to keep my shootin’ irons clean. Probably whoever reviewed this gun before I got it put that oil there).

The adjustments are about as plain as day. No special tool or tiny jeweler’s screwdriver — just a plain flat-blade screwdriver will adjust your rear sight. My only concern is that the sight is very old-school black-rear-black-front, like target guns. I tend to paint front sights a bright orange and outline rear sight notches on other guns I own in order to make them more visible to my aging eyes.

This is doubly important on a hunting gun, where shots will more than likely be taken in dim lighting conditions. Whether dawn has just dawned or the sun is fading fast in the evening, most deer that I have taken have been in not-so-great lighting conditions. But you can always stick a red dot sight on one of the 13-barrel rail slots.

Cylinder Wall Thickness

My beloved 629 has a cylinder with walls that aren’t so thick. I’ve always heard to keep the 29/ 629’s loads under the maximum because the cylinder wasn’t that sturdy and the single latch could be problematic.

Whether that’s true or not (I have shot many wrist-thumpers through this gun), I like moderate-level loads anyway, so that’s not an issue. The cylinder on this Raging Hunter, though, is a different one. Look how beefy the cylinder is:

Not bad at all. And, while we’re looking at the cylinder, look at the star on the rear of the cylinder — pretty well-built here, too.

Two-Part Barrel Assembly

The barrel on a Raging Hunter is, unlike that on a Raging Bull, a two-piece affair. The actual barrel is screwed into the frame and then the barrel shroud is affixed to the front of the barrel, a la Dan Wesson except the barrel is not replaceable by normal mortal humans unless you work for Taurus. This saves weight as the Raging Bull weighs about a half pound more than the Raging Hunter, and most all of that is in the barrel. Here’s the muzzle:

These are the areas that I think Taurus did a really good job when designing the Raging Hunter. It truly is a very good revolver for its intended purpose. The nice part is that they make it simple to add a sight by putting a really long section of rail on the barrel shroud.

They even considered the hunting environment in terms of finish. Whereas the Raging Hunter could be had in an all-stainless, fairly shiny finish, the Hunter is matte black with a stainless frame (or black) and barrel. This makes it pretty invisible in the field.

The finish is a very flat, utilitarian black that you wouldn’t mind taking to your deer stand and bumping around. It should be fairly simple to touch up. Look at the photos above and examine the finish. I do think this beats a very shiny coat.

Here are a couple of shots of the barrel and frame engraving…

Shooting the Taurus Raging Hunter

I couldn’t wait to get to my shooting bench in the back yard, but I had to exhibit patience. We had a cold front move through right after I picked this gun up from Duane’s shop and it was nine degrees for a few nights with attendant cold days.

I am used to shooting a long-barreled .44, given that mine has the 8 3/8-inch barrel so this won’t be anything new. It will be different, though, and I am looking forward to being on the bench with this beast. I’m hoping the extra weight (55 ounces vs. my 629’s 49.5) and the porting help tame recoil to a considerable degree.

After scraping a few inches of snow off my shooting bench, I finally got to shoot this gun. I wanted to try it with one of my hunting loads — a 260-grain, hard-cast semi-wadcutter over 6.5 grains of Tite Group. This load has been a consistent performer on deer. It’s not a “pedal-to-the-metal” type of load. It chronographed at 1080 fps out of the Raging Hunter, long barrel, but it hits with authority.

Shooting the Raging Hunter produces 680 ft/lbs of energy, which is more than enough to put a deer down this side of 100 yards or so. Over the 30 or so years that I’ve hunted with my long-barreled 629, I’ve found that I didn’t need a heavy, hard-cast bullet moving at 1300 f.p.s. to put a deer down for good. Also, a velocity between 1000 and 1100 fps works just as well and is easier on the shooter and the gun.

This is not exactly a 100-yard load in terms of accuracy, as the target shows, but around 50-75 yards it will work. Also, this is just one of a few loads that I put together to hunt with. Others would probably print differently on the paper.

This was the first time I shot this gun, and that can have a bearing on accuracy. When I have the chance, I’ll try it with my other loads. I just needed a quick photo, hence this target. After putting several dozen more rounds down range, it will be dialed in and ready for the hunt. If I connect with the gun, I’ll edit this piece to reflect that and post photos.

Taurus Raging Hunter Review: Shooting Performance

The Taurus Raging Hunter shot very well. For recoil, it was like I was shooting a lighter-bullet, slower load. Heavy bullets tend, with all else being equal, to generate more recoil than lighter bullets. This bullet, from an older Lee mold, casts right around 260 grains as I pointed out above.

The barrel ports really helped tame the muzzle flip. But to be honest, a 55-ounce revolver putting a 260-grain bullet out of its muzzle at 1085 fps won’t have a whole lot of muzzle flip, to begin with. Out of my 49.5-ounce 629, it is more pronounced.

Muzzle-Heavy

This gun is a bit muzzle-heavy, what with the full-length underlug and the rail on top. That really helps tame recoil. I did not notice any torque when I pulled the trigger. But sometimes, heavy-bullet loads will twist the gun in your hand, yet I didn’t experience any of that.

As for the muzzle blast, with the hearing protectors in place, I didn’t notice an increased blast. (Yes, I can tell the difference between different loads’ levels of noise with muffs on. I couldn’t tell a difference here). The gun was a pleasure to shoot and would be welcome in a deer blind.

Taurus Raging Hunter: Wrap Up

I guess an 8 3/8-inch-barreled .44 Magnum is no stranger to me, but even so, I was anxious to see how it compared to my S&W 629. The gun was specifically made for hunting, to be sure, and the big plus is the finish as it’s available in stainless steel, barrel, and all. The Hunter has an optional stainless frame (the one I had), but barrels are only available in black (as of this writing).

About the only thing I might change would be the sights — not the way they operate, just their visibility. Many handgun hunters don’t want to put an optic on their favorite revolver for several reasons, so maybe the iron sights that come on the gun could be a bit more visible. A front tritium sight would help the shooter acquire it more quickly in the dim light of most hunting conditions.

I can vouch for the adjustability of the rear sight. The gun was shooting high (shot the metal-rod arm off a target stand), so I got my decades-old little Smith & Wesson screwdriver that came with some revolver I’d owned over the years and screwed the sight down a few turns.

The shots printed just where I wanted them to — a bit high at 25 yards. That way, they’re just a touch high at 50 and just about right on at 75. (I know, there are many ballistics trajectory calculators out there, but for an open-sighted .44 Magnum throwing great big gobs of lead downrange, it will be close enough. I’ve shot these loads long enough to know where they will hit at different yardages.

All in all, it’s a great gun for the deer woods. I can’t help but think Elmer Keith would be proud. As always, go shooting and stay safe.

You might also like to read:

• Taurus PT1911 Review: A Great Way To Own A Legend
• Best .44 Magnum Revolvers: Ultimate Guide
• Glock 23: The Compact .40 S&W