In this day and age of polymer-framed striker-fired semiautos, does the old-fashioned revolver even have a place? Many of you reading this may think not but I beg to differ. There’s something to be said for a carry weapon that just needs to be drawn (or shot through the pocket, hidden) and fired just by pulling the trigger. No safeties. No wondering if you remembered to load the chamber. No worries about a magazine not seated properly. Just pull-and-bang.
Ok, I oversimplify but you get the idea. To be fair, there are many semiautos that function pretty much like revolvers…draw-aim-fire. However, the comments about the chamber being loaded and the magazine seated still are valid. According to many shooters, there are more ways for a semiauto not to fire when you pull the trigger than a revolver. The state-of-the-art self-loader is remarkably reliable but there are still thousands of shooters out there who trust their life to a revolver. Call them old-fashioned or whatever, but a lot of folks only carry revolvers. I’m good either way.
Let’s look at some considerations, definitions, and other factors related to carrying a revolver and then we’ll look at some guns.
Definition Of A Concealed Carry Revolver
What criteria will I use to define a concealed carry revolver?
It’s pretty simple, actually. The carry revolver will usually have a four-inch or shorter barrel. Two other features that help define a carry gun are the grip and frame. Most carry revolvers have a round-butt, abbreviated grip and a smaller frame that conceals well. Hogue-type rubber grips tend to be common, although some of the more expensive custom guns may have grips made from an exotic wood. Crimson Trace or other laser sights are popular as well. Most snubbies are chambered in .38 Special, with .357 Magnum and .44 Special made in lesser numbers. There are even guns chambered in 9mm and .45 ACP but these are not in the mainstream of snub nose revolver calibers due to the fact that these rimless cartridges need special consideration in a revolver cylinder to function properly.
Barrel Length, Cylinder Width and Concealability
I know that for a certain segment of shooters, a four-inch Smith and Wesson Model 19 or some similar gun in .357 Magnum or .38 Special is the preferred revolver carry choice. Guns with that barrel length, with their longer barrels’ greater velocity and increased sight radius, can make excellent concealed carry guns. The problem is concealing it. A four-inch barrel is harder to hide than a two-incher, especially inside the waistband.
The cylinder, being the widest part of a revolver, is usually the hardest part of the gun to hide and this dimension usually is independent of barrel length. A four-inch revolver’s cylinder width is, by and large, the same width as that of a similar-caliber two-inch gun’s cylinder. Most folks I know who carry a four-inch revolver carry it outside the waistband under a coat or garment. Inside the waistband carry is a little more difficult because of the cylinder width coupled with barrel length but it can be done. If you carry a larger revolver, great – I’m glad that it works for you.
However, for our purposes here I will limit the discussion to those guns that are commonly referred to as snub nosed revolvers. These are guns with a two- to three-inch barrel, give or take a little and a total width across the cylinder of around 1.4 inches or less. That takes in many guns and models, but we will try to narrow it down to ten specific guns. Another point I need to mention: unlike my comparisons of semiauto pistols, I won’t be listing a specification table of length, width, capacity, etc. for each gun. I will mention important facts about the guns but when we look at the overall classification of revolvers known as snub nose (or snubbies), dimensions tend to be pretty close. I will point out the differences, to be sure.
Cylinder Width Vs. Semiauto Width
We’ve settled on a cylinder width of around 1.4 inches as part of our definition of a carry revolver. But is there anything special about that number, when several very popular semiautos are the same width, thereabouts? What makes the snubbie harder to conceal when both are close to the same width?
There is a reason that the revolver might be a little harder to conceal even if it is the same width as a semiauto. The revolver is only that wide at the cylinder…the rest of the gun is flat. This can make the gun print easier, especially in a thin pocket holster. Some people will see the cylinder’s bulge and immediately “make” you as carrying a gun, because that’s what guns look like, right? Those same people might see a flat bulge in your pocket and not think a thing about it and not recognize it as a semiauto hidden there in a pocket holster. The reason is that the semiauto is pretty much the same width all over, much like a cell phone. That is the difference between the two. From my personal experience, when I carry my Smith & Wesson Model 638 J-frame snubby, I get the “cylinder bulge” that I have to hide. When I carry a Ruger LC9S in its pocket holster, it looks like I have a large cell phone there. Only you can make the decision whether to carry a revolver or not – everyone’s different. One way that works for some people to carry a wheel gun is to put it in a shoulder holster. If you are wearing a jacket or other cover garment, the shoulder holster may be a viable way to have your gun with you, because the cylinder “bulge” won’t show.
Capacity and Reloading
Most compact or subcompact pistols hold anywhere from six to fifteen or more rounds in a magazine. To reload, you hit the magazine release button, the empty magazine falls free and you stick a fresh, full magazine in the gun and release the slide. You now have that many rounds at the ready again.
The revolver is a bit different in the capacity and reloading department. Unless you are carrying a larger seven- or eight-shot revolver, most of the smaller, easily-concealed carry guns will hold five or six rounds in the cylinder. Once you’ve fired all of them, you press the cylinder release button, swing the cylinder out, punch out the empty cases and refill the chambers. There are speed loaders and speed strips that do help charge all chambers simultaneously or two at a time, but (unless you’ve really dedicated a lot of training time to the task of reloading) it’s not going to be as fast as slapping in a fresh magazine. Please understand – I’m talking about the average Mr. or Ms. Concealed Carrier, not a competition shooter like Jerry Miculek. He can reload his wheel gun faster than most of us can reload our semiauto. For the majority of us, a semiauto is going to be faster to reload.
Let’s Balance It Out
OK…so we know that the revolver might be a little harder to conceal and maybe a touch slower to reload. Does it have any advantages?
It sure does. Put yourself in this imaginary scenario: you are waiting in line at the bank when an obviously-deranged shooter comes in and starts firing wildly at people. You put your hand on your snubbie in your jacket pocket just as he turns toward you. No time to draw! With a revolver, you shoot him through your jacket pocket without ever pulling the gun out. You just saved your own and probably several others’ lives. This is a bit far-fetched but there have been occasions when a legally-armed concealed carrier has had to shoot through a jacket, coat, purse, etc. A revolver can do that, especially those with an internal or shrouded hammer. You might get one shot off with a semiauto but chances are the slide will get hung up in recoil in your pocket/purse etc., rendering it useless if more than one shot is needed.
Another advantage that is not readily obvious is that the manual of arms tends to a little less complicated for the revolver. I have discovered it is a bit easier to introduce a shooter to the sport when I use one of my revolvers with reduced loads, or a .22. When I have handed them a semiauto first, some of them all but handed it back saying that it looked too complicated. Don’t get me wrong – anyone can be taught to shoot anything, given enough range time and training. I make no judgement calls because of this – I own and shoot many semiauto pistols – this is simply what I have observed in my limited experience.
Here’s where that longer-barreled revolver comes in handy, because there is one caution about handing a snub nose revolver to a new shooter. Until a shooter attains a certain level of proficiency, a snubbie is a very difficult gun to master.
The snub nose should be introduced to the new shooter only after he/she is familiar with the trigger, sight picture and recoil generated by the longer-barreled gun. Once those are mastered, then hand him/her the snubbie with standard- or target-pressure loads and let them shoot, shoot, shoot. Gradually they will work up to defense-level ammo. I specifically avoid any type of .357-level loads, even if the gun is made for them. As much as I have shot revolvers over the years (including a lot of full-bore .44 Magnum handloads), I hesitate to shoot .357 Magnum loads through a two or two-and-a-half inch-barreled snubbie. I’ve heard the sensation created by recoil is equated to getting one’s palm whacked with a 2X4. I concur. So, keep the loads on the low side and you’ll have a shooter for life. Stick with .38 Special loads for practice and +P loads for self defense. Here’s where handloading is advantageous – you can tailor the load to the gun. The take-away for this is to not turn off a new shooter, but to encourage them by them getting hits on targets and having fun. Later, they can venture into .357 territory if they desire to do so.
.357 Magnum In A Two-Inch Revolver?
To have the power of the .357 Magnum cartridge at your disposal in a gun that you could just about carry in your pocket is tempting. Be advised, however, that shooting full-bore .357 loads in a 23-ounce snubbie is not a fun experience unless you’re the type of person who enjoys having the palm of your hand whacked with a baseball bat.
Most snubbie .357 guns are carried with .38 Special +P ammo. Is it worth carrying .357 Magnums in a two-inch-barreled gun that can’t take advantage of magnum ballistics in such a short barrel?
Possibly, but don’t be under the assumption that, just because it says “.357 Magnum” on the box of ammo, you are getting ballistics similar to those gotten from a longer barrel. Obviously, it’s not going to be the velocity you’d get if you shot the .357s out of a six-inch-barreled gun, but even a 100 fps gain is worthwhile. A lot of folks who carry short-barreled .357s practice with .38 Special ammo and save the palm-whacker .357 ammo for carry. That won’t happen, but you should notice some gain. One practice method has the shooter at the range with both types of ammo. The majority of the rounds fired are lower-pressure Special ammo, with a few cylinders of magnum loads touched off at the end of the session to know where they will print on the target and to acclimate yourself to the recoil. As long as you practice with your carry load at regular intervals (only you can decide what constitutes “regular”), you should be OK.
Fire It Single or Double Action?
This topic arises with any snub nose revolver that has an exposed hammer spur and is capable of single action fire. Do you thumb-cock the hammer and fire the gun in single action mode or just pull the trigger and shoot it double action-style?
I own a laser-equipped S&W Model 638, which is a 1.87-inch-barreled, 5-shot .38 Special with a shroud that covers all but the tip of the hammer spur so I can cock the hammer for a light single action shot if needed. Some think this gun to be the best of both worlds because you can fire it two ways. You can draw the gun without fear that the hammer spur will snag on something since it’s mostly covered and then fire it just by pulling the trigger (double action). Or, you can fire it as described above by thumbing the hammer spur back to cock it and then fire it single action with its attendant lighter trigger pull. Most trainers who train folks to use revolvers for defense will only allow them to shoot double action with no manually cocking of the hammer. This has been accepted practice for decades due to the rapidity with which the shooter can get the gun into action and score hits on the target by not having to pause to manually cock the hammer. In this style, one is trained to push the gun through to the target, quickly line the sights up on the target and then pull the trigger smoothly to fire the gun.
Shooting at a distance
The one question that inevitably arises involves shooting at distance…what if you would have to take an aimed shot at a target more than a few feet away?
Here is where a short, light single action trigger pull is desirable. Unless you are trained to fire double action only, this is achieved by cocking the hammer manually to allow for that lighter, smoother pull. Chances are this is not going to happen, but some folks like to be prepared for almost any eventuality.
Anyway, the best-selling snubbie from S&W is the Model 642, the gun with its hammer enclosed inside the frame that can only be fired double action by pulling the trigger. This tells us that most buyers of these guns don’t want the ability to manually cock the hammer. Some tend to “stage” the trigger pull by pulling it partially back until they feel a certain resistance. Then they hold the trigger as they do a final sight alignment and only then pull it the rest of the way, firing the gun. This would only happen if they had time for a deliberate, aimed shot. So, there is more than one way to “cock” a double action snubbie – either by manually pulling the hammer back or by staging the trigger pull.
OK…we’ve had enough theory and background. Now let’s look at guns. I will do this a bit differently than I have done in the past. I will list manufacturers and then look at specific guns made by them that fit our criteria.
We will look at guns from (in alphabetical order) Charter Arms, Colt, Kimber, Rossi, Ruger, Smith & Wesson and Taurus. All of these manufacturers make guns that are made to carry concealed. Here are the guns we will examine:
|Ruger||LCR/LCRx & SP101|
|Smith & Wesson||M&P Bodyguard .38 & 638/642 J-Frame Revolvers|
The Kimber, Rossi and the Ruger SP101 are chambered in .357 Magnum but are equally at home shooting .38 Specials, which are easier on the both the gun and the hand. Below are some of the more popular concealed carry revolvers. Any of them would suffice in a self-protection role. We’ll look at the companies listed above and then see what they have to offer.
Charter Arms Undercover and Bulldog
The Charter Arms company has been through some changes over the years, some better than others, but now they are on solid footing and are putting out very decent guns at affordable prices. I have had experience with both of the revolvers mentioned here so I can recommend them without hesitation. Let’s look at two of the most popular snub nosed revolvers they sell.
This gun, chambered in .38 Special, is probably the best-selling gun Charter Arms makes. It was their first product, introduced in 1964. The gun’s design was novel – it used no frame side plate, which in theory made it stronger. Produced in several calibers, the .38 is its most popular chambering. The gun uses the fairly-standard two-inch barrel and comes in different finishes. Most usually attired in rubber Hogue-type finger-groove grips, the Undercover can be had with or without a hammer spur, in stainless, in blue, in nitride…the choices are many. At last count, the Charter Arms website showed no fewer than ten models in the Undercover line, ranging in price (MSRP) from $352 – $462. You can get one with Old Glory emblazoned on it, or one with Crimson trace grips if desired. What this all boils down to is that, for a real-world price of a little over $300, you can have a dependable carry .38. You can’t ask for much more than that.
Now we’re talking – a .44 Special, 5-shot snubbie. I owned one of these back in the 1970s. The gun itself made headlines across the country in 1976-1977 when David Berkowitz, alias the Son of Sam, killed eight people with one chambered in .44 Special.
At that time, I just happened to own the same model Bulldog that I carried a lot. It went with me when I rode my motorcycle, hidden on my belt and out of the way. The gun was eminently concealable. Charter Arms still makes that 1970s blued version with the unshrouded ejector rod and wooden grips but I believe they sell more of the stainless models with the full-length ejector rod shroud and rubber grips. There are eleven models of .44 Bulldogs on Charter’s website, ranging in price from $409 to $1595 for a commemorative Heller edition. You can get one with factory Crimson Trace grips for the MSRP of $690, but most of the mainline blue or stainless Bulldogs tend to sell for around $400 at your local shop, give or take a little.
I shot the heck out of mine with my .44 Special reloads, and would not hesitate for a minute to carry one again. Their 2.5” barrels are plenty long enough to give that big .44 bullet a good push, but if you want more, get the four-inch target version with adjustable rear sight for $475 (MSRP). That would make a great woods-walkin’ gun, for sure! I loaded some plastic snake shot containers from Speer with #9 shot for mine; with a couple of those and three hard-hitting cast flat-nose bullets, you are ready for about anything in the woods. Check these guns out – you might like the idea of a .44-caliber carry gun. There is an abundance of modern .44 Special defense loads out now to accompany your Bulldog.
Colt has recently gotten back into the double-action revolver game with its re-introduction of the Cobra, a six-shot .38 Special. Made from 1950 – 1981, the Cobra was based on the famous Detective Special snubbie Colt first made in 1927. The D.S. was made with a steel frame; the Cobra used an aluminum lightweight frame. The Cobra was given a facelift in 1971, with a fully-shrouded ejector rod, a ramped front sight and very nice wood target-style grips. Wishes, wishes…I wish I had mine back. I had one of these snazzy-looking snubbies and for some unknown reason traded it. They were the Cadillac of snub-nosed revolvers at that time. The new one is no exception.
The New Cobra
The new Cobra is, like its predecessor, a six-shot snubbie with a two-inch barrel. Unlike the earlier Cobra, the new one is built from stainless steel, not aluminum. Colt uses a leaf spring instead of the coiled spring that Smith and Wesson (and others) uses. The LL2 (linear leaf) spring produces a double-action trigger pull of around 7-9 pounds and a single-action weight of 3-4 pounds without stacking.
That alone helps in the accuracy department because you don’t have to “fight” the trigger, pulling the sights off target. Wearing a red fiber optic front sight and a deep muzzle crown, this new Cobra is a shooter. It weighs in at 25 ounces, which really helps soak up the recoil of the +P loads it is rated to shoot. Equipped with Colt-branded Hogue overmolded rubber grips with finger grooves, whatever recoil that is generated is soaked up pretty well.
Another feature that helps keep the Cobra from firing unless the trigger is pulled is the transfer bar. The hammer doesn’t have a firing pin on its face. Instead, the hammer face is flat and it strikes another flat piece of metal that rises up when the trigger is pulled to transfer the hammer’s force to frame-mounted firing pin.
There is no way the hammer can touch the firing pin without the intermediary transfer “flag” in position. This lets the shooter take advantage of loading all six chambers and carrying the gun with confidence that it will remain safe until the trigger is pulled.
Carrying 17 percent more ammo than a five-shot revolver has its advantages, to be sure. Very few snub nose revolvers are six-shooters since most of them have a capacity of five.
The MSRP of the new Cobra is $699 but I’ve seen them online around $675. That’s not a huge discount but two factors tend to keep the real-world price a little higher…first, it’s a real Colt. The name is associated with over a century of firearms history and quality construction. The second factor is simply supply/demand…this is a new model and it will take a while for production to satisfy demand. At any rate, I’m glad to see Colt back in the wheel gun business…maybe it won’t end with just the Cobra. We can hope…
Kimber is a company known for making top-of-the-line 1911s and rifles. They fairly recently got into the revolver business with the introduction of a six-shot snub nosed .357 Magnum.
They now show eight different snub nosed revolvers on their website ranging in price from $899 to almost $1200. There is even a custom-engraved version for $1455. If you are the type who wants the best regardless of cost, the Kimber might be for you. Expect a real-world price of around $700 for the brushed stainless K6S.
These are well-thought-out carry guns that are produced with one intention: to be the best short-barreled concealed carry .357 Magnum out there.
Options range from models with night sights, a blackened DLC or natural stainless finish, two- or three-inch barrels and fancy wood grips.
Also, the cylinder design is different than most…flats are cut across it. This helps keep the weight and the overall width down a bit.
Speaking of weight, the K6S is the lightest small-frame .357 Magnum revolver going as of this writing. Six pedal-to-the-metal rounds of .357 ammo in a 23-ounce package has a certain appeal to a lot of shooters. Just be aware that the recoil will be fierce.
R46102 (Blue), R46202 (High-Polish Stainless) in .357; R35102 (blue) and R35202 (High-Polish Stainless) in .38 Special
Rossi, a firearms company owned by Taurus, is known for making single-shot and lever rifles in an affordable price range. They make revolvers in both .357 Magnum and .38 Special. I owned a .357 snub nose revolver and a lever-action rifle made by Rossi and currently own a six-inch .357 Rossi revolver. The frames for the snubbie and the four- and six-inch barreled guns are the same; the only variable is the barrel length. The Rossi is essentially equivalent to a Smith and Wesson K-frame gun, not as small as some of the snubbies listed here, but eminently concealable. All Rossi revolvers are six-shot, with rubber Hogue-type round-butt, finger groove grips.
The polished stainless finish has to be seen to be believed. It approaches nickel plating in its brightness. To be sure, a carry gun probably shouldn’t announce its presence by a shiny, bright, blinding glow but wow…what a finish! They do make a blued version that might be more suitable for concealed carry but I do love my Rossi’s brightly polished finish.
An Accurate Gun
Rossi revolvers are accurate, barrel length notwithstanding. I have a picture on my phone of a squirrel I removed from the top of a tall hickory tree with my 6-inch Rossi .357, shooting offhand. I was using a midrange .357 handload. One shot and down he came. I say this not to brag about my shooting but to demonstrate how accurate these revolvers are. You may be thinking “it’s a snub nose – I won’t need to shoot much past a few yards so it’ll do.”
You would probably be correct in that assumption, but what about the one time that you might have to reach out a bit with your gun? It does happen…not every close encounter of the bad kind occurs at a measured seven yards. Or, what if you need to dispatch a rabid critter and your Rossi is the only gun at hand? They will do either job well. We tend to forget that the intrinsic accuracy of a snub nosed revolver has very little to do with practical accuracy. The short sight radius is the fly in the ointment here. If you were to mount a short-barreled gun in a Ransom rest, you might well be amazed by the groups it would print at 25 or even 50 yards. The reason we may not shoot like that is that we have to use the sights, which are pretty close together. My Rossi guns all were (or are) accurate regardless of barrel length or sight radius. The Rossi snubbie is a well-made gun for a street price of around $300. They are also backed by a lifetime warranty, just icing on the cake. Check one out – you might be surprised at how good it feels in your hand.
We will look at two Ruger snub-nosed revolvers – the LCR/LCRx and the SP101.
By way of clarification, if I refer to the LCRx, that’s the model that has the exposed hammer spur that you can cock to fire in single action mode.
The LCR’s hammer is internal; this model fires double action only.
The guns are the same except for the difference in the frame required to accomodate an exposed hammer spur versus one that totally encloses the hammer.
Both guns use a polymer frame with stainless steel making up the important, stressed parts like the cylinder, barrel, etc.
The use of polymer in snub nosed revolvers is still fairly limited…the only other manufacturer that make a polymer-framed wheel gun is Taurus that I know about. There may be others out there but I’ve not seen them.
Why a polymer frame? Because they can make the gun ridiculously lightweight and yet still have all the strength that they need.
The LCR weighs in under 14 ounces, with its poly frame and drastically-fluted cylinder. If you are a pocket carrier like me, you appreciate the light weight. The only time it works against you is when you fire the gun, especially with +P loads. But, if you can take the recoil, the LCR makes a great carry gun.
If you like the idea of the LCR but wish it came in .357, it does. It is constructed of stainless steel and polymer and weighs in around 17 ounces. So, no matter which cartridge you wish to shoot in your lightweight LCR, Ruger has you covered. Expect to find the LCR for around $430-$450 at your local gun shop.
The SP101 is Ruger’s mini-tank disguised as a revolver. This thing is tough. When you buy an SP101 you get one of the grandsons of the original Security Six .357 introduced in 1972. (The other grandson is the GP-100).
The Security Six was built to be carried by police, security guards or civilians. The gun was a no-nonsense stainless or blued .357 with a short barrel (usually either 2.5 or 4 inches although longer tubes were available). Having an adjustable rear sight, the gun was at home in a bullseye competition but had a different purpose: to defend whoever was carrying it from whatever was going down. Production halted in 1988. The SP101, introduced in 1989 as a smaller-framed companion to the GP-100, is built a lot like the older model but with newer metals and construction methods. It did go from a six-shot cylinder to one that holds five rounds and the snubbie-length guns have fixed sights but other than that, the guns are pretty much alike except for the grips. The lesser-expensive SP101 utilizes a plastic grip in place of the wooden grips on the older gun. You can, however, get grips made out of fancy wood. Another option is the hybrid rubber-wood grip that Ruger makes.
The SP101, as mentioned, is one tough hombre. Being chambered in .22LR, 327 Federal Magnum, .38 Special or .357 Magnum, there is one for just about every shooter’s preference. With either a 2.25- , 3- or a 4.2-inch barrel and optional fiber optic front sight, the SP101 is a do-all type of revolver. It shines in the concealed carry role, since it is on the small side for a gun of such power and hides well on your person. Five rounds of .357 Magnum would definitely inspire confidence in the carrier when he or she must venture into the less-desirable parts of town. MSRP starts at $719 for the fixed-sight 2.25 or 3-inch barreled gun. Expect to pay around $550 locally.
Smith & Wesson
Smith and Wesson has been in the snub-nosed revolver business since 1880. The company truly understands what constitutes a quality concealed carry revolver. Today, according to their website, they offer no less than 51 different J-frame models.
What does the “J” stand for? Small frame.
S&W letters their frames according to size: J for small, K/L for medium, N for large, X for extra-large and the .410-firing Governor has its own designation, the Z frame.
As long as we are defining S&W’s guns, let’s also mention that if a gun’s model number starts with anything but a “6” it is a blued finish. The 6-prefix denotes stainless steel. An example of this would be the Model 442, a blued Airweight enclosed-hammer J-frame, with its stainless counterpart’s model number being 642.
The 642, as referenced above, is the best-selling snubbie S&W makes. I believe people like it because there is no hammer spur to possibly get snagged on something as you draw the gun. That is the only difference, that I can see. My Model 638 is identical to the 642 in all regards except the shrouded hammer on mine is different than the enclosed hammer of the 642. My 638 has been likened to a humpback whale, what with the rounded hammer shroud prominently displayed at the rear of the frame but I take that sobriquet in stride in trade for the ability to cock the hammer manually if needed. They both weigh about 14 ounces, are 5-shot, .38 +P capable and come standard with a rubber grip.
The rear sight is a square trough cut into the top strap, leading to the front sight blade. Shooting this gun well does take practice. I shoot target-to-mid-range .38 loads in mine for practice and carry Hornady Critical Defense ammo for other purposes. These guns all fit in a pocket holster easily. If you can hide the 1.4-inch-wide cylinder, you’re good to go. (A lot of guys complain about that “wide” cylinder but have no qualms about carrying a semiauto that’s at least that wide all over. Methinks they doth protest too much).
You can get the 642 from the factory with Crimson Trace laser and no internal lock for an MSRP of $699. If you want the no-laser version, that runs $469. Real-world prices tend to hover around $400 for the plain version and correspondingly more for the laser model. Of course, S&W sells Performance Center models with exotic wood grips, etc. that will set you back more, but for a gun-that-goes-bang-every-time, the simple, production models work very well. I speak from experience that these guns are tough and have no trouble at all with .38 Special +P self-defense ammo. They work well for their intended purpose and have for many decades.
The S&W M&P Bodyguard .38 is a modern design that utilizes a polymer grip, aluminum alloy frame and stainless steel barrel and cylinder. There are three factors about this gun that really grabbed me when I picked it up. First, the cylinder release. Being a lefty, the press-forward S&W cylinder release has always been on the wrong side of the gun for me. The Bodyguard solves that problem by making it truly ambidextrous. The press-forward latch has been moved to the top of the frame, just behind and under the rear sight. Simply slide the lever forward with either thumb and press the cylinder open. I’m not sure why it’s taken this long for this type of release to become popular, but I’m glad it has.
Secondly, the front sight is pinned so you can replace it with a luminous or night-type blade if desired. Third, what got me was the price. The full-blown MSRP on the non-laser-equipped gun is only $385, with the Crimson Trace-equipped model going for $539. A real-world price on the non-laser model tends to be around $350 while the laser model is sold for around $450.
The Bodyguard is a 642-style, enclosed hammer model that weighs just over 14 ounces. It is a 5-shot .38 +P J-frame with its 1.87 inch barrel and abbreviated, curved grip.
If you are looking for a snubbie that has a cylinder that’s easier to open than the standard versions (I’m talking to all my fellow left-handers), then this is the gun for you.
A Bonus – The Model 640
The Model 640 is not on my list above, but I thought I’d throw it in, anyway. Here is a 22-ounce, 5-shot, chunky little J-frame that fires the .357 Magnum (and, of course, the .38 Special) cartridges. The barrel is 2.125 inches. It is built along the lines of the 642 except it is all stainless steel (no aluminum alloy frame) and sports a black ramped front sight blade with a white insert.
It lists for $729, but you should see them for around $600 locally. If you are looking for a dual-caliber hideout gun, this is the one for you. Just be aware that you will want to practice with .38 or lower-pressure .357 loads and reserve the heavy artillery for serious duty. Remember my analogy about getting whacked with a baseball bat from above – that enters in here. It may well be worth it, though, to have the extra velocity and energy of the .357, however marginal they may be, at your side in a time of need. Only you can make that call.
(Note: If the S&W 640 is priced a little above your price range, a decent, similar-type .357 snubbie is the Taurus 605 in blue or stainless. They typically sell for a real-world price of around $300. You may want to check that out).
Speaking of Taurus, we end our little stroll down Snub Nose Lane with a look at one of their most popular models, the 85. This popular little snubbie rides in hundreds of pocket or other holsters. Well-made, affordable, lifetime warranty – this gun has a lot to offer. Here we have a 22-ounce 5-shot +P snubbie with a 2-inch barrel. The 85 has a lot going for it. With an MSRP of $389, it’s not a bad buy but it becomes absolutely golden at a discount price $215-$295. At that price, you might think about one for each front pocket.
OK, one will do but…will it shoot? The short answer is, yes.
One main factor that makes some snubbies hard to hit anything with past a few yards is their weight (or lack of it, to be more precise). A gun that doesn’t weigh one pound tends to be snappier when fired than one that weighs more – that’s simple physics. This gun, at the same weight as the above-mentioned S&W 640 .357, is easier to shoot well than a lighter gun. If you must have a lighter version, Taurus makes one at 17 ounces, so you are covered either way. They also make enclosed-hammer guns similar to the S&W 642 (example, their Model 650 in either .357 or .38 Special).
I am describing Taurus’s mainline snub nosed seller, the 85, but I would be doing the reader a disservice if I didn’t at least mention their new-in-2018 iteration of the snubbie .38 – the Model 856.
This is a six-shot revolver, pretty much identical to the 85 except for the extra round and the slightly-larger cylinder (85, 1.346 inches and 856, 1.41 inches). Depending on your needs, one of these revolvers might fill the bill.
I have had good luck with Taurus (and Rossi) revolvers. You might want to at least take a look at one at your local gun shop. You might be pleasantly surprised at what you find.
So, what do we take away from all this? My first purpose in writing this article was to emphasize that revolvers aren’t dead. They are still viable carry guns. Evidently, some pretty heavy-hitters in the gun manufacturing industry think so, as well. Ruger, Smith and Wesson, Colt, Kimber and Taurus (among others) have all introduced new revolver designs in recent years. They would not do so if the guns did not sell.
The other reason I write this is to hopefully make the reader more aware of what’s out there in terms of short-barreled concealed carry revolvers. At no time in our history have there been more options for handgun shooters than now. (Semiautos included, as well). This is a great time to buy a new gun. With the favorable political climate, manufacturers tend to have built-up inventories and are wanting to sell as many guns as possible, so good deals abound. The next time you’re at your local gun shop, why not check out a couple of revolvers? With one of them in your pocket or on your belt, you have some great protection at hand. Another plus is you don’t have to pick up brass! I wish you good shooting – be safe!
Mike has been a shooter, bullet caster and reloader for over 40 years. Never one to be satisfied with the status quo, he is often found at his reloading bench concocting yet another load. With a target range in his backyard and after 40 years of shooting, his knowledge of firearms and reloading is fairly extensive. He is married, with four sons and daughters-law and 7-and-counting grandkids.