Sniper Country Duty Roster

January 1999



To all our readers here at Sniper Country, we wish to take this time to wish you the Happiest of New Years. Though I'm posting this I'm sure Marius and Scott (x-ring) will agree, that without your dedication and support Sniper Country could not be what it is today!
Here is to a even greater new year. May your hand be steady and your aim be true. THANK YOU!

Sarge

Sarge <garryrn@dfn.com>
Area 51, NM USA - Friday, January 01, 1999 at 00:41:45 (EST) 


Happy New Year to all at Sniper Country. We may not all agree on the finer points of riflery, but it is nice to see that we all respect one another's opinions. Its been fun - and I believe 1999 will be even better. Good Night Everyone. Good Night Russ - wherever you may be. Hope you are happy!!

al
Alexander Ostapowicz <aaostapowicz@worldnet.att.net>
Getting Ready for Usher In 1999 with my Sweetie in Blustery, Ohio USA - Friday, January 01, 1999 at 01:09:33 (EST) 


What a night, wrecks, drunkens, "Happy New Years" wife bashings galore, and no Crullers at 7-11! Uh none for me thank you very much Sir!But, I Counted over fifty harvestable size deer, Sorry no NOD's or rifle at sighting time all you Bambi Slayers.

Pat(Mr Bullet),
I Hope all goes well for your wife and both of you return home safely. Do you want to tell Jeff A. we're increasing the voltage in therapy or should I?

Bolt,
Try the Hornady TAP too in addition to X-rings selections. Did ya get the PSS for X-mas? Harris shorty and/or tripod gets my vote!
 

Euro-Dudes:
Is that Walther "cheapie" anything like the old KKM's i think that was the model? a most excellent price!

Chao for now!
 

peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
DEER-CITY, bY-gAWd USA - Friday, January 01, 1999 at 11:06:07 (EST) 


peteR,
Oh the memories!!! New Years was always a time of joy for everyone ,except Law Enforcement, we always had to clean up the mess. I was a State Trooper so mine were usually on the highway.
I think Jeff A. has probably had "To Much" electricity and now he's getting really charged up with all that computer time(HA) Happy New Year Pete!!
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Friday, January 01, 1999 at 12:46:07 (EST) 
Thank you all for the fun I had with this site in 1998 and I hope this will continue throughout this new year.

"Ende"
Torsten <lasercon@dialup.globe.de>
G3ermany - Friday, January 01, 1999 at 13:14:54 (EST) 


Its cold, its snowing, and I love it!

Greetings from West by Gawd. Got another couple of days up here then its back to Clintonia to pack my trash, my dog and my guns to head back.

Storm Mountain is everything I thought it would be, except colder.

Mike - Brought your slings up here and we are going to play today. We are thinking about using them at a combat Service Rifle match with AR's in Canada this year.

PNgreif. I fit the saddle to my tripod looks good. I'll be getting with Kudu and make some minor mods to the attachment system and we'll let the students play with it this spring.

We are stroking the databook. My moving is slowing this down a bit but we'll have for you guys soon enough for spring.

Rick, you gotta get your butt up here man. Bring the old lady.

Kudu, Hoist me.

Well guys gotta go.

See ya.
 

gooch <gooch@stormmountain.com>
Elk Garden, WV USA - Friday, January 01, 1999 at 14:02:50 (EST) 


To those who know about the PSS with the 5R barrel:
I never heard of these barrels before you guys mentioned them. I read one message that said they were 24" barrels with uncrowned muzzles. This gun is put away for the winter and is kind of hard to get at it now to check the number of grooves. My PSS is parkerized, has a 24" barrel and an uncrowned muzzle so now I'm wondering if I have one of these barrels on my gun. My question is: are all the 24", uncrowned, parkerized PSSs the 5R version? I bought this PSS about 6 years ago from a police supply store that doesn't sell to the public. They told me that they don't sell many rifles there so it may have been sitting in storage for a while before I bought it making it older than 6 years. Thanks for your help.
Kodiak <rvl@inil.com>
USA - Friday, January 01, 1999 at 15:28:36 (EST) 
Does anyone know where I can find some unusual USMC t-shirts? Does anyone have a phone # for Bob Depp's T-shirt place in Kentucky?
Ding <ding@stev.net>
USA - Friday, January 01, 1999 at 15:33:15 (EST) 
Sans Broussard: I was visiting a shooting friend New Years morning and can give you a title to get out of the Library. (Good thing I learned 4-wheeling driving techniques in the service - the city hadn't plowed the streets.) He had a small thick book packed with exquisite technical detail on just about every imagineable military bolt action.

You are hereby directed to get the following book:

"Book of Rifles", by WHB Smith & Joseph E Smith, The Stackpole Company, copyright 1948 by the NRA, reprinted in 1960 and 1963. The Library of Congress number is 63-12562.

Good reading and have fun identifying your rifle.

Terry
Terry Warner <twarner@sk.sympatic.ca>
Canada - Friday, January 01, 1999 at 15:38:12 (EST) 


Hi can someone comment on the relation
between twist rate and bullet weight for
the .308? I understand that in the .223
faster rate is recommended for the heavier,
longer bullets where 62-80 gr can use 1-8
or faster rate. Is there a similar relation
for the .308? What's a good weight for 1:12?
Thank you, everyone, and have a nice new year.
Hello Mr. Nosack!

Lou
Lou S <spunkbubble@juno.com>
S. Fla USA - Friday, January 01, 1999 at 18:06:08 (EST) 


To all a Happy New Year. To all I promised slings, they should be sent out next week(Sorry Ex Wife troubles have taken alot of my spare time lately)

Products I have recently tried that are great: 1. Slope doper this thing is great and thanks Dave for it. 2. MilDot Master You are a god for inventing this. Everyone should have one.

I was sorry to hear about B&L stopping production of the Tactical scope. The more I use mine the more I like it.
Mike M. <DMMDNLN@AOL.COM>
Calif USA - Friday, January 01, 1999 at 23:15:35 (EST) 


Lou: Gunsmiths generally use the Greenhill Formula to determine the optimal twist for a given bullet. The formula is T=150(d/r) for velocities from about 1500 to 2800 fps. Substitute 180 for the 150 value for velocities exceeding 2800 fps. "T" is the twist rate. "d" is the bullet diameter. "r" is the bullet length to diameter ratio (length of bullet divided by diameter). In .308, it works out fairly well. Sierra 168 grain Matchking is 0.308 inches in diameter. Bullet length is about 1.210 inches so we have a length to diameter ratio of 3.929. Plugging this value into the formula and using the 150 constant (the proven best velocity for the 168 grain MK is 2550 - 2600 fps), we get T=150 x (.308/3.929); T=150 x 0.078; T=11.76 inches or 11 3/4 inch twist …. One rotation of the bullet for every 11.76 inches of barrel traveled. This is very, very close to the "standard" 12 twist barrels on our PSS's and on my Chandler and one of the reasons they shoot the 168s so well. The 175 Matchkings do not perform as well in the 12 twist barrels. Again diameter is 0.308 inches. Bullet length is 1.257 inches, resulting in an ld ratio of 4.081. … plugging into formula (optimal velocity is 2500 to 2550 fps so we will use the 150 constant again) T = 150 x (.308/4.081); T = 150 x 0.0755; T = 11.320. That approximate half iinchtwist difference makes a big difference in my guns. 12 twist barrels tolerate 175s but do not excel with them. My Hart 26" 10 twist barreled .308 tactical rig, built by John Eckenrode on a Remington 700 SA in a McMillan A2 stock with Ross guard and Leupold 3.5 x 10 M3 LR, eats 168s, 175s, 180s and 190s alive. I'll never go back to slower barrels. The general rule of thumb is to use the fastest twist you can tolerate and match to the longest bullet (usually heaviest) you intend to use for the life of the barrel. I don't remember the exact source of the Greenhill formula. He was a Brit and developed it back in the late 1920s. I obtained the formula from a friend while working at Navy Intel.
Bill <lhardin1@netscape.net>
Clearwater, FL USA - Friday, January 01, 1999 at 23:40:30 (EST) 
I have a question about a scope mentioned in the
weapon system review: "Savage Rifles: 110FP Tactical,
112FV, and 112BVSS"

The author mentioned that all of his rifles have
Tasco 6x24 40mm scopes on them.

Does anyone which flavor? (...there are several
Tasco's of that power)

I have been looking at scopes that are considerably more
expensive that the above mentioned....but if it's good
for him.....it may very well be good enough for me !!!

Has anyone had experience with these scopes ???

Thanks for the help !!!
Ken <kknjoey@webzone.net>
Broken Arrow, OK USA - Saturday, January 02, 1999 at 01:02:51 (EST) 


I'm looking to get an AR-10 and need to move some possessions to do it. I have an AN/PQS 4A IR laser sight for the AR 15, ART II scope with Heavy Duty M14 mount, B&L Tactical, Stainless Fluted 20" AR15 barrel w/freefloat handguard. Anyone interested? Best offer that's not a joke.
David
David <bailey@lokey.cvinet.com>
USA - Saturday, January 02, 1999 at 11:05:52 (EST) 
Lou... While there is a fair amount of "Art" and "Disagreement" in this science of ballistics, I think your "Greenhill" formula is probably very close to being "Right on".
I am shooting a bunch of .308's with 12" twists, three are custom "Select Match" grade, and three are very good factory bbls. My normal procedure with a new gun, is to make a slew of loads starting fairly low, and work up. With 155 Palmas, and 168 Matchkings, it was typical that the groups would all be fairly good, and a few would really shine. I starting shooting the 175 Matchkings this fall, to match the BDC of my Leupold M3 LR, and found an interesting change... at the starting loads the groups were not good for the guns in question... groups were large-ish. But, as the loads got faster, the groups got smaller. To me, this indicated that the twist rate was marginal. At the velocities that I wanted, the groups were within reason for the guns, but I feel that if I drove them faster, they might go tighter.
I'm having a gun barreled by Shilen, and asked them for a 10" twist, and Gary Huntsman of Shilen Said "... Unless you are shooting bullets heavier than 168 grains, I'd use the 12 twist..." which supports the Greenhill formula's results. Also, the M24 bbls have a 11.25" twist, and were designed for the 175gr M118-LR load which uses the 175 Sierra Matchking.
How-some-ever, to throw some confusion into the pot for discussion…
Berger Bullets, says, on their web sight...
.308 CAL 155gr Very Low Drag Recommended twist rate is 1/14
.308 CAL 168gr Very Low Drag Recommended twist rate is 1/13
.308 CAL 175gr Very Low Drag Recommended twist rate is 1/13
.308 CAL 185gr Very Low Drag Recommended twist rate is 1/12
.308 CAL 190gr Very Low Drag Recommended twist rate is 1/12
.308 CAL 210gr Very Low Drag Recommended twist rate is 1/11
… and the Berger VLD's are longer, for a given weight, than the Sierra's???

Would be interested in results (not theories) of shooters that have shot the heavier Sierras and/or Bergers in 12" twist barrels at long range.

Pablito

Paul "Pablito" Coburn <condor@mags.net>
It's 2 damn degrees here!!!, in Connecticut! USA - Saturday, January 02, 1999 at 12:04:51 (EST) 


Sarge again wishes everyone a Happy New Year and asks:
OK so this isn't "really" a sniper weapon question but so many things here tend not to be - what do you'all think about the reliable old M-1 Garand? What is your experience with it and what is the cost in your area? And NO I'm not looking to go the CMP route my local shop has one in pretty good condition at the same price as CMP with all the BS from CMP! Yes I've been to Fulton Armory's site and a few others as well I'm looking for real world info here not advertisments! Thanks group!

Sarge

Sarge <garryrn@dfn.com>
Area 51, NM USA - Saturday, January 02, 1999 at 14:18:03 (EST) 


OK so I can't type....that should have read - same price as CMP WITHOUT all the BS from CMP.

Oh well! Hey Marius can we put a spell checker on this thing!!

Sarge
Sarge <garryrn@dfn.com>
Area 51, NM USA - Saturday, January 02, 1999 at 14:21:50 (EST) 


Bill,
I enjoyed your post on the twist rates you explained it very well!!

Pablito,
I have a 1 in 12 twist 308 tactical with a Hart heavy barrel and it shoots the 168s and 155s into .3s or under all day long. I tried some Berger 175 VLDs in it and they shot into .3 and 4s at 100yds and I then tried them at 400yds and they shot into .6 MOA and I was pleased with this until I shot the 155s which were under .5 MOA and 4 were in .25 MOA!! So I have to agree with what you say . Would you believe I let my kid talk me out of this rifle!!!
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Saturday, January 02, 1999 at 14:41:44 (EST) 


Kodiak,
You wrote:
I read one message that said they were 24" barrels with uncrowned muzzles.

All barrels have a crown, technically. It is where the bullet exits the barrel. Maybe what the writer meant was that the crown was not coned, counterbored, etc. Even a straight 90° cut across the barrel face is a "crown". A crown doesn't have to be fancy to do what is needed. Assume that the bullet is straight in the barrel (large assumption). We want the gases to vent evenly around the circumference of the bullet base as it breaks seal with the crown. You probably already know this.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lou,
I have no qualms with the Greenhill formula, and it has serve us well for century or so. I suggest you visit this site and enter the data that you have at hand and it will calculate the stability factor of the bullet. This is from the McGyro program developed by Bill Davis and Robert McCoy. This program takes into consideration:
O.A.L. of projectile
Nose length
Meplat diameter
Nose shape
Boattail length
End diameter
Twist rate
A stability factor of between 1.25 and 1.75 or so will serve you well.
http://www.lascruces.com/~jbm/ballistics/drag/drag.html

Although Bill from Clearwater uses the fastest twist consistent with several parameters, conventional thought it to use the slowest that will get the job done. This way bullet balance problems are not accentuated, but minimized. Now one can say, "I always use Bergers, etc. and my bullets ARE in balance." OK,…I use them too. But when bullets feed into the lead they are usually not concentric and on-axis with the bore and therefore take on a shape that is conducive to perfect balance.

I am just picking nits here, but thought you would like to hear the other side of the coin. Tactical people and target shooters SHOULD be picking nits. More accuracy never hurts and may do some good. No sense in giving it away for no benefit.

In Champions Choice catalog they mentioned stocking 1:11 twist Kreiger's for people who can not make up their mind. Sounds like a reasonable solution to me.

As an aside, back in the '60s and early '70s when 168s were used in benchrest competition, 1:14" twist ruled.

My Rem. 40-XC has a 1:12 ¼" twist barrel and uses 190 gr. Sierra's just fine.
Ron N. <rcn8@accnorwalk.com>
USA - Saturday, January 02, 1999 at 15:07:51 (EST) 


Sarge: My father was a veteran of many battles fought with a M-1 rifle and he thought it was designed by God. I am a veteran of many Rifles and few battles and I think it was a mistake if God had anything to do with it. It is a good way to remember glorious battles of long ago but as a modern day weapon. (Sorry Dad!) It is much lacking. The front sight is loose enough to prevent good accuracy unless you install the National Match equipment on it. The rear sight is always somewhere but where you want to be (in field conditions or clogged with mud) That operating rod is a POS unless you monitor it closely it will let you down. Damn thing is heavier than a scoped sniper rifle and half of that is packing crate wood! You must use the proper powder in them or they will shatter the stock of bend the rod. Slow burning powder is an accident waiting to happen. A soldier can be trained to assemble and disassemble one in about 6 weeks if he doesn't loose his fingers trying to close the bolt. Those 10 shot clips have only one purpose and that is to alert the enemy that your out of ammunition which you usually are because the stuff weighs too much to use in a semiauto. Patton said it was the best battle instrument ever devised and at the time he said it.... It probably was but times have changed.
It is made for one thing and that's to throw lots of heavy bullets down range and keep doing it till the barrel melts down. But a sniper rifle it ain't. Course you didn't say it was! God I get in a lot of trouble for things like this. Fidabeenthere I would have wanted a 1903 Springfield with a 4 power on it. Now there was a rifle! Happy New Year!
B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Saturday, January 02, 1999 at 15:33:51 (EST) 
Bedding with JB Weld
I recently re-bedded my stainless 26" varmint 308 with JB
and I found that it was a lot less runny than Plastic Steel
[it does't run down the barrel channel as bad]. Be carefull
of what you use as a release agent: Brownell's spray works well.
I once repaired a 2" x 6" hole in the transfer case of my
4x4 suburban with it (JBl Weld) and it is still leak free.
Merlyn <Merlynh@dtgnet.com>
Pierre, sd USA - Saturday, January 02, 1999 at 15:43:49 (EST) 
I am looking for some information on a rifle no one seems to have any info on this rifle.It is a CIL model 950c it looks just like a Savage model 110, it has a adjustable trigger for pull,weight and backlash. when I looked for mounts I found them under Churchill when I checked they are the same as a Savage 110. the rifle shoots great for optics I have a Tasco 3x9 50mm if this is a savage action I would like to put a synthetic stock on this rifle. any info would be appreciated.
thank you Swanny
Swanny Kranendonk <1scanner>
harvey station, nb canada - Saturday, January 02, 1999 at 15:58:09 (EST) 
Ron N.:
Sorry about the careless use of words.
 

A few years ago I got my hands on some Remington .308 Bench Rest brass but I never used it yet. I'm not sure why but they use small primers. Has anyone out there used this brass before? Any hints about this stuff that might save me time at the loading bench will be greatly appreciated.
Kodiak <rvl@inil.com>
USA - Saturday, January 02, 1999 at 16:01:30 (EST) 


Lou, barrel twist rate.
Everyone else has thrown in their 2cents worth so I will too.
When I had my first M1A built I went thru the same dilema and settled on a 1\12 twist because I planned to shoot mostly 168's. It shot these bullets very well. The rifle also shot the lake city match 172 gr. ammo well also, at 1000 yards. These bullets actually weigh about 174.5 grains by the way. Then the Gov. started issuing something called Special Ball about 1984. This stuff was special all right. This ammo would not hold a 6 foot target at 600 yards in my rifle. And I am not the only one who noticed this. As far as I could tell the bullets were the same as the old Lake City Match but they sure didnt group as well. I built another rifle with a 1/10 twist just to be able to compete again, but as soon as I finished the rifle, the Gov. stopped issuing Special ball and started issuing M852 again for the National matches. What I'm trying to say here is if you shoot enough target matches where you have to use the ammo provided, you will eventually question the twist rate of your barrel if it is on the slow side.
Also, there is alot more to setting up a rifle to shoot so called VLD bullets than selecting the right twist rate. The longer the bullet, the more critical it is to get the bullet started right in the throat of the barrel, This calls for tight neck chambers, concentric case necks, special throating, seating depth adjustments, and so on. All of this extra trouble does not go hand in hand with a tactical rig.
Just my 2 cents worth.
Steve <nato@bright.net>
S.C.D.H., Ohio USA - Saturday, January 02, 1999 at 16:40:16 (EST) 
Kodiak,
I have used a lot of Rem.BR brass and it's great stuff!!! The only problem with it is that the small primer will sometimes not ignite the powder well when it's cold. The other thing is the brass has a larger intrenal volume compared to other brass and there fore the velocity suffers. If you use the same load and your getting 2600fps you will drop to around 2400fps. with the same load in BR brass. When I went to the BR brass in my 308VS it droped my groups a .1 to .2 and I also didn't have those "flyers" that you can't figue out where they came from. The other thing you will need to do is get a Redding Bushing die because the brass is so thin the regular die will not size the neck sometimes. As I remember its only .009 to .010 thick it will nearly fit a tight neck rifle. I used 46grs of Varget with the 168s and was then able to reach 2600+fps and the accuracy was as good as my 4895 load only a lot faster. Hope this helps if you need any nore info let me know. I wish they still made it!!!
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Saturday, January 02, 1999 at 18:03:46 (EST) 
Sarge,
Memories, memories. US Rifle, caliber .30, M-1, a 9 1/2 pound, gas operated, clip fed, semi-automatic, shoulder weapon, sir! As I used to shout back at my Marine Gunney D.I.
I first shot a Garand in high school summer ROTC camp back in the 50's. I was so small I couldn't shoot it offhand; but I did fairly well prone. I have loved the bloody thing ever since. I carried one when I was a cadet in Navy pilot training at Pensacola,FL during the summer of 61 and learned to hate carrying it in the July sun. It will definitely bite the thumb that feeds it if you aren't careful and the 8 round en-block clip does tell everyone around that it's empty; but for an all around fun toy you can't beat it, plus it is definitely a historic piece of America's past. As B. Rogers said, it isn';t a sniper rifle. I bought my last one back around 1985 or 86 and gave $600 for it. It's a cherry Winchester and shoots pretty well. The Nineteenth Edition Blue Book shows $700 for one in 98% condition. I haven't seen one for sale around here in a very long time so don't know whether that's a realistic figure or not.
Doc <docs@fidnet.com>
Digging out from under the blizzard in the Ozark boonies, MO USA - Saturday, January 02, 1999 at 20:19:34 (EST) 
Gooch:

i would if there was anything to hoist.

got your 6 dude, need any assist........any at all, ll me back.

kudu out
kudu <kudu3@aol.com>
USA - Saturday, January 02, 1999 at 21:44:34 (EST) 


Awesome sight +
Keep up the good work.
B.M. Sprowl <midget@erols.com>
West Deptford, New Jersey USA - Saturday, January 02, 1999 at 22:19:10 (EST) 
Iam looking for Info on citadel barrels. Im thinking about buying one. I hear when they were in business they made a quality product. Thank you for any knowledge you can pass on.
J. Elledge <melchapman@sprintmail.com>
USA - Saturday, January 02, 1999 at 22:38:02 (EST) 
Swanny: your CIL is a Savage-made single shot target rifle. You got lucky. You have all the makings of a TARGET rifle, not a sniper rifle. A friend of mine has one rebarrled to .223 and it is a tackdriver at the long ranges (800 - 1000yds!). He likes the 69gr Sierras.

If you are interested in paper bullseye shooting go digging around the Dominion of Canada Rifle Assoc website for the Royal New Brunswick Rifle Association. If you are interested in selling ... There are a couple of peddlers I can name who will get the rifle into the proper market.
 

Terry Warner <twarner@sk.sympatico.ca>
Canada - Saturday, January 02, 1999 at 23:06:15 (EST) 


Kodiak... The Remington .308 brass ".308 Bench Rest brass" was never intended to be shot in a .308... back in the late 70's Remington released the model XP-100 pistol in 7/mmBR Rem, and 6/mm BR Rem...
But for some reason didn't release ammo. They chose to sell a special
brass called .308 "BR" to be used to form these cartridges. It was Remingtons effort to compete with the then overwhelming group of "PPC" cartridges.
The entent was that the .308 BR brass was to be used to make the cases for the new line of Rem "BR" line of guns (I'm sure that a lawer had something to do with it). After 3 or 4 years, Remington decided to come out with the completed cases...
The .308 "BR" brass was never entended to be shot in a .308...
... makes a lot of sense, doesn't it!!!
Pablito
Paqul "Pablito" Coburn <condor@mags.net>
USA - Sunday, January 03, 1999 at 00:18:03 (EST) 
I'm caught in my error. It is of course 8 shots in the M1 clips. Can't remember if it's been 10 years or 8 since I shot one! It will probably be that long before I shoot one again. Seriously I'm not meaning to deamean that old battle weapon but it did have a few shortcomings and I want the casual readers and those who tune in to learn to get the facts..... Thanks Pablito for correcting me!
B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Sunday, January 03, 1999 at 01:09:20 (EST) 
Speaking of BR type brass. I still have a couple of new boxes of Remington 6 BR brass whose flash holes were not punched. These were not mistakes, but were sold this way for the experimenter to drill at his discretion.
Ron N. <rcn8@accnorwalk.com>
USA - Sunday, January 03, 1999 at 02:55:03 (EST) 
I can't believe it. First off, I have to tunnel my way back home from the week-end because Kodiak and Russ couldn't keep the snow out of Chicago, and while I'm gone everyone jumps on rifle twist.
Where was rifle twist talk when I was ordering my new Hart barrel ?
Well, not all is lost. I was one of the few nuckle-heads that went with the 1-11 twist.
It would just be nice if I could only GET my rifle from the shop. I mean, Santa didn't bring me a case of Fed. 175gr. match ammo and a new Leupold M3 LR scope for nothing. I wasn't even good last year! But he knew how to get me. Yes sir-ree bob. Tack on a nother week or month to get my rifle from the shop. That fat bastard!!!

I hope that everyone had a good Christmas and new year.

Al, did Santa bring you your Mil-dot Master? He knew once I started playing around with the new M3 that I would have to buy one also. I honestly think that he is punishing me! Maybe next year I won't be so bad. Yeah, RIGHT!!!!!

Well, I can't get to the range to shoot for all the snow. Don't have my bolt rifle to shoot even if I could. What do ya do with all this snow? Did I mention that it snowed?
I think that it's time to dust off the skis and hit the slopes!
 
 

D. West <westforce@juno.com>
Too much snow in, IL. USA - Sunday, January 03, 1999 at 07:57:16 (EST) 


Kodiac,

The idea behind the small primers (in Remington 308 BR) is that it allows the powder to burn more evenly, But, ignition problems can happen.

Stay Safe
Depity Dave <dprolls@access.mountain.net>
Freezing my A__ off in , Blistering Cold West Virginia USA - Sunday, January 03, 1999 at 12:06:36 (EST) 


The Rookie asks first questions of year.

1. Ideal sniper spotter's backup weapon. AR15, etc?

2. Carry gear. For 3-5 day insertion, what gear to carry including tactical vest, backpack, ammo, food, etc.? Major Plaster's gear seems to be taylored to LE instead of field.

3. Are drag bags actually used on a mission, or just for carry purposes?

Scott, got the message, all slings are up for sale. Do you also remove the swivel studs? What do you fill the holes with?

Gillie monster suit construction is underway!

thanks, Bolt
Bolt <mbolt34547@aol.com>
USA - Sunday, January 03, 1999 at 13:03:42 (EST) 


Let's drag up the 5r barrel stuff one more time. Is there a way with the naked eye to tell if a barrel is a 5r? Have my eyes pealed, but still confused what their pealed for.
 

Bolt <mbolt34347@aol.com>
USA - Sunday, January 03, 1999 at 13:16:23 (EST) 


Thanks everybody for your input on the Rem .308 BR brass. Not knowing anything about that stuff I enjoy reading what other people have to say about it.

D. West:
In case you haven't noticed it snowed up here recently. Out in front of the house, somewhere in a chest deep snowdrift my car is waiting for me. Looks like we won't be shooting on that farm for a while.
Kodiak <rvl@inil.com>
Snowcity (Chicago), USA - Sunday, January 03, 1999 at 14:30:38 (EST) 


Thank you, everyone, for the
input on the .308 bullet weight
twist rate relationship. All
inputs were archived in the hard-
drive for future references for
myself and others w/ proper credits.

Sincerely,

Lou
Lou S <spunkbubble@juno.com>
S. Fla USA - Sunday, January 03, 1999 at 14:41:21 (EST) 


Bolt - Count the radials (Technically not lands and grooves). Normal barrels are even numbers I believe. In a 5R barrel there will be 5 "lands".

It appears that Storm Mountain will be fielding a team for this years Dominion of Canada Rifle Association/Canadian Forces Small Arms Championships. Any other schools up to fielding teams? Web site is www.DCRA.ca. Matches are the end of July and cover sniper team, pistol and service rifle. We are trying to make it a Storm Mountain/Armament Technolgy team. Come on guys. It'll be fun to watch us win every thing.

See ya.
Gooch <gooch@stormmountain.com>
Elk Garden, WV USA - Sunday, January 03, 1999 at 15:19:28 (EST) 


My .308 PSS has a badly pitted barrel from the factory. I think it was one of those where the parkerizing leaked into the bore. To make a long story short, I tried fire-lapping it and ruined it, which really doesn't bother me because I was thinking of re-barrelling it anyway.

Any advice on what barrel to choose? I'd like a 5R but that subject's been addressed already.
Greg in PA <gbras@ptd.net>
Palmyra, PA USA - Sunday, January 03, 1999 at 15:30:16 (EST) 


Gooch,
Whats required to get on your team for Canada and when is that match??? I would love to go to one of your classes but the distance is so great and with the extra expence of the Wife I can't make it this year. Will you be going back to the Wyoming shoot this year??
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Sunday, January 03, 1999 at 15:49:31 (EST) 
The weather in E. Central IL is so foul that I've been doing a bit of cruising. I've never posted to this list so hope it reads.

The CIL rifle that Terry is refering to is the CIL 950T. Unless I read it wrong, the owner of the CIL stated that it was a 950C. I wouldn't have a clue on that one. Very few 950T's were made for Canadian target shooting in the late 60's or early 70's. Jim Houlden was behind CIL offering this rifle at the time and I think he told me that only about 275 were made. In issue form I can state that it is a rare beastie. Most have been rebarreled or the club that was used for the "issue" stock was modified or replaced. The story was that two barrels were shipped with the rifles. One an Anschutz and the other a Savage. The reason that one of the barrels was never used was that it was chambered backwards. Don't anyone ask details on this because my ancient brain just doesn't recall.

There was mention by someone of going to the DCRA matches in August. This has been my annual vacation for going on twenty years. It is a highly recommended trip and the setting is one you won't soon forget.

As to the post on fitting the fastest twist barrel that will ever be necessary until rebarreling....This is excellent advice. It is very hard to overspin a GOOD bullet.

The 175 Sierra is an extrmemely good bullet. In my .308 Krieger 1 in 13" .298 - .3065 machine rest barrel, I've shot quite a lot of these bullets, mainly Federal .308M2, in a mid-production test about a year ago for federal. I don't recall the exact figures but the average was certainly under 1/2 minute at 500 yards. In two tests of ten rounds of handloaded ammunition, each test was exactly 1/4 minute
or 1 1/4". Very impressive!

Sorry for the rattle, but I'm snowed in.

The very best 1999 to all.

Bill Wylde <k9wxr@rr1.net>
IL USA - Sunday, January 03, 1999 at 17:45:21 (EST) 


Bill Wylde (aka Capt of the Redneck Rifle Team) is as good an AR15 'smith as you'll ever find. He is good and he is busy. Don't ask for anything to be delivered in the summer. He takes his trips to Ottawa very seriously.

The best story I can tell about Bill, old friend of friends of mine, is his 'ceramic barreled Model 700'. Stress cracks and all, he can almost outshoot anything else on the line.

The CIL 950C maybe a single shot varmint action. It may just be a magazine deer rifle. There was a time when the $C was better than the $US and gun makers sold a lot of guns into Canada.

Terry Warner <twarner@sk.sympatico.ca>
Canada - Sunday, January 03, 1999 at 19:59:58 (EST) 


Opinions on Leupold 25x50 compact spotting scope??????
Bolt <mbolt34547@aol.com>
USA - Sunday, January 03, 1999 at 21:37:25 (EST) 
Hello,

I have a question about the Savage 110 FP rifle and long-action rifles in general. Do any of you have any experience with these type of rifles jamming? I recently read a sniper's comment that unless the ammo is pushed all the way back in the magazine, long-action rifles tend to jam. Is this typical? I intend to purchase a rifle soon and want to know if I should consider a short-action rifle. Are these any better for that matter?

Thanks,

Marshal Childers
HavredeGrace, MD
Marshal Childers <mchild2@erols.com>
USA - Sunday, January 03, 1999 at 21:38:38 (EST) 


Marshall: my experience with the 110 fp is anything but Jamming. Usually the .223 is kind of finicky about feeding and that model is excellent compared to a short action Remington as far as getting jammed in the magazine. The .308's I've used were also excellent with the long action contributing to the ease of loading. I had no problems with it at all.
Bill Wylde; Old sport you have sunk to a new low hanging out around here with these outlaws! But we could sure use your advise! Sorry we missed snow out here it sounds like a ball. Good to hear from you again!
B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 01:35:04 (EST) 
I've decided purchase a spotting scope on the cheap side. I realize that you get what you pay for, but my Leupold Mk4 left me short of funds. My price range is $200-$250 and I've been considering Bushnell. I've seen the Spacemaster line and they look OK. The biggest drawback seems to be that they are not waterproof (I can't stalk with it during bad weather). The trophy model is in fact waterproof. If anyone's used any of these model I would appreciate feedback. I'm also curious if anyone come across a good deal in my price range. If anyone knows of another cheaply priced spotting scope that can get me through a years worth of crawling, let's hear about it. Thanks

Zero
Zero <zero@ntr.net>
Louisville, KY USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 02:56:47 (EST) 


A short time ago there was a Mil-Dot range estimation game somewhere in "snipercountry" where did it go, where can I find it? Thanks in advance for the help. I thought it was in somebodys homepage but I can't find it. Any new sources would also be appreciated.
shawn McNally <oneshot@page.az.net>
Page, AZ USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 03:13:53 (EST) 
Shawn,

I zaped the sim. to you. Enjoy. As far as I know the target is a 2 meter giant, and the round the M 118.

I also have another Swat game sim. that has a realy nice sniper trainer with dope book, Leupold Mk 4, etc., you need to manipulate the bolt to load, dial in your range, and can shoot paper, irons, and ballons, in the try out phase. In the swat team phase the brown stuff rally hits the fan.

Anyone else out there have this ?? Bought it here in Germany, was on sale, since its more of a think/ tactic type sim and not a "Rambo Tito" game.

"Ende"
Torsten <lasercon@dialup.globe.de>
G3ermany - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 04:29:08 (EST) 


Bolt:
You do not say if the Observer's Rifle is for a Law-Enforcement team or Military Sniper/Observer team.

In the Military the Sniper and Observer swap duties and rifles. With a Law Enforcement team there cxan be no swaping of rifles. The Liability factor is to great. The Law Enforcement Observer should have a rifle as capable as the primary sniper. This will allow the Observer to assume the roll of the sniper to releave the sniper if the situation starts to drag out. (Tests show the sniper's ability to exicute a precision shot after about 20 minutes of staring through the rifle scope begin to fall off.)

An AR-15 properly set up could fill in as an observer's rifle. The problems that can not be over come with a properly set-up AR-15 are the slinging of the brass, and the small caliber not being a very good glass penetrator.

Look at your needs and fit the equipment to that need.

Bruce G.Buell, NCDS
Senior Instructor, IDRC

Bruce <buellncds@mindspring.com>
Jacksonville, FL USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 11:13:46 (EST) 


"ACHTUNG !"

my contact at Special Air Sea Services just informed me that they have a small stock of OD open top drawstring Gore-Tex Bivi Bags in new condition for about 30 Pounds (+- 50$) each.

"Ende"
Torsten <lasercon@dialup.globe.de>
G3ermany - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 11:41:20 (EST) 


Torsten,

You mean the "Spotter confirms Center Hit" game? Great Fun for those blustery By-Gawd days of late.

Sat. 23:30 hrs rainy, sleeting, generally rotten out and heading for work I hit the crest of a ice glazed hill with about 100 feet of murky visibility and a deer gracefully hops the fence on my port side and begins to cross.
Not to worry, I carefully brake/ downshift and then as I smugly look on Three more come over the fence after him. Uhhhhh-Ohhhhh
Them Deers see me, freak, and start slipping and sliding in the middle of the road as I begin the slow motion powerslide ballet "Deer Lake"
I just regain control and they break left and begin to flop around running/falling down the hill in the same direction I was travelling. Somehow I made it through four deer spasming in a twenty foot wide road downhill backwards neither tagging a deer/s or sliding off the roadway. Allah, (I mean Bubba) be Praised!

And here you guys are whining about being "Stuck Inside" Waaaa! Good thing I did not stop at 7-11 for coffee Eh?

Stay warm and safe Dudes!

peteR
peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
cOLder tHeN dEPiTiEs sIdE oF tHe MouNTn, By-Gawd USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 12:13:07 (EST) 


Anybody know the physical differences between the .30 cal Hornady 180 A-MAX and the 178 NM A-MAX... (NM=National Match)
Pablito.
Paul "Pablito" Coburn <condor@mags.net>
USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 13:00:16 (EST) 
I have doubts about the benefits of a one turn elevation knob on rifle scopes. I am not now and have never been a sniper but I have used Swarovski sniper scopes with an elevation knob that took less than one turn. These scopes were fast to adjust but just the slightest movement of the elevation knob moved the point of impact by as much as 50 yards. I might be wrong but it seems to me that by using a scope like this instead of one that requires a liitle more turning on the elevation knob and has distinct clicks that you are trading precision for speed. Estimating range has some error already, by using an elevation knob like this I believe that you are adding more error into your shot. The one turn elevation knob seems to me like something for a sharpshooter and might be better mounted on a semi auto than a bolt action sniper rifle.
As I said I am a complete amateur at this so I might be wrong. Any comments from ex or current snipers? Thanks !!!

Kodiak <rvl@inil.com>
USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 13:41:24 (EST) 


Hope everyone here had good holidays. I will forever have a New Years Eve toast to a vet of two wars and a great shooter who passed away this year on New Years Eve, my father.

Jeff Cooper <loflyin@aol.com>
unnormally cold in, Tennessee USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 14:11:13 (EST) 



Kodiak...
You're comment... "These scopes were fast to adjust, but just the slightest movement of the elevation knob moved the point of impact by as much as 50 yards."... leaves me at a bit of a loss.
I will aknowledge that I've never used a Swarovski sniper scope, but the typical "one turn sniper scope" doesn't have 50 yards of adjustment from one end to the other... maybe 12-14 yards of total adjustment (at 1000 yards), so I can't understand how a "Slight movement" could yeld such a massive error. The real attraction of the one turn scope, besides it's speed, is that it impossable to loose count of the number of turns you've made while going from 100yds/mtrs to 1000yds/mtrs.
It's not the 1/4 clicks that are the problem (though some of the scopes are bad there), but the lines on the elevation barrel that you must count to to know how many turns you have made... multiply the turns by 12 or 15 to get those MOA, then to "add" to the readings on the knob. Even the famous MK-4, M1 turrets are a real bitch to read and keep track of while "looking" for your 670yd setting... and under stress, or poor lighting, the M4-M1 is useless in the field.
The only 1/4 minute scope that I would trust under stressful condx in the 10x B&L Tactical... the 1/4 knobs and lines on the turret barrel are really "Huge"!...and are easy to track.
But under stress, the one turn dials will beat the standard 1/4 scopes every time... the one turn scopes that I have, or have used, have sufficent friction, that they won't move unless you want them to.
And as been said here before by others... on a tactical scope, if your a 1/2 moa out, even at 1000yds it's nothing, on a 1/4" target scope, if you are one or two turns out, you're not in the game, and if you play for real, you are "out of the game" big time!.

Pablito.
Paul Pablito" Coburn <condor@mags.net>
USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 14:45:28 (EST) 


To Pablito:
I guess I worded my message wrong. What I meant was that for example if your scope is adjusted to 600 meters all you have to do is turn the elevation knob a few degrees of rotation and all of a sudden your point of impact is now at 650 meters. At very long distances when your bullet drop is the most severe this 50 meter difference means a lot.
The knobs on the Swarovski easily have enough friction to not turn by accident but because there are no clicks if you want to return to a certain adjustment you have to say to yourself "it was about here", and if you're off just a little there is a big difference in your point of impact.
Never having been a sniper I don't know how important speed really is. I'm interested in learning the pros and cons of the multi turn, click knobs vs the one turn, no click systems. Most of my shooting has been done on the bench so the real life side of rifle shooting is pretty new to me. I want to learn this art that is why I ask questions like this. I appreciate your response.
Kodiak <rvl@inil.com>
USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 16:27:11 (EST) 
Bolt! Don't SELL all your slings! Just don't use them to haul the rifle around aimlessly with. hmm..that was not good grammer was it? Anyway, a good sling can be used for position shooting. You needn't toss it out. My point was that (especially hunters and infantry types) you do not want to sling carry the rifle if you plan on actually taking game (or gomers). They too follow Murphy's law and will jump up the second you sling that rifle!

Drag bag: Depends on who you talk to. From what I understand some instructors hate them. If you get a good one, it can replace the ruck on short missions, but at the same time it'll weigh a ton. I used to prefer the simple drag bag that allows no more gear than a rifle and data books. I am currently reviewing a bag that allows you to carry spotting scope, tripod, maps, and other essentials I would have put in a ruck. It even straps on like a ruck but this high "stick" does present the problem of TARGET indicator. Probably not so much an issue in LE. The all purpose drag bag does have the advantage of always being with you, where as the temptation is to cache the ruck during a stalk. Anyway, the short of it is YES. It is taken on the mission.
Scott <xring@voicenet.com>
USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 17:12:46 (EST) 


Turrets: 1/4 moa versus 1 moa. Military does not need the same precision level as LE. A body hit serves equally well as a head shot. Mission is to remove other guy's troops from field of battle. Wounded or dead, either works. LE is better served by 1/4 moa. Far more precise. Example. My buddy was nailing the head on the 600 yard target repeatedly with his 1/4 moa turreted scope. I could just graze it or just go for body shots with my LR M3 with the 1 moa Elev and 1/2 moa wind. UNLESS I held off to split the difference. But REALISTICALLY, I would not have been trying for heads at 600 in a war zone and he would not have been shooting at 600 in an LE zone. Fit the tool for the mission. You can use a 1/4 moa in war, but you are at a disadvantage, just as you can use a BDC for LE plinking, but not to great advantage.
scott <xring>
USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 17:19:14 (EST) 
Ok, so you would try heads at 600 yards in a war zone if that is all you had! I was just making a point. The 1/4 is uneeded in the military.
Scott <xring>
USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 17:21:15 (EST) 
Gooch,
After getting out of the USAR, I missed the combat shooting that I did with the team. I am curious about CAFSAC, and your team. What kind of problems (if there would be any at all) would civilians experience, brining AR type semi auto rifles into Canada? I have been up there to shoot palma, but a single shot bolt gun is a different animal all together.In 93 I went to AFSAM in Australia, and I loved it. What are the dates?
Brian
B. Murphy
USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 17:25:00 (EST) 
Kodiak, I am not familiar with the Swarovski, but all of the one turn scopes I have seen had 1 minute clicks to 1000, or 1/4 minute clicks to 500. If the scope just had a friction adjustment and no position clicks I would steer clear of it.

Scott, please clarify...are you saying not to use a sling or not to use a carry strap? I actually find a sling rather helpful when shooting from unusual positions.

Zero, look through a bunch of scopes both cheap and expensive. You may find that the quality of the cheap scopes is such that you will be better served by saving the money up a little longer to get something of a little better quality.
Rich <dick2@clarkston.com>
WA USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 17:32:53 (EST) 


Does anyone know of a good (read "Cheap") source for a new B&L 10x Tactical... S.W.F.A has them for $895, and they're not known to be low price... would like to get one before the old stock dries up.
Pablito
Paul "Pablito" Coburn <condor@mags.net>
USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 17:32:56 (EST) 
pete R

jep, thats the one. " double tap to the head ....... Beeeep.... "

or the El Presidente Drill, what a joy. and you can really piss of the DI.

In the actuall game I never made it past the scene were I dumped old Grandma in the shower! Ouups !

"Ende"
Torsten <lasercon@dialup.globe.de>
G3ermany - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 17:40:34 (EST) 


Zero,

when checking the scopes, ask the salesguy to step outside with them as looking through a window will certainly not give you a clear picture.

time to feed the neighbours kittens........... to my 110 lb. bernese mountain dog
Torsten <ya know>
G3land - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 17:51:26 (EST) 


At a recent gun show, a guy was selling U.S. military smoke grenades and white parachute flares. Are these things legal to buy, i.e. does the military ever dispose of such items to civilians?

Bach Melick <tmelick@monbar.com>
New Orleans, LA USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 19:49:52 (EST) 


Jeff:

Sorry to hear of your loss. The kind words that you have posted about your father serve as a good memorial to an obviously honorable man.
Bruce Braxton <braxton1@aol.com>
College Park P.D., GA USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 19:54:01 (EST) 


Glasses

What do you'all do about them? Seems they're always fogging up (tried sea drops, spit, other antifog compounds) and they just give your position away. I am sure at least 3 deer this year clued in on my position by seeing them.

Are contacts a good option - there is the question about dirt getting in them on a sneak.

On the good side, I got to within 20 feet of a small doe while still hunting. At about 25 yards, she got curious and strolled in the rest of the way. Dead deer if I had been so inclined. (legal, just didn't want to).

If you can sneak up on a deer, you can sneak up on almost anything (except the Storm Mountain spotters)

Pat - sorry to hear about your wife. My brother-in-law had a marrow transplant for luekemia a bit over a year ago. They caught it early and he is recovering well.

Karl <dahm0030@tc.umn.edu>
Minneapolis, Mn USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 19:56:23 (EST) 


There is a thread to the conversation about shooting matches in Canada that I can help with. The DCRA matches in Ottawa are two components, the military championships, held in early Aug(?) and the civilian matches, held later in Aug. Both matches are open to all comers, except there are some aggregates and prizes open only to Canadians, like the Queen's Medal for Champion Shot, our service rifle highest accomplishment. At the military matches, there are pistol, precision rifle, light machine gun and misc. team and pairs matches.

The civilian matches are Palma stle lie-flat and hit the bullseye. There is a class for precision scoped bipod rifles, such as most listers' already own. The rifles are shot at the same target and on the same course of fire as the off-the-elbows target rifles.

The gun laws are not that complicated - yet. Essentially, bolt actions are no problems. Semi's are either Restricted and treated like handguns, or Prohibited and not allowed across the border. Handguns are not permitted for personal protection. Semi-auto magazines over 5-shot capacity are Prohibited Devices and don't get into the country. You'd better practice your mag changes mid-string. AR-15's and that ilk are Restricted. As long as you can prove you are going to a match, and it cannot go full auto, then you are allowed to bring it in. M1A's are not Restricted. M14's are Prohibited. Safe storage means disable the firearm with a lock. No particular limits on ammo.

The Canadian Department of Justice's Canadian Firearms Centre has a website. Be patient with them right now. They are trying to register every Canadian's firearms, and just can't get the software to behave. Deadline for that piece of genius is 2003.

However, the hospitality will be memorable. The beer is good. And the US$ is worth about C$1.50.

Terry Warner <twarner@sk.sympatico.ca>
Canada - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 20:27:44 (EST) 


Karl,

Glasses & contacts? Have you given it a thought to check into laser eye surgery? I just got it done in October and it is remarkable! I've had problems with contacts almost all my life ( Ok, I'm not as old as some of you are ) from infections to loosing them doing everything.
Funny how everyone will spend mega $ on good optics and never give their own eyes a thought. I know that things COULD go wrong with the surgery, but most of the problems that happen is when they don't fallow the Doctors orders.
One exam can tell you if you're good to go and how close to 20/20 you could get.
 

D. West <westforce@juno.com>
Still shoveling #*% snow, in IL. !!! USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 21:09:51 (EST) 


Jeff... I'm very sorry for your loss.
But think... the whole country will drink to him...
... every year.

The best to you and yours...
Pablito.
Paul "Pablito" Coburn <condor@mags.net>
USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 21:44:00 (EST) 


Jeff C,
My Condolences on your loss.
 
 

Pablito,

Gotta mount board with Berger 175 VLD, Sierra 175, Hornady 178 gr. National Match & 168 A-Max sitting atop my monitor. The A-Maxes got that red synthetic tip and the National Matches have a very curious tip ogive/meplat that kinda rounds over on the edges in a manner that I can only describe as similar to a .22 rimfire.
For a lack of better words the 178NM is more streamlined/elongated through the area between the body and meplat but appears to share the same angle for the boat tail as the A-Max. So far I've found they DO SHOOT in my limited testing over the past few months w/ Varget. Like I said a couple weeks ago, BAD TO THE BONE!
 
 

Anybody Else played with them yet? Pat(MRBULLET)? Jeff A.? Bill R?
 

peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
WARM INSIDE, bY-GaWd USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 22:11:22 (EST) 


does anyone know if the savage 110fp/.308 hold it own vs. the remington 700.
BUBBA <gl4ock0@erols.com>
fredericksburg, va USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 23:02:29 (EST) 
BUBBA... Only if you are comparing them as clubs, they're about equal (the Savage may have an edge...), but if you're comparing them as long range rifles, the Rem has it hands down
Pablito.
Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 23:26:32 (EST) 
peteR: I've read your posts about the Hornady 178 NM bullets. I was curious about the weight of Varget you were using. I've noticed in all the reloading manuals they say to stay under 42.5 but I have been pushing it up to the 44.5 grain mark without any signs of pressure. I haven't been able to chronograph these loads. Anyone else experienced with upper weights of Varget? I'm still waiting for the 178 grainers from Hornady to get to my front door and then I will be able to put them through their paces. Any experienc with 4064 powder? How about with the 175 grain Sierra MKs. 4064 doesn't seem to be quite so forgiving as Varget.

Cold as your ex-wife's butt here in Ohio, and the white shit is still falling. Going to go bundle up to a perfect hourglass shaped body to keep me warm on this cold winter night. Just the thought of . . . oh fellas, - I gotta go!!!! Oooooooohhhhhh.

al
Al Ostapowicz <aaostapowicz@worldnet.att.net>
Shrunk up to the size of peas in blistering cold, Ohio USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 02:06:38 (EST) 


ON elevation clicks. Most of my scopes are 1/4 clicks and are used primarily for hunting at ranges from 100 to 600 yards. I am forever having to bore sight in the field to determine if I am back at zero caused by just loosing track of where I'm at. Late evening complicates the problem and usually the excitement of a shot complicates it. In combat it would be fatal. 1min clicks would suit me fine. Most my targets are less than 16" high. Another problem is turning it the wrong way by accident thus giving a reading that doesn't make sense. One then is plagued with the thought am I up or down? I have taken to shooting the vertical mil dots using the dot's rather than the cross hairs after finding out where (at what range) they hit. It is much quicker in a hunting situation than fooling with knobs. May not be cool but there's a bunch of dead coyotes that don't seem to care!
Actually the ability to estimate range is mighty important if your going to say you need 1/4 clicks I probably can dial as close with a 1" turrent thaan I can estimate anyway.
B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 02:44:16 (EST) 
Will A: Sorry for the delay but for some reason I could not send to you. Message sat on my COMP for days. Glad you finaly got it.

1 MOA clicks: Refer to what Rick had to say about them a while back. They are so much easier to use and far more grunt proof than the 1/4 clicks. And even at 600m you will only be 3.3" off one way or the other max. Wind and weather throw me off more than that on the first shot of the day (course I use Gods own rangefinder). As far as the scopes go, my greatest experience is with the M3's and I have found some that were very mushy and others that clicked right nicely.

Drag Bags: The smaller and lighter the better. I personally have a love/hate relationship with them. I love them on a classic stalk, like in a school situation. So much easier to crawl. Real world though I DO NOT like having my rifle in a bag. Then there is the spotter who has an M203, there is the 25lb radio, batteries, binos, NODs, spotter scope, MELIOS, and other ass't, but all important crap (like 5.56mm, 40mm, grenades, smoke, claymore, and the LBV that it hangs off, etc...) I have an small ruck that I g'd up just to tote around some of that junk on a stalk. Hell, I often think that the ghillie itself is a viscious joke that the Scotts have been laughing hystericaly about behind their kilts since WWI. But that is another piece of heresy for another day.
Ed Engler <Ed_Engler@softhome.net>
CP Greaves, ROK - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 05:19:24 (EST) 


aL oOOOOOOoooooHHHHHHHhhhhhhhhhh!,(AAAAAAaaaahhhhhh?)
 

I'm at 44.0 grains of Varget with just about everything under the sun in .308. I carefully worked up, as you did, with all projectiles and at 44.0 gr. my rifle just seems at its best.
With the 178 gr. National Matches I'm just begining to seem a very slight amount of flattening of the primers (at 85degrees F) and the groups seem pretty good considering my often spastic ability.
I use the same charge weight with the Sierra 175's and am getting real good results for a non 5-R factory barrel out to 200 yards which is the max. available to me.

Other powders are not a consideration to me at this time, Varget is less temp. sensitive and meters great through my geriatric uniflo. If you have not hit their web page (via Links page) do so and look at the testing they did with regards to temp and pressures. Great Stuff.

If I do go to another powder it will be VihtaVuori N-500/550 series its the only possible alternative according to my research. Coffees up time to go!

peteR
 

peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
YAWN-CITY, bY-GaWd USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 09:14:28 (EST) 


Ed. loved your comment... Hell, I often think
that the ghillie itself is a viscious joke that the Scotts have been laughing hystericaly about behind their kilts since WWI. But that is another piece of heresy for another day."
'specially when, with a $300 doller IR viewer, they stand out like a Ho-Jo's on an interstate.
Pablito.
Paul "Pablito" Coburn <condor@mags.net>
USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 09:20:07 (EST) 
Kodiak,
If you stay 600yds or under the 1/4 Min clicks are fine but if you shoot past 600 yards you start doing a lot of clicking to get out where you need to be. The biggest avantage to the "One turn" scope is when you have to engage multiple targets at unknown ranges with some being in the 300 to 400yd range then have one out there at 800 or 1000yds then back to 450yds. When you get done spinning the dial you wont know where your at then put yourself under pressure after running for a mile or two over rough terrain in 100defree heat and....OOPs sorry I was having a Wyoming flash back...Seriously that course is the best proving ground for what works in a tactical situation because you engage targets at unknown ranges fromm 300 to plus 1000yds and there not big either!! The M3 LR paid for itself out there and made a believer out of me.

Jeff A,
The "FAT BARRELL" is headed home!!! Just talked to the smith last night. Now if it would just get above "0" so I could shoot it.I got some more loading data from Hornady for the 260 drop me your address and I'll send it to you.
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 09:31:33 (EST) 


ACHTUNG !

I will be at the Shot Show in Atlanta, and some of you have already mailed me that you can make it there as well. What about a get together ? We could hit a Steak House or something and BS a little.

I´ll impact in Atlanta on Saturday 30th around 18:00 and eject again on Thursday 4th at 21:00.

Any takers ?

"ENDE"
Torsten <lasercon@dialup.globe.de>
G3ermany - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 10:58:29 (EST) 


Re: Ghillies, It might help to remember tat the ghillie was used by the GAME WARDENS to interdict poachers and was primarily used in a static position. That being said.....the military used it in a different manner and some parts of the military have overdone it. If possible get some of the military camo netting and try working just with it. It's lighter and even though its not the "thing" for everywhere, it can help.

Have "max'd" out at 45 grs Varget with 168 and 175 moly'd Sierras. 'Course both barrels and chambers are a bit "tight" so that load works for me. In another shooters Rem 308PSS, we have found that 43.7 gives him the accuracy out to 500. Whatever works for you !!

I like Torstens idea for the SHOT show, IF he comes through for me(hint hint)!!! I'll be in Atlanta on the 1st mid-day, Copy that JEFF ?? Long enough post, need to make another pot of coffee 'fore i head to the woods. ONLY 28 degrees here in SUNNY AL !!!
OUT HERE !!
Will <willadams@mindspring.com>
USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 13:40:16 (EST) 


Is there a good mail-order source for optics, Badger Ordnance rings, etc.? Thanks
Stroker <nitaikoruna@worldnet.att.net>
LaCrosse, FL USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 13:40:30 (EST) 
Dick, I was saying don't use a sling FOR a carry strap. Use it only for position shooting and not to haul the rifle with. that help?
Scott <xring>
USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 16:41:31 (EST) 
Jeff: Sorry to here about your father. I've been there; 10 years ago and I still think about him everyday. So will you - I'm sure!

D.West: Yes, Mr. West. I did get my Mil-Dot Master from Santa, but he got a little miffed when I took a crack a Rudolf on Christmas eve. Guess he won't be coming back here next year - that fat little bastard.

Torsten: Good luck getting around in Atlanta. You will find out real quick that Atlanta ain't Deutschland. Come up north a little "und ich habe gute deutsche bier!" Ja! Ja! I'll keep it warm for you, just like they do in Dusseldorf und Hamburg.

Will: 43.7 sound like a good compromise on the Varget powder. Still a littl eunsure about the 4064 and pushing it past published Sierra limits.

peteR: Last night the AAAAAAAaaaahhhhhhhh was not a question. If was a statement of fact - if you follow my drift.

Thanks to all with the help about the powder. And Sarge!! Where the hell have you been hiding.

al o. ( Just so nobody confuses me with al b. in the Big Apple.)
Al Ostapowicz <aaostapowicz@worldnet.att.net>
Everything is frozen up here in -2 degree , Ohio USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 16:42:32 (EST) 


RE: SHOT Show/Atlanta

We Atlantans need to designate a social coordinator for this event, i.e., someone who can coordinate when to get together for the Sniper Dinner, and hotels.

If it is warranted, I could work with some of the Hotels in the College Park (ATL Airport) area to see if we can get you guys a good rate. Let me know.

If we can get enough folks, I could probably arrange a reception room for a social one night. The only night that I am gonna be tied up is the night of the Glock reception...

RE: Savage vs. Remington

Triggers: Savage sucks...End of Statement. Even with the adjustability, it is difficult to get a Savage trigger close to a Remington that is properly adjusted.

Barrels: They vary in both guns. So far, one of the best shooting guns that I have shot was a 110FP in 7 Rem. Mag. 3/4 inches at 200!

But, I have found both brands to be very individualistic. Each individual gun has a different personality. I have shot good Savages, and bad ones. Same with the Remington.

Later,

Bruce
Bruce Braxton <braxton1@aol.com>
College Park P.D., GA USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 17:09:06 (EST) 


Bach...

"At a recent gun show, a guy was selling U.S. military smoke grenades and white parachute flares. Are these things legal to buy, i.e. does the military ever dispose of such items to civilians?"

Yes they are legal to own, but check your local laws... most don't care but places like New York City might not like it.

The military disposes of these types of articals by "DATE"!
After a date (like milk) they are sold at auction... to business' and
individuals.
Pablito.
Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 17:36:02 (EST) 


Hello, everyone, just checking in.

The Stoner is still working well after about 600 rounds. I've been warned by people here that they've been known to develop wandering zero problems by now, but no sign of that yet (knock on wood). One of the guys at work has bought himself a SR-25 and one of Leupold's new long-distance scopes, but I haven't talked him into coming out to the tactical rifle match yet. (See "Sacramento Snipers" article.)

I came in first place in December's match, the second time I've done that. In January's, we had fog to where you couldn't see the berm from the 200-yard line. We put up half-sized sillhouettes and moved the firing line back and forth to positions where we could barely make out the targets. The B&L Tactical scope worked well, sometimes getting off aimed shots when others couldn't tell the targets were there. I cross-shot on one target and came up 5 points short of first place, drat.

We have a real-live military sniper from an Army Rangers unit who has shown up at our match the last 3 months. He claims to have been on active duty in Somalia and Bosnia.

I ordered a drag bag/shooting mat from Eagle Industries. After I was told it was out of stock and would take a month and a half to arrive, the darn thing showed up on my doorstep a week later. I am thoroughly delighted with the design and workmanship of this case, thanks for the recommendations from Sniper Country. The Stoner is a tight fit, but the end result is much easier to handle than the factory case. I can't wait to put it to field use.

Tactical Firearms Training Team (http://www.tftt.com) will be holding a 3-day optical rifle course at the Sacramento range the last weekend in February, including camoflauge and stalking. Drop me a note if you're interested.
Grasshopper <wd6cmu@netcom.com>
Richmond, CA USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 17:47:13 (EST) 


This subject has been covered in this column but I do not have hours of free time to comb through the archives. Please give all problems assciated with Springfield scopes. All I am looking for are short answers that are to the point!!!!!
JimC <joe.largy@wang.com>
Billerica, ma USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 18:02:26 (EST) 
I've been reading the Remington/Savage posts and decided to add the results of some testing over the holidays. The Savage was a short action Tatical in .223, new out of the box, and the PSS was very slightly used .223. 30 shots using three powders and a 52 gr Seirra match averaged .61 in the Savage and 20 shots averaged .53 in the PSS.
(Try dividing the accuracy difference into the price difference?)The Savage was cleaned between groups and 1 fouling shot fired. Accuracy wise the Savage is hard to beat for the money,IF you're looking only for an everyday gun with good accuracy. The accuracy difference alone alone was nominal and at least partially the result of the heavy trigger in the Savage. Workmanship, trigger, after market stuff, etc. all favor Remington. So it seems to me that if you want to shoot it "as is" the Tactical is a good buy and you could put the money in the scope. If you want to add on, customize, etc. (basic issue gun nut) consider the PSS and the extra cost. The .300 Win Mag Tactical we tested also shot very well and averaged around an inch with hunting bullets and a shooter shooting his first magnum. The conclusion was "they ain't elegant or fancy but they will shoot!" Woe be it to the prairie dog, elk, or bad guy in the cross hairs if the shooter does his part. We all have our priorities, perspectives, and budgets, but the Tacticals seem to be a good option.

Barry Chance <Barry_Chance@maxtor.com>
Longmont, CO USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 18:52:30 (EST) 


Fantastic site, I visit often. Has anyone out there heard of bedding the first 1 3/4 inches of the underside of the barrel on a sniper rifle? The U.S. Marines do this on their M40A1's as well as the folks at Texas Brigade Armory. They call it a barrel pad. Mike Lau says in his book that this is done because the Remington Action can flex a few thousands because of the weight of a heavy barrel. I was told by a friend in the USMC that Remington actually did a test long ago and found that they acheived the best accuracy from the M40A1's when bedding the first 1 3/4" of the barrel. I am currently building up a rifle with a McMillan stock and I'm considering having it bedded this way. I'm a little worried about barrel harmonics since I've previously read that nothing should touch any part of the barrel.

Speaking of bedding, has anyone used marine tex to bed a stock before? McMillan uses the stuff exclusively and so does the USMC.
Any comments would be welcome.

Thanks and sorry for the long post.
Pat <Autothority@Erols.com>
Ashburn, VA USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 19:16:42 (EST) 


FYI to those interested in a PSS. Ebay.com has two new in box PSS's for sale. One is currently at $635 and one is at $650. Go to Ebay.com and search under "PSS".

Bolt <mbolt34547@aol.com>
USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 20:54:43 (EST) 


Hi Guys! Been kind of busy lately, developing a moly-coated drag bag.
Paul J. Headlee <pheadlee@networksplus.net>
Ogden, KS USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 23:00:16 (EST) 
A pet load of mine is FED GM 308 case, FED 210M primer, 44.6 IMR 4064, 168 Berger VLD moly, OAL of 2.8410. Out of a stock 20" REM 700 mountain rifle barrel I get 3/4 MOA at 2635fps. +/- 7fps. Out of a 24" match grade Krieger barrel I get 1/2 or better MOA at 2710 +/- 10fps. All components have been uniformed, trimmed, and weighted. Velocities are averages of averages chronographed mostly at temps of 75 degrees below 500 feet. Rounds have only been fired to 300 yds but appear to be consistent. I asked previously if anyone has played with 30-378 WBY loads. I've tried H1000, RL22 and IMR7828 all with 180 gr Nosler silver tips and FED 215M primers. Best group (5/8") is with 7828. Has anybody used 50BMG? Since this is special order and only comes in 5lb containers I don't want to waste time and money. The rifle is not a stock WBY. Its a MarkV action with a canjar trigger and a 27" heavy Shilen match grade barrel with fluting and brake, bedded in a McMillan McHale stock with US Optics scope, rings and mount. Weight is about 13-14 lbs. Thanks..Tony
Tony Y.
Iselin, NJ USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 23:05:54 (EST) 
I am looking for any information on any studies on shooting of weapons out of the hands of a suspect....any actual incidents, studies, etc. I plan to do a research project regarding this type of activity to better educate the L.E. community on the pro's and con's of this type of situation.....thanks
C.Donn Swanbom II <swanbom@aol.com>
USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 23:20:34 (EST) 
Gentleman,

I'm looking for info on mil. surplus ammo cal. 30-06 headstamped FN 58 bullet weight, vel., corrosive or not any help would be great.
Daniel <hinesd@gators.net>
Lacrosse, FL USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 23:28:10 (EST) 



Re: Weaver cold weather test

Last night I put an AR-15 with a Weaver KT-15 scope in the backyard for a good cold soak. This morning it was minus 4° F. and provide a good test of the AR (lubed with LSA) and scope. The rifle worked fine, but the Weaver didn't care for the cold. The normally usable clicks were non-existent. Couldn't feel or hear anything. How do the better Leupolds hold up in "brisk" weather?
Food for thought.

Once someone commented that the Weaver KTs have a spring type vibration in them upon impact or firing a shot. He was correct. Don't know if it matters though. I had never noticed it on an AR-15 which is prone to the action spring noise and vibration.

Ron N. <rcn8@accnorwalk.com>
USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 23:44:54 (EST) 


Happy New Year everyone!

Been out for a while, New Years eve was pretty rough, but I stopped by for a look see on what I've been missing.

Mike from Cal,

An H-S stock is foam filled, it's a urethane foam with milled fiberglass mix, and is surrounded by a layer of graphite, kevlar, and laminated fiberglass, which is then coated with another urethane shell. Now to install your own cheek piece, whether or not you are qualified, would break my heart as I probably made the damn thing depending on how long ago you got it. Plus inside that foam is an aluminum bedding block which goes from forend past the palmswell clear into the butt, probably a couple inches shy of the recoil pad. I have made the adjustable stocks, cheek piece and LOP, and we use aluminum inserts to hold everything in place inside the stock, AND we have to trim the bedding block so everything will fit. Now if I was going to spend the time and money on an adjustable stock, I'd just call H-S and order one. Take it easy everybody.
 

JR <mrpink@rapidnet.com>
Rapid City, SD USA - Wednesday, January 06, 1999 at 01:04:46 (EST) 


Tony Y,
Although I'm sure that I'm not the only one here, but I've played around some with a L.A.R. 50.BMG single-shot. What do ya want to know? For a 30/378, check with Russ Taylor.

Al O.
Ok, I forgot to add the "O" to your name. You never can tell when Al B. might be lurking around the Roster, but ya gotta love-em!
 

D. West
USA - Wednesday, January 06, 1999 at 05:36:58 (EST) 


Pat,
There are several schools of thought on bedding actions. Some bed out under the barrel and some don't. I like to bed under the barrel for an inch or two with the heavy barrel's because I believe that the heavy barrel can put a bind on the action. I also only bed the recoil lug area and the rear tang some people bed the entire action. I leave the area between the front of the action and the tang "Free floated" and this is a lot the same way an action is when its pillar bedded. It sets on the area of bedding at the screws and the rest of the action is not touching anything. I have found no difference in accuracy doing it one way or the other with a pad or with out a pad. I think if you have a good job of bedding and you have a good rifle it will shoot better than most of us can hold it. The Marine Tex is very good bedding materal bu expensive. Devcon Plastic steel works just as well. Hope this helps to answer your question there probably isn't a right or wrong just what ever you smith perfers. Maybe Ron can give you a better answer.
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Wednesday, January 06, 1999 at 09:33:08 (EST) 
Swanborn II, There was an incident a couple of years ago that was discussed here where a police man took out a gun. It was the contention here (to save scouring archives) that it was a bad precident given the fact that future lawyers would probably adopt the idea and question LE snipers who did not attempt to shoot the weapon. I personally think that is well founded in good thought. There might be a senerio where that would be an option but probably as an established procedure it sucks!
Pat: I do attempt to bed a couple inches ahead of the lug for the reasons Pat Bullet gave you! but I must say it is almost impossible to tell the difference given that other factors have so much bearing.
I do one thing a little different though. Mr. Bullet seems to bed first whereas I do everything else I can do to stabilize the system before I bed it. I frankly don't know which way is best. I'm sure that Pat's method is faster and results in a good shooting gun quicker than mine. Often I do things that are nullified by the bedding later so it would be hard to argue my method is correct except that I hopefully might find some unknown problem that might indeed be hidden and reduced by the bedding process to the point I wouldn't know about it.
Ron N. that's very commendable you would test you equipment before finding out the hard way.(as I usually do) I think you will find the Leupolds are quite good in cold weather. I have never experienced anything except a little tightness on VarX II models(no clicks on it).
VarX III units I've had are not affected normally except for fogging on the outside.
B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Wednesday, January 06, 1999 at 10:48:28 (EST) 
To: Barry Chance

I agree on most of the points you make regarding Savage rifles.

When I ordered my 112FV .223 I did so because the rifle was very affordable,reasonably accurate, and because I wanted a faster twist rate (Savage has 1/9 twist) than what other manufactures were offering (example,Remington has 1/12 twist) so that I can shoot heavier .224 cal bullet weights.

You are correct that the Remington has the advantage when it comes to overall selection when it comes to aftermarket products.However,this situation is changing.More and more suppliers are producing aftermarket goodies for the Savages and the prices are comparable to what you would pay for other rifles such as Remington.

I certainly wouldn't buy a Savage with the intention on upgrading the overall rifle to the quality of a PSS.Heck,I'd just buy a PSS and be done with it even if it didn't have the twist rate I wanted.

But on the other hand if I was interested in building a rifle with the intention on customizing it I would personally would want to start out with the most economical barrel/action that was of acceptable accuracy potential.In other words, I wouldn't buy a PSS over a Savage to do this.Unless of course I wanted a Remington in the first place (been there, done that) in which case I'd probably buy a Varmint Special with laminate stock.

Just some food for thought.

To:Ron N.

Ron, did you notice any accuracy difference when the rifle was that cold ? If so,approximately how much? Good point about the scope being finicky about the cold.I think I'll try that myself.
Jeff Babineau <2jeff@blaikies.ns.ca>
Truro, N.S. Canada - Wednesday, January 06, 1999 at 11:04:23 (EST) 


JR, glad to see you commenting here!

By the way, I believe H.S. now offers to upgrade the standard PSS stock with the new adjustable cheek rest for around $100. This would certainly be worth it for those who want a higher rest but do not want to 100mph tape a pad to the rifle. Also, the factory job will obviously be very well done when compared to some "home brew" solutions. Just thought I'd past this on.

JR, thanks again for the low down on the HS construction.
Scott <xring@voicenet.com>
USA - Wednesday, January 06, 1999 at 11:36:16 (EST) 


We just saw the results of cold weather on sight clicks. What can we learn from other's experiences shooting in very cold weather.

We know cold air (that is not 'thin wind') is denser. What effect does this have on ballistics? Sea level performance in the summer is one thing, what about the depths of winter?

From the scope test, we know springs and lubes behave slower in the cold. What effect does this have on rifles? Are there any rifles that won't work in the cold - semi autos, high spec' rifles?

We know fingers and muscles dislike the cold. What is the effect on the shooter?

Finally, condensation from breathing will fog eyepieces (know this from experience). What can be done to avoid this?

Terry Warner <twarner@sk.sympatico.ca>
minus 36 degrees with a slight breeze, Canada - Thursday, January 07, 1999 at 09:08:05 (EST) 


Barry Chance,

A most excellence post dude!

But,

I believe the bretheren is interested in first round accuracy w/o fouling shots. If you discount the first round fired, you're only fooling yourself. What is most often called a Cold Barrel Shot and it can't be "Bogus" in the real world.

What was the deviation from the intended point of impact for Remington vs. Savage?

Maybe a repeat test without cleaning the barrel between strings, or fouling shots could provide more most excellent enlightenment to all of us.

Shoot what you got, and shoot it (precisely) lots.

Paul H, Moly Coated DRAG BAG! DUUUDEEEE! Where can I get One!
 

peteR
peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
tHAwING-oUT cItY, bY-gAWd USA - Thursday, January 07, 1999 at 09:37:16 (EST) 


Fogging on Scope lenses:

A few winters ago we had it as bad as you now, with temps in -20°C. I had my breath, or just the condensation of my body forming ice flowers on the lens during a hunting trip.

My quick fix was one of my long socks into which I slipped one of those small heat bags for warm toes. I tied the sock in an O and used it as a lens cover with the warm toaster bag in the rear.
Presto, warm objective, and no more condensation.
This year, if it ever gets cold, I try just taping the bag to the outside of the objective, may warm the lens that way?

Try it and tell me about it, but dont heat up the lens to quick or it may fracture.

"ENDE"
Torsten <lasercon@dialup.globe.de>
G3ermany - Thursday, January 07, 1999 at 09:40:16 (EST) 


Terry - On eyepiece/scopes fogging up (external). Here is what I came up with when attending the Army course in January.

1. Use RainX anti-fog on the eyepiece and Regular RainX on the objective.
2. Avoid a wide brimmed hat and thick ghillie veil. Just the heat from your head can fog up the eyepiece.
3. Breath out your nose as much as possible. It directs the hot moist air from your lungs away from the scope.
4. Try to avoid moving the weapon from warm indoors to cold outdoors a lot. In the Marines we used to try to use a cold room to store weapons in cold weather to keep condensation down. When living in an arctic tent with a yukon stove or such, keep weapons behind the frost liner if the tent has one.

Weapons operation in the cold. Its more of a lubrication thing than anything else. For semi-auto's use 3-in-one oil, with bolt guns white lithium grease has worked for me. Moly lube?

We are in the short strokes on the data book.

Later

gooch <gooch@stormmountain.com>
Elk Garden, WV USA - Thursday, January 07, 1999 at 10:00:15 (EST) 


Gooch I learned something from your Rain Ex post. Fogging is not much of a problem here. Just the Surf Board dust. I have got to find a good sweat shop to make the slings my hands hurt like hell from this sewing. Next it will be dishpan hands.

Well off to shoot my Rifle and see if I should be using Varget instead of the 4064 I have been using for years. Varget is alot eaiser to measure for sure.

I'm back to using non Molly in my sniper rifle. First round from a clean bbl is to erratic for me. I have heard about leaving a fouling shot but that just rubs the grain the wrong way to leave a rifle dirty.

To who asked about Marine Tex and who said it was expensive. It is a great bedding compound and cost $6.00 for 1/2 pint in Calif. That seems cheap to me. You can do alot of rifles with 1/2 pint. A quart is $13.00 and that will go bad before it is used. Mike
Mike M. <DMMDNLN@AOL.COM>
Calif USA - Thursday, January 07, 1999 at 11:33:52 (EST) 


PeteR,
Thanks, you're correct first round shots are essential. Unfortunately, I was breaking in the barrel and haven't got around to really understanding this rifle yet. The one round fouling shots were after cleaning and all on a different target and grouped well. I didn't transpose them over the test targets to see where they actually grouped as far as first round zero. I will do that on my next range visit. My first round zeros tend to vary a lot from rifle to rifle. My 40x's are very consistent. One interesting thing which I didn't realize until too late is when I retested some loads another day I didn't have the same zero!(?) I don't think it was the wind or mirage because it was fairly calm and only 100yds. So now I have two things to check out, first shot zero, and the ability to maintain it day to day. Damn, if I just didn't have this real job that interfered with the important stuff.
Barry Chance <Barry_Chance@maxtor.com>
Longmont, Co USA - Thursday, January 07, 1999 at 11:39:53 (EST) 
To All: Those of you that subscribe to either "Precision Shooting" or "Tactical Shooter" may have noticed an announcement recently that the noted artist Lee Teter (famous for the painting of a veteran at the Wall entitled "Reflections") had done a painting of Carlos Hathcock and that it was to be available in a limited edition print. Upon calling the art studio that was to handle them, I learned the print effort has been shelved by the artist for now due to criticism of some aspects of the painting.

I am asking that any of you out there who may be interested in one of these prints please phone Wayne Stallings at the Imagine Art Studio in Smithville, VA (1-800-303-9003) and express your desire that Lee Teter reconsider his position and press forward with this artwork.

I believe the final view of what is correct in the painting should be determined by the artist, Carlos, and his son Carlos III. For those of us that respect and honor this man, the opportunity to purchase a quality print of him as he would choose to be remembered should not be compromised by anyones "commitee" of critics.

Hopefully most of you will agree and we can get Lee to complete the work for printing.
Fred Fischer <frederick_c_fischer@mail.northgrum.com>
People's Rep. of, MD USA - Thursday, January 07, 1999 at 13:10:23 (EST)


Mike M: Your comments re: MarineTex were right on target. This is an outstanding product that has incredible versatility. I would not hesitate to use it for bedding compound on actions, pillars, etc. The only limiting factor for it in some areas is the high viscosity and its thixotropic (ability to retain form in an uncured state) nature. This can make it difficult to flow and eliminate air pockets depending on where it is applied. It can be filled with powdered metal additives if desired, drilled, filed, sanded, etc. Besides that, it is reasonably priced and available in virtually any marine supply store. Great stuff. Great tip.
Fred Fischer
People's Rep. of, MD USA - Thursday, January 07, 1999 at 13:29:03 (EST) 
Just got in my Starlight case (O.D. Green) this AM. The case looks bomb-proof !! I am NOT going to see how much intentional abuse it can take as Sarge did but it will get a work out. Plenty of room for TWO rifles if you think about the layout BUT I am going to keep just ONE rifle, One Leupold spotting scope, 8x30 Steiners binocs, range book,and a small cleaning kit (also a Leatherman tool) inside and then "toss" it into the back of my '64 Chevy stepside truck!! Oh yeah, will see if I can fit 100 rds in there somewhere. The inner construction is smart....eggshell foam on top (glued-in) and FOUR pieces of foam, 2 of differing thicknesses to mix & match ....while I didn't get a knife with my case ,I did use one of the many knives my wife says I have too much of!! Yeah, Riiiight !!!! How can a guy have too many knives or rifles ?? So far have just set in the Rem 700V and its Leupold 4.5x14 TActical (early version)....will keep all updated. So far it is THE BEST DEAL GOING for a rifle case As far as any I have seen.
Thanks, Brack...keep up the good work !! See you at the SHOT Show !!
OUT HERE
Will <willadams@mindspring.com>
Sweet Home, ALABAMA USA - Thursday, January 07, 1999 at 16:44:53 (EST) 
Log onto this and cast your vote. Another CNN / HCI Gun Control Opinion Poll

http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/1998/guns/overview/

J.D.
J.D. Hicks <hicks@zso.dec.com>
Seattle, WA USA - Thursday, January 07, 1999 at 17:20:08 (EST) 


Just cast my vote on the CNN site. If you have trouble getting in, shorten the address to end with "specials".

There may be hope for the American people yet (at least those with internet access). The question was, "Should gun manufacturers be held liable .....etc."

When I voted, the vote results came up as follows:

Total Votes: 14736
Yes votes: 1197 (8%)
No Votes: 12950 (88%)
Sometimes: 598 (4%)

Cast your vote!
Bruce N. Robinson <bnrobins@flash.net>
Los Lunas, NM USA - Thursday, January 07, 1999 at 18:07:46 (EST) 


What surprises me even more - how can someone in their right mind even consider blaming gun manufacturers for injuries, etc - in the first place.... Come on folks, get it together.... (not you folks, those other wackos).

Ken :)

NoVaShooter <Ken@aspire.net>
Nokesville, Va USA - Thursday, January 07, 1999 at 18:32:28 (EST) 


A little help please. What's the story on Turret Tagz? I read one entry in "Hot Tips and Cold Shots" about them but could not find anything else about them on this website. Thanks in advance for the response.

CG
Curious George
emerald, WA USA - Thursday, January 07, 1999 at 18:34:51 (EST) 


I am a thirteen year old shooter. I am interested in being a sniper when I get older. I guess I'm a pretty good shot, I can do a two-inch grouping from 100 yards. I own a .243 and help my dad reload bullets. I clean the pirmer pockets and have made my own set of match bullets before. I guess that all my teachers would think I was wierd if I said that I wanted to be a sniper but that's what I want to do. I enjoy reading a lot of things about snipers and I own the movie Sniper which I watch about nine million times a day. If you have any interesting information please E-mail it to me.
Big Sniper <wofmagazine@juno.com>
Ninety Six, SC USA - Thursday, January 07, 1999 at 18:59:50 (EST) 
How is a Savage 12BVSS in 308 ?
Bob Fontano Member M.C.L. Sunrise Rifle team <Bggun1775@aol .comN.>
islipterrace , N.Y. USA - Thursday, January 07, 1999 at 19:19:14 (EST) 
Hey out there I just have a simple question that Im sure one of you shooting geniuses out there will know right off. I shoot a stock Rem. 700 VS in .308, the trigger out of the box sucks. My AR's have as good. It almost seems as if it is a single stage trigger, is this the case? Can I adjust the lengh of pull to get a true
.308 gunner <CGarr23113@aol.com>
somewhere, Ca USA - Thursday, January 07, 1999 at 21:21:51 (EST) 
In addition to previous message. Can I adjust this trigger myself with my somewhat average gunsmithing skills to be a true "two stage" trigger? If so what is the procedure and what is requirded? Any help will be greatly appreciated.
.308 gunner <CGarr23113@aol.com>
somewhere, Ca USA - Thursday, January 07, 1999 at 21:28:23 (EST) 
Well Big Sniper; Your probably going to get a lecture from one of the board members that operate this site about the fact that you seem to have ignored the warning about being 18 years of age to enter here. Now that is none of my business since I'm not involved in the management of the site and quite honestly I don't like it all that it is politically incorrect for an Old Geezer like me to encourage you in something that might result in your taking someone's life with a rifle. I find it commendable that you and your dad are involved in shooting and are interested in the art of making a bullet go where you want it too. There are many misguided kids in this country that are trying to do the same thing for the purpose of conducting gang warfare and I trust that is not your case. Your are quite correct to assume that your teachers will think it unusual to the point you would probably be recommended for counseling should you let it be known that you watch "Sniper" over and over. Now my friend I want you to know that I do not. But you do realize that society is not made up of folk like me. One of the best traits of a Sniper is that he is a bit on the Covert (secret) side about what he does and he doesn't brag it around. Sniping involves a lot of things that Hollywood doesn't tell you. I'm not going to lecture you but your interest may change when you find out the whole truth. It is really quite boring most of the time and very uncomfortable all the time followed by a period of shear terror after the shot. Did it go right? Will I be discovered and wiped out? Will I be prosecuted? Did I kill the hostage? You may be called upon to risk your life and most likely will never receive as much as a thank you. Remember the Mission impossible thing? If you get caught they don't know you! If your in Law Enforcement and you make a mistake they don't know you either!
The moral here my friend is "Be careful what you wish for...Cause you might get it." On the other hand enjoy your rifle and stay close to your dad! This is the best time of your life. Keep on shooting and learning and if it is a Sniper you be you will know it! A real good Sniper would not have MISSED that thing about being 18 years old though! Good Luck and what ever you do! Do it with honor and commitment to Freedom and right and you will be successful and happy.
IF things get too heavy though mail us off line and we'll try to help!
B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Thursday, January 07, 1999 at 21:48:15 (EST) 
Big Sniper, AKA (under 18 years old)

There's a article here at Sniper Country just for you.
Click onto (ARTICLES AND COMMENTARY)
Then click on (COMMENTARY)
Now click on (SO YOU WANT TO BE A SNIPER)

It's not going to taste too good, but it's what you're looking for.
And for God's sake, stay in school!!!
D. West <westforce@juno.com>
Oh, so cold here, in IL. USA - Thursday, January 07, 1999 at 22:10:29 (EST) 


.308 GUNNER,

i GOT KINDA CONFUSED wITH tHE DOUBLE POST, AIN'T NONE OF US GENIUSES, JUST HUNTERS N' SHOOTERS SHARING COLLECTIVE WISDOM AND EXPERIENCES GATHERED IN THE FIELD, DUDE!

un-DUDE: Once you get "Varget'ed", I doubt you'll go back, EVER!
Sweatshops, HA! Gooch has got to have plenty of free time on his hands, and everybody knows West Virginians are good at manual labor! That banjo plucking toughens the fingers FAST.

Barry, Go!-Baby!-Go! Now you're tracking that Cold Barrel Shot!
 

Jeff A,
Bubba get you? You been cooped up with Babs again? Got any of the Hornady 178's yet? ANSWER ME!!!

Pat(MrBullet) ibid Hornady 178's? pLEASE?

X-ring: Attempting "conversion" in AM when I can clearly read instruction manual! :-o

Chao for Now, Dudes

peteR
peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
BIG-CITY, bY-GAwD USA - Thursday, January 07, 1999 at 22:14:20 (EST) 


308 Gunner - The Rem factory trigger ISN"T intended to be a 2-stage setup. Sure you can give it more creep, but why ??? Take barrel out of stock....get some spray carburetor cleaner or "Gun Scrub" and hose down the trigger assembly !! Make sure the trigger is in a position to drain. Then use some synthetic oil like "Militec" or your favorite flavor and LIGHTLY lube the trigger !!! You can adjust the creep and weight but be aware if you do then the warranty is voided, thats why they have the lacquer over the screws !!! You could dis-assemble the trigger but thats a real pain in the *ss. If you have the money to spare.....buy a "Timney" or "Canjar"...good to go !!

After cruising thru some of the other sites SC has links to, I see that drag bags aren't cheap !!! Why not use a military drop bag and save yourself some $$$$$$ ?? I think Brigade Quartermaster has them for about $40 and then you can modify to suit your needs. I suppose if your dragbag has to perform double duty and be a shooting mat also then you might have a problem but ...over at Ft Benning they have some at "Ranger Rags" (surplus store) and they run $15-25. Made of canvas, heavy canvas, and has a felt inner padding. Just a thought, may not be as "cute - high speed" as some of those bags but it darn sure works !!
OUT HERE
Will <willadams@mindspring.com>
Awake in, AL USA - Friday, January 08, 1999 at 04:14:26 (EST) 


>The following was taken from the Opinion page of the Savannah Morning
>News, 23 December 1998.
>
> "In a move straight out of a "Saturday Night Live" skit, the Department
> of Defense on Monday announced it was upset with politically incorrect
> graffiti scribbled on one of the bombs dropped on Iraq last week.
> Pentagon officials saw an Associated Press photo taken during the
> four-day bombing campaign that showed a 2000-pound laser-guided bomb on the
> aircraft carrier USS Enterprise in the Persian Gulf with an inscription
> that said, "Here's a Ramadan present from Chad Rickenberg."
>
> The Clinton administration was not amused at this breach of bombing
> etiquette. "Department of Defense officials were distressed to learn of
> thoughtless graffiti mentioning the holy month of Ramadan written on a
> piece of U.S. ordnance during Operation Desert Fox" in Iraq, chief Pentagon
> spokesman Kenneth Bacon said in a statement Monday. "Religious intolerance
> is an anathema to Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen and to all
> Americans who cherish the right to worship freely," he added. "The United
> States deeply respects Islam."
>
> Imagine the nerve of some sailor insulting Moslems right before
> they're bombed, maimed and killed. It is irrelevant whether the victims
> could read the graffiti as the bombs plummeted toward their homes.
>
> Clearly what counts is the expression of the offending thought, not the
>fact that
> people are being blown to smithereens.
> Although the Geneva Convention is silent on this matter, we salute the
> Pentagon for insisting on politically correct bombings. We suggest in
> the future that all U.S. armed forces paint yellow smiley faces on all
> ordnance and adopt as its official wartime slogan: It's not personal, it's
> just business."

Torsten <lasercon@dialup.globe.de>
G3ermany - Friday, January 08, 1999 at 06:36:33 (EST) 


Torsten...
"It's not personal, it's just business." (Loved your post...)

You foreign guys out there just don't understand the current America.
It's not what we "DO" that counts, it's what we "SAY" about what we do that counts...
It didn't count that we messed up in Somalia... we felt their (the Somalians) PAIN! (but somehow, not the pain of our own military).
And when we bomb an aspirin factory... it's important to understand that our leader "Feels their pain"... as he gives the workers an "Excedren Headache!"
And as the bombs fall on the Muslems, kneeling in prayer, our fearless leader, "Feels their pain", and must show respect.

"It's not personal, it's just business.", just like his love life.

Paul "Pablito" Coburn <condor@mags.net>
USA - Friday, January 08, 1999 at 07:11:33 (EST) 


peteR,
I haven't played with the 178s yet I have 168 and 155 A-Maxs but I haven't had a chance to play around with them either. Jr. delt me out of my "Tack driver" and it was a great test bed, it shot everything well. The 168s look like 190s I know you would never be able to load mag length and touch the rifling. They look like they would fly forever and I've heard good things about them.

Bill R,
Good Post and well said you didn't beat up on him but he should have gotten the idea.

Torsten & Paul
You two should work as a team for the "Policically correct". Torsten could do the releases and Paul you could explain them!! That way all of us misguided and misunderstood "Red Neck Gun Owners" could be accepted by the "Policically correct public".

Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Friday, January 08, 1999 at 07:55:32 (EST) 


J.D. Hicks and Bruce N. Robinson: I voted. Thanks. What about the rest of you?

peteR: I don't have any production models ready yet but you can make your own at home. Get an Army duffel bag (the cotton one, not the new nylon type) and about 5 pounds of molybdenum disulfide (pharmaceutical grade). Put the duffel bag in your clothes dryer, dump in the moly and turn it on. The permanent press cycle works best since it has a "cool-down" period like the Brady Bill. Man, I'm gonna be rich! Hope this doesn't double post.
Paul J. Headlee <pheadlee@networksplus.net>
Ogden, KS USA - Friday, January 08, 1999 at 08:07:12 (EST) 


To C.Donn Swanbom II: Unfortunately I do can not give any info on actual incidents, where a LE sniper would have shot a gun out of criminals hand. Still I would like to give a few comments:

If a sniper tries to shoot the weapon out of a hostage takers hand, there are several possible outcomes:

1) The gun is hit, and the hostage taker is overwhelmed by SWAT-people and nobody gets hurt big time. Not very likely.

2) The gun is hit, but due to the impact the gun fires and the hostage or a third party is hurt big time. Possible.

3) The rifle bullet hits the hand of the criminal, passes through bone and flehs and carries on at around 2300 fps and may hit somebody else. Also the criminal can still shoot wth the other hand. Very possible.

4) The sniper misses the hand ans criminal totally, but the passing bullet and sonic boom of it causes unvoluntary reflection in the criminal, his gun goes bang and the situation ends in full shoot out. This outcome most probably has happened many times.

I think that the threat to hostages and third parties are too big, when a sniper tries to shoot the gun out of a criminals hand. Therefore this method should never be an official tactic. A sniper may choose to use it, but only if he really knows how to do it. In the end he must live with the consuquences. Last but not least, if somebody is so big threat that he can be shot legally, then the sniper should try to maximize his stopping power and aim to more effective body parts than a weapon or hand.

Hexa
Hexa <heikki.juhola@telia.fi>
Helsinki, Finland - Friday, January 08, 1999 at 08:35:34 (EST) 


Another cold and nasty morning in SE Illinois. Contemplating a test of two sub-caliber pogo sticks and a Musgrave Palma rifle. With this kind of weather, the testing will have to wait!

Several days past, I mentioned the use of 175 Sierra MK's in my machine rest. Sorry that I didn't back up the good results of those bullets with a load. Since the loads were not mine, I can take no credit for the superb accuracy.

As stated, the barrel was a 1 in 13" .298 - .3065 Krieger. The chamber was Obermeyer. The OAL in each case 2.80" to conform with Palma rules. The first ten shots were from 1992 Palma cases, Federal 210M primers and 45 grains VV N-140 (non-moly). The second ten were in Rem. BR brass, Rem. 71/2 BR primers and, again, 45 grains of VV N-140 (non-moly). Both groups were little knots (1 1/4") at 500 yards. The first ten shots were not chronographed but the the second ten produced deviations well under 10. This last load was used by a friend at Cedar Springs, Ont. on labor day and a 900M comparison was made with the Sierra 155 Palma. The 155 Palma bullet, with a comparable load, used about two minutes less elevation at that distance. For those interested in Varget, the classic load for the 155 seems to be 45.3 grains. The VV N-140 load at about 46 grains.

I note considerable interest here with the Hornady bullets. While
I've only tested 168 and 180 light mag factory loads, it was superb
in the above mentioned barrel. In a Hart barreled 1 in 10" twist
M-700, this ammunition did not produce good results. Whether this
was due to twist or internal dimensions of the barrel, I haven't a clue.

Just some pre-breakfast Friday morning musing.
Bill Wylde <k9wxr@rr1.net>
SE, IL USA - Friday, January 08, 1999 at 09:24:41 (EST) 


Speaking of Drag bags: We will have a review of London Bridge Trading Company's LBT-1655 and LBT-0110 drag bags in a few weeks, maybe less. Also look for our review of Eagles' shooting matt/drag bag which should appear shortly thereafter.

All are great products. But as you pointed out, they are not cheap. On the other hand they do have unique features that would be hard to duplicate from scratch, the least being the quality of the stitching. By the time you were done, you might find the money invested was equal to the price of one of these bags! That being said, you can make a drag bag with a little effort. It ain't all that tough. Home built units usually lack external and internal pockets for storage of gear, but they do serve their primary role well, that of transporting the sniper rifle across rough terrain. What you get with a quality commercial drag bag purchased from a reputable company is a well constructed piece of gear that will last a lifetime. It will have a lot of well thought out features that allow you (especially police snipers) to store everything you need for a call out or short duration mission in one well organized sack. These bags are far superior to a padded canvas sock or a modified gun case. They ain't cheap...but in consolation, you do get what you pay for.

Commercial bags give you two basic choices. A simply and sturdy bag to transport the weapon, OR an elaborate back pack that will allow you to transport the weapon in addition to all the ancillary gear - food, scope, tripod, ammo, binos, water, ad nausea. You have to decide what you need before the final purchase. Humping a ruck and a drag bag is perfectly acceptable, but sometimes having a bag that can carry it all while leaving your hands free to carry a carbine or navigate mountainous terrain is pretty nice too. For police, having it all in one organized bag sure beats the heck out of taking the weapon in a hard case and having all the other gear in a separate carry all. One thing that does not work: using a basic drag bag as a carry all. There is no simple way to attach all the gear you would like to bring along to a bag with out extra compartments. You just can not have it both ways. Stuffing the gear in the main compartment with the rifle is also problematic as it can shift and beat the rifle up pretty good. For example, sticking your spotting scope in with the rifle is asking for trouble. Tying it outside just gets it lost. You NEED that external cargo pocket.
Scott <xring@voicenet.com>
USA - Friday, January 08, 1999 at 10:01:00 (EST) 


WYLDE THANG,

a most excellent post, please let us know when you get some Hornadys (and time) to play with them! Your input would be a most valuable asset to us shooting pilgrims.

Paul H.
It Worked, It Really worked! Drag bag is now moly coated, so are uniforms, WIFEY'S UNDIES, my underwear, socks, kids clothes, We're now a genuine High Speeeeed/Loooooow Drag kinda family! THANKS DUDE!

Sarge, snowed in? Was ist los?
 

Time to trade the Banjo for a snow shovel 6"plus on ground n still going.

Torsten, You Da'Spin Doktorr. I have no doubts, Billy Bob can use you!
peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
SNOW CITY, bY-gAwD USA - Friday, January 08, 1999 at 11:47:39 (EST) 


I just purchased an HK SR9. I have not been able to find any accuracy data on this rifle. I am going to reload, and I would like to know what kind of accuracy I should expect out of this rifle. I have spoken to one owner who did reload. The only information he could/would give is the term 'SURGICAL'. I, unfortunately, was looking more for quantifiable data. (i.e. moa, avg spread at 100 yds, etc...)

Any information that you could give me on this rifle would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you in advance for your time in this manner,

Walt Hucks
Walt Hucks <awhucks@hotmail.com>
Winston-Salem, NC USA - Friday, January 08, 1999 at 12:24:59 (EST) 


JR,
Nice to hear from someone who makes H-S stocks. I have several that are giving me excellent accuracy with the drop-in fit (as it came from the factory). But I have one Remington that just won't shoot worth a crap unless both action screws are torqued way beyond reason - and then it punches single hole five shot groups. The heads on the screws won't take this kind of torque for long before the allen heads strip out.

How would you recommend bedding this one gun (in hopes of getting it t shoot with a reasonable torque setting)?

Thanks for any info.
JPinTX
JPinTX <pruett@inu.net>
Lufkin, TX USA - Friday, January 08, 1999 at 14:23:07 (EST) 


Sarge looks out from his warm hide and fires:

No guys I'm NOT snowed in, haven't even SEEN snow so far! In fact was 71 yesterday and 60 today LOVE this weather! Now if the D**M wind would quit! OK on to other things!
The CNN poll is very enlightening everyone that reads the Duty Roster needs to go "vote"!
JR - I couldn't figure out from your post if you use to work for H-S or still do? Anyway I got off the phone with them about 20 minutes ago with some bad news. They don't make stocks of any kind for Savage rifles! That stinks!
Now for some REALLY ROTTEN news - have been going all over town today looking in my 3 different gunshops (have a real big choice don't I!!) looking for someone to give me a good price on a 700VS. All the stores called different suppliers (one place called 3) and all got the same answer - REMINGTON has DISCONTINUED THE 700VS!!! Now that REALLY STINKS!! Anyone else heard this???
Gee anybody out there with some GOOD news!

Sarge
 

Sarge <garryrn@dfn.com>
Area 51, NM USA - Friday, January 08, 1999 at 16:04:47 (EST) 


Been doing alot of reading about rifle for the last 5 years.
One question I have never seen answered is, When storing your rifle for a period of time, is it best to releave the pressure on the firing pin or will it not hurt it to stay cocked. (bolt action)
David Moody <CntDracula@aol.com>
USA - Friday, January 08, 1999 at 16:29:47 (EST) 
Re: Disabling firearm
Re: Leupold cold soak

Several years ago in Columbus, Ohio there was a shot fired to disable a firearm. If memory serves me, the guy was sitting on the Statehouse or courthouse lawn in a folding chair. The handgun (looked like a snub) was held in front of him dangling between his legs. At the shot (from about 75 yds), the handgun scattered into many pieces and stung the man's hand. In an interview afterwards, either the sniper, or another sniper said that they routinely shoot .308 casings at 100 yds.

The next time that I was at the 100 yard range, I placed three 308 cases on a 100 yd. target frame. I was in the process of perfecting loads in a 6mm Rem 40-X in a Zelenak aluminum stock. Three shots later……. I was able to recover two of the cases neatly perforated. Still have them. It was a bum custom barrel which never shot better than ¾" groups, so it was just a lucky 3-shot group.

Put a Leupold 24X (first generation) in my deep freezer for about 6 hours the other day. The temp was -20° F. ( -28° C). There was quite a bit of stiction (sp?) on the first attempt to move both elevation and windage knobs, and each jumped about a moa or so. However, once broken free, both knobs responded with tactile and audible clicks that were not very different from those in normal temperatures.
Ron N.
 

Ron N. <rcn8@accnorwalk.com>
USA - Friday, January 08, 1999 at 16:57:23 (EST) 


Sarge, check out a Winchester model 70 heavy varmint. It's in the same price range as the remy but has IMO a better stock profile (made by H&S) and equal (perhaps better?) accuracy potential.
Rich <dick2@clarkston.com>
WA USA - Friday, January 08, 1999 at 17:10:33 (EST) 
Howdy fellers.

Sorry I've been so quiet lately. I'm going through a divorce while trying to get moved up to Storm Mountain and my motivation level has been zilch point shit. Add to it that my ex is marrying another person in this field (supposedly a "friend") and its been a real bear. Onward and upward!

I have held off commenting on the shooting guns out of perps hands. Hexa had some very good points. I have found the energy up to partake in this.

First and most obvious question is why would a LE sniper want to shoot a gun out of someones hand? I suppose we could argue back and forth about flacid paralysis not being a sure thing. But you can say the same thing for the fact that the gun might still go off or the sniper might miss (ala hexa's remarks). Bottom line is you still have a maggot hostage taker that will now sue your ass, eat up some correctional facilities budget and probably get out and pull this type of shit again. You have a victim who has to live with the fact that the hostage taker is still out there somewhere maybe seeking revenge or continuing the episode at a later date.

I can group very good on a stationary target, on a firing range when I have control of most everything. But what is the liklihood that I will lose a little group tightener under stress or the gun will move just as I shoot. Pretty good I think.

Men, "In my opinion" don't even entertain this subject if you are a cop. Train for it and leave it in your bag of tricks but don't ever let on to a supervisor that this is an option available to him. Besides, I wonder how many of these incidents were accidental that the sniper involved took credit for as being intentional? Hey it looks good in the press right?

Stick with the high percentage shots. Mark Maguire hit a shit load of homers but how many times did he strike out? Murphy is alive and well. I know. I've met him and his son!

YOu guys that are freezing your scopes...How do they work as ice cubes. That would be cool at a party. Mug of Rum with a M3A sticking out of it. Great conversation starter. Got to watch that eye relief though. You could poke your eye out!

On easing springs with weapons. Always been a habit of mine to drop the hammer when storing a weapon to preserve spring strength. We teach it with Remington based weapons systems. It is also one of the last steps of "inspection arms" in drill and cerimony for this reason. (Had a DI once tell me it was to make sure the weapon wasn't loaded. Jeeeze!)

Whats that? I hear a banjo!! Im a West virginny man!! Yeehaawww.

Guys I love it up there. See, even a old sniper finds a zero every now and then. Ya'll come on up to Storm Mountain ya hear! We'll throw some 'possum on the grill and shoot steel. Got about a 1300 yard shot from the front porch.

See ya,
Gooch
gooch <gooch@stormmountain.com>
USA - Friday, January 08, 1999 at 18:53:49 (EST) 


308 Gunner:

The Remington is a single stage trigger as it comes from the factory. There are two, 2 stage trigger systems out on the market that fit the 700 actions with little work. The first is the Jewell this is a great unit that simulates the action of a 2 stage trigger. They are around $250.00 and have a safety.

The other unit is the Medisha. This is a true 2 stage trigger but has no provision for a safety. A Winchester M-70 style safety can be fitted to the rifle's bolt at around $200.00. The trigger sells for around $350.00. This is a great trigger but the expensive way to go.

A factory Warranty Service station for Remington can adjust the trigger and not void the warranty. This is the least expensive way to go but it will still be a single stage trigger.

As for the AR-15 there is good news. Compass Lake Engineering has a two stage unit they install for $80.00. I would not trying to install any of the other 2 stage trigger units unless you have a good understanding of the workings of the AR-15.

Good luck.

Bruce Buell, NCDS
Senior Instructor, IDRC
Bruce Buell <buellncds@mindspring.com>
Jacksonville, FL USA - Friday, January 08, 1999 at 19:37:08 (EST) 


Hey guys, just wanted to say thanks to all you shooters out there who take the time to answer some of our questions. Alot of time there is no one else qualified to ask, as is my case. My local gunsmith is not quite sure which end the bullet comes out of! Once again thanks, you know who you are, keep up the good work. Some of us really appreciate it.
.308 gunner
somewhere, Ca USA - Friday, January 08, 1999 at 20:55:00 (EST) 
Every day is a holiday, folks!

Glad to hear everyone is concerned with my employment, HA! I've been with H-S for a while now, but I am not a stock builder. Have built stocks in the past but now I spend my days as their barrelmaker, just to make sure they can hold their 1/2 moa guarantee up. And they can and do. Anyone headin' down to SHOT in Atlanta make sure to stop by the H-S booth there, got some new toys comin' out, know you'll like 'em.

I told the old man I was on a sniper site, now he's out looking for a computer. He was an Army sniper back in the late '60's early '70's and would like to check up on today's crop. He did ask me to see if anyone out here knew a Ron Beck, he said last time he had talked to him, he was out in the Middle East in a chopper dumpin Arabs off the oil lines and gettin' paid for it so he was pretty sure he wasn't in the states anymore. Craziest SOB he ever met, he says.

Found a little ballistics site, I think I saw someone talking about it here, JBM, like it.

That's all for now, catch ya later

JR <mrpink@rapidnet.com>
rapid city, sd USA - Friday, January 08, 1999 at 21:36:12 (EST) 


I've been lurking here for some time but I have posted only a few times. Here's another one.

I wanted to announce to all of you here (especially Savage afficianados) that I am teaming up with Savage to provide a special course this Spring just for Savage shooters.

No, I'm still using the Remington action in my custom-built rifles, but I think you'll all agree that there is no finer out-of-the-box rifle than the Savage Tactical. And topped off with a good scope (Leupold, B&L, or even the Burris), it is a tack driver.

Hope to see you all there. Details will be on our website soon. I'm looking forward to meeting all of you, especially Russ Taylor, a favorite of the folks at Savage.

Drop me a line and I'll tell you more.

Bill

Bill Martin <lodmail@lodtraining.com>
USA - Friday, January 08, 1999 at 21:53:29 (EST) 


JR

Thanks for the HS precision stock info, my PSS is about 2 1\2 years old, perhaps youdid make the stock. From what you say, it does sound like a pain in the rear to install one. I could machine the blocks and adjustment mechinism (I am a welder/machinist) and have one of the guys glass it in (I work at an off shore powerboat manufacturer) but it is probaly not worth it. Just hoping to get away from the "duct tape a rag to it" look.

Does the HS police/M24 stock have a high enough cheek rest for anyone?
Mike S <mws@ecom.net>
Southern, California USA - Friday, January 08, 1999 at 22:15:57 (EST) 


Choate Sniper stock, comments anyone? Anyone tried to put a Rem 700 SA detachable mag in one? I think it makes the BDL's into a blind magazine ala an ADL. Colors? I have seen green, and black, but have heard of "camo" color, it is multi colors as if they injected multiple colors when making it? Thanks.
Mike S <mws@ecom.net>
Southern, California USA - Friday, January 08, 1999 at 22:19:17 (EST) 
Mike,

I used A Choate sniper stock this past season in Fullbore "F" Class shooting. This type shooting is done from the ground, off bag and bipod, with scope. Not particularly different from serious work or hunting varmints.

Not much to offer on implanting a removable magazine, but I must say I did like the stock for shooting off the ground with a bipod. Off the bench is a different subject!

The stock that I used was 700 ADL. For a drop-in it was excellent.
Accuracy, as far as I was concerned, was equal to anything that I have. I do recall that I had to make a slight mod. to the accessory hanger in order to fix the particular Harris bipod that I was using and immediately tossed the plastic eared (accessory plate) jamb nut that slipped on the common hex head screw that was issued.

The front end of the sniper stock is not as rigid as I would like for serious work. It seems they left a lot of cooling room in that area at the expense of rigidity. The angle of the butt, from pistol grip to buttplate is roughly on the same plane as the barreled action. This is not good if a quick second shot is necessary, especially off the bench. What I'm saying is that far too much "hunting" is necessary for quick target acquisition. Off hard ground, the threaded elevation pedistal on the bottom of the butt is fine, but in soft ground it would be next to useless. Also, the stock is a bit heavy to use for as a carry rifle.

My stock came with two cheekpieces. One or the other should fill the bill. Also, length of pull and buttplate positing is adjustable to the point that about anyone could fit the stock.

All in all, I was quite pleased for the dollar. If you are considering this stock for varmint hunting, I would offer that Choate has a varmint stock that might be a little more pleasing off the bench. Also, a little more rigid and less angled in the front end. My stock, in the off season, is also used for testing barreled actions. It serves very well for this purpose, and offers a barrel channel large enough for anything I see.

I like it!

Bill Wylde <k9wxr@rr1.net>
FROZEN - SE, IL USA - Saturday, January 09, 1999 at 00:17:46 (EST) 


308 I would not trust the factory trigger on a Remington to be used as a two stage. I'll not second guess your reason for wanting it that way. I will only say that a Remington trigger can be adjusted to give just about any kind of single stage pull you would want. It is a job for one who understands the workings of it however. There are many considerations of safety when you do it. Even a gunsmith, unless he knows Remington triggers can foul up the job. There are 3 adjustments on a factory remington trigger. Not to encourage anyone to attempt this on their own! One is the Sear. One is for Overtravel and the other is the spring tension. Too much let of of the spring and the gun is unsafe. Wrong tension on the SEAR and the gun is Very Unsafe.
Overtravel is also very very critical from a safety stand point as it can bind the Sear and cause a real surprise! IF you have a gunsmith adjust your trigger... When you get it back remove any load and put the barrel on a pad to protect the muzzle from the floor. Safety off. Cock the bolt and close it briskly by slamming the bolt forward (no empty case in the gun either). Don't overdo the slamming as it can damage the bolt face or chamber lock up lugs. But be sure that the firing pin does not fall. IF it does your gun is unsafe. If the pull is properly adjusted you will not feel any travel beyond the moment you actually pull the trigger causeing the pin to fall.
If if fails these testsgs. e it back! The pull should be 2 to 5 lbs depending on what you specify and the particular action you have.
This is a good test on any rifle. Another good test on Savage or Winchester is to put the gun on half Safe position and pull the trigger (no round in it of course) The firing pin should not fall. Then without opening the bolt put it to the fire position. If the firing pins falls you have a death trap! Also be sure that all the screws have been lock tite protected or glued to keep them from moving and then... Never trust the safety on a bolt gun! When not in immediate need of shooting just raise the handle on the bolt! The safety can also be on for a double protection.
B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Saturday, January 09, 1999 at 01:14:59 (EST) 
The M-24 stock is not high enough ine on cheek for many. I tape closed cell foam and canvas on to mine. Have to be careful though, otherwise it obstructs cleaning.
Ed Engler <Ed_Engler@softhome.net>
CP Greaves, ROK - Saturday, January 09, 1999 at 03:51:38 (EST) 
RE: Shooten da gun outa tha han a da bad guy!

Mostly what I want to say (make that scream!!) is...."ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR F--KING MIND???" For reasons that have already been stated chances for an major "F--k Up" are just too great.

Now that I have that out of my system I can think of a few times when a stunt like this might (that's MIGHT) be worth the risk. Recently I have seen several situations when police were confronted with a mentally disturbed or emotionally distraught individual who was a threat to others only in that they had a weapon that in there confused state might discharge and harm someone. I don't think I care if they happen to shoot themselves but as a law enforcement officer I worry about anyone else within range of their weapon. Some of these individules think thay want to commit suiside but want someone else (a cop) to do it for them. I'm not in this buisness to kill people (even if I am prepared to) and all the backlash (personal, profesional and legal) from an action like that could be overwelming.

So...If, under the circumstances described above, a shot could be taken that would have an almost perfect chance of success, where there was no chance of harm to anyone else (IE: where is the shot going after it strikes the gun?) and there is no other reasonable or likely safe solution then I would consider taking that shot....BUT....I still wouldn't like it!

Stay Safe!
 

Depity Dave <dprolls@access.mountain.net>
Finelly Thawing Out in, Snow Crusted West Virginia USA - Saturday, January 09, 1999 at 11:26:16 (EST) 


PeteR:

Just today got the screw up fixed on the home pc. Software was corrupt, Defragged: then compresssed, and then we did stuff to the pc. Har de har har.. Anyway, I was having a bad case of acute "Roster Jones" and was about to start having seizures when the problem got fixed. I got some Hornady 178 and 168gr for the 308, but haven't tested any yet. What's really good is that my order of Berger bullets came this past Wed. ,you know, the one I placed last Sept.

Work has jipped me out of some valuable shooting time. Well, shit happens . When I do tests with the 178, I'll blabber about it. Matter of fact, I've a bunch of testing for 308 I want to do.

Bubba ran of with Barbara and they both joined the Peace corp. May they both rott in Rawanda. Anyway, I just unlimbered back-up Barbara so I'll be okay.

Pat:

Well, N140 justs doesn't quite cut it in 260 with 140gr. Accuracy is good, but not as good as Varget and N160. Plus I think I started seeing some pressure signs at 39.0 gr. Looked like some primer flattening and some cratering. Hey, if got wome data ,please let me know.

Steve (nato): You nailed me...that was just too funny. Good one.

"I can hear the crincle-crackle of carbon buildup
and the hiss of corrosion from the guns in my safe and I have to get up
and clean them before I can go back to sleep. I clean guns that haven't
been shot in months just because I know they haven't been cleaned
either."
 

Jeff A.
I'll be back.
Jeff A. <d1k2l3@aol.com>
Smyrna, Ga USA - Saturday, January 09, 1999 at 11:30:22 (EST) 


Deputy Dave,
If a suicide suspect has a multiple personality disorder, how does one tell if the scenerio is not in fact a hostage situation? Anyone remember the movie Blazing Saddles, and the Black Sheriff?
Steve <nato@bright.net>
S.C.D.H., Ohio USA - Saturday, January 09, 1999 at 12:26:16 (EST) 
Steve...
If a suicide suspect has a multiple personality disorder, Which one do you shoot.
Will the other one sue you, for depriving him of his best friend(or worst enemy)?
... or do you shoot all of them (take an AR just in case) and let God sort 'em out.
Pablito
Paul "Pablito" Coburn <condor@mags.net>
USA - Saturday, January 09, 1999 at 13:08:33 (EST) 
Hey Gooch, is zilch point shit a technical term or is it just New Math? ;-)

On shooting the gun out of the hand. Bad, bad idea. Lawyers begin to salivate. Sets a real bad precedence. About the only case this would make sense is a case of attempted "suicide by cop." If the perp is not threatening anyone but himself, I suppose this could be considered, but the reality is that it only takes a wave of his weapon to be threatening someone else. Real fine line there. No happy answer! Everyone loses. I'd agree that the best advice is to never bring it up as an option!

Split personalities? Easy, aim for the Left brain! ;-)
Scott <xring@voicenet.com>
USA - Saturday, January 09, 1999 at 14:12:49 (EST) 


Gooch, Rod's range probably has your little marine green noggin filled with glee! Bet he hasn't told you that your new job this winter is shoveling him outta the snow - DAILY! I hear 15 FEET is normal up there! I bet he told you that you were going to be a firearms instructor or some such nonsense! Guess he hasn't shown you that high speed Wal-Mart shovel with your NAME engraved on it!
Can you say YO HO HEE HO?!
Renee and I will be thinking of you guys down here in "balmy" PA!

Now, were did I put those sun glasses?
scott <xring...>
USA - Saturday, January 09, 1999 at 14:21:37 (EST) 


Just in case any of you missed it, DP Rolls just release his latest version of the Slope Doper. This one is pretty nice. The mil data is etched on the back now and the plum bob has been replaced with a metal pointer.

Contact Depity Dave for further info and pricing. Buy this thing. Between him, STMC, Wal-Mart and Sheetz Gas stations, they represent the total gross "national" product of West Virginny!
Scott <me again.>
USA - Saturday, January 09, 1999 at 14:25:54 (EST) 


Billy Martin:

Reference your comment, "there is no finer out-of-the-box-rifle than the Savage Tactical".

You've got to be kidding me!

First of all, the trigger is crap. It falls out of adjustment after less than 100 rounds, unless you use ample amounts of 5 minute epoxy on the screws. That usually gives you another 200-400 rounds between trigger adjustments. Thats efficient.

The stock forearm is about as rigid as a piece of Saran Wrap. When you do pull it out of the box, you've got to pull it out of the stock and route the barrel channel out so the barrel doesnt make contact. Even after you clear the barrel channel out, you have to fill the forearm with some type of stiffening compound such as bisonite or devcon to get some forearm rigidity.

And if its such a "fine" rifle, why dont you build your company rifles based on Savage actions?

gunplumr <gunplumr@aol.com>
USA - Saturday, January 09, 1999 at 18:30:29 (EST) 


Sarge peers directly at gunplumr and FIRES:

Hang on here hos'. The Savage may not be the "finest out-of-the-box" tactical rifle Billy says but its no reason to get hostile! And IMHO, I own 4 Savages everything from a .22LR LV, a 110FP in .308 to a 112FV in .22-250 and a 110FM in .308, they are as good OUT OF THE BOX STOCK no work of any kind, as any other manufacturer out there. Yes the trigger needs work - but I've never had ANY of the triggers "fall out of adjustment" on any of my Savages after I don't know how many rounds! And as far as the stock forearm being "rigid as a piece of Saran Wrap" I don't know again I have 4 and NONE of them has any problem with the forearm touching the barrel! In fact all four of these guns shoot better than I can - and I shoot pretty well! I've also had Remingtons, Rugers and Winchesters that I didn't find all that accurate either. In fact had one Remington .30-06 with a wood stock that had to be bedded before I could get it to hold one (1") groups at 100yds. None of my Savages are bedded!
Well here we go Savage bashing again!

Sarge retires!
Sarge <garryrn@dfn.com>
Area 51, NM USA - Saturday, January 09, 1999 at 18:56:34 (EST) 


Oh and I forgot to mention accuracy. Well I could say my 110FP shoots .5 inch groups but that is subjective. Lets just put it this way I can shoot the hell out of soda cans all day long at 200 yds.

Sarge

Sarge <yea...yea>
Area 51, NM USA - Saturday, January 09, 1999 at 19:02:44 (EST) 


Now hold on!!! I have several Savages and I would like to say that since I am the top firearms trainer in this country, that they have been great. All of them shoot 1/2" groups at 200 yards and I would trust them in combat. I have served in three wars and I know what it takes.

If any of you snot nosed kids want to test me, we can have a shoot off where you shoot your chandlers, lous and what ever else and I will shoot my stone stock Savage .243. Any takers?
Chuck Taylor <ct@asi.org>
Ristour, Texas USA - Saturday, January 09, 1999 at 19:14:10 (EST) 


Hi everyone,
chris cooper <ccooper@com1.med.usf.edu>
USA - Saturday, January 09, 1999 at 21:13:23 (EST) 
I just purchased a Rem. 700 VS in .308. I have two questions, what is the best way to break in my barrel and with what ammunition? Second, where can I get a leupold 3.5 x 10 varix III tactical for a decent price. I called a guy up from SGN and he quoted me $425, does this sound right. This is my first precision rifle, I'm more familiar with ARs and AKs. I'd appreciate anyone help on this matter and any other advice you are willing to give. Thanks to all,
chris
chris cooper <ccooper@com1.med.usf.edu>
USA - Saturday, January 09, 1999 at 21:18:34 (EST) 
Oops, sorry for the above screw up/double post, my first time using this board! thanks
chris <ccooper@com1.med.usf.edu>
USA - Saturday, January 09, 1999 at 21:21:44 (EST) 
GEESE,

I get home from work, and all hells broken loose on the duty roster,

Jeff A. surgically removed from the PC without anesthetic, and likeing It! BUBBA AND Bab's in Rwanda, (Marius BE VERY AFRAID!)

Savage owners coming "out of the closet" by the magazineful!

A city of brotherly loves most misbegotten, talking poorly of By-Gawd and the best school on the east coast. Course that why they're yanking IRS from Philly to by-gawd, brotherly love, yeah right

Depity GOES BESERK! news at 11:00

Sarge having a problem procuring a simple old Remington 700 VS while defending the Hide, Missus and Jr. from soda cans. I hear Schumer is trying to pass a law limiting possesion to one six pack a month along with that PA. guncontrol dirthead (uh-X-RING, whats his name?)

Mike M crying in a puddle of blood from hand stitching slings for two weeks straight. :-o

and good old El Alacron throwing in the gauntlet too!

DUUUUUUDDDDDDEEEEESSS! TAKE A CHILL!

things could be worse

I spent my entire day teaching CPR to missionaries going to Haiti!

chao and CHILL!
peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
NOW-BOYS....., bY-gAwD USA - Saturday, January 09, 1999 at 22:03:30 (EST) 


$200. Anyone interested?
Pete Petersen <pete_50@mtco.com>
Chillicothe, ILL USA - Saturday, January 09, 1999 at 22:39:51 (EST) 
Sorry! $200. for Simmon's 800 Rangefinder.
Pete Petersen <pete_50@mtco.com>
Chillicothe, ILL USA - Saturday, January 09, 1999 at 22:45:20 (EST) 
I recently read a post from a thirteen year-old boy who says that he wants to be sniper and one of the replies that he got from B. Rogers was pretty cool, instead of harassing him about not paying attention to the 18 years old thing he encouraged him to stay with his rifle and his dad. I think that you should reconsider being a sniper. Always have somethiing to fall back on. I'm not saying don't become a sniper, just think about the labor that goes into it. I myself am 20 years old and I am in the National Guard. There was a lot of hell to go through. I would like to become a sniper, but I know a hell of a lot about guns and reloading. I know a bit about uncomfortable waiting, if you consider waiting for seven hours in 26 degrees weather for a deer to show himself TRUE waiting. I own a few quality rifles and I also own a .243 Rifle. I "named" is Stainless Painless. Their is an art to shooting and not anyone can do it. Not too long ago I was right where you are. I was 17 and wondering if i should go into the National Guard. I decided to do it and now I am proud of myself and I encourage you to be a sniper, but don't do it so you can kill someone do it so you can save someone. The fact that you watch Sniper over and over is kind of unsettling. Real sniping is nothing like that. I am not a sniper myself but I would like to be. I know that if you get caught then your finger will not be merely twisted off, but your entire head will be twisted off. And sleeping in a nasty swamp won't help you live any longer. I hope that you think about what I have just written.
J.K. Crawford <sniperjk@juno.com>
USA - Sunday, January 10, 1999 at 00:14:24 (EST) 

Chuck:

How long's it been, good buddy? Manila, a bottle of Rum, and some b-girls at the "cabaret", wasn't it? That's about all I can say here, but it was good to get "back in the world" after that tour, man.

I may not agree with you on your choice of "best" trainer, but I do agree with you on the Savage. Shit hot. And if you don't have $3,000 for my rifle, it's the way to go. Even a sub-gun man like you can agree, Chuck.

Bill Martin
President, Line of Departure Training Associates

Bill Martin <lodmail@lodtraining.com>
Houston, USA - Sunday, January 10, 1999 at 00:22:00 (EST) 


Savage a great rifle. Shooting the gun out of a suspects hand. The Choate Stock taken seriously. Please tell me this is a bad dream. I need to wake up.

I leave you Dudes alone for a couple of days and you start dreaming again.

Slope Doper now that is another great idea. Everyone should get one.

We all should go to Storm and get some real training. Until then go to the range and practice, practice, practice.

It's good to hear from Mr.L.O.D. I have heard great things about your rifle but maybe you could explain to the UnDude how you came up with the design of the stock. I am not being a S..A.. I just have used H.S and McMillians for years and wonder why yours is so bulky. It looks very well made.

Back to slings. The UnDude Mike
Mike M. <DMMDNLN@AOL.COM>
Calif. USA - Sunday, January 10, 1999 at 00:59:46 (EST) 


I believe one just flew over the sniper's nest! This place is worse than Washington! Everybody come back when you sober up! Niteall.
B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Sunday, January 10, 1999 at 01:52:50 (EST) 
Mr. Rogers,

Can you say post lunar phase episodes, can ya? ;-)

NOTHING, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING, is worse than Washington, D.C. Cuckoo's nest Ha, we eat them for an appetizer before that "Asphalt aged" grilled posssum Gooch was talking about.

Gee Golly Gosh,

Methinks maybe we need a OEM "Sniper rifle shoot out" to end this mines better than yours issue. What say you gentlemanly types out there?

like uh?

US Domestic Mfg only; Remington 700, Win. 70, "R" whatsit called" and SAV'AGES too.

.308 caliber/.223 caliber only.

cold barrel shots measured from POA to outside edge?

five round groups (c.t.c. or ?) 100, 300, 500, 700 yds?

five-reload-five (timed fire)

long range "best group" five rounds

just a thought, build on it dudes!

Chao for now,

gotta howl at the moon some more AAAAA-OOOOOOHHHHHH!

peteR
peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
BIG-CITY, bY-gAwD USA - Sunday, January 10, 1999 at 09:03:20 (EST) 


Pete,
Sounds like a good Idea to me. I would also like to see a match for the old battle rifles. Springfields, Enfields, Mausers, and Mosin Nagants, maybe an Arisaka or 2. I have access to a 12 firing point 100 and 200 yard covered range, and if I could get enough guys interested, I could make this happen. What do the rest of you think?
Steve <nato@bright.net>
S.C.D.H., Ohio USA - Sunday, January 10, 1999 at 09:24:04 (EST) 
peteR...
HEY DUDE!!! I think you got somfin' here with your last post...
"Sniper rifle shoot out"

US Domestic Mfg only; Remington 700, Win. 70, "R" whatsit called" and SAV'AGES too.

I would add...

A - Factory BBls, factory stocks, after market triggers. You can
re-bed, or glass bed
No sighters or fowlers. You take it outa' the case, you shoot it.
Rifles bbls must be completly wet cleaned "before" each
group or section is fired.
B - .308 caliber/.223 caliber only.

Sniper Match
1 - 1 shot each on five targets at unknown ranges... 400mtrs to
1000mtrs, scored = sum of inchs POA to shot on 5 targets-low wins.
Range w/Mil-dots... (NO laser rangfinders)

Rifle Accuracy Match
2 - TEN round groups (5, clean it, 5) c.t.c. 300, 600, 1000mtrs?
Groups measured widest shots, scores from POA to outside edge?
3 - Five-reload-five @ 600mtrs. Score/time

You guys down on the mountain readin' this... how 'bout an east coast match to give dem bums out west a reason to come East.
(Shooters must bring their own 'possum, range supplies the charcoal)

Pablito
Paul "Pablito" Coburn <condor@mags.net>
USA - Sunday, January 10, 1999 at 10:00:20 (EST) 


( Sniper Country Council Webmaster )
Due to the fact that the content and spirit of this post does not fall within the SMALL number of rules contained at the top of this page it has been removed.

The rules referred to are: "... include insults, or are provocative without reason will be removed"

gunplumr <gunplumr@aol.com>
USA - Sunday, January 10, 1999 at 10:03:36 (EST) 


Billy Boy aka: The Ninja Warrior. Thanks for the back up old buddy. Maybe between you and me, we can teach the kids somthing useful. I herd you had a tif with a guy from Autuagua Arms, Rusty somthing???, You need any help on that one.

I calle Johnny Plaster after I saw you last letter. He will be comming out of retirement at Gunsite and is going to shoot some competitions this year.

Hope to see you at the SHOTSHOW. It is going to be a good one. We can catch up on some black ops stuff.
Chuck Taylor <ct@asi.org>
Ristour, TX USA - Sunday, January 10, 1999 at 10:11:12 (EST) 


I do mostly handgun shooting, but have an interest in, and some gear for, long-range precision shooting.
Joseph P. Martino <jpmartino@compuserve.com>
Sidney, OH USA - Sunday, January 10, 1999 at 10:33:37 (EST) 
I saw a comment in another post about Norinco 45's. The commentor apparently had no personal experience with one, but said he'd heard they were pretty good. I have one, and I'm satisfied with it. It's held up well through several thousand rounds, it shoots well, and is probably the equal of a GI model. It's not as nice as my Kimber, but for the price it dosn't have to be.
Joseph P. Martino <jpmartino@compuserve.com>
Sidney, OH USA - Sunday, January 10, 1999 at 10:37:28 (EST) 
The thought of a postal match is a good one.

I don't have a problem with .308 to 700 yards, but everyone knows the poor little .223 won't make it that far.

My old ham radio buddy Bill R. could handle the stats. Sounds like he stays home on Saturday night. Is S.W. Kansas as boring as S.E. IL
on Saturday night, Bill?
Bill Wylde <k9wxr@rr1.net>
Frozen - SE, IL USA - Sunday, January 10, 1999 at 10:46:37 (EST) 


Gee golly gosh wow, just getting all excited about the possiblity that the Rookie may get to compete with all you long range gurus. Hope I'm the last in line to shot so I can learn a whole bunch of stuff. Since North Carolina is in the middle of the East Coast, let's make it here. Best Bar-b-que in the south. I'll even build a custom fishing rod as a (second hobby prize).
Guess I'll have to move up the training schedule. Gillie monster suit design now looking like a small forrest. Think I'll cut down a laurel thicket and glue it on too. Thought about attaching a small wading pool with cattails and yucky shit floating on it to slide through the swamps.
Bolt out

Bolt <mbolt34547@aol.com>
USA - Sunday, January 10, 1999 at 10:50:22 (EST) 



"Thanks to the office of Rep. Edward Royce (R-Ca.), for making available the
following excerpt from a local radio interview. A female newscaster is
interviewing the leader of a Youth Club:

****************************************************

Female Interviewer: " So, Mr. Jones, what are you going to do with these
children on this adventure holiday?"

Mr. Jones: " We're going to teach them climbing, canoeing, archery, and
shooting."

Female Interviewer: "Shooting! That's a bit irresponsible, isn't it?"

Mr. Jones: "I don't see why, they'll be properly supervised on the range."

Female Interviewer: "Don't you admit that this is a terribly dangerous
activity to be teaching children?"

Mr. Jones: "I don't see how, we will be teaching them proper range discipline
before they even touch a firearm."

Female Interviewer: "But you're equipping them to become violent killers."

Mr. Jones: "Well, you're equipped to be a prostitute but you're not one, are
you?"

Torsten <lasercon@dialup.globe.de>
G3ermany - Sunday, January 10, 1999 at 12:00:46 (EST) 


Guys this year is starting bad. We just had two Oakland Officers shot. One didn't make it. I can't go into details but it looks like the 60's all over again. Well back to patrol and hopes of finding the suspects. Mike
Mike M. <DMMDNLN@AOL.COM>
Calif USA - Sunday, January 10, 1999 at 12:11:01 (EST) 
pete R. :
Excellent idea to have that rifle match but why limit it to only U.S. manufacture? I think it would be nice to compare the whole spectrum of rifles, U.S., foriegn, inexpensive and top of the line. The goal of this match should be the knowlege gained by comparing rifles.

Torsten:
That was a great story about the female interviewer, I already told a few people and they loved it. I don't know where you find these stories but I look forward to them. Thanks.

gunplumr: Settle down guy, this is supposed to be fun.

Mike M:
The same thing happened in Chicago yesterday Mike. Two cops, partners, were shot. One was wounded the other died. What the hell is going on out there? I'll bet my life savings that they'll find out the two murderers are out on bail or released early from prison. The politicians will never ask "Why were these guys free to commit more crimes?" but they will call for more gun control.
Kodiak <rvl@inil.com>
USA - Sunday, January 10, 1999 at 13:25:26 (EST) 


Sorry to hear that you lost one, Mike M.

Things are still at a slow pace here in all the ice and snow.
Too old, fat, and lazy to go ice fishing or Coyote hunting, so
still cruising and musing.

This may be old hat to some of you, but in scrolling through old posts to this list, I came across an interesting topic....first shots in a clean barrel, with moly-coated bullets.

My first serious attempt to use moly was in 1997. Just prior to heading for the Canadian Nationals, I spent an afternoon playing with bullets dry coated with moly, and bullets that were greased with moly enhanced grease. A very interesting test at 200 yards with chronograph running.

With a clean and dry barrel the velocities climbed slowly for 5-7 shots with dry moly. Reversing the operation to clean bullets after moly didn't indicate any appreciable difference in velocities. With pre-greasing the bore lightly, with moly enhanced grease, the velocities were right there from the git-go.

I confirmed this to my satisfaction this past Labor Day at Cedar Springs, Ont. We were shooting at 900M in individual competition and switched to a team match for the final shoot of the day. I made the switch to moly-coated bullets from shooting clean ones. Elevations were horrible for at least the first five rounds!

Since that first bench test I've kept all my barrels greased and waiting. Not only for that first good shot, but to also preserve
the several CM barrels that require ongoing protection.

I would sure be interested in hearing from others that have done such playing.

The moly-enhanced grease refered to is nothing other than readily available moly-grease that has been mixed with powdered moly to the point that it is quite dry, but still may be applied to a patch.

Bill Wylde <k9wxr@rr1.net>
FROZEN - SE, IL USA - Sunday, January 10, 1999 at 13:40:28 (EST) 


Easy Gunplumber - Lets not get personal here. We all have our pet rifles and the proof is in the puddin. I'm a big fan of Remingtons but lets all face it, a big factor for which is the best rifle is the one that a shooter has confidence in. I like the idea of a stock rifle shoot off. How about we'll find a weekend with some time and we'll do it at Storm Mountain. Maybe we'll have a side match as part of this years Gy Hathcock shoot. We'll drag them through a stalk area, dunk 'em in a creek, give the operator 1 minute to dry the chamber/bore and shoot a 10 shot group at 100 yards. Hows that sound?

Sorry to hear about the shootings out there Mike. Maybe you'll get a chance to shoot the gun out of the bad guys hands! Yeah right. Hold tight and don't anticipate!

Any of you guys into Rock und Roll need to check out the Ted Nugent "Spirit of the Wild" CD. A couple of titles are "I shoot back", "Kiss my Ass", "Fred Bear", etc. Its a real mellow album to listen to while you read the News Paper these days.

Take it easy guys. Relax, breath in annnd ouuuut. There we go. chill out.
gooch <gooch@stormmountain.com>
Elk Garden, WV USA - Sunday, January 10, 1999 at 13:41:44 (EST) 


Been out of circulation a bit, but things have finally mellowed out and I've had a chance to work with my new Remington 700 Police.

There is one glaring problem with it -- it has the worst magazine setup I have ever used. I'm not talking about the rather strange release system with a latch on either side, but the way it jams so easy when inserting a magazine. If not slowly inserted level with the well, it will lock into place with the magazine angled down in the front about 5 degrees. A rap on the bottom does not seat it fully, and if I try to chamber a round that way the point jams into the front of the well. I feel this is absolutely unsatisfactory for a tactical weapon.

Is there a better magazine system I could switch to, keeping the stock? Or should I just treat it as a BDL that doesn't dump the ammo all over when I unload it?

>All of them shoot 1/2" groups at 200 yards
sounds like something from rec.guns, not SC

Jim <hampshire@mediacen.navy.mil>
Ft. Meade, MD USA - Sunday, January 10, 1999 at 13:59:33 (EST) 


TORSTEN, STOP IT NOW! you're killing me man, I'm gonna break a rib from laughing so hard!

Mike M.
Sorry at Oaklands loss, send'em dirtbags our way when you're done with them and we'll treat them reel goood........................

Guys, i meant .308 vs. .308/ .223 vs. .223 not apples n oranges crap, THE REAL DEAL, PUT UP OR GET OUTTA HERE, REPLETE WITH ROBINS EGG BLUE PUMPS IF YA GOT'EM!

DUDES KEEP POSTING IDEAS, ITS GETTING BETTER WITH THE GREAT INPUT!

CHAO!

PETEr
peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
BIG-CITY, BY-GAWD USA - Sunday, January 10, 1999 at 14:14:48 (EST) 


Jim - Look under articles and comentary. There is a ditty from Andy Webber on magazines for bolt guns. You might find what you are looking for there.

Not to bust on you Jim. Like it says at the top of the duty roster, look into the "Cold shots and hot tips" and the articles/commentary section before you ask a semi-standard question like this. The guys and I dont mind answering questions but after the 4th or 5th time on the same question I tend to blow them off. Sorry, but when we type up a 5 paragraph answer to a question it gets old trying to find it in the word processor or retype it. Thats why Marius and Scott and others are busting their butts to come up with these archive sites. Im sure the site managers have other things to do like change diapers.

gooch <gooch@stormmountain.com>
USA - Sunday, January 10, 1999 at 15:02:47 (EST) 


Does anyone know where I could get information on unertl Scopes? Manufacturer address?

Thanks
Ken Miller <kmiller2872@aol.com>
USA - Sunday, January 10, 1999 at 17:47:40 (EST) 


Ken...

John Unertl Optical Co.
308 Clay Ave.
Mars, PA 16046-0818

1-412-625-3810

After a large fire, and off the market for a while, they have a full line of scopes, but they won't sell you the military 10x.
Paul "Pablito" Coburn <condor@mags.net>
USA - Sunday, January 10, 1999 at 18:40:28 (EST) 


Well guys the day is over. Not any fun. Two PD Shot one killed, Three Firefighter with a building on them. One won't make it. Shit Heads maybe incustody before day is out for the shooting.

Gooch, E-mail me with your new address and an EMail that works. I have a new sling for you. I wont to ship several on Monday.

To all thanks for the support. Guy that got it was on the Street for 11 weeks only had kids. All you Military Guys know how this feels but we keep getting shot by the people we are supposed to protect. A brief version is these two guys were just recovering a weapon thrown out a vehicle during a pursuit and were apparently ambushed.\

Now if I could be given the chance to MilDot Master the suspects and check for group size the day would be better.
Mike M. <DMMDNLN@AOL.COM>
Calif USA - Sunday, January 10, 1999 at 19:14:56 (EST) 


KODIAK,

My intent was to start small, minimize variables by using domestic produced, and then we could go from there......
Nothing meant against foreign and "best quality" rigs, just grassroots funshoots for all to learn skills from the Zen masters of the UKD zone.

Please guys, lets keep this one rolling and maybe we can turn it into something local, then regional, tomorrow ze vorld! I forsee about 50-100 rounds max. to give everyone a challenge,but get a bunch of folks through an event and happy.

Steve(Nato), A most excellent idea, especially after the Fred Fisher shoot-em up at Storm Mountain with the single shot rifle! Bring on the Dinosaurs, they can shoot in the right hands!

Dudes,

Together we can make it happen!
peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
BIG-CITY, bY-gAWD USA - Sunday, January 10, 1999 at 20:01:41 (EST) 


Hey so far your site has been everything I have hoped for. I am looking into start shooting at long range. Some of my friends have turned me towards the Remington 700 VS and PSS. But none of them have ever shot them. Nobody that we know has one for us to try to see if we like it. If anyone can help me out in this quest just E-mail me so we can talk about these systems. Thanks
Edward <Hawaiihawk@aol.com>
Flagstaff, AZ USA - Sunday, January 10, 1999 at 20:41:28 (EST) 
Swanbon: Hexa is completely correct in his evaluation of what may happen when you go for the weapon hand of the criminal. You are not that good, I am not even close to being that good. Ohly the Lone Ranger is good enough to do that, and I don't wee anyone wearing a mask around here. Right Kee-Mo-Sabee.

Gentlemen, Gentlemen Have we leave of our senses or is it a full moon out tonite. I don't think so! So we all must be Frickin' crazy.

peteR: AwRight! Moly coated undies. I love it! But does that mean they won't stick to the ceiling after a victory throw in the bedroom. Oh well!! And just think, my frilly undies won't have those unsightly skid marks on them any more. I can probably get another three or four more weeks out of them without changing.

Sarge: You Nasty man. Telling us about the balmy 70 degrees in Roswell, NM Talk about slapping our rosy red cheeks of the boys up north. You should be ashamed - or an alien!!

308. The facfory Remington trigger can be adjusted , but very carefully to a crispy and snappy 3 1/2 pounds. Any lighter you are starting to talk about a trigger such as a Timney, Canjar, or a pricey little number called a Jewell trigger. Follow the instructions to the letter of B. Rogers. The explanation is excellent simply excellent.

Jeff: Bubba of the Smyrna Swamp and Barbara the Nailer. Oh bummer for the people of Rwanda. But it leaves you free to pursue Fluffy the Floozy. Just take her out of the closet, inflate, rub a little Rem Oil in the appropriate location and you are GTG. I'm also waiting for several boxes of 178 grainer Hornady (in your case (Horny - Day) bullets. I will be loading them up and when the weather breaks a little up here I will be down at the range. Alright so I'm a Pansy. But a warm one sitting with my criminally beautiful wife in front of a romantic fire. AaaaHhhhh!

Chuck Taylor: So are you related to Russ Taylor? How do you feel about Rugers in general? I applaude you for being the three different wars - must have been the Civil War, Indian Wars and the Spanish-American War. I was only in one "conflict." - without our "El Presidente."

Sarge (again) Savage bashing: New triggers can be installed on the 110 and 112 Series Savages. That will make you group size get even better. As far as practicality goes, the ugly knob at the end of the barrel is the most logical and stress free way of attaching a barrel to a receiver. I'll still take my Sako action - Douglas barreled - McMillan stocked paper punch.

Lets try to remember folks that we are highly in-telly-gent gents and a have a great deal of ed-ju-ma-ka-shun (Gooch thats West Virginny talk for smarts). Like my poor ol' grandma used to say (God rest her soul) Opinions are like asshole - everybody has one. Lets try and respect each others assholes.

Gooch: How about a good e-mail address so I can relay some things about the OGCA show in March. Lot of good news bout that - if you are still interested with Rod.

Talk to me fellas

al

Al Ostapowicz <aaostapowicz@worldnet.att.net>
Taking a Chill Pill here in the Sunny Chill of Northern , O-Hi-Er USA - Sunday, January 10, 1999 at 21:06:40 (EST) 


gunplumr: Drive on dude. There have been some who want you to take the idea that "this is supposed to be fun" mentallity. Sorry tolks, this is not fun. This is business and it should be considered serious. I have never seen a Country field a Savage Sniper System. The reason is this: IT SUCKS.
Not Tellin <Cant Say>
USA - Sunday, January 10, 1999 at 22:20:45 (EST) 
Bill W. It's like living on the edge of Bagdad out here on Saturday night. 1000 yards. How much drift is that in a 55 mph wind?
Yep it's the moon awright! I thought it was the booze but naw it's the moon! MY gosh hurry up with that postal match the postage stamps go up to 33 cents monday. That's about what my reloads cost.
Gooch: if you do all that to my guns they'll disolve!
All: as far as a shoot off for factory guns. It's all in the barrel you get and the bedding/free floating you do and then the other 70% is in who what/what you shoot in it and how hard the wind blows. That's why they have shoots so often. It would be fun though! I guess a large sampling would be worth looking at.
I don't know ... you remember that scene from the Good, Bad, and the Ugly where they all three come together? I can see Gooch and Chuck and the Plumber......in that order.
Torsten you are corrupt!
 

B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Sunday, January 10, 1999 at 22:46:04 (EST) 


Okay, I thought my address was up but I was wrong. Use this until the web master can get his head out. Use ryan@stormmountain.com. I'll get it.

Gooch
gooch <ryan@stormmountain.com>
USA - Sunday, January 10, 1999 at 22:53:38 (EST) 


I need an adress of a dealer that can repair my J.Unertl rifle scope.
It is the "Vulture" model 10x43. Any help is greatly appreciated.
The cross hairs have fell inside from excessive shooting and recoil.
Sincerely,
Pappy
Pappy <Pappy7070>
Bunnlevel, NC USA - Monday, January 11, 1999 at 00:47:00 (EST) 
Postal Match!!

I know that the M24 is not OEM but our monthly range days are next week and if the format is set by then, my boys and I would like to play.
One limitation: Max range for us is 735m.
Ammo would be M852.

This sounds like a hoot. I think we would get thumped, but some of us need a lesson in what real shooting is, NOT just knocking over a E-type on a pop up mechanisim.
 
 
 

Ed Engler <Ed_Engler@softhome.net>
CP Grevious, Salivating Korea - Monday, January 11, 1999 at 02:21:28 (EST) 


Like I said, monthly range days. So if not now, then later.
Ed <Ed_Engler@softhome.net>
USA - Monday, January 11, 1999 at 02:24:46 (EST) 
I went back over the hot tips/cold shots archive on cleaning and I saw no reference to CLP. It seems to be used on everything from M1 gun tubes to handguns in the Army. I've used it for years on my pistols but never much on my rifles, is it any good for fouling or just for powder residue and carbon?

Gooch: I feel your pain buddy, my 1st wife left me for my shooting buddy as well. The divorce cost me most of my guns, I think that hurt worse in the long run than her leaving.
 

Deputy Dave: My heart goes out to guys,and I'm afraid it's going to get a whole lot worse as we get closer to Y2K.

A bad day shooting beats a good day working!

John
JohnS <jrscar@codenet.net>
BroncoMania, Colorado USA - Monday, January 11, 1999 at 03:36:05 (EST) 


How are you shooting under stress?

My shooting is terrible at the moment:-) I tried a real biathlon-track for the first time this weekend. Skis, Anschutz .22 straightpull, etc. The track was 7.5km with 5 shots prone at 2.5km and 5 shots standing at 5km. I got 2 out of 5 prone and 2 out of 5 standing... Runningtime is classified + 6 minutes penalty. Junior shooters, girls and boys, used me as a pylonmarker out on the track. Very sobering.

Torsten: You've got to try this...( don't bet with anyone!)
 

TorF
Oslo, Norway - Monday, January 11, 1999 at 04:18:00 (EST) 


Pappy... Your e-mail address is a bomb also... and the address for Unertl was posted 7 notes before your question...
Do you read this page???

John Unertl Optical Co.
308 Clay Ave.
Mars, PA 16046-0818

1-412-625-3810
Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Monday, January 11, 1999 at 05:31:56 (EST) 


Hi there

Both my fiance and myself are trained snipers and I just want to thank you for a very informative page and keep up the professional work !!!!
 
 

Kobus Du Toit <kobus@ats.sani.org>
Pretoria, Gauteng South Africa - Monday, January 11, 1999 at 06:39:10 (EST) 


TorF,

I know what you mean, I have not tried it on ski´s, but I have signed up for our Reserve State Championship team and trained with them.
Summerbiathalon is the killer, no downhill coasting.
We shoot with a G-3 with a Platic training bolt to fire 7,62 Platic Training Ammo at 25 Meters, at a Bullseye Target.

I just scrubbed my being Instructor in a April Sniper Class, if I want to go to SMTC in the Summer I will have to hold back on my Reserve days.

Russ Taylor, if you still check in here E mail me, I lost your home mail adress !

Now who is all going to be in Atlanta for the SHOT SHOW ?
 
 

"Ende"
Torsten <lasercon@dialup.globe.de>
G3ermany - Monday, January 11, 1999 at 07:49:34 (EST) 


Guys,Guys,
Whats all this bickering about?? MISTA GOOCH or Rick said it all a while back, "ITS THE MAN BEHIND THE GUN THAT MAKES IT SHOOT"!! There are both good and bad in all brands, but like many of you, I find it hard to believe that out of the box guns are shooting one half inch at 200yds consistantly. We all get that occasional group that we like to brag about but that doesn't make it a quarter minute rifle because we got lucky once. When you shoot 5 or 6 5shot groups at a 200yds and the average is .5 then you have a rifle that shoots .5 at 200yds in my way of thinking. Just my opinion,for what its worth. By the way did I say I thought Savage sucked!! Just kidding Russ, I know your out there keeping tabs on us and that was for you!!!
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Monday, January 11, 1999 at 09:18:45 (EST) 
Brothers "T" in euro-pee,

neat posting on biathalon shooting, while sipping my morning expresso latte' and scrolling the newspaper I darn near choked on my biscotti.

see http://www.adn.com/
page 1 USMC troops doing Biathalon outside of Anchorage, AK.

My high school Alma Matter town, sigh, brought back memories of setting spring snares and Malaysian death traps (sans spikes)for the high school X-country ski team. Now it wasn't done for malice they weren't elitist or anything like that, we just wanted to give them "an edge" when they competed.

sNnot Tellin 
gee-gosh So of us are just civilians DUDE! Not all readers are military or law enforcement officers. I agree with the serious business, if you have to drop a hammer/striker/firing pin/Piezo electric ignitor switch on a hostile target.

REALITY CHECK, What percentage of the civilian population will do this terrible, terrible act? (Thats your local prosecutor-plaintiff lawyer after you've made the shot, had the internal investigation, the pre-requisite civil rights violation lawsuit and once again sit in court)

How about it members of the military and L-E community? anybody been there done it?

Most of us calm-tranquil-good natured folks just want to learn as much as we can and improve our shooting skills.

as is fast becoming the catch phrase in by-gawd, Chill Dude!

Chao!
peteR <PNGREIFF @AOL.COM>
WARM INSIDE TODAY, bY-gAwD USA - Monday, January 11, 1999 at 09:32:45 (EST) 


On this Brand Shooting thing. Why not everyone who has a out of box Rem,Savage,Browning,Ruger whatever go out and shoot three 500 yard 3 shot groups all within 5 minutes, at 3 different 6" round bullseyes on white background. NO cleaning involved but groups numbered 1-3 number 1 being a clean barrel. Document the Rifle,the caliber, the load,& note wind direction and temperature. Send them to a designated judge to evaluate. Also would be nice to note status or interest/experience of the shooter. No personalities would enter the picture. Only a sincere interest to provide a sampling would be neccessary or welcome?
IF the purpose is to evaluate this might be a good experiment and everyone could probably participate at 500 yards and that's far enough to see variations in speed. Everyone Wins!

Sarge; It's one thing to shoot a good group and another to hit a soda can at 200 meters! One is bench groupin and the other is good shootin.

Pat;I've got 3 out of the box remingtons that are guaranteed not to shoot 1/2" every time. As I've said in the Archives. If your gun shoots 1" one time and 3" the next you have a 3" gun not a 2" er.
If it shoots under 1" 99 percent of the time it's close to a 1" gun.
That included the first shot out of the cold barrel by the way!

That Skiing business reminds me a combination shoot I had once where any rifle,pistol,mg,or combination thereoff could be used. I'll spare you details of the course but you had to move very quickly for about 150 yards and end the match by double tapping a cardboard stationary sillouete at 75 yards and then hit a time stop plate at 15 yards (both from a barrel lying on it's side on the ground). 20 guys shot with all kinds different guns and when it was over there were 4 holes patched in the sillouete and 1/3 were disqualified because they couldn't hit the 6" stop plate before they ran out of time. You laugh!But...
 
 
 

B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Monday, January 11, 1999 at 10:39:12 (EST) 


Not Tellin:
Only a few of the people who read this roster are military or police snipers. Most are just interested in this subject and want to improve their shooting skills.
You mentioned that no country has ever adopted a Savage system. Does this mean that every rifle never used by a military is crap?
Lastly, it should not be a problem to disagree with someone without getting nasty and slinging insults.
Kodiak <rvl@inil.com>
USA - Monday, January 11, 1999 at 10:57:28 (EST) 
PeteR,
Concerning your first round zero question, here's what happened. Used Black Hills Match,(52gr)it was quite windy, not enough rounds to be statistically significant, only one load, etc., but here you go. Savage Tact. clean/cold barrel, 1.6" above point of aim (POA),.8" left, group size, .75; Fouled/cold barrel 1.7" above POA, .75" left, size .58"; 5 shot group from fouled barrel 1.9 above POA, .6L, size .58" . It was so windy the ducks and geese were grounded and I should have waited for a better day. However, I was sure you were anxiously awaiting this data, as inconclusive as it may be. The PSS performed in a similar manner, two groups at .57 and one cold/fouled group at .65. Group placement was quite consistant.

Barry

Barry Chance <Barry_Chance@maxtor.com >
Longmont, Co USA - Monday, January 11, 1999 at 11:10:09 (EST) 


Thanks Barry! You da Man! Next time if the geese are grounded, stay home and warm!
peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
STILL WARM AT HOME, bY-gAwD USA - Monday, January 11, 1999 at 12:17:19 (EST) 
I see everyone was in high spirits over the weekend. Keep it cool guys, but tell it like it is. Nuff said.

On the age old Savage issue. I'll reiterate some comment's from months ago. The Tactical is a fairly capable rifle, given it's limitations. A new stock is certainly in order. I do not care who says otherwise. That factory stock, while serviceable in the most basic manner, is not up to speed for real tactical environments. NOR was not meant to be! The pillars helped to be sure. But it is by no means hard-use capable. Further, the rifle may shoot well with the stock at the rifle range or on limited field outings - target plinking and prairie doggin'. But the barreled action is capable of better and static bench shooting is not the same as shooting in the field from oddball positions. Most rifles in the right hands can shoot well off the bench. Given true field conditions, with stresses applied to the fore end, goo in the works and ugly condition abounding, bad things can happen. Even to QUALITY after market stocks, which the factory 110FP stock is not. God forbid you used a tight sling hold if that is your particular preference. You will pull the fore end all over the place. A beefier stock can only improve things.

Savage uses the stock it does to provide you with an affordable decently accurate rifle. Where they to install a stiffer higher quality unit, the retail price would be raised accordingly and this would put them in line with some of the higher dollar factory rifles - which would move them out of the market they currently have - a lucrative market they enjoy. Some conjecture: Savage smartly considers their reputation, deserved or otherwise. They see that a $600 dollar 110FP with a top notch stock can not compete with an equally priced brand X due to Perception. They then choose to keep the status quo and sell gobs of rifles with the stock they currently have. Why? Because for the current price, it sells. Ron Coburn is a good businessman. He ain't stupid. I think of the 110FP in these terms: a good barreled action waiting for the right stock. If you buy one, just consider that factory stock a gimme. It came free with the action. Replace it when you can afford to, or shoot it as is if all you do is plink.

I can not speak about the Savage trigger issue as I have not played with it enough, but there will be good after market units soon. For a guy stuck on a limited budget, you can not beat the 110FP, or 10FP. They shoot well and are upgradeable. Would it be my fist choice if I had unlimited funds? No. Not today at my age and income level, but if I were 22 and fresh out of school, looking for an accurate rig to play with, certainly. But until I beg borrow or steal a Savage and live with it in a field environment for weeks, I can not discount it wholesale. If some of you have done so, and I mean REALLY used the thing in the field (be it in training or police work), please comment here on you experiences. I do not care about this range-shot group or that one. I do not care if you think it is the cats me-effing-yow. I want details on real field use, in weather, mud, rain, and crud. Dragging it around. Dinging steel (or gray matter) from 75 to 1000 yards. Ideal range conditions do not apply on Sniper Country. If the 110FP has held up well under those conditions, in completely stock form, we need to hear it. My guess is that it could not due in part to the stock. But I would be happy to be proved wrong! I have no beef with the big S as a company and believe they fill a niche. And more power to Coborn. He has really brought that company around.

To give credit where it is due: I have fired a friends 7mm Magnum with an after market stock that would hold an HONEST .7 moa group in all conditions tested. No BS once in a life time group. I fired smaller groups with this rifle, in the .4 to .5 range, but the group average was .7moa. No bullshit benchrest 200 yard groups. Just honest performance.

I have repeatedly heard other posters on this site say that they have Savages (and other brands!) that will shoot ½ moa or less at 200 yards and beyond. Sure, we have all done that. But every day, day in and day out? In REAL conditions? I seriously question the validity of such a statement. Especially when worded to appear as though every one of this or that persons personal rifles will do this, or that this or that brand will do this. Those kind of statements bother me because when coming from someone who sounds like he knows his stuff, or is known to be an authority, novices will run out and buy something based on that opinion. They in turn are greatly disappointed when reality hits. Worse, they may come to believe that their skill can never be good enough because they can never match this mythical goal. And there is the rub. Wild claims can be made. They can help improve ones standing or reputation. They can certainly sell a product. But the real loser is the reader or prospective buyer who may not know any better. In the end, making claims of this nature is a disservice to the people one intends to help or inform. It can be interpreted as a way of keeping oneself ahead of the pack if you get my drift.

To sum it all up: There ain't no magic bullet. Rifles are only as good as the shooters behind them. Hype is meaningless in the field. Buyer beware. You get what you pay for. Don't believe everything you read. And finally, the meaning of the universe is 42…42 what? I just don't know.

Now play nice. But tell it straight.

Scott <xring@voicenet.com>
USA - Monday, January 11, 1999 at 13:28:39 (EST) 


Scott,

Well said Sir!
Doc <docs@fidnet.com>
The "Balmy" Ozark boonies, MO USA - Monday, January 11, 1999 at 14:00:18 (EST) 


Has Remington completely commited to the 700 P DM action in .308? I ask this as I am just too lazy to call them up and ask. I would dearly like to see the 700 P continue with the standard BDL internal box magazine, at least as an option. I guess I am one of them thar (west virginy speak) old fashioned types who doesn't much see the need for a detachable mag on a bolt gun designed for precision long range shooting. Everyone has tried it since the Germans began the trend in WWI with limited or questionable success. So help out an old myopic late 30 something weezer. Call Remington and say: Bring back the .308 caliber PSS with the BDL box!
Scott <xring@voicenet.com>
USA - Monday, January 11, 1999 at 14:14:47 (EST)

peteR: Dinosaur???????
Fred
People's Rep. of, MD USA - Monday, January 11, 1999 at 15:32:46 (EST) 
Dear all,

Unfortunately, due to too many reasons, I do not have the time lately to read the Duty Roster - but it will be chaning in the very near future. As such I do not perform my duties to the fullest of my abilities, for which I have to apologise. I just surgically removed some posts ( partially ) from the Roster, most noticeably that from "gunplumr" dated Janaury 10, after receiving an email advising me of the offensive nature of this specific post.

The Duty Roster IS a place for FUN, and SHARING OF INFORMATION, NOT, and I repeat NOT, for PERSONAL ATTACKS on other people, be they visitors to Sniper Country or not. If you disagree with a poster on some/all of his/her comments, and feel that a personal attack is in order, by all means do so, BUT NOT ON THIS ROSTER, or anywhere on this site. Address a personal email to the party/parties involved, and vent as much as you like, if you really have to do so.

Even better. Write such an email, venting all you want - and then send it to an invalid address with an invalid return address. You will have vented your anger or whatever without incurring the wrath of somebody else, most probably unnessarily in any case, and you will not receive a return.

I hope I will not have to address this issue again.

All the best, and keep them straight on target.

Marius

PS Big Sniper: Kid, I suggest you read the intro to this site, and also your email.
Marius Ferreira <mferreira@lantic.co.za>
USA - Monday, January 11, 1999 at 15:45:40 (EST) 


Daaaammmmn Scott,
Yo yo yo. You go boy! uh huhhhh sheeeit.

I got this Marlin see. Its a 30-30 and I can get 1/2 inch groups at 50 yards. Does anyone make a taper'd scope mount for a 30mm tube for it. I'm think'n bout a Schmidt-Bender for it. Can you pillar bed lever action. Does LOD make a stock for it?

Bob Dweeble
Lil Rock Arkansas

I'm almost out of here fellers!

Gooch
gooch <ryan@stormmountain.com>
USA - Monday, January 11, 1999 at 15:46:48 (EST) 


I just sent an email to "Big Sniper", and then thought I'd betterpost the mail here, so other kids of like mind can also benefit from it.

Marius

===========

Son,

I only saw your post on the Sniper Country Duty Roster just now. I do not live in the United States, but the site does reside there. And, as far as I can understand, the sort of information on this site is not supposed to be for people of your age. If you showed sense I most probably would not even have bothered mailing you, but I am afraid you didn't show such in your post to the Duty Roster.

Watching the movie "Sniper" so often? Not that I believe 9 million times a day, more like once a week maybe. Even then - WHY? Do you know what it is to kill? Not to kill like a normal soldier in war would - firing at the enemy and hoping to kill some, but searching out ONE SPECIFIC TARGET, and WATCHING THAT PERSON DIE?!? I doubt it!! It is not good, not good at all. IT IS UGLY, VERY UGLY, and you have to live with yourself for the rest of your life with that thought, seeing that face. Did he/she have a spouse? Children? Was there some loved one somewhere? Now waiting for him/her never to return?

I suggest you go away from Sniper Country, and only return when you have come to your senses, but only after you've read the following article on the site:
An SC Article

Seriously, you need to get your priorities right, or you're going to cause your parents great grief.

Sincerely

Marius

===============
Marius Ferreira <mferreira@lantic.co.za>
RSA - Monday, January 11, 1999 at 16:09:32 (EST) 


Bill Wylde,

I have some .308 BR brass which has had the primer pockets "uniformed" with the Whitetail tool. Occasionally I'm getting missfires, and even a second strike won't set it off. Dismantling the cartridge shows an unfired primer.

It always seemed to me the tool removes too much material. I usually set firing pin protrusion to about .052 to .055" in the Rem bolt rifles. Is this enough? What are your thoughts on the matter? Do you use the same depth for both small and large primers?

I know that I'm not going to use it anymore if my protrusion depth is in the normal range.
Ron N.

Ron N. <rcn8@accnorwalk.com>
USA - Monday, January 11, 1999 at 20:18:52 (EST) 


Mike in Berkeley, I'm the guy that swapped scopes with you a while back. I hope you're as happy as I am with the swap. Thanks again for your patience. I'm sorry to here of your dept's loss. Best of luck on that matter.
To that youngster that wants to be a sniper at 13. Perhaps your father has an opinion on that. I can't beleive how smart my old man got once I was old enough to realize it. If you don't think taking another person's life has some ramifications, if you have no problem with this, talk to someone about it. Your father, mother, an uncle...
Best of luck, and whatever you do, be the best at it.
Hey, didn't Tom Berenger's character say " The only one that counts is the first one." ? Be sure you know what he meant.
Jim Liles <youngestliles@hotmail.com>
PDX, OR USA - Monday, January 11, 1999 at 20:32:35 (EST) 
Witch weapon is the best of remington 700 308,or a scerria 300m
richard brewer <kbrewer@janrix.com>
fayettiville, nc USA - Monday, January 11, 1999 at 20:45:38 (EST) 
Ron N.
Are the missfired primers flush with the back of the case head, or recessed 10-20 thou..., and are the primer indents on the missfires normal, or shallow compared to the good rounds that fired?

If the primers are recessed more than about 5 thou, and the primer indents are shallow, the pockets are too deep!
If the primers are flush, and the indents are shallow, the cases have the sholders back too far... too much head space on the cases, not the rifle! Put two or three layers of scotch tape on the case head and close the bolt, you should feel more resitance if the cases are ok for headspace.
Also check the primers... I have about a dozen "fired" missfired primers on a shelf that had no pellets in them.

Pablito
Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Monday, January 11, 1999 at 20:51:27 (EST) 


fIRST THEIR WAS x-RING, tHEN sPIDER-bAIT, THEN tURKEY mOLESTER, NOW LETS SEE............ ONE PAGE POST OF I LOVE SAV'AGES hhhmmmmmmm
Gooch /Kudu ANY IDEAS???????????????????????????????????????????

Fred, Old Dino Dudester, they can shoot, I know, I watch Quigley down under 30 times a day......... ;-)

Gooch,
Its Yo! Yo! Go Boy! to Marius, sleep deprivation finally made him crack. I agree Marius, but is it spankings, or the more politically correct "time out"? Go-Go-Go-Boy!

Pat (mrbullet) and Bill R.
Right Said Guys!

Ed Engler, maybe we can cobble something together for ya soon.

Scott, FYI; the Local Sheetz is now selling Partagas cigars at the counter so the By-Gawd economy must be getting better. :-o

Chao!

peteR
peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
FUNCITY -HEE-HEE, bY-gAwD USA - Monday, January 11, 1999 at 21:15:38 (EST) 


Marius; Well said - on both topics. First about taking things too seriously and especially about the 13 year old. Your parental "reptilian" scales are starting to show through. We you have daughters, the scales become armor tough, but can be melted in the wink of a teary eye of your daughter. Believe me.

Maybe I'm being a little nit-picky, but if you are going to post something and you feel some people may not agree with you - have enough "balls" to write something down other than "i'm not gonna tell you." or some even more inane. Stand up for your convictions whether they are right or wrong. Damn boy, its not like we are going to come over and burn your garage down. I just don't have the time or the inclination.

This post does offer me a great deal of escape from the pressures of every day life. My wife understands this and leaves me alone (most of the time) when I am reading the Duty Roster. Some times she even has some feminine input, rather than just seeing eveything from a man's perspective. Being able to converse on an intelligent level with people who have the same interest as my self - this is a great site.

I'm outta here. Philosophized enuff tonite again!

al
Al Ostapowicz <aaostapowicz@worldnet.att.net>
Sometimes not serious enough in the Grand Dictatorial State of , Ohio USA - Monday, January 11, 1999 at 21:21:12 (EST) 


Torf: Read your post about the biathlon shooting and it brought back some memories. Back in the 70s when I was with the 10th SFG, my team went to Elverum, Norway for a couple of months of winter warfare training. Did a lot of cold weather shooting, demolitions, ski and dog sled training (-20 C) and a couple of 60k biathlons. They were kickers. I believe we were issued 7.62 FN-FALs back then which shoot extremely well in the cold. Can't say as much for me. I remember I missed a couple at 200m for a time penalty. I think we were shooting at about 40k into the race. Between the stress, cold and adrenalin pumping a mile a minute you really had to concentrate on each shot, no matter how rushed you were. I'm sure Norway is as picturesque and lively as it was years ago. Regaurds...
Tony Y.
Iselin, NJ USA - Monday, January 11, 1999 at 22:03:30 (EST) 
Does anyone know why Remington discontinued the 700 VS? I called Remington today to confirm. I tried to get one through my dealer and the distributor told him he was out and never getting anymore. Does this make sense to anyone? I asked the spokesperson if it was being discontinued for another model, and she said yes, some kind of composite barrel and stock. The new price tag was $1600!!!!! So, I guess I"m SOL for that model. I'd appreciate anyones suggestions.
Thanks,
Chris Cooper
chris cooper <ccooper@com1.med.usf.edu>
FL USA - Monday, January 11, 1999 at 22:15:54 (EST) 
To Anyone who can help:
Im looking for a new prone mat, its called a "Unimat" ! Can anyone
give me manufacturer, phone, some kind of contact? Thanks, clh
Carl L. Hall <clh@koyote.com>
USA - Monday, January 11, 1999 at 22:43:15 (EST) 
WARS?
My dad was in 5 wars. The WWII, the Korean and the Cold, The Vietnam and something about a bar in Athens. We would have to do some digging to talk to him about it though! Don't lecture me cause he would find that quite amusing! He retired after the bar incident with reduced pay.
He always said he was in it for the free airplane rides. He was OK but he liked M-1s. Never could get him out of that one! Sorry but the 13 year old (sniper) got me thinkin about him in the night!

B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Monday, January 11, 1999 at 23:00:27 (EST) 


Pablito,
This particular primer is recessed .008" and the indent is shallow. It just happens occasionally and so I'm probably on the borderline of ignition. But still want to know what is acceptable for protrusion. It could be that the protrusion is too shallow and this case is acceptable; don't know for certain. I know someone else who had misfires at a 600 yd match after he "uniformed" the pockets with the Whitetail tool.

The chamber is a .308 Obermeyer, GO plus .001". Cases are resized to the minimum amount needed for chambering.
Ron N.
Ron N. <rcn8@accnorwalk.com>
USA - Monday, January 11, 1999 at 23:11:28 (EST) 


To the Big Sniper:

Listen to the people who are or were snipers, not who acted as one , played make believe on some movie. Sure it seems real and fantastic, but being a sniper is 99.9% mental, and the movies don't show that. They show spectacular shots and kills, and man wouldn't it be cool to do that. But the movies don't show the aftermath, not of the victim or his family, but of the soldier himself. Twenty years after his tour in Vietnam, I was 14 years old, was the first time my father spoke to me of what had happened over there. He slept about 2-3 hours a night if he was lucky, and even then it was like he had never left the war, and that is because the war never leaves you, you never forget. There is NO way to prepare for that experience that no one would wish upon anyone else. The movies will never tell the story that a true sniper can, they will never see it thru their eyes, and never believe that they will.
 

For the rest of ya:

Talked to the old man the other day, just got his deer processed, he says those four legged bastards just aren't sporting enough, he'd rather get himself one of those 10 point non typicals, ten toes up, I think he said we should import some of those dinks, they are much more enjoyable to watch explode in the scope.

Every day's a holiday, folks

JR <mrpink@rapidnet.com>
rapid city, sd USA - Monday, January 11, 1999 at 23:11:51 (EST) 


TO: DINKS

SORRY IF I OFFENDED ANY DINKS BY USING THE WORD DINK
JR <mrpink@rapidnet.com>
rapid city, sd USA - Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 00:00:56 (EST) 


Gentlemen:

Can't you tell when you've been had? And by whom? Who's real here and who's not? And what's with the needless and arbitrary editing of posts?

Few "out-of-the-box" guns, short of the Accurary Internation AW series of rifles, are going to be up to the job of military or LE sniping. The Savage Tactical line is a marketing tool to sell you rifles, no different than the 700 PSS, now DM, line. And cheap glass with pot metal rings will fail you when you need them most.

Out here.

P.S. Those who know me, you'll see me in Atlanta, if not sooner. TTFNMFs.
A Voice from the Past <Alas@anon.com>
Not here, Anymore USA - Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 01:12:28 (EST) 


Hey everbody,

I'm new to this duty roster thingy so bear with me. What's nagging at me is this business about Big Sniper. I have to agree on the age thing. But please, all i ask is that you cut the kid some slack. Everybody's got to have a dream. About the movie: i think you should've busted on the writer/director or whatever of the movie before busting on the Big Sniper. I mean, the kid can't help it that some bozo totally screws up the whole subject of sniping. That's what you guys and his dad are here for. To help him through all that. To set him straight. (When he turns 18 of course). Yeah, i know it's a young age to be considering stuff like that. But kids literally absorb stuff. Now would be the perfect chance to keep him in line about what it's all really about. If he changes his mind, fine. More power to him. If he doesn't, then maybe you guys can help make him a fine fellow marksman.

Other than that, i really admire the communication you guys have here. It's like one big happy family. Kinda makes ya feel a warm and fuzzy inside.

later
Jumoli <jumoli@hotmail.com>
USA - Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 01:48:18 (EST) 


Australia puts women in front line

by Paul Ham
Sydney

THEIR muscles may be smaller, their lung power may be
less. But women can be every bit as ruthless as men,
according to the top brass of Australia's armed forces. Last
week they announced plans to let women join combat units.

If senior officers get their way, women will soon be slashing
paths through the jungle and learning to bayonet the enemy.
They will even be considered for entry into the special forces
if they can run two miles in 16 minutes in full combat uniform
while carrying a rifle and a 66lb backpack.

Admiral Chris Barrie, chief of the Australian Defence Force,
put forward his proposals after a review of the role of women
in the military. In response, the government is expected to
overhaul employment laws that bar women from joining
combat units in the army, navy and air force.

Military commanders say they must appeal to women if they
are to arrest a decline in the number of recruits, which has
fallen by 20% in 10 years. While the initiative has been
welcomed by female recruits, the prospect of training women
for hand-to-hand combat has put some men up in arms.

"It's a load of rubbish," said a major in the army's training
division who served in Vietnam. "I have a daughter and I
wouldn't like to see her in the front line.

"The nature of the male beast is that he can drop the shutters
and kill. Can a woman do that?"

The answer is yes, according to Karlene Oliver, 17, a lock
forward in her high school rugby team - "It was great fun
smashing up other girls without getting into trouble" - who
enlisted in the army last week.

"I don't doubt that women can do what men can do," she said
as she headed off for a six-week basic training course in
Wagga Wagga, New South Wales. "I don't think women are
the weaker sex psychologically."

Oliver joined another new recuit, Alexi Dranna, 18, from
Brisbane, Queensland, who aims to enter a combat unit. "If I
pass all the physical tests, why not join the frontline troops?"
she said.

Should she succeed, Dranna will become one of the few
combat-ready women soldiers in the world.

Canada, which allowed women into combat units in 1987, is
believed to be the only western country that recruits them
specifically for the front line. Fewer than 100 have trained as
battle soldiers, serving in peace-keeping roles in Bosnia,
Congo and Rwanda.

In Australia, the most controversial aspect of the military's
plans is the possibility that women will join the Special Air
Service Regiment (SASR), the nation's most elite combat
unit. No other country has entertained the notion of women
serving in crack squads of this calibre.

The SASR, which fought behind enemy lines in Vietnam, is
regarded as one of the world's toughest military outfits,
renowned for the intensity of its training in the deserts of
Western Australia.

If Dranna attempted to join the SASR, she would be
expected, on day one, to run 1 1/2 miles in 9 minutes 30
seconds and to do 60 press-ups and 100 sit-ups.

The rest of the course includes running and walking for up to
60 miles across desert dunes, arduous underwater diving
exercises and a series of free-fall parachute jumps. Recruits
learn how to "engage the enemy" and destroy them using
bullets, bayonets, knives and bare hands.

One woman has already proved she is up to the physical
standard required. Major Robyn Fellowes recently
completed the cadre commando course, an endurance test in
the outback that is said to be as tough as the SASR's.
Fellowes enlisted for the intelligence service but still had to
undergo commando training. "Many men couldn't have done
it," said a senior officer.

Although many in the military establishment have no objection
to women in combat units, some remain hostile, particularly
older soldiers. Michael O'Connor, executive director of the
Australian Defence Association, a military think tank, warned
against the proposal.

"I don't like it one bit, frankly. The liberal elites, the feminists,
are driving this. They're trying to change the role of women,"
said O'Connor, who saw combat as a military policeman in
Papua New Guinea in the 1950s.

"Fighting in wars is not a role for women."

Some military women in Australia have nevertheless shown
themselves undaunted by physical obstacles. Last year
Natalee McDougall, 22, became the country's first female
helicopter pilot.

"I don't think the process of getting women into combat units
is gender-related," said Admiral Barrie. "What we have got to
focus on is: are the individuals capable of doing the job?"
 

......................................................................
 

So now the question : What do you think of women as snipers ? The Russian had them in WW II.
Are there real limitations to a female sniper team ?
I dont think CoEd would work, but belive that a Woman could in some situations actually be the better Sniper.

"Ende"
Torsten <lasercon@dialup.globe.de>
G3ermany - Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 03:21:15 (EST) 


Torsten,
I agree with you about women snipers. From my limited experience, I find that girls are much easier to train than men in the art of shooting. Men grow up thinking they already know everything there is to know about shooting, and develop many bad habits. Women, on the other hand, go in knowing that they need to learn, and have no bad habits to unlearn. It really is a shame that more women dont enjoy the shooting sports, In some ways they are naturally built for it. For example, in offhand rifle, a lower center of gravity is an asset.
Steve <nato@bright.net>
S.C.D.H., Ohio USA - Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 07:07:29 (EST) 
To Tony Y., re. Biathlon.

So you've been to "Shooting and Winterwarfare Trainingcentre" at Elverum. I've been there several times. It's a cold place...

You were shooting Norwegian produced H&K G3's.

To Torsten:

I think ski-biathlon is more difficult. You are wearing out your arms with the ski-poles on the track. They have no "juice" left for the shootingrange.

BTW. Ski-biathlon is the most entertaining shootingevent. Especially the 4X7,5km relay. You americans should go to Salt Lake City Olympics in 2002 and watch it live.
 

TorF
Oslo, Norway - Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 07:33:56 (EST) 


Nato Steve,

jep your right about that, exept the low center of gravity. I showed our club presidents 18 year old daughter the correct offhand position with a Feinwerkbau Air Rifle, you know hip froward, supporting arms elbow on the hip, etc. When I looked down to see if she was placing the elbow correctly I saw that her hips ended about three inches above my bellybutton, and I´m 6´2´´ ! What a set of legs !!! and she was´nt wearing Gooches pumps ether !

TorF

point taken on the long arms thing, exept that we run with the rifles in hand, but thats still not working them in Skiing fashion.

I went to our Winter Warfare training in Mittenwald, I hate Mountains, you know, thin wind and such!

Norway would be nice though, now if I could just get the wife to come along !
Torsten <lasercon@dialup.globe.de>
scrounging G3 parts for the guy´s, in G3ermany - Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 09:11:59 (EST) 


I just read an article that scares the hell out of me. It has to do with rifle teams and school shooting competitions. The article stated that Kenneth Trump of the National School Safety and Security Services in Clevland felt that from a security stand point your tremendiously increasing the risk of something happening in the school by having these weapons on campus. They went on to say that last year in Dorseyville Middleschool near Pitts. PA. canceled its rifle program because a parent complained. School offficials said the program was inconsistant with the districts "Antigun Policy". With whats happening now with law suits against the gun manuf. I think were in for some drastic changes in our gun laws and freedoms. This could be the beginning of the end because people really are convinced that the gun is the problem with society. Its just one more case of "Its not my fault" and looking for someone else to blame.
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 09:23:48 (EST) 
Women snipers and in combat in general -

Sure why not. Makes the hide a lot cozier. If it gets real cold the sharing of body heat thing would be great. And we'll just time our offensive action to when they go on the rag every month. And all of the rapes and sexual harrasment charges that will be floating around will improve the good order and discipline in the grunt units. Also the lowering of standards which will no doubt happen can make it easier for all men and women to get in elite units so that our armed forces are a reflection of the sheep that we protect.

I trained women recruits in small arms at Parris Island for almost 3 years. Sure they were easier to teach, if you didnt accidently touch one wrong or have one fall in love with her coach. Even had one have an orgasm one time while a coach chewed her ass out on the firing line! They cried when it got cold and wet, they could barely handle the rifle cause of its length, had a hard time grasping an M9 pistol because of its grip size and some couldn't press the double action trigger with one trigger finger. Half of them couldn't see out of a fighting hole and had to have help gettin out of said fighting hole.

Almost every female DI I talked to said that women should not go to combat.

Why do women want this? They dont!! THE POLITICIANS DO!!!! Its all a continuation of the Pat Schroeder agenda now being carried on by Barbera Boxer and Diane Feinstein. Its the old equal rights thing. I dont want men to go to combat much less women. WHy do they treat the duty of going to war and killing and being killed like a civil right comparable to equal pay and pregnancy leave?

War is a terrible thing. No one should have to go. Leave the women out. Sure the Russians had women snipers. THey also had 10 and 12 year old boys too. Thier country was being over ran and everything had to be thrown at the Nazis. If we ever get down to the same point the Russians and Germans got to in WWII or get in a situation like the Isrealis(?) we would have to do the same thing.

In case you didnt know the Canadian Armed Forces are a bigger experimentation ground for social change than even the US military under Clinton. THey are even giving sex change operations to soldiers!! No lie guys.

Why should we want to do as some of these other countries. We are the USA. Last time I checked we were the leaders not the followers.

Gooch
gooch <ryan@stormmountain.com>
USA - Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 09:26:17 (EST) 


Ron N.,

It is doubtful that the uniforming tool is the culprit. It could be off dimension, but doubtful.

You state that you "set" firing pin protrusion. Are you by any chance playing with a homegrown titanium FP? I know these can be a nightmare.

Regardless of the problem, the .055 setting should get the job done, but I'm probably a poor one to ask. The only ignition problems I've experienced were with fast actions and "issue" ammunition with hard primers.

It was mentioned in another post that the cases might be a bit short.
This could be the problem or it could be that something is slowing the striker. You could also have some bad primers, but this doesn't happen often either.

Have you made any modifications to the Remington bolt? If so, you might try reversing these mods.
 
 

Bill Wylde <k9wxr@rr1.net>
THAWING - SE, IL USA - Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 09:41:17 (EST) 


http://www.securityarms.com/gallery.htm

check this out, all sorts of nice pictures !

"Ende"
Torsten <ya know>
- Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 09:43:50 (EST) 


Gooch...
Fine post... like it is, without the PC crap...
No wonder we get shooters get flak...
...we don't buy the PC "Party" line!
Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 09:47:43 (EST) 
Does anybody have a source, either new or surplus, of binoculars with Good Mil reticles...
Need 'um soon to go with laser rangefinder.
Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 09:51:18 (EST) 
As usual I'm FUBAR! You guys have finally convinced me that I need a 700 VS in .308 and sure enough, Remington has discontinued them. Just got off the phone after talking with my salesman at Simmons Gun Specialties and they do have the 700 VLS in .308. How does it compare to the VS other than being around $50 cheaper?
Doc <docs@fidnet.com>
The Ozark boonies, MO USA - Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 10:36:39 (EST) 
This is a great website. I came here to learn more about the art of sniping. It helped me learn quite a bit about sniping. It also encouraged me to further pursue more information about being a sniper at a higher level.
Anthony M. Bellen <catsftbl19@aol.com>
Seymour, CT USA - Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 10:38:08 (EST) 
Doc,
The VLS and the VS are basically the same except for the stock and the finish. The VS has the matte finish and the VLS has a gloss finish. I hate to see Remington stop making the VS it's a great rifle for the price.

Marius,
I understand where your comming from on posts getting to personal but then we are all "BIG BOYS" and we should be up for a little flak if were cought with our pants down on a particular issue. I agree this is not a place for "Personal" attacks but if the person is wrong then what is wrong with calling them on it?? Someone may profess to be a so called expert and if someone else knows their not then maybe it should be brought to light. Just my opinion and as AL says....
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 12:36:48 (EST) 


Hey all you Remington 700VS shoppers!

Just a dumb hill billy, but have you tried your local Wal-marts? I was standing around while wifey shopped, and asked the clerk at my local WM sporting goods dept. about Remington 700's and she whipped out a 3" thick catalog, said what do you need, and that they could cut a chunk off the list prices too.
So Don't drop to your hands and knees just yet guys, make some local phone calls there has to be some in the pipeline.

Oh-yes they have Shoe-goo, tripods, cheap spray paints in our favorite decorator colors, and canvas, jute, burlap, and camoflage pattern fabrics in the fabric dept. for you ground crawling Picasso's.
You could call it our own little "EVERYTHING store"............
Chao!

peteR

peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
BIG CITY, bY-gAwD USA - Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 12:44:41 (EST) 


PeteR, the funny thing is, I LOVE Sheetz! Always stop and get gas there. Best price in town.

JR. Great post. You are going to be very welcome here.

To all. I was not going to comment on this, but feel compelled to now. I do not agree totally with the unilateral removal of posts on this roster. I tried to make that clear recently in a short note to Marius. But it was after the fact. The posts were removed by then. He did what he did because of the header at the top of this Roster. Right or wrong, it is done. It was done for good reasons from his perspective. I do not totally agree, but I can not fault him for trying to keep the place civil. My view of the rules of engagement is that you avoid foul abusive language while still getting your point across in an intelligent manner. If you can do that, we'll are all grown up here and can take it, or should be able to.
I see it this way: while we need to remain civil on the Roster to avoid having it degenerate into a real cluster F*** of abuse, we also should not feel like we have to pull punches when they are due. If a product sucks, or some one has slung a truck load about something, by all means, I feel it only responsible to allow rebuttles. This does not mean violent hate mail. But if a guy says his rifle can hit a fly's eye at 1000 meters or that he is the greatest shot in the world or that this or that product will give 100% effectiveness every time, well, you just can't let that go! Why? Because some people will surely believe it!

So I'll reiterate. Play nice. BUT tell it like it is.

As far as "A voice from the Past" goes, he is entitled to his opinion. He seems to forget that half the people reading this site are civis or POLICE who do not need, can not justify, or simply can not get their department to pay for a $3000 rifle. But then, his kind of arrogence has caused us grief enough here. So "Voice", do we just ignore a complete line of firearms that LE has to use to satisfy your belief in generally unobtainable rifles?
Go back to your hole boy, if you do not like what ou see here, don't come back. Go play big shot at the show. And while you are there, tell all those cops you meet that their PSS/P DM/VS/110FP/what ever is a piece of crap. I am sure they'll just be so happy to hear it. I am also sure they will love to hear that you are going to foot the bill for their new high dollar rig.
Scott <xring@voicenet.com>
USA - Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 12:48:19 (EST) 


To all:

I remember a time when there was talk about Snipers, SWS´s, Naugas, Shotguns, Savages, and even R....´s on this site and we all seemed to have a ball and still get the point across in a professional manner.

I wonder if that will come back before everyone goes out to look for it elsewere ?
Torsten <lasercon@dialup.globe.de>
- Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 13:32:42 (EST) 


Sorry about that guys. Torsten is right of course. I must have finally caught what ever was going around last weekend!
Scott <xring@voicenet.com>
USA - Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 13:45:50 (EST) 
The nice lady at Remingtom said today...

The Remington 700/PSS (hinged floorplate) is still available in .223 with 9" twist...

In .308, only the 700/P-DM is now available.
Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 14:08:50 (EST) 


Bill Martin uses the Sako actions, not Remington.

Chuck Taylor's website and e-mail addresses are wrong.
 

-
, - Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 14:59:54 (EST) 


OK, now that PSS and scope are on the way (finally), gotta get the backup-backpack-spotter-get the hell out of town gun matter settled. Would it be preferable to have a .223(can carry more ammo) or a 308(would be same caliber as primary gun)? Would collapsable stock be preferable? 16" Barrel?
Opinions on AR10A4 for this purpose? Can't afford Hand K.

Bolt <mbolt34547@aol.com>
USA - Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 15:06:59 (EST) 


Most sensitive dudes. I agree with Torsten. We've all gotten on our hind legs once in a while on here, but lets not slide back in to the days of Russ Taylors rampages about "hoisting" and personal attacks about double postings and shit.

Some of the people who care the most about the "skill to kill" are the ones who get riled the most on here. Im sure "gunplumber" (or whatever)has reasons for what he said. Sure he was pretty blunt about some stuff but...

I had left this site for a while because of the way some people were being treated. I started hanging out again because things had cooled down. Lets not go back that way.

On the other hand how are we supposed to address stuff like bogus instructors in the community, or rip off products? THats what this site is about right? Lets say a certain person is selling a rifle stock as a "drop in" stock when it is not. I come on here and call a spade a spade. Is that an attack? No, its the truth. If a certain person does me or others wrong in this community should I stay quiet about it or let everyone else know so you guys can avoid this person too?

A perfect example is a certain member of the community who purports to have been a "black ops" operative. I have talked to a former employee of this persons and numerous SF/SOCOM fellers who say they never heard of operations involving the guy. He claims to be working for the State dept yet they deny that he works for them. Maybe he is a double-naught spy! Who knows?

Well lets just all relax and put the kevlar back on and prepare to defend our positions. After all we are wearing big boy pants, most of us. I havent seen any one blast anyones personal issues on here, only shooting related material. Lets keep it that way and let shit fly!

Gooch
gooch <ryan@stormmountain.com>
USA - Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 15:17:17 (EST) 


Torsten,
Did Santa bring you your range finders?? If so have you tried them?? I found out mine are worthless in cold weather. They wont pick up a suburban at 50yds!! If you got a pair and have played with them let me know how yours are doing.

Has anyone seen or shot the new Tactical Remington with the 20" barrel?? Who is making the stock on them?? Is it still and H&S?? They look like a neat little rifle, should be the answer for the Law Enforcemant boys.
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 15:21:48 (EST) 


Mista Gooch,
AMEN, we are all big boys and if were wrong we need to be called on it. I like this sight because I think most of the guys on here are straight shooters and tell it like it is. It may not be PC but its the truth and thats hard to beat. When I ask a question or someone else does you get a good cross section of answers and though we may not all agree, we all agree that this is a sight with a lot of great guys on it with a wealth of knowledge that they are willing to share with others. I for one look forward to it on a daily basis when possible, and if someone is blowing smoke or trying to con us then he should be called on it. Then if they don't like it, the proof is in the doing.
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 15:50:16 (EST) 
If anyone knows whether or not Parker Hale has a web page or of some distributor that carries their bipods, please email me with the information! Thanks in advance! wfb@cisunix.unh.edu
Bill <wfb@cisunix.unh.edu>
durham, nh USA - Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 15:50:47 (EST) 
Just a quick note before I log off for the night. I haven't read all of the Roster, just scanned through to see that I've stirred a hornets' nest last night.

Right or wrong, I stand by the removal/edit of the posts, irrespective of what the cadaver has to say. To me it can best be said in the words of someone else, namely the majordomo of a listserver I belong to:

"To be unsubscribed from xxx, send email to xxx, or breach the canons of civility that govern our interchange in this group."

I agree, we will disagree on a lot of things, but we should do so in a civil manner. I think Taylor has a lot of gall, to say the least, to come on here and call himself the best trainer in the country. Take him on, but don't take him down - and that applies to anybody. Let's just enjoy the ride.

Now it is time for bed.

Marius
Marius Ferreira <mferreira@lantic.co.za>
Pretoria, RSA - Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 16:41:26 (EST) 


Good day gents;
Thank you for selflessly giving of your time to construct a page a great as this. There are not many pages out there that are done to keep the spirit of the hunt alive to pass on to future generations. Again, I commend you on your excellent work.

Semper Lethalis
SPYDER1 <SPYDER1@mailexcite.com>
Augusta, GA USA - Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 16:44:55 (EST) 


Gooch,

I'm in full agreement with your last post. Everyone is an adult here, or should be, and generally it shows. I've been visiting here for the past few months, and while I have little to contribute, what has kept me here has been both the knowledge of the group, and mostly its maturity. If a question is made, usually several well-thought out responses are forthcoming. Not everyone agrees, but each individuals point is generally made intelligently. Truthfully, if people are looking for either personal attacks or lots of bad information, all they have to do is hang-out at rec.guns for a while. You really have to hunt thru the garbage there to find a gem. Not so here, and I'm sure that's why many stay here.

By the way, for those who remember my last post, my wife has decided to put up with the smell of Hoppes as a nice gesture on her part. I owe her, of course :)
Dan A. <damish@velocity.net>
Erie, PA USA - Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 16:51:24 (EST) 


Parker-Hale Bipods...
Bill...
Brownells' carries P-H bipos.
Their number is 1-515-623-5401
P-H bipods run from $315 to $395
 

Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 16:53:17 (EST) 


Thanks for all the responses about the bedding the 1st inch or 2 of the underside of a rifle barrel. Very helpful. Also, it's good to hear that everyone thinks so highly of marine-tex. I'll definately be bedding my rifle with it. Good night to all.
PatD <pdesarno@yahoo.com>
Fairfax, VA USA - Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 18:36:45 (EST) 
Gooch buddy you have me almost in tears today. How could I agree with you more. First I'll say women in combat are about as good as female Cops in a knock down drag out fight. You have to read between the lines since the chief can censor what I say.

Fake trainers are abundant and ripping off many folks every where. An example is a former FBI Guy that claims to have been there and done everything. He even teaches Oil Rig Take Downs. His place of instruction is in a nearby valley. Well last year the department sent me to his M16 Instructor class. It took about five minutes to know he was a fake in the sense that he didn't know the weapon period. He is just a teaching whore. That was one long school.

Crappy gear is another thing. I have seen more junk pushed on PD's then you could imagine. Recently they came up with "The Wrap" Long story short if you get six cops you can tie someone up in this thing. No kidding but six of use usually can take care of anyone so whats the point. This thing is bigger than my combined SWAT and Riot Gear bags. All the PD's bought it and no one uses it.

Well you got me started now. The UnDude Mike
Mike M. <DMMDNLN@AOL.COM>
Calif. USA - Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 20:03:39 (EST) 


Some observations, BEST of.....whomever...There's always a faster gun!
We've taken up a lot of bytes trying to decide what this site is all about! We could clear the archives of that and double our memory left.
I have begun to believe male harmones have killed more snipers than about anything else.
A big high priced gun and scope doesn't a shooter/sniper make!
Anyone can be a sniper.....the meaning of the word depends on what value you put on it!
Gettin shot at or paid don't make you a good shot or an expert either!
Some guns might be better than others but nobody knows if there's one that always was/is!
Hunters ain't neccessarily be snipers but snipers better be hunters!
Sniping is a serious business but it is best pursued with a little humor lest it becomes a real dangerous bore!
SAVAGE is the stuff arguments are made of!
All good riflemen better be brothers or there won't be many riflemen afore long.
 

B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 21:15:14 (EST) 


What is the "Legal" minimum size Nauga ?? Will a Ruger .308 with a Douglas barrel and 165 Sierra BTHP be enough of a rifle to take the critters ??
Did anyone EVER answer that guy about CLP and if its any good?? Good for nothing, is my opinion....its suppose to be a bore cleaner, lubricant and preservative all rolled into one !! HOW?? I have never seen any used on the ranges I haunt except somebody with a NORINCO who doesn't know better and bought the darn 7.62x39 from a "Army/Navy store". Yep, had to have it while in the service but I also had my stash of REAL bore cleaner. The stuff that was issued had to be "Shakened OR Stirred" before use. Think I have a quart or two still put away to be given to other shooters when we are getting ready for a match. Give them that "extra edge"!!

BTW, I understand that Ruger has an "LE version" varmint rifle. Anyone know anything about it ?? And FWIW...Ala State Troopers have Steyr .308's for the TAC units !!! Maybe it has to do with the importer being here in the state ??
Comments ??
OUT HERE
Will <willadams@mindspring.com>
Sweet Home, Alabama USA - Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 21:41:36 (EST) 


Sarge is observing (read he's working to much and sleeping to little) and will FIRE when he gets the proper shot!

Sarge
Sarge <garryrn@dfn.com>
Area 51, NM USA - Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 22:34:05 (EST) 


Pat:

Have one of those Rem. Lightweights at the shop right now. 20" barrel, three wide flutes, stock is H-S, like the PSS stock but forend is a bit shorter and narrower, and no palm swells, nice and light, I think around 7-8 pounds. No subsitute for a heavy barreled guns, but if you want a lightweight, quick handeling, easy to hump for miles, it looks pretty good. It is for sale, see www.awesomearms.com for info.
Mike S <mws@ecom.net>
So., Ca USA - Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 22:49:24 (EST) 


I am a retired US Army Abn Ranger that was a shooter in Vietnam and just happened to find your page be accident. My rifle was an XM-21 and loved it better than the Winchester I first had. I have an M1A and would like to find the tech specs of the XM-21 and attempt to duplicate the rifle. If anyone out there has any information I would like to obtain it. Thanks
Marc A. VanDerKarr <nutbin@bayou.com>
Calhoun, LA USA - Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 23:53:04 (EST) 
Pat; Do we have to show our "Wheaties" badges to buy that new tactical or is it for sale to any Cheerios eater? Remington has a habit you know and seems to be getting more selective about who they sell their so called "tactical" stuff too.
B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Tuesday, January 12, 1999 at 23:55:26 (EST) 
I am looking for information on using a .30-06 for sniping. I know the most popular rounds are the .308, .300 WIN Mag, and .50 BMG, but why isn't there much mentioned on the .30-06? It has ballistics similar to the .300 WIN Mag, with less recoil. Please send your responses and give me any info you have. I currently have an old M1903-A3 fitted with a synthetic stock and a 4-12X50 with BDC. The rifle is a tack driver.
James R <JRRSLLR@AOL.COM>
FL USA - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 00:00:24 (EST) 
Will, Re: CLP

It is all I have ever used to lube my AR-15 and I have not experienced any problems. As to bore cleaning with it...Don't know, never tried that.

Gooch,

Don't hold back, what do you really think about women in combat?

IMHO, there are some things in life (combat, fire fighting, subdoing thugs, etc) that women should just not be a part of (.) They get in the way trying to do somthing that they can't physically do and they put others at risk when they need help. My wife and I lock horns on this issue on ocasion but over the years she has come to understand that I can't abide guys that are talkers but not doers either!

I don't care which but you need to: Lead, Follow, or Get Out of My Way!

Stay Safe!
 

Depity Dave <dprolls@access.mountain.net>
Thawing out at last in, Magnificent, West Virginia USA - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 01:54:27 (EST) 


Muzzlewrap `?

what do you guy´s use to keep snow, rain, crud, out of your rifle barrel ?

I know, first of all dont let the stuff get in there in the first place, carry the weapon muzzle down in the rain etc. but what do you use to cover it ?

Condom ? Tape ? just any plastic foil ?

and has anyone tested if it changes the cold barrel zero ???

The stuff should be blown away before the bullet gets there, but does it work ?

I use latex anti HIV Gloves, cut off the fingers and .... five muzzledoms !

Of course mine is bigger then yours because I have this here muzzlebrake on it.

"Ende"
Torsten <lasercon@dialup.globe.de>
G3ermany - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 03:12:35 (EST) 


Torsten... on Muzzlewrap.
I have found thet the round stickers available at stationary stores work well... they come in different colors, and sizes, 1/2", 3/4", 1", etc... they are similar to target patching "dots". I use the 3/4" black ones and stick 'em on the muzzel. They turn to microscopic confetti before the bullet gets to the muzzel, and I can't find any residue. They have not affected first round POI when I first tried them on the bench with .308, and .223 rifles. They are easy to remove if you don't shoot.
Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 06:40:45 (EST) 
Torsten,
Ditto on what Pablito says, that or a piece of tape if you use a break you may want to stay with the glove fingers or a condom.

Mike S,
Thanks for the comeback! I seen a picture of one and they look like they would be a nice tool for law enforcement or humping over hill and dale.

Bill R.
I think it depends on the dealer, some wont sell you a PSS without a dept. letter head and the next will sell it to anyone.

James R,
If you go back into the archives you will find pages of discussion on the 06 vs the 08 and I think you will find that the 308 wins hands down for many reasons butd if you have an 06 it will make a fine "Sniper" rifle for you.
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 07:37:46 (EST) 


Re: Muzzlewrap

I use Scotch tape, the "brittle(?)" one. I have no change of POI on my sniperrifle. I've had problems with condensation inside the barrel under changeing temperatures. On long patrols(hunts these days) I put a dry patch through the barrel each day and put a new wrap on.
 

TorF
Oslo, Norway - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 07:52:43 (EST) 


"Exclusive tripod."

I "tested" the dorsal "turret" a genuine Heinkel He 111 bomber yesterday. Single MG15, magazenes in rack, installed. My goodness! Not a place to be when Spitfires and Mustangs are shooting at you. Where's the foxhole?
 

TorF
Oslo, Norway - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 08:01:59 (EST) 


The 30-06; Ah what a great rifle in 03 springfield. It will never go out of favor with me. Most moderns have gone to the 30-06 short. (sometimes called .308 nato or a variation .308 Winchester) and are perfectly happy. There was a guy once who used a 30-06 in Winchester MOdel 70. another fine old piece and did quite well as a sniper with it or so the legend goes. IT is said in some circles that it's day is done and that may be so. Like old legends it will eventually wind up in the museums but the 30-06 is hard to beat. You will hear how it is not as accurate as .308 but it is a matter of loading and design I suspect. We've been through the contraversy to many times. Check the archives for the discussions. It is a wonder to me that no one has ever built a action that feeds and loads as good as a Sprinfield. All other rifles are wannabees in my book. Give it modern steel and new bedding designs and what else would you want. I need to shut up now!
B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 08:45:42 (EST) 
Will: If memory serves me correctly, the services went to CLP because it was one product to carry as opposed to a minimum of three (ie: bore cleaner, oil, and grease). The product they chose is remarkably similar to Break Free, and I believe if it was analyzed chemically, we would discover it IS Break Free. It does have the ability to clean the bore, perhaps not as well as some of the products we all use, but under less than great conditions, it will work. It will also perform lubricant duties as claimed, and is in fact a good product. Should you be limited to only one product it would be the one to carry. I've seen and shot Depity Dave's rifles on many occasions; his AR works as advertised and better. Guess the lube is doing its job.
Fred
People's Rep. of, MD USA - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 09:17:52 (EST) 
dUDES!

Herr Spinne Doktor,

Not to be Marcus Welby or anything, but this dumb hillbilly observes the politicaly correct term here in the US of A is "Personal Protective Equipment" for gloves, and other protective barriers against all kinds a terrible socially spread, debillitating Bloodborne Pathogens, e.g. HIV, Hepatittis A-D, Ebola, Lyme Disease, VD, Herpes, MDR-Tuburculosis, ad nauseum. oh DID GRAMPS SEND YOU ONE OF THE GENUINE SWEDISH MUZZLE ENLARGERS? Hmmmmmmm?

Where is Gramps folks, i kinda miss him?

Man, I wouldn't waste a perfectly good condom on muzzle protection, they can be washed and used again! ;-) I like the targ dot/ paster idea, THATS GREAT! how do they hold up in rain n sleet?

Mike M, once again Most Excellent Post on rip-offs and equipment that is of absolutely no use to ANYONE! Liars be damned and EXPOSED!

Will, Naugas with a .308? Nope make mine at least .375 H&H preferably a .600 NE double! Oops I was thinking of something else Ah-Duh!

Depity,
C'mon now, free-sparring with a Babe can be lotsa fun and lead to many absolutely compromising positions, without that Femi-nazi type attitude. Now Hows that for outlandish folks!

Gooch, Right said as usual!
peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
Big City, bY-GaWd USA - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 09:30:20 (EST) 


peteR... the stickie dots work well in rain or sleet/snow. I don't think I would like to leave the rifle leaning muzzel up in a heavy downpour for hours... but then, I don't leave my rifles that way for about twenty other reasons. If your on a stalk for the beastie in heavy torrents, I'd have my longrange rifle (and binoc's, laser, etc) in cases, until I got to my FFP. If the sought after beastie was one that could shoot back, I'd cover my stalk with my "waterproof" lightweight SP1/CAR.

Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 10:02:20 (EST) 


Torf, drop me a line. I was a pilot before I did anything else interesting in life. That love is still number one. Your comments piqued my interest! An HE 111 by God. I snuck in one once. Won't say where. Tell me more!

Ok guys. Marius is going to archive this weekend.
Here is your new Warning Orders: Once this mess has gone into the SC history books, I would humbly request we all get back ON TOPIC. That topic is sniping. Sniping history. Sniper gear. Plus related comments and story's about the topic. You quite LE and military guys who surf in silently, please pipe up. This site is for you and could use your insight.
I have received a fair amount of mail recently on how the Roster has been lacking something lately due in part to a lot of irrelevant topics. The SC staff can not control the subject matter nor do we actively try to. The Roster has pretty much been a free fire zone. While I will not tell you all what to discuss here, I would implore you to please try to keep the comments relevant to the purpose of the site. Whether it is good, bad, or ugly, tell it like it is - but above all, try to keep it tactical and topic related. I hate to be the preach. It doesn’t suite me well and I usually botch the job. I am just trying to guide the Roster back to it’s old shining self. Above all, those of you who are dissatisfied with the recent content of the Roster, please keep in mind that the real meat of the Site is the main page and its subcategories. The Roster was provided as a way to allow the readership to contact each other and learn more than we, the staff, can provide in our written essays. Use it wisely. But remember at all times that the Roster is not SC. It is just one small part of it.

On firearms instructors and schools: The SC staff can not attend every school in the states (although we would surely like too). Therefore we can not comment intelligently on each school and what it has to offer. Schools wishing for us to attend, for review purposes, please contact us and we will do everything in our power to attend. We can not always guarantee a show, but we will try to fit our schedules to mutual agreement.

There are a lot of interesting techniques out there and many work in one fashion or another. Some techniques are dated and others are unproven. We at SC can not be the judge but are always willing to listen and learn. If you, the reader, have been to these schools and can express yourself clearly, consider writing a review for SC.

As far as instructor credentials go, I am not of the opinion that one has had to have been shot at or shot to be a good defensive handgun instructor, rifle guru or gun pundit, nor do they need to have years of special experience. On the other hand, they do need a good coach or primary instructor to impart the necessary skill that will be passed on to the students. And they do need to be able to teach a chosen method, and be able to back that method up with logic and thought. My only beef with any instructor, weather he is new or has been at it since the invention of the toilet, is when he presents himself as something he is not. If he is good enough, he needn’t embellish his credentials. His teaching methods alone will suffice. That is all I have to add to this topic. Go forth and train.

Scott <xring@voicenet.com>
USA - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 10:51:10 (EST) 


Power to you Scott !

the order of the Month:

"go forth and train !!!!"

I like that, no hunkydory Gungho BS, just like it is, almost as good as "Hold hard". Where is Rick ??

Pete,

The "Jellomeister once called Gramps" has been building a barn for his new horsy´s, and froze his Jetwalker in a pile of horseexhaust. He should be thawing out soon and be on Deck again shortly !

Muzzlewrap !

with our G-3´s we unscrew the flash hider place a piece of plastic bag over it and srew the thing back on.
protects the bore and doesnt look like a Cristopher day parade !

I remember the days when we were issued black platic muzzlecaps, and that we as DI´s used to pay for a case of beer when one of our pups send one down range! I may get some for "the nephew" and LeMay !

I´ve also seen some of the foamy ear plugs as well as muzzleplug, but not really great for a schnipper, ehhh!

Do it !

"Ende"
Torsten <lasercon@dialup.globe.de>
G3ermany - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 11:43:44 (EST) 


Regarding Kevin East's poem.
I really understand how you feel - BUT - PLEASE do not wish these people on us. They seldom make good Canadians (though to be fair I have seen cases where they have growen up )
It was a mastake to accept these deserters and draft dogers in the first place I know. But given our relationship with the US and the laws at the time there was not much the goverment could do.
You would not believe the joy when Ford and Carter pardoned them !
No suprise when so many found that the could make more money and pay less taxes they packed up and went 'home'.
Please forgive my rant but the feeling of abused hospatility sits ill.

Jiliyan
Jiliyan Milne <jiliyan@hotmail.com>
Toronto, Ont. Canada - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 11:47:53 (EST) 


Modern technology has helped some parts of shooting, no question. Constantly amazed though at how many of the pundits simply replace walking with talking about walking.

Shooting is no diff, imho, than stick training, knife training, etc. You gotta do it to get good at it, and the only way to find out if you are any darned good is to go full contact [in a manner of speaking] with someone better than you. Recently listened to 2 guys argue over the better / worse than attributes of the Accuracy International and the PSG-1. Know both of them well, I have shot both of their rigs, and like 'em both. Guarantee not a case of rounds have gone through either gun, probably not through both guns combined. Lordy, they wouldn't shoot guns like that in the pouring rain, sleet, snow. Causes one to smile.

I enjoy this forum much, although I mainly lurk. My advice on the whole Savage / 700 / 70/ whatever debate is simply to find a gun that fits you, and then pour ammo through it under every cirmcumstance imaginable. Personally, don't give two good sh**s about what others think of my rigs. Can you hit with your gun? Seems the only relevant question.

Take care, all.

Old Dog
Bruce <Bruce@mannlawfim.com>
USA - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 11:51:41 (EST) 


Help !

just uncamoed my 86SR and below the camotape I struck "Natogold".

It used to hold up fine under just burlap wrap, but I guess the stickum in the tape keeps the moisture in. I´ll soak it overnight and brush it with steel wool in the morning. Or I´ll just paint it again, what do you think Gooch, the Walmart special ?

Done for the day and fixin to schmuse with the Frau.
T-man <turn left at the next light and the 6732 blocks east>
G3ermany - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 12:02:42 (EST) 


Bruce,
Good post, I've shot the barrel out of two Remington VSs in 308. I now have a Schneider SS on one and it was rebarreled in May of 98 and before it went to Wyoming in August I put 1750 rounds through it. I love to shoot and the new SS barrel isn't anymore accurate than the old Remington barrel was and not as accurate as the other Remington barrel was but I hope to get a lot more rounds out of it!! So having a fancy custom gun does'nt make you a better shot, You need to shoot a lot in rain, wind and cold to be a good shot because it never works out that when you need to make a shot it's 70 degrees with no wind. The same with Martial Arts you better train for the real world or the "DOJO" mentality will get you hurt in real life.
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 12:25:27 (EST) 
PABLITO,

Thanks for the clarification on pasties, jUST EXACTLY IS A SP1/CAR? AN M-4 VARIANT?

Where is Mr. Bowcher??
Rick you still with us, or building a Sav'age Snipers suprise for the '99 matches? I'll cut you a deal on a slightly used generic 3-9 X-mart scope that will just finish the package perfectly!

Oh I forgot to post earlier, those that have a fascination with any conceivable glory involved with taking a life, spend a week watching "Life in the ER" on cable, run with a ambulance crew some weekend, or peruse a text like "Gunshot Wounds".
That should be enough to switch thoughts back to paper or metal targets.

Chao!

peteR
peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
DAZED n CONFUSED IN, bY-gAWd USA - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 12:42:41 (EST) 


TorF,
Another pilot would be interested in hearing your HE 111 story. Haven't seen one since my Navy days in Spain.

Sorry to clutter up the site; but TorF didn't leave his address.
Doc <docs@fidnet.com>
The Ozark boonies, MO USA - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 12:55:26 (EST) 


I think all of you with postal match ideas have hit onto something, but we also need a category for nothing later than WWII. It will give us Dinosaurs some pleasure, and some of you "wet behind the ears" types a chance to mess with antiques (the rifles as well). Any support for this out there?
Fred (the Dinosaur Dudester)
People's Rep. of , MD USA - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 12:57:38 (EST) 
I agree with the posting about you don't have to have ben shot to teach shooting. I for one other than one SWAT accident no one has ever shot me and I plan to keep it that way. (No I didn't shoot myself). I have been teaching for about fifteen years and know alot of instructors are better than me, but I keep tring to get better. If I teach a class you will get all my efforts to make it a learning experience. A clue to all teachers out there: You learn from your students as much as they learn from you. Someone always has soom information you don't. Get off your High Horse and be human. Enough said on the subject.

Now to whoever bad mouthed PSS'S. Son get out and shoot and quit thinking about it. No Bench racer ever one a race and no Tecno Shooter has enough going to win a match or save a life. Trust me if you are a bad guy you don't want me looking at you through my scoped PSS at any range. Bottom line is what Plaster said Police Snipers need a one minute or less rifle. Every PSS I have shot would do 1/2 to 3/4 minute and that equals lights out right now for bad guys.

Tor's E-mail me your address I have something for you to test in your climate. The UnDude Mike
Mike M. <DMMDNLN@AOL.COM>
Calif. USA - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 13:10:29 (EST) 


All,

Does anyone know of a commercial source for the "E" silhouette backers commonly used in USMC weapons training?
Jon Custis <custisja@navair.navy.mil>
Orlando, FL USA - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 13:45:11 (EST) 


A match for the old geezer rifles? Hmm...could prove interesting. Guess I'd better get this here No.1 Mk4 (T) zeroed in and stop fondling the darn thing. It will only do about 1.5 moa but try telling that to a boat load of dead Heers soldaten.
Oh, sorry Torsten! Hey, you can bring a G-43 with ZF4! And a Mauser 98k with an Ajax! This could be a pretty interesting match! Now, who is going to be the wise-ass that shows up with a Carcano? Bet Fred brings a Brown Bess...or a Whitworth! Gooch? Bet he brings a big slag ROCK.

Now, I will do something to hopefully start some serious healing around here. I hereby apologize to "Voice". I probably misunderstood his intent and jumped on him for reasons best left unsaid. We may never see eye to eye, but as part of this staff I should not have fired a broadside so readily. To the rest of you, stand easy. Lets’ keep this thing professional. Even when the staff sometimes doesn’t.

Out.

Scott <xring@voicenet.com>
USA - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 13:51:39 (EST) 


I would like opinions on the new Remington PSS Tactical vs. the standard as far as accuracy. I have been looking at the standard now for about a year and when I decided to buy one they had the tactical with the 20" barrel so now I am not sure what I want. The guy I talked to claims the tactical is just as accurate as the standard. I find that hard to believe. Any opinions from more experienced shooters would be a great help. Thanks

Chris
Chris Newkirk <airmechanic@att.net>
USA - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 14:14:31 (EST) 


Reloaders,
Will I get a pressure increase if I have a compressed load?? I started loading 140MKs for my new 260 and they take up a "LOT" of the case and loading them sounds like I'am crunching rocks in the case. My main concern is with the Reloader 22 I have heard this powder is touchy, any thoughts??
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 15:06:40 (EST) 
Tactical Firearms Training Team (http://www.tftt.com) will be holding a 3-day optical rifle class at the Sacramento Valley Shooting Center on Feb. 27 through Mar. 1. Topics include shooting positions, balistics, wind doping, range estimation, camoflauge and stalking. You'll need suitable equipment and 300 rds match ammo. Cost is $450, half in advance. Contact Ed Worley at the Sacramento NRA office, 916-446-2455, if interested.
Grasshopper <wd6cmu@netcom.com>
Richmond, CA USA - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 15:51:32 (EST) 
I am also a kid, don't think that I am Big Sniper because I don't want everyone getting mad at him. I also like shooting. I am a tomboy as you would call it. I was wondering what you would do if we didn't stay off the site. What are you going to do arrest us? What gives you the right to tell us what to do? I AM NOT BIG SNIPER SO DO NOT THINK THAT!
Big Sniper II <cheergirl69@juno.com>
USA - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 15:56:36 (EST) 
Chris,

In a nutshell, longer barrels usally give a little extra velocity and the balance seems better to many on offhand and "leading" /tracking shots. Noise is further from the shooter too.

Pat(Mr bullet)
Duuuuude, Caveat Reloader Man. Check with the Pro's

Jiliyan, Nice post, You've met our Prez then??

Big SniperII (Cheerleader69) read my post at 12:42 hrs TODAY,

We don't need adolescent challenges. Most of us have kids and want them protected from danger and irresponsible actions.

I was a kid once, believe it or not, and when I went with my dad to get ammo for formal shooting matches, reloading components etc. etc All those "fat old boys" hanging at the gunstore used to give me a hard time.
I usually left feeling angry and humiliated, but I know for a fact and proved their mouths could not match their skill, (or mine) on more than one occassion. I practiced as often as my allowance and fathers generousity made practical.

By all means shoot and shoot often, with your parents supervision,

Maturity is shown by actions not words, if you have not picked up on that from this wonderful web site, STAFFERS, and the Duty Roster regulars.

Dino-Dudester,
I'm glad you got the "fever" too! Maybe we can hook up and compare notes. Bill Brophy taught me alot about you old guys, and why they deserve respect, SIR!

Folks Lets Rock N RoLL!

peteR
peter <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
TUPPERWARE CITH AHHHHHHHHHHH, bY-gAWD USA - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 17:18:36 (EST) 


Rick is knee deep in conducting a course.

CLP is good for lots of shit. Just dont clean the bore on match rifles with it. It leaves a teflon residue behind, which is what it was designed to do.

Muzzle caps - condoms. Unlubricated.

Lil sniper girl. Good attitude, bad judgment. THis isnt the place for you.

E sillouettes. Never seen them as a civilian target but most of the military targets come from the National Target Company. Ask the NRA?

Picking a good instructor? Look for enthusiasm and a willingness to teach from the heart. Also avoid the instructor who claims to know everything and has a bunch of "techniques" that he claims credit for. Believe me, you can track down most of the new marksmanship techniques back to some real old books. Avoid instructors who dont force you to crawl, then walk, then run. The fundamentals must be understood before you can move to the high speed stuff. Look for instructors who dont mind if you want to go to other instructors to compare programs. Compare prices. Some folks will really jam you. Ask to see credentials and dont be afraid to call around and check on people. Avoid instructors who rest on thier past laurels and havent fired a shot in years. Go to competitions and see who hires people to shoot for them or who goes out and competes himself.

AND ABOVE ALL...If you want to learn how to shoot, go to a Marine or a Soldier. If you want to learn to swim, go to a Sailor (Seabees excluded Murph). Yeah baby yeah! Stir it up!

See ya
 
 

gooch <gooch@stormmountain.com>
Elk Garden , WV USA - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 17:34:30 (EST) 


To Gooch,
 

Ive been in the Marines for about a year and a half. Im now trying to get into competitive shooting and would appreaciate any recommendations on equip. I would also like more information on your school, requirements, gear, cost etc.. Next, for any others out there, any opinions or info. on competitions in my area "Tx" would be welcome. I dont have a computer of my own so please send any comments to my home. Thank you for your time and keep up the good work.

Semper Fidelis,

Pfc Anthony Wright
3701 Northpark Drive
Corsicana, Tx 75110
 

Pfc Anthony Wright USMCR <NA>
Corsicana, Tx USA - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 17:57:19 (EST) 


My comments for the day,
Someone poked fun at old Sarge for his modest claims of doing in pop cans at 200 yards. Just my opinion, but if one can achieve that level of accuracy from field positions, this is nothing to sniff at. And a rifle must be capable of holding 1.3 minutes horizontal and about 2 moa vertical to insure hits. Many rifles can do this. Not many shooters can make the same claim.
The great 30-06 vs 308 debate. Someone made the claim that according to the duty roster archives, the 308 wins hands down. I think the jury is still out on that one. Just because a bunch of guys here say so doesnt make it true.
On the 03 Springfield. I have a few, If I didnt like them I would not have bought the second one. I have had parts break on them. 2 ejectors to be exact. I have heard that the firing pin design is not the best. The best thing about the Springfield or any other popular mil-surp rifle is that the parts that are prone to breakage can be picked up at gunshows for next to nothing and can be replaced by the home gunsmith. I have had little parts break on M700's and M70's and the wait to get replacement parts can take months. 2YK can be expected to delay this downtime even more. A functioning Springfield beats a non functioning Remington, Winchester, or Savage any old day. I have never had anything break on a Mauser yet, but I am ready for the day that it happens, if I live that long.
Steve <nato@bright.net>
S.C.D.H., Ohio USA - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 18:04:39 (EST) 
Whoever just posted is the most rude and obnoxious person! I did NOT post the message about Gooch, I want whoever did to E-mail me! You are a JERK!!!!!! I did not post the one about Gooch!
    ( Webmaster:  So I removed it )
Big Sniper II <cheergirl69@juno.com>
USA - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 18:57:55 (EST) 
SARGE,

You seem to have the most experience with Savages....help me out. I'm thinking of purchasing a 110FP (.308) in the Spring and have seen both good and bad comments. A couple of years ago I talked my old man into buying a Rem 700PSS in .308 and it has always shot like a dream. Will I wish that I had purchased a PSS ? Will I be trying to make modifications(stock, trigger, etc.) to the 110FP. Tell me more...please.

What aftermarket stocks will be offered in the future for the 110FP?

Anyone else that would like to respond....please feel free !
 

Thanks for your help SARGE ! (For ALL of your postings)
Ken <kknjoey@webzone.net>
Broken Arrow, OK USA - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 20:01:02 (EST) 


Steve (nato@bright.net)

You should read the article titled "Accuracy Facts: The .308 versus the .30-06 "

It's found in "Articles and Commentary" on Snipercountry's website.

Then tell us what you think about it.
 

Ken <kknjoey@webzone.net>
Broken Arrow, OK USA - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 20:35:35 (EST) 


Scott,
Re: Warning Orders

Agree with you 100%. I too have noticed a general decline in the technical aspects of sniping on this forum; too much blather. This has happened only in the last couple of months or so. Some people are posting personal junk that means nothing to 99% of the forum. Think people!!! Some of the postings from (unnamed) are just garbage. Only rarely can I decipher any of it.

Don't know how to stop it unless you go to a email list setup. That way you can filter out what is unnecessary by moderating with a heavy finger on the delete key. I only hope this forum will moderate themselves.
Ron N.
Ron N. <rcn8@accnorwalk.com>
USA - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 21:19:50 (EST) 


Ken,
I have re-read the article that you mentioned for the umpteenth time just for you. And I have the same thoughts about it now as I had 3 years ago. Some of the statements the author made are untrue and others are misleading.
If you are comparing Lake City Match ammo in 7.62 vs 30 cal. Some of what the author says is true. Air space in a cartridge does not help things as far as accuracy is concerned. The powder used in the .30 cal was selected to function in an M1 and if the burning rate of the powder was slower in would have filled the case better but would have created excessive port pressure in the M1. The same powder in a 308 fills the case and this is the reason that Lake City 7.62 is more accurate than Lake City 30-06. This is no reason to condem the 30-06 and a bolt gunner does not have to use medium burning powder. In all the tests and target groups the author mentioned there is not one word of the actual loads used. Furthermore, Lake City 30 cal has never been loaded with the 168 Sierra bullet. It has always used the 172 gr. To comapare Lake city 7.62 with the 168 gr. Sierra with Lake city .30 cal using the 172 gr. is also an unfair comparison.
I could go on quite a bit more, but I think that this is enough for you to chew on for a while.
Steve <nato@bright.net>
S.C.D.H., Ohio USA - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 21:44:14 (EST) 
Ron N.
I subjected a Leopould MKIV MI to some severe cold weather. It is mounted on a SSG PII and I was elk hunting at 11,000 ft in Colo. The temp was -10 and blowing snow. The barrel and scope were covered with ice and I was in this weather for about 8 hours. The elevation, windage, and focus knobs worked flawlessly and I could not detect any affects on the scope. Hope it helps
Tony Tull <atull@hcnews.com>
Granbury, TX USA - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 21:59:21 (EST) 
Compressed Loads ...
Pressure depends on many things - some powders in some cartridges can do fine with a compressed load (pressure wise) you need to know the dope on your particular cartridge / powder / primer / neck tension / bullet jump / bullet weight / etc / etc.

I can tell you that even if a comppressed load does not send receiver parts flying - more accurate loads are usually built around the very thin line of 98- 99% case volume - under the bullet base. Many good handloaders will "tap" the loaded cases on the table before pushing the bullet down just to make sure the powder settled below where the bottom of the bullet will end up. Just like a box of corn flakes - powder can settle in the case about a million different ways. If you are loading with enough powder to pretty much fill the case some of the thrown charges may end up getting compressed and some may settle just right - consistency will suffer based on this chance settling of powder. The tubular powders 4895 - 4064 and even Varget will settle different each time. If you push a bullet on a powder charge that just happens to stand tall in the case you might compress it, and it may compress in such a way as not to "settle" down through normal handling later on.

J.D.
J.D. Hicks <hicks@zso.dec.com>
Seattle, WA USA - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 22:40:39 (EST) 


Steve...
Your comments about the .306 vs .30-06 are very well made.
It's unrealistic to compare the two, unless they're both being shot witn current barrels, powders, and bullets... under those condx, I doubt if there would be an important difference, and that difference might go either way.
 

Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 22:47:34 (EST) 


Compressed Loads...

I have to say one more thing about pressure in general. One can get excessive pressure from more than just too much powder. If a particular load is at or near max, any change in components or loading technique must be approached carefully.

Heavier brass has less internal capacity, full length sized brass vs. neck sized brass can change internal capacity, hotter - different lot of primers, thicker necks on same kind of brass, different neck sizing dies or full length dies that result in a tighter neck, tighter crimp if you are actually using any crimp at all, a general load of crap inside the neck can result in a heavier grip on the bullet just like a crimp. Bullets seated our farther or some different bullet style / shape of the same weight. Hotter ambient air temperature with a sensative powder, stop using moly. Differnt lot of powder - tumbler crap left in the case.

Get the idea?

J.D.

J.D. Hicks <hicks@zso.dec.com>
Seattle, WA USA - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 23:00:51 (EST) 


Dudes this is it. Im mounting out in the AM. I dont know if I will be making any posts for a couple of days so keep it up while Im gone.

Pfc Wright. email me at Stormmountain in a couple of days. As a member of the reserves you may be able to get onto a team for the Competition in Arms program. FOr a starter check with your S-3 and find out if 4th MarDiv is fielding any shooters for Division matches next spring. If not I've got some other options to talk to you about. There is a real good cahnce we will be conductin a course in Dallas come March. Not sure who is sponsoring it right now. Im not in WV yet. If the USMC route fails I can put you in touch with a Texas National Guard Colonel who is the OIC of the All Guard High Power team and is active in the Texas State Rifle Association who will help you out. He is a big fan of us Jarheads. As far as sniper type matches go I can help you find some of them as well can many of the other yahoos on here. You've come to the right place Marine. Listen and learn.
 

gooch <gooch@stormmountain.com>
USA - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 23:25:28 (EST) 


Pat: my opinion is that nothing drastic is gonna happen on the .260 unless you are actually crushing powder grains. Just to pack it don't make much real pressure change at that point othere than the added powder.
Gooch; You seem to have a little problem back there about 1800 hours. Would you handle that one and get back to us! We're all kind of busy here with important stuff you know what I mean. Old Gooch he always comes through... what a guy!

B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 23:42:49 (EST) 


Scott, Great posts man especialy the fifth paragraph on Monday the 11th of Jan. Couldn't agree with you more.

On the subject of Sniping-How does one limit the flash off of prescription glasses? It seems at times they can act as mirrors or am I totaly wrong here?

Does anyone have a phone number to H.S. Precision? I want to install a third sling swivel lug on my VS to use for bi-pod mount but don't know if there is anything special to watch out for. I read about this in SC reviews.
 

Bill M <billmohr@borg.com>
Central, Ny USA - Wednesday, January 13, 1999 at 23:54:52 (EST) 


Anyone have a pet long range load for a 7MM-08? I will be shooting prone at 800, 900 and 1000 yards. Any help or suggestions appreciated.
Dave
Pathfinder <pathfinder27th@hotmail.com>
Ft. Worth, Texas USA - Thursday, January 14, 1999 at 00:35:53 (EST) 
Missed the scuffle over the weekend, haven't seen you guys that riled up about anything before. Must have been some pretty offensive posts.

Anyway, I haven't seen much discussion if any at all pertaining to Leica's Geovid. I'm not considering buying one, but I'm just curious as to what you guys have to say about them. Anyone I've talked to has does nothing but sing it's praises, aside from the enormous cost, I feel like it's an excellent unit.

Opening the floor, any input would be appreciated.
 

Casey <Caseyb@SCS.UNR.edu>
Reno, Nevada USA - Thursday, January 14, 1999 at 01:14:48 (EST) 


Plane Crash !

just heard it in the radio, last night a AWACS Group 707 Tanker from the National Air Guard crashed after a touch and go at the Geilenkirchen Airbase in Germany. All four crewmembers dead.

My deep respect to them,their families and the others that continue the peacekeeping missions over former Jugoslavia.
Torsten <lasercon@dialup.globe.de>
Germany - Thursday, January 14, 1999 at 02:54:45 (EST) 



Bill, you can get your glasses' anti-reflection coated, just like camera lenses, see your local optometrist.
H-S Precision is 605-341-3006.
Pablito
USA - Thursday, January 14, 1999 at 06:21:47 (EST) 
RE: Young'uns amongst us....

I agree with the policy of "18 or older" for liability concerns, but even that is not a guarantee that some older psychotic will not come in and gather information.

Big Sniper I and II both seem to be innocent enough on the surface, but in light of recent attacks at schools in Arkansas, Oregon, and Kentucky, we all need to be cautious.

An unfortunate truth to the Internet and web sites is that anyone can access them, unless some sort of Age Verification System is used. I have only seen those AVSs used on "Adult Entertainment" sites, to keep the kiddies from seeing porno.

The other side of the coin is that youngsters represent both the future of the shooting sports and the future of politics. (I know: the collective GROAN starts now) We cannot afford to alienate youngsters. Instead of jumping down their throats, maybe we can do something more civil and recommend that they participate in the NRAs Junior Shooter programs. I think that we would all agree that we would like kids to shoot, but we want to keep their interests in areas that are less involved in the "social work" of the business.

Later,

Bruce

By the way, e-mail me if you are planning on attending the SHOT Show. I am in the Atlanta area. We can attempt to coordinate a dinner or something. Maybe Gooch can get Storm Mountain to sponsor it!! :-)
Bruce Braxton <braxton1@aol.com>
College Park P.D., GA USA - Thursday, January 14, 1999 at 08:16:35 (EST) 


Big SniperII,
The incident that happened to you is a perfect example of why they dont want kids on this sight. If you or someone else made the comment doesn't matter. The comment on Gooch only goes to prove that there isn't the maturity there to handle many of the topics discussed on this sight and your comment about "what are you going to do arrest me" shows that maybe you also need more maturing. I think its great that you are interested in shooting but stay with the other shooting sports for now and wait until you older to visit us. I hope you will understand and continue to develop not only your shooting skills but in maturity as well as Bruce said you are our future. Good Luck!!

JD and Bill,
Thanks for the comeback on the compressed loads. I wasn't worried about the normal compression of powder, were talking a bullet going three quarters of an inch down into the powder charge. The powder I am using isn't listed in my loading data. It is listed for the 7mm-08 and I took the light load for the 140gr in the 7-08 to come up with this load in my 260 maybe I am wrong for doing this also any thoughts??
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Thursday, January 14, 1999 at 09:31:16 (EST) 


Wanting to know more about the art of "sniping"........

Jason Cain <race4sex85@hotmail.com>
USA - Thursday, January 14, 1999 at 10:38:12 (EST) 


J.D. I like your post about compressed loads. I use 4064 and 4895. What I have found is if after I drop the load into the case I tap the case a few times, the load will settle. I think this has helped group size. I know it has helped with ave. deviation. Extreme spread over ten rounds, out of my PSS, Fed Brass, Fed Match Primers, Sierra 155 Palma's and 45 grains of 4064 is 26fps. That is very good. So there is something to this. Dump and run charges don't even come close. I think you have something.

Sarge, had a recent class. 30 students all capable of less than one minute at 200 yards from nice range position. Made them stalk a couple of hundred yards, pick a position and shoot at 4" plate from dirt, brush and muck position. Five missed. You are doing fine.

The only thing this site need is spell check.

The UnDude Mike
Mike M. <DMMDNLN@AOLL.COM>
Calif USA - Thursday, January 14, 1999 at 10:43:20 (EST) 


H.S. Precision:

I'm looking for input on the H.S. Precision Pro-series TT2000 Tactical/Long Range Takedown System. Any of you that are going to the SHOT Show might wish to look at this weapon while you are there. All componets are being made by H.S. Precision and I liked what I saw at the Sniper Symposum last week in MD.

Iron Fred will tell you that "Everyone is Entitled to My Openion" but I'm asking for yours.

Stay Safe!
 

Depity Dave <dprolls@access.mountain.net>
Iced Over, West Virginia USA - Thursday, January 14, 1999 at 12:36:39 (EST) 


Holy headshot cow....duck out of here for awhile and things go to hell in a .50 cal ammo can.

You need body armour and a security detatchment just to sandbag on the roster. Lighten up gentlemen. If you are personnally offended by someone else's opinion, maybe you need to go get some counseling to deal with what ever lack of emotional maturity to have...or don't.

Gooch, I really appreciate the clarity and forthrightness of your opinion...great job. I am really looking forward to recieving instruction from you at SMTC. Hoist Me!

Does Any one have any experience with Zero( brand name) Laminated stocks? They are available from Brownells. They have a stock that looks just like a McMillan A-2 and weighs in at 3lbs. I looked at it and looked at it, and finally ordered one....Ah...whew, well here goes...for my Savage 110 FP....The barrel finally went to SH**. and after only 4000 rounds...Hmmm. Imagine that. So I am Having it rebarreled with a Schnieder barrel. I have been looking for a "reasonable" Stock....This Zero thing goes for 275 or something like that. And comes ready to "drop in". That kind of scares me. The Savage action is "okay" So I thought it deserved another chance.

Yes, I am a Winchester Fan okay!! I don't care who makes what...as long as it works. If it had the Pope's name on it and it is a peice of doo doo I'm deep sixin' it.

So..Open for discussion...Zero Stocks...anybody have anything constructive to say about them.
Cory Wilson <Ranger9@hotmail.com>
Panama City, Florida USA - Thursday, January 14, 1999 at 14:19:49 (EST) 


I once saw a police supply catalog that sold small periscopes
(about 24" long) to peek around windows and doorways and also over ledges. This seems to me like a good idea for a LE sniper since he will very likely be close to his target. Using this he could check things over without giving himself away or becoming a target himself.
Any cop snipers think this would be useful or just a waste of money?
Kodiak <rvl@inil.com>
USA - Thursday, January 14, 1999 at 15:06:12 (EST) 
My 2 cents on 30.06

Did't Carlos win at Camp Parry in the 60's with a Win 30.06.

LeMay OUT
LeMay <lemayj@mdot.state.mi.us>
MI USA - Thursday, January 14, 1999 at 16:26:29 (EST) 


ALL:

Nice Ballistics page - right here in the great Northwest.

http://weber.u.washington.edu/~basiji/Ballistics/ballistics.html

J.D.
J.D. Hicks <hicks@zso.dec.com>
Seattle, WA USA - Thursday, January 14, 1999 at 18:12:52 (EST) 


Hello I am looking for Info on a rifle maker named Randy Landon of
Landtec Ltd. He is out of London Kentucky.
I was referred to him by Andy Webber of Armament Technology for
work on my Rem 700 PSS and about buying one of his 300 mags.
Any Info on his rifles will be very appreciated.

S.Barrier
Stephen Barrier <Sbarr25@aol.com>
Chandler , Oklahoma USA - Thursday, January 14, 1999 at 18:57:30 (EST) 


Sarge looks through tired but finally open eyes looks out and fires:

Boy I can't get to the roster for a few days and things do get interesting!
Thanks to everyone that has made comments about me and my poor old Savage! I don't now and never will present myself as any kind of "expert" when it comes to shooting and weaponry. I only admit to 20 years of active US Army service and a love of shooting! If I happen to have picked up a little (very little) :-) knowledge of shooting along the way and can pass that on I will! I am also one - as those that have e-mailed me on some question or another - that if I don't know the answer WILL SAY SO!!
As an old professor of mine once said - the only dumb question is the one you DON'T ask! So for all our new and some of the "older" readers and lurkers if you have a question by god ASK - someone else probably has the same question. BUT, there is always a but (pun intended), please check the "Hot Tips and Cold Shots" you could very well find the answer there, if not ASK!! We all can learn no matter how many years, months, days we've been doing this!
On the "Great Rifle Debate" - again as others have said - find a weapon you are comfortable with, can afford, and can hit what you aim at then PRACTICE, PRACTICE, PRACTICE this is the ONLY way to develop ANY kind of proficiency at all!!
Well I know there was something else I was going to say but Mrs. Sarge just said dinner is ready so guess I better git while the gittin's good!

Sarge

Sarge <garryrn@dfn.com>
Area 51, NM USA - Friday, January 15, 1999 at 00:24:39 (EST) 


Hey Guys,
I have some targets that I make on computer and I print them on cardstock paper which is very thick and good for shooting at. They look really nice! If anybody wants a few for free then E-mail me and I'll send you some! Ignore this, I'm just trying to see if HTML works on this message board.
 

Sniper Country

One Shot, One Kill

J.K. Crawford <sniperjk@juno.com>
USA - Friday, January 15, 1999 at 00:36:56 (EST) 
I am a begining sniper. What kind of groups should I be looking for. My bosses are telling me one thing, and I hear another from you fellows. Also, some pointers and lessons learned that you wish you could have known about a long time ago.
Cody Hollenbeck <ARBNINFTRY@msn.com>
Midwest City, OK USA - Friday, January 15, 1999 at 00:45:01 (EST) 
Hello everyone, I would be a lurker to this list and had to pipe up about a post from a couple of days ago. I called Remington this morning with concern about the demise of the 700 VS. They assured me that none of the 700 line was being cancelled. The only difference this year would be the addition of the composite barrel line. So don't worry they are still making what you want. Also spoke to my gun dealer about the 700 PSS. They said that they could get me into the 300 win mag model for 689 dollars. Is that a good price or do you all have the low down on a cheaper source for this rifle? Also I believe that Carlos won that competition in the 60's with a .300 win mag. Tell me if I'm wrong. Open for comments here.
LeRoy <leroy.brown@MCI2000.com>
Lawson, Mo USA - Friday, January 15, 1999 at 01:06:30 (EST) 
Thanks for the great sight everyone. guess I'll take Sarge's advise and ask. I hope I didn't miss it somewhere else. Has anyone had any experience with the Burris Black Dimond line of scopes. The internal construction looks great but I don't know about the glass. Several hunters and hipower shooters have recommended them but they don't subject there scopes to what some of you do.
This is for a "Tacticial" rifle that will see use in school type conditions. No one in my area has any real scopes to touch and feel so I have to take alot of advise on this one. Thanks

TOTO <estes@feist.com>
DO-DA, Kansas USA - Friday, January 15, 1999 at 01:07:12 (EST) 


Warning: This is not a technical post! Well, maybe a little. First, it seems to me that the rub between all the old, grizzled snipers here and the young kids is motivated by perspective. The kids are curious, so they visit sites like this one but they are also undeveloped and pretty cocky. They are ultra-sensitive to perceived disrespect. Remember all the fist fights we used to get into in the school hallways? I can remember having a similar attitude. These kids have accomplished nothing and they are dying for some validation Then there's us who've served a lot of time in the field and in tough positions of responsibility. Some of us take it personally when we feel that our credibility is being called into question. I know I do. These kids do not have the mental and emotional equipage to fully comprehend the gravity of some of our accomplishments. If they want to call us names on the internet, so what? They wouldn't do it to our faces more than once. We all know this deep down inside. I say remove the posts because they do not further the purpose of this forum. Its like keeping spent primers on your garage floor. They're worthless and you get rid of them. Freedom of Speech? This website is privately owned. Some of these kids will go on to do what we have done, in some cases more, and they will assume our positions and prejudices as the new crop of young smart asses disrespect them.

Ron N. I have never had a misfire. The only factory ammo I shoot is that which the Army provides. Otherwise, I can't afford to shoot anything but my own reloads. I have used an RCBS case prep center thingy since it appeared because I like the way the primers all go in to the same depth. Its got a stop collar that's factory set, as I'm sure you know, and I think you were right on the money in stating that your pocket uniformer may be removing too much metal. I'd machine a two-half split stop collar if, necessary, to limit the cutting depth. If I could get away with making one similar to a split locking ring for a reloading die then that would probably be simpler. Good luck with it.

Sincerely,
Paul J. Headlee <the wife's got the computer at college>
Ogden, KS USA - Friday, January 15, 1999 at 01:37:04 (EST) 


I'm looking for opinions on medium- to high-end "sniper" rifles. I shoot a monthly 200-1000 yard tactical match and want something with excellent practical accuracy, but also transportable and can be taken into the field and knocked around without loosing zero. Who do people think make the best? Chandler? Texas Brigade Armory? Harris? Autauga? Black Star? I'm not ready to shell out cash just yet, but I'm trying to get an idea of who I should (or shouldn't) concentrate on. What's your experience? Thanks!
Grasshopper <wd6cmu@netcom.com>
Richmond, CA USA - Friday, January 15, 1999 at 02:03:31 (EST) 
Hi everyone. I am considering making an investment in one of two sniper rifles---Dual purpose kind. I'd still like to use the gun as a sporting rifle to hunt(deer, elk, bear). I am strongly considering a Springfeild M14 which is a .308 Cal, but the cost is astromonical to obtain one of these. A match grade runs about 1299.00 + the cost of a receiver. One can obtain a Norinco "Copy" around 650.00, but then to be really a great gun, ya still need to do up grades. The second one I am considering is a "Dragunov" 7.62 X 54R which is in all reality a .308 cal also. Can anyone out there, give me their opinion as to which of the two (either the M14 or the dragunov is a better gun). Lets pose the question if the 7.62 X 54R is around a 1000.00 and a loaded GI issue M14 is 1299.00--Which would you chose and Why?

Are ther advantages of the Dragunov over the M14? Are there Disadvantages of the Dragunov over the M14? I personally would be concerned as for replacement parts for the dragunov, but have been advised that this might be unfounded. As for the M14, the parts cost $$ is outragious! ANYONE OUT THERE, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO GIVE ME YOUR OPINION <> Furthermore, if anyone out there has a good Norinco M14 for sale, EMAIL ME!!!!!
Dave <CrzyHotrod@AOL.com>
Wichita, Kansas USA - Friday, January 15, 1999 at 02:21:30 (EST) 


I have the new XIII 3-9 M3 LR Scope. Can you tell me why when I move the
windage knob up (right as arrow indicates) my reticle moves left ? If my memory
serves me right, I thought down was right and up was left on the windage. Also,
I'm not able to move the elevtion knob to the 1000 meter mark (or 10) . I have centered this to mechanical zero and can't seem to figure out why. Any input would be greatly appreciated.
Robert Lee <http://www.MilDot3666@AOL.COM>
USA - Friday, January 15, 1999 at 03:06:36 (EST) 
RE: M1As, Chinese M-14s, and the Dragunov

Dave,

IF you HAVE to have a semi-auto, stay away from the Chinese M-14 and the Dragunov...

I would like to have a real Dragunov w/ optics, just for its historical value, but that is it. The 7.62X54R is, in fact, a .30 cal, but that is all that it shares with the .308. It is not nearly as stable and consistent with either the .308 or the -06. Aberdeen Proving Grounds personnel were not impressed with the Dragunov, giving it a Max. Effective Range of only 800M. By the way, if you're not a military person, that is not an impressive number for a Sniper-grade rifle.

The Chinese M-14s had all sorts of receiver problems last time I checked. The bolt lug recesses became badly peened because the receivers were too soft. This allowed the headspace to quickly open up, resulting in an unsafe gun.

The Springfield M-1A is a good gun and is certainly capable of out-shooting most humans behind it. You get what you pay for.

Lest people think that I am auto-bashing, my primary L.E. sniper gun is a custom AR-15....

The gun that I am quickly becoming fascinated with is the Stoner SR-25. Everything that I am hearing indicates that it blows the ArmaLite out of the water for accuracy. If I go the auto-308 route, it may just be with one of those, unless I go .260 Remington on the same platform.

Later,

Bruce
Bruce Braxton <braxton1@aol.com>
College Park P.D., GA USA - Friday, January 15, 1999 at 04:23:13 (EST) 


Pat; you must be wrong by doing that cause I'm sure that's just exactly what I would have done. Long as your groups are good and your pressure is manageable I'd shoot that load specially is it shoots better varget.
I believe Carlos did use a 300 win in that match but ain't absolutely sure. But he could have won with a 30-06 if it has the same stuff we do to rifles to clean them up these days. Ain't nothing magic about a 30-06 case. He is said to have used the 30-06 for most of his work in Vietnam.
Dave; your right about the price of the M-14 parts. I think if you spend a appropriate amount (maybe $1500 or $2000 you can get the M1a1
match to shoot pretty good. It will probably serve you better than the Russian thing! However the Druganov is quite reliable and somewhat rugged. It's much easier to take down and maintain. If group size is all important the American gun will probably out perform it hands down.
Robert Lee; if I understand what your saying that is the normal movement for all scopes. The impact point will indeed move right when the cross moves left. I'm afraid I don't quite understand your other question. But when a Leupold gets tired of going up it just quits moving but the turrent does not. It will still move but the cross just stops. Do you mean that it won't come to the mark 10 or the cross doesn't move enough to get to 1000 yard zero? If the latter is true it is very unlikely that the scope will move that high especially if the 100 yard zero is around the center of the dial range because there just isn't usually that much movement and you will have to go to tapered mounts. Gosh help somebody! I'm making it worse.
Relevancy again maybe but I just saw where the City of New Orleans sued every gun maker in sight for building these dangerous things called guns. So Kids... I hope you can understand why we can't do a lot of exchanges about things the law says you can't own till your 18! I know we have a 1st ammendment and all that but it is about as bonafide as the second ammendment these days. I wonder why in the heck they would put up with the likes of us anyway! Some of these birds are so elite they won't even talk to each other you shouldn't find it that strange! I hear the tape store has sniper on special for a dollar today!
Cody! here goes my neck again... but if you can keep them under 1 moa
1"@`100 and 10"@1000 for those in Rio Linda. You ain't gonna miss much. Ok the bench boys can do better but if you can do 1moa ALL the time you are doing pretty good. And that is achievable. It ain't bragging good but it's gonna do the job. You should try to do better but the answer is ... the best groups you can get as consistant as you can make them.
Leroy! Thanks for the info. I sleep better now as soon as the nurse gets here with my medicine!
Toto; What wonderful questions? I don't know Jack S...about a Black Diamond but I wish someone would tell us.

B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Friday, January 15, 1999 at 05:07:40 (EST) 


Dave:

I have a Norinco M305, and after a lot of tuning it can shoot 4 inch groups at 300 Meters on some days and only with reloaded Match ammo.
It groups better than our issued G-3ZF, but it will never be as acurate as a bolt Gun.

I read no mention of optics in you question, you should plan on spending the same amount or more for a good scope and mount than you do for your rifle.

Now if you really need a "brass thrower" I would go along the M 14 / M 305 route as it offers plenty of aftermarket parts to improve the system as you go along.

But always remeber that even though you´ll look like "Rambo tito" it will never shoot as good as a bolt gun. And Semi´s tend to put this strange "spray & pray" reflex in your trigger finger leading your subconsion to a "ehh what the heck I have 19 more to go" mentalety were the one shot does´nt count anymore.

I went along your route,learned by doing it, but I am settled between the two worlds now with a bolt gun with 9 round mag.

Still have my M305/21 and it´s fun to shoot, but never would I trade my bolt gun for it.

Stay with what Bruce also mentioned, buy the Dillon video and a bolt gun.

Robert:

"Been there done that", you need a forward canted scope mount to come up to 1000 Meters. Take of the elevation knob and you can see the end of travel stop where you are hitting against now.
The scope will need to be zeroed with only a few clicks remaining toward the bottom, but a lot of MOA´s up.

Search the review section of the main page for the tapered shims, they will do you fine without having to mill an forward angle into your existing mount like I did. Ehem !
But I was a happy sniperpuppy when after I did the math, milled the angle, put everything back together, added the MOA´s to the elevation, and hit the 1´x1´target backer without another zero. It was right there were my calculations put it after angeling the mount.
It´s fun when math works for you this way.

"Ende"
Torsten <lasercon@dialup.globe.de>
G3ermany - Friday, January 15, 1999 at 05:57:47 (EST) 


LANTECH
When I was stationed at Campbell I saw lantech 300WM's at the Nashville gun shows. If memory serves they used Sako actions, fluted, braked barrels (cannot remember the barrel mfr), McM A3 stocks, and the package ran about $2200 with a L&S VariX III scope and harris bipod. They had "test" targets that showed .26 MOA 100m groups with Winchester factory ammo (180gn Silvertips, I think). The rifle LOOKED good, but give them a call. Can't hurt.

Ed_Engler <Ed_Engler@softhome.net>
CP Greaves, ROK - Friday, January 15, 1999 at 06:33:43 (EST) 


Robert Lee...
I took me a while to figgure out the first part of your question...
It's toooo early in the morning for this stuff.

"I have the new XIII 3-9 M3 LR Scope..."
(It's a 3.5x10, I have one and it's a great scope... the 3x9 is a different beastie!)

"... Can you tell me why, when I move the windage knob up (right as arrow indicates) my reticle moves left?"

The arrows and "R" and "L" indicate the direction that the "Group" moves, not the reticle. In order for the group to move "Right", the reticle must move left... If the gun is shooting 3" to the left, you must move the reticle over to superimpose it on the group... it looks like the group is moving right, but the reticle is really moving left.

"I'm not able to move the elevtion knob to the 1000 meter mark (or 10)."

You need tapered bases, or base shims... they will give you the extra you need. You can't use the 3.5x10 M3-LR-SF with standard bases.

"If my memory serves me right, I thought down was right and up was
left on the windage."

It often is, but which way the knob turns to go "right", is determined by which element, or optical group, is being moved to accomplish the "windage" adjustment... is this case it is the other way.
 

Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Friday, January 15, 1999 at 10:34:30 (EST) 


Pat;at 1am (bad day in Black Rock)I messed up the post what I was trying to say was that if it shoots better than Varget I would use it.
That is a semi criteria I use these days.
Dave.... Torsten is giving you some real fine advice about the bolt gun. I don't go that far cause people usually don't take that kind of advice when I give it. For one thing the magazines on those guns protrude so low it keeps me from getting down sometimes. The 10 shot one mentioned helps!
Pablito; Question is the M-3 like the others or the 1/4 min click models I mean to say? Does it just quit raising and let the Knob adjustment move on. I got to thinking about that and trying to remember? Maybe the turrent stops when the cross hair stops unlike my 3.5-10 tactical that just quits climbing.

B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.,com>
USA - Friday, January 15, 1999 at 11:44:00 (EST) 


Gooch, Rick, Scott.....
What is the correct lead with the mil dot on a moving target at 100yds.(A mechanical mover) when your not real sure of the speed?? Gooch as and example, the one in Wyoming or one at a shooting range that you have never shot at before, how do I judge lead to hit the center on say an 18" wide target?? I guess what I want to know is there a ball park lead to get me close?? I hope this isn't to confusing.
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Friday, January 15, 1999 at 12:41:12 (EST) 
B.Rogers... on the M3-LR-SF, the dial turns about 7/8 of a turn, to go from the high point of the trajectory (about 50 yds) to the other end, and the stops are in the dial cap. If the scope is properly installed, the reticle tracks from end to the other. The scope itself has about 65 moa of vertical travel... you "Zero" it with a coin, and once zero'ed, you install the cap that matches your caliber/bullet. That cap has a range of about 55 moa (which is, hopefully, in the middle of the the scopes range).

The problem happens when this scope is installed on standard bases.
If done that way, and the scope is "mechanically centered", when zero'ed at 100 yds, you have 35 moa of "down" which is wasted, and 30 moa up... but it takes about 50 moa of up to get a 308 match bullet out to 1000 yards... so you can only get out to about 650/750 yds.
So you use tilted bases, (mine give 25 moa of forward tilt). That way, when zero'ed at 100 yds, you have 10 moa of wasted "down", and 55 moa of up. Then when you put on the BDC cap, you have the whole range available...
 

Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Friday, January 15, 1999 at 10:37:26 (EST) 


To Leroy:I received an e-mail reply from Remington yesterday.They claimed the VS is discontinued for 1999.They were even kind enough to list several firearms wholesalers who have ample stock of VS rifles left in inventory.

I'll gladly forward a copy of this message to anyone who wants one.
 

Jeff Babineau <2jeff@blaikies.ns.ca>
Truro, N.S. Canada - Friday, January 15, 1999 at 11:26:58 (EST) 


ATTENTION!!! Gooch has left "the rock" and he's headed to West By Gawd Virginia. He stopped by my shop and we said our fare wells not 5 minutes ago. Im gonna miss my sniper buddy.

Gooch: Dont forget to do at least a posting when you get there so i know ya got there or else im gonna start spreading rumors that Trisha wasnt really sleeping with her head in your lap last night at the club!!!! And i promise i will come up within 6 months, see, now its written down so I cant weasel out of it. I will even bring the LoveGoddess (Rach or who ever it is at the moment) and the mutt.I wonder what a cross breeding of a Ridgeback and a Rottweiller would look like? Dont forget to put me down for that SMTC match, im gonna kick butt there!! One more thing, you forgot your tripod, i got it fixed. I'll bring it with me.

Gunplumr: I know ya taught me alot, but you also taught me that everybody has their preferences for weapons, (i.e. mine is Rem700s, yours is pre-64s) for whatever reason. So Warren, chill out with the attacks or i will stop sending you links to that porn chick you like!!! Hows Misses Julie these days? And email me, you old fart or call me at the shop!!! I have a problem with a Krico electronic trigger and i need some help, ok?

Well gotta go rebarrel my CAR15 and my Long Gun for the SMTC match.

kudu out
kudu <kudu3@aol.com>
USA - Friday, January 15, 1999 at 11:30:58 (EST) 


Gooch: you forgot your banjo too. Do you want me to send it to you or keep it and bring it with me when i come up there?

kudu out
kudu <kudu3@aol.com>
USA - Friday, January 15, 1999 at 11:35:23 (EST) 


I know this ain't the Emporium, but I can't
let good things pass without leting good people
know

( Removed where it belongs - the Emporium.  Please, that is why the Emporium was set up in the first place, not to clog the Duty Roster with stuff for sale and wanted. )

I have done some dealing with Mike and he is
a square dealer. Others might also be able
to comment.

sl
USA - Friday, January 15, 1999 at 15:19:33 (EST) 


I can vouch for what "SL" said about the source on Tactical scopes.
I just bought 4 B&L 10x Tacticals for $1975, and they were all brand new stock, in boxes, with papers.
Mike is a bonafide source.

Pablito.
 

Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Friday, January 15, 1999 at 16:33:55 (EST) 


Just got a second e-mail from Remington today.It appears as though they may also be getting rid of the chrome moly barrelled Sendero series as well.

They sent me some specifications and prices on the new composite material barrelled VS and Sendero.

Like I said in my earlier post today,anyone who wants a copy of it is welcome to it.Just drop me a line.
Jeff Babineau <2jeff@blaikies.ns.ca>
Truro, N.S. Canada - Friday, January 15, 1999 at 18:51:24 (EST) 


Bruce, I would like to know how you think that the Stoner SR-25 "blows" the Armalite out of the water? I have a Armalite AR-10T with the Mike Rock Barrel in it and it is extremely accurate. A three shot group put all 3 Hornady 168 GR Moly Match Bullets in the same hole at 100 yards with my Leupold Mark 4 M3 10X on top. When I shot the next four rounds, both "pairs" each went into the same hole and the total group was approx .75". I have shot my friends SR-25 and it does not shot better then my AR-10T and for alot less money then the SR-25. So please tell me how the Knights rifle "blows" the Armalite away?
Justin <Just_it@hotmail.com>
USA - Friday, January 15, 1999 at 19:32:07 (EST) 
Kudu,

What did you do to Gooch? No Tripod nor Banjo to rest it on? Hope he headed EAST and not West or he'll be in
peteR <PNGREIFF>
BIG-CITY, bY-gAwD USA - Friday, January 15, 1999 at 21:06:53 (EST) 


Where can i buy 2 new rem short action bolts with .473 boltface. my mag is also sloppy in my 700pss. the main problem that i see is it has around .060 slop. Has anyone tried to build up the frount of the mag to make it fit better? Any help would be apreciated.
Preston
preston <pknc250a@chickasaw.com>
okla USA - Friday, January 15, 1999 at 21:39:47 (EST) 
To SL and Pablito: How about an address and phone number for Mike teh scope dealer. Those prices sound pretty incredible and I would like to know how I can order some scopes from Mike. C'mon you guys, Cough it up!!

al
Al Ostapowicz <aaostapowicz@worldnet.att.net>
Curious in , Ohio USA - Friday, January 15, 1999 at 21:43:19 (EST) 


Al Ostapowicz...
Al Baby, go get some coffee... a lot of coffee.
SL posted Mikes phone number in the post with the scope list.
Mike is in Beverly Hills "90210"... you gotta' send him a P.O. money order... no plastic, no COD's, no nuttin'.

Pablito.
Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Friday, January 15, 1999 at 22:37:34 (EST) 


Have any of you ever had a mil-dot reticle installed in a Leupold 6.5x20? If so, how does it work on prairie dogs? Talked with a very sharp guy at Premier Reticles yesterday and it sounds like a pretty good way to go. I've had the scope for several years and it isn't getting much use with its present target dot reticle. Any comments would be appreciated.

Doc <docs@fidnet.com>
The Ozark boonies, MO USA - Saturday, January 16, 1999 at 08:54:40 (EST) 


Mr Bullet
Movers are a pain. There are a couple of ways to handle them though.
Mechanical targets I don't know about. You would have to watch them a couple of times and time them to determine speed. People are a lot simpler as you can make a good estimation by the way they move.
Here is one technique. Either determine your rifles field of view at 1000m and divide that by range as a percentage, or use a mil ret. to measure the distance between two reference points at the range your target is going to be at. The further apart they are the better. Time the target a few times as it passes between them. Then break out the handy dandy $3.00 Walmart sniper calculator.

1. Distance between ref pts/time in seconds = distance per second
(I like to use meters. 1 mil=3.375 MOA, or use meters and mil)

2. [Distance per second X 3600] / (5280=mph) or (1000=kph)
(Now you have the tgt speed in mph or kph. Actually, this part is not required. But once you build lead charts for you and your rifle it aids in quick ref, and it is more dramatic to say "I shot a 7 mph runner" than "I shot a 12 fps mover."

3. Get a time of flight chart from a ballistics program for your particular load. Multiply time of flight to range by the speed of the target. This gives your required lead. Here is where working in metric pays off.
Lead in meters x 1000 / range to tgt = lead in mils
-OR-
[Lead in feet / 12] / [range in meters / 100] = lead in MOA

Here are some ToF values for a 173gn, 7.62mm bullet at 2600fps, sea level and 60 deg F, 78% RH:
100m .13 sec
150m .20 sec
200m .27 sec
250m .35 sec

At 100m, a 3mph walker requires about a 7 inch lead from desired POI, a slow walker is half that, a jogger double, and a track star triple. This data is based on trapping, and is very general. Since people percieve movement differently, and have different reflexes, these numbers get you into the ball park, but you have to refine your personal leads. The technique works, we used it to shoot 9 inch wide movers out to 400m.

I hope this made sense. Any questions, just shout.
Ed Engler <Ed_Engler@softhome.net>
CP Greaves, ROK - Saturday, January 16, 1999 at 11:52:25 (EST) 


I should add, that once you start to work either in metric or standard units, stick with them all the way through. If you switch up you will get garbage, and playing with conversion factors is a pain.
ED
- Saturday, January 16, 1999 at 11:54:36 (EST) 
This is a test message to validate the Roster in its new position. Hope all is well, and you all enjoy the ride.

Marius
Marius Ferreira <mferreira@lantic.co.za>
Pretoria, Gauteng, RSA - 


This to is a test! It is only a test! If it had been real - well not now!
Really folks we are doing this to help make a new,improved,better Sniper Country!
Thanks for your patience!

Sarge
Sarge <garryrn@dfn.com>
Area 51, NM, USA - 


RE: Lead on Moving Targets

...and there is always the other method:

Range in FEET X Target velocity (in FPS) divided by Muzzle Velocity in FPS equals LEAD in FEET. Of course, an adjustment would have to be employed for targets moving at an oblique angle.

In example: A target is moving at a 90 degree angle to you at 8 fps. He is 200 yards (600 feet)away and you are using Fed Premier 223 55 gr.

600 X 8=4800

4800/3250=1.47 ft (or, to make scope inputs easier .75 MOA)

This works great for the trapping method.

Later,

Bruce
Bruce Braxton <Braxton1@aol.com>
College Park P.D., GA, USA - 


I,m a sniper for the Oklahoma Highway Patrol Special Operations Team, I,m a 17 year State Trooper and a 12 year team member.
ricky manion <ricky@conok.com>
madill, ok, USA - Sunday, January 17, 1999 at 01:15:10 (GMT) 
For Gunny Hathcock's fans, he took the 1000 yard match at Camp Perry in 65 with a 300 mag, scoped bolt gun. The day before this he got a sliver metal for the National Match course with a M1 (30-06) also went distinguished with that match. In RVN he used a 30-06 on his first tour and a 308 on his secound.

For the Savage owners, shooters, lovers, there is a competion trigger sold by Sharp Shooter Supply. (419-695-3179) Don't know anything about it. Just saw the picture.

Yes sir reebob, the adjustments on the M3s do turn in the opposite direction of other Leupold scopes.

Pat M you still thinkin about coming out to Wyoming this fall?

Pat II
Lakin <nrdwr.plakin@state.ut.us>
north of area 51 N.M., UT, USA - Sunday, January 17, 1999 at 01:22:44 (GMT) 


to the person wanting to purchase a Chinese m-14 lookalike DONT DO IT . I made the mistake a couple of year ago, right out of the box the headspace was to deep. they give you some fired brass to show you it is ok but it anit! just remember you get what you pay for.Sprinfield has other info on why not to get the chinese m-14 hope this helps Craig
craig <dwendt@sonic.net>
santa rosa, ca, USA - Sunday, January 17, 1999 at 01:47:25 (GMT) 
Thought you all might be intrested. Gooch made it here late this evening with only minor setbacks (his Transmission blew five miles from me).

He's all tucked into bed after being awake for about 48 hrs. He says he only saw a few trolls during the trip.

I'm sure he will be in here by Monday to drop you a line. FYI, his e-mail address is up and running now. gooch@stormmountain.com

See you all at the Shot Show.
Rod Ryan <ryan@stormmountain.com>
Elk Garden, WV, USA - Sunday, January 17, 1999 at 02:30:42 (GMT) 


I'm new to the internet. I'm looking for chatt rooms the subject being military based, guns, malitia,sniper,ext. if anyone can give me info on these type chatt rooms you have my thanks.
Jared <paladen67@hotmail.com>
USA - Sunday, January 17, 1999 at 04:40:11 (GMT) 
Just curious if anyone has tried the Butler Creek Sunshields, as opposed to the Tenebraex killFlash ARD? Or preferably both. I'd like the good/bad/ugly on em if you could. My rifle will be arriving soon, as will the scope and just seeing which set I should get.

Thanks.

Tim
Tim <kevinallin@hotmail.com>
CA, USA - Sunday, January 17, 1999 at 06:16:40 (GMT) 


Sorry Craig, but ole MAXX is going to beg to differ with you on the quality and reliability of the Poly M1A's that were imported from China in the late 80's and early 90's. It appears that the golden boy's of the "gun magazine press" have managed to do a great job of bashing and trashing a weapon of proven quality and affordability.

We all need to remember that these gun writers earn their living writing "product review articles with puff" to please their advertisers.... while at the same time, they pretend to be World Renown Experts and guru's of ANY specific weapon..... ( the fact that these guru's may or may not have ever seen or touched said weapon until they began writing about it a few weeks ago for that months magazine is not important. ) Think, have you EVER seen a bad review of a new product that is released to the market by one of the gun magazine's major national advertisers?

In FACT most of these "gun scribes" will have accumulated only 3-4 hours of actual "trigger time" prior to writing these wonderful and BS filled weapon system reviews. (At some nice, clean, peaceful, shooting range.)

The fact is that when the Polytech M1A was first imported into the U.S., the "gunwriters" as usual, asked for a few of them for "samples". Problem was, the Executives at Polytech told them to get screwed. As Polytech Ind. is about nine (9) times larger than ALL of the remaining U.S. firearms manufacturing firms added together..... they don't need to give away "free or trial samples". (They have sold these same weapons by the hundreds of thousands around the globe.)

Well, on the other hand, Springfield Armory is somewhat famous for shipping neat and new stuff around liberally to the gun press ( for the free exposure and advertisement) and THEIR sales guy's shipped one of their Super Match grade weapons, 3 Gen II scopes, mounts, etc. by next day air to the writer that just by chance performed the "side by side" torture test of the Springfield Vs. Polytech a few years back. ( But, they didn't adjust the Poly's gas system OR remove the heavy coat of shipping grease that was THICK inside the stock.) It "boiled".
 

I wonder if the Editors and the financial guy's at Peterson and the other major gun publishing firms may perhaps be a little bit inclined to give "favorable" reviews for products that advertise heavily in their magazines?

AND then, these writer's in turn conducted a very biased, sloppy unscientific, dishonest, and downright unfair comparison test of the Springfield and Chinese Polytech versions of this time proven weapon. DO YOU THINK THEY MAY HAVE A FINANCIAL INTEREST!!!!!!
 

I have several M1A's, and I paid about (4 times the $650) list price of the Polytech Chinese version for some of them. However, I've yet to have a failure or problem with any of the four Poly Chinese M1A's that I've dealt with and USED EXTENSIVELY. These have all fired at least 1200 rounds each (some more), they have been used in HP matches, to teach several kid's to shoot at the range, several weeks each year deer and hog hunting in merciless conditions (hilltops and cypress swamps). To date I have had NO problems with a single weapon regarding accuracy,reliability, metallurgy, headspace tolerance, or any of the other BS issues that have been tossed around.
 

I may just be lucky, but after finding the right load, tapering the receiver lugs and bedding them, and just a little "minor" tweaking,
they will all shoot between ½" and ¾" at 100 yards ALL DAY LONG using Leuopold scopes. ( If I do my part....)

It's amazing that the myth of the Chinese "soft" metal receivers is still alive and espoused as a valid issue. With today's environment of pointless litigation concerning "product liability".... No company would have even considered releasing a product to the U.S. market if it was truly as unsafe and prone to failure as the Polytech M1A's receiver. If these receivers had in fact been as soft ( low Rockwell hardness rating ) as some folks would have us believe.....these Chinese M1A's would have been catastrophically failing all over the country, the press would have a field day, and a whole bunch of guy's would be running around with a glass eye or two, a mean bunch of scars and a very happy lawyer.

OK guy's, I agree...if you have $2,000 to spend on a semi auto version of a tactical weapon for use in the spotters role....buy a Springfield Supermatch with the Krieger Hbar and be proud. But the Chinese version will shoot with it all day long for a lot less cash.

Craig, you may have really had a headspace "event" with your specific
weapon, but I bet you my ass it was a gun dealer or his "in-house" gunsmith that told you it was "bad" and to get rid of that Import Poly. I wonder who has it now? chuckle. Hell, I buy American most of the time, but these particular weapons are too good to pass up.

In closing, since a lot of guy's work for a living and are required to buy most their own tactical gear, at times we are forced to make some hard decisions, but they CAN be educated decisions..... Just be sure that you don't allow the "sales and marketing guy's" in the firearms business blow smoke up your ass and mislead you into overlooking what may be one of the best bargains in the .308 semi-auto market.

It may be that a dedicated shooter could buy a nice Poly M1A, add a fiberglass match stock (and bed it), top it with a good solid billet steel scope mount and some quality glass.....AND still manage to be able to buy that Remington PSS the same year without the wife cutting him off.

My 2 cents.

Watch 6
MAXX

MAXX <redneck08@hotmail.com>
Near Blue Eye, Arkansas, USA - Sunday, January 17, 1999 at 10:24:44 (GMT) 


THREE ATTEMPTS TO POST AND ALL WIPED OUT
 

DUUUDDDDEEEEEs! MAKKEE FIXXXEEE.............
 

MAXX,

CAREFUL SLINGING THOSE INSULTS DUDE, i DID A T&E ON A ASIAN IMPORT AND WOULD NOT OWN ONE. Yours shoots better than anything I've ever tested with the exception of a H&K PSG-1. Guess you got lucky man.

heck thats better shooting than my 700 police DM, what ammo did you use I need some to enhance my palsied skills.

peteR out

UNDUDE, YES! YOU'RE THE MAN! SLING IS FEMALE TOPS (EDITED FOR VIEWERS BY WRITER) AND THEN SOME. BE IN TOUCH!
peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
BIG CITY, BY-GAWD, USA - Sunday, January 17, 1999 at 14:06:01 (GMT) 


Does anyone have a current e-mail address for the ATI sales folks? I went to their website but cannot reach them through their "talk to us" section.
Ed <Ed_Engler@softhome.net>
CP Greaves, ROK - Sunday, January 17, 1999 at 15:33:33 (GMT) 
On the Chinese M1A copy,
Check out this web page by Fulton Armory. They do a lot of work on them, and are pretty straightforward about their strengths and weeknesses. I've never had any work done by them, but I've heard they are a quality outfit quite often.

http://www.fulton-armory.com/M14S_Eval.htm

Jim <hampshire@mediacen.navy.mil>
Ft. Meade, MD, USA - Sunday, January 17, 1999 at 15:36:17 (GMT) 


All these little groups... 1/2" with a standard weight Polytech...
...5 shot, 3 inch groups at 800mtrs (877yds) with a norinco "Dragonov".

I must be buyin' the wrong rifles, or maybe I can't shoot fer' shit.

Hmmm... Skate-boarding??? Nah... I go watch "Sniper" and find out what I'm doing wrong.
 

Paul "Pablito" Coburn <condor@mags.net>
USA - Sunday, January 17, 1999 at 15:38:42 (GMT) 


I tried to post this once, but my POS computer dumped it...my apologies if it appears again....

On the Chinese M14's:

I have owned one since 1989, a "hybrid", Chinese parts on a *gasp* FedOrd reciever (sold by Century Arms). I bought it as I was a married E4 at the time, and did not have much money. I bought the best I could afford, which was about $500 worth. I later (4 years) had the rifle reworked by Smith Enterprises in AZ. They re-heat treated the reciever and bolt, checked the headspace, etc. That ran about $300, and was worth it.
Point is, I have about $800 in the rifle...they have been going for between $600-$800 at the gunshows I have been to lately. Why spend that, plus another $300 or so to make it "right", when you could just buy the M1A from Springfield?
I dont use mine as a precision rifle...as long as I can keep all the rounds in the "A" or "B" zone at 300+ meters, Im happy. Its a battle rifle, not an M21.

Just a thought.
Grenadier2 <grenadier2@earthlink.net>
FireBase Bandit, USA - Sunday, January 17, 1999 at 19:22:11 (GMT) 


To all our visitors.

I've got a number of emails already expressing concern about the move. Let me address those here, despite the fact that they are not all directly related to the Roster:

1. Duty Roster refreshes, removing details typed but not yet submitted.
- Solved - REFRESH command removed. Apologies for those inconvenienced by this.

2. Bookmarks.
- Please do not think you'll have to change you bookmarks. Once the move is complete, a visitors that last visited before the move started won't even know we've moved - ALL WILL BE AS IT WAS!

3. Why are we moving?
- a) to provide a better service: faster access, better access to ISP support if something happens;
- b) more space ( now we can really put up a lot! )

4. Events and Emporium:
- Those still exist on the new site. The boards that exist here at this site is still for testing only - I'll go there after sorting out the Roster to see whether somebody has already used them. Too late now, I'll move them across tomorrow night as well.

I hope that answers the questions you might have. If not, please feel free to mail me at any one of the addresses listed at the top.

And I hope that you, the visitors, experience the benefits, and that it is not only for us laying really far off. Torsten, how's it look from your end?

Marius
Marius Ferreira <mferreira@lantic.co.za>
Pretoria, Gauteng, RSA - Sunday, January 17, 1999 at 20:44:22 (GMT) 


Tim, Re: Sunshades

I have one of the honeycomb sunshades like what I believe you are refering to, but I don't use it any more. For my purpose, I don't like it. As a law enforcement officer I may be ask to work in low or artificial light and I have found that there is what I would call a signifigent loss of light transmitted through the scope (brightness) and in addition image sharpness is also deminished (fuzziness is increased). It might even be described as hazy. Some folks have told me that they don't see any difference when they use one, but that is not my impression. Try this, take one to the range and have a friend slide it into and bac out of place after you are focased on a grid type target at 100 yds. (or so, I use 200 yds.) and see what you think. Hope this answers your question.

Stay Safe!
 

Depity Dave <dprolls@access.mountain.net>
Nothing but MUD now that it is melting, West Virginia, USA - Sunday, January 17, 1999 at 22:23:23 (GMT) 


Yo folks,
Like Rod said, the recently rebuilt Tranny in my GMG Jimmy shit the bed not far from the Objective. BUT I MADE IT.

WOrse week Ive ever had. Ex wife split, said by to the kids, had the house packed up, drove to WV and blew a tranny. Someday this war is gonna end.

See ya'll later.

Gooch
gooch <gooch@stormmountain.com>
Elk Garden, WV, USA - Sunday, January 17, 1999 at 22:48:17 (GMT) 


Pablito; Just in case you don't know. You have to watch it Zillions and Jillions of time to get that information. It's subliminal I hear.
Grenadier;I believe you have indeed hit upon the main reason for the existance of the Polytech.
Go Marius!!! Sounds like some good moves to me!!
B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Sunday, January 17, 1999 at 23:05:55 (GMT) 
Maxx, Glad to here you like your chinese polytech so much. I did'nt have the store's gunsmith look at it ,i used a local one . As far as i know they said it was being sent back to the factroy .
craig <dwendt@sonic.net>
Sant Rosa, Ca, USA - Monday, January 18, 1999 at 01:00:29 (GMT) 
Pablito: Igues I'll have to get some some coffee, but thank you for opening up my eyes about the post by SL about the phone number for Mike. Some days its just damn hard to pull one's head out of their ass. Sometimes it just takes a harder tug!

Gooch: Hang on in there. Things have a way of getting better as I'm sure they will for you. Just concentrate on your two kids and never ever let them forget who their father is. They are your claim to fame. No one can ever take your place. You are DAD!

About the post about the group shot with the Dragunov at 800 meters measuring 3 inches. I can not comment if that is in fact true, but I have met some Russian soldiers from WW2 that have claimed exceptional accuracy with the old Moisin Nagant, so I have no reason to doubt the accuracy of the more modern Dragunov. I would just question the workmanship of anything which is produced in the old Soviet Union and the new Russia. Quality Control - Nyet!!

Al - Uncle Nunzio's nephew: Still going to the Sniper Sustainment course at the end of March?? If you are I'll be there with a couple of MGDs in my hand. Hope things are going well for you also. Wanna talk some - give me a call or I'll call sometime soon.

I have just received three boxes of the Hornady 178 grain bullets and have yet to load them up. I was wondering as to whether anyone out their has any pet loads for this bullet. I wa still thinking of using Varget but Has anyone tried out the Vit 550 powder with this bullets. All information is highly appreciated.

Darrell: How was skiing? And other extra curricular activities? Let me know - curious minds want to know - especially Andria!

Nobody is home this evening except Andria and myself. We have the house to ourselves. Fire in the fireplace and a chilled bottle of . . . Well, you guys figure it out!

al
Al Ostapowicz <aaostapowicz@worldnet.att.net>
Living here in Ignoramus-ville, Ohio, USA - Monday, January 18, 1999 at 03:49:47 (GMT) 


Ahh young "studs"(short for STUDENTS !).....very classic case of disinformation about the Poly-tech, not a bad weapon but as someone much older, wiser and experienced has pointed out- even Springfield Armory has sent out some DUDS !! Hook Boutin is quite qualified to give judgement on both ISSUED M-14's , SA's, or any others. Just ask him !! He is mentioned in a few of Peter Senich's books and Jeff A. has had work done by him...also he is very well known in the "community" around Ft Benning, with that said....Nope a Poly tech is not a match grade SA and a match grade SA isn't what you pay for it. Seems that more than a few SA M-1a's with mismilled receivers have gotten through QC. When you look through the barrel and run the checks all is cool BUT when you start shooting them and reloading to match specs, all HECK breaks loose !!! No such thing as a decent shot group and to repair the problem reqiures a NEW receiver and even then the new reciever may be misaligned. I had a Poly Tech a few years back and would still have it except that it was eating me out of the house on ammo consumption !!! Sure was fun and within its limits ACCURATE. I did have a problem with finding a decent/affordable mount for it...yeah yeah...they are available but when the @#$% mount costs ALMOST as much as the rifle?? So I settled for "ghost ringing" a NM rear sight and could keep my shots on target (C of M) IRON SIGHT out to 600 yds. Nope, no head shots or anything fancy but as a Spotters piece, no prob. ITS NOT THE GEAR - ITS THE INDIVIDUAL BEHIND THE TRIGGER !!

I would like to know if any of the EURO shooters have had the chance to work with the Walther 2000 ?? For that matter, everyone seems to be using the 168, 175, or 178 gr bullets for distance...what about 155 for close, UNDER 500 yds work and what loads ?? Am looking for DGA out to 500...I DON'T HAve to reach 1000 !!!! heh heh heh
OUT HERE
Will <willadams@mindspring.com>
Sweet Home, AL, USA - Monday, January 18, 1999 at 04:33:39 (GMT) 


GREETINGS
I AM NEW TO THE LONG RANGE GAME AND AM VERY EAGER TO LEARN ANY AND EVERYTHING RELEVENT.
THOUGH I AM NOT A SNIPER AND PROBABLY NEVER WILL BE THERE IS ALOT OF RELATED TECHNIQUES AND EQUIPMENT.
I HAVE TWO GUNS THAT I CONSIDER CANDIDATES AND I WOULD LIKE ANY (POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE) INFO OR COMMENTS ON THEM.
1. BROWNING A-BOLT VARMITER .308 W/SIMMONS 6-20 GOLD MEDALLION
2. REMINGTON SENDERO 7MM STW 6-24 WEAVER

THANKS
EAGER PUP <F_GNLVR@HOTMAIL.COM>
GRAND FORKS, B.C., CANADA - Monday, January 18, 1999 at 05:40:24 (GMT) 


SO MUCH FOR ONE SHOT ONE KILL.....MORE LIKE THREE SHOTS ONE KILL. SORRY ABOUT THE HAT TRICK FELLAS.....REALLY.....I MEAN WHO WANTS TO PISS OFF A BUNCH OF SNIPERS.

WON'T HAPPEN AGAIN
EAGER PUP <F_GNLVR@HOTMAIL.COM>
B.C., CANADA - Monday, January 18, 1999 at 07:21:01 (GMT) 


Pat,
On leading a target of unknown velocity: Figure out flight time for your bullet for the distance to target, then see how many mildots the target traverses during that time and lead by that amount. For 100 yards, the time might be too short to accurately judge (about .1 seconds for 168gn HPBT), so you might multiply it out. Eg: Measure travel for 1 second, then lead 1/10 that distance.
Grasshopper
Richmond, CA, USA - Monday, January 18, 1999 at 08:01:50 (GMT) 
is it possible to get a good trigger in an HK 91/G3? all of the articles I have read on this subject said that it starts to double and hammer follow before a good release is found. Also, what is the accuracy potential of this rifle, not the PSG, just a standard 91 with a decent trigger and other minimal mods (ideas for other mods???) thanks

Torsten, your paint chips should be there shortly.
Rich <dick2@clarkston.com>
WA, USA - Monday, January 18, 1999 at 08:07:28 (GMT) 


PUP: PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ALL IN CAPS. AS MARIUS SAID: "IT HURTS THE EYES AND IS HARD TO READ." PLUS IT MESSES WITH MY EPILEPSY ;)

Much nicer like this, no?

As far as caliber choice, I would go with .308 unless:
1) You are rich.
2) You are dead to recoil.
3) You like rebarreling your weapon.
4) You like spending lots of time rolling your own match grade.

Just my point of view though.
Ed <Ed_Engler@softhome.net>
CP Greaves, ROK - Monday, January 18, 1999 at 11:59:09 (GMT) 


Gooch,

You made it, Mister Dude! "Let the Games Begin"

Grasshopper, a most excellent post on scope leads, my man!

All,

Maybe we should all differentiate between a semi-auto MBR (main battle rifle), and a bolt action sniper rifle.
Yes, They are out there, but maybe the 'twain should never meet? Anybody know of one that was not a flop in the big picture of military issuance? How about ABSOLUTELY (sorry Marius) repeatable accuracy from 200- 700 meters for first shots?

Ergonomics, You decide?
Tactical advantages, You decide?
Additional weight, You decide?
Repairs, You decide?

I'm not talking "coddled" match tuned rifles that never see the battle fields and are bench shot, or handled in the pre-requisite shooting jacket only. Real World - Real Life!
Me, I love the Garand (especially the new quasi-tanker variants in .308), can stomach the M-1A rifles, and really like the FN-FAL and FNC's. but for the main intent of current shooting interests with (Hopefully) predictable first shots give me my Dinosaur Remington bolt action.

Who was it that said "Shoot and Shoot often"?

There I feel better!

Chao!

peteR
 

peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
ICE FOG CITY, bY-gAWd, USA - Monday, January 18, 1999 at 14:01:14 (GMT) 


Drugonov & Nogant;No contesto! Nogant by a mile. Not a good comparison. Apples and Oranges.
Gooch man; The best is yet to come... You get old, you get sick... and then you die. Life is like a box of choclates.... you never know just how much shit is in the box but you know there's another layer below this one. Get comfortable, settle in on the mountain and know your among friends!
B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Monday, January 18, 1999 at 15:09:08 (GMT) 
I enjoy your site. I have used some of the info and will continue to visit.
Mark Piles <skycop012@aol.com>
colorado, CO, USA - Monday, January 18, 1999 at 15:21:42 (GMT) 
Another sniper question here, this one about pistols. Not a which one (that is decided for some of us) but what should I do with it during the stalk? I don't like the idea of leaving it (seems like a blown stalk would be where you'd need it the most) but can't figure out where on my gear to put it. At the moment I'm using the issue M-12 holster, should I swap it out for a better one? And how many mags are recomended?

Thanks,

Jim <hampshire@mediacen.navy.mil>
Ft. Meade, MD, USA - Monday, January 18, 1999 at 15:42:20 (GMT) 


Question on scope shims:

I just put a Leupold Vari-X II 3-9 scope on my Ruger 10/22. With the elevation dialed all the way up, it still shoots 5" low at 25 yards. So I'm thinking of getting a shim for the front rings. Is there some formula that gunsmiths use to determine the proper shim height, or is it just trial and error?

Bach Melick <tmelick@monbar.com>
New Orleans, LA, USA - Monday, January 18, 1999 at 15:46:00 (GMT) 


RE: HK-91 Triggers..

Williams Specialties makes a set trigger setup for these.

Sorry, don't have the contact information for them anymore, nor have I used one.

They used to advertise in "Front Sight", the USPSA magazine, so if you know any of them speedy pistol shooters, they may have an old issue with the address.

Later,

Bruce
 

Bruce Braxton <braxton1@aol.com>
College Park P.D., GA, USA - Monday, January 18, 1999 at 15:52:38 (GMT) 


Maxx:
I agree with Craig about the Chinese M1As. I have never owned one but a few years ago while at the rahge one day the guy next to me had one. His accuracy was terrible but that was probably because he
was a pretty new shooter. Besides that however, the reciever felt a little loose in the stock, the gun jammed a few times, the bolt failed to lock back once in a while and occasionaly the magazine fell out of the gun under recoil. I picked up one of his empty cases that rolled down the bench by me and looked at it and saw that the primer was half way out of the pocket. We checked a few more of the empty cases and they were all like that.
You're absolutely right in what you said about the gunwriters but to me it looks like they were right this time. I don't know if this rifle was typical or not but I wouldn't chance it. I'm glad that yours perform so well.
Kodiak <rvl@inil.com>
USA - Monday, January 18, 1999 at 16:01:24 (GMT) 
Al... no sweat, the coffee is on me... I have about eight days like that, every week... "exceptional accuracy with the old Moisin Nagant..." Yes, they are very accurate for the time and ammo that was available... most would hold what would be marginaly acceptablt accuracy for todays "Sniper" rifles... The most amazing thing about them was that they would shoot that well, considering how UGLY they are! One of the shooters on my team, is an ex Russian Military Sniper, and is VERY GOOD, and his opinion of the Russian Dragonov, is un-printable... but he has a Finnish equivalent of the Dragonov, made by "Valmet"... very well made and very rare... it shoots 1.5" - 2.5" with "Match grade" ammo... the Dragonov family of rifles aren't very accurate, by our standards.
In purpose, their Dragonov was our M1C and M1D.

Eager Pup... Please don't write in ALL CAPS... I give some of us old timers an Excedren headache.

Rich... I had a three speed G3 (Stop, Fast, and Awful fast), and I found it fairly accurate for what it was, It was about as good as my Galil ARM .308... which is about 2" - 2.5" with 147gr machine gun ammo... never tried "match" ammo in the Galil... has anyone out had better groups w/match???
Pablito
Paul "Pablito" Coburn <condor@mags.net>
USA - Monday, January 18, 1999 at 16:13:01 (GMT) 


May be off the subject but watched the Seal Team Special on the Discovery channel last night. Paid particular interest to the weaponry. Makes me wish I had joined the service now, the Rookie with his hands on a 40 cal. grenade laucher! Look out deer!
Questions: Understand the MP5's but what's up with the use of the M14's? What do Seal Team snipers use?

Bolt <mbolt34547@aol.com>
USA - Monday, January 18, 1999 at 16:21:59 (GMT) 


Sorry about the multiple posts... but it ain'r My fault... I enter a post, see the page that says "Here's whay you said", and hit the flashing bar to go back to the roster, and POOF... no post! So I tried it again, same thing. I tried it a third time... this time watching the little light on the modem... no little lights! The server is not refrishing, and the computer is goint to memory (cashe?) to get the old version...
Are you reading this KEN... fix it, it IS broken.
Pablito
Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Monday, January 18, 1999 at 16:48:39 (GMT) 
Hey guys - I've been in contact with Talon to purchase a few boxes of Whitefeather .308 to try out. They advised me that they have gotten away from selling in quantities smaller than several cases. Does anyone know where I may purchase this ammo? Thanks.

Brent
Brent <koldbore@hotmail.com>
Shreveport, Louisiana, USA - Monday, January 18, 1999 at 17:02:51 (GMT) 


Okay - gang - time for a quick class on internet pathways.

Pablito: (and the rest) - if a pathway from your point along the way
via the internet to the other end (website, etc) pauses, goes dark, etc - Guess what - You will experience a pause as well.

For example, If we quickly look up over the berm from the 'Impact Area' - up range and spot where Pablito might be hiding:

1. Pablito comes from mags.net - so he will most likely be entering the internet somewhere very near that ip address....

2. nslookup mags.net
reveals:
Name: mags.net
Address: 209.140.80.6

3. Now, lets trace the pathway to where Pablito might be hiding:

traceroute 209.140.80.6

Tracing route to www.mags.net [209.140.80.6]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 219 ms 109 ms 78 ms 209.84.192.99
2 78 ms 94 ms 187 ms gw.doubled.com [209.84.192.1]
3 94 ms 171 ms 94 ms Loopback0.GW3.TCO1.Alter.Net
4 125 ms 218 ms 94 ms abovenet-tco-gw.customer.ALTER.NET
5 282 ms 125 ms 109 ms abovenet-155mbps-gw.vienna.good.net
6 125 ms 125 ms 500 ms vienna.hartford.good.net
7 109 ms 250 ms 109 ms mags2.hartford.good.net
8 907 ms 1703 ms 953 ms www.mags.net

4. The point here is that if there is a failure anywhere along this pathway during your session, surfing, posting to the roster, etc................ Now you know.

5. This happens throughout the day as anyone in those ISP locations performs maintenance, accidentally cuts a cable, etc.

6. 'Nuff said on that topic - I deal with this stuff every day - the roster is my escape from computes, networking, etc.....

7. Thanks gang,

Ken - from the Impact Area.
 

Impact Area <ken@aspire.net>
Nokesville, Va, USA - Monday, January 18, 1999 at 18:18:42 (GMT) 


Got it.....no more CAPS.

Ed: Thanks for your opinion and info.

Bach Melick: There is a formula...but for the life of me I can't remember exactly what it is. Something like .001" shim equals 1"@100yrds. I am sure someone here will know what it is. Had CAP of my scopes shimmed and it definetly made a difference. Too much shim can overly stress the scope. Also heard about a set of rings...Burris, I believe, that have oval inseerts in the rings that allow for both elevation and windage adjustments. Not as cheap as shims but cheaper than tapered mounts. Also heard of guys using pieces of tin foil or beer cans for shims.
 
 

Eager Pup <F_GNLVR@hotmail.com>
a balmy -2C, B.C., Canada - Monday, January 18, 1999 at 18:21:57 (GMT) 


Oehler Ballistic Explorer !

any of you sniperprofessors have any experiance with this program ?

"Ende"
torsten <lasercon@dialup.globe.de>
G3ermany - Monday, January 18, 1999 at 19:05:44 (GMT) 


kEN,

Will your trace thingy work to "Get Sarge"????????????????????????

Bach,
First, remove the scope and make sure its reticle is centered in the scope body.
I know HUH? By-Gawd Dude have you flipped?
Nope!
Place a 1/2 or 1" dot, (Pabilto's muzzle covers work great) on a normal sheet of paper. Put this at 25 or 50 yards downrange from you. Center the reticle on the paper n' dot and slowly rotate the scope body clockwise adjust windage and elevation until the reticle stays centered on the dot. You can use Vee blocks, or a piece of wood with a 1" hole bored and then split in two equal halves to hold scope.
It could be done with the rifle secured in a vise and scope ring tops removed in a pinch. BTDT many times
I once had a Spaz work associate that used to set up rifles for T&E's without centering reticles, and caused me more grief than you could possibly imagine.
Start with scope, then go to base n mounts, shim as a last resort.

Brent, If a local firearms dealer can't help then try Mike Markovcy at: MTS@ACCESS.WEBCOMBO.NET and tell him your dilemna on White Feather ammo.
peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
BIG CITY, STILL FOGGY, bY-gAwD, USA - Monday, January 18, 1999 at 19:10:10 (GMT) 


some month back one of you posted a SATELITÉ Photo page, Terra something ? I lost it and cant find it in the archive !

Help !
torsten <lasercon@dialup.globe.de>
G - Monday, January 18, 1999 at 19:55:28 (GMT) 


Ken,

thanks for the lesson, that should help some of us understand a bit better. Thanks also for the GREAT assistance you're providing.

All,
I think we should all give a big thank-you to Ken. When last did you see an ISP so involved in the issues relating to ANY site? Our previous server was Unix, this one is NT, so there's some stuff I don't know. I'm learning from Ken as we go along - all this will hopefully give us a better site after the teething problems have been sorted out.

Thanks for your continued support, and your understanding. Some things only come out when you really run the stuff. My limited tests were fine - but then I was only one doing them.

As I told somebody in private mail last night. If there is something wrong - BITCH TO ME ABOUT IT. Rather do that, tell me what is wrong. Then I know, and I can try and fix it. If you don't, and just leave, or accept it, how in tarnation am I going to know about it in the first place, and fix it? So, tell me. If it gets to be too much - I DO know where the DELETE button is on my keyboard... :-)

Pablito,
this message SHOULD come up with you favourite - ZULU! How's that look?

The multiple posts: don't worry about them for now. Whenever I see some I'll just remove them. I've also added a reminder at the top - use the RELOAD button before posting a second time. Hopefully Ken can help me as to how we can force a reload on the blinking link on the Thank-You page.

I wanted to do the Events and Emporium tonight, but I keep getting knocked off the old site. Even had to reboot so bad was the kick I got :-) My link from work is faster, so I'll attempt from there tomorrow.

Hang in there - we're advancing.

Marius
Marius Ferreira <mferreira@lantic.co.za>
Pretoria, Gauteng, RSA - Monday, January 18, 1999 at 20:32:14 (ZULU) 


Can anyone suggest a source for 34mm rings to fit the Steyr SSG? Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
G. Abbott <g_abbott@msn.com>
Houston, Texas, USA - Monday, January 18, 1999 at 21:02:53 (ZULU) 
Army snipers,Who are they the only real snipers are USMC mos 8541 You need to get some USMC SNIPERS to tell you how it really is,they train the BEST snipers there are!
RICH Wagner <N/A>
Attica, NY, USA - Monday, January 18, 1999 at 21:53:03 (ZULU) 
Jeez... not only did Ken bust my hide with one of them computer thingies... he went and told the whole world...
I'm movin' to area 51... move over Sarge... ain't nottin' sacred no more!

G. Abbot... for 34mm rings try EAW rings... imported by

New England Custom Gun Service
438 Willowbrook Rd.
RR2, Box 122W
West Lebanon, NH 03784
Ph. 1-603-469-3450

Pablito
 

Paul "Pablito" Coburn <condor@mags.net>
USA - Monday, January 18, 1999 at 21:57:17 (ZULU) 


HK does have a so called sniper trigger that works on the HK-91 and it is about 2 lbs but not too bad. Costs an arm and a leg. I have used several of them and although the cost is high it is such an improvement over the stock trigger it's worth every penny. (over $200)I belive.
B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Monday, January 18, 1999 at 22:32:54 (ZULU) 
RICH Wagner @ N/A :Rich Wagner, I'm typing this slow so you can understand and comprehend it!!!!...... Hmmmm, looking at your post, I can determine you are what we refer to in the "community" as a low brow (slow on the pick up) with very little punctuation or spelling skills, accompanied by a lack of respect for the "shooting-bretheren", whomever they may be.

Please come back when your grammer skills have improved, and your Interservice-Bashing attributes have lessened. We are all here to trade knowledge and lessons!!!! Not insults or Jabs!!!!!!!

Marrius: Apologies ahead of time for the personal attack on RW.
 

out, kudu

kudu <kudu3@aol.com>
USA - Monday, January 18, 1999 at 22:55:29 (ZULU) 


Lead Shooting:
This is something I am not very good at. Where is a guy supposed to practice this sort of thing? I know how to do the math, but actual shooting practice is something else.
Here is an idea that I wish some of you would-be inventors would build for me. I need a beeping timer that I can set to the exact time of flight variable from about .1 second to about 2 seconds with settings adjustable to one onehundredth of a second. Then all I have to do is set the beeper to the time of flight of the bullet to the target, stick the microphone in my ear, measure the movement of the target between beeps and VOALA, that is the lead correction I need. This should work on any speed target that you can keep in the field of view, and doesnt matter if the target is moving laterally or at an oblique angle. Someone tell me why this won't work.
Steve <nato@bright.net>
S.C.D.H., Ohio, USA - Monday, January 18, 1999 at 23:05:01 (ZULU) 
Gooch: WOW!! You blew a tranny?!!!! Oh the horror!!! Son, just because your are a F.A.G., doesnt mean you have to perform unatural acts on transvestites!!! I'm almost ashamed i called you my sniper buddy!! Oh my gawd, buddy is only a half of a word!!!! Does that mean you had a hidden agenda for me and you on the overnight stalk/hide during the Wilson Matches? Whats going to happen next?....girly things under your ghillie? .....or you coming to the range with a pastel/pink kinda poofy lookin rifle? Say it aint so, G.I. !!! Well, all i want to know is, if you are like this, does that mean your wife in West By Gawd Virginny is your niece or your observer? And, if she passes away, who gets her scope and underwear?... You or her Daughter(son)?
Well,I your still got your 6, albeit, just a bit farther is all. If you like, when the Love Goddess and I come to WVA, I can have her give you fashion tips on your ghillie, like what plant goes with what shade of camo face paint.

kudu out
kudu <kudu3@aol.com>
USA - Monday, January 18, 1999 at 23:13:33 (ZULU) 


Torsten,
Try this, www.terraserver.microsoft.com/terra
Or do a general search on the web, terraserver.

Pat II
P.L. <nrdwr.plakin@state.ut.us>
Whiterocks, UT, USA - Monday, January 18, 1999 at 23:39:06 (ZULU) 


Re: shimming scopes for more elevation

Bach and Eager,

The formula is simple, but hard to put into print. It goes like this: (inches of change needed ÷ 3600) Xs the distance between scope rings (C-T-C).

For instance:
Suppose you want to change the point of impact by 25 Min. of Angle (which is 26.179" at 100 yds). Divide 26.179" by 3600. This equals .0072 inches. Now multiply .0072 by the distance between the rings, we'll say 6 inches. This equals .0436". Therefore the shim thickness needed in this case is .0435". Now that we know just what is needed, the best way (in my opinion) to execute the deed is to put a very narrow shim in the lower third of the scope ring. This will help center the scope without binding it. Now put a dab (¼" ball) of epoxy on the shim and also into the front ring. Insert the scope (waxed) and press down lightly. Take it out the next day and clean up the overage. This will "bed" the scope and will solve several problems at one time. The scope will now fit the rings perfectly, and the rifle and scope will be unstressed.

Ron N.
Ron N. <rcn8@accnorwalk.com>
USA - Tuesday, January 19, 1999 at 00:09:48 (ZULU) 


Shiming scopes... Ron's sugestion is an excelent one, however if you wax bothe scope and the inside of the rings (with Pam, or carnuba wax), if you want to use the rings on something else... the epoxy "shells" will pop right out, giving you a new start.
 

Paul "Pablito" Coburn <condor@mags.net>
USA - Tuesday, January 19, 1999 at 00:30:59 (ZULU) 


Pablito: don't mean to bust your hide - but - thought well, since you got my attention, I thought I would use your direction to demo the traceroute. Wanted to point out to everyone that you can have a point of failure anywhere along the way.

PeteR: Sarge would pro'lly get pissed if the direction to his hide were traced.

Marius: Snipercountry is one of about 15 sites that I carry - but I like to hang out on this one.

Ken ;)
 
 

Impact Area <ken@aspire.net>
Nokesville, Va, USA - Tuesday, January 19, 1999 at 01:06:15 (ZULU) 


Purchased a new Springfield Armory M1A about fifteen years back and it came with an A.R.T. IV scope mount and rings. Is the mount worth using or should I go to something else? I find it hard to believe that one thumb screw is going to hold it solidly in place.
Doc <docs@fidnet.com>
The Ozark boonies, MO, USA - Tuesday, January 19, 1999 at 01:21:20 (ZULU) 
Hi Folks, was going to load some .308 and was wondering what the other reloaders on the list were using for the 168 gr Math bullet. ANy tips?

Thanks,

Justin
Justin <Just_it@hotmail.com>
CT, USA - Tuesday, January 19, 1999 at 01:36:39 (ZULU) 


Jim - I commonly use a shoulder holster during a stalk. This keeps the pistol on me where I will need it the most. Spend the money on a good rig as the comfort factor is important in this area.

Bach - Shimming a scope can be done but if it winds up requiring more than .020 you can actually bend the scope body. The Burris Signature rings with the Pos-Align offset rings can solve this problem. A .020 offset or shim will move the scope approx. 14 minutes of angle.

Good luck

Bruce Buell, NCDS

Bruce Buell <buellncds@mindspring.com>
Jax, FL, USA - Tuesday, January 19, 1999 at 02:02:12 (ZULU) 


Wanting to know if anyone has experience with the 7mm stw? Any info or pet loads would be appreciated.

Also curious if the most accurate load at 100yards will also be the most accurate beyond? If not, why?

.308 reloaders may want to try this load if you are looking for an inexpensive bullet. Hornady 190gr. btsp....Win.brass.....BR-2 primers
....40.0gr IMR 4895 **MAX. LOAD** It consistantly shoots under .5MOA aat 100 yards and has shot as small as .269"
 
 

Eager Pup <F_GNLVR@hotmail.com>
B.C., Canada - Tuesday, January 19, 1999 at 03:15:50 (ZULU) 


I have read several people say they clean their weapons with "Shooter's Choice" and 'Kroil.' I have kroil, but there are several different 'flavors' of Shooter's Choice. Which one do you use? Regular bore solvent, copper solvent, etc.?

Also, JB Bore Compound and it's variants, are also used. Do you scrub the bore with JB every time? or ocassionally, i.e. every x00 rds?

I scrub the bore with JB after each trip to the range, even if it is only for 30-40 rds. I am now wondering if I over clean. It seems to take 15 - 20 rds to 'settle in' the next time out.

I know this will thrill you 'one-holers,' but I shoot a Ruger M77 Mk II stainless that has been bedded and the barreled action frozen.

I most certainly appreciate any/all help/advice.

Larry
Sewerpiper <skporter@arn.net>
Sanford, Tx, USA - Tuesday, January 19, 1999 at 03:20:33 (ZULU) 


Happy Birthday, Robert E, Lee !!!!

Gone but not forgotten !!

This may not be Exactly "sniper related" but he did have CHARACTER !!

Out Here !!
Will <willadams@mindspring.com>
Sweet Home, Al, USA - Tuesday, January 19, 1999 at 03:46:03 (ZULU) 


Larry,
You said that your using JBs to clean eveytime you shoot and that it takes 15 to 20 rounds before the gun settles in. When I had my last 308 rebarreled with a Schneider SS barrel I had trouble with getting it to "Break in" and quit fouling. I called my smith and he said to use JBs and scrub it after each trip to the range but the problem continued. I finally called Mr Schneider and talked to him and he said to quit using the JBs because each time you do that the gun barrel needs to start the "Break in" process all over again. I followed his advise and in a short time the fouling quit. I then tried this on another rifle of mine to test his theory. I scrubbed it clean with JBs and then shot it and upon cleaning it I noticed heavier fouling for the first cleaning. After the initial cleaning it "Settled in" again and went back to the way it was. I think JBs is great and it should be used on "Dirty or heavy fouling but not on normal cleaning after each range session. Just my thoughts on this.

Pat L.
Hey Bud hows things out west?? You bet!! I plan on going back to Wyoming again in August. I hope to see you there too. I talked to Dave the other day and he said the dates will be the 6th, 7th, 8th of August. Should be a little cooler then(HA)

To All,
Thanks for the info on the lead of moving targets!! I guess it all comes down to practice but as someone stated, how do you practice it when you dont have a mover available.
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Tuesday, January 19, 1999 at 14:46:00 (ZULU) 


Pat,
For moving targets you might try old tires. I'm sure your local tire shop or service station would be happy to give you some. Tape a piece of paper to one side to cover the hole and then have one of your buddies roll them down a hill for you. If you don't have a suitable hill, you might try building a ramp.
Doc <docs@fidnet.com>
The Ozark boonies, MO, USA - Tuesday, January 19, 1999 at 14:58:03 (ZULU) 
to all interested in shooting moving targets. Jack Rabbits are movers! When you get so you can kill one running flat out with a sniper rifle you will be ready for target "movers". Just to be able to shoot smooth sliding target movers is of little value anyway except in a contest. If you don't have jack rabbits or coyotes go to a sporting clays range. It will help you with all moving targets. I know it is easier to just hold 6" ahead of a smooth target than it is to apply skeet shooting techniques to rifle shooting but it's the same operation and the same computer (brain) skills are required. It is the brain that needs to be trained. Not a target that needs to be computed. Please don't think it is some old geezer bragging, you can do it if you believe you can. It requires among other things different techniques in aquiring the target in the scope. eg. You must look at the target and place your scope between the eye and target without loosing position. Start with low powers first and finish with the highest power you have until you can look at a running animal/target and put the rifle to your shoulder or rest position and the target is Right there! Do not forsake shooting runners or movers from a rest. You need a rest if possible just like you do when shooting groups but you must learn to lead with your brain looking at leads as opposed to measurments (inches/feet).
If it's close and fast you may have to abandon your rest but don't unless you have to. You will miss a lot at first but keep at it.
Your surprise will be with your own success and confidence.
B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Tuesday, January 19, 1999 at 15:15:16 (ZULU) 
From what I gather, it would be better for me to shim the entire base, and not just one of the rings? Armament Technologies' tapered shims sounds just like the way to go. Once I get my scope back from Leupold, I'll check everything out again, and then mess with the base / rings if necessary.
Bach Melick <tmelick@monbar.com>
New Orleans, LA, USA - Tuesday, January 19, 1999 at 15:27:35 (ZULU) 
Bill R,

Sporting clays with a sniper rifle?, You Da Man! :-)
I agree the two best ways to learn leads are the clay pigeons sports (with a shotgun dudes!) or a running target type event like them thar fancy BB gunners do in the Olympics. Yee-Haa!

Doc, I like the "moving tire" concept, the "frame" would last a heck of a long time. A range I used to frequent had sections of fire hose to hang steel plates after spending BIG BUCKS for a years supply of chain.

Bach, A Rightous decision and good luck with re-mount on that "R.....", "Riu...", "Ruuu", "Ruuuge" (still can't say it!)rifle. ;-o

Sewerpiper Dude,
Cleanliness is next to Godliness, but we're the "Great Unwashed" here.
try Shooters Choice or Rem-Clean every fifty rounds, MRBULLET is right as usual! Too much is not a good thing.

Chao!

peteR
 

peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
SUN-CITY, bY-gAwD, USA - Tuesday, January 19, 1999 at 16:02:01 (ZULU) 


On a tactical rifle, such as the M40A1 or the M24 SWS, the scope rings (Leupold MK4 rings, for example) are usually torqued to 65 in-lbs. Are the hex head screws that clamp the scope rings together also torqued down? If so, what is the desired torque for those?

Bach Melick <tmelick@monbar.com>
New Orleans, LA, USA - Tuesday, January 19, 1999 at 16:02:32 (ZULU) 



Justin...
For the .308 and 168 match bullet... "Classic" powders for this combination are H-4895, IMR4895, IMR-4064, Varget, and AA-2520. 41.5gr to 42gr of either of 4895's are such a standard match load, I'm comfortable sending it over the web... it is not a max load, and will shoot through anything, including M14's and M21's... for the other's... go buy a loading book... when you take loading data over the web, you don't now the source.

Larry...
I agree with what Pat said...
... if you "Clean" with JB bore paste, you will "never" break in your barrel... each time you run paste through the barrel, you roughen it again... JB is an abrasive. If it's a 30 cal now... eventually you will wind up with a 31 cal.
JB Bore paste was designed to clean pistols and revolvers that had bad leading (from real lead!). What we are dealing with, is powder fouling, (easy to clean) and sometimes copper wash.
If you clean often... every 30-40 rounds, then all you need is a standard bore cleaner like Hoppe's #9, or some of the others that are similar. #9 (and the others) have a mild copper cleaner in them also... that's why the patches will come out green. It will remove the powder gook, and mild copper wash. You will never need anything stronger, "IF" you clean that often (after your bbl is polished from being broken in).

If you shoot a LOT between cleaning... like two-three day matches, where you shoot hundreds of rounds, and can't clean... you may find that a quick cleaning with #9 type cleaners isn't enough... you can tell if it's not enough because the last patches keep coming out with a trace of "GREEN"... you can wet the bore with cleaner and let it stay wet over night, and finish cleaning the next day.
If you really can't get the copper out, use a solvent like Hoppe's "Copper solvent"... let stand over night and that will clean the worst of them. Midway, and Sinclair, both sell chamber plugs (the same ones) that are like a steel cartridge with an "O" ring. Put the plug in, stand the rifle on it's butt, and fill the barrel with solvent... if it's really bad.

You don't want abrasives in the barrel... JB was never intented for what you're using it for... I wouldn't let the stuff in my house.
... my 2 cent's
Pablito
 
 
 
 

Paul "Pablito" Coburn <condor@mags.net>
USA - Tuesday, January 19, 1999 at 16:13:29 (ZULU) 


Bach Melick...
"Are the hex head screws that clamp the scope rings together also torqued down?"

Don't torque "Hex head" screws, they will strip... they are very soft. Replace them with "TORX"® screws, they will take 65 in-lbs... Leupold rings and bases come with the "TORX"® screws, and if you have your rings/bases from before they started using them, call Leupold, and they will send you a set of replacement screws. Put some "CLP" on the threads, or you won't be able to get them out in a few years.
 

Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Tuesday, January 19, 1999 at 16:26:07 (ZULU) 


Re: Cleaning with JB: I've found with my molly-coated bullets that cleaning with a copper solvent like Shooter's Choice will strip the molly from the barrel and move the point of aim for the first few shots until the bore is re-plated. Berger Bullets (where I get mine) recommends cleaning barrels with JB and Kroil when using molly bullets, and that's what I use. I admit I haven't carefully checked the cold-barrel zero since I started, but at the last match I scored 30-3X at 200 yards with the first three rounds out of the barrel, so it can't be too far off.

We've been kicking around the idea of starting the match at 1000 yards and working forwards, instead of the other way around, to make the cold-barrel zero a larger factor, but I'm not sure it will make much difference -- I don't think any of us can hit consistantly at 1000 yards anyway.
Grasshopper <wd6cmu@netcom.com>
Richmond, CA, USA - Tuesday, January 19, 1999 at 20:38:14 (ZULU) 


Pablito: I'm not sure I'd want the Teflon from CLP on my scope ring screws, they might work loose, or the stuff might migrate inbetween the rings and scope and allow it to rotate. You can get anti-seize compound that will keep metals from sticking together if that is a problem for you. I usually use blue Locktite on the screws and haven't had a problem getting them out again, maybe the adhesive prevents the parts from corroding.
Grasshopper <wd6cmu@netcom.com>
Richmond, CA, USA - Tuesday, January 19, 1999 at 20:53:28 (ZULU) 
I'd like some input from REAL snipers (LE or Mil) regarding the Tasco SS10X42 and SS10X42M sniper scopes. I've read good reviews about both (Here and in Tactical Shooter). I own two, but haven't yet gotten to use them much. Any real-world use and opinions thereof would be appreciated. Thanks.
Chopper <Chopper124@aol.com>
USA - Tuesday, January 19, 1999 at 22:18:24 (ZULU) 
HELP!!! can anyone help me locate M-118 "special ball" Lake City match ammo in 7.62 NATO? someone must know where to find this stuff, also a price estimate. And if avalilable a performance estimate, Ive heard its supposed to be sub 1 MOA, is this correct?
308 gunner <CGarr23113@aol.com>
USA - Tuesday, January 19, 1999 at 23:12:06 (ZULU) 
test
ed
USA - Tuesday, January 19, 1999 at 23:47:49 (ZULU) 
Chopper,

I'm not a REAL sniper but I have used the Tasco Tactical scope quite a lot from 50 to 1,000 yards. My scope is a 20X with rear focus.

Out of the box, I had two complaints with the scope. The W&E clicks were very muddy from the much oversize o-rings that the manufacturer placed under the knobs. The optics, while very good, were not what I was accustomed to from Leupold and B&L scopes. The muddy W&E knobs were removed,thinner o-rings added (and lubricated), and now the scope is very satisfactory.

For my use there was not life on the line, but there were dollars involved. I really gave the scope a wringing out. The rifle was zeroed at 500 yards. The scope was taken to the stop in every direction and back to zero. All four shots, when returned to zero, were exactly where they should have been. This was done a number of times. The next test was moving three minutes in each direction, firing a shot, and returning to zero. All shots being exactly where they should have been. Over the long term it will be interesting to see how this scope holds up, but it is mechanicly one of the finest I've seen.

This scope has not been subjected to immersion in water, but certainly has been used in the wet without problems.

For the dollar, I would say that it is a great value. My scope not only paid for itself in 100 shots, it paid for the whole rifle! What more can you ask for?
Bill Wylde <k9wxr@rr1.net>
Thawing - SE, Illinois, USA - Tuesday, January 19, 1999 at 23:56:18 (ZULU) 


OK we all know that things,action screws, bases, rings etc, etc need to be tightened properly with a INCH/POUND torque wrench. Now just answer one little itty, bitty question for poor old Sarge - WHERE CAN I FIND ONE!! Unless I'm getting TOO old I haven't seen one in Sinclairs, Midway etc, etc! How about everyday ordinary Sears?? Anyone ever seen one there??
Thanks guys!!!

Sarge
Sarge <garryrn@dfn.com>
Area 51, NM, USA - Wednesday, January 20, 1999 at 01:03:21 (ZULU) 


I thought this gun cleaning stuff has been beat to death, but I guess I was wrong. Since I have run out of things to say on my own, I will resort to robbing the works of others. I found this little thread at the GO VARMIT GO BBS and I hope the authors dont mind that I repeat it here.
I think we have to give up on our drill instructor fantasies of having a
squeaky clean rifle.There is no such thing as a rifle that is properly
lubricated that can pass the white glove test. There is an equilibrium
involved in cleaning the bore of a rifle. Too much copper and carbon
fouling will cause rust, corrosion, accuracy deteriation, and increased
chamber/bore pressures. Too vigorous an attack on the bore will likly
harm the rifling, or muzzle crown. How much copper should be removed for
you to say you've cleaned the rifle? The answer is not easy. You must
look inside yourself...into your Buddha Nature, letting your third eye
guide you...to know that 15 minutes, 1/2 hour, or more is enough to
remove the copper guilding that will cause rust, raise pressures, and
destroy accuracy. Oh, I know, I hear you say that copper is copper clean
that damn thing down to bare steel. I know many High Power DCM shooters
who refuse to strip the bore of all copper. Instead, they remove all
except a 'light dressing..or coating' of copper so as to not throw their
first shot off the mark. Oh I know that we are not supposed to use those
GI sectional cleaning rods...but how many of us have a few laying
around, 'just in case' Oh I know that we are not supposed to clean from
anything but the chamber end of a rifle...but how many of us don't have
the time, or can't clean from the chamber end. Oh I know that we are
supposed to clean the living hell out the bore...thats what Dad, or the
DI said...but how many do? I think that there is a point where most of
us look down the bore and say...'it's clean, lets get a beer' Endlessly
cleaning is needless, and potentially more harmfull than the copper.
That moment. The moment where you look down the bore, expecting it to be
as shiny as a US presidents morals. And you see a bore that is clean,
but not bare steel...shiny, but not a mirror. And you say,'yup it's
clean' you've had your moment of bore cleaning Zen. You have arrived at
the euilibrium. You and I know that bore is clean...even if it has a
copper smudge in it. Now, as for home recipes. I just tried grocery
store ammonia and had pretty damn good results! I cleaned out the bore
of a SVT and used the ammonia to negate corrosive ammo. I also found the
patches comming out blue...kind of reminded me of Hoppes Copper Solvent.
I brushed the hell out of the bore with Hoppes No9 and then more ammonia
and the copper was gone...go figure! I used a nylon brush.
Regards,
MJL

You want Zen? It doesn't come from a dirty gun. I can't sleep at night
if my guns are dirty. I can hear the crincle-crackle of carbon buildup
and the hiss of corrosion from the guns in my safe and I have to get up
and clean them before I can go back to sleep. I clean guns that haven't
been shot in months just because I know they haven't been cleaned
either. True Zen, I believe, is achieved through concentrated effort. I
don't chant like the Bhudist monks in their monastaries in Tibet, But I
can achieve a blissful trance-like state while spending an hour cleaning
the gas system on an AR-15 until I don't see any carbon any where.
Nirvana! Ok, maybe it is just the solvent fumes, I always forget to open
a window. Anyway, it works for me. Regards Alan K.

I am in agreement with the Zenlike balance-- the Yin and Yan of new oil
to lived-in function. I have also found that a truly nasty blackbore
will oft-times respond to a gentle cleaning with Brasso. There is less
abrasion to Brasso (and less chance of damage) than there is to a steel
bore-brush and it will clean all manner of gloop out of the bore. I use
the Brasso Heresy frequently on black-bores with healthy rifling.
Personally, I rather like the ''well-used train track'' shine to the
''knock-yer-eyes-out'' ain't-never-been-shot chromed super-nova look.
-kirbyTheOG
Steve <nato@bright.net>
S.C.D.H., Ohio, USA - Wednesday, January 20, 1999 at 01:20:32 (ZULU) 


NO! NO! not sniper rifles on the sporting clay field kiddies! You may scope your 870 and use it to practice shooting movers (clays) with a scope but no rifles at the local Sporting Clays patch! Don't try that at home either. That;s SHOTGUNS. THOSE SMOOTH BARREL THINGS. The rifles are for the rabbits! In the wide open spaces.

B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Wednesday, January 20, 1999 at 01:31:17 (ZULU) 


Anybody have map coordinates, or "terraserver" URL's on Groom Lake... (aka Area 51). Torsten "busted" Rod's hide today, with Sat photos... now were looking for bigger game... (Look out Sarge...), and I'm lookin' for a new hide!

Grasshopper... If you don't trust CLP on your mounts, then don't use it. It will not migrate anywhere, (unless you soak the gun in the stuff), and if you worked out the load in PSI on a 6-48 screw torqued to 65 in-lbs... it works out to some eleventy seven thousand PSI... Properly installed bases and rings DON"T "work" loose, whether you use hex or any other decent screw... if the are positioned so they can't move under load or recoil, they can't "work" their way loose.
However, there have been slews of rifles that have been ruined because the screws have broken off when removing a scope... a very expensive proposition... and Loctite is one of the main culprits.

Paul "Pablito" Coburn <condor@mags.net>
USA - Wednesday, January 20, 1999 at 01:36:15 (ZULU) 


Sarge,

Go to one of the industrial tool websites such as:
http://www.mscdirect.com/index2.htm

Order their 4000 page catalog (free), and then you can order online.

Ron N.

Ron N. <rcn8@accnorwalk.com>
USA - Wednesday, January 20, 1999 at 01:39:07 (ZULU) 


I agree with Old Dog on subject of argument over the "fancyness" of several rigs/guns/etc.
To a normal mortal shooter it might be a bright idea of spending the money needed for most expensive and lust after rifle to practise A LOT instead of getting a gun that makes mates envious but is not goin' to be shot much at all.

What I've read it appears that some of the most succesfull WW-II snipers did use somewhat "Plain Jane" guns and did well.

Here are the top three that I've read of:

1. Simo "white death" Häyhä, Finnish, 500+? kills, 7.62X54R, Finnish Mosin-Nagant variant, Iron sights !!!!!!

2. Nikolai Yakolevich Ilyin, Russian, 496 kills, 7.62X54R, Mosin Nagant.(most likely 91/30)

3. Erwin König, German, 400+? kills, 8mm Mauser (8X57 IS), several german sniper rifles.

How this is possible, I'd like to hear bein' explained by the dudes who have van loads of laser range detectors, fancy guns showing minimal wear and certain knowledge that 7.62X54R isn't any good beyond 150 yards and thus Dragunov is nill threat ;)

Hitting ipsc paper targets at 1/2 mile with Finnish TAK-m/85 sniper rifle based on MN action convinced me that things made possible by more sophisticated equipment are beyond my not so great abilities.

Off course it would be nice to have a Sako TRG-41 in .338LapuaMagnum but would I benefit from it's potential ? I don't think so.
So I rather spend me pennies on ammo, and pop away with my merry old shoota wich is a thing modified from ancient MN actioned UIT free rifle event gun.

This is an agenda that I feel many others that has to do other things than just practise all day long,like study or work, would benefit the most. IMHO.

Teuwo.
 

Teppo Uotinen <uotinen@lut.fi>
Wilmanstrand, Finnland - Wednesday, January 20, 1999 at 01:46:02 (ZULU) 


Sarge... 65 in-lbs "T" handled torque wrenches are available from Premier Reticles, for $65... and they torque in both directions.
The Leupold wrenches only tighten, you need another wrench to remove... and they are $130.
They use the standard 1/2" ratchet wrench socket stuff available from Sears, and every tool source in America... and adapters for 5/32" hex bolts on PSS's will fit also. I thought it might be a limited use tool, but now have hex bolts on all of my tac rifles... and two torque wrenches.
 

Pablito
USA - Wednesday, January 20, 1999 at 01:46:49 (ZULU) 


from the excelent instructions MWG provides with their rings:

The (4) small #8 screws on the top of the 30mm ring can be torqued to 20 inch pounds and the (4) small #6 screws on the top of the 1" ring can be torqued to 10 inch pounds. If the base uses four #6 screws they can be torqued to 15 inch pounds These inch pounds settings are not large numbers. Do not tighten any more then necessary as it could damage your scope. PLEASE CHECK YOUR TORQUE WRENCH TO MAKE SURE IT IS INCH POUNDS AND NOT FOOT POUNDS!

Only the large cross bolt that attaches the ring to the base should be torqued to 65 inch pounds.

www.shadow.net/~mwg
Rich <dick2@clarkston.com>
WA, USA - Wednesday, January 20, 1999 at 01:53:48 (ZULU) 


Sarge: In regards to the torque wrench you were asking about I just picked one up last week at Sears. For wrench and socket to fit allen screw on Rem. 700 it was $81.00. No lifetime guarantee though, only 90 days.
S. Barrier <Sbarr25@aol.com>
Chandler, OK., USA - Wednesday, January 20, 1999 at 01:54:06 (ZULU) 
Torsten: I have been using Ballistic explorer 5.5 for awhile, along with an Oehler 35p Chrono. I load my own rounds in a variety of calibers so it helps in organizing and keeping track of different bullets and velocities. It allows you a lot of flexibility for what if type of situations for altitude, temp and wind in chart and graphic form. It also calculates for G1-G7 coefficents. Overall I am pleased. The only thing that is lacking, and they may have changed since I started using my copy, is the data base is not that extensive for factory loads and I had some initial bugs with print and help routines when running with early releases of windows/nt. These bugs did'nt go away until running at least NT rel 4.0.
Tony Y
Iselin, NJ, USA - Wednesday, January 20, 1999 at 01:55:51 (ZULU) 
Thanks for all of the input. I guess I failed to mention I am using Sierra bullets I moly coat myself with a Midway vibrator.

I am going to severely cut back on my use of JB and stick with the good ole Military Bore cleaner followed by a dry patch or 2 and military gun oil.

Again, THANKS!

Larry
Sewerpiper <skporter@arn.net>
Sanford, Texas, USA - Wednesday, January 20, 1999 at 03:02:23 (ZULU) 


Sarge,
I know, I know. Every smoking barrel here at the Roster has told you where to find your torque wrench, so I want to add one more to the pile.
Check out AWC Tech. You can reach them in the "Hot Links" section here at this wonderful web-site, SNIPER COUNTRY!!!
It's the T-handle type pre-set at 65 inch-pounds and costs around $65.

Back to M1A/M14 rifles for a minute.
While shooting last time, I let a buddy shoot my S.A. M1A with cheap UMC ammo. While shooting it, there were times when it would slam-fire. This hasn't happend with match ammo, but it still bothers me that it has done it with other ammo.
Can someone give me the low-down on how to cure this problem?

Al O.
In the words of PeteR, the ski trip was a bogus wash-out due to rain during the warm spell, but the week-end ended in a most excellent way!
We're going to reschedule the ski trip. I've got details coming to you and your better half. What can I say, Al? I'm hooked!!!
D. West <westforce@juno.com>
USA - Wednesday, January 20, 1999 at 09:11:27 (ZULU) 


D.West...
My M21 slamfires with Fed F210M match primers... it's caused by the heavy weight of the firing pin hitting on its own speed.
CCI makes a hard military spec primer for this problem... one for the .223, and one for the.308... I think the number for .308 is CCI #34. Check with your dealer.
Pablito
USA - Wednesday, January 20, 1999 at 09:49:42 (ZULU) 
Pablito and D. West,

Are you confusing slamfires and doubling? They are two different things. If you had a real slamfire your rifle would almost certainly have been disabled. And most likely you would have been too. Sounds like you have trigger problems, i.e. hammer hooks, something along this line. This is called doubling.
Ron N.

Ron N. <rcn8@accnorwalk.com>
USA - Wednesday, January 20, 1999 at 12:28:28 (ZULU) 


MOVING TARGETS

I've been shooting moving target, olympic style and local events, for 20 years.

The best reticle for moving target in the field are lead dots or heavy horisontal bars. Lead should be calculated from what type of ammo you are shooting and the speed of a running man (full speed) at 90deg. (If you only plan to shoot at walking targets the leaddots should be adjusted accordingly. Remenber that most people shoot better with the target in front of the aimingpoint in the reticle.)

A .308 with 168gr bullet needs roughly 24moa distance between POI/centerline and leaddots/posts to hit a running man at 100, 200 or 300m. If he joggs or walks you just put the target somewhere between centerdot and leaddot/post.

The .308/168gr combination is arguably the worst round for running targets. The chanses of hitting increases out of proporson as the muzzlevelocity increases. The leaddotdistance for .308/150gr/2800fps is about 22moa. 125grNBT/3100fps and .223/55gr/3100fps are 20moa. The higher the MV gets the less guesswork you get. The real champions for longrange moving target are rounds like 22-250 or .300WM loaded with 150gr bullets at 3500fps.

The values are ofcourse not linjear(?) but a set of compromizes. Everything counts. MV's, MV-deviation, BC's, etc.

A variable scope, reticle in rear focal plane, with leaddots can be adjusted for diffenent moa-leads with the powersetting. 22moa at 8X is 24moa at 6X and 20moa at 10X, etc. The numbers are not correct but you get the picture. A scope with the reticle in the first(objective) focal plane will have constant lead whatever powersetting.

A top class international moving target shooter gets 1-1.5moa 15 shot groups in competition. And he starts with rifle at hip. Target crosses the range in 2.5 or 5 seconds. He can not raise his rifle before he can see the target. A new shooter needs 10-15000 rounds to get the basics right.

Shooting at moving targets should ALWAYS be done unsupported with LONG arm, shotgun-style.
 

TorF
Oslo, Norway - Wednesday, January 20, 1999 at 12:30:08 (ZULU) 


TEPPO,

I don't think many duty roster regulars would bash the Moisen- Nagant rifles they have established a most excellent reputation for their application in ITTAPDS (Individually Targeted Anti-Personnel Projectile Delivery Systems), Especially a UIT version, aren't they uh-tuned or blueprinted? The figures you give are World War II related right probably siege or city fighting, my euro-history is most poorly lacking?

Dragunov, uh-Ain't shot the "original", did the Chinese thang w "match ammo", rather have a "Rrr...", "Ruuuug","Ruuuggh" :-) in a dudely word "BOGUS!" Finnish Dragunov version; seen one, gnarly [most excellent} workmanship.

Like the most Finnish Dude says: It ain't what ya got dudes, its what you can do with it that counts" A MOST EXCELLENT REALITY CHECK

Sarge,
I got a Sears inch pounder #44593, never could stand the idea of spending a lot of money for a fixed tool that may not give a desired or found "sweet" setting. Tee handles jobs are good for the field pack though. Ron N's got the idea, "Lets Go Net-Surfin Now" DUUUUUUUDE.

Wheres the Gooch-Meister? Speak to us Most By-Gawdly one!
peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
Smokin' Barrel City, bY-gAwD, USA - Wednesday, January 20, 1999 at 12:31:40 (ZULU) 


On the use of JBs bore cleaner, I would like to make it clear that I was NOT referring to you guys who shoot moly bullets. I don't but plan on trying them in my 260 later on and from my understanding and research on moly bullets the best way to clean is with Kroil and JBs. It's my understanding that standard bore cleaners don't work well with moly bullets. I hope this will clear up any misunderstanding I may have caused. My post was in responce to copper bullets only.
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Wednesday, January 20, 1999 at 14:17:05 (ZULU) 
Greetings ppl. ! :)
The gun that I use to shoot was build for me greatgranfather for '47 National UIT/Olympic 300m(~333yds) free rifle championships(which he actually did win).
It basically has MN action but the bolt is from different unit and carefully fitted to the frame to make sure of the minimal headspace and trueness of the bolt face and locking lugs interface surfaces.

The barrel is VERY massive octagonal custom jobbie that has chamber shoulder and forcing cone set for use of Lapua D-166 bullet loaded
military (sponsorship) ammo that Aatto used to pop away with it.

Stock is allso UIT 300 compliant thang, barrel/action combination bedded in freefloating the barrel. Some bedding media is left to the stock's barrel groove and then honed away to tune the free resonating length and thru it's "natural frequency" the resonance of the barrel in order to achieve the optimum for the load shot (allways VKT/D166)
A bit like having a "once set" BOSS :)

I actually haven't bench tested the gun and allways shoot the same loads that it was build for with the exception that since D166 isn't available any more I need to shoot D46 bullets, I haven't tested the groupings due to total lack of interest in such, but the bullets seem to land pretty much where my shaky hands try to guide them.

Too bad that it doesn't meet rules nowadays due to overweight but yet again I am not that great a shooter so ... :)

I have no experience with chinese dragunov, only the 56S (normal ak-47 clone) wich was quite horrendous, while trying to fire it one could hear squeelsh and sqrueeks from the trigger mechanism...
The pull was so heavy that I allmost lost colour vision from mah left eye during it ;)
An easy cure is to dump all trigger components and change to Finnish RK62/76 assy.

As an adectode I'd like mention that '98 Finnish ipsc riffle championship was won with 56S. The main idea of the champ was to shoot with one untill it starts fall apart too much, screw off his excelent muzzle brake and the Finn-o trigger group ditch the junk and get a new one :) Seemed to work. Many of the others shot RK95s.

I hope my english doesn't bug the regulars, been exposed to fellow clubman an english chapper who left in horror when they banned shootas in there.(Okay his Finnish G/F might have got somethang to do with it :)

Heh never tried surfing but I suppose that elbow-down snowboard carves equal the thing lackin' the unfrozen water & the waves.

So lezz go grind our sleeves ! :)

PS: Has any one studied the effects of low temperature on gear ?
I've noticed that chill and dense air does allkindsa funny things on o-rings in scopes and affect muzzle velocity and projectile flight path even considering the lowered V(0). Since I'm a bit of fancy pants student I've been out shooting only at -32F but I presume that this reliability of equipment under enviromentall stress thing made for example this Häyhä chap to use iron sights. Considering that they didn't have a choice regarding the weather under which they went doin' their thing. Remaining in practise while enjoying -60F temperature seems to task optics and other fine mechanics quite a lot.

Mr.HäyhäDidn't take part in urban combat here can be found a some sorta brescription of the enviroment in whichlike most of the Russo-finn fighting tookplace:http://members.xoom.com/dstanton/Mosinpage.html
there should be a link "White death" despite the corny name it contains objective data of one battle and the conditions in general.

Yeps. Teuwo =;)
hmmm Micro$uck exploder seems to be tilting again so I must hit the submit button again even if riskin' eternal damnation due to double posting... If it takes place, sorry folks. wrote the above too long to loose it :)
 
 
 
 

Teppo,Uotinen <uotinen@lut,fi>
Wilmastrand, Finnland. - Wednesday, January 20, 1999 at 16:03:07 (ZULU) 


Just got the 1999 Leupold catalog and they have a new scope, the Vari-X III 3.5-10 M1LR. This is similar to the MKIV M1, with the larger 1/4-min. turrets. Has anyone tried this scope yet?

Bach Melick <tmelick@monbar.com>
New Orleans, LA, USA - Wednesday, January 20, 1999 at 16:07:29 (ZULU) 


Torf; Reading you post and mine on moving targets it would appear that we have conflicting views. I suspect that it not the case due to the fact that you are shooting at moving targets that one would expect to hit if stationary off hand most of the time. I respect your experience and what you say is agreeable except for the comment "ALWAYS". Let me say that if your shooting at a coyote from 400 yards away running flat out at 70 degrees if might be well to consider using the car hood. Or at least it would for me. However I do plead guilty to shooting shotgun style at ranges under 150 yards when given the opportunity due to the extreme angle spread and time required to cover it. Let me also say that I am possibly in a different warp zone when talking about jack rabbits and coyotes and that should be understood by all.
As a boy in the cotton field of Oklahoma I used a .22 rim fire and learned to shoot cotton bolls. (small marble sized pods about 1" or less in diameter)as I crossed the cotton field on the way to retrieve my milk cows for milking. I used .22 shorts when I could because the Long Rifles were harder to hit with. Maybe it's what you get used too but I think that there is a factor other than that. In using a .220 swift a few years ago I did observe that it seemed easier on longer running shots than the .223 I usually use. This is not argument is is just personal observations based on more than a box of shells fired.
B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Wednesday, January 20, 1999 at 16:29:48 (ZULU) 
Anybody have word on that Lake City M-118 Match ammo? (173gr) where can you get the stuff? How much does it cost? Someone out there must know, come on boys lets do some networking!
308 gunner
USA - Wednesday, January 20, 1999 at 17:44:18 (ZULU) 
Gunner; Since nobody else has and I have a minute. That ammo is kind of hard to find. Our Great White Father (and he has given the term new meaning)has ended the distribution of such things as surplus rifles and ammo to "Civies". I bought some match LC from a place called "Cheaper than Dirt" (on line cheaperthandirt.com I believe) that was advertised as refurbushed from ammo that was disassembled and reassembled to comply with Politics. I found it not particularly special in accuracy but the componenets were there. I disassembled it again and used the components to manufacture some "good stuff" after having fire formed the cases to my chamber with some old 150 grain ball bullets. Now I would not go so far as to suggest that a LE sniper who was restricted to factory ammo do something like that in order to taylor his load. No I would never do that! I never touched that woman! The Nurse is here with my medication now!
B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Wednesday, January 20, 1999 at 17:58:58 (ZULU) 
A question off the beaten sniper path...yes, I glanced at the archives, but could well have missed this thread, if there was one. My question is this, what do you like in the semi 308 gun? I am looking at Fal's, SR25's, et al. Any real world experience with heavy repeat shooting, sub 500 meter accuracy, targets of the live type but varing in size? thank you all..
 

Old Dog
Bruce <Bruce@mannlawfirm.com>
USA - Wednesday, January 20, 1999 at 17:59:51 (ZULU) 


Recently I contacted Gunsite to recieve more information on the Accuracy International AW rifle. But they told me that they did not import the rifle anymore and that it was being imported into a company in Tennessee. Does anyone else know how I may recieve anymore information on this rifle and who is importing it. Thanks alot.
Pickett <PHarris168@aol.com>
hills of, TN, USA - Wednesday, January 20, 1999 at 19:01:17 (ZULU) 
Hey gang! I love this site. I also wish people would get back onto shooting topics, though. I have a reloading question for you all. I have a Robar SR-60 I bought about two years ago. I have a Leupold Tactical Vari X 6.5x20 Law Enforcement scope with mil-dot reticule. I'm currently using Federal Match Grade Gold Medal ammo for it. I was wondering if anybody has reloaded any combinations they find more accurate at ranges of say 100-300 yards. Hey, if you have something great at longer ranges, add that too! Just looking to eek out the best accuracy possible. Thanks...

~Polaris
Jim S. <sr60@hotmail.com>
Pittsburgh, Pa, USA - Wednesday, January 20, 1999 at 20:54:58 (ZULU) 


Bach,

If you're talking about the Leupold Vari-X III 3.5-10 LRM3, take a look at the 'In Review' page here at SC. Scott Powers has a very good review of this scope posted there. It may be a little difficult to read due to the background pattern, but hang in there. It'll be worth it. In fact, it looks like I'm going to have to start saving my pesos.

George

George L. Derry <george@ebmud.com>
Oakland, CA, USA - Wednesday, January 20, 1999 at 20:55:10 (ZULU) 


This may be a say again, Greetings, I am trying to build a decent system on a Rem 700 ADL chambered in 30-06 ( Ive been following the debate 308 v. 30-06 my operational experiance was with the M21 system, we were not given a choice, and it did exactly what our instructors said it would do, range moa etc.) this being said and just for something to do...can any one recomend an AFFORDABLE barrel manufacturer. I just got one of Maj. Plaster's stocks from choate an it is totally high speed. I am satisfied with the craftsmanship and still cant get over the price!!! p.s. am I wasting my time with this action or is it possible, for a reasonable amount of funds, ie. less than bying a prefab system, to end up with a solid shooting weapon. Thank you for your time and comments
D. Terry <dbsan2hotmail.com>
USA - Wednesday, January 20, 1999 at 21:54:31 (ZULU) 
Now that my medication has taken effect I reviewed a rather vague post about some body with a name same as mine that did some work with some LC match ammo. I realized that was indeed 30-06 ammo involved as opposed to .308 as I take it you were inquiring about. I was a bit on the move when I did that one please forgive me. I did not inhale.
B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Wednesday, January 20, 1999 at 22:25:17 (ZULU) 
Nope, I was definitely inquiring about the new Leupold Vari-X III 3.5-10 LR M1. Yes, M1. Just wondering if they're available yet, and if the price would be the same as the LR M3 counterpart. Leupold now also offers new sunshades, Tenebraex filter, and other useful accessories for 1999.
Bach Melick <tmelick@monbar.com>
New Orleans, LA, USA - Wednesday, January 20, 1999 at 22:31:23 (ZULU) 
Hey guys,

What's the deal with elastic on the G-suits? I'm building one right now and I'm wondering where the stuff is supposed to go. I've read in a couple of books that "any good ghillie suit has lot's of elastic". It makes sense, but where is it to be applied and in what manner? secured to the netting?, in loops, straps, is it to be glued on?

Any input appreciated.
Casey <caseyb@scs.unr.edu>
Sagebrush, Nevada, USA - Wednesday, January 20, 1999 at 23:31:33 (ZULU) 


hEY Polaris Dude,

You're at the right place my man!

Way cool name, did you check Hot Links n Cold Tips? Someday it will probably again be updated with the wealth of data thats passed through over the last quarter.
At this point I think most of the regulars are too tired or too "medicated" to keep feeding the same stuff again, n' again, n'again .......................
Check daily and learn, many most excellent sniper and sharpshooting dudes hang here, as its the "in place" and nothing compares.

Chao for now!

peteR

peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
BIG CITY, bY-gAwD, USA - Thursday, January 21, 1999 at 00:13:06 (ZULU) 


Gunner,
I would not lose too much sleep fretting about a source for 7.62 Special ball a.k.a. (brown box) This stuff may be the worst shooting ammo ever loaded by a U.S. ammunition plant. I suspect that it is machine gun ammo, designed to give a wide cone of fire. Just about any other ammo one can buy has got to be better than this stuff for accuracy purposes.
Someone mentioned something about slam-fires or doubling with the M1A. A word to the wise, do not use match grade primers when loading for any semi-auto. They have thinner cups and are more sensitive. Especially Federal match. I use Winchester primers and have had no trouble. I have heard others recommend Remington 9 1/2. CCI makes a hard primer also. The forward inertia of the firing pin on an M1 or M1A can and does leave a slight mark on the primer even if the trigger is not pulled.
Steve <nato@bright.net>
S.C.D.H., Ohio, USA - Thursday, January 21, 1999 at 01:25:37 (ZULU) 
Thanks for the comments PeteR. I spent 3 years as a sniper in the service, but that was about 5 years ago. Now, I'm a normal everyday patrolman, with no swat teams in site for this junky. It is good to find a place where people actually know what they're talking about and can teach me some things, instead of braggarts and children claiming they've experienced things they haven't a clue about. Thanks for the comments man. Thanks again Mr. Rogers for the reloading info. I don't mind if you post info about reloading. I guess I'm not as strict of a professional law enforcement shooter as the rest. Thanks again gang.

~Polaris

Jim S. <sr60@hotmail.com>
Pittsburgh, Pa, USA - Thursday, January 21, 1999 at 01:49:25 (ZULU) 


BILL CLINTON!!! just kidding guys, but I got your atterntion didnt I? Now on a serious note, does anyone out there Know the performance expectations of M-118 special ball 173gr. ammo? Any help greatly appreciated.
308 gunner <CGarr23113@aol.com>
USA - Thursday, January 21, 1999 at 02:08:45 (ZULU) 
Yes Leupold is now making vari-x 3 3.5x10 LR M1. I just got e-mail from the folks at Premier Reticles. It's the exact same scope as the vari-x 3 3.5x10 LR M3 except has 1/4 moa turrets as found on the
Mark 4 M1. Prices are $621. with duplex and $681 with mil-dot. They expect their first shipment sometime in February.
S. Barrier <Sbarr25@aol.com>
Chandler, Ok., USA - Thursday, January 21, 1999 at 03:51:21 (ZULU) 
Ron N, Pablito,
Ok, doubling. It's firing two rounds off. I've checked the primers of ammo that it does this on and the firing pin is hitting.
Changing the primers of my match ammo now gives me two different loads to use between my M1A and my Rem. 700/ M24
This may not be a big deal to some, but to me it just doesn't cut it.
Anything like this ever happen with the AR-10?
Is there anything that can be done other than changing primers to stop this with my M1A?

The M1A is not going to be my primary rifle, that's the Rem. 700
but what I would like to have is a good, reliable "battle" rifle that is accurate enough to use as a spotter weapon, or a rapid medieum range "sniper" system.

One thing that I've tossed around some is the idea of dumping the M1A and picking up the AR-10. My M-14 mags could be configured to work it with the AR-10, but I haven't heard too much about how the AR-10 is compared to the old, M14-M21-M25-DMR rifle. Big key-word here is RELIABILITY. Accurate shooting out to 600 yards, but when the S##t hits the fan too close to home, it'll be able to throw some lead.
" A good SPOTTER RIFLE"

I know that some of you out there has got tons of knowledge about this very subject.
REMEMBER, if everyone here pitched in their two cents worth on the matter, we'd have a lot of...........BEER MONEY!!! or something like that;-)

Pete R. It would be "most-welcoming" to have you hook-up on this wave and surf on such matters, DUDE!!! This whole thing has me feeling "totally dismal"
 

D. West <westforce@juno.com>
Oh, so cold here in, IL., USA - Thursday, January 21, 1999 at 05:16:22 (ZULU) 


I hope I am right, didn't somebody not long ago post the formula for bullet stabalization vs twist rate? If so could it be posted again. I lost my copy and it doesn't seem to be in Hot Tips and Cold Shots. It probably should be, hint ,hint.

Sarge, what happened to the Roswell net address?
bills page <billmohr@borg.com>
Central, Ny, USA - Thursday, January 21, 1999 at 05:21:39 (ZULU) 


308 gunner,
Jeff Bartlett,SGN advertiser.has 173g.projectiles and LC match '06 brass, which are pulldowns.I've used these components, and Varget,to excellent result in my Garand.

JB
JB <bartran@montana.com>
MT, USA - Thursday, January 21, 1999 at 05:26:37 (ZULU) 


I have access to 173 gr Match "pulled' ammo and use the 173's alot. Much cheaper than 175 and I can't tell any difference in accuracy out to 500. I'm loading them in Norma brass and LC Match brass and I do moly the bullets. The "Specs" for M118 can be found in Plastered, uhh I mean Plasters book, "U...know what Sniper", almost always hard to say that with out grinning !! I can get the 173's in 1,000 bullet bulk. Email me if interested.

OUT HERE
Will <willadams@mindspring.com>
Still In, AL, USA - Thursday, January 21, 1999 at 06:27:48 (ZULU) 


Ron N...
"Are you confusing slamfires and doubling? They are two different things. If you had a real slamfire your rifle would almost certainly have been disabled. And most likely you would have been too."

Ron... slamfires are common in heavy auto weapons, if used with primers that have too thin a cup, and/or too sensistive a pellet... and slamfires DON'T result in the disabling of the weapon, or shooter.
Using Fed Match primers in my M21, if I removed a normaly cycled, but unfired round, there was a substantial "dent" in the primer. I switched to CCI #34 Mil-spec primers, and the slamfiring stopped.

As D. West says... "and the firing pin is hitting." This is slamfiring.

I have not found a noticable difference in the group sizes with Fed Match 210M's, and CCI #34's when used in the M21, and in Tactical bolt guns like the PSS's, M70's, etc. If I used the same load in both the bolt gun and M21, I'd use #34's in both, and make one standard load... but I shoot a different load in the M21, so only it gets the #34's.
 

Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Thursday, January 21, 1999 at 10:58:04 (ZULU) 


Jim S,
It will depend on your rifle but a good combination for the 168s is 45 to 46 grs of Varget this will be hotter than the match load but in most applications is deadly accurate. Another great load is 44grs of N-140. This load will be real close to the match load in velocity. I like the Varget for long range work because of the increase in velocity. Hope this helps.

D.Terry,
Your action should be fine to build a rifle off of,you may however want to consider making it a BDL so you can drop your rounds in case of a jam in the magazine. As far a barrels go I would not try to go cheap because you will get what you pay for!! The price for a top quality barrel is not that much more than the "Cheaper" barrels. A stainless is about the same as a crome moly when you figure you will have to pay to have it blued so go stainless. I would recommened Hart,Schneider, Shilen or Lilja there are a lot of good barrels but the important choice is the gunsmith. Find one who builds guns for a living not one who fixes guns and occasionally rebarrels a gun. Just my thought on this for what it's worth.
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Thursday, January 21, 1999 at 14:23:22 (ZULU) 


The formula for bullet stabilization vs. twist rate is called the Greenhill Formula. Someone else with their copy of Hatcher's Notebook handy will have to give the details.
Bach Melick <tmelick@monbar.com>
New Orleans, LA, USA - Thursday, January 21, 1999 at 15:18:07 (ZULU) 
Jeff A,
Shot the "Fat Barrel" 260 last night after initial break in. I tried Varget with 140s and 142s not to impressed yet, shot them both into .6s I tried one load of WMR and had 4 in .3 with a flyer so I'll try this load again. It seems to want to shoot but I haven't found the right combo yet but it's still early and I may need to start load testing at 200 or 300 yards. I have read where the long VLD type bullets won't always shoot real well at 100yds but will shoot better at the longer ranges, have you found this to be true?? What about it TorF any ideas??
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Thursday, January 21, 1999 at 17:22:34 (ZULU) 
Just started poking around at this site a few days ago, and it's very interesting. I'll freely admit I know _nothing_ about sniping or long range shooting, but I did want to throw my two cents in on one issue: torquing the scope base using CLP or some other lubricant. Based on my work with motorcycles, I believe that there are two types of torque measurements, "wet" and "dry". Most manufacturers provide "dry" torque values, i.e., sans lubrication. However, if you lubricate ("wet") the fasteners and torque to the "dry" settings, you can dramatically overtorque the fastener, potentially causing premature stress failure. I don't know how strong Leupold's screws are, but I know my scope base will be installed dry when it arrives next week.

Just something to think about.
Davin
USA - Thursday, January 21, 1999 at 23:34:54 (ZULU) 


As I have advertised in the Emporium I am looking for a barrel for a friend of mine. He is seeking a used stainless heavy contour or straight taper barrel to help keep the cost down on a varmint project. Bore should be .22 or 6mm and good shape. The chamber really doesn't matter because he will rechamber it anyway. He would prefer any of the following manufactures- Hart, Shilen, Lilja, LotharWalther, Krieger, ect. If you have a barrel or know someone who has on e-mail me or call the gunsmith directly. Goodliff Custom "Extreme Duty Rifles" (607)478-5151. He is open Tues. and Wed nights and Sat. afternoons. Ask for Greg. In this part of state he as good as it gets with out paying out the butt. duckman@eznet.net
Todd <duckman@eznet.net>
Andover, NY, USA - Friday, January 22, 1999 at 02:23:25 (ZULU) 
Slamfires/doubles: One option with a AR-10/SR-25 is that you can go to a titanium firing pin, which will reduce the possibility of a slamfire.
Grasshopper <wd6cmu@netcom.com>
Richmond, CA, USA - Friday, January 22, 1999 at 02:24:02 (ZULU) 
ATTENTION ON DECK! WARNING ORDERS HAVE ARRIVED!!!

I just got this from Rod Ryan of Storm Mountain Training Center.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Info on the 2nd Annual Carlos Hathcock Charity Sniper Competition has
been posted to the events board. Please check it out and enter this
event. All money that comes in goes right to the Gunny. He still needs our assistance.

We are currently registering shooters and info packets will go out
around May.

Rod

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

There you have it folks. You asked for it, you got it! Contact SMTC for details.
Scott <xring@voicenet.com>
USA - Friday, January 22, 1999 at 03:38:55 (ZULU) 


Greeting all from the land of fruits and anti gun nutz!!!

I have a ***WARNING*** for the group.

I was listening to the NPR (National public Radio) station. Heavy duty libs, but they carry the Impeachment Trial live and I happened to tune in a little early just in time to hear a Mr. Tom Diaz of the Violence Policy Center discussing the law suites his group is sponsoring against the firearms manufactures and doing the usual liberal whinning about high capacity handguns, semi-auto (so called) assault weapons and guess what else, (you get the cookie if you guessed right) "Sniper Rifles". Seems people are purchasing rifles capable of shooting long distances with accuracy. So, Tommy said that his Violence Policy Center don't like that and is going to begin going after the "Sniper" rifles for "Public Safety" reasons. Oh and I shouldn't forget to mention that he showed a great concern for the "Combat training centers" that are teaching people to shoot in combat situations. Seemed to be very upset about those training centers and doesn't think we should be learning those nasty little things.

Please forgive any speeling errors and bad grammar-I be Govnt taught.

I'll go back to lurking now. Thanks.
JimmyG <jimg@mlode.com>
California, USA - Friday, January 22, 1999 at 05:47:34 (ZULU) 


Pat:

Varget has performed the best for me in 260 with molyed Berger 140vld seated to just touch or approx 0.010" into lans. It did okay in 142 MK and did very well with 140 mk, but seating depth( 0.010" off lans) was significant for accuracy with the 140gr MKs. The 142 MKs seem to like N160 at 44.0 gr seated 0.010" off lans. So far I've settled on 38 or 39 gr Varget for the 140 vld and 44.0 N160 for 142 MK. The 140 does well w/ 38.0 gr Varget or 37.0 gr N135. I'm still not really satisfied w/ a load for the 140...yet.

Also, I have demonstrated it a number of times, as well as read it in a place or two, re: VLDs need at least 200 yd. to, I believe the phrase is "go to sleep", so I don't think 100yd is an accurate barometer to load test when working w/ Berger vld bullets. I'm pretty well convinced that 200yds (300 would be better) does allow the Bergers to show their stuff.

You mentioned you have worked w/ non-molyed bullets. Really, all of the testing I've done has been w/ molyed bullets.

Jeff A.
Jeff A. <d1k2l3@aol.com>
Smyrna, Ga, USA - Friday, January 22, 1999 at 05:50:26 (ZULU) 


Gooch, hows the country life going?

Titanium Firing pins. Don't do it an AR type weapon. One pierced primer and bye bye to pin. Pierced primers are common with this weapon and high presure handloads.

Sniper weapons are next on the list to be restricted. Look at Remington, PSS is no longer a listed item. If they get legislation passed they could restrict almost all weapons in the future. Not good Dudes.

Got Petes Tripod mount and like the thing. I will say that this is perfect for Urban L.E. work. Get one and you will be happy.

Well all for now. The UnDude.
Mike M. <DMMDNLN@AOL.COM>
Calif, USA - Friday, January 22, 1999 at 16:34:04 (ZULU) 


Davin... Leupold "Strongly recomends" that a good grade of gun oil be put on the screws, before installing, and "Strongly recomends" not using Loctite... you wanna' put 'em in dry... be my guest.
You wanna' argue it, call Leupold... they make the stuff, I don't!
This armchair crap keeps going 'round and 'round...

Does anybody on this site other than five or six guys, actually shoot Tactical rifles, and/or tactical matches, or is/was LE or Military???
This is sounding a hell of a lot like a benchrest/woodchuck/deer hunting/general reloading site, with a minor comment about Tac shooting once in a while!

Pablito
Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Friday, January 22, 1999 at 18:19:05 (ZULU) 


Hey Pab. Is 15 years a PD Sniper/Instructor goo enough to be here buddy. I also shoot High Power for fun, but live Sniper Rifles. You are right in too much bench shooting and not enough trigger time for some.
Mike M. <DMMDNLN@AOL.COM>
Calif, USA - Friday, January 22, 1999 at 19:21:09 (ZULU) 
Pablito,
The ones who have been around the block know your giving good advice. I dont mind different ideas on things once in a while and I enjoy Rons "Technical" views too but, as before, we get readers from all aspects of the shooting world. Hence they tend to only look at this through their own segment of it and forget that this is a sight dedicated to "Tactical Shooting" and the demands are much different. Tactical shooting puts rifles through things that I would have never, ever considered doing to a gun but if you want to play, you and your equipment had better be up for the task or you will be left sitting by the way side, so keep telling it like it is!!

TorF,
I lost the info you had told Jeff about on the 140 and 142 MK. I need to know how fast I will have to push them to keep the same ballistics cam as the 300WM on my M3LR. I know I can just use the MOAs, Scott, but since I am tailoring a load for the rifle, hey, why not(HA). Have you tried any of the faster burning powders with the heavier bullets??
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail>
USA - Friday, January 22, 1999 at 20:32:00 (ZULU) 


Questions:
1. Any opinions on US M19 Rangefinding Binoculars and what they are worth to purchase?
2. For the money, are MWG bases and rings adequate for SMTC activities (should I get the chance to go)? Will be installed on PSS if it ever gets here.
3. Would you wait and see the new 3.5-10 M1 before making the purchase of the current model?
Thanks, Bolt

PS: Still haven't received SMTC information!
Bolt <mbolt34547@aol.com>
USA - Friday, January 22, 1999 at 23:42:33 (ZULU) 


About VLD's and custom bullets in general. Guys VLD's are very sensitive to any change. Powder or O.A.L to name a few. They seldom do well in a magazine length loading. They offer better long range performance but are specialized. A sniper needs one round to do it all. Stope looking for a 1/4 minute less drift and spend time on the trigger. No one has ever one a N.M.title with a balistic chart and Carlos did very well without two or three different bullets to pack and track.

Pabilito is right in we need to get to basics. Does anyone know the difference between a Basic Sniper Class and an Advanced Sniper Class. PRACTICE PRACTICE PRACTICE thats it in a nut shell. Get to the range and feel the trigger. Bedding compounds, Molly Coats and Bore Coats be dammed, Trigger time is what we all need. That is how we learn to estimate range, read wind and hit what we aim at.

Back to my hide, making sniper slings that work instead of looking pretty. The UnDude Mike
Mike M. <DMMDNLN@AOL.COM>
Calif., USA - Saturday, January 23, 1999 at 03:06:25 (ZULU) 


Somebody ( Bill R.? ) asked for the Greenhill Formula. Look in the "Compendium of Terminology" under "G" and you will find it. I know the terminology is common knowledge for most of you, but look at it form time to time - I did not do all the work in compiling that for nothing :-)

HotTips? I will get to that again soon - but now I'm busy on other partsof the site, all of which will be revealed in the week.

Marius
Marius Ferreira <mferreira@lantic.co.za>
RSA - Saturday, January 23, 1999 at 13:11:57 (ZULU) 


Gentlemen:

My apologies for the double post. I shouldn't operate machinery when that tired.

Torsten and Steve(nato):

Millienium Year Application Software System. That's a hoot. I emailed you Steve.

Bolt:

You asked if MWG rings and bases were adequate. I have a set and I think they'll do fine. Very well made. Very strong. Now if I can just find a way to get to SMTC sometime this year.....

Mike:

You make slings? If you get the time, could you email me w/ some info.

Pat:

I saw your post to TorF. Just a minute ago I emailed you a post that he made last July re: M3 cams and 6.5mm bulletts. I saved it as Word97.doc back then; and copy/pasted in the email window and sent it to you. The formatting may be shot but the text ought to be intact. Hope this is what you were asking about.

Jeff A.
 
 

Jeff A. <d1k2l3@aol.com>
Smyrna, Ga, USA - Saturday, January 23, 1999 at 18:13:09 (ZULU) 


I was seriously considering the LR M3 after I read everyone's rave reviews on here. But now I will wait and see what the new LR M1 is like before I make a final decision. Besides, the M21 project is not done yet anyway.
Bach Melick <tmelick@monbar.com>
New Orleans, LA, USA - Saturday, January 23, 1999 at 20:18:20 (ZULU) 
May be time to survey the crowd about the possibility of working up some hats, coats, tshirts, etc. with the sniper country logo or theme. What do you think?
Bolt <mbolt34547@aol.com>
USA - Saturday, January 23, 1999 at 23:29:00 (ZULU) 
Bolt... I vote for that.
Left over money to go to Carlos Hathcock...

Pablito
Pablito
USA - Sunday, January 24, 1999 at 00:03:12 (ZULU) 


Bolt,
Great idea. Count me in.
Doc <docs@fidnet.com>
The Ozark boonies, MO, USA - Sunday, January 24, 1999 at 00:59:53 (ZULU) 
If the profits go to Carlos well I am in on the T-shirts.

For the one that asked about slings. I make two a nylon and a leather model sniper sling. Nylon is cheaper and will probably outlast us all. Nylon is $50.00 to anywhere in lower 48 states. I am waiting for new materials for next batch. I hope to sell them through Storm Mountain when done. Leather is a pain to make and if you have more money than you can stand $100.00 will get one, or I will sell you the parts to turn your M1903 sling into one. The slings are a quick connect/disconnect type cuff and secure carry sling. A few of you have them so far. If any of you are handy and want to make your own I will give info, but be warned if you don't have a machine you are looking at about three or four hours on a nylon model

The UnDude Mike
Mike M. <DMMDNLN@AOL.COM>
Calif., USA - Sunday, January 24, 1999 at 01:22:39 (ZULU) 


Marius, thanks for the tip. Had a couple of emails on the subject. Thanks fellas
bill <billmohr@borg.com>
central, ny, USA - Sunday, January 24, 1999 at 01:28:07 (ZULU) 
Bolt: I think the t-shirt, hat idea is a good one. I'd definitely like to have one!
S. Barrier <Sbarr25@aol.com>
USA - Sunday, January 24, 1999 at 01:43:52 (ZULU) 
Bolt, the MWG rings are great, they have tapered bases now as well. I have moaned about the Mark IV rings quite a bit in the past, but I have no complaints about the MWG rings, I even use them on my hunting rifles now. Call them up and talk about what you want to use the rings on, they are very down to earth with none of that "we are the best and we know it" crap you get from a certain scope manufacturer.

Pablito, yes indeed sir...

on the shirts, if someone here does that kind of thing great, if not there is a guy over at subguns.com that does shirts and I'm sure he would be willing to work something out. This is a great idea, alot of people won't send a $10 check but will buy a $30 shirt.
Rich <dick2@clatkston.com>
WA, USA - Sunday, January 24, 1999 at 02:09:51 (ZULU) 


All: Is there such a thing as a 'tactical flavored' gun show? I enjoy the gun shows that appear in the area - but am more interested in tactical shooting gear....
Ken in the Impact Area <ken@aspire.net>
Nokesvile, Va, USA - Sunday, January 24, 1999 at 02:57:49 (ZULU) 
Sarge looks out, identifies a "favored" subject and fires:

OK, as I told someone earlier, the first one that says "I told you so" rates a TAC NUC suppository!!
I got a used Remington 700VS in .308 today (Used?? not much!! bright clean, shiney bore). Yes the defender of Savage bought a Remington! After mounting my Tasco SS10x42 (standard Leupold one piece base and 30mm rings for now) took it to the range. A patch through the barrel came out CLEAN!! Ran a second patch - still clean! So using the same target load I've been using in the Savage proceeded to zero. 20 rounds later (don't know if that's good or not) it is zero'd at 50 then 100yds. Then got down to some "serious" shooting. New gun I'm not use to, trigger WAY LIGHTER than I'm use to, I start shooting some 5 shot groups I could cover with a quarter. Most of this was me as at least 3 of the 5 in each group could be covered with a dime! OK, OK I admit it I like this Remington!! Damn that was hard to say! BUT I will admit this is a FINE shooting weapon! Tomorrow I'm going back to the range and get in some quality time with this weapon - now how many 100's of target .308's did I have loaded??

Sarge disappears with his finger on the firing mechanism and waits!

Sarge <garryrn@dfn.com>
Area 51, NM, USA - Sunday, January 24, 1999 at 03:25:48 (ZULU) 


Hats, and T shirts w/ SC logo. Money to Carlos :
Yes.
Jeff A.
Jeff A. <d1k2l3@aol.com>
Smyrna, Ga, USA - Sunday, January 24, 1999 at 03:40:25 (ZULU) 
I don't do hats, but I'd go for a T-shirt, preferably with a pocket.

No, I ain't a sniper or an LE, but I was on diesel subs.

Dollars for Carlos...

Larry
Larry <skporter@arn.net>
Sanford, Tx, USA - Sunday, January 24, 1999 at 03:53:28 (ZULU) 


I want a SC shirt. Proceeds to Carlos, since he is the reason most of us are interested in this subject.

I bought my first AR15 today, a Colt flat top with 20" barrel. I bought a Simmons 3x9x40 and Tasco rings, I know this is barely adequate but the budget was blown on the rifle. I will put a decent scope on it when more money comes in.

I have no previous experience with thse rifles, any useful information would be helpful. I use Remington Bore Cleaner on my 700VS, can it be used on the AR or will it clog the gas port?

Thanks for the help.
Shooter <shooter@unix.tamu.edu>
College Station, Tx, USA - Sunday, January 24, 1999 at 06:03:58 (ZULU) 


Pablito; I believe you have the right idea there. Makes sense to me! Please publish a list of accepted subjects than can be politically correct here for us who tend to stray off on things like light weight rifles, pistols, reloading, bullets other than FMJ., targets with lines you can see, Calibers other than .308. rifles with fluted barrels, stainless anything, LAZER finders that don't burn any holes in the lamp shade, Politicians that are wrecking the country and about to take your sniper rifle away from everyone but those who are paid by SAM. Scopes or rifles or other objects whut designation model doesn't start with M-. Savage Rifles, Ruger Rifles, Winchester rifles under 20 lbs.,Mauser Rifles, Old rifles, automatic rifles, shotguns,peeing other than in one's own pants, binoculars as opposed to spotting scopes in funny colors, revolvers, Cleaning equipment from Walmart and target turrents with less than 1 minute clicks. Groups less than 15 rounds shot with guns that haven't been frozen to temperature on Pluto and weight less than 20 lbs with objectives less than 80 mm just to get you started.
Hum V's and flak jackets sounds like a good start! With occasional mention of tactical schools and arguments on who is the best instructor in the world seems fitting. Let's hear not from the tactically challenged for a time shall we? We could probably archive about once a year now! OH yes? Is Sarge hunting tactical? Exit!
B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Sunday, January 24, 1999 at 07:47:19 (ZULU) 
Pablito:

Tactical? Here's a site for you man. Check it out:

T.R.G.T.

It's looking pretty good.
 

Cory <ranger9@hotmail.com>
USA - Sunday, January 24, 1999 at 09:25:04 (ZULU) 


BOLTSTER,

A MOST EXCELLENT IDEA, bY-gAwD DUDE SAYS A MOST AWESOME YES!
BUT UH NO EXPLODING HEADS OH-TAY I'M A SENSITIVE STOMACH KINDA DUDE.

X-RING, IN. RE. IBID (LAST E-MAIL TRANSMISSION 10-2?)

JEFFY A.
Get the UN-DUDE SLING MAN, MOST TACTICALLY COOL, I'M Awaiting the Postal guy delivering my production version featuring "RICH CORYNTHIAN LEATHER TO MATCH THE SEATS OF my new Chrysler CORR-DOH-BAH!" ;-)

Ken, the Impact Dude,
Theres usually a L-E/Security show in balmer, md. each jan/feb I believe. I don't think shooters need a Passport/Visa to cross md. state lines but you may wish to check first!

'Lito

Chill dude, Breath in and out, in and out, ahh thats better!
 

peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
BIG-WET-CITY, bY-gAWd, USA - Sunday, January 24, 1999 at 12:09:34 (ZULU) 


B. Rogers. On your list.
 

Works for me dude...
Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Sunday, January 24, 1999 at 12:12:47 (ZULU) 


Bill,
Am I glad you got that off your chest. Now let me tell you what really pisses me off. It's when I log on the duty roster and there is nothing new to read! I would rather hear Pablito drone on and on about his Leupold and his non existant balistic cam problems and the fact that he thinks that he needs to zero the scope at 100 yards for it to work right, than nothing at all!!!!!
Steve <nato@bright.net>
S.C.D.H., Ohio, USA - Sunday, January 24, 1999 at 14:50:20 (ZULU) 
I smell a turd, oh that's B.Rogers
me <me @???>
USA - Sunday, January 24, 1999 at 15:40:14 (ZULU) 
Roswell Dude, Is it True?, A Remington Rig?

Like MOST EXCELLENT and the Dude did not even say "I told you So......!" I Like Nam Pla or Nuc Mam better than Tac-Nuc with my boardwalk fries! Better yet some fresh Habenero paste with butter sauted snow peas N' grilled possum medallions. Yummy!
Yep, now you can officially run with the Big Dawgs, no baling wire, Duct tape, Loc-Tite, Field carry kit of Marine Tex, or Outers Foul-Out between shot strings!

AND

Mr. Trace just notified he's officially called off "The "Sarge Hunt"
 

later,

peteR

peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
BIG CITY, bY-gAwD, USA - Sunday, January 24, 1999 at 15:45:59 (ZULU) 


I'm in LE as a special weapons officer (we don't call it SWAT, bad PR), and I've been reading this site for awhile, and I can make this comment about Pablito's "Drone" on the M3-LR.
I'd been shooting a Leupold MK4-M3 (old style) on a .308 PSS for several years, as a personal match rifle, and upgraded to a new M3-LR. I couldn't make it shoot even though I was using the 308 dial, like on the old MK4-M3. It wouldnt follow the BCD even close. Under other circumstances, sure, I might make a little piece of paper with corrections, and tape it to the side of the rifle, but under match condx, you hear your spotter say "Three-seven-five, pull two right", and by the time you have reached your BCD, the shooter next to you is already firing!
I complained to leupold, and got diddly squat for an answer. I was in the middle of a deal to sell the new scope at a loss and go back to the old one when I read his "drone". I bought some 175 MKs and loaded 45gr of varget, and the bullets follow the BCD like they're on railroad tracks. I can say that little one page "drone" about his (and my) non existant ballistic cam problems, saved me a couple hundred bucks i wouldve lost selling my M3-LR, but turned that scope into a joy. Paul and I have exchanged e-mail... and you might be well be reminded that Scott asked him to list that page, because Scott was also having the same "non existant ballistic cam problems". I'll bet several others saved some money and time on that boring "drone"

and as for "the fact that he thinks that he needs to zero the scope at 100 yards for it to work right."

Steve, it is clear to those on this site that know what a tactical scope is, that you don't. I doubt if you have ever handled one, I know you haven't ever shot one. In setting up a tactical scope, it is first zero'ed at 100 yards or meters, then the BCD cap is installed at "1", and then it is zero'ed at all ranges. You shoot at 600 yards, you set "6" andd you are zero'ed at 600 yards... you don't ever "hold over" and you don't "say your zeroed a 200 yards, at 400 you hold over 16.5 inches" like you said some time back.

I shot against Paul's team at the West Point Inch'on range last November, if you can call that raggity-ass'd bunch a team, and I invite you to come up and join us... I think you will learn something... and that Russian ex-sniper on his team, will clean your clock.
 

Longshadow <Longshadow@usa.net>
USA - Sunday, January 24, 1999 at 16:14:43 (ZULU) 


Sounds like someone has a "TACTICAL" chip on their shoulder !!!!

Pablito ?

Last time I checked.....there weren't any "Tactical/Snipers Only" policies on the Duty Roster !

It's a cryin' shame that you have to see comments here that aren't of interest to you.

Well I have news for you.....there's plenty of "Tactical" readers that don't want to read your comments on "getting anti-reflective coatings for glasses" or one of the many useless references to "coffee".

There's probably not one person on the Roster, who's every comment is of interest to everyone.

That's not the point !

There are many different opinions posted here ! Many years of shooting experience (Tactical or otherwise) !!!

That's what makes this forum so great ! That's why so many people can learn so much !

I'm not aware of a forum that has as many participants with the combined shooting knowledge that we have here on the Roster.

We all have to scroll through many entries to extract the ones we deem worthy !!!
 

I know ...that you don't want to claim that you are the "Premier Fountain of Tactical Knowledge on the Planet" !!! Because if you did ...you would probably get your nuts kicked off by someone who is !

Trust me ....there's plenty of "Lurkers" out there who have lots more "Tactical" experience/knowledge than ones who post comments on the Roster.
 

I'm not really trying to knock you, Pablito, or others who share your opinion.

But in the same breath.....don't condemn others for their comments ...'cause there are plenty of readers out their who don't want to hear yours !
 

I'd like to see some comments on this please !!!

Let me know if I am in the minority?

Thanks !
 
 
 

Rooster <kknjoey@webzone.net>
Broken Arrow, OK, USA - Sunday, January 24, 1999 at 18:27:41 (ZULU) 


On the issue of slam fires in AR 10 rifles. I have an AR-10, and the firing pin has a spring to prevent it hitting the primer until the hammer falls. It is not a free floating pin like the AR-15. I have not found a need to use any type of titanium pin in any rifle. An interesting note on them is an article in the PS annual a couple of years ago. Someone conducted a test and found out that standard deviations increased with the titanium pin. On the use of Fed 210M primers in semi autos, no gas leaking, no slam fires, no problems. That is with reasonable loads however. I try not to Hotrod it much.
Brian
Brian <N/A>
ME, USA - Sunday, January 24, 1999 at 18:50:46 (ZULU) 
On slamfires,I donno, it seems to me that if you keep your firing pin and bolt area clean and in good order you don't have rounds going off unwantedly on you.

That is not to say I am not paranoid of this happening to me. When I shoot my Chinese SKS that is notorius for someone getting killed by a slamfire sometime ago, I do three things.
1. I am fairly secure in the knowlage that its in working order and clean before the first shot.

2. With the SKS, at least maybe others, the bolt stays open after the last shot has cycled it. Making it easy to run my little finger across bolt face and check to see if the firing pin is stuck out or even crud on the face.

3. The one I use religiously is single feeding the fowler, Hey, allready stated I am paranoid about accidents at the range. With the bolt locked back its easy to single feed a top feeding semi.

I have never yet (knock on wood) had a slamfire with any semi. Not even the first M-16s (do probably to the fact of a thorough cleaning
after each session). You keep your equiptment in good shape and chances are it won't screw up on you.

By the way, this is a great subject considering I just plunked down my money two days ago on a Bushmaster. Paranoid remember. A couple of days after I got a Rem 700vs, In which I feel fortunate to have gotten a new one last fall after hearing what Sarge reported about dicontinuing, a great discousion happened on another board about a major problem with barrel trueness that turned out to be minor for some and not at all for others. BTW mine turned out very minor. It seems some duel dovetails show this problem with a scope more than other mounts.

Ps. Just a short "how ya doing Gooch"
Long winded today.
bill <billmohr@borg.com>
Central , Ny, USA - Sunday, January 24, 1999 at 20:42:46 (ZULU) 


Does anyone know where I can purchase 2000-3000 223/5.56 blanks?
Ding <ding@stev.net>
USA - Sunday, January 24, 1999 at 21:51:19 (ZULU) 
Count me in on the shirts, so long as you get some XXl's:) Money to Carlos is a great idea, and something many of us are doing on a regular basis anyhow. On a Carlos related note, corresponded recently with the head at WhiteFeather ammo, nice guy. Got some in today, and wondered whether Carlos got any thing from this ammo. Just wondering, with so much of the name useage and all.

Tactical shooting? I will post some tactical posts, soon as someone explains what the heck that means? Not to step on anyone, because that is not the way we should be, but, best shooters I have ever seen, bar none, are some of my hunting buds that work hours / days for a *maybe* shot, under conditions that most would think insane. Face the 2 or 3 speed gust winds in the mountains , for a moving shot....well, you know what I mean. In my humble opinion, the brotherhood encompasses far more people than just LE and target shots. Anyone that can put it on the money...that is a tactical shooter.

Take Care,

Old Dog
Old Dog <Bruce@mannlawfirm.com>
USA - Sunday, January 24, 1999 at 21:52:39 (ZULU) 


Longshadow,
Thanks for your comments, As I said in my earlier post anything is better than nothing.
To suggest that a tactical scope must be zeroed in at 100 yards or meters and then set to 1 on the dial is just about the silliest thing I ever read. I am still rolling on the floor over that one. Whats wrong with sighting it in at 200 and then setting the dial to 2 instead? or 600 and then setting the dial at 6? It all amounts to the same thing. And that is the only range you can be sure that the bdc dial is zeroed for. THAT DAY! What happens when the load you are using is 75 fps off of what you are supposed to be for the dial you are using? or the temperature is 50 degrees lower or higher than the than the Ideal 59F. or the 4th round out of the magazine has a little hickie on the nose and screws up the B.C. IF you are LEO as you say you are then you are stuck with the ammo provided and also it is impractical to keep switching barrels until you find one that puts out the exact muzzle vel. that is required. It is a fantasy world you live in to expect any BDC to be all thing to all people.
Also please point me to the time and place that I said hold over 16.5 for a 400 yard shot. I dont remember saying any such thing.
I am just a student of this sniping subject. I am here to learn. I am most interested in the stuff that I cant find in books. I already have all the books. Perhaps someday even you will have something useful for me to make a note of. Too bad that day was not today.
Steve <nato@bright.net>
S.C.D.H., Ohio, USA - Sunday, January 24, 1999 at 23:45:44 (ZULU) 
WHERE IS GOOCH?
Mike M.
USA - Monday, January 25, 1999 at 00:32:48 (ZULU) 
JEEZ,

More skirmishing in the ranks! Guys lighten up, save you ammo, money, and glandular induced energy for something productive, and show us that "Macho-Macho Man" stuff.

Like Uh,

At The Carlos Hathcock Charity Sniper Match.

Be There, or be most bogusly Square(and possibly suffer psychological / social stigma, be labeled for life, and miss what should be a totally gnarly time), Duudes and Dudettes I rest my case!

chao for now!

peteR
 
 
 

peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
BIG CITY, bY-gAwD, USA - Monday, January 25, 1999 at 00:38:45 (ZULU) 


Howdy to All:
I guess I'm what you would call a lurker here. I haven't posted on this page for over a year, but have been reading as time permits. I'm glad to see some of the familiar names still here, and sad to see some people are no longer here, but that is the way of things.

I'm no LOE or ex-military, but I have squeezed off a round or two here and there. okay, that is the end of the intro.

What I was wondering is this since I am on a budget: I have a Ruger (gasp!) M77 MKII in .300 WM. If I have been able to make this gun shoot .5 MOA bone stock with tailored loads, should I invest in a more "tactical" rifle, or shoot what I got? With all the trigger time I see on this roster, I can't think of a better place to ask.

I'm a competitive handgunner making the switch to long range rifle, so bear with me here. Also, if anyone has a handgun related question, please e-mail me and I woul be happy to help you out!

Powder dry,
Ralph
R. Horn <m1911@earthlink.net>
Houston, Texas, USA - Monday, January 25, 1999 at 02:12:49 (ZULU) 


Me?; Excuse me gentlemen, (Sorry for that "tactical" post men my old Navy (Naval) buddy is a turd expert and he likes to show it.)Gee's always trying to be the covert one! Up scope smart ass! Will he ever grow out of it? He watches Red October Zillion of times a day.OK back to insulting each other. OVER!
B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Monday, January 25, 1999 at 02:57:46 (ZULU) 
Listen guys. I am no extreme combat veteran. Only one kill in two war zones, and that was 8 years ago. I trained and trained like the rest of the so called tactical shooters. But now, I'm just an average street cop wanting to be in a tactical unit where they are not politically or liability correct. But it seems to me that there are folks here who are interested in learning what some of us have to share. Remember how hard it was to get into a sniper class in the service?? I think we need to lighten up on the non-tactiaclly experienced of the group and go back to sharing good, solid sniper knowledge. So, if anyone who is not LE or MIL has a question or comment, fire away!
Jim <sr60@hotmail.com>
Pittsburgh, Pa, USA - Monday, January 25, 1999 at 03:37:35 (ZULU) 
Ralph, I am LE but not tactical. In answer to your question, depends..
It depends on what you want and since your job does not depend on it you can choose. 1/2 MOA is about normal for a good factory rifle and good scope. But it don't mean it is good for sniper work especialy if its field work or even Benchrest work. It depends on what you want it to do for you. I've seen factory .308 Savages that will shoot a real good score at 200 and bad at 600 (IMO the stock on it). But if all you are going to shoot is 200 max it is good enough. IMO the M77 is a good rifle for its purposes and it sounds like it shoots well for you, maybe its all you need.
But is it all you want?! Remember, ye who dies with the most toys wins.
Sarge, hows the VS?

bill <billmohr@borg.com>
Central, Ny, USA - Monday, January 25, 1999 at 04:02:36 (ZULU) 


Jeff A,
Thanks for the 260 data!! Now if it would just quit snowing so I could do some more load testing.
Bill R,
Who's calling you a "Turd" ?? Is there something you want to share with the rest of us?? Here we all thought you were so mild and even tempered(HA)

To All,
I think Pablito was only trying to keep us on track with what the sight is really all about. Sometimes we" DO"get a little far afield. I don't
want to see us lose any more of our readers, we already lost Russ and as Scott said we can disagree without getting personal . Al said it best about opinions, so lets all agree to be able to disagree. It shouldn't make any difference what aspect of the shooting world we come from we all share the love of shooting. There is a lot of knowlege among the group and we should feel free to be able to ask a question about any and all aspects of shooting. Just my opinion.

Steve,
On Zeroing the scope at 100yds I think they were talking only about the 3.5x10 LR M3. When it is zeroed that way, in theory ,it is on at any number you then dial it to. If it is not zeroed at 100yds first then all the other dials will be off as well. The scope is designed with a stop so it will always come back to the "1" which is the 100 yd zero. If as you say conditions are bad or different then if you were shooting at 600yds you might dial to "6" and add a click or deduct one. It is designed for tactical long range shooting where you only need to go one rev. to reach 1000yds and this way you dont lose track of how many times you have turned the dial. Its quick and fool proof.
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Monday, January 25, 1999 at 05:33:28 (ZULU) 


Naw Pat it's just an old haint from a past life! He's eve's dropping and saw I was spreading hate and discontent and thought I was distracted. He's just having fun.He dreamt that he was on a Nuke sub( pronounced "nookiesub") and conjures up that he was picking up a spy on the Ice pack you know how you get real life mixed up with movies and things. Just a couple of old hippies that did inhale I guess. Ice Station Zebra or something like that wasn't it?
JUST wanted to relieve the tension here a bit! Stirred up the Condor's nest a little I don't want him to get too much larger than life. Worst thing that can happen to elite troops is they get to believing their own advertising and forget their flak jackets. Ole Pab knows his stuff. I don't want to turn this into a reloading forum either. Actually I try to help some of the question posters off line but there is a lot of parallax involved in looking at tactical rifles without custom loads. I know they need real good guns if your gonna shoot factory stuff. This idea that bullets gotta come out of a factory loaded already in the cases is bad ju ju! If you go to court the opposing lawyer is gonna attack you and your department on something. Better to waste his time on something like that in my opinion. Every agency has it's rules and understandably so but as a shooter you might do well to walk the walk and talk the talk. I really would like to see more tactics on this channel. But I'd like to see somebody start a discussion rather than complain cause one ain't going. Filling the archives with good tactics would be real fine but when the subject comes up we always seem to shortly hear that it's classified or something to that affect and it kind of gets over shadowed with something else. But like it or not all the books say that Hunters may not be snipers but snipers better be hunters. I think if you believe yourself to be a Urban Cowboy that don't need that ropin and riddin stuff you may be missing some skills that would save your posterior parts should the need happen up. I know I didn't know much about cowboyin till I got on a horse.

B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Monday, January 25, 1999 at 06:50:40 (ZULU) 


This site is such a great resource--I've been dropping in here for quite a while--thanks to everyone who helps to make it what it is.

Just wanted to de-lurk and let you guys know about a sniper personal essay I really like. It was published in print a while back by the literary magazine I'm an intern with. Anyway, now it's on the web and free--if you have time you might check it out. It's about a Gulf War sniper and it's very well written.

Here's the address:
http://missourireview.org/essays/
Grail <htngo@unforgettable.com>
Columbia, MO, USA - Monday, January 25, 1999 at 08:08:45 (ZULU) 


Grail:

I read the "Storekeeper" with special interest since he was using the M88 Mc Millan which I am very used to. My first Impression was, Hmmm good story with no BS in it.
But the writer must not be the operator or he would not have made that many technical mistakes which give the story no more spice than if he had described the actual handling of the gear involved.

I´m not going to list the bubu´s, take a look and find them yourself. (there may be a lot more that I did´t find ?)

But,
the end and the overall message is well worth the reading, especially since it is not the message that is usually carried across when it comes to your US of A military.

My respect to all of you that have "been there, done that". And even though I train for it I hope I never have to actually do it.

"Ende"

Torsten <lasercon@dialup.globe.de>
G3ermany - Monday, January 25, 1999 at 11:54:38 (ZULU) 


Hey Guys,
I am going to be breaking in my first new rifle (700pss). I have seen you guys discuss what solvents to use while breaking in a rifle, but I have no idea how often I should clean the barrel during break - in,
after every round, every three rounds etc. If anyone could give me some insight it would be much appreciated!!!
James Castago
USA - Monday, January 25, 1999 at 14:39:32 (ZULU) 
James,
On factory barrels I clean it with Hoppes and Sweets 7.62 until there is no copper or blue on the patch. I then scrub it with JBs and then once its good and clean start breaking it in. I shoot one round and clean it with shooters choice for the first 10rds then every 3 for the next 30 and then every 5 for the next 50. Others do it different but this has made for some very nice cleaning barrels for me. They say the first 10 rounds down the barrel are the most important. I then try to clean every 20 to 30 rounds after my gun is broke in. Hope this helps, just my opinion for what its worth.
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Monday, January 25, 1999 at 15:16:48 (ZULU) 
Hey Ralph (with the Ruuu, Ruug, Ruuuggee),

If "It" shoots that good, and does so consistently to your maximum extreme range of engagement you may be content. In a nutshell, shoot the heck out of it, get good, and be happy with the rifle and just work to improve your skills.

PS anybody got an web address for Tyler Mfg. They make them little aluminum grip adapters for Smith "K" frames and I need a couple.

Torsten & Torf,

about a month ago I asked for info on Lapua Forex (fourex?) ammo can anybody help me, HELP!, HELP!, HELP!

CHAO FOR NOW!
 

peteR
peteR <pngreiff@aol.com>
Big City, bY-gAwD, USA - Monday, January 25, 1999 at 16:37:53 (ZULU) 


Hey guys, been a while so I thought I'd leave the hide finally and... What's that? The FTX has been over for 6 weeks? Damn...

Anyhow I was on vacation, then busy, then sick, now I'm sick and busy! I have a month's worth of Duty Roster postings to read, so I don't know when I'll be able to completely catch up.

Mike Lau says still another month or so before my rifle is ready. Ran into a guy at the range that has a TBA rifle on order too, should be fun to compare as his is due not long after mine.

Anyhow, a very belated "Happy New year!" to everyone, and congrats to Bruce for Mil-Dot Master making an appearance in the current issue of SOF. I'll try to be back on sometime soon.

"Will shoot for cough drops"

Dave <dave@broadsword.com>
San Jose, CA, USA - Monday, January 25, 1999 at 21:49:52 (ZULU) 


What's a "tactical shooter"? To my way of thinking, someone who can take his rifle and, in any conditions, at any distance within his range, can put his first round on the target is a tactical shooter in my book. Whether he does this to put meat on the table, take high score in a match, or take out a criminal or enemy officer makes no difference to me. A "sniper" is a hunter of men -- a tactical shooter plus a lot more (most of which I have only a vague idea of).

You guys know the match I shoot if you've read my article. We try to achieve the goal above. I wish we could practice up/down-hill shots and moving targets or work some more on range estimation, but we just don't have the facilities. Not everyone has a few hundred acres of wooded hillside to bang away on like our Uncle Sam or a few other lucky individuals and groups.

I've read more than a couple of LEOs and military guys on here who come across as looking down on anyone who doesn't do tactical shooting as part of some public duty. Frankly I think you guys should stop comparing fish stories and get down to the range with the rest of us. In the year I've been shooting our match, only one duty-slotted sniper has ever showed up, and he was a big disapointment. He was with an Army Ranger unit and had seen action in Somalia and Bosnia and came to the match with a $5K custom rifle. I don't think he ever got out of last place in the three matches in a row he shot. I sure hope he isn't typical, I'd like to think my tax dollars buys more quality than that.

Any of you "pros" want to come down and kick our ass, I will personally pay your gas to drive down and show us how it's done. Maybe you are as good as you say you are, but as long as there is this reluctance to mingle, the rest of us civvies are going to wonder how much of what you say is real.

May your zero stay true and the winds heed your call.
Grasshopper <wd6cmu@netcom.com>
Richmond, CA, USA - Monday, January 25, 1999 at 23:19:35 (ZULU) 


Grasshopper, Don't know who you are refering to but, I will take you up on your offer. You may kick the crap out of me, either way it should be fun.

I never have been much of a competition shooter, just a lowly Sniper. I have a feeling you may hear from some of my students too. When is the match and where is it. Mind if I bring some other lowly Snipers with me.

Rod Ryan <ryan@stormmountain.com>
Elk Garden, WV, USA - Tuesday, January 26, 1999 at 03:02:32 (ZULU) 


Grasshopper, Almost forgot, since you will be paying for my gas to make it out to CA. I would like to offer you a free (read Free) Basic and Advanced Sniper Course during June of this year. The dates are June 7-11 and 14-18. You get the middle weekend off to rest. Hope you can make the above dates.

Also, where is his article you wrote? I would like to find out about the match.
Rod Ryan <ryan@stormmountain.com>
Elk Garden, WV, USA - Tuesday, January 26, 1999 at 03:15:41 (ZULU) 


Rod, got the info you mailed the other day about the June courses. Thanks. Couple of meat getters and I are trying to shake loose to come out. Any chance of just doing the advanced course? e-mail me please.

Tactical is an interesting place, I guess. I appreciate anyone that can shoot because no one is born able. Lost a hunting trip to a guy several years back. Shot me to pieces on paper. Truly amazing. We later teased him that if we could only make game stand still, he could also feed us. haha He took it exactly as he should, with a FYOU and a smile.

Grasshopper, thanks for the note about the gun. I went with something different.

Peace

Old Dog
Bruce <Bruce@mannlawfirm>
USA - Tuesday, January 26, 1999 at 03:34:45 (ZULU) 


Can I have some comments on a Standing offhand shooting position. Does the military teach a standing offhand where the rest hand is palm up and fingers are pointing toward you? I saw a clean cut young man who appeared to military possibly SF shooting last summer in like this. The gun he was shooting was a FN/FAL. Nice looking. Didn't recognize the scope though. Was odd enough that he shot standing while others were unsupported prone. What is better is that he shot almost as well and posted a respectable score. This guy ended up shooting and leaving right away so I didn't get a chance to talk. Could be a new LE with some other shooting experience I suppose, but he acted the type who took his shooting seriously.

bill
bill <billmohr@borg.com>
Central, Ny, USA - Tuesday, January 26, 1999 at 03:43:14 (ZULU) 


Bruce, I tried your email but I guess my 1960's era computer said no to me. It woulden't let go. Kept giving me an error message.

On the Advanced course, sorry but no, the Basic course is the required training prior to the Advanced. Main problem is the wind up here. Most qualified guys have never shot in 35 - 45 mph wind at the extended ranges. We like to work our students into it rather than just dump them out there. The basic course will give you a prep out to 700 then the advanced takes you to 1000.

Hope to see you for a course or the Hathcock event.
 

Rod Ryan <ryan@stormmountain.com>
Elk Garden, WV, USA - Tuesday, January 26, 1999 at 03:57:59 (ZULU) 


Rod, How many of those free spots are you giving away.
Estes <estes@feist.com>
Flatland, Kansas, USA - Tuesday, January 26, 1999 at 04:50:36 (ZULU) 
Rod,
Now let me get this straight,if I insult you and tell you and that "Jar Head" you hired that you two couldn't hit the broad side of a barn can I come to Storm Moutain free too??? If so let me know and I will really let loose with a string of insults, esp. where Gooch is concerned, because I can't think of anything I would enjoy more than one of his schools!!!

Grasshopper,
I am not sure what your match is ,is it the one thats called the "Mud Brigade" or something like that?? It sounds like fun if thats it and if I lived closer you can damn well bet I would be out there with you. I think maybe everyone is taking a lot of stuff to personal on here and we need to "Cool" off and remeber were all after the same thing. I've seen varmint hunters make shots that would make a world class shooter envious so just because you don't carry a sniper MOS or your not a LE sniper doesn't mean you can't shoot or out shoot someone who is . I think the original argument started over equiptment and its use. There is a definate difference in what is required for sniping and tactical shooting than what is used in other types of shooting. I don't think anyone ment that the sniper or the tactical shooter is a better shooter than the hunter or target or varmint shooter only that the equiptment needs are different. Just as you wouldn't deer hunt with a 14 lb varmint rifle or visa versa. So lets get back to arguing about guns and equiptment and quit throwing around all this testostrone.
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Tuesday, January 26, 1999 at 04:57:47 (ZULU) 


Torsten,
You're correct in that the credited writer of "The Storekeeper" is not the operator in the story. I was told that "Hays" intially told the story to Haschemeyer and then later read it over and checked it for accuracy. But between those two, the editors who picked up the story, and then the printers, no doubt some technical errors made it past or crept in.

I hope there wasn't anything so glaringly bad that it invalidated the essay for you--just glad you found some value in it.
 

Grail <htngo@unforgettable.com>
USA - Tuesday, January 26, 1999 at 07:04:02 (ZULU) 


How come the Duty Roster is one long thread insead of a collecton of thread like under "Events?"

GreyGhost
GreyGhost <darklove@bellsouth.net>
USA - Tuesday, January 26, 1999 at 09:16:18 (ZULU) 


´cause we likes it that way !
T <lasercon@dialup.globe.de>
- Tuesday, January 26, 1999 at 09:57:49 (ZULU) 
Gentlemen, shooters and all others...Having been former military and also in LE [not now(commo side, so maybe I don't qualify)] and having worked with "Target Interdictors" (PC correct terminoligy), I have seen the bias of both sides. Many remarks have been made about ONLY wanting to hear from "Qualified" people. WTF Over ???!!! Since when did this place become a REAL "Sniper" ONLY AO ?? I put up with that both in the Army and around LE types..."if you ain't Airborne you ain't S**T" or "what do you know?? You're commo" I doubt very seriously if any trained and active "operator" is going to openly print tactics and other tidbits of info on this hallowed site. So with that said,"CHILL OUT !!" Alot of what I have learned about "accuracy" came from benchresters and "old timers" who had BTDT. What I learned about stealth and hides came from a NCO who had been with CCN and also the LRRPS. He never made any long distance shots but the knowledge he gave about staying alive under adverse conditions could be made into a book ! Dunn taught me about carrying TWO compasses and to always have a backup plan for extraction , just in case aviation had a bad night and couldn't get over their hangovers in time to get us out .

Learn what you can from who you can and if someone makes a statement that causes questions then "Check it out"..."Question Authority" all that stuff. Lets get over this US vs THEM attitude...BECAUSE there are OTHERS out there that are truly trying to have sites like this and places like SM closed down. Don't believe me?? Then check out some other sites that keep upwith Congressional actions....sad but true the anti gunners are at work.

Marius, my apologies for being so long-winded, I'll try to keep it brief next time !! Who else will be at the SHOT Show ?? Has anyone heard that next years SHOT show to be held in New Orleans (I think) has been cancelled due to N.O.'s lawsuit against gun manufacturers?? Just heard that in passing....Hmmmm???
OUT HERE

Will <willadams@mindspring.com>
USA - Tuesday, January 26, 1999 at 10:14:04 (ZULU) 


On some Sniper rifles I see these adjustable butt spikes that are to take the place of the old bean sock. This UMAT shooting mat has it as well.

Have any of you shot these ? or own one and can comment on the stabilety of the whole deal.

It seems to me that having a rigid support would disturb the free recoil of the rifle like placing the stock on a solid rest.

The only use I can see is that you can set the rifle on target and dont have to hold it all the time while observing, but then again I would observe through Binos or spotting scope.

So is there a real need for this gadget or is it a " Headspace Problem "

SHOT Show! I have my HQ @ Booth 9256

"Ende"
Torsten <lasercon@dialup.globe.de>
G3ermany - Tuesday, January 26, 1999 at 11:25:48 (ZULU) 


Torsten,

I heard Mista Gooch designed the butt spikes, If you miss your shot you simply turn the rifle over and fall on the spike. NO FUSS, NO MUSS!Kinda like that Roman Dude thingee they used to do with swords for FUBAR's in ancient times.

Rod,
Got any room for another Hillbilly? I can be 10-8 in one hour and I'll pick up the Possum medallions, Moonpies n' Ne-Hi's at Sheetz on the way.
 

Calling all Un-Dudes!
Calling all Un-dudes!
A real California shooter is needed for the Mud Wrestlers quorum

Grasshopper, uh, Mud-Dude

C'mon guy you can do better than throw insults..... Methinks care must be taken playing with those lit charcoal filled urns, you might really get burned quite badly my friend.
Read the TS article, pretty cool stuff Dude, nice rigs but no most excellent starlettes in the pix. You interested in the Postal thingee?
peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
bIG cITY, bY-gAwD, USA - Tuesday, January 26, 1999 at 13:10:57 (ZULU) 


Bill Mohr,

Was the standing dudes fingees up or down? The Soviet Block Dudeskies came up with something like that for free rifle and UIT stuff claiming that it was ergonomically correct and offered a better platform, if my faulty memory serves me right.
A duly appointed & anointed Court Jester at another shooting site "Invented" a palm base and finger forwards technique called "The Artillery Hold" which I just saw in an ancient dude book from the turn of the century.
I normally use a fingee bridge with thumb at front trigger guard screws (base/index) and tips as feels good.

BUT,

I HATE STANDING! BTDT in a buncha matches, windy city stuff, and the field and I abhor it. Have Had some real knock down / drag out conversations about the merits of standing with the shooting Neanderthals.

Tactical (anything and everything that can be done to give you the winning edge) Shooting should means using any support possible, well at least according to this simple Hillbilly.

I pass the torch to the next runner Dude ..................
 

peteR

peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
C.R.S. CITY, BY-ALL SHOOTERS HERE- GAWD!, USA - Tuesday, January 26, 1999 at 14:27:39 (ZULU) 


Hold on now, the free offer is a trade between me and Grasshopper. You other guys that want to insult me and others in the trade, well you'll have to stand in line. We only allow one set of courses per year to insulters.

I hope I dident come off as a "If you are not a Military Sniper you arnt S_ _ t". That's not what I intended. I was first a hunter, then a Military sniper and then a LE sniper. I dont claim that either one is better than the other, or that I am the great guru. I am a student of the art of long range marksmanship and survival. That is all, end of story. The main thing we want to do at the school is pass on information and lessions learned. We have all types of shooters attend the school. I dont care one iota what your background or why you want to attend the school. Just that you are motivated to doing your very best and you keep a serious mindset as to why the school exists. To train snipers.
 
 

Rod Ryan <ryan@stormmountain.com>
Elk Garden, WV, USA - Tuesday, January 26, 1999 at 14:59:20 (ZULU) 


As for the "Spikes" , Gooch says the only spikes he wants to talk about are his robin egg spike heels.
Rod Ryan <ryan@stormmountain.com>
WV, USA - Tuesday, January 26, 1999 at 15:01:53 (ZULU) 
Will, Rod, Pat; I won't comment on your last posts cause I can't think of anything that would do anything but detract from their excellence. The "hopper" is sucking you into some good fun out there I'd bet. These recent posts are zackly the kind of thinking/discussion I wanted surface when I did my assault on Pablito. He will forgive me some day I fondly hope. Scott is sitting quietly on Tylenol liquid and hopefully he too will recover from the site migrain of the past few days! Long live the "Barrel Brothers" we will overcome. I'd predict that nobody cleans anybody's clock in CF.
B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Tuesday, January 26, 1999 at 15:43:31 (ZULU) 
Will and Rod,
Well put and I think that is the way most all of us feel, including Pablito. I don't think he ment his post as a "personal" thing only in reference to EQUIPTMENT and thats the way "I" also took it. I know many times we can read things into posts that aren't ment to be there. In one of my early posts I came off sounding like a condesending jerk on my post in responce to a question on shooting groups and how they compare to what a "Sniper" could shoot and it sure wasn't ment that way. Rod, I would like to be in line for next years "Insulting spot" though, with some time, I could really light Gooch up(HA) Oh well, I am probably to "Old" anyway, to come out there and play with the Kids.
 
 
 
 
 
 

Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Tuesday, January 26, 1999 at 17:37:56 (ZULU) 


Rod Ryan - Article is "Sacramento Snipers" in comment and article section. Steve Helsley also did an article in Tactical Shooter #4. WV is a long ways to drive from, it took a friend and me most of two weeks to drive to OH and back last summer. I'll email you and see what we can work out. (I guess I should have limited my offer to within the state or its neighbors, that's what I get for shooting my mouth off.) We're not "competition" shooters in the conventional sense, we try to get as close to field conditions as we can within the limitations of our facilities.

Pat - "Mudville Militia" is the term I think you are referring to. That's more a perjorative term others refer to us as, we don't really have a name for ourselves.

peteR - Read my post again, I don't think I insulted anyone. Yeah, I was blowing off some steam, sorry if my perceptions were out of line, but I've been lurking for almost a year and got tired of waiting for signs our common interest in tactical shooting would lead to more contact between the "pros" and the rest of us. I think our little group is pretty good, but it's frustrating not knowing for sure how we stack up. We've got probably the best public shooting facility within several states, I find it hard to believe there's only one duty-slotted shooter in that entire area that feels it's worth the trip.
Grasshopper <wd6cmu@netcom.com>
Richmond, CA, USA - Tuesday, January 26, 1999 at 19:37:55 (ZULU) 


Grasshoppa,

paragraph one, yep agree!

paragraph two, Dude Absolutely!

paragraph three, LEO's N, Military good question, talked to the Un-Dude? Gotta be some others, how about through Californias shooters/ firearms associations, LEO contacts?

paragraph three, Uh-unbridled challenge to all non-hobbyist shooters? Great idea; thats kinda what I wanted with the postal match, just a little more diplomatically worded I guess. And your grammar and punctuation are much better than my poor hillbilly typing.

closing statement, ABSOLUTELY shoot hard and often.

chao!

peteR
peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
BIG CITY, bY-gAwD, USA - Tuesday, January 26, 1999 at 20:20:24 (ZULU) 


THIS PLACE RRRRUUUUUULLLLLEEESSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

adam Wall <j_rodriguez18@hotmail.com>
Mt. Olive, IL, USA - Tuesday, January 26, 1999 at 20:23:51 (ZULU) 


OK Pete I hear you. Grasshooper, one little old, with bad knees and glasses Police Sniper would like to play in your event. Please Email me the schedule so I can try to take some time off. I only need gas from Oakland Calif.

Rod I will trade you gas money for the two classes. I know my limitations. Because of fifteen years of police sniper shooting to 300 yards I will go with anyone to there, but you guys start at 300 and I will take a basic to get my feet wet. Heck the 600 is the differrence for me in jumping into the Master Class in High Power. For all you short range shooters out there, learning to read the wind and mirage is not easy and or learned by reading alone. Rod have you guys put Gooch in a cage?

The UnDude, Mike
Mike M. <DMMDNLN@AOL.COM>
Calif, USA - Tuesday, January 26, 1999 at 20:44:36 (ZULU) 


Grasshopper,
Sorry for the misquote on the name of the article. I thought that might be the group you were referring to. Like I said I would love to be able to shoot with a bunch like that. There are a few damn good varmint hunters around here and we do shoots on that order with coyote cut outs to fill in the months when we can't hunt but I like to shoot the real long range stuff and ususlly do it by myself. I, like you, always wondered how I would stack up against the "Pros", as you call them, so I went to Wyoming to that tactical shoot and I found out I was better than some and not as good as others but more important I found a whole bunch of great guys who loved long range shooting as much as I did. After three days of shooting and BSing I came away with some great memories and some new friends that I look forward to seeing next year. If you get the chance get out of your own back yard and go to these shoots, if you can its well worth your time, you will never regret it even if you finish dead last or take home first place you can't help but come away with new found friends.
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Tuesday, January 26, 1999 at 20:45:07 (ZULU) 
AH Glasshoppa, Be careful what you wish for. I have had the great priviledge to go to SMTC and see Rod-San shoot and learn from him. He is, no doubt, a shooter, real life been there done that, got the t-shirt.

He is one hell of a teacher too. And a fine Gentleman.( no offense meant Rod.)

Be careful that Mr. Ryan does'nt belly crawl up and stick you with a candy bar Jody.

I know Scott probably does not want us to be making bets on SC but I wanna start taking up the "book" for this shoot-out!
Cory Wilson <Ranger9@hotmail.com>
Panama, FL, USA - Tuesday, January 26, 1999 at 21:22:19 (ZULU) 


I am a Cpl. in the Marine Corps and a school trained Scout Sniper. I enjoy long range marksmanship, as well as combat pistol and shotgun. If anyone has any questions about Marine Sniping, feel free to e-mail me.

Semper Fi,
John F. Mcquay <wraith144@aol.com>
Camp Lejeune, NC, USA - Tuesday, January 26, 1999 at 21:26:33 (ZULU) 


I hope you can answer many questions for me. I have had my eye on a Remington 700VS. It is a decent weapon for the price. But I don't know much about scopes, actually very little. I frequent sniper country and try to soak up all the information I can.

I am an admirer of the art of LR shooting and would like to get into it more than what the average Infantryman is tought. By this I mean the usual qualification range in the back 40. BRM and ARM.

These questions should be answered from the novice point of view. With reguards to my improvement as time goes by.

Questions:
1. Should a scope be variable power?
2. Some scopes have adjustments "on the spot"
ie. Leupold Vari-X III 3.5-10x40mm LR M3
and others have those caps you need to remove to adjust the windage and elevation. Which is better?
3. Which is the better reticle; duplex, target dot, or 3/4 Mil-Dot?
4. In dealing with adjustment resolution should I go with a 1/4 or 1/2 in min. for wind and elevation, or a combination?
5. Is price that important? I do realize you get what you pay for, but some companies are out to really make a buck.

If there is any info that I have missed, and I am sure there is please fill in the blanks for me

Thanks for the input
Ed <hawaiihawk@aol.com>
AZ, USA - Tuesday, January 26, 1999 at 22:45:56 (ZULU) 


Pat - I think Wyoming would be about a 2-day drive from here, I might just be able to make it. I'll have to keep it in mind.

Rod Ryan - Just wanted to give my personal thanks for your school's policy of accepting anyone with a desire to learn. Have seen other places that won't even sell you a video tape without a badge and department stationary.

Non-sequitur:

I know you're hoping to find
someone who's gonna give you peace of mind

When times go bad, when times go rough
won't you let me down in tall grass and let me do my stuff
Grasshopper <wd6cmu@netcom.com>
Richmond, CA, USA - Tuesday, January 26, 1999 at 22:47:29 (ZULU) 


Anyone familiar withthe Ultra Accurate Rifle System by Autauga Arms, Inc. If so, what are you feelings and feed back about this rifle. Also, if there are any other pertinent information on this company or rifle you have, I would appreciate the information...

Darren
Darren <darren@nimbusconsulting.com>
San Francisco, CA, USA - Tuesday, January 26, 1999 at 23:01:15 (ZULU) 


Ed:
Questions:
1. Should a scope be variable power?
If all you are going to do is target shooting fixed is okay but in the field it helps to have the variable for the close shots.

2. Some scopes have adjustments "on the spot"
ie. Leupold Vari-X III 3.5-10x40mm LR M3
and others have those caps you need to remove to adjust the windage and elevation. Which is better?
It doesn't really matter if the knobs are designed properly. The caps can be nice if you are afraid of something bumping into the knobs and throwing off the zero. Personally I do not think they are necessary.

3. Which is the better reticle; duplex, target dot, or 3/4 Mil-Dot?
Mil dot all the way.

4. In dealing with adjustment resolution should I go with a 1/4 or 1/2 in min. for wind and elevation, or a combination?
I know people are going to disagree with me but I don't think anybody can judge the wind to 1/4 min so if the scope you select is only available with 1/2 min I wouldn't worry about it.

5. Is price that important? I do realize you get what you pay for, but some companies are out to really make a buck.
Generally you get what you pay for and this really applies to scopes. Most people think of Tasco as a cheap scope but you will hear great reviews of their tactical scope, the price is $500, not much less than Leupold. You did not say what caliber your rifle is but if it is a standard cartidge that cams for the Leupold M3 I would recommend the M3LR, everybody here seems to love it.

If you have anymore questions feel free to email me, I wish someone had told me about this when I started into the long range game.
Shooter <shooter@unix.tamu.edu>
College Station, Tx, USA - Wednesday, January 27, 1999 at 00:40:42 (ZULU) 


The Boltman's computers are going to the doc tomorrow. They are el sicko. I hope to get back sometime. Wish me luck with backing everything up (scares the hell out me) and save the juicy stuff.
Bolt <mbolt34547@aol.com>
USA - Wednesday, January 27, 1999 at 01:13:06 (ZULU) 
Surplus .308 ammo-- in case anyone is interested. I bought some Hirtenberger and some Norma surplus .308, figuring it would be the best of what was being offered. Some of the other offerings were from countries that, well, you just wouldn't expect their ammo to be the greatest. Both came packaged 20/box, but upon opening the Swedish stuff, I found that it was delinked MG ammo-- looked like it had been in a belt on top of a tank in the weather for some time. It wasn't so bad as to be unuseable or unsafe, though. I think they probably had tumble-cleaned it prior to reboxing it. Not shiny and new, but not a bad deal at .14/round. You could hit oranges with it at 100 yds, but I wouldn't use it on cherry tomatoes. The Hirt is clean and new looking, also .14 or .15/rd. I haven't fired it in anything but a FAL yet, and that was not off the bench, so I can't yet comment on how it groups. I will try to get a few out of a VSSF over the weekend and report back. Both varieties use steel jacketed bullets.
Ned <michigun@net-link.net>
3R, MI, USA - Wednesday, January 27, 1999 at 03:12:12 (ZULU) 
No bets, I dont want anyone pissed at me for loosing mommas milk money. Cory. And I'm no gentleman.

I'm to tired to go back down to the bottem of the page but who ever said it is right. The friendships we gain and the brotherhood we belong to is our reward. When I was a little younger, we said that the "TEAM" was everything (two man team), now, I must say that the team is still everything. It (the team) is now all shooters that belong to the team.

Gooch is not in the cage. He has had some serious computer problems and is in the process of reinstalling some software. We are also in the middle of a complete re-work of some of our lession plans and AV stuff.

PeteR: I owe you a hat, your the first to step up to the shooting line for the Gunny. Thanks.

Here you go guys, PeteR lead the way. We need shooters for this event. Even if you cant make it out to the shoot. send some bucks to help out.

The next guy that sends in his money ($150) I'll give a basic sniper course to. June only. You guys who are already in the June course, sorry, your not eligable.

Just so you'll know, I'll post the results here. I'll also try to keep this give away stuff going to get the ball rolling.
 
 
 

Rod Ryan <ryan@stormmountain.com>
Elk Garden, WV, USA - Wednesday, January 27, 1999 at 03:20:12 (ZULU) 


Ed,
Shooter gave you good advice, I have the M3 LR and its great for tactical long range shooting. If you decide not to go with it when you get to engaging targets at different ranges its easy to forget how many turns you have made on the turret of the quarter minute scopes. I started off with a 4.5x14 and loved it but I found I could easlly forget where I was when shooting multiple targets at different ranges. Since I've got the M3 I haven't looked back and would love to get another for my 260. Just my thoughts.
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Wednesday, January 27, 1999 at 04:35:12 (ZULU) 
ladies n gentleman dudes n dudettes:
 

three littles words folks......................
 

"FOR THE GUNNY!"
 

Sound Off!
 

peteR
peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
COLD-CITY, bY-gAwD, USA - Wednesday, January 27, 1999 at 12:34:31 (ZULU) 


I have a set of dual dove tail mounts and rings(Med) on my heavy barrel 260. I put the ATI shim under the mounts and I still can not get enough come ups out of my M3 LR to get to 1000yds. It stops at about 750. My question is will I be able to go to the low rings and still clear my barrel and will this then cure my problem?? I have about one eigth of an inch maybe a little more now for clearence. Any ideas??

Bill R,
Didn't you say you had a Savage or two?? I have a guy who works with me who can't get his on paper at 100yds with a 6.5X20 Leupold. He has run out of windage adj. on the scope and he doesn't want to go the the Leupold mounts with the windage screw. Any ideas on what his problem might be and how he can correct it with out changing bases??
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Wednesday, January 27, 1999 at 15:23:20 (ZULU) 


I always read messages where people say that the scopes with one-turn elevation knobs are better because they're easier to use when shooting at multiple targets at different ranges, that makes sense to me. However I also remember reading in some books that a sniper shouldn't fire too quickly between shots and never from the the same hiding place so as not too become a target himself. That makes sense also.
Two conflicting ideas that both seem to be right. What's the story here? What do the Marines teach?

Kodiak <rvl@inil.com>
USA - Wednesday, January 27, 1999 at 15:59:39 (ZULU) 


Kodiak:
The Marine Sniper SOP is to fire no more than 3 shots from a single position. Of course any operator will tell you situatuion dictates. Gunny Hathcock as you will remember took on an NVA company in elephant valley, but thta was a specific circumstance, and he had possetion of the key terrain, and fire support was available. We train to rapidly engage targets at different ranges. This is accomplished with the use of range cards, and the two man team. Once the first target has been engaged, the spotter will call sector and range to the Sniper, so he can aquire the target. Meanwhile the spotter is dialing on range corrections. This way the target can be engaged in the minumum amount of time, with out the sniper breaking his position. The Unertle scope is very well suited to rapid adjustments due to its elevation course/fine adjustment rings.
As far as should you engage multiple targets in a tactical situation. Yes, No, Maybe. If you are on top of a fortified position(as we were in '97 in Sierra Leone) everyone already knows where you are, so it makes no difference. If you are in the jungle near an enemy CP. Then there is no way i would do it. Hope this answers your question.
John M. <wraith144@aol.com>
Camp Lejeune, NC, USA - Wednesday, January 27, 1999 at 20:00:31 (ZULU) 
If anyone is looking for a new 700 VS in .308 you might have your dealer try Grice Wholesale. They were the only distributor that I tried who had any in stock. They had two and I took one of them. I tried Jerry's Sport Center, Zanders, Bangers, Sports South, Bill Hicks, and AcuSport before finding the two at Grice. Nice people to deal with as well. Their phone number is (800) 334-7423.
Doc <docs@fidnet.com>
The Ozark boonies, MO, USA - Wednesday, January 27, 1999 at 20:21:57 (ZULU) 
Pat; I have had a few Savages and usually they aren't too bad as to having the screws tapped badly but it has happened before. I would suggest it is probably a combination of a scope with a small range and maybe a mount or... it could be hole trouble. I would try another scope if one's available and see if it is still off in the same direction. If so... maybe different bases if that's practical but... probably none of this is going to fix it There is a lot of sentiment against the standard twist on Leupold mount I know. But if you boresight and lock tight the right hand screw (either one for that matter) the other one won't move in my experience . The front twist in thing also is suspect but I can't say I've ever had a problem with one. I suspect the front one has been blamed where the rear one was actually moving. I've seen and used the popular M-series mounts and they are probably the best for sure and I've also used the ones you can take off and put back on. I did note those were a bit prone to reset about 1/2 minute off so I won't brag on them but the standard Leupold's are really quite good unless we're talking real serious as in life or death I would not want to advise a person but if you're alive by only the amount they will drift you're too close to the grim reaper anyway. Those other mounts could be the reason and I'd try a cheapie mount on there and see if it cures the problem before you give up on the holes. That is just to find out what the problem is not to fix it... That is most unfortunate to find yourself in that gig! I know that's not much help and the pro's would take exception to the use of a mount that is not optimum and I wouldn't argue the point but it would be a better alternative than using a scope that is all the way to one side on adjustments if that is what it boils down too. If you have a bore sighter this can all be done without having to shoot by noting where you are now and where you want to go. It may appear to be going backwards though be sure to note the clicks R/L other than the movement on the screen as it is backwards to what you will probably expect. You might switch the front mount with the back one I believe that will work on a savage if my alziemers serves me right if it's a 2piece base of course.

B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Wednesday, January 27, 1999 at 20:59:07 (ZULU) 


To; Sarge; M1 Garand a Sniper Rifle? I have a Garand I got from the old DCM several years ago. Since then, it has been rebuilt by Springfield Armory into an "Ultra-match" rifle. Using Federal Match ammo, and my 70 year old eyes, I can get 1&1/4 inch, 5 shot groups. Not satified with that, this past summer, I had a Burris 10X handgun scope mounted scout style. It shoots 3/4 inch 5 shot groups. I call it my M1E. A natural successor to the militarys' M1C & M1D, but far more accurate. The side-mounted scopes on the military sniper rifles were difficult to shoot, in my estimation. If you were sighted in at 2 hundred yards, then had to take a shot at 3 hundred yards, you would miss, unless you were really good at "Kentucky windage." Remember, the line of sight of the scope, and line of sight of the bore had to converge at 2 hundred yards in order to hit your target. Of course, out at 3 hundred yards, your bullet would pass off to the left of the target. I learned to love this old battle rifle over fif