Sniper Country Duty Roster

January 1999



To all our readers here at Sniper Country, we wish to take this time to wish you the Happiest of New Years. Though I'm posting this I'm sure Marius and Scott (x-ring) will agree, that without your dedication and support Sniper Country could not be what it is today!
Here is to a even greater new year. May your hand be steady and your aim be true. THANK YOU!

Sarge

Sarge <garryrn@dfn.com>
Area 51, NM USA - Friday, January 01, 1999 at 00:41:45 (EST) 


Happy New Year to all at Sniper Country. We may not all agree on the finer points of riflery, but it is nice to see that we all respect one another's opinions. Its been fun - and I believe 1999 will be even better. Good Night Everyone. Good Night Russ - wherever you may be. Hope you are happy!!

al
Alexander Ostapowicz <aaostapowicz@worldnet.att.net>
Getting Ready for Usher In 1999 with my Sweetie in Blustery, Ohio USA - Friday, January 01, 1999 at 01:09:33 (EST) 


What a night, wrecks, drunkens, "Happy New Years" wife bashings galore, and no Crullers at 7-11! Uh none for me thank you very much Sir!But, I Counted over fifty harvestable size deer, Sorry no NOD's or rifle at sighting time all you Bambi Slayers.

Pat(Mr Bullet),
I Hope all goes well for your wife and both of you return home safely. Do you want to tell Jeff A. we're increasing the voltage in therapy or should I?

Bolt,
Try the Hornady TAP too in addition to X-rings selections. Did ya get the PSS for X-mas? Harris shorty and/or tripod gets my vote!
 

Euro-Dudes:
Is that Walther "cheapie" anything like the old KKM's i think that was the model? a most excellent price!

Chao for now!
 

peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
DEER-CITY, bY-gAWd USA - Friday, January 01, 1999 at 11:06:07 (EST) 


peteR,
Oh the memories!!! New Years was always a time of joy for everyone ,except Law Enforcement, we always had to clean up the mess. I was a State Trooper so mine were usually on the highway.
I think Jeff A. has probably had "To Much" electricity and now he's getting really charged up with all that computer time(HA) Happy New Year Pete!!
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Friday, January 01, 1999 at 12:46:07 (EST) 
Thank you all for the fun I had with this site in 1998 and I hope this will continue throughout this new year.

"Ende"
Torsten <lasercon@dialup.globe.de>
G3ermany - Friday, January 01, 1999 at 13:14:54 (EST) 


Its cold, its snowing, and I love it!

Greetings from West by Gawd. Got another couple of days up here then its back to Clintonia to pack my trash, my dog and my guns to head back.

Storm Mountain is everything I thought it would be, except colder.

Mike - Brought your slings up here and we are going to play today. We are thinking about using them at a combat Service Rifle match with AR's in Canada this year.

PNgreif. I fit the saddle to my tripod looks good. I'll be getting with Kudu and make some minor mods to the attachment system and we'll let the students play with it this spring.

We are stroking the databook. My moving is slowing this down a bit but we'll have for you guys soon enough for spring.

Rick, you gotta get your butt up here man. Bring the old lady.

Kudu, Hoist me.

Well guys gotta go.

See ya.
 

gooch <gooch@stormmountain.com>
Elk Garden, WV USA - Friday, January 01, 1999 at 14:02:50 (EST) 


To those who know about the PSS with the 5R barrel:
I never heard of these barrels before you guys mentioned them. I read one message that said they were 24" barrels with uncrowned muzzles. This gun is put away for the winter and is kind of hard to get at it now to check the number of grooves. My PSS is parkerized, has a 24" barrel and an uncrowned muzzle so now I'm wondering if I have one of these barrels on my gun. My question is: are all the 24", uncrowned, parkerized PSSs the 5R version? I bought this PSS about 6 years ago from a police supply store that doesn't sell to the public. They told me that they don't sell many rifles there so it may have been sitting in storage for a while before I bought it making it older than 6 years. Thanks for your help.
Kodiak <rvl@inil.com>
USA - Friday, January 01, 1999 at 15:28:36 (EST) 
Does anyone know where I can find some unusual USMC t-shirts? Does anyone have a phone # for Bob Depp's T-shirt place in Kentucky?
Ding <ding@stev.net>
USA - Friday, January 01, 1999 at 15:33:15 (EST) 
Sans Broussard: I was visiting a shooting friend New Years morning and can give you a title to get out of the Library. (Good thing I learned 4-wheeling driving techniques in the service - the city hadn't plowed the streets.) He had a small thick book packed with exquisite technical detail on just about every imagineable military bolt action.

You are hereby directed to get the following book:

"Book of Rifles", by WHB Smith & Joseph E Smith, The Stackpole Company, copyright 1948 by the NRA, reprinted in 1960 and 1963. The Library of Congress number is 63-12562.

Good reading and have fun identifying your rifle.

Terry
Terry Warner <twarner@sk.sympatic.ca>
Canada - Friday, January 01, 1999 at 15:38:12 (EST) 


Hi can someone comment on the relation
between twist rate and bullet weight for
the .308? I understand that in the .223
faster rate is recommended for the heavier,
longer bullets where 62-80 gr can use 1-8
or faster rate. Is there a similar relation
for the .308? What's a good weight for 1:12?
Thank you, everyone, and have a nice new year.
Hello Mr. Nosack!

Lou
Lou S <spunkbubble@juno.com>
S. Fla USA - Friday, January 01, 1999 at 18:06:08 (EST) 


To all a Happy New Year. To all I promised slings, they should be sent out next week(Sorry Ex Wife troubles have taken alot of my spare time lately)

Products I have recently tried that are great: 1. Slope doper this thing is great and thanks Dave for it. 2. MilDot Master You are a god for inventing this. Everyone should have one.

I was sorry to hear about B&L stopping production of the Tactical scope. The more I use mine the more I like it.
Mike M. <DMMDNLN@AOL.COM>
Calif USA - Friday, January 01, 1999 at 23:15:35 (EST) 


Lou: Gunsmiths generally use the Greenhill Formula to determine the optimal twist for a given bullet. The formula is T=150(d/r) for velocities from about 1500 to 2800 fps. Substitute 180 for the 150 value for velocities exceeding 2800 fps. "T" is the twist rate. "d" is the bullet diameter. "r" is the bullet length to diameter ratio (length of bullet divided by diameter). In .308, it works out fairly well. Sierra 168 grain Matchking is 0.308 inches in diameter. Bullet length is about 1.210 inches so we have a length to diameter ratio of 3.929. Plugging this value into the formula and using the 150 constant (the proven best velocity for the 168 grain MK is 2550 - 2600 fps), we get T=150 x (.308/3.929); T=150 x 0.078; T=11.76 inches or 11 3/4 inch twist …. One rotation of the bullet for every 11.76 inches of barrel traveled. This is very, very close to the "standard" 12 twist barrels on our PSS's and on my Chandler and one of the reasons they shoot the 168s so well. The 175 Matchkings do not perform as well in the 12 twist barrels. Again diameter is 0.308 inches. Bullet length is 1.257 inches, resulting in an ld ratio of 4.081. … plugging into formula (optimal velocity is 2500 to 2550 fps so we will use the 150 constant again) T = 150 x (.308/4.081); T = 150 x 0.0755; T = 11.320. That approximate half iinchtwist difference makes a big difference in my guns. 12 twist barrels tolerate 175s but do not excel with them. My Hart 26" 10 twist barreled .308 tactical rig, built by John Eckenrode on a Remington 700 SA in a McMillan A2 stock with Ross guard and Leupold 3.5 x 10 M3 LR, eats 168s, 175s, 180s and 190s alive. I'll never go back to slower barrels. The general rule of thumb is to use the fastest twist you can tolerate and match to the longest bullet (usually heaviest) you intend to use for the life of the barrel. I don't remember the exact source of the Greenhill formula. He was a Brit and developed it back in the late 1920s. I obtained the formula from a friend while working at Navy Intel.
Bill <lhardin1@netscape.net>
Clearwater, FL USA - Friday, January 01, 1999 at 23:40:30 (EST) 
I have a question about a scope mentioned in the
weapon system review: "Savage Rifles: 110FP Tactical,
112FV, and 112BVSS"

The author mentioned that all of his rifles have
Tasco 6x24 40mm scopes on them.

Does anyone which flavor? (...there are several
Tasco's of that power)

I have been looking at scopes that are considerably more
expensive that the above mentioned....but if it's good
for him.....it may very well be good enough for me !!!

Has anyone had experience with these scopes ???

Thanks for the help !!!
Ken <kknjoey@webzone.net>
Broken Arrow, OK USA - Saturday, January 02, 1999 at 01:02:51 (EST) 


I'm looking to get an AR-10 and need to move some possessions to do it. I have an AN/PQS 4A IR laser sight for the AR 15, ART II scope with Heavy Duty M14 mount, B&L Tactical, Stainless Fluted 20" AR15 barrel w/freefloat handguard. Anyone interested? Best offer that's not a joke.
David
David <bailey@lokey.cvinet.com>
USA - Saturday, January 02, 1999 at 11:05:52 (EST) 
Lou... While there is a fair amount of "Art" and "Disagreement" in this science of ballistics, I think your "Greenhill" formula is probably very close to being "Right on".
I am shooting a bunch of .308's with 12" twists, three are custom "Select Match" grade, and three are very good factory bbls. My normal procedure with a new gun, is to make a slew of loads starting fairly low, and work up. With 155 Palmas, and 168 Matchkings, it was typical that the groups would all be fairly good, and a few would really shine. I starting shooting the 175 Matchkings this fall, to match the BDC of my Leupold M3 LR, and found an interesting change... at the starting loads the groups were not good for the guns in question... groups were large-ish. But, as the loads got faster, the groups got smaller. To me, this indicated that the twist rate was marginal. At the velocities that I wanted, the groups were within reason for the guns, but I feel that if I drove them faster, they might go tighter.
I'm having a gun barreled by Shilen, and asked them for a 10" twist, and Gary Huntsman of Shilen Said "... Unless you are shooting bullets heavier than 168 grains, I'd use the 12 twist..." which supports the Greenhill formula's results. Also, the M24 bbls have a 11.25" twist, and were designed for the 175gr M118-LR load which uses the 175 Sierra Matchking.
How-some-ever, to throw some confusion into the pot for discussion…
Berger Bullets, says, on their web sight...
.308 CAL 155gr Very Low Drag Recommended twist rate is 1/14
.308 CAL 168gr Very Low Drag Recommended twist rate is 1/13
.308 CAL 175gr Very Low Drag Recommended twist rate is 1/13
.308 CAL 185gr Very Low Drag Recommended twist rate is 1/12
.308 CAL 190gr Very Low Drag Recommended twist rate is 1/12
.308 CAL 210gr Very Low Drag Recommended twist rate is 1/11
… and the Berger VLD's are longer, for a given weight, than the Sierra's???

Would be interested in results (not theories) of shooters that have shot the heavier Sierras and/or Bergers in 12" twist barrels at long range.

Pablito

Paul "Pablito" Coburn <condor@mags.net>
It's 2 damn degrees here!!!, in Connecticut! USA - Saturday, January 02, 1999 at 12:04:51 (EST) 


Sarge again wishes everyone a Happy New Year and asks:
OK so this isn't "really" a sniper weapon question but so many things here tend not to be - what do you'all think about the reliable old M-1 Garand? What is your experience with it and what is the cost in your area? And NO I'm not looking to go the CMP route my local shop has one in pretty good condition at the same price as CMP with all the BS from CMP! Yes I've been to Fulton Armory's site and a few others as well I'm looking for real world info here not advertisments! Thanks group!

Sarge

Sarge <garryrn@dfn.com>
Area 51, NM USA - Saturday, January 02, 1999 at 14:18:03 (EST) 


OK so I can't type....that should have read - same price as CMP WITHOUT all the BS from CMP.

Oh well! Hey Marius can we put a spell checker on this thing!!

Sarge
Sarge <garryrn@dfn.com>
Area 51, NM USA - Saturday, January 02, 1999 at 14:21:50 (EST) 


Bill,
I enjoyed your post on the twist rates you explained it very well!!

Pablito,
I have a 1 in 12 twist 308 tactical with a Hart heavy barrel and it shoots the 168s and 155s into .3s or under all day long. I tried some Berger 175 VLDs in it and they shot into .3 and 4s at 100yds and I then tried them at 400yds and they shot into .6 MOA and I was pleased with this until I shot the 155s which were under .5 MOA and 4 were in .25 MOA!! So I have to agree with what you say . Would you believe I let my kid talk me out of this rifle!!!
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Saturday, January 02, 1999 at 14:41:44 (EST) 


Kodiak,
You wrote:
I read one message that said they were 24" barrels with uncrowned muzzles.

All barrels have a crown, technically. It is where the bullet exits the barrel. Maybe what the writer meant was that the crown was not coned, counterbored, etc. Even a straight 90° cut across the barrel face is a "crown". A crown doesn't have to be fancy to do what is needed. Assume that the bullet is straight in the barrel (large assumption). We want the gases to vent evenly around the circumference of the bullet base as it breaks seal with the crown. You probably already know this.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lou,
I have no qualms with the Greenhill formula, and it has serve us well for century or so. I suggest you visit this site and enter the data that you have at hand and it will calculate the stability factor of the bullet. This is from the McGyro program developed by Bill Davis and Robert McCoy. This program takes into consideration:
O.A.L. of projectile
Nose length
Meplat diameter
Nose shape
Boattail length
End diameter
Twist rate
A stability factor of between 1.25 and 1.75 or so will serve you well.
http://www.lascruces.com/~jbm/ballistics/drag/drag.html

Although Bill from Clearwater uses the fastest twist consistent with several parameters, conventional thought it to use the slowest that will get the job done. This way bullet balance problems are not accentuated, but minimized. Now one can say, "I always use Bergers, etc. and my bullets ARE in balance." OK,…I use them too. But when bullets feed into the lead they are usually not concentric and on-axis with the bore and therefore take on a shape that is conducive to perfect balance.

I am just picking nits here, but thought you would like to hear the other side of the coin. Tactical people and target shooters SHOULD be picking nits. More accuracy never hurts and may do some good. No sense in giving it away for no benefit.

In Champions Choice catalog they mentioned stocking 1:11 twist Kreiger's for people who can not make up their mind. Sounds like a reasonable solution to me.

As an aside, back in the '60s and early '70s when 168s were used in benchrest competition, 1:14" twist ruled.

My Rem. 40-XC has a 1:12 ¼" twist barrel and uses 190 gr. Sierra's just fine.
Ron N. <rcn8@accnorwalk.com>
USA - Saturday, January 02, 1999 at 15:07:51 (EST) 


Sarge: My father was a veteran of many battles fought with a M-1 rifle and he thought it was designed by God. I am a veteran of many Rifles and few battles and I think it was a mistake if God had anything to do with it. It is a good way to remember glorious battles of long ago but as a modern day weapon. (Sorry Dad!) It is much lacking. The front sight is loose enough to prevent good accuracy unless you install the National Match equipment on it. The rear sight is always somewhere but where you want to be (in field conditions or clogged with mud) That operating rod is a POS unless you monitor it closely it will let you down. Damn thing is heavier than a scoped sniper rifle and half of that is packing crate wood! You must use the proper powder in them or they will shatter the stock of bend the rod. Slow burning powder is an accident waiting to happen. A soldier can be trained to assemble and disassemble one in about 6 weeks if he doesn't loose his fingers trying to close the bolt. Those 10 shot clips have only one purpose and that is to alert the enemy that your out of ammunition which you usually are because the stuff weighs too much to use in a semiauto. Patton said it was the best battle instrument ever devised and at the time he said it.... It probably was but times have changed.
It is made for one thing and that's to throw lots of heavy bullets down range and keep doing it till the barrel melts down. But a sniper rifle it ain't. Course you didn't say it was! God I get in a lot of trouble for things like this. Fidabeenthere I would have wanted a 1903 Springfield with a 4 power on it. Now there was a rifle! Happy New Year!
B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Saturday, January 02, 1999 at 15:33:51 (EST) 
Bedding with JB Weld
I recently re-bedded my stainless 26" varmint 308 with JB
and I found that it was a lot less runny than Plastic Steel
[it does't run down the barrel channel as bad]. Be carefull
of what you use as a release agent: Brownell's spray works well.
I once repaired a 2" x 6" hole in the transfer case of my
4x4 suburban with it (JBl Weld) and it is still leak free.
Merlyn <Merlynh@dtgnet.com>
Pierre, sd USA - Saturday, January 02, 1999 at 15:43:49 (EST) 
I am looking for some information on a rifle no one seems to have any info on this rifle.It is a CIL model 950c it looks just like a Savage model 110, it has a adjustable trigger for pull,weight and backlash. when I looked for mounts I found them under Churchill when I checked they are the same as a Savage 110. the rifle shoots great for optics I have a Tasco 3x9 50mm if this is a savage action I would like to put a synthetic stock on this rifle. any info would be appreciated.
thank you Swanny
Swanny Kranendonk <1scanner>
harvey station, nb canada - Saturday, January 02, 1999 at 15:58:09 (EST) 
Ron N.:
Sorry about the careless use of words.
 

A few years ago I got my hands on some Remington .308 Bench Rest brass but I never used it yet. I'm not sure why but they use small primers. Has anyone out there used this brass before? Any hints about this stuff that might save me time at the loading bench will be greatly appreciated.
Kodiak <rvl@inil.com>
USA - Saturday, January 02, 1999 at 16:01:30 (EST) 


Lou, barrel twist rate.
Everyone else has thrown in their 2cents worth so I will too.
When I had my first M1A built I went thru the same dilema and settled on a 1\12 twist because I planned to shoot mostly 168's. It shot these bullets very well. The rifle also shot the lake city match 172 gr. ammo well also, at 1000 yards. These bullets actually weigh about 174.5 grains by the way. Then the Gov. started issuing something called Special Ball about 1984. This stuff was special all right. This ammo would not hold a 6 foot target at 600 yards in my rifle. And I am not the only one who noticed this. As far as I could tell the bullets were the same as the old Lake City Match but they sure didnt group as well. I built another rifle with a 1/10 twist just to be able to compete again, but as soon as I finished the rifle, the Gov. stopped issuing Special ball and started issuing M852 again for the National matches. What I'm trying to say here is if you shoot enough target matches where you have to use the ammo provided, you will eventually question the twist rate of your barrel if it is on the slow side.
Also, there is alot more to setting up a rifle to shoot so called VLD bullets than selecting the right twist rate. The longer the bullet, the more critical it is to get the bullet started right in the throat of the barrel, This calls for tight neck chambers, concentric case necks, special throating, seating depth adjustments, and so on. All of this extra trouble does not go hand in hand with a tactical rig.
Just my 2 cents worth.
Steve <nato@bright.net>
S.C.D.H., Ohio USA - Saturday, January 02, 1999 at 16:40:16 (EST) 
Kodiak,
I have used a lot of Rem.BR brass and it's great stuff!!! The only problem with it is that the small primer will sometimes not ignite the powder well when it's cold. The other thing is the brass has a larger intrenal volume compared to other brass and there fore the velocity suffers. If you use the same load and your getting 2600fps you will drop to around 2400fps. with the same load in BR brass. When I went to the BR brass in my 308VS it droped my groups a .1 to .2 and I also didn't have those "flyers" that you can't figue out where they came from. The other thing you will need to do is get a Redding Bushing die because the brass is so thin the regular die will not size the neck sometimes. As I remember its only .009 to .010 thick it will nearly fit a tight neck rifle. I used 46grs of Varget with the 168s and was then able to reach 2600+fps and the accuracy was as good as my 4895 load only a lot faster. Hope this helps if you need any nore info let me know. I wish they still made it!!!
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Saturday, January 02, 1999 at 18:03:46 (EST) 
Sarge,
Memories, memories. US Rifle, caliber .30, M-1, a 9 1/2 pound, gas operated, clip fed, semi-automatic, shoulder weapon, sir! As I used to shout back at my Marine Gunney D.I.
I first shot a Garand in high school summer ROTC camp back in the 50's. I was so small I couldn't shoot it offhand; but I did fairly well prone. I have loved the bloody thing ever since. I carried one when I was a cadet in Navy pilot training at Pensacola,FL during the summer of 61 and learned to hate carrying it in the July sun. It will definitely bite the thumb that feeds it if you aren't careful and the 8 round en-block clip does tell everyone around that it's empty; but for an all around fun toy you can't beat it, plus it is definitely a historic piece of America's past. As B. Rogers said, it isn';t a sniper rifle. I bought my last one back around 1985 or 86 and gave $600 for it. It's a cherry Winchester and shoots pretty well. The Nineteenth Edition Blue Book shows $700 for one in 98% condition. I haven't seen one for sale around here in a very long time so don't know whether that's a realistic figure or not.
Doc <docs@fidnet.com>
Digging out from under the blizzard in the Ozark boonies, MO USA - Saturday, January 02, 1999 at 20:19:34 (EST) 
Gooch:

i would if there was anything to hoist.

got your 6 dude, need any assist........any at all, ll me back.

kudu out
kudu <kudu3@aol.com>
USA - Saturday, January 02, 1999 at 21:44:34 (EST) 


Awesome sight +
Keep up the good work.
B.M. Sprowl <midget@erols.com>
West Deptford, New Jersey USA - Saturday, January 02, 1999 at 22:19:10 (EST) 
Iam looking for Info on citadel barrels. Im thinking about buying one. I hear when they were in business they made a quality product. Thank you for any knowledge you can pass on.
J. Elledge <melchapman@sprintmail.com>
USA - Saturday, January 02, 1999 at 22:38:02 (EST) 
Swanny: your CIL is a Savage-made single shot target rifle. You got lucky. You have all the makings of a TARGET rifle, not a sniper rifle. A friend of mine has one rebarrled to .223 and it is a tackdriver at the long ranges (800 - 1000yds!). He likes the 69gr Sierras.

If you are interested in paper bullseye shooting go digging around the Dominion of Canada Rifle Assoc website for the Royal New Brunswick Rifle Association. If you are interested in selling ... There are a couple of peddlers I can name who will get the rifle into the proper market.
 

Terry Warner <twarner@sk.sympatico.ca>
Canada - Saturday, January 02, 1999 at 23:06:15 (EST) 


Kodiak... The Remington .308 brass ".308 Bench Rest brass" was never intended to be shot in a .308... back in the late 70's Remington released the model XP-100 pistol in 7/mmBR Rem, and 6/mm BR Rem...
But for some reason didn't release ammo. They chose to sell a special
brass called .308 "BR" to be used to form these cartridges. It was Remingtons effort to compete with the then overwhelming group of "PPC" cartridges.
The entent was that the .308 BR brass was to be used to make the cases for the new line of Rem "BR" line of guns (I'm sure that a lawer had something to do with it). After 3 or 4 years, Remington decided to come out with the completed cases...
The .308 "BR" brass was never entended to be shot in a .308...
... makes a lot of sense, doesn't it!!!
Pablito
Paqul "Pablito" Coburn <condor@mags.net>
USA - Sunday, January 03, 1999 at 00:18:03 (EST) 
I'm caught in my error. It is of course 8 shots in the M1 clips. Can't remember if it's been 10 years or 8 since I shot one! It will probably be that long before I shoot one again. Seriously I'm not meaning to deamean that old battle weapon but it did have a few shortcomings and I want the casual readers and those who tune in to learn to get the facts..... Thanks Pablito for correcting me!
B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Sunday, January 03, 1999 at 01:09:20 (EST) 
Speaking of BR type brass. I still have a couple of new boxes of Remington 6 BR brass whose flash holes were not punched. These were not mistakes, but were sold this way for the experimenter to drill at his discretion.
Ron N. <rcn8@accnorwalk.com>
USA - Sunday, January 03, 1999 at 02:55:03 (EST) 
I can't believe it. First off, I have to tunnel my way back home from the week-end because Kodiak and Russ couldn't keep the snow out of Chicago, and while I'm gone everyone jumps on rifle twist.
Where was rifle twist talk when I was ordering my new Hart barrel ?
Well, not all is lost. I was one of the few nuckle-heads that went with the 1-11 twist.
It would just be nice if I could only GET my rifle from the shop. I mean, Santa didn't bring me a case of Fed. 175gr. match ammo and a new Leupold M3 LR scope for nothing. I wasn't even good last year! But he knew how to get me. Yes sir-ree bob. Tack on a nother week or month to get my rifle from the shop. That fat bastard!!!

I hope that everyone had a good Christmas and new year.

Al, did Santa bring you your Mil-dot Master? He knew once I started playing around with the new M3 that I would have to buy one also. I honestly think that he is punishing me! Maybe next year I won't be so bad. Yeah, RIGHT!!!!!

Well, I can't get to the range to shoot for all the snow. Don't have my bolt rifle to shoot even if I could. What do ya do with all this snow? Did I mention that it snowed?
I think that it's time to dust off the skis and hit the slopes!
 
 

D. West <westforce@juno.com>
Too much snow in, IL. USA - Sunday, January 03, 1999 at 07:57:16 (EST) 


Kodiac,

The idea behind the small primers (in Remington 308 BR) is that it allows the powder to burn more evenly, But, ignition problems can happen.

Stay Safe
Depity Dave <dprolls@access.mountain.net>
Freezing my A__ off in , Blistering Cold West Virginia USA - Sunday, January 03, 1999 at 12:06:36 (EST) 


The Rookie asks first questions of year.

1. Ideal sniper spotter's backup weapon. AR15, etc?

2. Carry gear. For 3-5 day insertion, what gear to carry including tactical vest, backpack, ammo, food, etc.? Major Plaster's gear seems to be taylored to LE instead of field.

3. Are drag bags actually used on a mission, or just for carry purposes?

Scott, got the message, all slings are up for sale. Do you also remove the swivel studs? What do you fill the holes with?

Gillie monster suit construction is underway!

thanks, Bolt
Bolt <mbolt34547@aol.com>
USA - Sunday, January 03, 1999 at 13:03:42 (EST) 


Let's drag up the 5r barrel stuff one more time. Is there a way with the naked eye to tell if a barrel is a 5r? Have my eyes pealed, but still confused what their pealed for.
 

Bolt <mbolt34347@aol.com>
USA - Sunday, January 03, 1999 at 13:16:23 (EST) 


Thanks everybody for your input on the Rem .308 BR brass. Not knowing anything about that stuff I enjoy reading what other people have to say about it.

D. West:
In case you haven't noticed it snowed up here recently. Out in front of the house, somewhere in a chest deep snowdrift my car is waiting for me. Looks like we won't be shooting on that farm for a while.
Kodiak <rvl@inil.com>
Snowcity (Chicago), USA - Sunday, January 03, 1999 at 14:30:38 (EST) 


Thank you, everyone, for the
input on the .308 bullet weight
twist rate relationship. All
inputs were archived in the hard-
drive for future references for
myself and others w/ proper credits.

Sincerely,

Lou
Lou S <spunkbubble@juno.com>
S. Fla USA - Sunday, January 03, 1999 at 14:41:21 (EST) 


Bolt - Count the radials (Technically not lands and grooves). Normal barrels are even numbers I believe. In a 5R barrel there will be 5 "lands".

It appears that Storm Mountain will be fielding a team for this years Dominion of Canada Rifle Association/Canadian Forces Small Arms Championships. Any other schools up to fielding teams? Web site is www.DCRA.ca. Matches are the end of July and cover sniper team, pistol and service rifle. We are trying to make it a Storm Mountain/Armament Technolgy team. Come on guys. It'll be fun to watch us win every thing.

See ya.
Gooch <gooch@stormmountain.com>
Elk Garden, WV USA - Sunday, January 03, 1999 at 15:19:28 (EST) 


My .308 PSS has a badly pitted barrel from the factory. I think it was one of those where the parkerizing leaked into the bore. To make a long story short, I tried fire-lapping it and ruined it, which really doesn't bother me because I was thinking of re-barrelling it anyway.

Any advice on what barrel to choose? I'd like a 5R but that subject's been addressed already.
Greg in PA <gbras@ptd.net>
Palmyra, PA USA - Sunday, January 03, 1999 at 15:30:16 (EST) 


Gooch,
Whats required to get on your team for Canada and when is that match??? I would love to go to one of your classes but the distance is so great and with the extra expence of the Wife I can't make it this year. Will you be going back to the Wyoming shoot this year??
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Sunday, January 03, 1999 at 15:49:31 (EST) 
The weather in E. Central IL is so foul that I've been doing a bit of cruising. I've never posted to this list so hope it reads.

The CIL rifle that Terry is refering to is the CIL 950T. Unless I read it wrong, the owner of the CIL stated that it was a 950C. I wouldn't have a clue on that one. Very few 950T's were made for Canadian target shooting in the late 60's or early 70's. Jim Houlden was behind CIL offering this rifle at the time and I think he told me that only about 275 were made. In issue form I can state that it is a rare beastie. Most have been rebarreled or the club that was used for the "issue" stock was modified or replaced. The story was that two barrels were shipped with the rifles. One an Anschutz and the other a Savage. The reason that one of the barrels was never used was that it was chambered backwards. Don't anyone ask details on this because my ancient brain just doesn't recall.

There was mention by someone of going to the DCRA matches in August. This has been my annual vacation for going on twenty years. It is a highly recommended trip and the setting is one you won't soon forget.

As to the post on fitting the fastest twist barrel that will ever be necessary until rebarreling....This is excellent advice. It is very hard to overspin a GOOD bullet.

The 175 Sierra is an extrmemely good bullet. In my .308 Krieger 1 in 13" .298 - .3065 machine rest barrel, I've shot quite a lot of these bullets, mainly Federal .308M2, in a mid-production test about a year ago for federal. I don't recall the exact figures but the average was certainly under 1/2 minute at 500 yards. In two tests of ten rounds of handloaded ammunition, each test was exactly 1/4 minute
or 1 1/4". Very impressive!

Sorry for the rattle, but I'm snowed in.

The very best 1999 to all.

Bill Wylde <k9wxr@rr1.net>
IL USA - Sunday, January 03, 1999 at 17:45:21 (EST) 


Bill Wylde (aka Capt of the Redneck Rifle Team) is as good an AR15 'smith as you'll ever find. He is good and he is busy. Don't ask for anything to be delivered in the summer. He takes his trips to Ottawa very seriously.

The best story I can tell about Bill, old friend of friends of mine, is his 'ceramic barreled Model 700'. Stress cracks and all, he can almost outshoot anything else on the line.

The CIL 950C maybe a single shot varmint action. It may just be a magazine deer rifle. There was a time when the $C was better than the $US and gun makers sold a lot of guns into Canada.

Terry Warner <twarner@sk.sympatico.ca>
Canada - Sunday, January 03, 1999 at 19:59:58 (EST) 


Opinions on Leupold 25x50 compact spotting scope??????
Bolt <mbolt34547@aol.com>
USA - Sunday, January 03, 1999 at 21:37:25 (EST) 
Hello,

I have a question about the Savage 110 FP rifle and long-action rifles in general. Do any of you have any experience with these type of rifles jamming? I recently read a sniper's comment that unless the ammo is pushed all the way back in the magazine, long-action rifles tend to jam. Is this typical? I intend to purchase a rifle soon and want to know if I should consider a short-action rifle. Are these any better for that matter?

Thanks,

Marshal Childers
HavredeGrace, MD
Marshal Childers <mchild2@erols.com>
USA - Sunday, January 03, 1999 at 21:38:38 (EST) 


Marshall: my experience with the 110 fp is anything but Jamming. Usually the .223 is kind of finicky about feeding and that model is excellent compared to a short action Remington as far as getting jammed in the magazine. The .308's I've used were also excellent with the long action contributing to the ease of loading. I had no problems with it at all.
Bill Wylde; Old sport you have sunk to a new low hanging out around here with these outlaws! But we could sure use your advise! Sorry we missed snow out here it sounds like a ball. Good to hear from you again!
B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 01:35:04 (EST) 
I've decided purchase a spotting scope on the cheap side. I realize that you get what you pay for, but my Leupold Mk4 left me short of funds. My price range is $200-$250 and I've been considering Bushnell. I've seen the Spacemaster line and they look OK. The biggest drawback seems to be that they are not waterproof (I can't stalk with it during bad weather). The trophy model is in fact waterproof. If anyone's used any of these model I would appreciate feedback. I'm also curious if anyone come across a good deal in my price range. If anyone knows of another cheaply priced spotting scope that can get me through a years worth of crawling, let's hear about it. Thanks

Zero
Zero <zero@ntr.net>
Louisville, KY USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 02:56:47 (EST) 


A short time ago there was a Mil-Dot range estimation game somewhere in "snipercountry" where did it go, where can I find it? Thanks in advance for the help. I thought it was in somebodys homepage but I can't find it. Any new sources would also be appreciated.
shawn McNally <oneshot@page.az.net>
Page, AZ USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 03:13:53 (EST) 
Shawn,

I zaped the sim. to you. Enjoy. As far as I know the target is a 2 meter giant, and the round the M 118.

I also have another Swat game sim. that has a realy nice sniper trainer with dope book, Leupold Mk 4, etc., you need to manipulate the bolt to load, dial in your range, and can shoot paper, irons, and ballons, in the try out phase. In the swat team phase the brown stuff rally hits the fan.

Anyone else out there have this ?? Bought it here in Germany, was on sale, since its more of a think/ tactic type sim and not a "Rambo Tito" game.

"Ende"
Torsten <lasercon@dialup.globe.de>
G3ermany - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 04:29:08 (EST) 


Bolt:
You do not say if the Observer's Rifle is for a Law-Enforcement team or Military Sniper/Observer team.

In the Military the Sniper and Observer swap duties and rifles. With a Law Enforcement team there cxan be no swaping of rifles. The Liability factor is to great. The Law Enforcement Observer should have a rifle as capable as the primary sniper. This will allow the Observer to assume the roll of the sniper to releave the sniper if the situation starts to drag out. (Tests show the sniper's ability to exicute a precision shot after about 20 minutes of staring through the rifle scope begin to fall off.)

An AR-15 properly set up could fill in as an observer's rifle. The problems that can not be over come with a properly set-up AR-15 are the slinging of the brass, and the small caliber not being a very good glass penetrator.

Look at your needs and fit the equipment to that need.

Bruce G.Buell, NCDS
Senior Instructor, IDRC

Bruce <buellncds@mindspring.com>
Jacksonville, FL USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 11:13:46 (EST) 


"ACHTUNG !"

my contact at Special Air Sea Services just informed me that they have a small stock of OD open top drawstring Gore-Tex Bivi Bags in new condition for about 30 Pounds (+- 50$) each.

"Ende"
Torsten <lasercon@dialup.globe.de>
G3ermany - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 11:41:20 (EST) 


Torsten,

You mean the "Spotter confirms Center Hit" game? Great Fun for those blustery By-Gawd days of late.

Sat. 23:30 hrs rainy, sleeting, generally rotten out and heading for work I hit the crest of a ice glazed hill with about 100 feet of murky visibility and a deer gracefully hops the fence on my port side and begins to cross.
Not to worry, I carefully brake/ downshift and then as I smugly look on Three more come over the fence after him. Uhhhhh-Ohhhhh
Them Deers see me, freak, and start slipping and sliding in the middle of the road as I begin the slow motion powerslide ballet "Deer Lake"
I just regain control and they break left and begin to flop around running/falling down the hill in the same direction I was travelling. Somehow I made it through four deer spasming in a twenty foot wide road downhill backwards neither tagging a deer/s or sliding off the roadway. Allah, (I mean Bubba) be Praised!

And here you guys are whining about being "Stuck Inside" Waaaa! Good thing I did not stop at 7-11 for coffee Eh?

Stay warm and safe Dudes!

peteR
peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
cOLder tHeN dEPiTiEs sIdE oF tHe MouNTn, By-Gawd USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 12:13:07 (EST) 


Anybody know the physical differences between the .30 cal Hornady 180 A-MAX and the 178 NM A-MAX... (NM=National Match)
Pablito.
Paul "Pablito" Coburn <condor@mags.net>
USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 13:00:16 (EST) 
I have doubts about the benefits of a one turn elevation knob on rifle scopes. I am not now and have never been a sniper but I have used Swarovski sniper scopes with an elevation knob that took less than one turn. These scopes were fast to adjust but just the slightest movement of the elevation knob moved the point of impact by as much as 50 yards. I might be wrong but it seems to me that by using a scope like this instead of one that requires a liitle more turning on the elevation knob and has distinct clicks that you are trading precision for speed. Estimating range has some error already, by using an elevation knob like this I believe that you are adding more error into your shot. The one turn elevation knob seems to me like something for a sharpshooter and might be better mounted on a semi auto than a bolt action sniper rifle.
As I said I am a complete amateur at this so I might be wrong. Any comments from ex or current snipers? Thanks !!!

Kodiak <rvl@inil.com>
USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 13:41:24 (EST) 


Hope everyone here had good holidays. I will forever have a New Years Eve toast to a vet of two wars and a great shooter who passed away this year on New Years Eve, my father.

Jeff Cooper <loflyin@aol.com>
unnormally cold in, Tennessee USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 14:11:13 (EST) 



Kodiak...
You're comment... "These scopes were fast to adjust, but just the slightest movement of the elevation knob moved the point of impact by as much as 50 yards."... leaves me at a bit of a loss.
I will aknowledge that I've never used a Swarovski sniper scope, but the typical "one turn sniper scope" doesn't have 50 yards of adjustment from one end to the other... maybe 12-14 yards of total adjustment (at 1000 yards), so I can't understand how a "Slight movement" could yeld such a massive error. The real attraction of the one turn scope, besides it's speed, is that it impossable to loose count of the number of turns you've made while going from 100yds/mtrs to 1000yds/mtrs.
It's not the 1/4 clicks that are the problem (though some of the scopes are bad there), but the lines on the elevation barrel that you must count to to know how many turns you have made... multiply the turns by 12 or 15 to get those MOA, then to "add" to the readings on the knob. Even the famous MK-4, M1 turrets are a real bitch to read and keep track of while "looking" for your 670yd setting... and under stress, or poor lighting, the M4-M1 is useless in the field.
The only 1/4 minute scope that I would trust under stressful condx in the 10x B&L Tactical... the 1/4 knobs and lines on the turret barrel are really "Huge"!...and are easy to track.
But under stress, the one turn dials will beat the standard 1/4 scopes every time... the one turn scopes that I have, or have used, have sufficent friction, that they won't move unless you want them to.
And as been said here before by others... on a tactical scope, if your a 1/2 moa out, even at 1000yds it's nothing, on a 1/4" target scope, if you are one or two turns out, you're not in the game, and if you play for real, you are "out of the game" big time!.

Pablito.
Paul Pablito" Coburn <condor@mags.net>
USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 14:45:28 (EST) 


To Pablito:
I guess I worded my message wrong. What I meant was that for example if your scope is adjusted to 600 meters all you have to do is turn the elevation knob a few degrees of rotation and all of a sudden your point of impact is now at 650 meters. At very long distances when your bullet drop is the most severe this 50 meter difference means a lot.
The knobs on the Swarovski easily have enough friction to not turn by accident but because there are no clicks if you want to return to a certain adjustment you have to say to yourself "it was about here", and if you're off just a little there is a big difference in your point of impact.
Never having been a sniper I don't know how important speed really is. I'm interested in learning the pros and cons of the multi turn, click knobs vs the one turn, no click systems. Most of my shooting has been done on the bench so the real life side of rifle shooting is pretty new to me. I want to learn this art that is why I ask questions like this. I appreciate your response.
Kodiak <rvl@inil.com>
USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 16:27:11 (EST) 
Bolt! Don't SELL all your slings! Just don't use them to haul the rifle around aimlessly with. hmm..that was not good grammer was it? Anyway, a good sling can be used for position shooting. You needn't toss it out. My point was that (especially hunters and infantry types) you do not want to sling carry the rifle if you plan on actually taking game (or gomers). They too follow Murphy's law and will jump up the second you sling that rifle!

Drag bag: Depends on who you talk to. From what I understand some instructors hate them. If you get a good one, it can replace the ruck on short missions, but at the same time it'll weigh a ton. I used to prefer the simple drag bag that allows no more gear than a rifle and data books. I am currently reviewing a bag that allows you to carry spotting scope, tripod, maps, and other essentials I would have put in a ruck. It even straps on like a ruck but this high "stick" does present the problem of TARGET indicator. Probably not so much an issue in LE. The all purpose drag bag does have the advantage of always being with you, where as the temptation is to cache the ruck during a stalk. Anyway, the short of it is YES. It is taken on the mission.
Scott <xring@voicenet.com>
USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 17:12:46 (EST) 


Turrets: 1/4 moa versus 1 moa. Military does not need the same precision level as LE. A body hit serves equally well as a head shot. Mission is to remove other guy's troops from field of battle. Wounded or dead, either works. LE is better served by 1/4 moa. Far more precise. Example. My buddy was nailing the head on the 600 yard target repeatedly with his 1/4 moa turreted scope. I could just graze it or just go for body shots with my LR M3 with the 1 moa Elev and 1/2 moa wind. UNLESS I held off to split the difference. But REALISTICALLY, I would not have been trying for heads at 600 in a war zone and he would not have been shooting at 600 in an LE zone. Fit the tool for the mission. You can use a 1/4 moa in war, but you are at a disadvantage, just as you can use a BDC for LE plinking, but not to great advantage.
scott <xring>
USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 17:19:14 (EST) 
Ok, so you would try heads at 600 yards in a war zone if that is all you had! I was just making a point. The 1/4 is uneeded in the military.
Scott <xring>
USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 17:21:15 (EST) 
Gooch,
After getting out of the USAR, I missed the combat shooting that I did with the team. I am curious about CAFSAC, and your team. What kind of problems (if there would be any at all) would civilians experience, brining AR type semi auto rifles into Canada? I have been up there to shoot palma, but a single shot bolt gun is a different animal all together.In 93 I went to AFSAM in Australia, and I loved it. What are the dates?
Brian
B. Murphy
USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 17:25:00 (EST) 
Kodiak, I am not familiar with the Swarovski, but all of the one turn scopes I have seen had 1 minute clicks to 1000, or 1/4 minute clicks to 500. If the scope just had a friction adjustment and no position clicks I would steer clear of it.

Scott, please clarify...are you saying not to use a sling or not to use a carry strap? I actually find a sling rather helpful when shooting from unusual positions.

Zero, look through a bunch of scopes both cheap and expensive. You may find that the quality of the cheap scopes is such that you will be better served by saving the money up a little longer to get something of a little better quality.
Rich <dick2@clarkston.com>
WA USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 17:32:53 (EST) 


Does anyone know of a good (read "Cheap") source for a new B&L 10x Tactical... S.W.F.A has them for $895, and they're not known to be low price... would like to get one before the old stock dries up.
Pablito
Paul "Pablito" Coburn <condor@mags.net>
USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 17:32:56 (EST) 
pete R

jep, thats the one. " double tap to the head ....... Beeeep.... "

or the El Presidente Drill, what a joy. and you can really piss of the DI.

In the actuall game I never made it past the scene were I dumped old Grandma in the shower! Ouups !

"Ende"
Torsten <lasercon@dialup.globe.de>
G3ermany - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 17:40:34 (EST) 


Zero,

when checking the scopes, ask the salesguy to step outside with them as looking through a window will certainly not give you a clear picture.

time to feed the neighbours kittens........... to my 110 lb. bernese mountain dog
Torsten <ya know>
G3land - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 17:51:26 (EST) 


At a recent gun show, a guy was selling U.S. military smoke grenades and white parachute flares. Are these things legal to buy, i.e. does the military ever dispose of such items to civilians?

Bach Melick <tmelick@monbar.com>
New Orleans, LA USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 19:49:52 (EST) 


Jeff:

Sorry to hear of your loss. The kind words that you have posted about your father serve as a good memorial to an obviously honorable man.
Bruce Braxton <braxton1@aol.com>
College Park P.D., GA USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 19:54:01 (EST) 


Glasses

What do you'all do about them? Seems they're always fogging up (tried sea drops, spit, other antifog compounds) and they just give your position away. I am sure at least 3 deer this year clued in on my position by seeing them.

Are contacts a good option - there is the question about dirt getting in them on a sneak.

On the good side, I got to within 20 feet of a small doe while still hunting. At about 25 yards, she got curious and strolled in the rest of the way. Dead deer if I had been so inclined. (legal, just didn't want to).

If you can sneak up on a deer, you can sneak up on almost anything (except the Storm Mountain spotters)

Pat - sorry to hear about your wife. My brother-in-law had a marrow transplant for luekemia a bit over a year ago. They caught it early and he is recovering well.

Karl <dahm0030@tc.umn.edu>
Minneapolis, Mn USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 19:56:23 (EST) 


There is a thread to the conversation about shooting matches in Canada that I can help with. The DCRA matches in Ottawa are two components, the military championships, held in early Aug(?) and the civilian matches, held later in Aug. Both matches are open to all comers, except there are some aggregates and prizes open only to Canadians, like the Queen's Medal for Champion Shot, our service rifle highest accomplishment. At the military matches, there are pistol, precision rifle, light machine gun and misc. team and pairs matches.

The civilian matches are Palma stle lie-flat and hit the bullseye. There is a class for precision scoped bipod rifles, such as most listers' already own. The rifles are shot at the same target and on the same course of fire as the off-the-elbows target rifles.

The gun laws are not that complicated - yet. Essentially, bolt actions are no problems. Semi's are either Restricted and treated like handguns, or Prohibited and not allowed across the border. Handguns are not permitted for personal protection. Semi-auto magazines over 5-shot capacity are Prohibited Devices and don't get into the country. You'd better practice your mag changes mid-string. AR-15's and that ilk are Restricted. As long as you can prove you are going to a match, and it cannot go full auto, then you are allowed to bring it in. M1A's are not Restricted. M14's are Prohibited. Safe storage means disable the firearm with a lock. No particular limits on ammo.

The Canadian Department of Justice's Canadian Firearms Centre has a website. Be patient with them right now. They are trying to register every Canadian's firearms, and just can't get the software to behave. Deadline for that piece of genius is 2003.

However, the hospitality will be memorable. The beer is good. And the US$ is worth about C$1.50.

Terry Warner <twarner@sk.sympatico.ca>
Canada - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 20:27:44 (EST) 


Karl,

Glasses & contacts? Have you given it a thought to check into laser eye surgery? I just got it done in October and it is remarkable! I've had problems with contacts almost all my life ( Ok, I'm not as old as some of you are ) from infections to loosing them doing everything.
Funny how everyone will spend mega $ on good optics and never give their own eyes a thought. I know that things COULD go wrong with the surgery, but most of the problems that happen is when they don't fallow the Doctors orders.
One exam can tell you if you're good to go and how close to 20/20 you could get.
 

D. West <westforce@juno.com>
Still shoveling #*% snow, in IL. !!! USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 21:09:51 (EST) 


Jeff... I'm very sorry for your loss.
But think... the whole country will drink to him...
... every year.

The best to you and yours...
Pablito.
Paul "Pablito" Coburn <condor@mags.net>
USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 21:44:00 (EST) 


Jeff C,
My Condolences on your loss.
 
 

Pablito,

Gotta mount board with Berger 175 VLD, Sierra 175, Hornady 178 gr. National Match & 168 A-Max sitting atop my monitor. The A-Maxes got that red synthetic tip and the National Matches have a very curious tip ogive/meplat that kinda rounds over on the edges in a manner that I can only describe as similar to a .22 rimfire.
For a lack of better words the 178NM is more streamlined/elongated through the area between the body and meplat but appears to share the same angle for the boat tail as the A-Max. So far I've found they DO SHOOT in my limited testing over the past few months w/ Varget. Like I said a couple weeks ago, BAD TO THE BONE!
 
 

Anybody Else played with them yet? Pat(MRBULLET)? Jeff A.? Bill R?
 

peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
WARM INSIDE, bY-GaWd USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 22:11:22 (EST) 


does anyone know if the savage 110fp/.308 hold it own vs. the remington 700.
BUBBA <gl4ock0@erols.com>
fredericksburg, va USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 23:02:29 (EST) 
BUBBA... Only if you are comparing them as clubs, they're about equal (the Savage may have an edge...), but if you're comparing them as long range rifles, the Rem has it hands down
Pablito.
Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Monday, January 04, 1999 at 23:26:32 (EST) 
peteR: I've read your posts about the Hornady 178 NM bullets. I was curious about the weight of Varget you were using. I've noticed in all the reloading manuals they say to stay under 42.5 but I have been pushing it up to the 44.5 grain mark without any signs of pressure. I haven't been able to chronograph these loads. Anyone else experienced with upper weights of Varget? I'm still waiting for the 178 grainers from Hornady to get to my front door and then I will be able to put them through their paces. Any experienc with 4064 powder? How about with the 175 grain Sierra MKs. 4064 doesn't seem to be quite so forgiving as Varget.

Cold as your ex-wife's butt here in Ohio, and the white shit is still falling. Going to go bundle up to a perfect hourglass shaped body to keep me warm on this cold winter night. Just the thought of . . . oh fellas, - I gotta go!!!! Oooooooohhhhhh.

al
Al Ostapowicz <aaostapowicz@worldnet.att.net>
Shrunk up to the size of peas in blistering cold, Ohio USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 02:06:38 (EST) 


ON elevation clicks. Most of my scopes are 1/4 clicks and are used primarily for hunting at ranges from 100 to 600 yards. I am forever having to bore sight in the field to determine if I am back at zero caused by just loosing track of where I'm at. Late evening complicates the problem and usually the excitement of a shot complicates it. In combat it would be fatal. 1min clicks would suit me fine. Most my targets are less than 16" high. Another problem is turning it the wrong way by accident thus giving a reading that doesn't make sense. One then is plagued with the thought am I up or down? I have taken to shooting the vertical mil dots using the dot's rather than the cross hairs after finding out where (at what range) they hit. It is much quicker in a hunting situation than fooling with knobs. May not be cool but there's a bunch of dead coyotes that don't seem to care!
Actually the ability to estimate range is mighty important if your going to say you need 1/4 clicks I probably can dial as close with a 1" turrent thaan I can estimate anyway.
B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 02:44:16 (EST) 
Will A: Sorry for the delay but for some reason I could not send to you. Message sat on my COMP for days. Glad you finaly got it.

1 MOA clicks: Refer to what Rick had to say about them a while back. They are so much easier to use and far more grunt proof than the 1/4 clicks. And even at 600m you will only be 3.3" off one way or the other max. Wind and weather throw me off more than that on the first shot of the day (course I use Gods own rangefinder). As far as the scopes go, my greatest experience is with the M3's and I have found some that were very mushy and others that clicked right nicely.

Drag Bags: The smaller and lighter the better. I personally have a love/hate relationship with them. I love them on a classic stalk, like in a school situation. So much easier to crawl. Real world though I DO NOT like having my rifle in a bag. Then there is the spotter who has an M203, there is the 25lb radio, batteries, binos, NODs, spotter scope, MELIOS, and other ass't, but all important crap (like 5.56mm, 40mm, grenades, smoke, claymore, and the LBV that it hangs off, etc...) I have an small ruck that I g'd up just to tote around some of that junk on a stalk. Hell, I often think that the ghillie itself is a viscious joke that the Scotts have been laughing hystericaly about behind their kilts since WWI. But that is another piece of heresy for another day.
Ed Engler <Ed_Engler@softhome.net>
CP Greaves, ROK - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 05:19:24 (EST) 


aL oOOOOOOoooooHHHHHHHhhhhhhhhhh!,(AAAAAAaaaahhhhhh?)
 

I'm at 44.0 grains of Varget with just about everything under the sun in .308. I carefully worked up, as you did, with all projectiles and at 44.0 gr. my rifle just seems at its best.
With the 178 gr. National Matches I'm just begining to seem a very slight amount of flattening of the primers (at 85degrees F) and the groups seem pretty good considering my often spastic ability.
I use the same charge weight with the Sierra 175's and am getting real good results for a non 5-R factory barrel out to 200 yards which is the max. available to me.

Other powders are not a consideration to me at this time, Varget is less temp. sensitive and meters great through my geriatric uniflo. If you have not hit their web page (via Links page) do so and look at the testing they did with regards to temp and pressures. Great Stuff.

If I do go to another powder it will be VihtaVuori N-500/550 series its the only possible alternative according to my research. Coffees up time to go!

peteR
 

peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
YAWN-CITY, bY-GaWd USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 09:14:28 (EST) 


Ed. loved your comment... Hell, I often think
that the ghillie itself is a viscious joke that the Scotts have been laughing hystericaly about behind their kilts since WWI. But that is another piece of heresy for another day."
'specially when, with a $300 doller IR viewer, they stand out like a Ho-Jo's on an interstate.
Pablito.
Paul "Pablito" Coburn <condor@mags.net>
USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 09:20:07 (EST) 
Kodiak,
If you stay 600yds or under the 1/4 Min clicks are fine but if you shoot past 600 yards you start doing a lot of clicking to get out where you need to be. The biggest avantage to the "One turn" scope is when you have to engage multiple targets at unknown ranges with some being in the 300 to 400yd range then have one out there at 800 or 1000yds then back to 450yds. When you get done spinning the dial you wont know where your at then put yourself under pressure after running for a mile or two over rough terrain in 100defree heat and....OOPs sorry I was having a Wyoming flash back...Seriously that course is the best proving ground for what works in a tactical situation because you engage targets at unknown ranges fromm 300 to plus 1000yds and there not big either!! The M3 LR paid for itself out there and made a believer out of me.

Jeff A,
The "FAT BARRELL" is headed home!!! Just talked to the smith last night. Now if it would just get above "0" so I could shoot it.I got some more loading data from Hornady for the 260 drop me your address and I'll send it to you.
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 09:31:33 (EST) 


ACHTUNG !

I will be at the Shot Show in Atlanta, and some of you have already mailed me that you can make it there as well. What about a get together ? We could hit a Steak House or something and BS a little.

I´ll impact in Atlanta on Saturday 30th around 18:00 and eject again on Thursday 4th at 21:00.

Any takers ?

"ENDE"
Torsten <lasercon@dialup.globe.de>
G3ermany - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 10:58:29 (EST) 


Re: Ghillies, It might help to remember tat the ghillie was used by the GAME WARDENS to interdict poachers and was primarily used in a static position. That being said.....the military used it in a different manner and some parts of the military have overdone it. If possible get some of the military camo netting and try working just with it. It's lighter and even though its not the "thing" for everywhere, it can help.

Have "max'd" out at 45 grs Varget with 168 and 175 moly'd Sierras. 'Course both barrels and chambers are a bit "tight" so that load works for me. In another shooters Rem 308PSS, we have found that 43.7 gives him the accuracy out to 500. Whatever works for you !!

I like Torstens idea for the SHOT show, IF he comes through for me(hint hint)!!! I'll be in Atlanta on the 1st mid-day, Copy that JEFF ?? Long enough post, need to make another pot of coffee 'fore i head to the woods. ONLY 28 degrees here in SUNNY AL !!!
OUT HERE !!
Will <willadams@mindspring.com>
USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 13:40:16 (EST) 


Is there a good mail-order source for optics, Badger Ordnance rings, etc.? Thanks
Stroker <nitaikoruna@worldnet.att.net>
LaCrosse, FL USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 13:40:30 (EST) 
Dick, I was saying don't use a sling FOR a carry strap. Use it only for position shooting and not to haul the rifle with. that help?
Scott <xring>
USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 16:41:31 (EST) 
Jeff: Sorry to here about your father. I've been there; 10 years ago and I still think about him everyday. So will you - I'm sure!

D.West: Yes, Mr. West. I did get my Mil-Dot Master from Santa, but he got a little miffed when I took a crack a Rudolf on Christmas eve. Guess he won't be coming back here next year - that fat little bastard.

Torsten: Good luck getting around in Atlanta. You will find out real quick that Atlanta ain't Deutschland. Come up north a little "und ich habe gute deutsche bier!" Ja! Ja! I'll keep it warm for you, just like they do in Dusseldorf und Hamburg.

Will: 43.7 sound like a good compromise on the Varget powder. Still a littl eunsure about the 4064 and pushing it past published Sierra limits.

peteR: Last night the AAAAAAAaaaahhhhhhhh was not a question. If was a statement of fact - if you follow my drift.

Thanks to all with the help about the powder. And Sarge!! Where the hell have you been hiding.

al o. ( Just so nobody confuses me with al b. in the Big Apple.)
Al Ostapowicz <aaostapowicz@worldnet.att.net>
Everything is frozen up here in -2 degree , Ohio USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 16:42:32 (EST) 


RE: SHOT Show/Atlanta

We Atlantans need to designate a social coordinator for this event, i.e., someone who can coordinate when to get together for the Sniper Dinner, and hotels.

If it is warranted, I could work with some of the Hotels in the College Park (ATL Airport) area to see if we can get you guys a good rate. Let me know.

If we can get enough folks, I could probably arrange a reception room for a social one night. The only night that I am gonna be tied up is the night of the Glock reception...

RE: Savage vs. Remington

Triggers: Savage sucks...End of Statement. Even with the adjustability, it is difficult to get a Savage trigger close to a Remington that is properly adjusted.

Barrels: They vary in both guns. So far, one of the best shooting guns that I have shot was a 110FP in 7 Rem. Mag. 3/4 inches at 200!

But, I have found both brands to be very individualistic. Each individual gun has a different personality. I have shot good Savages, and bad ones. Same with the Remington.

Later,

Bruce
Bruce Braxton <braxton1@aol.com>
College Park P.D., GA USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 17:09:06 (EST) 


Bach...

"At a recent gun show, a guy was selling U.S. military smoke grenades and white parachute flares. Are these things legal to buy, i.e. does the military ever dispose of such items to civilians?"

Yes they are legal to own, but check your local laws... most don't care but places like New York City might not like it.

The military disposes of these types of articals by "DATE"!
After a date (like milk) they are sold at auction... to business' and
individuals.
Pablito.
Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 17:36:02 (EST) 


Hello, everyone, just checking in.

The Stoner is still working well after about 600 rounds. I've been warned by people here that they've been known to develop wandering zero problems by now, but no sign of that yet (knock on wood). One of the guys at work has bought himself a SR-25 and one of Leupold's new long-distance scopes, but I haven't talked him into coming out to the tactical rifle match yet. (See "Sacramento Snipers" article.)

I came in first place in December's match, the second time I've done that. In January's, we had fog to where you couldn't see the berm from the 200-yard line. We put up half-sized sillhouettes and moved the firing line back and forth to positions where we could barely make out the targets. The B&L Tactical scope worked well, sometimes getting off aimed shots when others couldn't tell the targets were there. I cross-shot on one target and came up 5 points short of first place, drat.

We have a real-live military sniper from an Army Rangers unit who has shown up at our match the last 3 months. He claims to have been on active duty in Somalia and Bosnia.

I ordered a drag bag/shooting mat from Eagle Industries. After I was told it was out of stock and would take a month and a half to arrive, the darn thing showed up on my doorstep a week later. I am thoroughly delighted with the design and workmanship of this case, thanks for the recommendations from Sniper Country. The Stoner is a tight fit, but the end result is much easier to handle than the factory case. I can't wait to put it to field use.

Tactical Firearms Training Team (http://www.tftt.com) will be holding a 3-day optical rifle course at the Sacramento range the last weekend in February, including camoflauge and stalking. Drop me a note if you're interested.
Grasshopper <wd6cmu@netcom.com>
Richmond, CA USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 17:47:13 (EST) 


This subject has been covered in this column but I do not have hours of free time to comb through the archives. Please give all problems assciated with Springfield scopes. All I am looking for are short answers that are to the point!!!!!
JimC <joe.largy@wang.com>
Billerica, ma USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 18:02:26 (EST) 
I've been reading the Remington/Savage posts and decided to add the results of some testing over the holidays. The Savage was a short action Tatical in .223, new out of the box, and the PSS was very slightly used .223. 30 shots using three powders and a 52 gr Seirra match averaged .61 in the Savage and 20 shots averaged .53 in the PSS.
(Try dividing the accuracy difference into the price difference?)The Savage was cleaned between groups and 1 fouling shot fired. Accuracy wise the Savage is hard to beat for the money,IF you're looking only for an everyday gun with good accuracy. The accuracy difference alone alone was nominal and at least partially the result of the heavy trigger in the Savage. Workmanship, trigger, after market stuff, etc. all favor Remington. So it seems to me that if you want to shoot it "as is" the Tactical is a good buy and you could put the money in the scope. If you want to add on, customize, etc. (basic issue gun nut) consider the PSS and the extra cost. The .300 Win Mag Tactical we tested also shot very well and averaged around an inch with hunting bullets and a shooter shooting his first magnum. The conclusion was "they ain't elegant or fancy but they will shoot!" Woe be it to the prairie dog, elk, or bad guy in the cross hairs if the shooter does his part. We all have our priorities, perspectives, and budgets, but the Tacticals seem to be a good option.

Barry Chance <Barry_Chance@maxtor.com>
Longmont, CO USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 18:52:30 (EST) 


Fantastic site, I visit often. Has anyone out there heard of bedding the first 1 3/4 inches of the underside of the barrel on a sniper rifle? The U.S. Marines do this on their M40A1's as well as the folks at Texas Brigade Armory. They call it a barrel pad. Mike Lau says in his book that this is done because the Remington Action can flex a few thousands because of the weight of a heavy barrel. I was told by a friend in the USMC that Remington actually did a test long ago and found that they acheived the best accuracy from the M40A1's when bedding the first 1 3/4" of the barrel. I am currently building up a rifle with a McMillan stock and I'm considering having it bedded this way. I'm a little worried about barrel harmonics since I've previously read that nothing should touch any part of the barrel.

Speaking of bedding, has anyone used marine tex to bed a stock before? McMillan uses the stuff exclusively and so does the USMC.
Any comments would be welcome.

Thanks and sorry for the long post.
Pat <Autothority@Erols.com>
Ashburn, VA USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 19:16:42 (EST) 


FYI to those interested in a PSS. Ebay.com has two new in box PSS's for sale. One is currently at $635 and one is at $650. Go to Ebay.com and search under "PSS".

Bolt <mbolt34547@aol.com>
USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 20:54:43 (EST) 


Hi Guys! Been kind of busy lately, developing a moly-coated drag bag.
Paul J. Headlee <pheadlee@networksplus.net>
Ogden, KS USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 23:00:16 (EST) 
A pet load of mine is FED GM 308 case, FED 210M primer, 44.6 IMR 4064, 168 Berger VLD moly, OAL of 2.8410. Out of a stock 20" REM 700 mountain rifle barrel I get 3/4 MOA at 2635fps. +/- 7fps. Out of a 24" match grade Krieger barrel I get 1/2 or better MOA at 2710 +/- 10fps. All components have been uniformed, trimmed, and weighted. Velocities are averages of averages chronographed mostly at temps of 75 degrees below 500 feet. Rounds have only been fired to 300 yds but appear to be consistent. I asked previously if anyone has played with 30-378 WBY loads. I've tried H1000, RL22 and IMR7828 all with 180 gr Nosler silver tips and FED 215M primers. Best group (5/8") is with 7828. Has anybody used 50BMG? Since this is special order and only comes in 5lb containers I don't want to waste time and money. The rifle is not a stock WBY. Its a MarkV action with a canjar trigger and a 27" heavy Shilen match grade barrel with fluting and brake, bedded in a McMillan McHale stock with US Optics scope, rings and mount. Weight is about 13-14 lbs. Thanks..Tony
Tony Y.
Iselin, NJ USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 23:05:54 (EST) 
I am looking for any information on any studies on shooting of weapons out of the hands of a suspect....any actual incidents, studies, etc. I plan to do a research project regarding this type of activity to better educate the L.E. community on the pro's and con's of this type of situation.....thanks
C.Donn Swanbom II <swanbom@aol.com>
USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 23:20:34 (EST) 
Gentleman,

I'm looking for info on mil. surplus ammo cal. 30-06 headstamped FN 58 bullet weight, vel., corrosive or not any help would be great.
Daniel <hinesd@gators.net>
Lacrosse, FL USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 23:28:10 (EST) 



Re: Weaver cold weather test

Last night I put an AR-15 with a Weaver KT-15 scope in the backyard for a good cold soak. This morning it was minus 4° F. and provide a good test of the AR (lubed with LSA) and scope. The rifle worked fine, but the Weaver didn't care for the cold. The normally usable clicks were non-existent. Couldn't feel or hear anything. How do the better Leupolds hold up in "brisk" weather?
Food for thought.

Once someone commented that the Weaver KTs have a spring type vibration in them upon impact or firing a shot. He was correct. Don't know if it matters though. I had never noticed it on an AR-15 which is prone to the action spring noise and vibration.

Ron N. <rcn8@accnorwalk.com>
USA - Tuesday, January 05, 1999 at 23:44:54 (EST) 


Happy New Year everyone!

Been out for a while, New Years eve was pretty rough, but I stopped by for a look see on what I've been missing.

Mike from Cal,

An H-S stock is foam filled, it's a urethane foam with milled fiberglass mix, and is surrounded by a layer of graphite, kevlar, and laminated fiberglass, which is then coated with another urethane shell. Now to install your own cheek piece, whether or not you are qualified, would break my heart as I probably made the damn thing depending on how long ago you got it. Plus inside that foam is an aluminum bedding block which goes from forend past the palmswell clear into the butt, probably a couple inches shy of the recoil pad. I have made the adjustable stocks, cheek piece and LOP, and we use aluminum inserts to hold everything in place inside the stock, AND we have to trim the bedding block so everything will fit. Now if I was going to spend the time and money on an adjustable stock, I'd just call H-S and order one. Take it easy everybody.
 

JR <mrpink@rapidnet.com>
Rapid City, SD USA - Wednesday, January 06, 1999 at 01:04:46 (EST) 


Tony Y,
Although I'm sure that I'm not the only one here, but I've played around some with a L.A.R. 50.BMG single-shot. What do ya want to know? For a 30/378, check with Russ Taylor.

Al O.
Ok, I forgot to add the "O" to your name. You never can tell when Al B. might be lurking around the Roster, but ya gotta love-em!
 

D. West
USA - Wednesday, January 06, 1999 at 05:36:58 (EST) 


Pat,
There are several schools of thought on bedding actions. Some bed out under the barrel and some don't. I like to bed under the barrel for an inch or two with the heavy barrel's because I believe that the heavy barrel can put a bind on the action. I also only bed the recoil lug area and the rear tang some people bed the entire action. I leave the area between the front of the action and the tang "Free floated" and this is a lot the same way an action is when its pillar bedded. It sets on the area of bedding at the screws and the rest of the action is not touching anything. I have found no difference in accuracy doing it one way or the other with a pad or with out a pad. I think if you have a good job of bedding and you have a good rifle it will shoot better than most of us can hold it. The Marine Tex is very good bedding materal bu expensive. Devcon Plastic steel works just as well. Hope this helps to answer your question there probably isn't a right or wrong just what ever you smith perfers. Maybe Ron can give you a better answer.
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Wednesday, January 06, 1999 at 09:33:08 (EST) 
Swanborn II, There was an incident a couple of years ago that was discussed here where a police man took out a gun. It was the contention here (to save scouring archives) that it was a bad precident given the fact that future lawyers would probably adopt the idea and question LE snipers who did not attempt to shoot the weapon. I personally think that is well founded in good thought. There might be a senerio where that would be an option but probably as an established procedure it sucks!
Pat: I do attempt to bed a couple inches ahead of the lug for the reasons Pat Bullet gave you! but I must say it is almost impossible to tell the difference given that other factors have so much bearing.
I do one thing a little different though. Mr. Bullet seems to bed first whereas I do everything else I can do to stabilize the system before I bed it. I frankly don't know which way is best. I'm sure that Pat's method is faster and results in a good shooting gun quicker than mine. Often I do things that are nullified by the bedding later so it would be hard to argue my method is correct except that I hopefully might find some unknown problem that might indeed be hidden and reduced by the bedding process to the point I wouldn't know about it.
Ron N. that's very commendable you would test you equipment before finding out the hard way.(as I usually do) I think you will find the Leupolds are quite good in cold weather. I have never experienced anything except a little tightness on VarX II models(no clicks on it).
VarX III units I've had are not affected normally except for fogging on the outside.
B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Wednesday, January 06, 1999 at 10:48:28 (EST) 
To: Barry Chance

I agree on most of the points you make regarding Savage rifles.

When I ordered my 112FV .223 I did so because the rifle was very affordable,reasonably accurate, and because I wanted a faster twist rate (Savage has 1/9 twist) than what other manufactures were offering (example,Remington has 1/12 twist) so that I can shoot heavier .224 cal bullet weights.

You are correct that the Remington has the advantage when it comes to overall selection when it comes to aftermarket products.However,this situation is changing.More and more suppliers are producing aftermarket goodies for the Savages and the prices are comparable to what you would pay for other rifles such as Remington.

I certainly wouldn't buy a Savage with the intention on upgrading the overall rifle to the quality of a PSS.Heck,I'd just buy a PSS and be done with it even if it didn't have the twist rate I wanted.

But on the other hand if I was interested in building a rifle with the intention on customizing it I would personally would want to start out with the most economical barrel/action that was of acceptable accuracy potential.In other words, I wouldn't buy a PSS over a Savage to do this.Unless of course I wanted a Remington in the first place (been there, done that) in which case I'd probably buy a Varmint Special with laminate stock.

Just some food for thought.

To:Ron N.

Ron, did you notice any accuracy difference when the rifle was that cold ? If so,approximately how much? Good point about the scope being finicky about the cold.I think I'll try that myself.
Jeff Babineau <2jeff@blaikies.ns.ca>
Truro, N.S. Canada - Wednesday, January 06, 1999 at 11:04:23 (EST) 


JR, glad to see you commenting here!

By the way, I believe H.S. now offers to upgrade the standard PSS stock with the new adjustable cheek rest for around $100. This would certainly be worth it for those who want a higher rest but do not want to 100mph tape a pad to the rifle. Also, the factory job will obviously be very well done when compared to some "home brew" solutions. Just thought I'd past this on.

JR, thanks again for the low down on the HS construction.
Scott <xring@voicenet.com>
USA - Wednesday, January 06, 1999 at 11:36:16 (EST) 


We just saw the results of cold weather on sight clicks. What can we learn from other's experiences shooting in very cold weather.

We know cold air (that is not 'thin wind') is denser. What effect does this have on ballistics? Sea level performance in the summer is one thing, what about the depths of winter?

From the scope test, we know springs and lubes behave slower in the cold. What effect does this have on rifles? Are there any rifles that won't work in the cold - semi autos, high spec' rifles?

We know fingers and muscles dislike the cold. What is the effect on the shooter?

Finally, condensation from breathing will fog eyepieces (know this from experience). What can be done to avoid this?

Terry Warner <twarner@sk.sympatico.ca>
minus 36 degrees with a slight breeze, Canada - Thursday, January 07, 1999 at 09:08:05 (EST) 


Barry Chance,

A most excellence post dude!

But,

I believe the bretheren is interested in first round accuracy w/o fouling shots. If you discount the first round fired, you're only fooling yourself. What is most often called a Cold Barrel Shot and it can't be "Bogus" in the real world.

What was the deviation from the intended point of impact for Remington vs. Savage?

Maybe a repeat test without cleaning the barrel between strings, or fouling shots could provide more most excellent enlightenment to all of us.

Shoot what you got, and shoot it (precisely) lots.

Paul H, Moly Coated DRAG BAG! DUUUDEEEE! Where can I get One!
 

peteR
peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
tHAwING-oUT cItY, bY-gAWd USA - Thursday, January 07, 1999 at 09:37:16 (EST) 


Fogging on Scope lenses:

A few winters ago we had it as bad as you now, with temps in -20°C. I had my breath, or just the condensation of my body forming ice flowers on the lens during a hunting trip.

My quick fix was one of my long socks into which I slipped one of those small heat bags for warm toes. I tied the sock in an O and used it as a lens cover with the warm toaster bag in the rear.
Presto, warm objective, and no more condensation.
This year, if it ever gets cold, I try just taping the bag to the outside of the objective, may warm the lens that way?

Try it and tell me about it, but dont heat up the lens to quick or it may fracture.

"ENDE"
Torsten <lasercon@dialup.globe.de>
G3ermany - Thursday, January 07, 1999 at 09:40:16 (EST) 


Terry - On eyepiece/scopes fogging up (external). Here is what I came up with when attending the Army course in January.

1. Use RainX anti-fog on the eyepiece and Regular RainX on the objective.
2. Avoid a wide brimmed hat and thick ghillie veil. Just the heat from your head can fog up the eyepiece.
3. Breath out your nose as much as possible. It directs the hot moist air from your lungs away from the scope.
4. Try to avoid moving the weapon from warm indoors to cold outdoors a lot. In the Marines we used to try to use a cold room to store weapons in cold weather to keep condensation down. When living in an arctic tent with a yukon stove or such, keep weapons behind the frost liner if the tent has one.

Weapons operation in the cold. Its more of a lubrication thing than anything else. For semi-auto's use 3-in-one oil, with bolt guns white lithium grease has worked for me. Moly lube?

We are in the short strokes on the data book.

Later

gooch <gooch@stormmountain.com>
Elk Garden, WV USA - Thursday, January 07, 1999 at 10:00:15 (EST) 


Gooch I learned something from your Rain Ex post. Fogging is not much of a problem here. Just the Surf Board dust. I have got to find a good sweat shop to make the slings my hands hurt like hell from this sewing. Next it will be dishpan hands.

Well off to shoot my Rifle and see if I should be using Varget instead of the 4064 I have been using for years. Varget is alot eaiser to measure for sure.

I'm back to using non Molly in my sniper rifle. First round from a clean bbl is to erratic for me. I have heard about leaving a fouling shot but that just rubs the grain the wrong way to leave a rifle dirty.

To who asked about Marine Tex and who said it was expensive. It is a great bedding compound and cost $6.00 for 1/2 pint in Calif. That seems cheap to me. You can do alot of rifles with 1/2 pint. A quart is $13.00 and that will go bad before it is used. Mike
Mike M. <DMMDNLN@AOL.COM>
Calif USA - Thursday, January 07, 1999 at 11:33:52 (EST) 


PeteR,
Thanks, you're correct first round shots are essential. Unfortunately, I was breaking in the barrel and haven't got around to really understanding this rifle yet. The one round fouling shots were after cleaning and all on a different target and grouped well. I didn't transpose them over the test targets to see where they actually grouped as far as first round zero. I will do that on my next range visit. My first round zeros tend to vary a lot from rifle to rifle. My 40x's are very consistent. One interesting thing which I didn't realize until too late is when I retested some loads another day I didn't have the same zero!(?) I don't think it was the wind or mirage because it was fairly calm and only 100yds. So now I have two things to check out, first shot zero, and the ability to maintain it day to day. Damn, if I just didn't have this real job that interfered with the important stuff.
Barry Chance <Barry_Chance@maxtor.com>
Longmont, Co USA - Thursday, January 07, 1999 at 11:39:53 (EST) 
To All: Those of you that subscribe to either "Precision Shooting" or "Tactical Shooter" may have noticed an announcement recently that the noted artist Lee Teter (famous for the painting of a veteran at the Wall entitled "Reflections") had done a painting of Carlos Hathcock and that it was to be available in a limited edition print. Upon calling the art studio that was to handle them, I learned the print effort has been shelved by the artist for now due to criticism of some aspects of the painting.

I am asking that any of you out there who may be interested in one of these prints please phone Wayne Stallings at the Imagine Art Studio in Smithville, VA (1-800-303-9003) and express your desire that Lee Teter reconsider his position and press forward with this artwork.

I believe the final view of what is correct in the painting should be determined by the artist, Carlos, and his son Carlos III. For those of us that respect and honor this man, the opportunity to purchase a quality print of him as he would choose to be remembered should not be compromised by anyones "commitee" of critics.

Hopefully most of you will agree and we can get Lee to complete the work for printing.
Fred Fischer <frederick_c_fischer@mail.northgrum.com>
People's Rep. of, MD USA - Thursday, January 07, 1999 at 13:10:23 (EST)


Mike M: Your comments re: MarineTex were right on target. This is an outstanding product that has incredible versatility. I would not hesitate to use it for bedding compound on actions, pillars, etc. The only limiting factor for it in some areas is the high viscosity and its thixotropic (ability to retain form in an uncured state) nature. This can make it difficult to flow and eliminate air pockets depending on where it is applied. It can be filled with powdered metal additives if desired, drilled, filed, sanded, etc. Besides that, it is reasonably priced and available in virtually any marine supply store. Great stuff. Great tip.
Fred Fischer
People's Rep. of, MD USA - Thursday, January 07, 1999 at 13:29:03 (EST) 
Just got in my Starlight case (O.D. Green) this AM. The case looks bomb-proof !! I am NOT going to see how much intentional abuse it can take as Sarge did but it will get a work out. Plenty of room for TWO rifles if you think about the layout BUT I am going to keep just ONE rifle, One Leupold spotting scope, 8x30 Steiners binocs, range book,and a small cleaning kit (also a Leatherman tool) inside and then "toss" it into the back of my '64 Chevy stepside truck!! Oh yeah, will see if I can fit 100 rds in there somewhere. The inner construction is smart....eggshell foam on top (glued-in) and FOUR pieces of foam, 2 of differing thicknesses to mix & match ....while I didn't get a knife with my case ,I did use one of the many knives my wife says I have too much of!! Yeah, Riiiight !!!! How can a guy have too many knives or rifles ?? So far have just set in the Rem 700V and its Leupold 4.5x14 TActical (early version)....will keep all updated. So far it is THE BEST DEAL GOING for a rifle case As far as any I have seen.
Thanks, Brack...keep up the good work !! See you at the SHOT Show !!
OUT HERE
Will <willadams@mindspring.com>
Sweet Home, ALABAMA USA - Thursday, January 07, 1999 at 16:44:53 (EST) 
Log onto this and cast your vote. Another CNN / HCI Gun Control Opinion Poll

http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/1998/guns/overview/

J.D.
J.D. Hicks <hicks@zso.dec.com>
Seattle, WA USA - Thursday, January 07, 1999 at 17:20:08 (EST) 


Just cast my vote on the CNN site. If you have trouble getting in, shorten the address to end with "specials".

There may be hope for the American people yet (at least those with internet access). The question was, "Should gun manufacturers be held liable .....etc."

When I voted, the vote results came up as follows:

Total Votes: 14736
Yes votes: 1197 (8%)
No Votes: 12950 (88%)
Sometimes: 598 (4%)

Cast your vote!
Bruce N. Robinson <bnrobins@flash.net>
Los Lunas, NM USA - Thursday, January 07, 1999 at 18:07:46 (EST) 


What surprises me even more - how can someone in their right mind even consider blaming gun manufacturers for injuries, etc - in the first place.... Come on folks, get it together.... (not you folks, those other wackos).

Ken :)

NoVaShooter <Ken@aspire.net>
Nokesville, Va USA - Thursday, January 07, 1999 at 18:32:28 (EST) 


A little help please. What's the story on Turret Tagz? I read one entry in "Hot Tips and Cold Shots" about them but could not find anything else about them on this website. Thanks in advance for the response.

CG
Curious George
emerald, WA USA - Thursday, January 07, 1999 at 18:34:51 (EST) 


I am a thirteen year old shooter. I am interested in being a sniper when I get older. I guess I'm a pretty good shot, I can do a two-inch grouping from 100 yards. I own a .243 and help my dad reload bullets. I clean the pirmer pockets and have made my own set of match bullets before. I guess that all my teachers would think I was wierd if I said that I wanted to be a sniper but that's what I want to do. I enjoy reading a lot of things about snipers and I own the movie Sniper which I watch about nine million times a day. If you have any interesting information please E-mail it to me.
Big Sniper <wofmagazine@juno.com>
Ninety Six, SC USA - Thursday, January 07, 1999 at 18:59:50 (EST) 
How is a Savage 12BVSS in 308 ?
Bob Fontano Member M.C.L. Sunrise Rifle team <Bggun1775@aol .comN.>
islipterrace , N.Y. USA - Thursday, January 07, 1999 at 19:19:14 (EST) 
Hey out there I just have a simple question that Im sure one of you shooting geniuses out there will know right off. I shoot a stock Rem. 700 VS in .308, the trigger out of the box sucks. My AR's have as good. It almost seems as if it is a single stage trigger, is this the case? Can I adjust the lengh of pull to get a true
.308 gunner <CGarr23113@aol.com>
somewhere, Ca USA - Thursday, January 07, 1999 at 21:21:51 (EST) 
In addition to previous message. Can I adjust this trigger myself with my somewhat average gunsmithing skills to be a true "two stage" trigger? If so what is the procedure and what is requirded? Any help will be greatly appreciated.
.308 gunner <CGarr23113@aol.com>
somewhere, Ca USA - Thursday, January 07, 1999 at 21:28:23 (EST) 
Well Big Sniper; Your probably going to get a lecture from one of the board members that operate this site about the fact that you seem to have ignored the warning about being 18 years of age to enter here. Now that is none of my business since I'm not involved in the management of the site and quite honestly I don't like it all that it is politically incorrect for an Old Geezer like me to encourage you in something that might result in your taking someone's life with a rifle. I find it commendable that you and your dad are involved in shooting and are interested in the art of making a bullet go where you want it too. There are many misguided kids in this country that are trying to do the same thing for the purpose of conducting gang warfare and I trust that is not your case. Your are quite correct to assume that your teachers will think it unusual to the point you would probably be recommended for counseling should you let it be known that you watch "Sniper" over and over. Now my friend I want you to know that I do not. But you do realize that society is not made up of folk like me. One of the best traits of a Sniper is that he is a bit on the Covert (secret) side about what he does and he doesn't brag it around. Sniping involves a lot of things that Hollywood doesn't tell you. I'm not going to lecture you but your interest may change when you find out the whole truth. It is really quite boring most of the time and very uncomfortable all the time followed by a period of shear terror after the shot. Did it go right? Will I be discovered and wiped out? Will I be prosecuted? Did I kill the hostage? You may be called upon to risk your life and most likely will never receive as much as a thank you. Remember the Mission impossible thing? If you get caught they don't know you! If your in Law Enforcement and you make a mistake they don't know you either!
The moral here my friend is "Be careful what you wish for...Cause you might get it." On the other hand enjoy your rifle and stay close to your dad! This is the best time of your life. Keep on shooting and learning and if it is a Sniper you be you will know it! A real good Sniper would not have MISSED that thing about being 18 years old though! Good Luck and what ever you do! Do it with honor and commitment to Freedom and right and you will be successful and happy.
IF things get too heavy though mail us off line and we'll try to help!
B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Thursday, January 07, 1999 at 21:48:15 (EST) 
Big Sniper, AKA (under 18 years old)

There's a article here at Sniper Country just for you.
Click onto (ARTICLES AND COMMENTARY)
Then click on (COMMENTARY)
Now click on (SO YOU WANT TO BE A SNIPER)

It's not going to taste too good, but it's what you're looking for.
And for God's sake, stay in school!!!
D. West <westforce@juno.com>
Oh, so cold here, in IL. USA - Thursday, January 07, 1999 at 22:10:29 (EST) 


.308 GUNNER,

i GOT KINDA CONFUSED wITH tHE DOUBLE POST, AIN'T NONE OF US GENIUSES, JUST HUNTERS N' SHOOTERS SHARING COLLECTIVE WISDOM AND EXPERIENCES GATHERED IN THE FIELD, DUDE!

un-DUDE: Once you get "Varget'ed", I doubt you'll go back, EVER!
Sweatshops, HA! Gooch has got to have plenty of free time on his hands, and everybody knows West Virginians are good at manual labor! That banjo plucking toughens the fingers FAST.

Barry, Go!-Baby!-Go! Now you're tracking that Cold Barrel Shot!
 

Jeff A,
Bubba get you? You been cooped up with Babs again? Got any of the Hornady 178's yet? ANSWER ME!!!

Pat(MrBullet) ibid Hornady 178's? pLEASE?

X-ring: Attempting "conversion" in AM when I can clearly read instruction manual! :-o

Chao for Now, Dudes

peteR
peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
BIG-CITY, bY-GAwD USA - Thursday, January 07, 1999 at 22:14:20 (EST) 


308 Gunner - The Rem factory trigger ISN"T intended to be a 2-stage setup. Sure you can give it more creep, but why ??? Take barrel out of stock....get some spray carburetor cleaner or "Gun Scrub" and hose down the trigger assembly !! Make sure the trigger is in a position to drain. Then use some synthetic oil like "Militec" or your favorite flavor and LIGHTLY lube the trigger !!! You can adjust the creep and weight but be aware if you do then the warranty is voided, thats why they have the lacquer over the screws !!! You could dis-assemble the trigger but thats a real pain in the *ss. If you have the money to spare.....buy a "Timney" or "Canjar"...good to go !!

After cruising thru some of the other sites SC has links to, I see that drag bags aren't cheap !!! Why not use a military drop bag and save yourself some $$$$$$ ?? I think Brigade Quartermaster has them for about $40 and then you can modify to suit your needs. I suppose if your dragbag has to perform double duty and be a shooting mat also then you might have a problem but ...over at Ft Benning they have some at "Ranger Rags" (surplus store) and they run $15-25. Made of canvas, heavy canvas, and has a felt inner padding. Just a thought, may not be as "cute - high speed" as some of those bags but it darn sure works !!
OUT HERE
Will <willadams@mindspring.com>
Awake in, AL USA - Friday, January 08, 1999 at 04:14:26 (EST) 


>The following was taken from the Opinion page of the Savannah Morning
>News, 23 December 1998.
>
> "In a move straight out of a "Saturday Night Live" skit, the Department
> of Defense on Monday announced it was upset with politically incorrect
> graffiti scribbled on one of the bombs dropped on Iraq last week.
> Pentagon officials saw an Associated Press photo taken during the
> four-day bombing campaign that showed a 2000-pound laser-guided bomb on the
> aircraft carrier USS Enterprise in the Persian Gulf with an inscription
> that said, "Here's a Ramadan present from Chad Rickenberg."
>
> The Clinton administration was not amused at this breach of bombing
> etiquette. "Department of Defense officials were distressed to learn of
> thoughtless graffiti mentioning the holy month of Ramadan written on a
> piece of U.S. ordnance during Operation Desert Fox" in Iraq, chief Pentagon
> spokesman Kenneth Bacon said in a statement Monday. "Religious intolerance
> is an anathema to Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen and to all
> Americans who cherish the right to worship freely," he added. "The United
> States deeply respects Islam."
>
> Imagine the nerve of some sailor insulting Moslems right before
> they're bombed, maimed and killed. It is irrelevant whether the victims
> could read the graffiti as the bombs plummeted toward their homes.
>
> Clearly what counts is the expression of the offending thought, not the
>fact that
> people are being blown to smithereens.
> Although the Geneva Convention is silent on this matter, we salute the
> Pentagon for insisting on politically correct bombings. We suggest in
> the future that all U.S. armed forces paint yellow smiley faces on all
> ordnance and adopt as its official wartime slogan: It's not personal, it's
> just business."

Torsten <lasercon@dialup.globe.de>
G3ermany - Friday, January 08, 1999 at 06:36:33 (EST) 


Torsten...
"It's not personal, it's just business." (Loved your post...)

You foreign guys out there just don't understand the current America.
It's not what we "DO" that counts, it's what we "SAY" about what we do that counts...
It didn't count that we messed up in Somalia... we felt their (the Somalians) PAIN! (but somehow, not the pain of our own military).
And when we bomb an aspirin factory... it's important to understand that our leader "Feels their pain"... as he gives the workers an "Excedren Headache!"
And as the bombs fall on the Muslems, kneeling in prayer, our fearless leader, "Feels their pain", and must show respect.

"It's not personal, it's just business.", just like his love life.

Paul "Pablito" Coburn <condor@mags.net>
USA - Friday, January 08, 1999 at 07:11:33 (EST) 


peteR,
I haven't played with the 178s yet I have 168 and 155 A-Maxs but I haven't had a chance to play around with them either. Jr. delt me out of my "Tack driver" and it was a great test bed, it shot everything well. The 168s look like 190s I know you would never be able to load mag length and touch the rifling. They look like they would fly forever and I've heard good things about them.

Bill R,
Good Post and well said you didn't beat up on him but he should have gotten the idea.

Torsten & Paul
You two should work as a team for the "Policically correct". Torsten could do the releases and Paul you could explain them!! That way all of us misguided and misunderstood "Red Neck Gun Owners" could be accepted by the "Policically correct public".

Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Friday, January 08, 1999 at 07:55:32 (EST) 


J.D. Hicks and Bruce N. Robinson: I voted. Thanks. What about the rest of you?

peteR: I don't have any production models ready yet but you can make your own at home. Get an Army duffel bag (the cotton one, not the new nylon type) and about 5 pounds of molybdenum disulfide (pharmaceutical grade). Put the duffel bag in your clothes dryer, dump in the moly and turn it on. The permanent press cycle works best since it has a "cool-down" period like the Brady Bill. Man, I'm gonna be rich! Hope this doesn't double post.
Paul J. Headlee <pheadlee@networksplus.net>
Ogden, KS USA - Friday, January 08, 1999 at 08:07:12 (EST) 


To C.Donn Swanbom II: Unfortunately I do can not give any info on actual incidents, where a LE sniper would have shot a gun out of criminals hand. Still I would like to give a few comments:

If a sniper tries to shoot the weapon out of a hostage takers hand, there are several possible outcomes:

1) The gun is hit, and the hostage taker is overwhelmed by SWAT-people and nobody gets hurt big time. Not very likely.

2) The gun is hit, but due to the impact the gun fires and the hostage or a third party is hurt big time. Possible.

3) The rifle bullet hits the hand of the criminal, passes through bone and flehs and carries on at around 2300 fps and may hit somebody else. Also the criminal can still shoot wth the other hand. Very possible.

4) The sniper misses the hand ans criminal totally, but the passing bullet and sonic boom of it causes unvoluntary reflection in the criminal, his gun goes bang and the situation ends in full shoot out. This outcome most probably has happened many times.

I think that the threat to hostages and third parties are too big, when a sniper tries to shoot the gun out of a criminals hand. Therefore this method should never be an official tactic. A sniper may choose to use it, but only if he really knows how to do it. In the end he must live with the consuquences. Last but not least, if somebody is so big threat that he can be shot legally, then the sniper should try to maximize his stopping power and aim to more effective body parts than a weapon or hand.

Hexa
Hexa <heikki.juhola@telia.fi>
Helsinki, Finland - Friday, January 08, 1999 at 08:35:34 (EST) 


Another cold and nasty morning in SE Illinois. Contemplating a test of two sub-caliber pogo sticks and a Musgrave Palma rifle. With this kind of weather, the testing will have to wait!

Several days past, I mentioned the use of 175 Sierra MK's in my machine rest. Sorry that I didn't back up the good results of those bullets with a load. Since the loads were not mine, I can take no credit for the superb accuracy.

As stated, the barrel was a 1 in 13" .298 - .3065 Krieger. The chamber was Obermeyer. The OAL in each case 2.80" to conform with Palma rules. The first ten shots were from 1992 Palma cases, Federal 210M primers and 45 grains VV N-140 (non-moly). The second ten were in Rem. BR brass, Rem. 71/2 BR primers and, again, 45 grains of VV N-140 (non-moly). Both groups were little knots (1 1/4") at 500 yards. The first ten shots were not chronographed but the the second ten produced deviations well under 10. This last load was used by a friend at Cedar Springs, Ont. on labor day and a 900M comparison was made with the Sierra 155 Palma. The 155 Palma bullet, with a comparable load, used about two minutes less elevation at that distance. For those interested in Varget, the classic load for the 155 seems to be 45.3 grains. The VV N-140 load at about 46 grains.

I note considerable interest here with the Hornady bullets. While
I've only tested 168 and 180 light mag factory loads, it was superb
in the above mentioned barrel. In a Hart barreled 1 in 10" twist
M-700, this ammunition did not produce good results. Whether this
was due to twist or internal dimensions of the barrel, I haven't a clue.

Just some pre-breakfast Friday morning musing.
Bill Wylde <k9wxr@rr1.net>
SE, IL USA - Friday, January 08, 1999 at 09:24:41 (EST) 


Speaking of Drag bags: We will have a review of London Bridge Trading Company's LBT-1655 and LBT-0110 drag bags in a few weeks, maybe less. Also look for our review of Eagles' shooting matt/drag bag which should appear shortly thereafter.

All are great products. But as you pointed out, they are not cheap. On the other hand they do have unique features that would be hard to duplicate from scratch, the least being the quality of the stitching. By the time you were done, you might find the money invested was equal to the price of one of these bags! That being said, you can make a drag bag with a little effort. It ain't all that tough. Home built units usually lack external and internal pockets for storage of gear, but they do serve their primary role well, that of transporting the sniper rifle across rough terrain. What you get with a quality commercial drag bag purchased from a reputable company is a well constructed piece of gear that will last a lifetime. It will have a lot of well thought out features that allow you (especially police snipers) to store everything you need for a call out or short duration mission in one well organized sack. These bags are far superior to a padded canvas sock or a modified gun case. They ain't cheap...but in consolation, you do get what you pay for.

Commercial bags give you two basic choices. A simply and sturdy bag to transport the weapon, OR an elaborate back pack that will allow you to transport the weapon in addition to all the ancillary gear - food, scope, tripod, ammo, binos, water, ad nausea. You have to decide what you need before the final purchase. Humping a ruck and a drag bag is perfectly acceptable, but sometimes having a bag that can carry it all while leaving your hands free to carry a carbine or navigate mountainous terrain is pretty nice too. For police, having it all in one organized bag sure beats the heck out of taking the weapon in a hard case and having all the other gear in a separate carry all. One thing that does not work: using a basic drag bag as a carry all. There is no simple way to attach all the gear you would like to bring along to a bag with out extra compartments. You just can not have it both ways. Stuffing the gear in the main compartment with the rifle is also problematic as it can shift and beat the rifle up pretty good. For example, sticking your spotting scope in with the rifle is asking for trouble. Tying it outside just gets it lost. You NEED that external cargo pocket.
Scott <xring@voicenet.com>
USA - Friday, January 08, 1999 at 10:01:00 (EST) 


WYLDE THANG,

a most excellent post, please let us know when you get some Hornadys (and time) to play with them! Your input would be a most valuable asset to us shooting pilgrims.

Paul H.
It Worked, It Really worked! Drag bag is now moly coated, so are uniforms, WIFEY'S UNDIES, my underwear, socks, kids clothes, We're now a genuine High Speeeeed/Loooooow Drag kinda family! THANKS DUDE!

Sarge, snowed in? Was ist los?
 

Time to trade the Banjo for a snow shovel 6"plus on ground n still going.

Torsten, You Da'Spin Doktorr. I have no doubts, Billy Bob can use you!
peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
SNOW CITY, bY-gAwD USA - Friday, January 08, 1999 at 11:47:39 (EST) 


I just purchased an HK SR9. I have not been able to find any accuracy data on this rifle. I am going to reload, and I would like to know what kind of accuracy I should expect out of this rifle. I have spoken to one owner who did reload. The only information he could/would give is the term 'SURGICAL'. I, unfortunately, was looking more for quantifiable data. (i.e. moa, avg spread at 100 yds, etc...)

Any information that you could give me on this rifle would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you in advance for your time in this manner,

Walt Hucks
Walt Hucks <awhucks@hotmail.com>
Winston-Salem, NC USA - Friday, January 08, 1999 at 12:24:59 (EST) 


JR,
Nice to hear from someone who makes H-S stocks. I have several that are giving me excellent accuracy with the drop-in fit (as it came from the factory). But I have one Remington that just won't shoot worth a crap unless both action screws are torqued way beyond reason - and then it punches single hole five shot groups. The heads on the screws won't take this kind of torque for long before the allen heads strip out.

How would you recommend bedding this one gun (in hopes of getting it t shoot with a reasonable torque setting)?

Thanks for any info.
JPinTX
JPinTX <pruett@inu.net>
Lufkin, TX USA - Friday, January 08, 1999 at 14:23:07 (EST) 


Sarge looks out from his warm hide and fires:

No guys I'm NOT snowed in, haven't even SEEN snow so far! In fact was 71 yesterday and 60 today LOVE this weather! Now if the D**M wind would quit! OK on to other things!
The CNN poll is very enlightening everyone that reads the Duty Roster needs to go "vote"!
JR - I couldn't figure out from your post if you use to work for H-S or still do? Anyway I got off the phone with them about 20 minutes ago with some bad news. They don't make stocks of any kind for Savage rifles! That stinks!
Now for some REALLY ROTTEN news - have been going all over town today looking in my 3 different gunshops (have a real big choice don't I!!) looking for someone to give me a good price on a 700VS. All the stores called different suppliers (one place called 3) and all got the same answer - REMINGTON has DISCONTINUED THE 700VS!!! Now that REALLY STINKS!! Anyone else heard this???
Gee anybody out there with some GOOD news!

Sarge
 

Sarge <garryrn@dfn.com>
Area 51, NM USA - Friday, January 08, 1999 at 16:04:47 (EST) 


Been doing alot of reading about rifle for the last 5 years.
One question I have never seen answered is, When storing your rifle for a period of time, is it best to releave the pressure on the firing pin or will it not hurt it to stay cocked. (bolt action)
David Moody <CntDracula@aol.com>
USA - Friday, January 08, 1999 at 16:29:47 (EST) 
Re: Disabling firearm
Re: Leupold cold soak

Several years ago in Columbus, Ohio there was a shot fired to disable a firearm. If memory serves me, the guy was sitting on the Statehouse or courthouse lawn in a folding chair. The handgun (looked like a snub) was held in front of him dangling between his legs. At the shot (from about 75 yds), the handgun scattered into many pieces and stung the man's hand. In an interview afterwards, either the sniper, or another sniper said that they routinely shoot .308 casings at 100 yds.

The next time that I was at the 100 yard range, I placed three 308 cases on a 100 yd. target frame. I was in the process of perfecting loads in a 6mm Rem 40-X in a Zelenak aluminum stock. Three shots later……. I was able to recover two of the cases neatly perforated. Still have them. It was a bum custom barrel which never shot better than ¾" groups, so it was just a lucky 3-shot group.

Put a Leupold 24X (first generation) in my deep freezer for about 6 hours the other day. The temp was -20° F. ( -28° C). There was quite a bit of stiction (sp?) on the first attempt to move both elevation and windage knobs, and each jumped about a moa or so. However, once broken free, both knobs responded with tactile and audible clicks that were not very different from those in normal temperatures.
Ron N.
 

Ron N. <rcn8@accnorwalk.com>
USA - Friday, January 08, 1999 at 16:57:23 (EST) 


Sarge, check out a Winchester model 70 heavy varmint. It's in the same price range as the remy but has IMO a better stock profile (made by H&S) and equal (perhaps better?) accuracy potential.
Rich <dick2@clarkston.com>
WA USA - Friday, January 08, 1999 at 17:10:33 (EST) 
Howdy fellers.

Sorry I've been so quiet lately. I'm going through a divorce while trying to get moved up to Storm Mountain and my motivation level has been zilch point shit. Add to it that my ex is marrying another person in this field (supposedly a "friend") and its been a real bear. Onward and upward!

I have held off commenting on the shooting guns out of perps hands. Hexa had some very good points. I have found the energy up to partake in this.

First and most obvious question is why would a LE sniper want to shoot a gun out of someones hand? I suppose we could argue back and forth about flacid paralysis not being a sure thing. But you can say the same thing for the fact that the gun might still go off or the sniper might miss (ala hexa's remarks). Bottom line is you still have a maggot hostage taker that will now sue your ass, eat up some correctional facilities budget and probably get out and pull this type of shit again. You have a victim who has to live with the fact that the hostage taker is still out there somewhere maybe seeking revenge or continuing the episode at a later date.

I can group very good on a stationary target, on a firing range when I have control of most everything. But what is the liklihood that I will lose a little group tightener under stress or the gun will move just as I shoot. Pretty good I think.

Men, "In my opinion" don't even entertain this subject if you are a cop. Train for it and leave it in your bag of tricks but don't ever let on to a supervisor that this is an option available to him. Besides, I wonder how many of these incidents were accidental that the sniper involved took credit for as being intentional? Hey it looks good in the press right?

Stick with the high percentage shots. Mark Maguire hit a shit load of homers but how many times did he strike out? Murphy is alive and well. I know. I've met him and his son!

YOu guys that are freezing your scopes...How do they work as ice cubes. That would be cool at a party. Mug of Rum with a M3A sticking out of it. Great conversation starter. Got to watch that eye relief though. You could poke your eye out!

On easing springs with weapons. Always been a habit of mine to drop the hammer when storing a weapon to preserve spring strength. We teach it with Remington based weapons systems. It is also one of the last steps of "inspection arms" in drill and cerimony for this reason. (Had a DI once tell me it was to make sure the weapon wasn't loaded. Jeeeze!)

Whats that? I hear a banjo!! Im a West virginny man!! Yeehaawww.

Guys I love it up there. See, even a old sniper finds a zero every now and then. Ya'll come on up to Storm Mountain ya hear! We'll throw some 'possum on the grill and shoot steel. Got about a 1300 yard shot from the front porch.

See ya,
Gooch
gooch <gooch@stormmountain.com>
USA - Friday, January 08, 1999 at 18:53:49 (EST) 


308 Gunner:

The Remington is a single stage trigger as it comes from the factory. There are two, 2 stage trigger systems out on the market that fit the 700 actions with little work. The first is the Jewell this is a great unit that simulates the action of a 2 stage trigger. They are around $250.00 and have a safety.

The other unit is the Medisha. This is a true 2 stage trigger but has no provision for a safety. A Winchester M-70 style safety can be fitted to the rifle's bolt at around $200.00. The trigger sells for around $350.00. This is a great trigger but the expensive way to go.

A factory Warranty Service station for Remington can adjust the trigger and not void the warranty. This is the least expensive way to go but it will still be a single stage trigger.

As for the AR-15 there is