September 18, 1999 to September 25, 1999
SORT team is on permanent standby until end of October. First team out for entire east coast. Carlos now looking real bad. Twix her and himacanes, work, daughter in college and everything else, damn! Have had no time to shoot, no time to build gillie.
Gert is on Floyd's ass. Don't place your bets yet!
Catastrophic, 1000 year flooding in eastern NC. Took daughter 9.5 hours to get home from UCU for a usually 4 hour drive. All roads east of 95 in NC are impassable.
RBowcher, are you flooded out?
Will check in before I leave, if I leave.
Bolt <mbolt34547@aol.com>
USA - Saturday, September 18, 1999 at 00:41:43 (ZULU) (your host address:
152.163.189.65)
As to the "almost no recoil"... HA... this puppy will get your attention when it goes off... it is stiff. I would sugest you go to the gunshop, and hold one next to a 7mm Rem mag, or a 300 Win mag to get an idea of whats inside.
Barrel life will be very short... 800 to 1500 rounds. This is a long range hunting round, and barrel life in not a consideration.
It can be loaded down a bit, but barrel life is going to be short, and very large cartridges don't respond well to very light charges... accuracy is crappy, no matter what you do.
"Is it as bad as say a .220 Swift?"
Much Worse!!
Jewel makes a trigger for the M70... it's $185 from Bruno's.
"This would be my first Winchester M70, and while I am pretty familiar with making remingtons shoot, I am skeptical about building a rifle on this platform. In case the factory barrel doesn't shoot worth a damn are there other custom barrels for this action (I would hope so)"
Every good barrel maker makes match, and benchrest grade barrels for the M70 action... no problem.
When the NRA tested the M70 Laredo against the Rem Sendero, and other "Bean field" rifles, the Winchester came in tops in grouping... under a minute of angle at 500 yards.
'lito
Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Saturday, September 18, 1999 at 01:06:08 (ZULU) (your host address:
208.249.180.71)
Yol Bolson
Partison
Partison <Partison@hotmail.com>
Missoula, Mt., USA - Saturday, September 18, 1999 at 04:01:49 (ZULU)
(your host address: 209.180.186.207)
No problem. High-Power shooters are having good results with the Winchester M70/HBV ( #535-013220). Despite the fact that it’s a bit of a load to haul around, people I have reason to defer to (distinguished experts and such) say its a much better value. (Don’t flame me, I love my Remingtons as much as you love your’s.)
Now, even at the big dealers back east, I can’t find a Winchester. GunsAmerica is no help.
Is anyone else having trouble finding a simple varmint-style .308 from one of the big two makers?
And, Larry. Go to your local ammo seller and ask to look at a box of 7mm Rem rounds and a box of 7mmSTW. Pull a round of each out and compare them. Firing, oh, 30 rounds of 7 mag in one sitting screws up my follow-through for weeks. I start to 'fuzz-out' rather than seeing the cross-hairs through the shot and letting the shot fall dead. I haven't fired the STW, but I have looked in awe at the cartridge. No thanks. Too short of a recoil impulse. It loosens my fillings just looking at it.
CDC
CDC <criscurt@isu.edu>
USA - Saturday, September 18, 1999 at 05:01:52 (ZULU) (your host address:
134.50.237.43)
Try looking at:
http://www.shotgunnews.com - you can find some stuff there
http://www.gunauction.net - active auctions of stuff... so-so
http://www.gearout.com - alot better - actually have selective searches.
These are actual classified ad's. Lot's of winchesters and remingtons last
time I looked.
Good Luck,
Ken :)
Ken <ImpactArea@snipercountry.com>
Nokesville, Va, USA - Saturday, September 18, 1999 at 12:18:57 (ZULU)
(your host address: 209.84.196.39)
Would like to confirm sizes with someone else out there. My scope is a Leuopold 4.5 x 14 x 50 LR tactical. The objective lens measures 2.3" - the eyepiece measures 1.56". According to the Butler Creek website - this means a #11 for the eyepiece and a #43 for the objective. Could any of youn'z out there confirm/adjust my findings.
Thanks in advance,
Ken :)
Ken <ImpactArea@snipercountry.com>
Nokesville, Va, USA - Saturday, September 18, 1999 at 18:58:23 (ZULU)
(your host address: 209.84.196.39)
I had a Remington 40XR single shot rimfire target gun toen down for several month in antisipation of parkerixing it (its reciever was badly pitted when I recieved it) but the chemicals have yet to show up from http://www.shootersolutions.com. Its starting to look like a real screwed up organisation. Next step: a letter to Visa, I suppose.
Aaaanyway, in the interim the detent ball that loads the saftey lever has take a bad bounce someplace. Anybody know of a sourse or, barring that, anybody happen to know the diameter of the ball so I can get a generic one?
Thnaks:
-Tom
Tom Simpson <bullet45@usit.net>
Colatown, in the nearly Floyd-free state of, SC, USA - Sunday, September
19, 1999 at 03:32:26 (ZULU) (your host address: 209.213.175.237)
We have the same scope (Leupold 4.5-14x50 LR MilDot Tactical). Your numbers for the Butler Creek scope caps match mine but a little caveat. If you have the sun shade on your scope, it has a large OD than the optics bell does. My dealer didn't have the right size in stock so I went one over a lined it with a piece of electronics foam tape (very thin stuff and non-adhesive). Worked just fine.
I think this scope is underrated, especially for long range work. All someone need do is check the huge range of adjustment for both vertical and horizontal planes.... 80" @ 100 yards or 800" @ 1000 yds. Great stuff!
-=[Bob]=-
Bob (SD) <bald1@usa.net>
USA - Sunday, September 19, 1999 at 03:57:55 (ZULU) (your host address:
206.31.207.119)
Bruce Hilsabeck <bruceh@ionet.net>
Lawton, Oklahoma, USA - Sunday, September 19, 1999 at 07:30:07 (ZULU)
(your host address: 38.193.116.33)
It is my great pleasure to announce that Sniper Country has officially got another member. Pete Reiff, also known as peteR, is now a member of the team, and I am sure all of you will agree that he has shown the knowledge, and willingness to share, to make an even greater contribution to the site than he has done so up till now as a visitor.
Garry, Scott and myself welcome him - now I have somebody new to pass all the "difficult" questions to :-)
Welcome Dude, hope you enjoy it.
Marius
Webmaster
PS The Duty Roster and Emporium names will also be changed shortly when I archive, but first I've got a dirty little bottom to clean.
Marius Ferreira <mferreira@intekom.co.za>
Pretoria, Gauteng, RSA - Sunday, September 19, 1999 at 09:59:43 (ZULU)
(your host address: 196.15.184.11)
No wonder he's been on line so much here lately!
bolt <mbolt34547@aol.com>
USA - Sunday, September 19, 1999 at 14:40:59 (ZULU) (your host address:
152.163.207.72)
Doug
Doug Lewis <dougl3@prodigy.net>
Concord, NC, USA - Sunday, September 19, 1999 at 16:10:49 (ZULU) (your
host address: 209.252.62.38)
I have ordered a lot of the same brass from the same sourse. You will be happy to know that it has not been run through an M14. You will be less happy to know that it has been run through an M60 or M240. :)
Yup, its MG brass and has had the bejesus stretched out of it. It
will likely go about two loads in an M1A and that'll be about it. Otherwise
it is reasonably clean and will tumble up bright in no time. Most of the
last batch I recieved was '90s dated. Good stuff, for the money.
gibrass.com is a good outfit to do business with.
-Tom
Tom Simpson <bullet45@usit.net>
Colatown, in the lovely state of, SC, USA - Sunday, September 19, 1999
at 17:28:50 (ZULU) (your host address: 209.213.175.209)
SBS HB Tactical Syn Stock ----------- Available .308.
26" Heavy barrel (HB), no sights, matte blue finish,
(2) removeable butt spacers, oversize bolt handle,
black bolt body, flush mounted QD swivels, drilled
and tapped for Browning A-Bolt 2 piece bases,
3 position safety, detachable magazine,
cold hammer forged barrel, receiver engraved "SBS Tactical HB"
and smooth wide trigger which is fully adjustable.
Tom <tomstuckey@hotmail.com>
USA - Monday, September 20, 1999 at 00:19:50 (ZULU) (your host address:
206.180.129.208)
I have been to this site a few times before and used to read the duty roster a lot, but haven't for a while (damm computer problems), so please excuse me if this question has been asked before.
I was thinking of buying an AN/PVS-4 in second gen. to mount on my AR-15 for varmits and my own ammusement. Does anyone have any experances with this scope, good or bad? Also do you thing that an AR and a PVS-4 are an effective combo? I was going to buy it from a company called NAIT, any experances with them?
Thanks,
Theo
MrF2@aol.com
Theo Martin <MrF2@aol.com>
Clackamas, OR, USA - Monday, September 20, 1999 at 00:40:40 (ZULU)
(your host address: 152.163.204.209)
Gooch, The last Russian I saw was in Grenada and I had a M203
stuck in his face, Not a wholly unpleasant experiance. Hardgun.
john P. Burrell <hardgun@earthlink.net>
Manor , Tx, USA - Monday, September 20, 1999 at 00:51:36 (ZULU) (your
host address: 168.191.184.19)
B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Monday, September 20, 1999 at 02:58:18 (ZULU) (your host address:
209.184.248.252)
Happened to be on the range the other day ( a lousy day on the range
beats any day at work . . .) when a friend pulled out a pair of nice looking
binocs, 7x50. Since I want to get a really nice pair of binocs for field
and hunting, I took a look through them. The maker was IOR and the glass
was amazing clear for something made in Romania (correct?). The look and
feel struck me as a poor man's Steiner. So, any one else tried them or
has them and can they tell me how they like them or any problems that they
have had with them in field conditions? Curious before comtemplating buying
a pair (yeah, yeah . . . I'd get a Steiner but the new transmission came
in ahead).
Morris <mparrish@oz.net>
Seattle Metro, WA, USA - Monday, September 20, 1999 at 06:18:56 (ZULU)
(your host address: 216.39.133.73)
- Someone asked about the Winchester Model 70 in .308.
Mine is almost broken in, and after good Ol Jerry Rice adjusted
the trigger for me last week, yours truly is now able to hold 3/4 moa groups.
That's without any other aftermarket modifications whatsoever. If the rifle
will do this in my hands I imagine most of you could do even better. Less
than 200 rounds down the tube but not one problem. Traders (who is linked
off of the tacticalintervention.com site)was where I bought mine. I am
sure he can get or has more. Ask for Mark.
He is a really good guy.
- Someone asked about 308PSS availability a while back.
Kerleys gun shop in Cupertino california had one of them last tiem
I was in there.
- I note TRGT.com has some brand new images of their databook and other new images of thier items posted. Might be worth a gander.
- Finally I spent a very pleasant Saturday with Jerry Rice and his
bride of 42 years. Undude (Mike Miller) has spoken of this wonderful riflesmith
here before. Keep your eyes open! Nor-Cal Precision is about to enter the
world of the web, with a little help from memorableplaces.com, and you'll
be able to see his online catalogue within the next 2-3 weeks. :-)
JT <tenarius@memorableplaces.com>
USA - Monday, September 20, 1999 at 07:10:04 (ZULU) (your host address:
204.156.137.61)
I have all three.
If you load a few hundred or so, of a lot of case head sizes, the Dillon 550 is the machine... it's slow, but easiest to change shell plates, and cheap. However, it is limited... the four die stations is not enough for most of my loading, so it winds up loading 22 Hornet, .218 Bee... stuff like that, that I'll make a run of, once a year.
The Lock-n-load is not expensive, and a pretty good machine... but
it has some odd characteristics. The shell holder rotates as it travels
up into the dies, and with long cases, and some of the "Match" seaters,
like the Redding Benchrest seater, or the Forster "Ultra", the bullet hits
the side on the die before it gets into the die to be seated... I had to
cut a slot into the side of my .308 "Ultra", die inorder to keep the bullets
from being knocked off of the case as they entered the die. It is nice
to be able to remove the powder measure to empty the powder measure, but
the quick change thing is mostly fluff!
Their powder measure is very good, and the contraption that actavates
the measure is fantastic! (and it works on other progressives, and with
RCBS measures!!)... but the steel that the measure is made of gets "brown"
in an atmosphere that doesn't effect any other of 6 progressives machines.
The Dillon 650 is one of the top machines around... it is time consuming to switch shell holders, and even more time consuming if you have the auto casefeeder, but if you buy and load cases by the thousands, this puppy is THE ONE to have...
Everybody I know, thinks the Dillon dies are grap, only slightly better that the Hornady, that are SHIT!... I've thrown Dillon and Hornady dies in the garbage. If you get a Dillon or Hornady, get Redding, or Forster match dies if you are concerned with accuracy.
'lito
Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Monday, September 20, 1999 at 11:30:15 (ZULU) (your host address:
208.249.180.3)
(Since the Emporium posts are deleted, this detail has been put back here in the archives. - Webmaster)
Hey guys, from time to time, I repost an bit of information about
ballistic data tables that I
developed for use while working as a sniper instructor for Army
Special Forces. These data
tables were developed over the years and are "shot proven", not
theoretical math based
models. Here are the particulars.
These tables are hand calculated specialized data tables. The tables
I have are for common
military calibers.
1. .50 BMG (using Mk211-MOD-0, M33 Ball, M8 API, M20 APIT and M903
SLAP ammo).
2. 338 Lapua (using 300 grain Sierra Matchking at 2850 fps) 3. .300
Magnum (loads for 220
grain Sierra MK at 2820 fps, 185 gr. Lapua @3250 fps, 190 gr. Sierra
MK @ 3000 fps {the
military A-191 load}. 4. .308 Winchester (Civilian loads using 168
gr. Sierra MK at 2600,
2650, 2700, and 2750 fps, 168 gr. Berger VLD and LTB bullets at
2800 fps). 5. 7.62mm
NATO for M118 Special Ball, and Special Ball Long Range, and M852
Match (168 gr.
Sierra MK at 2600 fps) and M80 Ball (147 gr. bullet @ 2750 fps).
Individual caliber sets are available without buying the entire set.
The entire set is a much
better deal at 100.00, (price reduced from 125.00) however each
caliber set is 25.00. For
example, a set of M118, M118 Long Range and M80 Ball 7.62mm military
and .308 tables
would be 50.00. The .50 caliber tables alone are 50.00 because there
is much more data. If
you are interested specifically in the .50 tables, they have all
5 standard military rounds
"Greentip" Mark 211, MOD-0, M8 API, M33 Ball, M20 APIT, and M903
slap data.
These tables is highly refined and very accurate tables that give
elevations in minutes of
angle, elevation settings per 100 meters, remaining velocities,
spin drift, flight times, angle of
fall, danger space and wind deflection in inches, Mils, and Minutes
of Angle. This data has
been proven with many different .50 caliber rifles and other sniper
weapons systems in many
worldwide environments.
What makes these more accurate than any table generated by computer
or on the market is
that a different and precise ballistic co-efficient is used every
100 meters. There are based on
live firings and the data corrected to standard atmospheric conditions.
Therefore the times of
fight that are used in the windage formulas are more accurate. Computer
models use an
average over a certain range. This contains many errors as velocities
and data around the
trans-sonic flight range will be in gross error.
These tables ARE NOT REACTIVE as are other "data books" that are
on the market. They
are designed so that the sniper can correct for all meteorological
and environmental
conditions the sniper may shoot in. Furthermore, more data can be
developed as requested.
The tables are sent with a 70 page instruction book that not only
teaches the use of the
tactical tables but is a short course on exterior ballistics and
precision zero techniques that
correctly tune these tables to the gun/ammunition system for advanced
sniper applications.
The tables are printed on card stock (5 x 7") format.
They are inserted in a very strong and flexible vinyl page that is
similar to a document
protector and are bound together with 5 ea. 1" rings. The cover
is a BDU camouflage heavy
vinyl. These are the same as the USAF flight crew manifest checklist
booklet. You can see the
book insert i am using at www.pdipueblo.com go to the vinyl products
section. The cost of
this option is 15.00 per book set.
Please feel free to call me about these if interested (314) 439-8063.
Money back honestly, if
not impressed and satisfied.
Email: Dmicha@swbell.net
Dean
Trigger50 <Dmicha@swbell.net>
USA - Monday, September 20, 1999 at 12:51:43 (ZULU) (your host address:
207.193.24.85)
The 30 refers to caliber, the "C" refers to coated (a desirable thing),
and the 17,36,44 refers to actual rod length in inches. In addition get
a good quality bore guide and pierce type jag.
Here are two most excellant choices for cleaining gear
www.brownells.com
www.sinclairintl.com
They usually have mass quantities of cleaning goodies in stock and are very reputable to deal with.
Chao!
peteR <PNGREIFF @AOL.COM>
BIG CITY, BY-GAWD, USA - Monday, September 20, 1999 at 13:17:44 (ZULU)
(your host address: 205.188.196.41)
I have two pairs of IOR binoculars, the 7x40 and the 10x50. Neither have the optional rangefider as I felt they added more clutter than they were worth for my application. I also own an 8x56mm IOR rifle scope.
This is world-class gear by most any standard. IOR builds them but the glass is actualy sourced from the former Zeiss Jenna facility in eastern Germany. They compare rather well to the Steiners and I have put them up side by side with high-end Steiner and other German and Austrian products. As the review found elsewhere on this site indicates, they are rather heavy as they are made in the old European tradition with steel bodies.
One source is:
http://www.eurooptics.com/
Another source is Valdada Enterprises of Steamboat Springs, CO. Look for their ads in the Gun LIst. They have them a bit cheaper than the above URL. Cheapest of all is to have Brownells special order them for you, but only if you stand for dealer or trade discounts with Brownells.
HTH!
-Tom
Tom Simpson <bullet45@usit.net>
Colatown, SC, USA - Monday, September 20, 1999 at 14:11:56 (ZULU) (your
host address: 209.213.175.192)
Anyway, my question -- what off-the-shelf Remington or Winchester
would best fit the bill here? While I don't mind trading the stock (and
would prefer to put an H-S M-24 type on the rifle), I don't want to have
to get it rebarreled anytime soon. Accuracy of 3/4 MOA with handloads would
be just fine.
JC <johnc@iglou.com>
USA - Monday, September 20, 1999 at 14:45:21 (ZULU) (your host address:
198.5.222.45)
'lito
PAblito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Monday, September 20, 1999 at 15:07:40 (ZULU) (your host address:
208.249.180.64)
Deans Data Book: I used his book for awhile. I found the information very good. I wish the 308 stuff was in yards in addition to meters. I could never get the velocity of 2800fps out of my 300win with 220's so I wish he would come out with a set for the standard 2650fps load. The price is right for what he is giving you, based on all the work into and the small operation he runs. One thing I completely agree with is his system of comeups from a set zero. He lists total minutes from zero so in the heat of it all you have to do is dial. Very good Dean.
Dean's data books are part of a system that requires a calculator for the calculations. This I found fine for long range 1000plus. For the shots up to 1000 it took too much time so I just used the data given. That I believe is what he intended. Many have misunderstood and thought he preached to do all the calculations everytime. Now Dean teaches some things that some others do not find merit in, such as spin drift and many adjustments for enviornmental changes. Jury is still out on this. I have gone to: Range it, make angle adjustments, make altitude adjustments, make temp adjustments, make wind adjustments and fire. So far this is working for me, but I tend to only shoot to 1000 yards. That is all we have around here so until I get back to Jarretts place and really strecth out the 50cal I wont know for sure. I am told by others of the SOTIC that my way will take as far as the rifle will hold.
For the average guy, I do not believe that a data book is any better than the TRGT. I have taken mine and made entries of my actual come ups and wind corrections. Good to go.
300 Mag rifles: Right now I would go with either the Remington Sendero/PSS or Winchester SS Fluted. All three are great with both Remingtons having a flaw. The PSS has a very crappy detachable magazine but a great stock. The Sendero has a stock I do not like. Too flexable in the forend. The Winchester has a plastic bedding compound I would remove and replace with Marine Tex. Today I would probably go with the Winchester unless I was planning on having it worke don latter. Than it would be a Remington.
Pete, great to see you a member!
MikeM <Tactical@tacticalintervention.com>
Calif, USA - Monday, September 20, 1999 at 15:55:44 (ZULU) (your host
address: 152.163.201.176)
Bill R,
I hate to tell this but you have spoke of the Ruuuu.. on many different
occasions and I had the opportunity to set one up an sight it in for my
new Son in Law and it was a M77 in a 300WM. I only cleaned it before taking
it to the range and sighting it in with 180gr factory Noz Part. for elk
hunting and it shot 3 shots into 2 to 1.5 groups and never hardly fouled.
After 20 rounds it took 3 patches of sweets to clean out what copper there
was and then after shooting back to 400 with it and cleaning it again the
same thing only this time 2 patches!!! This from a new gun that was not
broke in properly. I could tell when I cleaned it the first time it had
a smooth barrel not bad for a factory barrel and a cheap rifle, it will
make him a great hunting rifle.
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Monday, September 20, 1999 at 16:23:20 (ZULU) (your host address:
207.221.188.130)
I was trying out my new OAL guage, measured the OAL and subtracted .005..loaded up my 168 gr MKs with 42 gr of 4064, federal match primers and started my test string...yuck..I was shooting groups the size of a quarter with the factory ammo at 100 yds...the hand loads opened up to almost twice that...
I also noticed that closing the bolt involved some resistance with the hand loads...I ejected one after closing it in the breech and ONE side had a wide scratch on the bullet ogive, almost 30% of the total circumference of the bollet was scratched...this to me suggests some abnormality in the breech, is this a commonly encountered problem? Does this suggest some known symptom of a worn barrel?
Any hints on how to adjust my load to compensate...I'm planning on
backing off another .01 to see if that improves my groups...I'm not dissatisfied
with the accuracy, just stunned to find a rifle that seems to like short,
commercial rounds? I'm also gonna give it a good going over with Sweets
and some JB compound to remove any potential fowling that my normal cleaning
isn't taking care of..
Jim Mitchell <james_mitchell@merck.com>
NJ, USA - Monday, September 20, 1999 at 16:51:25 (ZULU) (your host
address: 12.20.190.1)
It's tough now getting back to reality. After two weeks of total
imersion, humping equipment through heat, cold, and rain, wearing cammo,
stalking and shooting everyday, it's a real culture shock to be sitting
on a cushy chair in an air-conditioned office and pushing buttons. I keep
having dreams that there's one more mission I need to complete.
Grasshopper <wd6cmu@earthlink.net>
Richmond, CA, USA - Monday, September 20, 1999 at 18:03:18 (ZULU) (your
host address: 205.139.95.15)
PeteR: congrats, always good to see someone moving up in the world.
John P. Burrell: Beretta makes a bad 9? HMMM? Please allow me to let you in on my experience! When I used to live at White Sands Missile Range, I purchased exactly 5 boxes of winchester 115 JHP's per year from Midway (my allowance). That's 5000 bullets per year, for 3 years straight. I load them to HOT specs, 1370 fps over my oehler triple screen, not that I want them that fast, but that's the most accurate load I could get. Only got better the hotter I went. Ran them ALL through that Beretta. Competed for 3 years with it. Still have it, still shoots better than me. The one before that has a Bar-Sto barrel in it, and you wouldn't beleive the number of rounds I ran through that thing. Anyway, yes, it's aluminum in the lower, no it isn't a danger to anyone (unless you're running black tip sub-gun ammo or a suppressor on it), or I would think I would know with well over 40,000 rounds through two of them, most all +P or +P+ depending on who you talk to. Disposable? Yeah, I guess we all are. After all, I assume I will die some day, and on that day, I assume my boy will still be shooting +P ammo out of that same Beretta. Just wanted to let you know, from someone who has done it.
B. Rogers: man, a 50 yard one shot hit??!! Man, YOU'RE the man! Done this before, but it took me 3 to get in the middle (cheating, had a friend "spotting" me). And you're telling it exactly as it is. Accuracy is EVERYTHING, and a hit with a MP-5 will DEFINATELY out do a miss with a AK any day, even if it is a 9mm! Anyway, when I read about that 50 yard hit, just had to say that I'm impressed. One day ask me about the 200 yard gong and a 6" python...
Jack Ouellette: I have the hornady unit, traded off an older one for the new lock&load system. I can highly suggest this one. The reason I didn't get the smaller Dillon is because I actually use all 5 stations, and you only get 4 with the Dillon. The bigger Dillon gives you the right amount of stations, but I couldn't say that I liked it $100 more than the Hornady. Mostly that comment is due to the terrific powder system that Pablito addressed. The hornady is a top notch unit, although you might want to read the next comment.
Pablito: I agree with everything you said so far on the Hornady/Dillon thing, except I have one thing to add. I use mine for large quantity pistol ammo and have NEVER had any problems. I like the L&L quick change deal, 'cause I do (these guys won't beleive this) load mucho 45 auto along with the mega 9mm. Quickly changes everything out, including the powder measure. Note here though, get the pistol chamber for the powder measure, I love it, much more accurate! The problems you noted with rifle rounds are all quite true, but I do my rifle rounds (except blasting 5.56) on the old RCBS rock chucker. I've never done a bona fide side by side test to see if the rock chucker actually gives me more accuracy, but I think it does, and if it doesn't, I can't tell. Gives me one less thing to blame a bad shot on ('cause it can't be me!).
Sorry for the long post, I'll shut up for another week now.
Bravo <Bravo762@yahoo.com>
Cedar City, Utah, USA - Monday, September 20, 1999 at 18:12:20 (ZULU)
(your host address: 12.9.223.165)
Mike "Undude" Miller has finished a review of the TRGT-LLP Databook. I have htmled his work, added some graphics and posted it to the Tactical Intervention Specialists Website.
Complete with illustrations and mikes opinion of the Databook as well as a link to the TRGT website, this piece is the first online look at this product that I have seen.
Check it out here:
http://www.tacticalintervention.com/trgtdatabookreview.html
Take care,
JT - Webmaster Tactical Intervention
Specialists <tenarius@memorableplaces.com>
USA - Monday, September 20, 1999 at 18:55:52 (ZULU) (your host address:
204.156.137.61)
'lito
Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Monday, September 20, 1999 at 19:25:44 (ZULU) (your host address:
208.249.180.94)
What words of wisdom do you bring down off the mountain of Storms Grasshoppa?
peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
BIG CITY, BY-GAWD, USA - Monday, September 20, 1999 at 21:17:41 (ZULU)
(your host address: 152.163.207.73)
- Master Goochisan
humble student <humblestudent@sheepdipped.at_storm_mountain>
in the temple, of the mountain, they call Storm - Monday, September
20, 1999 at 21:40:32 (ZULU) (your host address: 142.176.68.120)
I have to agree with Pablito's take on the progressive reloaders.
I have owned a Hornady Projector. I now have an LX650. It takes
a little time to change shell holders. To go from small primers to large
primers will take some time , as well. I bought two primer units and have
one set up for small and one for large primers. This make things quicker.
It is the best progressive reloader I've ever used.
Also, Pablito is correct re: the dies. Especially if you want consistency. I've no experience with the Forster dies, but do with Redding. They are very accurate.
I use the 650 for large volume reloading. I prefer a single stage press for accurate rifle cartridge loads. I use a Forster Co-ax press and it , in combo, with Redding dies works beautifully. This is what I use because it gives the best variable control that my measuring tools and ability will allow.
My 2 cents,
Jeff A.
Jeff A. <d1k2l3@smyrnacable.net>
Smyrna, GA, USA - Monday, September 20, 1999 at 21:56:46 (ZULU) (your
host address: 139.76.64.4)
1. Drink your water.
2. If you're not ready to shoot, then be ready to move.
3. Camouflage is good, concealment is better.
4. Drink your water.
5. Don't trust other people's ammunition.
6. Think like your enemy, work like a team, or die by yourself.
7. Always check your dope before making The Shot.
Did I remember to say you should drink your water? Mineral suppliments would also be a good idea.
There's probably a few more I could come up with, I'll have to review
my journal.
Grasshopper <wd6cmu@earthlink.net>
Richmond, CA, USA - Monday, September 20, 1999 at 22:13:31 (ZULU) (your
host address: 205.139.95.15)
Yol Bolson
Partison
Partison <Partison@hotmail.com>
Missoula, Mt., USA - Tuesday, September 21, 1999 at 03:02:19 (ZULU)
(your host address: 209.180.185.134)
Or an ugly sheep, for that matter?
CDC <criscurt@isu.edu>
USA - Tuesday, September 21, 1999 at 03:02:48 (ZULU) (your host address:
134.50.237.69)
a couple of points of order please.
1.
Instream graphics. No-no! Please. The Duty Roster gets big enough
as it is without adding to the download time and size. Yes, it looks cool,
but I have to put my webmaster cap on and think of the bandwidth. Please
continue adding the links, but as links instead of instream please.
2.
Advertisements. Another No-no please. We do have the Emporium for
that. I was lenient but it has been creeping up, combined with the use
of instream pictures in cases. Please keep them where they belong, otherwise
soon we'll have all the regulars place their ads here instead of on the
Emporium.
Marius Ferreira <mferreira@intekom.co.za>
RSA - Tuesday, September 21, 1999 at 10:49:20 (ZULU) (your host address:
196.25.27.66)
T
Torsten <lasercon@dialup.globe.de>
Germany - Tuesday, September 21, 1999 at 12:22:50 (ZULU) (your host
address: 212.172.6.32)
MFS1589 <PCIRCO@HOME.COM>
USA - Tuesday, September 21, 1999 at 14:04:15 (ZULU) (your host address:
206.98.143.200)
Any of the "30" designated rods will fit a .308 or .30'06 caliber. Make sure you measure you rifle from the rear end of the receiver to muzzle and add and inch or so (forgot to write that yesterday-aduh) so the rod will do its job correctly. This would probably be either a a Dewey 30-C-36 or 30-C-44 rod.
Pierce type jag and Shooters Choice as solvent should serve you fine.
And hows Guam this time of the year may I ask?
Chao!
peteR <pngreiff@aol.com>
"Top of the World" Ma!, By-gawd, USA - Tuesday, September 21, 1999
at 16:36:50 (ZULU) (your host address: 205.188.197.32)
Alain <tiptoe.thruthe2lips@laposte.net>
FRANCE - Wednesday, September 22, 1999 at 02:22:50 (ZULU) (your host
address: 157.178.1.101)
Freedom, if you have never loved anything enough to fight and die
for, then you never have loved anything at all. I hope that I am not the
only one who loves my country (USA) this much. To all my brothers out there
Semper Fidelis. The Marine Corps is the last bastion of tradition and excellence
that goes beyond active duty and well into the spirit of men (and women
too)!
Bad Karma <jwhiteII56@hotmail.com>
CA, USA - Wednesday, September 22, 1999 at 02:26:07 (ZULU) (your host
address: 165.196.190.71)
I recently noticed the listed weight on an M40A1/Unertl setup is over 14 lbs. This seems heavier than it should be since it has a synthetic stock and basically a varmit or #7 contour, as best I can tell. A similar "civillian" gun set up would only be around 9-12 lbs., unless I'm drastically wrong on the contour. Where is the extra weight on a 40 gun?
Thanks in advance!!!
David
David Kiser <kiser403@mailcity.com>
NC, USA - Wednesday, September 22, 1999 at 02:43:18 (ZULU) (your host
address: 207.203.13.63)
Can you tell me about PKMS-7 on the SVD-98? Why a porro prism scope? Any advantages or features? A friend thinking of getting one to complement his newly acquired bolt action Baikal.
Also, anyone note that the Australian (Interfet) minimi's are all with optic sight? Wonder what and why, enquiring mind want to know.
see you,
Serri wading through the floods in the smiley city
Serri <Serri_ls_lithy@yahoo.com>
city in the strom, BKK, Thailand - Wednesday, September 22, 1999 at
12:27:00 (ZULU) (your host address: 192.94.3.4)
I have temporarily lost the ability to work on my PC at home. It will be fixed over the weekend without any loss of data, but until then I will not be able to respond to any of my email that I downloaded at home, nor action anything I have there (link requests, photos for the photo gallery etc.), both in my personal account listed here and the webmaster account.
I also access both accounts here at work and can thus respond to some of it from here, but those downloaded at home will have to stay over till next week or so. Please do not send again, as I will have it - just please be patient if I am slow in responding.
Damn, last week my screen blew, this week this, four weeks ago this work PC. Must be because I'm not shooting enough!
Marius
Marius Ferreira <mferreira@intekom.coza>
RSA - Wednesday, September 22, 1999 at 13:51:18 (ZULU) (your host address:
196.25.27.66)
Serri,
I thought that "minimi" was the real name of FN's 5.56 machine gun,
known as the M249 SAW within the US Military... least that's what an officer
told me.... ;-) Does "minimi" mean something is a language with which I'm
not familiar?
Marius,
I kinda feel guilty about the pics; though I hadn't posted them
often, and it's been awhile since I had, I feel responsible for starting
it (I hadn't seen them before I tried it...)
News,
In Scott Co., VA, they're about to start a coyote bounty... sounds
like a little extra cash in my pocket... I hope...
L8R,
Leslie <lnbright@juno.com>
TN-VA, USA - Wednesday, September 22, 1999 at 13:53:48 (ZULU) (your
host address: 216.98.93.155)
In my view guys come on here for advise on shooting, loading, products and schools. For whatever reason we have lost a great deal of knowledge in these areas over the past year. If we continue to police the site and stricktly control everything what we will be left with is "My Savage is better than your PSS, 45 versus 9mm and what bedding compound should I use" I have no problem with helping new guys, heck I love to, but why limit ourselves to the usual questions. I have made many friends on this site and from them came many more ideas. My equipment has been improved from suggestions and my slings are much better than before. All from contacts and discussion on the DR. Without it many things would still be needing improvement. Hugo recently put on a case for the Data Book. I sent off for one and am pleased. Very good product that I would not have seen without the DR. The product has made my job a little easier.
Now I have gone on long enough. I will do whatever the SC Staff wants in reelation to posting products on the DR, but I just wanted to put this out for you to think about.
M40 Rifle being heavy. It is so for several reasons. 1. Unertal scope is steel not aluminum. 2.Bbbl is almost a straight contour. 3. McMillan Stocks are solid fiberglass in action areas(much heavier than foam). The whole thing was designed to last in combat not be cheap. By the way the Marines are going to the M40A3 soon. It is similar with a McMillan A4 Stock
Now I am off in a few days to Storm Mountain, where two former DR Posters, Rod Ryan and Kent Gooch, teach excellent classes. Man does this place miss them!
Undude/Mike
Mike M. <Tactical@tacticaintervention.com>
Calif, USA - Wednesday, September 22, 1999 at 15:07:25 (ZULU) (your
host address: 205.188.200.53)
I think there is a grey area between saying I've got 100 copies of a new book for 29.99 for sale, and talking about products, improving items we use, or talking about something new that needs feed back.
I'm not sure where we should draw the line, but as mike said, like gun control, we can go all the way to the wall, and ban it all. I wouldn't have gotten Undude's sling if it were just listed in the Emporium... and the TRGT Log wouldn't be around very much for the same reason... maybe we can find a middle ground, without needing a hard line.
I also have to agree with Undude about the level of topics... we have been driftion away fron "Home country" for guite a while. Last year, I said something about it, and was "Flacked" hard for bringing it up.
I'll talk loading, and pistol, etc... but I'd really like us to get back to "Sniper Country"... and I miss the contributions and input from many who still read the DR (I get e-mail from them) but won't post anymore.
So on what the Undude said... Me too, in Spades.
'lito
Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Wednesday, September 22, 1999 at 15:44:26 (ZULU) (your host address:
208.249.180.125)
I gonna dive write in an try this fancy high follutin politic stuff and make a personal comment:
I personally enjoy seeing new products (and testing them even more!).
But the jist I get,(I may be {probably am} wrong) is not to load
up the DR with things that could be better placed elsewhere....
JT and Un-Dude gave us all a real shot in the arm with his ability to Hyperlink to a page and new product. Thats definately a Tango-India-Tango-Sierra idea and should be retained. And I don't make that particular comment about everything.
I gonna carry on as usual, and hope that you all of you will do the same. I would enjoy seeing some of the "Oldtimers" posting again those singed wings should have feathers again. MINE DO :-)
At least you didn't start collectively start singing the praises of Ruu, Ruuug, Ruuu-gg......
You can e-mail any or all of us with your comments, to any of the staffers, any time
Me, I just make a feeble attempt at writing, and enjoying the Roaster oops Roster.
Chao!
peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
BIG CITY, BY-GAWD, USA - Wednesday, September 22, 1999 at 17:21:29
(ZULU) (your host address: 205.188.193.182)
But, it seems far fetched to refer to what has been on this site as advertisements. References to things other than maybe where you can get a deal on ammo, or hyping the Carlos shoot [both great info], are only to equipment made by shooters to help shooters. Take that info away, and you give one less reason to visit the site, imho.
Old Dog
Bruce <Bruce@mannlawfirm.com>
USA - Wednesday, September 22, 1999 at 17:23:15 (ZULU) (your host address:
208.16.162.10)
Now, can't we get back to talking about kilts, sheep, and guns?
Bdouglas <bpearson@bc.cc.ca.us>
Bakersfield, Ca, USA - Wednesday, September 22, 1999 at 17:57:45 (ZULU)
(your host address: 136.168.217.60)
I think the line has to be drawn where there is a situation that the person doing all the commentary has a personal finacial gain by endorsing their product here on the Roster.
Sure, it's probably not out of line to make an annoucement that, "ACME Co. is pleased to announce the addition of Widget A to our product line.Please, drop by and visit our site at www.yadayadayada.com,".
However, when it gets into a situation where individuals prepetuate a topic to death just to gain a little more product exposure, then IMHO that's when it begins to draw the line.
Now, I'm not blaming or naming anyone here.I think we all know who is doing this and who isn't.It's not like it's happening every day or anything, but I see Marius's point though.
Otherwise, how is this situation any different from all the SPAM that comes through our e-mail ? I really don't want to sift through all kinds of pseudo-advertisements just to read posts from people who are here for the sharing of information.
If you want your products to be discussed here, get someone to do
a review on it for posting.That will give you the attention you are looking
for.
Perhaps it might be time to explore the possibility of opening different chat rooms for different interests ? Maybe one for handloading for example.
As for people not posting here anymore? C'est la vie, mes amis ! People's interests change, they become disinterested, whatever the reason.Shit happens !
I've been on this site for over 2 1/2 years now, and I've seen a lot of good people come and go over that time.It's to the point now where there's only a half dozen or so names that I see post here on a regular basis that I remember from the first time I logged onto Sniper Country.
It doesn't matter who you are or what you've done.If you leave this site because you're not happy here; then WE all lose (shit disturbers and anti-gunners excluded of course!).
Anyway, perhaps a little change around here won't be so bad? Just food for thought.
Jeff Babineau <j.babineau@ns.sympatico.ca>
Truro, N.S., Canada - Wednesday, September 22, 1999 at 18:35:48 (ZULU)
(your host address: 142.176.68.141)
Hans <vasa@hhcn.prn.bc.ca>
BC, Canada - Wednesday, September 22, 1999 at 19:24:19 (ZULU) (your
host address: 142.27.219.240)
First, let me say that I understand where Marius et al are coming from. The download time on the Roster can get very annoying when there are *large* inline pictures in it. This is part of the reason that I used thumbnail sized stuff when I posted. Those pictures will cease as well per his new rule.
Having said that, I agree with the majority here that learning of new products and new websites even new reviews and whatever else is a big draw for the DR, at least it was for me before I got started in on making sites for this community. I enjoy the pointers to other places be they 'competing' sites or just new product pages.
Now for the shocker: It appears Marius does too.
Marius and I exchanged email in the last 24 hour where I asked him for specifics on where he draws the line. Marius, you are welcome to post the second to last email we exchanged if you desire. I think it spells out the limits quite well and though I'd like to use thumbnails occasionally, I personally think its reasonable.
The bottom line from the mail exchange was that DR posters will still be allowed to post announcements of new products, announcements of new sites, and pointers to other places to get information etc. His big concern seemed to be inline images and ads for the sake of ads for already well known products not new information dissemination.
This was heartening to me as I think that both this community and the sites in question bennefit from a symbiotic relationship when we all come together here.
In fact in the next couple of weeks, you'll get to see a new announcement of yet another sniper-related site that I am putting together. All with the blessings of Marius On High (tm). :-)
PeteR, thanks for the nice words about how I taught peopel to do off-site links here. I am honored to be considered T**S... Uh I think. As long as you don't think that of me and also expect me to wear a lacey kilt I think we can still be friendly.
Speaking wholly and completely for myself,
JT <tenarius@memorableplaces.com>
USA - Wednesday, September 22, 1999 at 20:25:17 (ZULU) (your host address:
204.156.137.61)
After hearing how Andy Webber, Rod, and "The Gooch" did this summer... I'm thinking of going up next summer and shooting the "F" class... It'll give them one more guy to beat!
Do you'z guys know anything about it, when it is, rules and info, do I need gun permits to get into Canadia, Yadda, Yadda?
'lito.
Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Wednesday, September 22, 1999 at 21:36:36 (ZULU) (your host address:
208.249.180.29)
The optic's are the same as the standard Steyr AUG (Aussie designation is the F88, for their Aug's), so the magnification is 1.5.
Chris
Chris <cafarr@excite.com>
NZ - Wednesday, September 22, 1999 at 22:24:36 (ZULU) (your host address:
203.97.45.229)
Marius has since clarified the original request and all seems ok with me.
I come on this site for the friends and not to just push my products. The guys here are the reason I have products. I stioll make the stuff in my spare time because guys wanted them. When guys do not want them I will stop making them. I hardly depend on this for making any money. Not even recovered what it cost me for half the expenses yet. Anyone that thinks any of the guys posting on here are making money has another thing coming. Non of the guys who have posted here are. Now if a big company came on here and listed the specials of the day that would be different. The easy thing I guess would be to sell my sling to the highest bidder and just teach folks to shoot. Food for thought.
Mike
MikeM <Tactical@tacticalintervention.com>
Calif, USA - Wednesday, September 22, 1999 at 22:39:37 (ZULU) (your
host address: 205.188.197.34)
We use them on our C9 (FN MINIMI/M249, Etc), same unit as on our
C7 (M16); the Elcan combat site, called C-79 Optical sight. I usually take
the unit off when live-firing, it's OK for picking out targets initially,
but once the link starts flying, I just wind up looking over the scope
and following the tracer. The CF (Canadian Forces) have issued a notice
on the "dangers of tunnel vision with the C79/C9 combination". Seems somebody
got shot during training. That should tell you something.
Tony M <tmacke@ibm.net>
BC, Canada - Wednesday, September 22, 1999 at 22:40:33 (ZULU) (your
host address: 142.25.150.105)
The sniper competition Andy,Rod,Gooch,and Wendy participated in were the CFSAC matches not the DCRA.
It is my understanding that "F Class" is part of the DCRA target rifle matches.
As far as the gun thing in Canada, it is my impression that you do need a permit to bring any weapons into Canada.Perhaps Gooch can fill you in a little better on this.
Anyway, I have a 1-800 number kicking around here for The Canadian Firearms Center.When I get home from work tonight I'll post it here for you.They should be able to answer any and all questions/concerns that you may have.
By the way, check out www.dcra.com for more info concerning the matches.
I've been kind of toying around with the idea of going up there myself next year.Andy,Wendy,and several others went from our local club this year.They all spoke of what a good time they had.Both on and off the range.If I'm not mistaken, I think I remember saying that the weather was lousey this year; with a lot of rain.
I'll get back to you here shortly...
Jeff Babineau <j.babineau@ns.sympatico.ca>
Truro, N.S., CANADA - Wednesday, September 22, 1999 at 22:41:40 (ZULU)
(your host address: 142.176.68.119)
CDC <criscurt@isu.edu>
USA - Wednesday, September 22, 1999 at 22:52:53 (ZULU) (your host address:
134.50.237.100)
If you want to, check out their web site at: www.cfc-ccaf.gc.ca
Hope this helps ...
Jeff Babineau <j.babineau@ns.sympatico.ca>
Truro, N.S., Canada - Thursday, September 23, 1999 at 00:05:57 (ZULU)
(your host address: 142.177.57.60)
Just checking in, not a lot of news breakin' on my end.
I am building a rifle, call it 'beanfield', hell it'll shoot in sunflower
too, I suppose. 300 Win Mag, off a 721 action, 24 inch sporter weight cut
rifled barrel, saddled on an H-S sporter stock (
which I will Bisonite the bejesus out of)I suppose I'll true the
face of the receiver and lap the bolt lugs, but she'll still be a classic
721. I don't think we've built a rifle from a 721, not that I can remember
anyway, so that is what is givin me a woody nowadays.
PeteR:
You e-mailed me on h-1000 a couple weeks ago, hell, I don't think we have used that, as far as I can remember anyway. Oh, and since you're such a big Ruugaaaaah fanatic (heheh) I'll give all these Ruahgahuamaniacs a thought to digest.
R@#$&*@ rifle users:
It is a fact that Ruger's shoot better in the dark. Better than in the light of day anyway. So when ya zero, zero in zero light, it just doesn't get any better.
mrbullet:
I have a doe tag, East River, better than nothin' eh?? I will be in your vicinity around the opener for those wiley pheasants, vacationing in sunny ESD for about 2 weeks, so I may be lookin' ya up if you have any spare time anyway. Hell, shootin' birds gets boring after a while, especially when ya limit out by 12:30 PM everyday, heheh. I'll try to get a hold of ya beforehand, may have to tip a few over a discussion of a sneak suit.
all:
I need some feedback on these Hornady .308 168gr match moly's, whatdya think of 'em ladies?? I threw 8 of em in a 2" group at 200 yds with a BLR(dad's gun), went to Rem core lokt 150 gr and nada, not even close. (Pat, I shot all day in a 35mph crosswind, 2 weeks ago, just couldn't get anything to print, went through 60+ rds, the last 8 shots were in the late evening when the wind quit) I'd have to check the bore/groove dimensions, but I'd say that barrel likes heavy bullets. Just hated the 150's at 2-300 yds.
later
JR <mrpink@rapidnet.com>
rapid city, sd, USA - Thursday, September 23, 1999 at 01:13:59 (ZULU)
(your host address: 12.13.117.95)
You know, you are right when you say that everyone can have their own opinion.That's the great thing when you have a mind of your own !
As for making money? Hell man, if you're going to all this trouble to lose money, then I got some real nice ocean front property in Arizona I'd like to sell you (hey, just kiddin' there big fella).
I wish you do make a good return on your hard earned efforts.Anything else would be a complete shame.Hey man, "profit" ain't a dirty word to me.
I really don't know you except from your posts here.You seem like a very genuine and helpful person.If what you said was comming out of someone elses mouth I'd be tempted to say, "You can't shit a shitter," as the saying goes.
If you want to know how to compete in Canadian rifle shooting I'll be releasing a 10 volume set of hard cover books that will go over the entire topic.I'll tell you what, I'll sell it to you today for just $350 and I'll throw in genuine Saskatchewan seal skin drag bag just because you're a nice guy.Act now! while supplies last!
Now onto more serious matters.The real secret to winning a Canadian competition is the ability to hold your liquor better than the rest of your competitors the night before the shoot.I know, it's hard to believe but it's true.Just ask Rod and Gooch.
Now that I've let the cat out of the bag I'm sure as hell certain that I'm gonna get tons of hate mail over this.I just hope you and 'lito appreciate the fact that I've just revealed a national secret and I've probably just endangered Canadian National Security by telling you this.
Geez, the stuff I won't do for you guys...
Jeff Babineau <j.babineau@ns.sympatico.ca>
Truro, N.S., Canada - Thursday, September 23, 1999 at 03:25:13 (ZULU)
(your host address: 142.177.78.47)
Last year a man from Bozeman MT. sent a letter to the local paper saying that president Klinton should be tried for treason over the China Money contributions. He was Promptly arrest by the SS and tried for threatening the presidents life or some such garbage.
Another man called into the Micheal Raygun talk show and said that if Klinton is tried for treason and found guilty, He should be shot, the punishment for treason, Micheal promptly notified the SS as well saying the same garbage the man had threatand to kill the president.
Now maybe its me, but A
Partison <Partison@hotmail.com>
Missoula, Mt., USA - Thursday, September 23, 1999 at 04:51:05 (ZULU)
(your host address: 199.96.42.139)
Yol Bolson
Partison
Partison <Partison@hotmail.com>
Missoula, Mt., USA - Thursday, September 23, 1999 at 04:56:00 (ZULU)
(your host address: 199.96.42.139)
So, rather than me type up all the stuff here again and forget some, I'll do as JT suggested and just cut and paste our email exchange here. His comments are prefixed by "}" and mine not.
=============
First of all, not to worry, no need to apologise. If one
doesn't try
new things one will never know, will one? I did not have
a problem when
you announced Mike's site on the Duty Roster. Actually I
thought it was
the correct thing to do, since he has been involved with
SC so much and,
I *hope*, has to thank the site for at least a little bit
of his
success.
Now, rather than scroll down to read and back up to
answer I'm going to
insert my comments in amongst yours, so read further.
JT wrote:
}
} Greetings Marius,
}
} First, off since I am the culprit that did much of the
posting, I apologize
} for starting a trend that has turned out to be a bit
unwelcome. :-(
}
} Having said that I need a little clarification.
}
} You said not to post 'ads', but noted that the way that
I mentioned the
} TRGT databook review was okay. You also mentioned that
announcing Mike's
} site was acceptable. I am a little confused as to me
anything that gets
} people to give you more pageviews is what I think of as
an 'ad' in this
} business. I need to find out your definition of ads.
}
I define an add as "I am selling...". Those entries that
appear in the
Emporium are ads - most of them anyway. Trigger50's
post, describing
his data book and why it is such a good buy, is an ad.
TRGTs entry,
with the graphic, detailing the new cover for their data
book is an ad.
I do not consider posts that say "we now have additional
information
that might be of interest to you" as an ad.
} What I am trying to get a handle on is just what *IS*
acceptable insofar as
} announcing things of interest on the site under the
Duty Roster and what is
} not.
}
} Here is what I am thinking about when I write this:
Currently Mike is
} developing a couple new products and putting up new
reviews.
}
Good - waiting to see them.
} When a brand new product comes out is it okay to
mention it on the roster
} at all?
Yes - by all means. As long as it is mention. If you
want to post a
detailed post, describing the product in full, maybe
including instream
photos, that should go to the Emporium.
[START NOTE: In later discussions went as follow:
} So instream is okay on the Emporium? Okay thats good
to know.
} Also I am heartened to learn that youre not clamping
down all mention of
} new products. I'll be brief in new descriptions.
Yes, on the Emporium it is almost "anything goes", as
long it is
firearms related and not illegal. It might be a good
idea to include an
indicator in the subject if you're posting graphics
links, but that is
not mandatory.
Clamping down on mentioning new products? How will we
know about them
if they're not mentioned?
END NOTE]
} If yes is actually linking to it prohibited? Is that
what constitutes
} making it an 'ad'?
}
No and no. As long as the link is a link to the
site/page, and not an
instream photo. Of course this will have to be on feel
as well. If we
get more and more of "I now also sell/make ..." from all
posters, making
up a significant percentage of posts, we'll have to look
at it again.
} Is it okay to say "we just opened a new section dealing
with XXX product"?
}
Yes.
} Is it okay to mention that a new product review has
been posted?
}
Yes - by all means. That I see as conveying information,
not
advertising.
} I also need to ask what the limitations are on
announcing new sites that
} have direct relation to the sniper community. I am
presently working on a
} site for Jerry Rice (Nor Cal Perecision) who is a
wonderful riflesmith and
} a real decent chap. He makes custom Remington 700
based tactical rifles.
} (You just posted a review of one.) He has never had a
web presence before.
}
} My question is - when a new site is opened is it okay
to mention that they
} now exist or does that fall under the prohibited ads
rule?
}
By all means announce it, and please tell me as well.
Then I can add
him to our links, and actually link him into the article
as well. I now
very seldom have the opportunity to surf to look for new
sites, articles
of interest and such. Most of the links I get to add are
either sent to
me direct as "please link to my site at xxx", or come as
part of a
message, or as entries to the Duty Roster. So, if they
are not
announced I will not know about them either.
} Finally, from time to time I have been known to post
links to other places
} where people could find products they are asking about.
Is that considered
} an ad?
}
No - it is not. Same as above.
} I guess I just need to have some specific parameters
and limitations
} codified. I'll not break your rules willingly, I just
need to know where
} you draw the line.
Which was why I left it, hoping that, if somebody did
copy you, they'd
do it all the way, and not those big images. In the past
pictures have
also been posted, for example one time three pics about
sling
positions. I left them as well.
}
} As far as inline images, yea - I was always careful to
make tiny ones and
} use them. The moment I saw that Big ol picture of the
rifle on some guys
} floor I knew a rule like this would be coming down.
}
As you say. Unfortunately, allow something and someone
is invariably
going to "abuse" it, whether intentionally or not.
} Thanks for the time, and thanks for a site where I have
learned quite a lot.
}
I can assure you, you could not have learned more than I
have. I just
happen to be the nerd behind the keyboard, that is all.
:-)
Take care, and keep up the good work.
} JT
}
==================
And a last comment I made to JT this morning in replying to him:
---------
I try and make the Duty Roster, and the whole of SC, a
fun place,
without too many rules and regulations. I want people to
enjoy being
there, not worry about which rules they're going to break
when doing
something.
---------
I hope this clarifies the issue, and get the message across that I do not want to limit discussions. If I do that, where will Sniper Country be? Nowhere.
Marius
Marius Ferreira <mferreira@intekom.co.za>
Pretoria, RSA - Thursday, September 23, 1999 at 09:01:28 (ZULU) (your
host address: 196.25.27.66)
As usual, "let me just quickly do this" has not been the best way. Like the rhetorical question goes: "Why is never never time to do something properly the first time, but always enough time to come back later to fix it up?"
I apologise for any inconvenience and heartburn this note might have caused, but let me assure you that it was meant with the best of intentions.
Like Mike says, we make mistakes. If we don't (or *I* in this case, as I take full responsibility, not having consulted with the others on this before posting that note) make mistakes we'll be perfect, and I am very far from that. A quote I have written down somewhere says something like: "People who don't make mistakes don't make much else either". Hopefully I make less mistakes than I make good, and hopefully the mistakes I do make have far less impact than does the good things I do.
---
Now onto other related things. Mention has been made as to old regulars not really posting here any more. This is a worry to us as well as, like JeffB(?) said, when anyone does not post here anymore it is a loss to us all. Some that has left I basically know why, others I don't, as one just sees their names not appearing any more.
I just make a call here and now to anyone. If you are unhappy about something, please don't just take off and never come back, or maybe read but not post. Please contact me, or one of the other members, first with the reasons. Let us see whether it is something we can do something about. Some things we will be able to address, some not.
If it is the way I comb my hair - tough shit. If it is the way I address some isses, like the above for example, let us talk about it. If it is about the way some people discourse on the Duty Roster, let us talk about it. That sort of thing is a bit more difficult to handle, as this is NOT a moderated forum, just slightly sometimes :-), but if we discuss it we can maybe come up with some sort of solution, or at least a compromise.
Please just don't come with an all-out attack, as you'll not get defence, but a counter-attack. Just make it a note in reasonable tones. And remember I'm open to critisism, as long as we can achieve something by discussing it.
Now let us hope that this time I expressed myself properly and clearly.
Marius
Marius Ferreira <mferreira@intekom.co.za>
RSA - Thursday, September 23, 1999 at 11:03:30 (ZULU) (your host address:
196.25.27.66)
Marius - some of the roster readers may want to post a link to a picture, article, etc - BUT not have a place to make that picture link accessible. Weellll, we can make a special repository for roster reader uploads - aside from the SniperCountry internals - where they can upload their quick pictures, etc - then place a link to that from the duty roster.
Ken :)
Ken <ImpactArea@snipercountry.com>
Nokesville, Va, USA - Thursday, September 23, 1999 at 11:17:25 (ZULU)
(your host address: 209.84.196.39)
EXCELLENT idea. Now if you can only tell me how that is done? How will I pick up the pics off their PC and store on your server? We'll have to talk on the scripts behind that. If you don't mind the space I don't mind putting it up there.
Marius
Marius Ferreira <mferreira@intekom.com>
RSA - Thursday, September 23, 1999 at 11:49:58 (ZULU) (your host address:
196.25.27.66)
Ok, let's try Intel 101. Quickly answer what of each letter in SALUTE?
Just for a change,
Serri in the rain, rain and rain BKK but, I love it.
Serri <Serri_ls_lithy@yahoo.com>
8^), soaking wet, Thailand - Thursday, September 23, 1999 at 13:03:23
(ZULU) (your host address: 192.94.3.4)
Am I close enough ?? Haven't thought of that acronym in quite some
time!
Out Here
Will <rogue308@mindspring.com>
War Eagle !! , Alabama, USA - Thursday, September 23, 1999 at 13:49:05
(ZULU) (your host address: 199.174.135.16)
STAY SAFE!
peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
BIG CITY, BY-GAWD, USA - Thursday, September 23, 1999 at 14:08:50 (ZULU)
(your host address: 205.188.193.173)
A quick visit to www.dcra.ca should offer any information for the 2K matches.
The sniper matches take place during CFSAC and the "F" Class matches
during CFRC. These matches take place about two weeks apart. Even though
Keith Cunningham gave me a rundown on the sniper matches, my failing memory
won't allow the time and number of shots involved. During the CFRC you
can shoot sniper type conditions on fullbore targets until you are ready
to drop. This starts with the Canadian Long Range Challenge (80 shots +
sighters @900M over two days). This match pays real $ (well, at least Canadian
$). The grand agg. lasts six more days, with team matches thrown in at
times. A special .223 match takes place every evening that includes "F"
Class conditions and refers to ANY .224 centerfire for "F" class. As an
example, J.J. Conway of San Antonio, TX used a .224 Vais. Check the website
and
see how this energetic 75 year old wonder got along!
"F" Class allows any front rest (bipod, pedestal, or sandbag), sand bag rear, and any caliber/cartridge combination that will remain within the range template. In use will be anything from a .223 to an 8MM of some type (check DCRA site for caliber/bullet/velocity rules).
Accomodations are $6.00 per day and there is no competitor marking during CFRC. A very leisure week, unless shooting all the side matches, and a place second to none in learning to cope with long range conditions.
This year the conditions were quite mild, and a real trigger pulling contest (most of the time). It AIN'T always that way!
You don't need a "big boomer" to win either. The first three places in "F" Class this year were 22-250 (80 grain), 6BR (105 grain), and .223 Rem. (80 grain). The CLRC being won by a 6.5X.308AP (Ackley-Poulin - 140 Berger).
If contemplating TR (target rifle) or TR-O (target rifle - optical), Connaught is also one of the finest places in the world to compete with the .223 or .308. Those of us involved in "F" Class are allowed to shoot alongside, as long as we offer no disturbance to the TR or TR-O competitor. Also, for those inclined, black powder cartridge (long range) and vintage military matches are offered. Something for nearly everyone.
Bill Wylde <k9wxr@rr1.net>
Cool - SE, ILLINOIS, USA - Thursday, September 23, 1999 at 14:40:46
(ZULU) (your host address: 208.132.114.100)
Theres is a bit of a difference between selling data gathered as a Govmt employee and data from a private corporation. Most (but not all) of the info that could be gathered as employee of the govmt would probably have gone into files and buried in "dead" storage. Why not put it to use? Most info is available under the freedom of information act anyway, and if it isnt available its classified material. Anyone who tries to commercialize this kind of info has more to worry about than violating simple information rights.
Many people use military FM's, TM's, govt documents or excerpts from these to train or teach others, sometimes for profit. As long as its not classified - so what?? I say let these people profit from there actions. They usually have to take the raw info and work with it, filter it and make it fit their needs. They should profit from the work that they have put into this.
There is a very big difference between General Motors and the State
or Federal Govt and your responsibilities as an employee of one or the
other.
Yes, GM can sue you for theft of sensitve information, and you as
well can sue them for breach of contract or various other things that may
happen. Most Federal Employees have very little legal recourse when it
comes to the Govt.
Just my opinion...
ColinC
ColinC <DeltaVKPS@hotmail.com>
Omaha, NE, USA - Thursday, September 23, 1999 at 16:44:39 (ZULU) (your
host address: 137.48.18.61)
Recently someone I shoot with told me that I could get more accuracy from the old gas-gun (Springfield Armory M1A national match) by running Lapua 168 BTHP's instead of the Sierras that I've been getting for years. Says the hollow point is better formed, more consistent. Any thoughts? My rifle likes the Sierras SLIGHTLY better than the Hornady, MUCH better than the Speer. Never tried Lapua though.
I noticed someone shooting a 7-08 and started talking to him. He said that he chose it over the 308 because you get a better BC for the same weight (approx). He shot the 162BTHP versus my 168's. I can see (since the case is the same) that the velocities shouldn't be too much different for the same chamber pressure. If this is the case, do you guys choose the 308 for the capability of running heavier bullets or what? I just shoot service rifle matches, so there was no question which caliber I would use.
I notice a whole bunch of youse guys love that VARGET powder. If you think that I could use it (the pressure curve is correct for a M1A) I will get a can and try it. Am I the only guy that likes VihtaVourhi? And along the same lines, I was told to never use bench rest primers, as the M1A has a floating firing pin and there was danger of a slam fire. Been using regular Winchester large rifles. The question to you experts now becomes: was I given bad advice and I can use the BR primers, and if I do will I see any benefit?
Marius: Wouldn't touch this issue with someone elses finger. You're doing a fine job. Just please don't pass a rule against people asking for help on stupid questions, or I will be forced outta here! :-O
Pablito: looked over that stuff you sent, now I wish I was headed out there myself. Need an observer for next year? Looks like it would be worth the trip and then some! Good luck with the sheep......
And to the rest of youse guys that have helped me out, I SURE DO
appreciate it. It's great to be able to ask questions of people that actually
"been there, done that". Sure beats re-inventing the wheel with all the
associated mistakes! Please know that you are appreciated!
Bravo <Bravo762@yahoo.com>
Cedar City, Utah, USA - Thursday, September 23, 1999 at 17:43:06 (ZULU)
(your host address: 12.9.223.165)
These rifles need 12,000 to 14,000 psi at the gas port to function realiably. Slower powders will result in high slide velocities, and beat the crap out of the reciever... faster powders will result in slow slide velocites, and poor case ejection, even when the presure is high enough to crater the primers... I can't speak for the Vahootie-Tootie powders, they are rare around here, and mostly list price.
Sure, you can be a spotter next year, but why not be a shooter...
It's the "Woodstock" of sniperdom.
Pablito
Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Thursday, September 23, 1999 at 18:18:37 (ZULU) (your host address:
208.249.180.46)
On the 7mm-08 they have a lot higher BC so they fly better but the
big advantage is the wind bucking ability of these bullets compared to
the .30s. The 6.5 is even better with a BC in the 560 to 630 area compared
to 460 for the .30s. In a 20 mph wind there is like 4 to 5 feet difference
in wind drift at 1000yds, plus there is a lot less recoil so you get the
best of both worlds. The guys shooting the 260s and the 6.5-08s are enjoying
the same ballistics as the guys shooting a 300wm.
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Thursday, September 23, 1999 at 19:17:20 (ZULU) (your host address:
207.221.188.130)
First his willingness to clarify his original post.
Second his willingness to admit he made a mistake in presentation instead of trying to save face. Not enough people do that.
I have been a moderator on electronic lists and its well nigh impossible to please everyone.
I am also with Pablito and others who wish that this forum would turn back to its roots and more talk about the main subject was present. I too wish some of the old regulars would come back to the Duty Roster. When I first started reading this forum there was a lot more in the way of 'meat' [not sheep meat peteR] that we could learn from and on-topic discussion. Perhaps some of the old guard might be talked into returning and giving it another try? This student misses reading your posts.
Have fun at Carlos everyone. It's for a great cause! Wish I could
go just to observe. :-)
JT - MemorablePlaces.com
<tenarius@memorableplaces.com>
USA - Thursday, September 23, 1999 at 19:52:16 (ZULU) (your host address:
204.156.137.61)
On AR's in Canada.Check with customs first.Canadian firearms law treats AR's and handguns the same.They are both what is refered to as restricted weapons.In essence they are a controlled weapon.
DO NOT bring 20 rd. mags here unless you'd like to spend some time in prison.They are considered prohibited weapons, so you can get into some real doo doo with them.Magazine capacity for semi-auto centerfire rifle calibres is limmitted to only 5 rds.
Call the Canadian Firearms Center and ask tell them what you are planning to do.They will inform you of the procedures necessary to bring these weapons into Canada.I posted this number here last night, and I'll post it here again.Their # is 1-800-731-4000.
I don't want to see anyone get into any trouble at the border.That's the last thing you need to happen.
Jeff Babineau <j.babineau@ns.sympatico.ca>
Truro, N.S., Canada - Thursday, September 23, 1999 at 19:52:39 (ZULU)
(your host address: 142.176.68.154)