Sniper Country Duty Roster

July 1999



Forgot to mention in my earlier post..The students that attend this course will be required to engage targets from 50-1000 yards. After this class..The 1000 yrd range may be open to the public for shooting? Anyone interested in that ?Let me know.
Bobby WHITTINGTON <WHATACOP@AOL.COM>
Grandfield, OK, USA - Thursday, July 01, 1999 at 00:03:45 (ZULU)
Guys, thanks for responding to my post about semi-auto .308.
I posted the message because a coworker has a pre-ban (1984) H&K91 with telescoping stock, bipod, bayonet for sale for $1500.00. Plus I came across a SAR-4800 at a gun. I've always wanted a semi-auto in .308 I was trying to get some info. I don't see myself using this rifle on a battlefield, I just want a .308 battle rifle for my collection.

thanks

Andrew
Andrew <mysig@fast.net>
Broomall, PA, USA - Thursday, July 01, 1999 at 00:07:11 (ZULU)


I am A sniper from New Zealand and I been trying to learn more skill to fine up my trade. I know it not some people idea job but it is mine
Thank you.
Matthew Kent <emooszac@yahoo.com>
Lower Hutt, Wellington, New Zealand - Thursday, July 01, 1999 at 00:11:34 (ZULU)
Mike, et al:

I'll weigh in on the H&K 91 vs FN FAL issue. In my mind, there is no comparison between the two. The FN FAL is the finest battle rifle in the world IMHO. The weapon can be tuned to perform to specifications far beyond the average to good shooter and is a comfortable weapon to shoot AND carry. The H&K is like handling a chunk of railroad iron for all the balance it has. I agree with B. Rogers that it is, no doubt, a fine LE special weapon. But LE types don't carry anything very far. I have a matchgrade FN FAL that stock shoots well out to 850 yds which is as far as I have shot it and it certainly made tactical hits with ANY junk ammo I put in it. The SAR 4800 is another preferred choice over th H&Ks for durability, balance and performance out of the box. None of these weapons are known for their discreet ejection of brass.

On ops in SEA and Latin America, I carried my bolt gun broken down and cased under my pack. My One One observer and I both carried CAR versions of the M-16 with 220 rounds as basic load. My One One did not carry any .308 and I only carried 20 rounds. I only engaged is selected target engagement and never in support of line ops where suppressing long range fire was employed. Times and mission parameters have changed, so my operational approach may be out of date.

De Oppresso Liber
James R. Jarrett <jrjarrett@hotmail.com>
New Mexico, USA - Thursday, July 01, 1999 at 01:27:07 (ZULU)


As hard as it is to say, $1,500 for a HK91 is a decent deal these days. I once traded 3 NIB 91's for a Bluetick, and I thought then I took advantage of the guy...now, speculators have driven the price way up. In my experience, dealing with H&K on a part problem is nearly as enjoyable as having your eye thumbed.

Although I am biased, if I were you I would pay B. Wylde to perform his magic on an AR. Then take the AR and bet your friend your gun against his HK in a shooting match at 300 meters. He will surely take the bet, because of course the 308 is far more accurate than the 223 [?]. After you spank him, you will have spent less than $1,500, and you will own 1 of the world's finest guns AND the HK91:)

Whatever you decide, have fun with it...we are just renting this stuff for awhile:)

Old Dog
Bruce <Bruce@mannlawfirm.com>
USA - Thursday, July 01, 1999 at 01:37:04 (ZULU)


JR, Good to hear from you. That rifle is going to be really tested. Thanks for the kind words on the A4 Review. Trouble is both H.S. and McMillan make such fine stocks. I hope no one else comes along and makes something in the same league. You guys will find me against a wall talking to myself tring to make a decision as to which one to use.

James J., If a guy of your history agrees with me I cant be stopped.

Now if Old Dog could just come up with a SAR4800 to trade me. We cant have FAL's or SAR48's in the Peoples Republic of Calif. With some great boltguns on the way. A few AR's and a FAL/SAR4800 I will be set. Find me one Bruce I have several Sheep all packaged to send you in trade.

The Undude/Mike
Mike M. <DMMDNLN@AOL.COM>
Calif, USA - Thursday, July 01, 1999 at 03:31:12 (ZULU)


Hey heres something that I've been awondering about??
How do military and L.E. snipers carry their ammo??
I mean do they through it in their pocket (just kidding) or in mtm box or some kind of holder and how much would you take?? ( I know this would depend on the mission, but the least amount you would leave home with out )
What if you were using a 300win mag or 338 Laupa mag??
Do they use a Tac vest of some sort and what kind?? or do they use 782 gear (LBE of you army guys) to carry their gear??
How about carrying a side arm on your vest or some place else??

Inspiring minds want to know.................BigGunn................

BigGunn <meghan@penn.com>
Mtn.Country..........In the cool of the evening here in the almost burnt up state of..., Pennsylvania, USA - Thursday, July 01, 1999 at 03:39:12 (ZULU)


Does anybody have a load worked up for the 155gr A-MAX bullets for 308 or any place to start at?
C. Warner <cwarner741@aol.com>
Bowling Green, KY, USA - Thursday, July 01, 1999 at 04:23:27 (ZULU)
James/MIke ;Glad to know your opinion on the FAL. It's one of those things I never see much around here. I had some preconceived and likely faulty opinions about it. Someday maybe I'll get a chance at one.
The HK brass head is beat up a bit by the bolt face construction and it cuts grooves all over the cartridge. We;ve discussed it at length. I guess I've reloaded a ton of it but it isn't pretty. No problems with the M1a1 that I have seen. HK is a case of it's own for sure.
The only thing worse balanced is a UZI. (but it's a fine machine gun).
About 45 grains should start ok for the 155 grain A-max with Varget the powder. .308.
Bruce; If I didn't know better I'd swear you are attached to the Wylde gun! Now don't be usin that thing on them Illinois Rino's. It ain't big enough! Didya guys see the American Rifleman article on the AR-15's this month? Some good stuff in there I thought!
Big Gunn;Good question, This should be a good topic.
B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Thursday, July 01, 1999 at 04:57:14 (ZULU)
Just my $.02 worth on semi rifles.

I've got an AR-10(t) that out of the box will out shoot the M-1A national match I sold to buy it. My best 100 yard group to date is 10rnds into 9/16". And I'm still breaking in the barrel. Not a single malfunction in 60rnds. For a semi-auto, I cant say enough good things about this rifle.
Bruce <BCqc@aol.com>
USA - Thursday, July 01, 1999 at 05:38:43 (ZULU)


Hello you all !

B.Rogers: Unfortunately I have no pictures of my gun yet, but during the summer I will take some and scan them to a file. Sooner or later pictures will be available in the internet. In the meantime you can go to Dakota“s homepages. My rifle looks quite a bit like the Dakota Longbow, although my version is lefthanded, the stock is black and a the removable magazine can be seen. Also the scope mounts in my rifle are different. Sizewise both guns are the same, barrel length around 28", barrel thickness around 1", total length around 52" and weight around 15 pounds. It was not our idea to duplicate or copy the Longbow but when you start to develop a big 338 Lapua rifle in a McMillan A2 stock the end result is pretty much like the Longbow.

Nhatrang62: You spoke of Norma Lockbase. It probably is/was Lapua Lockbase. But anyways for everybody“s information: Norma, Lapua, Vihtavuori and the Norwegian Raufoss of Raufoss Multipurpose ammo fame have created a new company/conglomerate called Nammo. For the time being nothing has changed but it is entirely possible that some restructuring might happen within the concern. My fear is that Norma being the biggest powder producer of these companies may overtake Vihtavuori and that would be a pity as Vihtavuori“s powders are pretty good ones. Funny thing is that Norma produces also cases for 338 Lapua Mag and in a sense the conglomerate is competing with itself. In any case the idea behind these restructurings is to create one big powder/ammo/bullet company that can survive in international competition. Hopefully they do not forget us sport shooters totally. Nammo has home pages and their address is www.nammo.fi

Torsten: Thank you for your e-mail. I think that I will have enough sight seeing to do even though we can not meet next week. The last time I was in Berlin, it was May 1989, around six months before Der Mauer fall down. It is very interesting to see how the eastern parts have developed in the last 10 years. Last time I didn“t like the atmosphere in the DDR/East-Berlin at all.

Take care

Hexa
Hexa <juhola@luukku.com>
Helsinki, Finland - Thursday, July 01, 1999 at 07:53:33 (ZULU)


HK G3 vs. FN-FAL: Okay, before I start, I own an FN-FAL and I love it dearly. SO I might be a bit biased...
Having shot the G3 and the FAL a lot, I prefer the FAL over the G3, eventhough I'm on the brink of buying a G3 to add to my collection. RECOIL: the recoil of the FAL is much more smooth then the G3's. This is partly because the bolt+carrier SLAMS into the buffer in the rear of the receiver. There is no way of adjusting the action to make it stop doing so. In the FAL you can simulate this but closing the gas-regulator, but it's much more fun to tune the regulator just right, so the gun saves your shoulder and your brass.
BRASS: The brass out of my FAL has an occasional dent at the case-mouth wch is taken out during reloading but sure weakens the brass. The G3's I've shot ALWAYS dent the brass, mostly somewhere halfway down the case, where the dent won't come out during sizing. HK sells a nice buffer you can mount on the ejection-port that'll save your brass. Just remenber that the extraction in the G3 is rather ..... blunt. This will limit your brass-life a bit.
User friendlyness: Why on earth did they place the charging handle of the G3 that far to the front? I always have to move in a somewhat funny position in order to retract the bolt. The FAL's handle is on the left of the receiver, right within arms reach. There's something else wrong with the G3. Not that you use it, but where's the carrying handle?
BALANCE: I like the balance of the FAL better when it comes to off-hand or supported target shooting. When more dynamic action is required, I prefer the more neutral feel of the G3, for somehow I'm just able to toss and turn that thing faster. It's the same thing I have with the full size and carbine M-16 versions. The cabine is just ... well, can't find another word for it.. faster.
SIGHTS: I think the rotary drum-sight on the G3 beats the sights on the FAL hands down! It's fast to adjust and is a combination of a notch for short-range and an apperture for long-range. The sight of the FAL can be adjusted, but it's just not that easy to get it right...
CLEANING: Now in this respect, the G3 is a BITCH! It get's far more dirty then the FAL and after field-stripping it isn't nearly as accessible as the FAL. I hate weapons-cleaning, but given the choice, I'll take a FAL any day!
RELIABILITY: Both are nearly indistructible and I never had a serious failure on any of them.

Here's my two cents worth. I forgot to say IMHO before every word I typed. So I hereby say that this is all my opinion and you have the God given right to disagree!

Stefan
Stefan <stefan@sniperhide.com>
Somewhere, Someplace, The Netherlands - Thursday, July 01, 1999 at 11:23:19 (ZULU)


Hello,

I'm looking for some help in choosing an AR-15, also known by some as a "mouse gun".

My current choices are among Colt, Armalite, and Bushmaster.

I'd really appreciate hearing from everyone on which of these companies is putting out a good product today. I welcome any and all information that helps me make an informed decision.

After 11 years in the Marines I'm very familiar with Colt's military issue but I've never worked with any of the civilian versions.

Thanks in advance for any and all help.

Semper Fi.
Brian M. <slapsho7@hotmail.com>
El Toro, California, USA - Thursday, July 01, 1999 at 12:27:34 (ZULU)


Jr,
The State Patrol is buying six new rifles from you guys. I talked to the Lt. in charge of the teams on tuesday at the range. We were in the same recruit class and tought a lot of classes togeather. Where have you been?? Janet working you like a dog?? I should be around, give me a call I'll have one on ice for you(HA) The "KID" spanked me in the Nebraska shoot but only by 7 points. We had a good time except for a couple of brain farts(HA) Talked to Jeff Hoffman from Black Hills ammo at the shoot and he told me they were going to start loading 6.5x284 ammo for Norma and it will push a 140 at 3000 to 3100 fps!! I think that will be a barrel burner at that velocity don't you??
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Thursday, July 01, 1999 at 12:54:39 (ZULU)
The M1A1 has been overrated for years. Put the same optics and work into a SAR48 or Match FN FAL and you will have a better weapon. There is an emotional element that drives much of the gun industry -- to the delight of the gun industry. Citizens tend to think that if the military or the police have it, it must be the best. Wrong. In the case of the military, it comes down to the lowest bidder that can meet the minimum specifications. In LE, you have administrators and often training personnel that know more than the recruits, but are often way behind the power curve in evaluation and analysis.

The M1A1 has served well, not because of the weapon -- there are better ones out there -- because of the extraordinary skill of the men tasked to use them.

Big Gunn: Guys carried their sniper ammo differently. I carried mine in a little case that looked like the boxes used to carry detonators. Each round cased in foam -- to prevent noise, no other reason. It looked kinda sexy too whem the grunts would come around and would ask to see the ammo the scary sniper carried, I would look around as if I were going to show naked pictures of somebody's sister and let them peek at the case heads nestled in their little beds. The shit we do. We never grow up. Thank God. Life is so much more fun for us than that other half of the species.

Bruce:

The AR-10s I have had come through the course, when equipped with good optics performed, as you say, superbly out to 300 and excellent to 500. Haven't worked with enough of them at 600+ to comment and I have only test fired them at 300.

Bill R: As Stephan noted. My FN beats the hell out of the neck of my brass. I have never reloaded but am considering it (more a political decision than one of anal compulsion). Is there anything I can do to prevent the brass getting beat up? Can I reload it-- you indicated it could be reloaded but case life is shortened? By how much is case life shortened? Can or should I use a Dillon 550 or should I go to a single stage press for this type of reloading? Anybody with info, please have at it.

De Oppresso Liber

James R. Jarrett <jrjarrett@hotmail.com>
Freedom's Country, New Mexico, USA - Thursday, July 01, 1999 at 13:28:32 (ZULU)


James,
You can reload just great for the semi autos on the 550. I would use the DIllon dies though I think they size the brass down better esp for a semi auto. Probably what Bill was talking about on life of the brass is that most semi autos have larger "SAMI" chambers causing more streatch in the brass and there for shorting the life of it because of that. I may be wronge and he can fill you in on his thoughts on this. I have used the 550 for years to load all my ammo for my M1A and I have had no problems with feeding. You will want to use either Winchester or Remington primers the Federals are a little soft and I have heard of some slam fires although I have never experienced this.If your interested let me know I have some very good articles some place on loading for the M1As.
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Thursday, July 01, 1999 at 13:49:21 (ZULU)
Chris in NZ, The TRG-41 is owned by the gent here that owns the range/gun store here in Panama City. It is his personal gun. I work there one or two days a week so I get to take out some of the inventory and "play" with it. the store is also an Authorized H&K LE dealer. I can't wait for the UMP 45 and the...shoot...memory went blank...H&K's belt fed MG, AH...the G-21?...damn it, can't recall the weapons designation. However, they are coming in soon, and we'll take them to the range and shoot'em.

Don't get me wrong, I really like the TRG, ALOT. And I did dissasemble it to get a better idea of quality of construction...The muzzle brake was in the box by-the-way, I missed it. I like the way the design was executed. But I still think the stock shell is kind of rinky-tink. .338 LM ammo here is 95.00US. Ouch! At least that is the price offered to the public at the store. I got it at cost. I would like to try one in .308...They need to build one in .300 Win Mag.

I don't have a need or desire for a rifle in .338 LM. so I may not do alot of shooting with it. Hopefully Mark is going to order the TRG in .308. I'll be curious to test it too.
Cory Wilson <Ranger9@hotmail.com>
On a beach in , Florida, USA - Thursday, July 01, 1999 at 14:18:49 (ZULU)


FAL/G3/M1A/AR10: I never considered reloading brass when I made my opinion known to go with a FAL. I was thinking what rifle with my life on the line.

Ammo: For LE, I have a special vest that Blackhawk makes but is not in the Cat. It has swing pouches on the front for ammo boxes. It connects in the middle and if you need to go prone the pouches swing to the side and connect. Works well. I carry the ammo in the original boxes, inside a zip lock bag. They are put in the pouches, which I have lined with EVA Foam for protection.

Pistol, both team members carry a sniper rifle. It would depend on the mission as to handguns. In many cases I would not take one. If I felt the need I would carry in a thigh holster with a lose leg strap. When I went prone I would rotate the holster for comfort. I do not like the holster on the vest. I want the front of the vest free of anything. I have been thinking of a holster on the left side of the vest, hard to get to but out of the way.

Mike/Undude
Mike M. <DMMDNLN@AOL.COM>
Calif, USA - Thursday, July 01, 1999 at 14:32:58 (ZULU)


James;Pat is right about the brass being a little shortened by the size of the chambers. Add that to the bending causing a little more flexing to have to occur when you resize it. I am not sure how much bending is occuring but a little probably won't make much difference for 4 or 5 reloads anyway. Compared to a bolt gun where neck sizing is often the only thing you do the auto brass will surely be shorter than that but still much worth while from a cost stand point considering the price of brass these days. Another side note. I've shot HK brass pretty much without incident and then put it in other guns and shot it several times. The ridges on the case will disappear with several firings but the case head has a little indentation caused the the bolt face that doesn't go away. It tends to crimp the old primer in and make it hard to get the new one in.
I have to say I had a pretty low opinion of the M1a1 as recent as a year ago. Mainly it was too much like a M1. I did shoot one a bit since then and find it not to be nearly as bad as I thought. Here we go again. But in a close up battle where firepower is involved in the sense of getting rounds off toward the target. I'd take a AK over all these mentioned. This post would be real long if I told you all the reasons. But something tells me I may have to before it's over.
B.rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Thursday, July 01, 1999 at 15:28:12 (ZULU)
Bill R,
Your not going to get an argument out of me, but, I remember reading, years ago, an article that was done that compared assult rifles from all over the world from everything you could think of reliability ,accuracy, ease of handling, sights you name it,they covered it. The original FN came out on top. with the only real draw back being vulnerability of the rear sight. In the accuracy test it scored better at 800 yards with out a scope than the others did with scopes. They felt it was the finest battle rife made at that time. As I remember the AK did quite well also but of course it took a beating in the accuracy tests even in the shorter ranges. As I remember they broke them down into the lighter calibers and the heavier calibers for accuracy to make it a fair comparison. I thought at the time that it was a very through and about as fair as you could run that type of tests. I have never shot an FN but have always admired them from afar. They are way out of my price range!!
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Thursday, July 01, 1999 at 16:05:15 (ZULU)
MikeM: A load of Sheep ready to ship? Besides being bait for every two-bit stray dog and coyote, I can think of no good use for sheep...besides, the sheep you have sent previously won't even graze and munch weeds...they just lay around singing love songs. Trust me though, after your comment, I am really searching for a nice gun for you...yawn....

B.Rogers: Attached to Wylde's AR's? haha Only guns I have that aren't up for adoption:) As for the Rhino...it is all in the shot placement...and the tracking.

Old Dog
Bruce <Bruce@mannlawfirm.com>
USA - Thursday, July 01, 1999 at 16:35:24 (ZULU)


Brian M:

I own several Colts and one Bushmaster, and I can tell you that either one of these manufacturers make decent product.I've heard a lot of good things about Armalite and I'd really like to own an AR-10 someday.

Befor you buy one,decide what types of shooting and ammunition you will be shooting.This may affect your decision on which manufacturer you choose.

If you plan on just plinking and using the weapon for home defense, a 1/9 barrel may be more flexible than a 1/7 barrel for using 40-69 gr. bullet weights.Colt's standard HBAR model is a 1/7 type.Bushmaster and Armalite have a 1/9 as standard.This may or may not be an important consideration for you.

If price is not an issue, then go for the Colt.They have the reputation for consistently manufacturing quality product.They will also have a hihgher resale value because of this.Basically you get what you pay for.

I personally wouldn't own an Olympic Arms model though.I've never owned one but I know some who have.Their ownership experiences were not positive ones.

From time to time it's possible to get a lemmon with any manufacturer,including Colt.I'm not aware of any of the manufacturers you listed having the international ISO 9000 quality standard certification.

I shoot AR's with close to 20 people in my local Provincial Rifle Association.Every one of them have Colts except for one Canadian Forces Dimeaco made rifle.

If you go with the most proven product you will most likely reduce your chances for disappointment.
Jeff Babineau <j.babineau@ns.sympatico.ca>
Truro, N.S., Canada - Thursday, July 01, 1999 at 16:49:23 (ZULU)


Bruce, Drop me an email, how's the book review going??

Trigger50 <Dmicha4641@aol.com>
USA - Thursday, July 01, 1999 at 16:53:28 (ZULU)


Regards all,

I have a simple question concerning "eye dominance".

I am right handed and left eye dominant.

Over the years, my skill at getting the bullet to the center of the target has been ok using a variety of pistols and rifles.

I've tried firing in all the permutations I can think, alas, to no lasting benefit (eg. repeatable).

Before I resign myself to perpetual struggle, I thought I would ask if any of you have a suggestion; personal experience with being left eye dominant and right handed preferred, but I'd like to hear what anyone has to say.

And if this has been covered before at this forum, tell me when and I will go search again with both eyes open.

Thank-you for your consideration,

Duncan

Duncan C. <duncan@jps.net>
San Francisco, CA, USA - Thursday, July 01, 1999 at 17:12:44 (ZULU)


Pat / Bill:

Thanks for the info. When I get a 550 (on my list of toys) I'll be back for the loading data.

Bill's comment on the AK is dead on in CQB conditions. I do not consider th AK a
James R. Jarrett <jrjarrett@hotmail.com>
Freedom Country, New Mexico, USA - Thursday, July 01, 1999 at 18:39:06 (ZULU)


Duncan,
eye dominance

I also am left hand, right eye dominant.

If you want to shoot with your right eye place a small piece of clear Scotch tape on the left lens of your shooting glasses. Place it so as to occlude the front sight on rifle or shotgun with iron sights. Make it small enough not to obscure peripheral vision. If you want to shoot with your left eye you have to teach your body to shoot backwards. This takes about 2000-3000 rounds and will help your “normal” right handed form. Have some fun with this. G o into your local yokel gun shop and shoulder a right handed bolt action rifle to your left shoulder and work the bolt with your right hand. This drives the guys behind the counter nuts. Most of them will try to sell you a left handed action but explain your problem and they probably wont know what to do.

Michael <mikewood_@excite.com>
Houston, Texas, USA - Thursday, July 01, 1999 at 18:39:31 (ZULU)


Anyone on the Roster going to The Hiram Maxim Machine Gun Shoot & Military Expo in Dover Foxcroft, Maine on July 16-18 ?

Jeff Babineau <j.babineau@ns.sympatico.ca>
Truro, N.S., Canada - Thursday, July 01, 1999 at 18:41:50 (ZULU)


Pat / Bill:

Thanks for the info. When I get a 550 (on my list of toys) I'll be back for the loading data.

Bill's comment on the AK is dead on in CQB conditions. I do not consider th AK a "battle rifle". The M-16 which is a close battle weapon (<300 yards), the AK is similar without the accuracy but delivering a better punch and having more durability. The M14, M1 and the FN are what I classify as battle rifles (engagement out to 600m without optics, durable, balanced, etc). I hope I am not causing a storm here. I will say that the ergonomics of the M16 are superior to any weapon on the market today. It is precisely the ergonomics of the M16 and the very poor ergonomics of the AK, especially as related to the position of the safety, that I am here on this site today. My adversary is in the land of Buddah. Another reason why here on the ranch, I drag around an SKS because of the quick safety release.

Mike: When you come out here, bring that vest, sounds sensible. Your comment about the thigh holster shows experience. On the chest holster thing: Without getting more longwinded than I have been (once a professor, always a professor), Galco (perish the thought) made a chest holster that I carry because it can be quickly shiftd under the left arm or around to the back to allow for good prone position acquisition. I like my SAS holster, but it is awkward when running as it just "feels" awkward, especially if loose. I also carry the thigh holster on the left leg to keep it out of the way. Of course I can shoot left handed. You probably have to get permission to do so in the People's Republic of Caliprunia:-)

De Oppresso Liber

PS. Trouble with the server. Sorry about the incomplete doublepost.
James R. Jarrett <jrjarrett@hotmail.com>
Freedom Country, New Mexico, USA - Thursday, July 01, 1999 at 18:42:15 (ZULU)


Right-handed + left-eye-dominant: well, that's me! I decided to tackle the problem by learning to shoot lefthanded. I even bought a left-handed sniper rifle and after about 5 years (!) I've grown into it. I'm now to the point where on dynamic courses (i.e. stress-course at SMTC) I can manipulate a bolt gun faster "the wrong way around", then when I would be using my right hand. But then again, what works for me doens't have to work for you...

Reloading FAL-brass: I toss away the brass that has a really sharp dent in it (like a real fold) and the rest is reloaded untill the neck breaks. This is for my plinking rounds. Don't do much realoding for plinking though, as surplus ammo is way cheap over here right now. When shooting for accuracy, my FAL is set to grenade-mode and I cycle it manually, using match-brass. I love that feature!!!
I hate to tell you guys, but FAL's over here are DARN CHEAP! Do something about that administration of yours and I'll bring a crate of them over when I go to SMTC next year. I can get an original FN-made surplus FAL for about $600 and Steyrs and L1A1's for $500!

L8er!

Hope you are not feeling to bad now....

GUN CONTROL IS ABOUT USING BOTH HANDS!
Stefan
Stefan <stefan@sniperhide.com>
Right-handed, Left-eye dominant, is a bitch! - Thursday, July 01, 1999 at 20:17:33 (ZULU)


Duncan C. Re: eye dominance
Adapt, Overcome, Improvise!
I am also right handed, left eye dominant, but it never troubled me much, In addition, I have floaters in both eyes that bother me much more. I have been told that I should have learned to shoot lefthanded from the beginning, by so-called experts, the hell with that nonsense. The prefered method of dealing with it is to do as Michael suggests, just tape over one lens of the glass, It is supposed to cause less eye fatigue that way, but I seldom bother, I just squit a little right before the hammer drops and seem to get by. If you squint too long it Will cause both eyes to tire so be frugal about your squint time.
I consider such minor handicaps to be a blessing, not a curse. It allows one to develop other senses to compensate. For instance, there are many ways to tell if you are on target in the prone position besides using your eyes, the amount of discomfort in your sling arm, the pressure of cheek to stock, the weight of the butt against your shoulder,etc. To be able to slip into this kind of zone is the most fun of shooting. It is like knowing you will hit a hole in one in Golf before the club hits the ball!
Steve <nato@bright.net>
S.C.D.H., Ohio, USA - Thursday, July 01, 1999 at 20:56:32 (ZULU)
James, I thought I was the only one to carry a pistol on the opposite side for Sniper use. I hate running with it also, but I just have not found thew perfect place yet. Give me time and I will have it. Most times I dont carry one because of the running and crawling issues.

Old Dog, you know you trained all the sheep to say "Bruceeeeee, you my dadddddddy". I'll send the guns to you just as soon as I find a big enough hammer to straighten the bbls. I have been out all day shooting Ground Squirrels with my 300Win. Longest shot was only five hundred with the 220's. Deans Data Book is right on. Squirrels at 500 are still not looking good after a 220 goes in and out. This paragraph is not intended to offend anyone. If you dont like please tune to another one until you find something about flowers or something you do like.

Undude out
Mike M. <DMMDNLN@AOL.COM>
Calif, USA - Thursday, July 01, 1999 at 21:12:40 (ZULU)


Mike............Come in out of the heeat, Mike............Come in out of the heeat, Mike............Come in out of the heeat,.........

Poor little-itty-bitty gwoundy squirrely-wirrlys AND with a MAGNUM SNIPER RIFLE!

And to think people at the range though I was nuts hunting grasshoppers with an 1100 riot gun OO buck combo in 100 temp weather.
Ha-HA! HEE-HEE! HO-HO!

Chao!

peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
BIG CITY, BY-GAWD, USA - Thursday, July 01, 1999 at 21:24:42 (ZULU)


Cory Wilson,
Hi Mate,sound's like you have the ideal job,testing someone else's toy's,the .338LM gun's to me are a special application tool,they are not a general purpose tool like the .308.Having said that there is a place for them, Sako do make a TRG-41 .300WM gun,but seem's not to stablise heavy bullet's,they probabily need to increase the twist to around 1;10.Too my eye the stock look's similar to the McMillan A4 stock, seem to recall the stock(Sako) won an award for design in the State's a few year's back,if I find the article I will post it.
I bet you can't wait to fire the H&K UMP.

Chris
Chris <cafarr@excite.com>
NZ - Thursday, July 01, 1999 at 22:42:51 (ZULU)


Cory Trapp,
Sound's like a good project gun you are building,just my 2 cent's for what it's worth.Reguarding the barrel length I would go 26 if you have money to burn,27 if you don't,allow's you to shorten and rechamber back to 26.I would look at the new SS700 stainless steel barrel's from BlackStar,they seem to last longer than 416R SS barrel's,specially in reguard's to throat erosion is concerned.
Reguarding the silencer/suppressor,I wouldn't go the muzzle/QD mount route,would use a telescoping design that tension's the last 7-8 inche's of barrel(2-point mount,threaded muzzle and rear tapered interface),the barrel will need to be machined to match.Basicallly it will be heavy contour from the reciever then step down to a thinner contour,similar to the USNavy's McMillan M-89 with AWC suppressor.
Also consider going from the .300WM to the Dakota or RemUltraMag,just so the feeding into chamber will be smooth and problem free.
Suppressor construction,if short on readie's(money) go 304 Stainless Steel or if you can afford it go G2 Titanium,will weigh about 60% of the SS version and have increased corrosion resistance.
Also go tapered scope base.

Chris

Chris <cafarr@excite.com>
NZ - Thursday, July 01, 1999 at 23:14:07 (ZULU)


Brian,

My reasons for purchasing a Bushmaster. Good quality, they are the current military contractor and the takedown pin and the pins in the reciever are the standard size. Colt uses different size pins for polical correctness that makes some custom parts hard to come by. Buy your magazines now, their prices are climbing.

Lovin' Mausers in
Roger-90th OMMS <R.va@worldnet.att.net>
Micanopy Beach, FL, USA - Friday, July 02, 1999 at 00:11:06 (ZULU)


I must confess!!!! A bud with a suped up 10/22 (one holer) and I were shooting grasshoppers off the targets last Saturday. Please do not call PETA. I seek forgiveness!!!!
Bolt <mbolt34547@aol.com>
USA - Friday, July 02, 1999 at 01:23:14 (ZULU)
MikeM: Only Lorraine talks to me that way...:) Saw a video on late TV the other night about a swat team out there...maybe you should hammer their barrels straight while working on your own?

JJarrett: I am interested in what you have done to the FAL, barrel-wise. Let me know when you get time.

Speaking of FAL's, picked up a case of sealed FAL mags awhile back...plastic wrap says 4/63...perfect shape. A thing of beauty.

Old Dog
Bruce <Bruce@mannlawfirm.com>
USA - Friday, July 02, 1999 at 02:09:39 (ZULU)


A few questions: Who has good deals for purchasing factory match .308 ammo in quantities of around 500 rds?

Has anyone seen or bought one of the new Leupold illuminated reticle scopes, would you recommend it over the standard reticle scope?

C'mon, throw me a fricken bone here people.
Tailback <darrenjones@linkport.com>
Oregon, USA - Friday, July 02, 1999 at 03:01:47 (ZULU)


James I understand the distinction "battle rifle" and agree totally.
so many kinds of warfare today. The Reliability and power of the thing is mainly the reason for my affections. I think your hard to argue with on the safety issue also. I would like to try one of those F.A.L.s. I got into this same discussion with Col. Dick Culver about 2 years ago it's back in the Archives. He thrashed me about the AK.
And told me the most fantastic information about a Springifeld 03.
It was my good luck to exchange information with him!
The trigger and the Cyclic rate on Full auto seems to just work better for me and the low speed of the 7.62X39 keeps the copper wash down and the thing is short and easy to maintain in the field and the magazines are reliable and ... and... Oh well. There is no arguement on the accuracy it isn't as good as most M-16's. That cartridge though it just feeds so fine. Those old open sights... yum yum! Nothin wrong with the SKS either! If it was made in the U.S. it would cost $1800 and probably wouldn't shoot for sxXX!
I don't think we're far apart on those choices. We did one of hit probablity things at 500 yards on Metal Sillys with several different shooters of different experiences years ago. With a AR-15,AK,SKS, & M1 and a Mini 14 Ruger. no FALS or M1A1's though. Everyone of us hit more targets with the darn SKS's. But that's 500 yards Iorn sights on all of them. My MAK-90 7.62X39 was a MIlled receiver and it was second on my shooting anyway. The AR was 3rd and I forget the rest. I know my darn Match M1 was last by everyone but me and I attributed that to the fact that I owned the clunker.
Bruce old dog; Well at least you can spell Rhino! Hey if you can spell it you can track it I always say! I hear they will double back on you though!
Bruce M I believe you asked about the AR's. Gosh out of the box I gotta go Bushmaster for Value received. Colt's Ok but the post ban Bush flat top is my personal favorite. No combat experience with it though! The 20" Hbar model shoots the best for some reason only Bill Wylde knows probably. He says I'm just lucky but everyone of them I've had was better than the all the others put together.
Now that the learned ones have spoken on carrying Ammo. I have some 5 round strippers that I put my .308 stuff in. I don't know what they are for maybe some kind of foreign weapon but I put them in the M-16 bandeleros and move them where they are not in the way when I crawl.
The bandeleros (how do you spell that Old dog?)keep the glare down and can be thrown or moved somewhere else or folded and stored in the pack. Don't want to get them mixed up and throw someone the wrong stuff though. The .223 weighs about the same. No reason for the stripers except to hold the stuff together. It's best to put just 5 rounds in each pocket to keep the clink down and the count right.
You might try that and see what you think sometime.
Pistols on a crawl stalk are a problem I bet! If I had a drag bag behind me I think I'd have my Glock .40 in my hand in enemy territory just in case of surprises or up the left sleeve of my Field jacket.
Otherwise in a butt pack or ALICE on the trail when my rifle is out.
I dunno just thinking out loud. Us dog hunters sometimes would like to carry a pistol for coup de gra but it's always in the truck before the day is over.
B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Friday, July 02, 1999 at 03:12:02 (ZULU)
Mike (the Un-Dude)...
I agree with you on the H-S stock. While I have generally prefered the McMillen "A2", I recently got a H-S "M24" with adjustable length of pull, and I love it... (especially that wide barrel channel for straight bull barrels) enough that I've ordered a second one. Well worth the 3 buck and a quarter.

Pablito.
Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Friday, July 02, 1999 at 11:27:33 (ZULU)


Bruce H...
On the Vapor-locked hog thing, the Sierra 168 MK doesn't expand, and that's why it is approved for military use (Geneva Convention?... or maybe the Hauge?). I recall that back when the issue ammo for the .38 and .357 revolvers was lead Keith style semi wadcutters, and the State Police out West were using handloads with jacketed hollow points, and were accused of being "cruel", but that was a time before all the current litigation fever.

I would guess that the publics "understanding" of firearms, and the hatchet job the uneducated (but very "pretty") anchor women on the 6 PM news would do on an LE oficer that used "Dum-Dum" bullets, or "Deadly hollow points", on a helpless robber at the 7-11, who was "only" armed with a .38 revolver, would leave the poor LE bastard in civil court for the rest of his life... and by using Military approved rounds that are designed to "wound" instead of kill, that would be an out... in spite of the fact that the bullet bounced around the 7-11 for ten minutes, taking out a women, a four year old child, and the new soda machine.

Old Dog... is there any case history on this issue, or on LE using handloads, or is it fear of being the first one to defend the issue??

Pablito.
Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Friday, July 02, 1999 at 13:14:25 (ZULU)


Chris in NZ, It's one of the perks of working part time at a range/gun store. If you knew what he pays me you would realize that playing with the inventory is part of the pay. I sorted 10,000 rds of brass this sunday, and sweeping all of the lead and jackets out on the range is always fun! (not). Thats good information on the TRG-41 in .300 Win Mag. If I had found out that one was to be had without that information, I might have picked one up and then been frustrated by its lack of accuracy.

I like the AK also. I like the 7.62x39 for alot of reasons. You can get better accuracy out of that rifle by handloading US componants. But you guys already know that. I have a shiPload of the Russian and East German ammo for my AK and Mini-30 and accuracy leaves alot to be desired. One nice thing about it though, you don't have to police the empty cases and you can shoot all day for pennies. Not to offend Mr. Ruger, but my Hungarian AK (SA-85) is more accurate with the same ammo than my Mini-30.
Cory Wilson <Ranger9@hotmail.com>
P.C., FL, USA - Friday, July 02, 1999 at 14:08:42 (ZULU)


ON POLLEN: I visited SMTC in june for the basic counter sniper course and one thing that bugged me during the stalks was the pollen from the tall grass. I have a mild hay-fever and took medication to prevent me from sneezing. NO PROBLEM THERE! I, along with all the other students, had problems with these things getting in my throat and causing me to cough. It was rather funny, hearing all those dampened coughs around me, but it was bad tactics of course. Do you know of anything you can take before or during the stalk to prevent this? Oh, drinking water didn't help. Tried it when the coughing started....nearly drowned!

FN-FAL vs. AK-47: I'll go into the weekend, thinking of how this discussion ever wandered from a piece of art (FN-FAL) to a tool (AK).

Something for those of you who are going to Kosovo: BEWARE OF BOOBYTRAPPED AK-47 MAGAZINES. These appeared during the Bosnia conflict and are quite likely to be found in Kosovo. The device is a regular AK magzine with a few live rounds in it. Below the follower is a shortened spring that sits on an explosive device. The fuse is activated on relief of pressure, i.e. when the rounds are stripped from the magazine, either by shooting OR unloading. This type of boobytrap is issued with a safety-pin that sits in a hole somewhere halfway down the mag. Once the pin is pulled, the boobytrap CAN NOT BE DISARMED! The pin can't be placed back and any relief of pressure will cause the charge to detonate. There's nothing on the outside of the magazine that will indicate it's a boobytrap, other then that small hole for the safety-pin. I have a drawing of this device at home that I can scan and e-mail to those of you who are interested. I'll include the complete translated text in the e-mail. Just send me a message.
Stefan <stefan@sniperhide.com>
WHoever compares an FN-FAL with an AK is nuts, but that's just my opnion...., what do you think? - Friday, July 02, 1999 at 15:21:43 (ZULU)


Has anyone used MILITEC-1 as a lube/metal treatment?????
Ken Powell <powellke@ncsc.navy.mil>
USA - Friday, July 02, 1999 at 15:55:23 (ZULU)
Stefan,

Wrap a scarf around your nose and mouth. The cloth will act as a filter and makes you look like a desperado.
During Vietnam U.S. Special Forces would remove some of the powder from AK-47 cartridges and replace it with high explosive but they had to stop because to many GIs were blowing themselves up. Same effect as the device you describe but with a lot less work.
Just remember the first rule of traps and mines “if you don’t half to touch it then don’t”

Happy independence day !
Michael <mikewood_@excite.com>
Houston, Texas, USA - Friday, July 02, 1999 at 16:07:25 (ZULU)


Old Dog:

I have done nothing to the FN except abuse it. Hell, I don't even really understand the gas system adjustment as I have no manual and subscribe to the notion that if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Besides, if it is any tool other than horseshoeing tools that I touch, they hide the women, kids and small animals.

De Oppresso Liber
James R. Jarrett <jrjarrett@hotmail.com>
Freedom Country, New Mexico, USA - Friday, July 02, 1999 at 16:36:44 (ZULU)


Leupold illuminated reticle. Saw it at the SHOT show. Pretty cool. Battery powered though. Illuminated only the center 1 mil of the reticle.
gooch <pte00791@mail.wvnet.edu>
USA - Friday, July 02, 1999 at 18:25:50 (ZULU)
Pablito: On the question of LE's using handloads, I know of no authority [cases] saying it can't be used...there may well be, but that subject just isn't on my radar screen. It has been my experience that many departments are advised either by a lawyer hired as a, yes, police advisor, or by some member of the city attorney's office, county attorney, or on directive of the state attorney general. Some good people, no doubt, but by and large folks that wouldn't know the difference between a handload and a garden hoe. Plus, many times they seek the easy answer, as opposed to the right answer...which may well involve hardwork [read, less golf]. Much of the modern day litigation scare coming from such offices is a result of the lemming effect...one goes off the cliff...the rest follow, without knowing or caring why. If one green attorney says "oh, but we will get sued if we do that", it gets passed around the office as gospel, and within 48 hours it is as if Jesus himself gave the directive. My question has always been, so what? Why fear the courtroom so much? If some perp's estate sues because you took him out with a blue bullet, as opposed to with a green bullet, stop whining and get in there and win the case. Win a couple and that will be the end of that.

The only relevant question, in my opinion, is: Should the officer have shot the guy? If so, game over. Once justified, the bullet used becomes irrelevant and there should be no fear in trying those cases. Now you see why I am not in politics? haha

Old [unelectable] Dog

Bruce <Bruce@mannlawfirm.com>
USA - Friday, July 02, 1999 at 18:26:50 (ZULU)


Match ammo. Storm Mountain has Black Hills 175gr @385.00 case plus shipping costs. Guess what? Its IN STOCK!!!

That is all...

Gooch
gooch <pte00791@mail.wvnet.edu>
USA - Friday, July 02, 1999 at 18:31:09 (ZULU)


Big Gunn asked how ammo and sidearms were carried. When I was in STA (91-94) the Marine Corps didn't give us anything special. We actually did carry one box of 20 rounds in a pocket. We carried 60 to 80 more in the boxes in an M16 pouch which had the dividers cut out. Since the original boxes are cardboard, they were kept in ziplock bags for water proofing. Hopefully things are better now.

We carried 80-100 rounds standard for the M40A1. Looking back, that seems excessive,especially after James Jarett posted that he carried 20. I guess we were all hoping to pin down an entire company or something.

As for a pistol, I carried my beretta in the regular holster, but I bought the rigid hip extender. I attached it directly to my trouser belt. At first, it flopped a little, but then I put the tie-down strap through the part of the holster back where the metal attachment part is, rather than leaving it sliding through the nylon loop. That better secured the strap, stopped it from sliding, and raised the strap, which gave the added bonus of being able to use my right cargo pocket again. I could drop my h-harness (LBE) and still have 20 rounds and pistol on me.

Both James Jarrett and Mike the Undude mentioned they carry their pistols on their left. You don't come out and say it, but it looks like you both normally shoot right handed. I can't figure out why you switch sides. What advantages have you found in carrying your pistols on your off-hand side? Please don't think of that question as criticism, just trying to learn why you do that.

One last note on holsters- I'm a street cop now, and carry my pistol in a level 3 holster right on my belt line. I don't think a drop belt holster would be a good idea for street use.

Semper Fi,
Mark J

Mark J <MarkJ12pct@aol.com>
Columbus, Ohio, USA - Friday, July 02, 1999 at 19:44:13 (ZULU)


Old Dog (Bruce):

I think the problem with handloads and LE isn't on the good shots but on the bad ones.

Example:
You're an LE sniper, have sights on a bad guy with a hostage, and are given the go ahead to take a shot when clear.

If the shot is unsuccessful, either a flyer that hits a bystander or misses enough that the bad guy can kill the hostage, or if the round hangs in the barrel and your weapon's down, then everything hits the fan. If it comes down to it, and you were using factory ammo, then you're not liable. If you were using handloads that you had made, then they may try to pin you, the reloader, as the scapegoat.

Keyword: LIABILITY.

You're right, though; if the shot is successful, it wouldn't matter at all.

L8R

Oh, PS:
Have a happy 4th, everyone!

Leslie Bright <lbright@utk.edu>
Home of the Volunteers, Tennessee, USA - Friday, July 02, 1999 at 20:31:13 (ZULU)


ON THE SPEED OF SOUND: From the Machinery's Handbook, through air: 1087 FPS (729 MPH) "at sea level"; through water, 4,700 FPS; through brick, 11,900 FPS; through steel, 16,400 FPS. I assume the air figure as at something like 65F and a certain relative humidity. Recalling old episodes of "Sea Hunt" (I was just a kid, I ain't that ancient), when they would tap out distress signals on their tanks, I'd say the 4,700 figure sounds about right, hee hee.

Speaking of the speed of sound through water, and rifles, and, uh... rifles underwater, I am planning a little diabolical experiment in which I will fire an old Enfield in the irrigation pond to see for myself if/how bad she blows. Will report back when the results are in if I still have all my fingers. If my report is poorly typed you can figure I'm keypunching with my nose.

Notice: I am not and never have been "Da Man", nor have I ever played him on TV. I am not associated with him in anyway, and any resemblance between me and Da Man is purely coincidental. And I did not, let me make this very clear, I DID NOT HAVE SEX WITH DA MAN. Or should I say "Dat" Man in this case? Ah, well.

Light fuse, get away.
Ned <michigun@hotmail.com>
3R, MI, USA - Friday, July 02, 1999 at 20:51:28 (ZULU)


Old Dog'; is it bad law practice to hope the opposition will sink into such foolishness as handloads and give you the opportunity to make him look like he is grasping for straws and has no real defense.
I guess you would have to size up the mentality of the jury to know how to proceed? I've wondered about that for many years.
Stephan; Being nuts as I am, I did not mean to compare 1000 yard accuracy for a "Battle Rifle" to the AK-47 in long distance accuracy role. Perhaps you would like the term "Assault Rifle" to describe the AK-47. UZI and would that apply to the M-16. G-3 where would you separate the two. I hate that term but you force me into the corner.
Dead is dead or did I miss something! I'm not sure we want to go there.
B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Friday, July 02, 1999 at 21:09:15 (ZULU)
Mark, yes I am right handed. I carry my pistol on the left thigh when I have a sniper rifle as a primary weapon. It is a secondary weapon and I dont carry it at all sometimes. The reason is when I go prone I dont want to lay on the pistol. Try that for a few hours and you will know what I am talking about. As to street use I carry a SS3 or what we used to call a Rodgers for the old timers out there.

We do not use handloads because if something goes wrong the departments would rather have Federal defend their loading techniques than the agencies ours. There is also the issue of tring to make a more lethal round. Cops shoot to stop the threat not kill. It just so happens that when a round traverses the brain everything stops on a permanant basis.

The Undude/Mike
Mike M. <DMMDNLN@AOL.COM>
Calif, USA - Friday, July 02, 1999 at 21:46:53 (ZULU)


Leslie: The view you state is indeed the view of LE advisors. Here is why I don't really agree. If you take a shot and plug a hostage, or blow a kid off a Schwinn 4 blocks down, liability is, and should be, a given. Won't matter if it is the load you are using, the wasp on your arm, the sweat in your eyes, or the too many ale from last evening. There are certain jobs where you don't get a mulligan. Shooting people is one of those jobs. In my opinion, based on the many good cops I know, they understand this and, that is why they put the time in week after week...it boils down to 1 chance.

Now, do I think cops should be allowed to load their own in their garage, and use whatever they bring? Nope. Too much room for error. Are there people on a professional level that reload, and beat the consistency and accuracy of factory loads? Yes. Several local forces use such a guy and his prices are higher than factory stuff. Anyway, enough on that.

BRogers: We country boys think alike:) Use of the red herring is an art. I believe every coyote can be trapped...some are easy, some are not. They all have a weakness though. Find it, you get the prize:)

Old Dog
Bruce <Bruce@mannlawfirm.com>
USA - Friday, July 02, 1999 at 22:17:02 (ZULU)


B.Rogers: I didn't mean to offend you, I was just venting my LOVE for the FN-FAL. If it were legal, I think I'd marry mine!!! At least we wouldn't fight that often... Duh! I lost you, BTW, on the last words. M-16 an assault-rifle? YES! UZI? ..... Misconfigured jackhammer! Anything firing from an open bolt that not a MACHINE-GUN is trash in my eyes. Don't get me wrong, I can shoot fairly well at 25 meters with an UZI, but having fondled the MP5 family, that UZI is just pathetic.

Okay, now it's my turn: Happy 4th, you American goofballs! Have a good one! (Now why didn't you wish me a happy liberation-day on may 5th? Better luck next year...)

Good night America, wherever you are...

Stefan

GUNCONTROL IS ABOUT USING BOTH HANDS!
Stefan <stefan@sniperhide.com>
Sorry,, B.Rogers, if I made you feel uncomfortable. I'll have Darell send you one of his horny sheep! - Friday, July 02, 1999 at 22:57:48 (ZULU)


Re: FN rifles

To those who are interested in FNs, here is a great website to visit.

http://www.geocities.com/Area51/1234/

Good reading,
Ron N.
Ron N. <rcn8@accnorwalk.com>
USA - Saturday, July 03, 1999 at 00:46:03 (ZULU)


Stephan; Not offended; old dog would call it pleading guilty! Claiming sanity is not something I want to be caught doing! I like that "misconfigured Jack Hammer" description!
I should tell you a story bout a UZI and a MP5 but I'll pass for now.
Don't prove nothin anyway but It was interesting. When does the lady arrive? Thats a long way to ship a sexy sheep Stephan!

B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Saturday, July 03, 1999 at 01:23:02 (ZULU)


Hello again ! havent been here in a while, good to see all of you are still here.
anyways, I was wondering if anyone has any info on a caliber called 7x64. The rifle is a brno (can“t see the model number)but its a pretty straight shooter, so I was wondering if some you know about it.
the brass is marked in russian so I dont even know who makes the ammo for it!And its apparently not sold here in Iceland.
Anything is useful to me right now.
e-mail me or post it here please.

straight shooting :)
Haraldur Gśstafsson <garou@simnet.is>
Egilsstašir, Iceland - Saturday, July 03, 1999 at 01:35:25 (ZULU)


Stefan ,
If you come across any Aussie made L1A1's they are probabily some of the best made FAL's around,providing they are not been thrashed,they used higher grade steel in all part's and did not leave the Lithgow factory unless they would put 5 rds into 2 inches or less(50mm).
The Brit's used lower grade steel as a cost saving in the trigger group(lower receiver) and a lot of those Brit L1A1's have developed crack's etc, steer clear.The L1A1 has a much better magazine hookup,stronger,just buy a L1A1 mag and a FAL mag and compare the two, you don't have no work for NASA to figure out the better one.
The Aussie L1A1's were some of the most accurate FAL type rifle's made,they used the 5R barrel in there construction.
In NZ we have lot's of L1A1's, ex-NZArmy,in the hand's of Licenced Firearm User's(civies)also some with the HV-Barrel(L2A1),so most NZ shooter's are very familar with this weapon,they are very cheap here.
Any were between $250-$500USD($500 for a brand new one),but in reguard's the H&K G-3 series they are very rare and expensive,so few have experience with it,the chopper hunter's used to like the G-3's.
During the 70's and the late 80's,the vension industry used shooter's shooting semi-auto rifle's out of chopper's to cull deer for meat export,the top pilot's would fly before sun up to dusk,ususlly around 16hrs a day during summer,the top shooter's would shoot up to 1000 deer a day.The gunship's would just shoot the deer,seperate chopper's handled the recovery of the animal's,the favoured gun's being Mini-14's and M-16 type's to start with.Due to animal's not being killed with just 1 shot(223) ,most moved on to the FN-FAL,H&K G-3 and the Sig-AMT,when shooter's went to the larger calibre most animal's required only 1 shot insteed of multiple shot's.Of the 308 weapon's the G-3 was the favourite of the shooter's.The top pilot's of the era had between 30,000-60,000 hours low level flying experience each,and usually had worn out and crashed from 3-9 aircraft each.As the meat recovery side of the industry dried up in the mid 80's the operator's switched to live recovery,they invented net gun's,some mounted on the chopper's and some hand held.Some did not bother with the net's,the pilot would get close enough for the man on the skid to jump onto the deer and bind it's leg's for extraction to a holding pen.The pilot's that are still alive(alot died,some pilot rated,some mechanical)are the best in the world.Foreign pilot's that came over to NZ to be hired as pilot's in the deer industry,usually couldn't bring themselve's to flying at tussock top altitude required so the jumper's could get with in range.They usually left with white knackles,muttering about the Kiwi's being crazy.If any one's interested look up books on the subject,they make some very interesting reading.

Shit I got carried away,SORRY.
P.S. Tussock is around a 1-1/2 feet high!
Chris
Chris <cafarr@excite.com>
NZ - Saturday, July 03, 1999 at 03:04:46 (ZULU)


Tring to find an old friend. Ex Army Sgt. Robert Beasley. Enlistment in 70's. 1972 Pacific Pistol Champion. Team Armorer. Long Distance Shooter. In California in the 1980's. I have his 1942 Remington 720A award rifle Sec of the Navy Presentation. I'd like to return it . Reply <johnzlockman@yahoo.com>......
John David <johnzlockman@yahoo.com>
Prescott, AZ, USA - Saturday, July 03, 1999 at 03:53:41 (ZULU)
Chris,
Skids in the tussocks!!!! And people think that Navy pilots are crazy for landing on a carrier. I always knew that rotorheads were nuts. I'll take a carrier any day.
Doc <docs@fidnet.com>
The hot & sticky Ozark boonies, MO, USA - Saturday, July 03, 1999 at 04:20:25 (ZULU)
Doc; Do you think Chris has seen the bear? OR not? Those guys would be hell on Coyotes.
B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Saturday, July 03, 1999 at 05:49:28 (ZULU)
Lads,
Sorry about the long post,and the incorrect spelling of "knuckle's",
just ordered a Sako Silencer/Suppressor and a bipod,from that nice shop in Finland (riistamaa.fi)the silencer was $111USD and the bipod $148USD.Will post more after I take delivery,have some Lapua subsonic's (200gr) that I am dieing to try out and some Lapua HPS(170gr)@ 2820fps.
Any Canadian's out there,NZArmy is about to take delivery of some 8-wheeled LAV's from Canada , turretless,provided the Canadian's don't need them for KFOR.What are they like?

Chris
Chris <cafarr@excite.com>
NZ - Saturday, July 03, 1999 at 07:54:38 (ZULU)


Chris,

You mentioned a suppressor in your posting. I think you're talking about for a .308 gun when you say the Lapua Subsonic load.

Something that might help you. Lapua uses a 200 grain bullet with a rebated boat tail and some pre-engraved bands on the jacket to reduce bore drag in the barrel.

1st, if you reload, use a 200 grain FLAT BASE bullet with no bands. The flat base bullets have ALWAYS been better for pure accuracy than boat tails. The vast majority of winning benchrest bullets are flatbase, but they are shooting at only 100 or 200 yards. The flatbase bullet clears the muzzle crown more cleanly than the boattails do, with a much less chance of low velocity induced yaw out of the barrel.

2nd, the bands around the bullet on the Lapua create higher drag in flight. The airflow around the bullet is disrupted by these bands and the airflow over the boat tail is also disrupted. The effective ballistic co-efficient is lower when that happens. The maximum effective range for that load is around 300 meters because of the extreme trajectory of the sub-sonic load.

I have a sub-sonic load that uses a 200 gr. flatbase for shooting out of the M-24 without a can on it. Using the M-3's ballistic cam, you need to dial "3" to hit at 100 meters, "6" to hit at 200 meters, and "10" to hit at 300 meters. After that it's all over.

Contact me email and i'll give you the load data for that sub-sonic load. It's good for 1.5 MOA to 300 yards. Long flight times are also a problem for subsonic rounds and considering their intended use, long flight times are a bad thing. Leads to misses because the target easily and inadvertently steps out of the way after the trigger is pulled.
trigger50 <Dmicha4641@aol.com>
USA - Saturday, July 03, 1999 at 12:53:23 (ZULU)


Chris:

If I'm not mistaken I believe the 8 wheeled LAV's are built at the GM truck plant in Oshawa, Ontario.There was a recent automotive t.v. show segment featuring how these vehicles are built and tested.

FN FAL's:Australian and Canadian versions are arguably the best built rifles of this type.One very interesting,though little known,version is the trainor model .22LR .A few friends of mine used them while in the Army Cadet program many years ago.

Let's not forget the lessons that the Brits learned during Desert Storm.Eventhough it was considered old,out dated, and far too heavy,the FN FAL ended up replacing the state of the art Enfield bullpup (or,was that bullshit) rifle currently in service because of problems operating in a desert environment.

Jeff Babineau <j.babineau@ns.sympatico.ca>
Truro, N.S., Canada - Saturday, July 03, 1999 at 15:34:18 (ZULU)


Having read ALL of the SC archive but still couldn't find any answer..
Two questions? what's the meaning of life. Oh no..sorry.. try again.
In your opinion/experiences, what is the best flash hider (if there is such a thing) .30 cal? prongs type (eg. Steyr AUG), bird cage (eg. M14), or muzzle brake with side openings (eg. AK74)? and
What is the bullet weight of the standard 7.62x51 Nato FMJ round? I need to order match bullets to make some "mexican match" cartridge.
Thanks,
Seryl sipping a cold lime tea, outside Lucy Tiger Den, in the back wood of Thailand.

serri <'serri_ls_lithy@yahoo.com'>
BKK, Thailand - Saturday, July 03, 1999 at 15:57:48 (ZULU)


Khun Serri,

Sa Was Di Krupp. Sabai Di Mai? Dont' know if you can understand the phoneic attempt at the greeting. Spent many months in your fine country with 1st SFGA. The best flash hiders for a bolt gun .308 are full suppressors. Some wouldn't agree that they are necessary and that they change some things in the trajectory. Some cans do and others don't. The advantages gained in using a full suppressor far outweigh the disadvantages (only one i can think of is weight) OPSINC makes an excellent suppressor that is about 2.3 lbs.

The 3 prong type for the M-24 is trash, comes loose too easily and that thing getting loose disturbs the gas around the exiting bullet and causes some serious grouping problems. Good powder and loads are the best way to avoid flash at night. They are many ways to tune out the flash and have effective ammunition. Barrel length contributes to overcoming this also.

The standard bullet weight of the 7.62 Nato round is 147 grains. You can use the 155 Palma Sierra bullet as a mexican match alternative. Works pretty good and makes a damn decent 800 yard load. By any chance do you know Colonel Bunchu, ex commander of the Thai Rangers? I worked with your national rifle team for the AARM matches in 1995 when they took the AARM match.

Know the Tiger Den well, but personally i preferred Soi Cowboy. Take care, Dean
Trigger50 <Dmicha4641@aol.com>
USA - Saturday, July 03, 1999 at 17:43:57 (ZULU)


Guys, I have been in contact with some people that are interested in sponsoring a 50 caliber sniper rifle course. Guns and ammo may be provided. Cost would be included in the tuition. Heavy rifle marksmanship and extreme range shooting would be involved in the course as well as a copy of the data book that I market and the 70 page instruction book. A course book would be included that is approsimately 300 pages on 50 caliber sniping. If your interested, post it here or email me at Dmicha4641@aol.com Ranges would be out to 1600 yards.

Dean, thanks and take care.
Trigger50 <Dmicha4641@aol.com>
USA - Saturday, July 03, 1999 at 17:52:39 (ZULU)


To All,

Have a safe and enjoyable fourth of July and remember that Independance was won at a cost!

Chao!

peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
BIG CITY, bY-gAWD, USA - Saturday, July 03, 1999 at 17:53:52 (ZULU)


Serri...
The weight of the standard Nato round is 147... you can use the Sierra 150 MatchKing to make up your "Mexican Match"... it is plug and play, and will do fine!
If you use the 155 Palma, check the primers on the first few rounds... the Palma has a longer body section.

Pablito
Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Saturday, July 03, 1999 at 18:48:57 (ZULU)



I DO NOT KNOW IF THIS IS THE PLACE TO ASK A QUESTION.
BUT HERE GOES ANYWAY.
I HAVE A 30 M1 CARBINE, MADE BY UNIVERSAL, HAVE
HAD IT FOR ABOUT 35 YRS. IT CAME DRILLED, AND TAPPED
FOR A WEAVER SIDE MOUNT. BUT IT DOES NOT MOUNT THE
SCOPE OVER THE CENTER OF THE BORE, AND I AM TRYING
TO FIGURE OUT HOW I COULD DO THIS, AS I HAVE METAL
WORKING MACHINES. I HAVE CHECKED ON THE B-SQUARE
MOUNT, BUT IT FITS IN THE DOVETAIL ON THE REAR SITE.
THE WEAVER MOUNT, WITH SCOPE, LEAVES THE REAR SITE
IN PLACE, EXCEPT FOR THE FACT THAT IT IS NOT ON
CENTER. I HAVE TALKED TO SOME PEOPLE ABOUT THIS, AND
THEY SEEM TO THINK THE REASON THIS WAS DONE, WAS
BECAUSE OF THE EJECTION, THAT IT COULD INTERFERE
IF IT WAS MOUNTED OVER THE CENTER OF THE BORE. I
WOULD LIKE TO HEAR FROM ANYONE WHO COULD GIVE ME
SOME INFORMATION ON THIS PROBLEM, AND HOW I COULD
SOLVE IT. THANKS FOR ANY INFORMATION
WILLIAM L. BROWN
110 WEST LANE
WRIGHT CITY, MO. 63390
wlbrown@mocty.com
william l. brown <wlbrown@mocty.com>
wright city,, missouri, USA - Saturday, July 03, 1999 at 20:33:25 (ZULU)
Chris, be advised that the Lapua subsonic .308 load SUCKS BIG TIME! Anything less that a 1 in 8" twist produces very bad yaw as the bullet exits the muzzle. I have fired groups (if you can call them that) of 3 FEET at 100 yards. At least two US suppressor mfg's state the warranty covering baffle strike in factory threaded bbls is VOID if using Lapua subsonics.

For a great .308 subsonic factory load, contact Black Hills or Engle Ballistic Research. I just did a demo with the Engle 200 grain load using a factory Remington PSS fitted with a Gemtech can that printed 5 shot groups under 3/4" at 100 yards.

BTW, thanks for the bbl advise on the .300WM project, anyone have BlackStar contact info handy?

WIth the two-point mount suppressor, how has accuraccy been with the suppressor off? I'm concerned about the machining of the bbl and the stress relief on the bore. With the can providing tension, I know the rifle will actually shoot better, but what of length and weight or other operational considerations suggest removal of the can?

I'm trying to test out an OPS, Inc. system, but if anyone out there can provide some insight, thanks in advance.

Cory Trapp <Cory_Trapp@email.msn.com>
Aliso Viejo, CA, USA - Saturday, July 03, 1999 at 21:02:59 (ZULU)


FIRING A RIFLE UNDERWATER......what happens? I finally know!

Today I finally got around to doing this test. Had an old British Enfield in .303. It was given to me as a basket case by a gunsmith friend who was taken from us too early. He had tentatively planned on making a DeLisle Carbine out of it (.45 ACP, suppressed, used for sneaky stuff in WWII). He never got to finish it-- the way he went, and given where he'd been, I wonder sometimes if Agent Orange had a hand in it. Anyway.... I took it out to the irrigation pond behind the house. String, electrician's tape, and silicone goop were part of my kit. At the request of a Sniper Country reader, the first 4 rounds were fired with the bore sealed with tape at the muzzle and a bead of silicone at the base of the cartridge. I loaded the rifle and sunk it over a paper grocery bag to make sure that the muzzle was not in the muck. Touched 'er off with a string......PHOomph......reel 'er in.... no damage. Three more rounds this way, no damage. I then fired 4 more making sure the barrel was filled with water by submerging it with the bolt open and loading it underwater. PHOomph X 4, no apparent harm to the rifle, but I did get a few pierced primers. Those that didn't pierce showed slight, but not alarming, pressure signs. OK, says I, I am NOT taking you home in one piece. The last four rounds, same process, but I made sure the muzzle was well-jammed into the muck. Long story short, the rifle is drying on the back porch at this moment, ready for a hose-out with WD40 and apparently ready to go on with it's career. Now, I did not go so far as to check headspace before and after, but it sure seems fine. One interesting phenomenon was that the rounds fired with the muzzle in the muck resulted in empty cases coming out completely filled with muck. Hm. Would sure like to try this with a semi-auto. Anybody got a rusted, bent-barreled, shot-out SKS to donate? I'd be real interested to see if the thing will work with the gas system filled with water (it does in stupid Mel Gibson movies).
Ned <michigun@hotmail.com>
3R, MI, USA - Saturday, July 03, 1999 at 21:35:43 (ZULU)


Weekend of shooting fun shot to hell. Woke up Friday morning with the flu, second time this year! This is some butt-kicking stuff and I hope you don't get it.
Just now have the strength to get out of bed. Walked down the driveway to get the mail. 95 degrees outside, almost passed out.
Bolt <mbolt34547@aol.com>
USA - Saturday, July 03, 1999 at 22:09:07 (ZULU)

I have a question concerning where you could set a .270 to be within 3 inches at 100, 200, 300 and 350 yards(maybe within 6 at 350). I think this is called point blank range but I'm not sure. I just want to be within 3 to 3 1/2 inches at all these ranges by holding right on the target. If anyone knows what im talking about and has any information please email me. If you know its not possible, please email me.
TonyD
USA - Sunday, July 04, 1999 at 00:10:52 (ZULU)
Re: FIRING A RIFLE UNDERWATER......what happens? I finally know!
Ned,

I remember some years ago (1970s ?)that Soldier of Fortune or SWAT magazine did some underwater testing with the 1911 Colt. No harm was done to the handgun. The testing had something to do with underwater personal protection for SEALS.

As far as I know, your test is the first of its kind. Nice to see some original work.
Ron N.
Ron N. <rcn8@accnorwalk.com>
USA - Sunday, July 04, 1999 at 00:59:35 (ZULU)


I am the guy who asked the question about the load for 155gr A-MAX for the .308 . Somebody from E- town KY. E-mailed me but a member of my familly accidently erased it from my files. PLEASE SEND AGIAN.C
C. Warner <cwarner741@aol.com>
Bowling Green, KY, USA - Sunday, July 04, 1999 at 03:37:24 (ZULU)
Bolt.
Hope you get to feeling better. Don't get dehydrated.Fruit juices are good as is a solution called pedialyte ( a balanced electrolyte solution).
recon
Ron <recon@midusa.net>
Ks, USA - Sunday, July 04, 1999 at 04:13:22 (ZULU)
Sawasdee Krub Khun Trigger five oh.

Sabai De mak Krub!
Wow, your Thai is very impressive. A farang (foriegner) speaks like that around here could into a shot gun marriage quicker than an eye wink!
Sorry but the mentioned name didn't ring a bell. Barely knew any of the RTA team armory. I'm long retired before the RTA hosted the first AARM match in 1992. Col. Supin is in charge of the armoury. It is still the annual event to this day though. Before that I was just a lowly paid staff sergent clerk (S3) at the SFC in Lopburi with the fire power of a Remington typewriter. Ops...sorry, not meant to brag.
Has nothing to work on but a bunch of M80 with an old beat up Sako A1 to match up against RTA Sig-3000 with Scenar. Not a pretty sight but this ain't for a beauty contest.
want to chat long and some more but got to go. The librarian is watching if I might accidently stumble into those dirty net. I guess I overdid those accidents for today.

Serri, out in the sunny side of Lucy's Tiger Den, Thailand.

Serri <Serri_ls_lithy@yahoo.com>
BKK, Thailand - Sunday, July 04, 1999 at 10:46:37 (ZULU)


Trigger50:
You know I need an excuse to run by the wife to get a .50 cal.
I think your course just might fit the bill.. :)
I understand you are still preparing for it, have you set a date
and cost yet? Where will it be located?

Ned ( of the great pondwater specwar experimentation project )
hehe you are using a L O N G string? Keep postin the new results please.

Bolt.
It's simple: just get well dammit.
No, really, do drink lots of fluids (beer doesn't count) and max out on your vitimans and minerals! hope you get to feeling better soon!

All,
Have a happy 4th. Think of what the day is ment to celebrate.
It was the sacrifice of people like you and me that made this country
as free as it is today. Think about it. No real organized army won this country. Average folks did, with above average desire.
Screw Thanksgiving day, Appriciate what you have TODAY.

on a side note, I appriciate all you active duty persons doing what you are for me and our country. If you have any specific questions about any benefits you may be able to receive after you become a Veteran, please feel free to contact me.

buk off the soapbox.
buk <bukowski@bellsouth.net>
WetSweatinDamnHotIn, Louisiana, USA - Sunday, July 04, 1999 at 12:15:43 (ZULU)


Good nights sleep, feeling a whole lot better. May try to shoot tomorrow morning while cool. Think it's time to find another job, not working a a hopsital. Must be 10 different viruses floating around and i've been renovating the Emergency Room. Never seen so many respiratory and stomach viruses until this year. Must be them terrerests!
Any comments on Lake City 173 grain? Found on EBAY auction.
Bolt <mbolt34547@aol.com>
USA - Sunday, July 04, 1999 at 13:02:36 (ZULU)
ON POLLEN:

OOOPSS! Botched the first post - will try again.

Get some locally made honey. Make this honey part of your regular diet. We use honey on toast just about every morning. You will develop immunity to most of the pollen based allergies. It won't happen overnight but it appears to work. I know any MD's out there will probably cringe at reading this. AND NO YOU CAN'T SUE ME IF IT DOESN'T WORK OR PRODUCES ANY WIERD SIDE EFFECTS - LIKE MAKING YOUR 100 YARD GROUPS SPREAD FARTHER APART.

ON BUGS:
get some cayenne and garlice supplements - will make you (especially when sweating) - taste really bad to all but the most desperate bugs.

BOLT:
man - if you survive working in that emergency room - you will have developed some serious immunities. On a serious note check out an herb called Echinacia Goldenseal. This is supposed to help your immune system work alot more efficiently. Of course don't forget saying your prayers, good diet and exercise.

Treat this stuff like reloading data - read up on it yourself and go from there.

NO WE'RE NOT DRUGGIES AND NOT INTO VOODOO EITHER. We do grow alot of herbs and dried flowers as a side business (no wacky weed either).

Ken :)

Ken <ImpactArea@snipercountry.com>
Nokesville, Va, USA - Sunday, July 04, 1999 at 15:28:59 (ZULU)


Tony, About your 270 data,

Yes, you are talking about point blank zero. I worked up some data for you. You didn't mention your load combination so i'm posting a few different possibilities.

Sight height is part of the equation for PBZ, so i'll assume your's is 2.0" above barrel centerline.

The diameter of the Kill Zone is important. This is the dimension in inches above and below the point of aim on your target. I used a 10" Kill Zone diameter. Meaning, when aiming at one certain point, your round will strike somewhere 5" high to 5" low of your aiming point.

For the 135 Gr. Sierra Matchking at a velocity of 3000 fps. Using a ballistic co-efficient of .450 from Sierra.

Zero the Gun at 310 Yards.
Your max range for striking a 10" KZ is 364 yards.

For the 135 Gr. Sierra Matchking at a velocity of 2900 fps.

Zero the Gun at 300 Yards.
Your max range for striking a 10" KZ is 353 yards.

For the 140 gr. Sierra Matchking at a velocity of 3000 fps. Using a ballistic co-efficient of .360 from Sierra.

Zero the gun at 303 Yards.
Your max range for striking a 10" KZ is 355 yards.

For the 140 gr. Sierra Matchking at a velocity of 2900 fps.

Zero the gun at 293 Yards.
Your max range for striking a 10" KZ is 343 yards.

There is another way of employing this technique. Using the last piece of information above. If you know that your range to your target is probably more than the max of 343 yards, simply place your point of aim at the top of the backbone of the target (for big game) If you are a military sniper, shift the point of aim to the face and you push you range out to about 500 yards using the same method.

Hope this helps you, take care.

Dean

Trigger50 <Dmicha4641@aol.com>
USA - Sunday, July 04, 1999 at 15:33:38 (ZULU)


Mr. Bolt,

About the 173 grain M118 rounds. There were years when it was pretty good and years when it sucked horribly. Send me the lot # if you can and i'll find out for you the quality of that particular lot.

Alot of guys have slammed the M118 round. I have been specifically shooting that round for 14 years now in any variation of 7.62mm shooting military sniper rifles and it solely depends on the lot. From what I have observed, this may be coincidental, but the bad lots of M118 are the only ones that get out on the open market. The good M118 stays in the military system. That's just a personal observation and may be way off base.

Alot of competition shooters that are military guys use the 118 round for practicing their position shooting and grouping. Once the capability of the round is established from the bench, they strive to obtain that same level of precision in the sling in the different positions.

That round may not be great but we were able to rely on it enough to demand 7 for 10 hits on a moving target at 3 different speeds to a range of 400 yards, on a target that is 9" wide. SOTIC guys that went through 1st groups program will remember this.

On snap engagments at 200, 300, and 400 yards, it was head shots only and in 3 seconds at all ranges. Precision usually wasn't a problem with this drill. Not a big fan of M118, but it's not all that bad. The new 118 Long Range is the shit though. Still I think Lapua 185 grain loads are superior to both. Used those all over Asia, very good stuff. In the M-24 when shooting against M118 and M852 the Lapua just smoke the two rounds in long range shooting.

Damn, long winded again, sorry guys, remember why Independance Day is what it is.

Dean
Trigger50 <Dmicha4641@aol.com>
USA - Sunday, July 04, 1999 at 15:42:46 (ZULU)


Khun Serri,

Sawasdee Krupp, Phom kidwaa phom jah pai prahted Thailand, phom mai mee phanraya. :(

Good to hear back from you. I remember Lopburi well, was involved in a couple of Cobra Golds out of there. Last one was in 94.

So the boys there are using the 300 and Scenar now? Is that the 170 gr. or 185 gr. bullets? About the shotgun wedding, don't sound like a bad idea to be honest, not much a fan of American women these days. Phuying Thai pen dii maag le suuay maag. Damn, i hope that comes across okay with all the tone stuff in your language.

take care and don't hang out at Lucy's too much.

Buk,

Currently we are market researching the subject. Location will be in Western New Mexico. Concept is to get .50 cal builders to sponsor the course with different rifles and some .338 Lapua magnum guns also. Ammo and weapons will be provided in the cost of tuition. Approximate course length is going to be 14 days, but that's not solid in the air yet.

One option for those not able to go for 14 days is to pay a lower tuition rate and attend the first week only. This is an advanced long range (out to 1600 yards) course. A shooter need NOT be a graduate of a previous course to attend, but it would help. For those who are interested, we may provide a package of reading material in the form of a book as a primer to the course.

This would help get a guy up to speed on some of the more technical and mathematical aspects of the training. Most likely candidate for the time frame is the spring. More to follow as details become available.

Take care, Dean

Trigger50 <Dmicha4641@aol.com>
USA - Sunday, July 04, 1999 at 15:58:04 (ZULU)


Speaking of a New Mexico Loaction. Just before Trigger's course, a Basic Course to about 600-800 yards is also planned for Medium Bore rifles. Five or six days of precision shooting with a few instructors you might know. We are working out the details. You have to bring your own rifle for this one, but the same instructors(3) are planning to give you the tools needed to hit at range. Positional shooting, Bagged, Bipod and every other way you might need. This is planned for the spring and details are being worked out. Anyone interrested Email me or Trigger. Yes you will shoot with a sling and I hope it is one of mine.

The Undude/Mike
MikeM. <DMMDNLN@AOL.COM>
Calif, USA - Sunday, July 04, 1999 at 16:45:19 (ZULU)


Bolt
Do you work at the hospital in the medical field or are you into maintenance and construction? Just courious as i'm a full time firefighter and emergency medical Registered nurse.

Good uck if ebay will allow the sale of the loaded ammo to be compleated. They have turned into politicaly correct turd heads where things regaurding firearms are concerned.

Thanks to all who helped with the freedom we enjoy. Your sacrifices are remembered every day. not just the fourth.
recon
Ron <recon@midusa.net>
ks, USA - Sunday, July 04, 1999 at 18:11:59 (ZULU)


hello all. I took the advice of the writers of this page and bought a savage 110FP with a 8-24x scope on it. I shoot a jagged hole at 150 yards. I bought this gun in the 25-06 caliber. I want to do some long range shooting and hunting some large game animals. Some my question is what would be the advantages of maybe buying another gun in a Win 300 mag and what is the maximum effective range of the 25-06. Any help would be very appreciated Thanks, Andrew
Andrew Buse <andrewbuse@aol.com>
shepherdsville, kentucky, USA - Sunday, July 04, 1999 at 19:13:03 (ZULU)
I received the following e-mail from a friend:

I signed up to use a web email service. Basically it would set up a web based email service using my domain name. In the end I decided not too but I received this email today -

"Michael,

We have limited the access to our service in an effort to make it attractive to the largest possible group of partner sites. Unfortunately, we've had to exclude certain types of content in order to achieve this. We currently feel that any site that promotes/contains/focuses on pornographic/racist/libelous/illegal materials/gambling/alcohol/tobacco/firearms does not meet the requirements for access to our service because too many people may find it objectionable.

We appreciate your interest in our service, and we're sorry that we can't accept your site at this time because it violates our agreement.

Sincerely,

John P. Foster
Partner Consultant
Everyone.net
25 North First Street
San Jose, CA 95113
Ph: (408) 279-5900 ext. 211
Fax: (408) 283-9077
mailto:jfoster@everyone.net http://www.everyone.net "

Firearms obejectionable? Sounds pretty dumb to me. Well feel free to send a nice email to them.

Harry Merkin <hmerkin@aol.com>
USA - Sunday, July 04, 1999 at 19:33:44 (ZULU)


Harry,

Tried to send a blistering response to what you wrote below. The website came back as non-deliverable.. No surprise there. That's the same thing the Violence Prevention Center does when they want to lay low for a while.

Dean
Trigger50 <Dmicha4641@aol.com>
USA - Sunday, July 04, 1999 at 19:46:50 (ZULU)


Thanks alot for the .270 data. It helped me alot. I am very grateful.
TonyD
USA - Sunday, July 04, 1999 at 19:53:44 (ZULU)
Howdy all,

In preparations for my tour i havent had the time to respond in the way i would have liked here on the Duty Roster.
I see i've missed a lot of good new subjects, such as the ;"To Fal or not to Fal, thats the question..." or the shooting fun about differences in speed at different altitudes, or the newer ;"What happens if i shoot my 6000$ sniperrifle underwater, besides me getting a heartache...".

Furthermore i've heard all the stories and seen all the pictures from my bud stefan about how it has been on SMTC , all i can say is, you lucky basterds!

To all; i would like it very much if some of you would write me, now and then, so i can keep myself updated on the great info i'll be missing here on the Roster, and from time to time i hope ill be able to post a message on the Roster through my dear friend Stefan (That is if its ok with you Stefan, :), forgot to ask you this ,lol).

My adress to respond to will be;
Hi, since im off to kosovo for 6 months, i wont be on the net anymore , but i would like it very much if we could stay in touch now and then by mail.
My post adress for kosovo will be ;

Plug
71.02.10.230
Sergeant
1(NL) infcie K-FOR
1(NL) GN hulpbat K-FOR
napo 58
3509 VP Utrecht
The Netherlands

To Torsten; Stefan is wright, the graves are a must-see in normandy both the german and the alied ones, along with point-du-hoc, where the rangers led the bloody way, most of the bunkers are still in one peace, sort of.It will make any soldier think of the job he has chosen.

To Chris; to bad its a nato operation, because i would have liked it very much to meet your aussie and New-Sealand troops again, like with the UN ops in bosnia.

To Stefan; stay of the booz and leave the sheep alone!!

Hope to hear/read from y'all soon and see y'all in 6 months back on the Roster.

Yours truly,

Mcnab aka Marco

Nec Temere Nec Timide

McNab <Sarge@pantserjager.demon.nl>
NL - Sunday, July 04, 1999 at 20:50:34 (ZULU)


Thanks for the tips guys!

Recon, I'm a construction engineer but I do have my EMT, BTLS and Hazmat Specialist certs. Working on getting Rescue cert. I'm also on reserve with SORT(Special Operations Response Team) under FEMA and the NDMS.

Lake City 173's were loose bullets only, the last price wias something like $23 per 100. Didn't know if the were special or not!

Mcnab, keep your head down and watch out for them sheeps!

TOMORROW......I will definitely get the 300 mag vs. 308 thing going again, if the fever didn't effect me brain too bad.

Bolt <mbolt34547@aol.com>
USA - Monday, July 05, 1999 at 01:51:32 (ZULU)


Hey Boltster...

$23 a hundred is a hell of a lot of money for 173's when you can get Sierra Matchkings for $18-20 a hundred... I've seen 173's in the Shotgun News, for $8 a hundred, which makes it worth it for practice, but if you can't get them for that price, then get new MatchKings for $18-20, they will shoot circles around the 173's

Pablito.
Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Monday, July 05, 1999 at 02:25:21 (ZULU)


God; may the torch of freedom burn forever with well armed men like these herein to guard it! Tis my pleasure to know you all on this 4th of July 1999.
b.rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Monday, July 05, 1999 at 04:10:00 (ZULU)
Plug: That new sheep of yours that you would send me so I could "take care" of it, never arrived. I fear it has raped the mail-man and is now on it's way to live with Dähähähärell in Chicago... Stay safe and keep away from Struik-blikken! I heard they are more dangerous then dud NATO bomblets.... They do make a great defence-wall though, much better then US MRE's!!!

Depity Dave: Good to hear your voice on the phone yesterday, and I'm sorry I completely forgot to congatulaty you on Independance Day. How thoughtless of me!

Torsten: Met Gert saturday on the range but he didn't have my shorts. I've been sweating my ass off yesterday! Hope to see him again soon. I gave Gert the money for Reinhart, so call off those Dobermanns! So, I take it from your post to Gooch that Reinharts rifle has been painted? What did he put on it? Smiley-faces? I introduced KIMS-games to the reserves here. Must have been as funny for Rod/Gooch/Dave as it was for me! They sang Jingle-Bells quite good though!

Bolt: McNab knows to leave the sheep in Kosovo alone. The Serbs knew he was coming and boobytrapped all their fannies! Oh, good to see yu're feeling better, I'm starting to feel worse! If you mention the word .300 WM today, I'll sedn you the worst e-mail virus I can find!

Ned: Thanks man! You finally gave me an excuse to get my scuba-gear out again. Never had the money available to buy one of those harpoon-rifles, but now it turns out I've always had a super alternative around! Any word on group size at a 100 yd. underwater target? :-)

Chris: Any FAL not made in Herstal belgium is a COPY! I'm kind of an FN-freak, so to see the way you commonwealth people have maimed the FAL kinda hurts me. Folding charging-handles, funky flash-hiders, awefull pistol-grips (at least on the British L1A1's)... I have a very old !!!FN!!!-FAL and I consider it top notch!
I had the chance to get my hands on one of those L85A1's Jeff mentioned. What a piece of crap!!!! The mag-well was to narrow to allow the use of standard NATO M-16 mags, I cut my hand on the little hatch covering the chanrging-handle-slot (never mind, the Brittish Sgt. said, they break off after a days use) and the rifle literally CAME APPART when shooting it. After a couple of hundred rounds though each of the 4 we had available they QUIT and nobody could get them going again. Oh, BTW, this was at the RANGE, not in the DESERT!!!!!

Take care y'all!

Stefan
GUN CONTROL IS ABOUT USING BOTH HANDS!!!

Stefan <stefan@sniperhide.com>
Somewhere, Someplace, The Netherlands - Monday, July 05, 1999 at 07:21:11 (ZULU)


Guys,

Unfortunately I can't afford them, but there are some good looking IOR-Valdata binocs at EBAY. Look here.

L8er!

Stefan

Stefan <stefan@sniperhide.com>
Somewhere, Someplace, The Netherlands - Monday, July 05, 1999 at 08:07:41 (ZULU)


Stefan-

Those seem to be real-deal Former East German Zeis-Jenna binocs, not IORs. I have both the 7x40 and 10x50 IORs; fundamentaly different configuration. I dont know which are superior, if any. The eBay item you linked is a very good value, though. Last I looked those went for well over $100 more than the current bid price.

-Tom
Tom Simpson <bullet45@usit.net>
Colatown, SC, USA - Monday, July 05, 1999 at 14:06:50 (ZULU)


GREETINGS all at SC, Wow check this out...Rosie O'Donnell was kind enough to host my Gun/Political commentary site on her web page for FREE!

You can see it at http://rosie.acmecity.com/merriment/131

I even linked To Sniper Country and My Favorite training place, Storm Mountain Training Center!

Check it out! you can get 20 meg of FREE space too!

Click on my name to go there now...I will be updating sooooon!

Listen to TokyoRosie sprout her anti-gun propaganda!! Rosie thinks ALL gun owners should GO TO PRISON.

Check out www.fulton-armory.com..you can get your free web space there! Help Walt bury Rosie.
Cory Wilson <Ranger9@hotmail.com>
Panama City, Fl, USA - Monday, July 05, 1999 at 14:54:40 (ZULU)


Morning shooters,

I am looking for a professional to do an independant evaluation of the tactical data books that I have developed and mentioned on this site a couple of times. Some of the guys here have bought them.

Ultimately I would ask this review to be submitted to the Review section of Sniper Country's website. Any takers? Contact me email please. Set of data books goes for free and a signed agreement is necessary to proceed. Thanks.

Here is the description once again. These tables are hand calculated specialized data tables. The tables I have are for common military calibers. .50, 338 Lapua, .300 Magnum and the .308. The tables for .308 are for M118 Special Ball, and Special Ball Long Range, and 168 gr. at 2600,2650,2700 and 2750 fps and M80 Ball (147 gr. bullet @ 2750 fps).

Individual caliber sets are available without buying the entire set. The entire set is a much better deal at 125.00, however each caliber set is 25.00. For example, a set of M118, M118 Long Range and M80 Ball 7.62mm military and .308 tables would be 50.00. The .50 caliber tables alone are 50.00 because there is much more data. If you are interested specifically in the .50 tables, they have all 5 standard military rounds "Greentip" Mark 211, MOD-0, M8 API, M33 Ball, M20 APIT, and M903 slap data.

These tables is highly refined and very accurate tables that give elevations in minutes of angle, elevation settings per 100 meters, remaining velocities, spin drift, flight times, angle of fall, danger space and wind deflection in inches, Mils, and Minutes of Angle. This data has been proven with many different .50 caliber rifles and other sniper weapons systems in many worldwide environments.

What makes these more accurate than any table generated by computer or on the market is that a different and precise ballistic co-efficient is used every 100 meters. There are based on live firings and the data corrected to standard atmospheric conditions. Therefore the times of fight that are used in the windage formulas are more accurate. Computer models use an average over a certain range. This contains many errors as velocities and data around the trans-sonic flight range will be in gross error.

These tables ARE NOT REACTIVE as are other "data books" that are on the market. They are designed so that the sniper can correct for all meteorological and environmental conditions the sniper may shoot in. Furthermore, more data can be developed as requested.

The tables are sent with a 70 page instruction book that not only teaches the use of the tactical tables but is a short course on exterior ballistics and precision zero techniques that correctly tune these tables to the gun/ammunition system for advanced sniper applications. The tables are printed on card stock (5 x 7") format.

They are inserted in a very strong and flexible vinyl page that is similar to a document protector and are bound together with 5 ea. 1" rings. The cover is a BDU camouflage heavy vinyl. These are the same as the USAF flight crew manifest checklist booklet. You can see the book insert i am using at www.pdipueblo.com go to the vinyl products section. The cost of this option is 15.00 per book set.

Trigger50 <Dmicha4641@aol.com>
USA - Monday, July 05, 1999 at 15:37:33 (ZULU)


Rifle firing underwater... I'm pleased and surprised at the amount of response to my trying to scatter this old Enfield......

Ron N-- I remember hearing about the SOF test. They also did it at one of the conventions in Vegas-- in the hotel pool-- and had a little problem with the manager I'm told. If I was there that year, I missed it.... I'd love to give that a try but am not ready to risk one of my cherished 1911's. Will keep my eye out for something expendable (...anybody..?). Saw a nice old Devel Gammon compensated .45 auto blow yesterday at a steel match. Double charge we presumed, barrel and slide totalled.

Buk-- The lanyard was not all that long but I made sure not to stand directly behind the rifle! Each time I fired it, it moved about 3 feet through the water from the recoil.

Stefan-- Scuba divin' with an Enfield, hm... leave the weight belt home. Judging by the sound at the surface, I'm thinking the report underwater, as long as it is directed away, would not be dangerous, even though the speed of sound through water is much faster.

With the interest in this, I now feel kinda obligated to go a little further (damn you all). Think I'll make a cradle that will hold the rifle aimed at a steel plate say 3' or 6' from the muzzle and shoot it submerged. See what kind of penetration I get (and group size?), and extrapolate velocity from it maybe, by comparing underwater penetration to "air" penetration at various distances until they match, then figure what the velocity at that "air" distance would be.

Don't expect this tomorrow! Comments, suggestions, questions and subjects for diabolical experiments welcome. Post and Email, please, as I'm pretty busy in the shop and can't always monitor SC as much as I'd like.....

Thanks-- Ned
Ned <michigun@hotmail.com>
3R, MI, USA - Monday, July 05, 1999 at 16:08:29 (ZULU)


MikeM & Trigger: When you get more info on the New Mexico thing, let me know. Very interested.

Having email problems here. Mine go out, none can come in...I hope to hell our computer guy isn't in charge of any Y2K programming "fixes"...well, I take that back. Then the world would have sympathy for my problems:)

Old Dog
Bruce <Bruce@mannlawfirm.com>
USA - Monday, July 05, 1999 at 16:18:28 (ZULU)


PeteR:

Send me an email...Varget rules... testing new pc w/ cable modem

Hope everyone's had a good 4th.

Rented and watched SPR again... so powerful a film. Hit just as hard as the first time a I saw it on the big screen.

Good to be alive and living in the USA
Jeff A. <d1k2l3@smyrnacable.net>
smyrna, ga, USA - Monday, July 05, 1999 at 19:14:24 (ZULU)


Recovering from flu + 6 hours shooting @ 105 degrees = shitty shooting

Going back to hunting, a good COLD weather sport. Don't know why any human would want to fight a war in heat like this. Looks like the people would get hot, call it quits and have a beer together instead!

Hot tub + Crown Royal + redhead = near drowning. Ned, be extrememly careful with pentration under water. Damn near drowned one night from it a couple of years ago. LOL LOL LOL

Too delerious to bring up 300 mag thing. You lucked out Stephan.

By the way, forgot to say &^*((^$@#%&*(^% M3 scope. Ah for the days of 1/4 clicks. Sherrie, give me another valium with that beer!

Bolt <mbolt34547@aol.com>
USA - Monday, July 05, 1999 at 21:26:12 (ZULU)


Bolt,

Get well friend,

AND STAY OUT OF THE HEAT!!

You'll end up going postal SPECIAL DELIVERY on the local grasshoppers or ground squirrels!

Stay cool folks

Chao for now!

peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
HOT-HOT CITY, BY-GAWD, USA - Monday, July 05, 1999 at 21:31:53 (ZULU)


Bolt:
Hang in there man - it's butt-ugly hot everywhere. Feels about like an armpit here in Northern Va.

Ken :)

Ken <ImpactArea@snipercountry.com>
Nokesville, Va, USA - Monday, July 05, 1999 at 21:39:03 (ZULU)


Bolt,

You lucky Bas*$#%. A redhead, hottub, daaammmmmnnnnnnnnn...... be like i'd died and went somewhere. Not sure where that's going to be yet.

Take care, don't overheat.
Trigger50 <Dmicha4641@aol.com>
USA - Monday, July 05, 1999 at 23:24:28 (ZULU)


Greetings All

Does anyone have a AICS stock fitted to a M700 PSS DM?

If so has it performed satisfactorily?

Thanks in advance.
Darryl <darryl.todd@eddept.wa.edu.au>
- Tuesday, July 06, 1999 at 02:35:40 (ZULU)


Trigger,
Maybe you can settle a little debate for us. What muzzle velocity does a .308 175 grain Sierra have to be to track with the Leupold vari-x lll using the 308-168 @ 2600 cam with the range in meters? How about if using the .308 168 grain bullet? I think the click values are
2 - 2
3 - 5
4 - 9
5 - 13
6 - 19
7 - 25
8 - 32
9 - 39
10 - 47
Also what do you think of the metric tables in the LAU book? That is another topic that no one will touch with a 10 foot pole.
Steve <nato@bright.net>
S.C.D.H., Ohio, USA - Tuesday, July 06, 1999 at 02:49:32 (ZULU)
Does anybody know where to get a STABO rig, been trying to put together web gear and hate suspenders?

Going back to off hand positions, been practicing the cross leg sitting position, as was a topic a while back, sitting for 15 minutes and shooting 10 shots at an 8 1/2 x 11 target with a 2" dot, with a sporting weight rifle it is easy to steady and hit the the target at 350 yds with consistency, but with a heavy SWS rifle it is difficult to steady the weight forward barrel. Tried shifting weight forward, backward ETC. but still find it difficult to hold steady with consistency. Any training techniques (ie breathing, pressure against a body part, timing, etc) to overcome this shortcoming?

It was mentioned about carrying a sidearm on the left side by a right hand shooter or in an SOB position, is this just as a piece of gear or do you practice any kind of quick retieval from this position. Any special type of holster?

You just have to love practicing and getting a good workout in this 100+ degree weather. Hey at 6 in the morning it's 90 degrees and that 5 mile run just makes you feel how good it is to be getting older by the day. Makes the beer worth while.

Tony Y <ayackowski@rcn.com>
Iselin, NJ, USA - Tuesday, July 06, 1999 at 04:52:34 (ZULU)


NEED SOME HELP!!!
I got into a discussion this passed weekend on the subject of load development, and their was some very good info being passed back and fourth....

The one thing that I'm not to sure about was that a long bullet (190gr-200gr-210gr-220gr-240gr .30 cal) might not be stabilize at 100 yds. even with the correct twist rate....
So if this is true then ANY load work @100yds. with any long bullet would be a waste of time........

I've heard this said many times around my shooting circle but I thought it was one of those things that, people don't know what they are talking about.......But the individual that I was talking to surely knew his stuff.....( Hey Charlie )

My mind only operates on a simple level, so it would seem to me that if a bullet exits the muzzle of your rifle in an unstabilized state or even becomes unstabile in flight some were, how can it improve with any distance..............

--------------------------------------------BigGunn---------------------------------------------------

BigGunn <meghan@penn.com>
Mtn. Country...were the mountain isn't high enought to get out of this Dam heat!!.....in..., Pa., USA - Tuesday, July 06, 1999 at 05:03:48 (ZULU)


Dose any body know where I can get my hands on some cartridge holders (the red ones) for a 300win mag that came out of federal ammo boxes......(about enought to hold 250 rnds is what I'm looking for)........
I got a bunch that fit 308 win but only a few for a 300WM...........

Any help would be apperciated.............BigGunn.......................

Dam Hot BigGunn <Meghan@penn.com>
Smoken Hot Mtn. Country in the brown state of....., Pa., USA - Tuesday, July 06, 1999 at 05:20:53 (ZULU)


"I just returned from a trophy whitetain hunt along the Milk River here in Montana. My Buck, a respectable 5X5 measured 148, fell to a single shot from my Arnold Arms .300 Win. mag. at 368 yards! As host of the Rockey Mountain Trails TV show, I probably shoot more in a year than the average shooter does in a lifetime, but let's give credit where credit is due. I am completely impressed with my Arnold Arms Apollo rifle. On opening day of my 1996 Colorado mule deer hunt, I used this rifle to make a clean one-shot kill on a monster 10X13 buck with a 34 1/2" inside spread. According to my laser range finder, the distance was 930 yards! There's more. I have a real problem with coyotes at my Montana ranch, and they always seem to be just out of range for everything but my Arnold Arms. So far, I've shot more than a dozen of them at distances out to 500 yards! Off the bench, my best group so far measured a mere 3 3/4" I have a safe full of rifles that will do this any day of the week...at 300 yards. What made this group so impressive is that I shot it at 1000 yards, and one of my shots punched out the X-ring!! I used a Bausch & Lomb Elite 4000 6X24 scope, and Speer Nitrex factory ammo with the 180 grain Grand Slam bullets. I used sand bags and a solid bench rest, and I waited at least 10 minutes between shots. Each shot was fired from a completely cold barrel. I was trained as a sniper in the Marine Corps and I get a big kick out of making those really long shots. The longest shot I have ever made, I made with this rifle. At 1650 yards I made the shot half a dozen times, making one-galon plastic milk jugs filled with water disappear with great consistancy. If I could own only one rifle, it would be my Arnold Arms in .300 Win. mag. It is the finest, most accurate rifle I've ever Owned.
Sincerely:
Larry W. Lindsey"

the above is a direct quote from the Arnold sales lit...
The 180 grandslam had a BC of .41 and in Nitrex is loaded to 2950 fps. There is a pic of the rifle, it's a sporter with at most a #5 barrel, and a wood stock. The "1000 yard target" is a standard NRA style 50 yard small bore target with something like 8-10" of black. anyone know of this guy? isn't that a 1000 yard BR record? other...comments?

gee, if their hunting rifles shoot like this, imagine what their tac rifles will do...
Jimbo <J@jimbosguns.com>
CO, USA - Tuesday, July 06, 1999 at 06:23:14 (ZULU)


Jimbo...

On "Larry W. Lindsey's" amazing feats of shooting... they are truely amazing.

The world record at 1000 yds is 3.1" with a gun that needs two people to carry, using the best bullets the benchrest world has to offer, not hunting bullets.

And on the scope he shoots with... IF (and thats a big IF...) he set up the scope with tapered bases, so that the 100 yd zero was at the bottom of the elevation dial, and he wasted no clicks of elevation... his maximum range would be about 850 yds. The B&L 6x24 is a fine scope, but has the shortest elevation range of any scope on the market... a total of 24 moa from top to bottom... he would need 35 moa with that cartridge to make 1000 yds, and 110 moa to do his water jug trick, and 110 moa is available in only two over the counter scopes... the 16x Leupold MK4-M1, and the B&L 10x Tactical.

Of course he might have pulled the trigger VERY hard...

Pablito.

Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Tuesday, July 06, 1999 at 10:16:59 (ZULU)


Right good story but he forgot to tell the the part where slick willy did'nt inhale and Monica swallowed........

God I HATE marketing hype!

Off to broil at harpers ferry with da toursists.

Chao!
peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
BIG CITY, BY-GAWD, USA - Tuesday, July 06, 1999 at 13:08:17 (ZULU)


Jeff A,
Long time no hear!! Where have you been hiding?? Have you been doing any shooting?? Remember all work and no play makes Jeff a dull boy!!

Pablito,
"He don't need no stinking mil dots or dials to hit at 1650yds because he's probably a "MASTER SNIPER".

Steve,
If you have a M3 LR try the 30-06 cam with the 175s I think you will find them to be pretty close or do like I did for my 260 mark off and paint the top half of the dial and then scribe in your own numbers it works great or just use the MOAs on the bottom if its the M3 LR.
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Tuesday, July 06, 1999 at 13:12:46 (ZULU)


I read some of the same things in the Arnold Cat. and laughed my butt off. I have heard very good things about the rifles but that had a negative impact on me. I have no doubt that some guy said that but they should have checked out the "War Story" and not insult us. I hate stories that should end with "And them I woke up"

The UnDude/Mike
MikeM. <DMMDNLN@AOL.COM>
Calif, USA - Tuesday, July 06, 1999 at 16:08:55 (ZULU)


I AM ORDERING A RUGER#1 B IN 270 WBY I WANT TO
SHOOT 130 gr. BULLETS I HAVE READ SOME GREAT
THINGS ABOUT THIS COMBO IT COMES 26" BERREL
THE #1 IS A SINGLE SHOOT THE REASON FOR THIS IS
I AM LEFT HANDED MY CHILDERN ARE NOT I BELIVE
THAT THE SPORT OF SHOOTING WILL ONLY LIVE ON
IF WE TEACH AND INCLUDE OUR KIDS
IF ANYONE HAS SOME GOOD LOADS OR GOOD TIPS
I WOULD BE THANKFUL FOR ANY AN ALL
DALE
DALE <SNIPER@WG.CHARTER-UTAH.COM>
NIBLEY, UTAH, USA - Tuesday, July 06, 1999 at 17:19:11 (ZULU)
ANY OF YOU SNIPER TYPES LIVE IN CONNECTICUT? A COUPLE OF MY SHOOTING BUDDIES AND I ARE TRYING TO LINK UP WITH SOME LIKE-MINDED SHOOTERS TO SWAP IDEAS, WAR-STORIES AND TECH TIPS. WE'RE A COLLECTION OF VETERANS, SOME ARE BONA-FIDE EX-MILITARY SNIPERS, SOME COMBAT EXPERIENCED, ALL OWN WEAPONS (SNIPER SYSTEMS AND OTHER EXOTIC STUFF). WE USUALLY PRACTICE AT A LOCAL RANGE. INTERESTED? E-MAIL ME.
Marc <Chopper124@aol.com>
Vernon, CT, USA - Tuesday, July 06, 1999 at 18:26:38 (ZULU)
Yep, its true "farther north you go...more things 'ill eat yore horses! Nuther feller done seen the bear!
B.Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Tuesday, July 06, 1999 at 20:54:14 (ZULU)
Darryl,

The AICS system works FANTASTIC!!!!! It's expensive (around $600 dealer cost for standard, $1200 dealer for collapsible--I just recieved a green colored standard stock last week....Momma was good to me for my birthday.....) The action attaches to an Aluminum bedding piece that runs from the buttstock to about 10 inches forward of the chamber. The stock is divided longitudally along the bore axis and is "sandwiched" around the metal. (sounds ugly but it is ohhhhhh so sexy.....) My PSS was a non-detachable mag type...but the stock comes with a 5 rd. detachable box mag... All I had to do was remove the guide piece and Voila!..... I picked up 2 extra mags at about 50 apiece...... Be advised this Stock is hhhhhheavy......I would not want to have to stalk with it... I dont know exact weight but it feels significantly heavier than a Mcmillan and a &*%#pot heavier than a H.S. Precision. The barrel channel is enormous!!! It also has an integral (Anschutz type) accesory rail, a Parker-Hale attachment point and a Harris attachment point. Molded in buttstock hook, four sling swivel points....yada yada yada.....I am obviously not a salty-sniper type like some of the esteemed jedi that frequent this site but all i can tell you is the first time I shot the gun with this stock I had to change my drawers...... You really ought to check one out and see for yourself. Had to sweet-talk talk my chief for permission to put it on but it was worth it......

Mike Kirn <mkirn@hotmail.com>
Zebulon, NC, USA - Tuesday, July 06, 1999 at 21:05:15 (ZULU)


All,
A friend of mine purchased a H & K 45 USP last weekend we shot over 500 rounds in one day without a single failure to function. This is a GREAT pistol. My question is do any of you know a way to fix the creepy trigger. I know he will have to live with a long double action pull and there is a competition trigger with an over travel adjustment. Does the comp. trigger also allow you to adjust the take up or can any of you recommend a gunsmith to do the work.
Thanks,

Michael <mikewood_@excite.com>
Houston, Texas, USA - Tuesday, July 06, 1999 at 21:17:38 (ZULU)


Mike.
AICS AICS
You are soooo on the money about the AICS. I just received mine with a black stock last week and boy could my REM700 Police 308 DM shoot after that and I know it was not my shooting that had not improved overnight. The stock is a bit heavy but boy is it a great stock, comfortable thumbhole and very very solid. I have some 10 round mags(backordered) and green stock sides on order and after that I am 100% ready to go. I would love to hear a review of this stock from the "veteran" shooters on this page. So far it is worth every penny to this no name civvy shooter.
Paul <pcirco@home.com>
Omaha, NE, USA - Tuesday, July 06, 1999 at 21:36:54 (ZULU)
Nice little article on Gunny this month in SOF.

In autozone last evening, see they carry 4 colors of "camo" paint. Black, tan, brown, green. $5 per.

Shot 12 shots into about 1.5 inches @ 1,475 meters today with subsonic 22lr ammo. Is that good? Would have been tighter, but got a flier mid way through. :)

Old Dog [Master of nothing worthwhile]

Bruce <Bruce@mannlawfirm.com>
USA - Tuesday, July 06, 1999 at 21:54:59 (ZULU)


Hi. Has anyone any experience with the choate sniper stocks?
I am thinking about trying one on my sendero. I see they fit the 700 ADL and BDL but do not specificaly mention the sendero. Someone told me it seems that HS was the manufacturer of the kevlar reinforced factory stock. Does anyone have info on this? Thanks.
recon
Ron <recon@midusa.net>
ks, USA - Tuesday, July 06, 1999 at 22:06:51 (ZULU)
Hi,my first time here,can anyone tell me if there are any sniper type comps in england,any thoughts on the armament technology AT1-C24,how much,accuracy,features etc.Doe;s anyone know whether you can get a cam for the M3 for 168gr fed match.Thanks
Daniel <killjoy975@aol.com>
port hope, ontario, canada - Tuesday, July 06, 1999 at 23:41:13 (ZULU)
Hello everyone,
For those of you looking for torque screw drivers Fixed or adjustable models taking various 1/4" shank bits try Utica tools of Utica New York.They are not too expensive and if torquing action screws or scope mount screws is important to you check them out.
I use these tools in my work every day.They have no comparison.
Steve
Steven Dzupin <DZUPPI@AOL.COM>
Wayne, NJ, USA - Tuesday, July 06, 1999 at 23:43:02 (ZULU)
Hello everyone,
For those of you looking for torque screw drivers Fixed or adjustable models taking various 1/4" shank bits try Utica tools of Utica New York.They are not too expensive and if torquing action screws or scope mount screws is important to you check them out.
I use these tools in my work every day.They have no comparison.
Steve
Steven Dzupin <DZUPPI@AOL.COM>
Wayne, NJ, USA - Tuesday, July 06, 1999 at 23:46:36 (Z