Sniper Country Duty Roster

July 03, 2001 - July 13, 2001



Gooch & Rick,
Thanks for the wake-up call.
It's too easy to go off on a tangent and miss the obvious.
Basic Rifle Marksmanship Skills, Position & Form, how often have we all heard that these foundational elements are the key to success?
I am sure that the reason why I have "good" days and "bad" days is that I allow myself to slide in the basics and my disciplines have gone to hell. I get sloppy and I miss and start looking for reasons....."gotta be the bipod".
From now on I'm going to do a simple checklist everytime I set up for a shot and checking natural point of aim will be near the top.
Thanks again.

out

Kevin R. Mussack (Andy's Dad) <kmussack@aol.com>
Clifton Springs, New York, USA - Tuesday, July 03, 2001 at 00:32:11 (ZULU) (your host address: 205.188.195.39)


Wes, if always the student sometimes the instructor shouldn't they call the belts Instructor/Student belts? Seriously Kydex is good stuff if made strong and not like the cheap stuff from Israel.

On a big time plus issue Dan Ross and I have emailed back and forth several times. A good possibilty exists that I will have the proper mount and floor plate on the M40A3. I am working at getting an actual USMC M40A3 test weapon so atleast when I write about it I will have shot the hell out of one not just read about the specs and gave an opinion. I have been shooting the one made to USMC Specs for awhile now and can not say anything but good.

Undude
MikeMiller <Tactical@tacticalintervention.com>
Calif, USA - Tuesday, July 03, 2001 at 01:08:57 (ZULU) (your host address: 64.12.102.34)


Hi everyone,

One question. Does anyone know where I can get a M700 clip slotted per USMC specs?

Semper Fi

Steve
 

Steve Field <Fang33937@cs.com>
Albemarle, NC, USA - Tuesday, July 03, 2001 at 01:33:38 (ZULU) (your host address: 152.163.206.184)


Lady and Gents

A couple of things before I hit the rack.

Went to camp Butner this weekend to shoot the 1000 yd match. Before I get to the report of that I will address a couple of other things. I saw a couple examples of George Gardner's work there. Two words: polished and professional. Secondly, I met a couple of "confessed lurkers" there too. Nice guys. I hope you guys will come to more of these shoots. Ok to the Match report.

Chapter 1 The Savage/Tasco SS Rig goes to the 1000

What,you say?! Thats right Savage, Tasco and 1000 yards!!
Rifle - Savage 10FP .308
Scope - Tasco SS10x42
Load - Fed brass, CCI std primer, 44.3gr Varget, Sierra 175MK, seated to 2.815

Here are my scores with 200 being the max score per match. 20 shots per match, 10 points per shot.

Match 1 185-2
Match 2 183-2
Match 3 180-2

These were all shot on Saturday. I only had 70 rounds therefore I could not shoot Sunday. Only 70 rounds because of a couple of things. I had never shot past 600 yards and I had never shot this load. So, get on the line put 35 minutes of elevation on my 200 yard zero, cranked on 1.5 minutes of left wind ( I know you are supposed to hold for wind, I'm a rookie)pulled the trigger. Result, an 8 at 5 o'clock. I'm in the black and happy. I put on another 1/2 minute of elevation and I was there for the rest of the day. Only wind to contend with (which kicked my a**). Wind varied from approximately 2.5 minutes left to 1 minute right. Not too much I guess, but tough on a rookie.

To cut this off, I am happy with the results. This load worked great. The Savage shot great and the rounds were not "keyholing at the other end which was a surprise.
Now if we could get enough people to show interest in the HS Precision stock for the Savage, things would be perfect.

One last note, a couple of guys from Ft. Bragg were there, Huskins and Crawford (Rick, you know these guys?), what a treat to watch those guys keep them in the X-ring.

Semper Fi

Paul

Paul <paulcockerham@att.net>
Reston, VA, USA - Tuesday, July 03, 2001 at 02:04:35 (ZULU) (your host address: 12.91.132.179)


Steve,

Semper Fi dog!!!!

Send you rifle back to GA. George can do it.

Good night all

Paul <paulcockerham@att.net>
VA, USA - Tuesday, July 03, 2001 at 02:12:14 (ZULU) (your host address: 12.91.132.179)


Paul,

I've e-mailed George but haven't gotten a reply yet. Off this week for Independence Day?

The rifle I want clip slotted is the Old M40 in the wood stock with the green scope I showed you at the Match. That's all it needs to be correct.

Thst old stick shot pretty good, I was impressed.

Semper Fi

Steve
Steve Field <Fang33937@cs.com>
Albemarle, NC, USA - Tuesday, July 03, 2001 at 03:18:14 (ZULU) (your host address: 152.163.204.198)


Paul - Ed Huskins is one of our instructors and is a VERY good shot. He will keep them in the x ring all day and holds the new Georgia record for 1000 yd. Crawford is his side kick and they shoot all over the place. They are both hard to beat with Ed taking some and Norm taking the others. As far as holding, when in a match dial in the wind, when tactical and you must get the shot off hold for the wind. Our range will drive you nuts trying to get a shot off at a set time and dialing n the wind. About when you have it dialed it will change just to be ornery. :-)

Hold Hard guys.

Rick
 
 

Rick <rbowcher@aol.com>
Fayetteville, NC, USA - Tuesday, July 03, 2001 at 03:37:43 (ZULU) (your host address: 152.163.207.54)


Every now and again someone from the Roster will write me and thank me for my service to OUR country, especially around Memorial Day, Pearl Harbor Day, and Independence Day. I just want to say to you all that it is an honor and a privilege to serve you, my brother Americans, and the United States of America. I think I speak for all people who have been or are in the military when I say that I am thankful for your appreciation. It's good to know that you're wanted.

Here is a patriotic quote given to me by one of my old professors whose father was killed in action on Iwo Jima. It reads:

"War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature, and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself."

Don't take this to mean that you have to have been, or be, in the military to be a good American. Just love this country and do what YOU can for it. That's all. And celebrate the Fourth of July. You're an American, it's Your Birthday too.

Semper Fi

2Lt. Stephen B. Field USMC
Steve Field <Fang33937@cs.com>
Albemarle, NC, USA - Tuesday, July 03, 2001 at 03:48:32 (ZULU) (your host address: 152.163.204.198)


Thanks to the guys who brought up and answered the bipod hop.I was always istructed to get at " an angle" behind the rifle, now once again Ive learnt something here that Ive never heard elsewhere.On the long range savage thing I shot my 223 with bsa & 62 gr projectiles @ 600m last weekend. Far from a winning score but I wasnt last either.
out
G.W
Gavan Willis <gwillis@simplex.net.au>
damn cold, in occupied , oz - Tuesday, July 03, 2001 at 05:53:09 (ZULU) (your host address: 203.87.27.163)
Ok Gentlemen ~ and I use that term VERY LOOSELY:

-Any one know who services KOWA scopes. I have a TSN-1 that I don't think is quite up to spec. Could be the eyepiece that needs tweaked. Also, I have heard that someone does a complete waterproof job on them. Any help here?

-Is anyone still putting mil-dots into a spotting scope since Premier seems to have discontinued the loopy?

-mid range shooting question: I request opinions/ feedback of this recent experience....Rick? Gooch? anyone?
I recently shot a 600yd prone any-any (read psuedo F=Class) match with my "sort of" M40A1. Score was 191-3x, definitely got caught by wind let offs a couple times - not paying close enough attention. After the match I realized I shot it with Loopy set a 3.5x. Some were saying that I should have shot better 'cuz I shouldn't have seen any wobble, and others were amazed that I did that well. Me, I'm in between on my feelings here. I was using "left over" ammo from an M1a that had never been shot past 300yds out of that rifle, and barely gave moa groups at 300yds from it. FWIW I'm master class NRA hipower in service rifle.
 

Steve - hockyref <s_uhall@riflemen.net>
South West , PA, USA - Tuesday, July 03, 2001 at 12:54:53 (ZULU) (your host address: 63.107.135.116)


I believe Stephan's quote is from John Stuart Mill (1806-1873), penned sometime during the US civil war...
Jim Mitchell <medicjim86@hotmail.com>
NJ, USA - Tuesday, July 03, 2001 at 13:31:43 (ZULU) (your host address: 12.20.190.1)
BIPODS ON HARD SURFACES: **This opinion, in it's final form has been determined to be worth 2 cents in U.S. currency.**

I cannot prove that I am getting a POI shift off of concrete, but I've got that nagging doubt everytime I am forced to set up on a chunk. What I have been doing is taking my Eagle padded scope cover and sitting the bipod legs in it. This gives me two layers of nylon and closed cell foam between the bipod feet and the concrete. I always have the PSC with me until the rifle is deployed so it isn't a problem slipping it into position. Even with this improvement, the rifle will still track poorly during recoil. Absolutely got to be on the gun properly every time (just like you guys say).

Besides any multiple target scenario that necessitates getting back on line quickly, don't forget that single target engagements are just as important on your follow through. Even when engaging a single target, you are out of touch with the situation until you have your field of view (sight picture) back on line with the intended target. Even with a spotter feeding you info, a lot of things can happen in just 2 or 3 seconds.

Bottom line is that I am a puss when it comes to Mr.Murphy. I try to get a few shots logged into my book off of concrete under different conditions and also practice other bipod problems. When in certain environments it would be STUPID to set your bipod feet on a narrow or slippery surface just so you can use the damned thing. It's a tool! JUST CAUSE YOU GOT IT DON'T MEAN YOU GOTTA TO USE IT! Be sure to log in some shots from your ruck sack or other improvised rests. Your rifle will track differently off of these things but when set up properly will have no loss of accuracy.

A freakin bipod leg slipping off an edge when things are in a high pucker factor guarantees a FUBAR.

I'm dumb and paranoid, so when I get a rare moment to actually shoot my rifle, I try to keep it difficult on myself. I don't want to do something for the first time when the shot has to count, even at a match. Everybody just remember that it's OK to shoot a poor group or miss a target in front of your buddies during practice as long a you're learning something and improving your capabilities.

Little things mater at a distance. Don't let tomorrow be the first time you're forced to deal with them in less than perfect (bipod feet on freshly mowed lawn) conditions.

See. I told ya. 2 cents.

Everybody stay safe,
TC
 

Terry Cross <kmw308@aol.com>
Forest Hill, LA, USA - Tuesday, July 03, 2001 at 13:47:39 (ZULU) (your host address: 152.163.201.48)


Sorry everyone, forgot to tell you who said that. Jim is right, it was John Stuart Mill during Civil War.

Semper Fi

Steve
Steve Field <Fang33937@cs.com>
Albemarle, NC, USA - Tuesday, July 03, 2001 at 14:12:36 (ZULU) (your host address: 152.163.197.186)


FOOD FOR THOUGHT:

Happy 4th of July!

When the Declaration of Independence was declared, John Adams wrote this historic letter to his wife:

"I am apt to believe that this day will be celebrated by succeeding generations as the great anniversary festival. It ought to be commemorated as the day of deliverance, by solemn acts of devotion to God Almighty. It ought to be solemnized with pomp and parade, with shows, games, sports, guns, bells, bonfires, and illuminations, from one end of this continent to the other, from this time forward forevermore."

(But for this, I would NOT have thought about touching a beer, but if John Adams says we should...)

Also, note that John said the celebration should include GUNS. So much for the arguments that the founding fathers never meant the 2nd Amendment was for everyone.

Happy 4th Everyone (Now I have to mail this to my British Boss!)
 

Jefe
 

Jefe <diabloazul01@hotmail.com>
- Tuesday, July 03, 2001 at 17:46:59 (ZULU) (your host address: 200.30.103.130)


Hawgs,

Have any of you found steel trigger gaurds and foorplates for the M70 stealths? The tigger guard is made of cast pot metal and seems very fragile. I cringe each time I torque the action screws. Looking to upgrade, but can't find anyone that makes steel replacements. Any help is greatly appreciated.

Chris
"FatBoy"
Chris <hepkat0013@aol.com>
Mid-Tenn, USA - Tuesday, July 03, 2001 at 18:30:04 (ZULU) (your host address: 205.188.192.184)


Ok, guys....this shooting with a scope may not be as bad as it looks. Of course, it helps when the equipment cooperates. Dos, the Howa finally started coming on line. I had to push the bullets waaay out because of the long throat, but it seems to be paying off. It's putting the rounds less than 1.5" off point of aim out to three hundred, which is all the range I had today. Now, had I not been using those evil moly-coated bullets, I'm sure it would have been ever so more accurate. And the Tasco 6x24 is not the best in the world, but it is ok for that. I set it at 10x and let 'er rip. Also, it helps if the action retaining screws are torqued in correctly. So much to remember, it's getting to be like NM highpower! But, it's amazing how the sun comes out, and the birds begin to sing when the rifle hits what you aim at. Since it's only an 18" bbl, and all I will ever use it for is peckerwoods out to 300', that's fine by me. If and when I decide to step into the world of real long-range shooting with scoped rifles, I'll need a longer bbl, and does anyone yet have any experience with the .300 WSM over 600 yds?
Charles S. :Hunt <dpms223@aol.com>
San Antonio, Texas, USA - Tuesday, July 03, 2001 at 18:34:17 (ZULU) (your host address: 205.188.195.56)
Dam, more sniper questions that I can remark upon!

Steve – On the 3.5, don’t see where it would make much of a difference myself. You already ignore wobble, so shooting high mag is not a problem and you shoot irons so not seeing the target with perfect clarity is not a problem. You shoot high master with irons. Your brain went into shoot mode and you shot. Sometimes you will shoot REAL good and then sometimes you will merely shot good. You happened to only shoot good that day. :-)

Terry – Agree with you on shooting data, but would not shoot off of concrete with bipods unless unavoidable. Carry the small bench rest stand made by, great name has slipped my brain housing group, but the stand is not attached to the rifle and it rest on the concrete and weapon rests on a the pad. Weapon no hop and stay on target. Also, excellent point you made on recovery to your target. Misses do happen just like s**t, and you need to be back on target sa fast as possible. Always assume a miss, or you will have HSBOSs heading your way. Of course that is better then SSBOHs.

Jefe – They have effectively removed “illuminations, and bonfires” as well as “pomp” and any form of loud behavior. What makes you think the left leaners are going to not go for the whole ball of wax?

Oh well enough for now, will end this and do other fun things.

Hold Hard Guys.

Rick

Rick <rbowcher@aol.com>
Fayetteville, NC, USA - Tuesday, July 03, 2001 at 19:19:34 (ZULU) (your host address: 152.163.201.52)


Terry..
I guess I really haven't noticed much POI shift with my rifles when shooting from bipods or over a rest. I always get more from the outside factors such as weather than anything else. Some days I can be off a full MOA for what ever reason and it drives me crazy. Just my opinion though and I could be way off too!!!
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Tuesday, July 03, 2001 at 19:24:40 (ZULU) (your host address: 207.41.18.3)
RICK:

As many things as I dislike about my home state of Vermont, its the only State I know of whose Supreme Court ruled that requiring a concealed carry permit is unconstitutional because it violates the 2nd Amendment. They havent taken it all yet!

And besides, I remember when the power went out at Fort Bragg, at least in divisions area that there were enuf fireworks to make Mr. Adams very proud! All American, All the Way!!

Meanwhile, life in South America is pretty damn good! The Brits in the company all do their tour and go home till the next one. All the Americans stay here and live while the Colombians try to flee the country. It sure helps with rental prices!

Gotta luv a country where the murder rate goes down 15% when they change closing time at the bars from 2am to 1am!(although it kind of pisses you off at closing time).

Sorry for the off topic post, but I am having entirely too much fun!
 

Jefe

PS: You need some Sello Rojo or something, just drop me a note and
I will get to it when I can.
Jefe <diabloazul01@hotmail.com>
- Tuesday, July 03, 2001 at 21:28:20 (ZULU) (your host address: 200.30.103.130)


I have my '1a set up for a bipod to be mounted under the gas system. The first time I tried it w/ a bipod was with a Harris and it was a NASTY-assed group. Laid it over a sandbag and it shot a nice little group. Now I use a Versa-Pod and it holds a group almost as nice as over the bag. BUT, I can use either a Harris OR a Versa-Pod on my m700 towed and it shoots the same itty-bitty groups all day.
This is on hard-packed dirt BTW. The 'pod has the metal feet.
I put a sandbag under the feet of the bipod when shooting off the concrete benches. Or if the RSO will let me I shoot off the ground.
Just my dos pennies worth.
Spud,
Out
Dennis <usmcspud@mindspring.com>
Merced, Kalisocialistfornia, USA - Wednesday, July 04, 2001 at 02:37:09 (ZULU) (your host address: 165.247.226.36)
Rick,
I know what you mean on the god/bad/great days. Having shot iron sights for so long...using optics seems kina strange. I'm just getting used to it. For lack of a better way to describe it, it was almost like shooting offhand in that I "knew how big the wobble was" but couldn't quite fully disengage the brain and hardwire the eyeball to the trigger finger. Easy with irons 'cuz I just don't see no wobble at 600. I either call it perfect, good, aw shit that was out, or WTF did I miss a wind shift.... Probably just getting myself wrapped around the axel here 'cuz the load I was shooting was "expedient", not good. I needed some ammo and I had that stuff left over that I was burning up. It shot pretty well out of my old M1a, but I wasn't really pleased with it out of the bolt gun.

Thanks for the input.
steve - hockyref <s_uhall@riflemen.net>
South West, PA, USA - Wednesday, July 04, 2001 at 03:49:23 (ZULU) (your host address: 151.201.137.27)


M1A and Bipods:

At the last local gun show I attended I was looking over the wares at one of the tables when another individual asked the guy behind the table if he had one of the VersaPod adapters for the M1A. It replaces the plug and allows you to attach the bipod to the gas system.

The conversation ran along the lines of any bipod attached to the gas system of an M1A, including the original military bipod, will cause the mating spline on the barrel at the gas system to wear out faster and affect accuracy. The point was if you wanted to mount a bipod to a M1A, mount it to the stock.

What is anyone elses thoughts on the matter?
 

Byron <byburnham@earthlink.net>
CA, USA - Wednesday, July 04, 2001 at 04:29:26 (ZULU) (your host address: 24.41.40.76)


Help, I am looking for a leather lace on cheek rest for my Remington 700 Sendero. I am trying to find one similar to what the M1 type rifles used, without the offset. The problem I am having is getting a good cheek weld on my rifle. The scope is a Leupold Vari X III, Long range target 6.5x20x50. I had to use high rings, and now am not satisfied with cheek placement. Thought one of the lace on pads would give me another 1/2 inch and solve the problem. Any insight would be greatly appreciated.
Kerry Jorgensen <bikrprchr@nwinfo.net>
USA - Wednesday, July 04, 2001 at 07:17:15 (ZULU) (your host address: 216.187.158.194)
Ref: Sniper Computer

Have any of you Hogs seen the "Shoot-Rite" palm computer for snipers? I visited thier web site and it looks interesting. I imagine it would really come in handy for those .50BMG shots past 1,500 yards.

I'm very conservative about equipment changes. Anything that takes batteries and can be an emitter is suspect in my book. However I must also be ready to embrace innovation when it is for the better.

So??? What's the skinny on this thing?

Undude....looks like a good subject for your next opus.

out
Kevin R. Mussack (Andy's Dad) <kmussack@aol.com>
Clifton Springs, New York, USA - Wednesday, July 04, 2001 at 10:49:24 (ZULU) (your host address: 152.163.205.68)


Kerry - Try either an Eagle or Blackhawk cheek rest/pack. They come in a lot of different ways and alot of the guys use them. Fulton Armory also has one that has removable pads for setting the height.

Happy July 4th to all.
Lets not forget the significance of today, because if we do there may not be too many more to celebrate.
 

Take care
Titan <hatherly1@home.com>
USA - Wednesday, July 04, 2001 at 12:07:38 (ZULU) (your host address: 24.4.252.150)



HAPPY July 4th!! (and Independence Day for those to which it applies).
 
 

EMC(SS/DSV) Larry J. Porter, USN, Ret. <skporter@nts-online.net>
Boonies of the Panhandle, Texas, USA - Wednesday, July 04, 2001 at 13:46:14 (ZULU) (your host address: 216.167.138.15)


Kevin Mussack: Sun shades, ran accross a site lens-shade.com. Has stiff rubber lens shades that sort of stretch over the objective lens. For ten bucks may be worth a try to replace ARD.

Bad work/any smith. You have 2 basic paths here. If business was done over state lines, may be able to go on mail fraud. Postal inspectors take this stuff very seriously. The thought of federal legal problems should get people to sit up & take notice.

The other method is local court system. If you & they are local look at small claims court. You will have to get "expert" tesitmony/documentation that the work is bad/part ruined. Remington service center should be able to give you a letter stating that. If out of state send paperwork to better business bureau and/or local district attorney see about state charges. A written evaluation by Remington or someone would also help out with postal inspectors.

There's 2 major ways to identify good smiths: quality or work and how they correct problems. Try as you will, every once in a while something goes out the door that shouldn't. A good buddy had an original Armand Swensen 1911 that got out the door with a 1 7/8 lb trigger. I went nuts trying to figure out how that trigger could be that light without the hammer following. Went to the point of calling the man and his reply amounted to "Oh S@#t, send it back NOW!"

All else fails there's always Gun Parts Inc. for a new bolt.
WR Moore <wrmoore2001@yahoo.com>
VA, USA - Wednesday, July 04, 2001 at 14:20:52 (ZULU) (your host address: 63.21.148.253)


Happy 4th guys!

Byron - You mess with the gas system of that weapon and it will shoot two things - Jack and s**t. That lash up will change vibration and POI radically and unpredictably. That is why there is grease under(or supposed to be) the forestock matting collar and the gas collar. This minimizes the rub and the vibration changes as the rub changes.

Now begging the all important question - Why do you change out a perfectly good extractor made by Remington to a SAKO. The Remington extractors we originally had did not start to wear until over 50,000 rounds were put on the bolts. That is not a misprint guys. We also can change an extrctor on the range with a jewlers screw driver and our thumb when they finally do wear out. I just don't see you guys putting on the 8000 rounds a your guns we do on our student guns. Just my 2 cents on this chartge to change the "bad Remy extractor". Makes me wonder if this is not another myth set up by gunsmiths to make more money?

Jefe - That is one thing that I really like about Vermont. Jeffords is one of tose things that I really dislike. :-) (Sorry could not resist!)

Steve - As you know and stated, there are those days when you just do not know what the heck happened. Relax, go into shooter's meditation and then shoot that X. :-)

Hold Hard guys and again, Celebrate safely but celebrate!!!!

Rick

Rick <rbowcher@aol.com>
Fayetteville, NC, USA - Wednesday, July 04, 2001 at 15:19:11 (ZULU) (your host address: 205.188.197.37)


Byron,

Hey how's it going? I saw your post about the bipod for the M1A gas plug. Any bipod attached to the gas system will cause accuracy problems. If you want to put a bipod on the M1A attach it to the stock. A swivel bipod is way better because it helps to keep the pressure at the barrel band, and stock ferrule consistant. The Versa Pod works real good. It swivels in two different directions. It pans so you can follow a mover(some), and swivels so you don't "cant" the rifle if it is on an uneven surface. It has a quick release feature that allows you to remove the pod from the mounting stud. It is a copy of the Parker Hale bipod.
I have two M1A's and over the last several years I have tried different configurations with them. Currently they both have Kreiger barrels, and McMillan stocks. One is setup like the early version M25 with a Mk4 scope, and BPT mount. It is very accurate, but at about 17Lbs it is just a bit too heavy. I enjoy shooting the M1A, but for the same bucks you can buy a real good custom bolt gun from Nor Cal, or some of the other good rifle builders. The bolt gun is gonna require less maintenance, and will be more consistant over the long run. And it won't weigh 17 Lbs!
Hope this helps you decide what you want to do.

Best Regards, and Have a Great Fourth of July!!
 

Bill B <dc8plumber@aol.com>
Outback, Ky, USA - Wednesday, July 04, 2001 at 15:28:14 (ZULU) (your host address: 64.12.104.34)


RICK:

None taken. In fact, that ruling and the fact its got some great countryside are the only good things about the state left.

Shouldve known that any place that spawned a soldier like Steve Bnascni would go to hell in a handbasket!

Take Care,

Jefe
jefe <diabloazul01@hotmail.com>
- Wednesday, July 04, 2001 at 16:13:55 (ZULU) (your host address: 200.30.103.130)


Hello all youse hawgs and hawgettes. Quick check in. Found a 1000m range event happening up in Sparta. Will be ready for the next one. First IDPA match coming this Saturday. Way stoked for both events. Ken I am still trying to figure out Front Page!!! :>)

HAVE AN AWESOME AND SAFE JULY 4TH!!! HAPPY INDEPENDENCE DAY!!!
Geoff M <kill@internetwis.com>
God's Country, USA - Wednesday, July 04, 2001 at 16:59:24 (ZULU) (your host address: 209.207.51.186)


HAPPY 4TH TO ALL!!!
Coronas are on Ice, Filet is ready, fireworks are standing by and I am going to watch Mel give Cornwallis Hell! To heck with historical accuracy man, this is a celebration!
Just received my M1A from George last week and haven't gotten to shoot it yet but man what a rifle! Even my local gunsmith had to admire it.
My hat's off to all- past,present and future who put it on the line day in and day out to make this country free and safe for the rest of us. You have my thanks and my support. A prayer for those who are gone. Take care all.
Bill Moore <lmalterna@aol.com>
Goodview, Va, USA - Wednesday, July 04, 2001 at 17:54:02 (ZULU) (your host address: 64.12.105.174)
Rick,

Changed my Rem extractor for a Sako unit after blowing a primer and causing the extractor to become unreliable. The Sako unit thus far seems reliable, and field repair would not be a major production.

When changing I would have preffered an M16 type unit as used by Savage, for a cleaner installation ,but lost the address of the folks that do that conversion.

Also should be noted That I have a Rem700 from the mid 60's that has had the original barrel replaced after the rifling began to look like an HK, still has the original extractor in it, and I know I got that 8000 round mark beat all to hell on this rifle.

Best to all, be safe on this 4th.
Mike in Texas <mcdonald@hcn.hcnews.com>
Granbury, Texas, - Wednesday, July 04, 2001 at 18:06:15 (ZULU) (your host address: 208.232.237.81)


Rick-ster...

I just couldn't stay quiet on this one... Remington extractors.

My first Rem 40-XB/R 308 was bought NEW in 1966... took it to the Carlos match in '99 (and shot you twice HA ;) and it got a new extractor for it, in '96.
I have a bunch more of Rems that are real long in the tooth (circa late 60's), and they are fine.

The old design is called the rivet or staked extractor, and you could wear one out if you shoot a LOT! (about 20,000+ rounds).

About 20 years ago, Rem re-designed the extractor, and the new one is called the snap-in extractor (very easy to change!! What Rick said... do it your self!)... and you would have to belt feed one for a year to wear it out.

The new design also has a bigger tooth, for more rim grab.

At the same time, they redesigned the replacement staked extractors to have the new style tooth, so once you replace an one style extractor... you will never have to do it again.

I built a M24 clone in 308 last year, and am about to finish another one in 300WM in a few weeks... each one has about $3000 in parts, but not a dime spent on the extractor.

If you are changing the extractor on a M700 bolt, you are just throwing money away... you will NEVER WEAR OUT A CURRENT Rem EXTRACTOR OUT!!!
... and they do not fail.
 
 

"X" <condor@mags.net>
USA - Wednesday, July 04, 2001 at 18:18:46 (ZULU) (your host address: 208.249.180.80)


A Happy Independence Day to you all - but especially to those in the U. S. armed forces. We owe our ability to celebrate this day to the service and sacrifice of you and your brothers in uniform.

God Bless America!

Obl. sniper-related topic: I have set myself up for a shot at next year's "most-improved shooter" award at the FCSA championship match. If there is such a thing. I did poorly, due to a number of factors, but I did finish, and I learned a lot.

Mike
BMG Mike <bmgman@swbell.net>
USA - Wednesday, July 04, 2001 at 18:20:33 (ZULU) (your host address: 64.123.15.245)


Range Update:

Two hours and two gallons of sweat later we now have the target area cleared and mowed with the bank behind the steel mowed "high & tight". We like to account for every round fired with a clang or a splash of dirt. Now we'll be able to see what's happening and adjust our settings.

It's starting to shape up nicely. The farmer was cultivating his cabbage so no shooting this morning. Maybe later this afternoon.

I got two yards of red flag nylon at the fabric store yesterday and will create a range flag to fly when the range is hot. (expensive stuff)

Gooch & Rick,
I did a safety fan for the range even before I asked permission. We've got a full 2,000 meters of vacant rising gound behind the 12 foot high bank against which our targets are set. The next property down range is the County Landfill. We're good to go. It'll be a while before we start shooing night fire under parachute-flares. ;-)

out
 

Kevin R. Mussack (Andy's Dad) <kmussack@aol.com>
Clifton Springs, New York, USA - Wednesday, July 04, 2001 at 20:25:51 (ZULU) (your host address: 205.188.198.181)


Joe,

Glad to see your post, now get your ass back in here.

Got to say this, the Rem snap in extractor may never 'wear out ', but they do fail. Mine did and it only takes one to make the point. Failed right in the middle of a two day class to boot. Embarassing.

Mike in Texas <mcdonald@hcn.hcnews.com>
Granbury, Texas, USA - Wednesday, July 04, 2001 at 21:09:03 (ZULU) (your host address: 205.188.198.13)


Chase & Jim,

I am going to respectfully ask you to resolve this rifle dilemna somewhere other than the Duty Roster. The related posts will be removed and filed elsewhere.

If there is a problem act as adults and resolve it following correct adult behavior and, or, customer service practices.

If this cannot be done, the S/C Council can deal with it other ways

Do I make myself ABSO-F&*#KINGLUTELY CLEAR?

Oh and by the way
 
 
 

HAPPY 4TH OF JULY TO THE USA, AND All OF ITS CITIZENS!
 

Chao!
peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
Big City, By-Gawd, USA - Wednesday, July 04, 2001 at 21:16:53 (ZULU) (your host address: 205.188.197.24)


Guys,

First of all, happy 4th from across the big pond. Now if you all would start congratulating me with the 5th of may that would be cool. Oh.... I forget ..... it was you who liberated us, so I guess I should thank you on that day.... ;-)

Question: can anyone give me a good explanation (or point me to one available online) why BOTH uphill AND downhill shooting require the same compensation? It's OK to tell preople that it is so, but it's something else (not to say: it sucks) if some smart*ss starts asking you WHY. (If you're reading this, sorry Dimitri).

Thanks for any help you can give.

Stefan
Stefan <sniperhide@run.to>
Someplace, Somewhere, The Netherlands - Wednesday, July 04, 2001 at 21:24:29 (ZULU) (your host address: 213.46.159.37)


Stefan,
The reason why you want to hold low shooting uphill or downhill, is because the trajectory of the bullet is only effected by how far it has to go. When talking about shooting from elevated postiions, two factors, (Besides gravity and drag) come into play. They are Slope distance and Horizontal Distance. Slope distance is the line of sight distance from weapon to target.( This is the distance that you will measure the range on). The second factor is HORIZONTAL distance. This is nothing more than a straightline distance from gun to target. Imagine your position as being on the top apex of a right angle target, with your target at the bottom right of the base leg. The distace from your position to the target(Slope Distance) will be greater than the distance from the left edge of the base leg to the target location(Horizontal Distance). Gravity and Drag only effect the bullets trajectory along the horizontal distance line, not the slope distance, and that is the reason. Whew...Long winded reply..IF you want further information on this(Like how to figure horizontal distance) drop me a line, off the board and I will send you some information. Now..Back to lurking, and watching for incoming.
Bobby Whittington <whittington@snipernet.net>
Grandfield, Ok, USA - Wednesday, July 04, 2001 at 22:57:34 (ZULU) (your host address: 208.254.123.115)
Kevin (Andy's Dad) - Glad to hear you have the safety fans worked out. Didn't mean to sound almighty there with my post, only worry about the falling branch of trajectory when it can hurt others. Some have built ranges and forgot that rounds that go up do come down in awkward places. Sounds like you have it beat though. Good shooting and may you ring many a gong!

Stefan - You are shooting a right angle triangle and the ballistic range for elevation is the short leg whether you are at the top or at the bottom. However never forget that the wind and weather effects is figured on the long leg! Thus you may have an actual range of 600 meters wheich you figure wind drift while the gravity range is only 450 meters. Adds fun to the shooting huh. :-)

Mike - The only extractor failures that I have seen with our weapons have been due to either poor maintenence or overly large round counts. You must have had one of the bad ones that pop up to prove what great extractors they really are. :-)

Jefe - Steve is salt of the earth man! Who else would have a female of uncertain persuasion call my house at 9 at night from Panama as a joke? Wife was not amused! :-(

Hold Hard Guys!

Rick

Rick <rbowcher@aol.com>
Fayetteville, NC, USA - Thursday, July 05, 2001 at 01:18:19 (ZULU) (your host address: 152.163.207.46)


Rick,

You brought up a point that may be of interest to a few folks here, certainly to me. Could you outline proper maintainence procedure for the Rem700 action and bolt?

Thanks in advance,

Mike
Mike in Texas <mcdonald@hcn.hcnews.com>
USA - Thursday, July 05, 2001 at 01:29:34 (ZULU) (your host address: 208.232.237.60)


Would like to second the request for maintenance instructions on the Remington extractor.

Also like to second the request from a few days ago for drawings to machine stripper clip slots in model 700 actions. I'm sure there's some guys who'd do a great job. I just prefer to do my own work. Makes the warranty issue easier to deal with.

A very large thank you to Mr. Gooch & Mr. Rick on the bipod prone position. Works MUCH better than the instructions given by an alleged authority with another agency. Have found out why they went to more vertical pistol grips though. I need to work on this more.
WR Moore <wrmoore2001@yahoo.com>
deprivation, USA - Thursday, July 05, 2001 at 02:33:17 (ZULU) (your host address: 63.21.108.106)


Someone mentioned that Blackhills 300 win were all that they will shoot, could you tell me the cost/box? Just curious. No time for reloading lately.
Kelly <lovin30cal@hotmail.com>
USA - Thursday, July 05, 2001 at 02:36:03 (ZULU) (your host address: 204.212.170.21)
Kelly,

I agree. Customer service is half of what you pay for. If a company is not going to comply with their own guarantee, they won't be in business for long. A company is only as good as its word.

Just one thing though, man your last post was hot, and you really made your point, but with whom? All I'm sayin is that ya should be dealin' with the guy who f'ed up.

later

JR <jr_rcsd@hotmail.com>
rapid city, sd, USA - Thursday, July 05, 2001 at 02:53:22 (ZULU) (your host address: 63.113.85.43)


JR,

Id have to agree with you. I feel kinda silly after my stint with Winchester, but it would never had gone this far on the board.

A suggestion for anyone unsatisfied with a product they have received. Review it, or have a friend who knows what's what review it and send said review into the site for consideration. I'm sure Pete or Marius or whomever is reviewing at the time will be able to pick up on any one sided BS in the article and get decent info out for reiview. If your fair in you evaluation and fair in your testing, let the performance do the speaking for you.

Just a thought from a newbie. Hoping today finds you all in good health and high spirits.

Chris
"FatBoy"
Chris <hepkat0013@aol.com>
Heavy Rain' strong Wind, Still out shootin', Mid-Tenn, USA - Thursday, July 05, 2001 at 02:56:49 (ZULU) (your host address: 64.12.102.172)


RICK:

Same Steve I know! I grew up with him up until about 6th grade when they went south and I ran into him when I was in the 193rd. He visited one year at Christmas and there I was, in a barfight at a ski area at the age of 30 something. The fun never stops around him, but like the guy told his lawyer when asked about how he was getting along with his weightlifting cellmate named bubba; "Ya gotta luv him."

Serious note though, (for a change), what are your thoughts on this:

MTN INF CO with 3 Sniper teams deploys for peacekeeping. One team is tasked for company support forward of the FFU (being the base camp), one is OPCON to the S2 and the last team stands down and pulls some security at the base camp.

What do you think about that? I realize its vague on the scenario.
Jefe <diabloazul01@hotmail.com>
- Thursday, July 05, 2001 at 03:25:50 (ZULU) (your host address: 200.30.103.130)


Sun shades, ran accross a site lens-shade.com...

I saw something similer, if not exactly the same, at a gun show recently. The tubes appeared to be made out of closed cell foam rubber. Very light and flexible enough you could fold one up and stick it in your back pocket.. But, not being affixed to the scope through any significant means other than a stretch friction fit, it took very, and I mean very little to push the tube off-axis to where you couldn't see a thing through the scope. A cable tie would likely be necessary.
 

MikeL <mlitscher@wi.rr.com>
Brew City, WI, USA - Thursday, July 05, 2001 at 07:41:43 (ZULU) (your host address: 65.25.160.112)


Ref: M3LR Tracking

I know this subject has been discussed "ad nauseum" but here goes.

I've got my 175's @ 2,675 fps and I'm using the .30-06 dial. (I'm told it's supposed to match.)

At ranges out to 600 yards I'm using on the average two minutes less than the dial range marks. I know I can just log the data and shoot the actual come-ups but if that's the case some of the utility of the dial is lost.

I'm going to re-chrono my loads to be sure they aren't faster than originally thought. However I'm only loading 43.3 grains of Varget now.

Thoughts?

out
 

Kevin R. Mussack (Andy's Dad) <kmussack@aol.com>
Clifton Springs, New York, USA - Thursday, July 05, 2001 at 12:24:36 (ZULU) (your host address: 64.80.33.70)


Anyone care to team up for the Snipers Paradise Match in late October in Texas? They still have a few team slots open. Email if interested. Thanks...
TonyY <ayackowski@pershing.com>
Woodbridge, NJ, USA - Thursday, July 05, 2001 at 12:33:32 (ZULU) (your host address: 32.97.88.102)
Remington Extractors. What to do with them. Clean the bolt face with a tooth brush and leave the extractor alone. Many stories have gone around about how this is a weak part. Some will tell you the M40's have M16 extractors. Well when I went to Pendleton I looked and none of the USMC weapons has anything but a Remington extractor. That includes the new M40A3 rifle. I have never broken one. The only ones I have seen broken were done by some gun knoww it all that had to get it out to clean.

On a bolt problem for a Remington 700. If you need a new bolt the weapon will probably have to go back to Remington. They quit selling bolts years ago because of liability. Future never change the extractor type unless no choice like in a 338 Lapua conversion. I would say the best thing to do is have someone like George Gardner take a look at it. Neither you or the smith will ever agree at this point to whats fair.

On Bipods, I also use an Eagle Scope protector when all else fails to shoot off the concrete. If I dont get a good position that way I go to the pack. Next is just edge the feet into the soil. Any hard surface will cause the bounce. You can play with loading force onto the legs but then you have to be equal in the force applied to get it consistent and that is a nightmare to learn. While on this subject if you have a Parker Hale type pod you will probably get better groups by learning to load the bipod. This is because it is one wobble after another with that thing. The force will take out some of it. Now dont try and break it just a few pounds to sette it.

On a computor article. I think that thing is being pushed by Trigger 50 and he would probably do his own thing on who writes what. I dont think they will beat down my door for an evaluation. I still believe in dope it dial it dump it. Dope to me is Temp, range, wind, ammo, elevation. There are certain calculations I dont use that will be on the comp. that I have never used and that would probably leave me out of the loop. BUt hell I am with Rick and Gooch on this so not bad company.LOL

Undude back t his hole

PS nice to see you you old Pablito you!
MikeMiller <tactical@tacticalintervention.com>
Calif, USA - Thursday, July 05, 2001 at 13:53:35 (ZULU) (your host address: 148.165.85.148)


Gents,

On the M3 BDC...I'm just now working up loads to match my cam and am learning about the scope, as well.

Bravo probably has as much experience with this, on M25's, as any of us. Since I'm new to the M3 I really can't comment.

Stan, it would be nice if you would write up your procedure for "tensioning" the A.R.M.S mount and setting up your scope on the M25 for posterity. HINT, HINT!

Undude has it right, IMHO. Dope it, Dial it, Dump it! You're wasting valuable time doing anything else. Works for me...

By the way, glad to see the Marines let you loose. You're lucky. They have the habit of hanging onto "a few good men"...;-)

Semper Fi,

Wes
Wes Howe <wsaa@proaxis.com>
Blodgett, OR, USA - Thursday, July 05, 2001 at 14:11:19 (ZULU) (your host address: 198.145.248.5)


Where can I find George Gardner?? I wanted to ask him about doing some bolt work if he is interested.

Thanks,
chase <varmintpro@hotmail.com>
USA - Thursday, July 05, 2001 at 14:45:14 (ZULU) (your host address: 167.234.102.23)


Remington Extractors..
I have had several replaced, but still think they work just fine. I had bought a 25-06 and it went through two and I finally put a Sako style in it when it was rebarreled for the 2nd time. I just replaced one in my 6.5x284 this last week but this rifle is on at least its 3rd or 4th barrel.

I think the problem is more with the smith who puts them in. It seems that the older rivit ones are kindof tricky for some people and they do tend to screw them up. I have never touched the one on my 308/260 and its on its 3rd barrel.

Reputable Smiths..
Most any quality rifle builder will take care of a problem ASAP since their work is their reputation. We all need to understand that even the best smiths will have a bad barrel or have something slip by. The problem arises when they don't correct it or offer to make it right but those people won't stay in business long.

Rick or any other long range genious..
Why in the hell do I go out one day and shoot a course nearly a full MOA low from 600yds on out when I have shot it just fine for several weeks with the same dials under nearly identical conditions!!!The ammo I use is NOT temp sensitive and is out of the same batch. I have had this happen before and it drives me NUTS and gives me NIGHTMARES!!!

The humidity and dew points weren't as high as when I shot it several days earlier so thats out. The wind was out of the exact same direction at nearly the same speed. The only real difference was time of day 0700am to 1630 for the previous time.
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Thursday, July 05, 2001 at 16:21:10 (ZULU) (your host address: 207.41.18.3)


Extractors: I have or have had 7 or 8 remington 700 actions over the years and I did have one that was big trouble with an extractor. Finally was determined to be the lapping/squaring of the bolt face and lugs that were not correctly aligned. Could only guess that it canted the round slightly and caused excess expansion on one side of the round because one side of the chamber had slightly more room, but I'm not an engineer or smith. I started having problems from day one with fired rounds slipping off the extractor when cycling the action. Seemed it would happen every 10th round or so until finally trying to force a round out the extractor broke. The rifle was fairly new so I was pissed. First tried to get Remington to replace the bolt but because the smith had modified it all bets were off so I went the Sako extractor route. Seemed to work for awhile but even then a round would stick too often for me. I then had a different smith look it over and he did something around the recoil lug and readjusted headspace and whatever and that seemed to fix the problem. My only problem now is the gun shots 1/4 MOA but I don't really trust it. Murphy's law I guess.

Pat seem to remember something about chasing the light. Lights up, sights down, Lights down sights up or something like that but most of my shooting is only to 350 yds these days so it dosen't really matter in my case. Maybe the guru's could explain light.
TonyY <ayackowski@pershing.com>
Woodbridge, NJ, USA - Thursday, July 05, 2001 at 17:09:26 (ZULU) (your host address: 32.97.88.102)


M700 Extractors:

Only ever saw one fail. It was during a High Power Silhouette Championship. The guy stepped off the line long enough to "borrow" a bolt from another shooter. (Kinda makes your skin crawl don't it?) He went on to finish and placed high enough to win in his class.

Ha...borrow a bolt....go figure.

out
Kevin R. Mussack (Andy's Dad) <kmussack@aol.com>
Clifton Springs, New York, USA - Thursday, July 05, 2001 at 18:16:14 (ZULU) (your host address: 64.80.33.70)


Mike i read your post about trying to go to remington for a new bolt and i have to say this to anyone who may do that. Make sure you talk with someone at Remington before you send the action (im sure they going to ask you to send it in)MAKE clear what you want and keep names.My gunsmith send MY action for a new bolt to them.Instead THEY destroy my action,send a new one (had to do an FFL transfer)and try to charge full price.Idont know the end of it it was betwen them.
Also i have a question on the bipod issue i do not understand what the exprecion load the bipod means.Is it when you lock the legs to the rearmost by pusing or forwardmost by puling the gun?
Thanks for any replys.
jim <dimlinos@yahoo.com>
USA - Thursday, July 05, 2001 at 18:17:16 (ZULU) (your host address: 199.232.245.213)
Pappa Romeo this is Mike Foxtrot four-zero

shots over - fire-mission accomplished

standing down till next engagement

Out
Fire-control officer <webmaster@snipercountry.com>
RSA - Thursday, July 05, 2001 at 19:17:14 (ZULU) (your host address: 155.239.180.181)


Tony..
I know what your talking about but as I remember it only had to do with iron sights because of the shadow that the sun cast. It was always a problem for the highpower shooters. Maybe it will cause the same problem with a scope but I wouldn't think so. Like you, I will defer to the experts.
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Thursday, July 05, 2001 at 19:20:42 (ZULU) (your host address: 207.41.18.3)
Chase,

Call George Gardner 816-221-1844
Michael <mike1000@pacbell.net>
SJ, CA, USA - Thursday, July 05, 2001 at 20:38:19 (ZULU) (your host address: 63.192.208.6)


Rosterfarians,

Posted some Book/Movie reviews from Scott - take a look.

Marius
Marius <webmaster@snipercountry.com>
RSA - Thursday, July 05, 2001 at 21:21:03 (ZULU) (your host address: 155.239.180.215)


TonyY - Lights up - sights up

When the light is bright, your eye can more easily resolve the edge of the black, so you tend to hold on the true edge (lower), rather than further into the black when the edge is indistinct.

HTH

Mike
BMG Mike <bmgman@swbell.net>
USA - Thursday, July 05, 2001 at 23:25:05 (ZULU) (your host address: 64.123.15.245)


Any word from Patron Gooch on match details. Time to line up vacation!
 

Bolt <reeldoctor@mindspring.com>
NC, USA - Friday, July 06, 2001 at 00:39:20 (ZULU) (your host address: 63.50.54.201)


Shoulda been more clear, but I ASS_U_ME_ed that anyone desiring top-notch accuracy from an m1a would NOT mount a bipod to their gas system.
I got my paws on a Harris bipod adapter for the '1a and inletted and Steel-bedded it into the inside of the forearm "under the gas system".
Incoming...
Spud,
Out
Dennis <usmcspud@mindspring.com>
Merced, Kalisocialistfornia, USA - Friday, July 06, 2001 at 02:54:54 (ZULU) (your host address: 165.247.225.84)
Gents,

Just back from the range. Thursday evening has become our "snper" get together for a few of us. Tonight we worked from the 200 yard line. I decided to take my newly broken in .223 Stealth and a handload that has show some promise at 100 yards.

Conditions: Wind 10-12 mph variable, temperature 70 degrees, clear sky. Shooting was done prone.

My load was a .223 Winchester case(match prep'd), 24.6 gr. IMR-4895, Federal 205 Match primer, and a Sierra 69 gr. Match King.

In spite of the wind all groups were sub-moa. Several were less than .5 MOA. Correct elevation for this load was +1 MOA from my 100 yard zero. Need to chronograph it this next week, but it looks like we have a WINNER! Damn, that Stealth shoots!

All for now. I hear my bed calling...

Semper Fi,

Wes
Wes Howe <wsaa@proaxis.com>
Bldogett, OR, USA - Friday, July 06, 2001 at 04:47:08 (ZULU) (your host address: 198.145.248.1)


Intelligence Mission:

Does anyone have any information about any of the hand held wind/conditions meters. Since I am looking at recording a little more data regarding the range conditions when gathering load information I figured I might buy one. The unit that seems the most promising right now is the Kestrel 4000, running about $300.

Here is some basic info:

The Kestrel® 4000 Pocket Weather™ Tracker is the next generation of weather monitoring. You can now measure EVERY major environmental condition, easily and accurately, right in the palm of your hand. The chart mode allows users to recall and graph up to 250 measurements, along with the date and time of storage. Barometric Pressure, Altitude, Density Altitude, Temperature, Humidity, Wind Speed, Wind Chill, Dew Point, Wet Bulb, and Heat Index... all in one pocket sized instrument.

It is about twice the price of their 3000 but has altitude and barometric pressure and the others don't. Anyone know of another product that will fit the bill?
 

Byron <byburnham@earthlink.net>
CA, USA - Friday, July 06, 2001 at 05:23:41 (ZULU) (your host address: 24.41.42.205)


Byron, I am a pretty big novice,and I like toys, but I think the model you are looking at is overkill. I have the basic one that just reads the wind speed, and it is good for knowing the wind speed where you are standing period. It is an interesting tool, that can be helpful, but from what little I have learned so far, you really need to just go shoot A LOT and at different conditions and distances.

I suspect that you usually know your shooting elevation, and at most distances them effect of different barometric differences will be very slight.

Spend the difference on a long range rifle course and ammo and go shoot.
Michael <mike1000@pacbell.net>
Gearing up for New Mexico, USA - Friday, July 06, 2001 at 05:52:20 (ZULU) (your host address: 63.192.208.6)


Kestral:
I use the "cheapo" 2000 model. (just wind and temp) It would be neat to have all that other data to record but I don't know if having that data would help me shoot any better.

M40A1:
Just disassembled cleaned completely and reassembled the new rig. The action screws were only finger tight. Now they're at 65 in.lb. We'll see today if that makes a difference.

Oh well off to do some PT...I like it, I love it, I want more of it.........

out
Kevin R. Mussack (Andy's Dad) <kmussack@aol.com>
Clifton Springs, New York, USA - Friday, July 06, 2001 at 08:27:20 (ZULU) (your host address: 64.12.102.174)


Byron,

I use the Brunton "Sherpa" wind/baro/temp meter, (for several things) and find it to be very accurate. That being said, the real secret is STILL to go out and shoot lots. If you want to dope the wind and temp, then check it with the meter, go for it until you're comfortable. Other than being a learning tool, a meter might become a crutch that would really slow you down, and the d@#m batteries WILL die at the worst time. Unless you travel a bunch, the factors other than wind are more seasonal than something you need to worry about daily.
Flattop <BKFlattop@aol.com>
USA - Friday, July 06, 2001 at 12:45:21 (ZULU) (your host address: 205.161.197.133)


Kevin..
The loose action screws will definatly make a difference in how well a gun shoots. You also mentioned trying to get on the comeups with your M3 using the 30-06 ring. Don't get hung up on trying to come out on their number for the range make your own if you have to have a number for the yardage.

I always use the MOAs at the bottom of the ring. For quick shooting I painted over the yardage numbers at the top and then scribed in my own yardage numbers over the "Correct" MOA for "MY" pet load, not theirs, and it works great, just a suggestion.

Wind Meters..
I use the simple hand held with the speed and temp. Works great but as they say don't let it become a crutch. I make the wind call "FIRST" then I check my call to see how close I am.

The thing that you really need to learn to read is the mirage or the grass and folage. It will tell you what the wind is doing down range. If your shooting across canyons or down or across draws the wind down range can actually be blowing the opposite direction your reading at your position. Just something else to confuse everyone!!(HA)
 

Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Friday, July 06, 2001 at 13:33:26 (ZULU) (your host address: 207.41.18.3)


Lady and Gents,

Where can I get an armorers manual for the Steyr SSG series of rifles? In english. Thanks.

Semper Fi

Paul <paulcockerham@att.net>
Reston, VA, USA - Friday, July 06, 2001 at 13:43:35 (ZULU) (your host address: 216.173.17.78)


Byron:

I have researched a lot about the windmeters. I thought Kestrel 3000 was a bit overkill but the Kestrel 4000 definately is overkill for shooting. For weather freaks it is a good meter, for shooting it is too complex.

I think Kestrel 1000 or Kestrel 2000 would be enough for most shooters. If you need a little bit more stuff, go and buy a Alti WindWatch. www.sciencecompany.com in Denver sells both Kestrel and Alti WindWatch. The Kestrel 1000 was about $65 inc.s&h.

Kestrel 3000 is there $112.95 inc. S&H
Alti WindWatch is there $119.95 inc. S&H (special, not many available)

I bought a Alti WindWatch a while ago from Science Company. It meters temperature, barometric pressure (registers always the last 16 hours), wind speed, wind chill, altitude 0-30000 ft. It floats, weighs around two ounces, has a 2 year Warranty and is Swiss made. The same unit is sold also under Silva, Brunton, Windtec and probably other brand names.

Using wind meters: I think the best use of these is to use them to learn wind estimation. First you feel the wind and guess the speed. Then you verify it with the meter. Over time you will learn to estimate the winds pretty well. Long range shooting you will only learn by shooting. Electronics can help a little bit but they can only help, they can not shoot the rifle.

BTW www.sciencecompany.com is the cheapest place in the net for Kestrel 1000/2000/3000 and Alti WindWatch that I have found. In some other places Alti WindWatch costs around $169-$230 so I think this company has a pretty good deal on these meters.
Hexa <juhola@luukku.com>
USA - Friday, July 06, 2001 at 15:18:20 (ZULU) (your host address: 64.58.22.7)


DISCLAIMER: THE FOLLOWING IS A NON-SNIPING POST.
Okillie-dokillie,
I was at the range yesterday with my Bushmaster 16" carbine. I came to the conclusion that after firing my tuned PSS quite a bit, I dan't care for the short BM too much anymore (heavy trigger, short sight radius, I just don't shoot it that well...plus I don't have access to any plinking ranges anymore, which is why I got the thing when I was living in PA). I thought about getting one of them 'thar flat-top uppers with the 24" Bull barrel. If I go that route, who makes a good one? I assume (yes I know what happens when I ass-u-me), it still won't be as accurate as a Rem VS or Stealth in .223? Should I trade it on a Stealth, VS, or Anschutz 64MPR OR get one of the "varmint" uppers from a good manufacturer?
Thanks a mil guys,

P.S. I just thought I'd cover me arse with the dislaimer above.
Rich S. <RS1441@aol.com>
Bal'mer, MD, USA - Friday, July 06, 2001 at 16:13:50 (ZULU) (your host address: 152.163.201.182)


Ref: M40A1 Update

HOOOYAH!
I just returned from my lunch hour at the range next door. (Yes, I know.)

Tightening the action screws to 65 in.lbs reduced group sizes by half. I just shot .46 MOA. (very pleased)

Average velocity is 2,720 fps with a SD of 9 fps.

Group is 1/2" above the POA.

This might explain why I'm 2 minutes under the M3LR dial settings at 600 yards. Can I get a check on that?

I established the velocity of 2,675 with cases from which I had pulled the bullets. Could the increased neck tension of a once loaded case result in a 45 fps velocity increase?

Back to the loading bench.

out
Kevin R. Mussack (Andy's Dad) <kmussack@aol.com>
Clifton Springs, New York, USA - Friday, July 06, 2001 at 16:52:21 (ZULU) (your host address: 64.80.33.70)


Dudes,

Was up a McClellan on 3 July talking to the range officer and the scheduling lady. We are in. All I need is some feedback on dates from ya'll.

This will be an International League of Riflemen OPEN Practical Precision Rifle (PPR) event with military/Police and citizen classifications. ILR is going to be a CMP affiliated organization so entry will require you to be eligible for entry in Civilian Marksmanship Program activities. (You must have no legal restrictions on firearms possesion/ownership and not be a member in any organization that advocates the violent overthrow of the US Government.)

The ranges at Fort Mac are closed 10-12 and 22-25 Nov. Weekends are rough since the reserve forces eat them up and we risk getting bumped on weekends. We can have reporting/registration on a sunday and shoot mon-tues with awards on tuesday evening.

Those of you that are serious about attending give me some ideas on dates and I'll take them into consideration. Any conflicting events anyone knows of?

McClellan in in Anniston, AL, between Birminham and Atlanta on I-20. I'm working on a special rate for hotels.

Next year we will have a series of PPR matches accross the country. Maybe one in Canada.

Those that attend the match this Nov. will recieve a special coin commemorating the first ILR Practical Precision Rifle match and will receive a charter membership to the ILR.

What is a good entry fee for those who are thinking of attending? We will have prizes including a rifle or two. Entry will also require a membership to ILR which looks like $40 for annual and $300 for lifetime.

More info on ILR and the match will be posted on the ILR website (www.riflemen.net) when it is up in a few days (we hope).

If you yahoos have any comments for me please send them to goochkw@riflemen.net.

Here we go!!

Out
Gooch <goochkw@riflemen.net>
USA - Friday, July 06, 2001 at 16:56:24 (ZULU) (your host address: 209.214.53.91)


Howdy guys! Been lurking for a long time, and e-mailing lots to you guys privately. Thought it time to start posting "in the open".

On the M1A bipod question, the ONLY way to go is to bed a stud into the fore-end. Ideally, there should be a steel plate bedded into a channel inletted in the barrel channel, then the stud mounted to that. Even better is to have the stock formed around some steel plates, like McMillan does for their Wichita sling swivels. Not much extra dough, but you've got to order it that way from the start.

Anyone putting on one of those versa-pod spigots in place of the gas cylinder plug needs his head examined.

And to Wes: I'm also interested in reading an article on mounting the ARMS base up to a M1A receiver. When you get it, could you pass it on?

Hope this isn't too goofy for a newby post, I know how you guys hate those.
Victor <gasgunguy@yahoo.com>
Kalifornicate-ya, USA - Friday, July 06, 2001 at 17:55:10 (ZULU) (your host address: 12.9.223.237)


A good Day

I just received 500 pieces of Winchester brass and a box of 500 SMK175s. I have 1000 Federal Match primers. As soon as I can get an 8# can of Varget I will be in business. All smiles!!!!

Speaking of primers, what are some opinions on Fed Match vs. CCI Bench Rest?

Semper Fi

Paul <paulcockerham@att.net>
Reston, VA, USA - Friday, July 06, 2001 at 18:15:45 (ZULU) (your host address: 216.173.17.78)


TAC-ORD
Jim Ryan with Tac-Ord and I have come up with an agreement to fix my rifle problem. For that reason, I come to you to apologize for the mishap that took place over the last few days and hopefully to restore any credibility that may have been lost from Mr. Ryan’s company due to my posts on the Roster. I also offer my thanks to those individuals who helped to arbitrate this situation. At this point, the deal has not gone through but terms have been agreed upon and when it is all said and done, I will offer one more post to put an end to this. I never realized the power behind the Duty Roster until now. I offer my thanks and respect to all individuals that offered advice, made comments and especially to those who helped bring about a solution.
 

-chase

chase <varmintpro@hotmail.com>
boise, ID, USA - Friday, July 06, 2001 at 20:08:19 (ZULU) (your host address: 167.234.101.89)


As a 22-year law-enforcement sniper veteran I have noticed an on-going and as yet unresolved problem with our sniper weapons, specifically with the scopes involved. For reference we use a Leupold 3.5 x 10 x 40; a Leupold 3.5 x 10 x 50; and a U.S. Optics 10 power SN6. The team rifles involved are two 308 model 700 Remingtons and one 308 model 722 Remington.
The rifle scopes keep shifting the point of aim (not unique to any one rifle) and it appears to be a characteristic of the scopes.
With the smallest of "taps" on either side of the exit/objective end of the scope (as would occur if you slightly bumped the rifle exiting a vehicle) we have experienced lateral point of aim shifts from 1 inch to 15 inches depending on the impact. In one instance there was a two inch shift of impact when the rifle, housed in a Pelican Hard Case, simply rolled onto it's side from an upright position.
The testing we've done includes tapping the scope and the rifle at various points. A dramatic shift is noticed when tapping the objective end of the scope on either the left or right side. The three scopes involved have been sent back to the manufacturers and are within manufacturing tolerances. The bedding in two rifles checks out okay, however, one of the rifle actions was glued into the stock anyway to test it. The ring and bases were checked and found to be secure.
After thoroughly checking all the possible causes of shifting the problem seems to point right back into an internal problem within the scope. Could this be a characteristic of scope design with no problem elimination beyond "Don't bump it!" This "shifting" is clearly unacceptable in a hostage life or death situation.
Has anyone else encountered this problem? If not, would you be willing to field test your own weapon and get back to us? All it takes is a minimal lateral bump on the objective.
Our last bit of frustration was when we added a 20-year sniper veteran to our sniper team and he was asked "Would this small tap affect your group?" He was sure it would not, so we had him shoot a group with our glued-in rifle and he shot a nice clover-leaf right in the X ring. But when the small tap was applied to the right side of the objective lens, he shot another clover-leaf group eight inches to the right. Now we have another member of the No-Bumping-The-Scope club but no real answers.
Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.
Jan Thomas <JanT4444@onemain.com>
Placerville, CA, USA - Friday, July 06, 2001 at 20:16:23 (ZULU) (your host address: 216.119.25.72)
"No-Bumping-The-Scope-Club"

Yikes!
You describe quality scopes and rifles.....I would suspect the mounts and rings.......

Go Badger and never look back.

FWIW here's my set-up:
Rifle drilled and tapped to #8-32
Badger one piece steel 20 MOA base Torx screwed and loctited in place
Badger rings torqued to 65 in.lbs to the base
Top ring half attached by Torx screws at 35 in.lbs.

My SWS took a 4' fall to thinly carpeted concrete and never shifted zero.

Good luck officer Thomas.

out

Kevin R. Mussack (Andy's Dad) <kmussack@aol.com>
Clifton Springs, New York, USA - Friday, July 06, 2001 at 20:59:19 (ZULU) (your host address: 64.80.33.70)


Scopes and mounts shifting? I suspect a mount problem. The scopes you listed do not historically have problems with this. Matter of fact I would like to know your testing procedures to establish this?

For example I have four department weapons with Leupolds and three with US Optics. None of which ahve ever changed zero from similar things. The Leupolds will if you beat the hell out of them but not under normal use. Certainly not from the case falling over. The US Optics have never shifted zero no matter how we treated them.

If you are getting what you descripe you ahve big problems and no way you would get a zero! If it moves from a tap on the scope a violent recoil would certainly move it. The problem you describe is usually a broken reticle but not likely to happen to all unless you have animals with rocks working for you.LOL Seriously look to the mounts then the action screws (Torque) and thebbls being truly free floated.

If you need further help get ahold of me via email
MikeMiller <tactical@tacticalintervention.com>
Calif, USA - Friday, July 06, 2001 at 21:45:31 (ZULU) (your host address: 148.165.85.148)


I've been on the market for a good rifle that is sub-moa accurate and built tough as nails. I'm thinking about putting a chunk of change on a deposit for a Chandler rifle, but before I do, I'd like to know if any of you have had experience with Armament Technolgy's AT1-C24/M24 rifles. Does anyone ave comparative experience with these rifles or the Armament Tech rifle? Thanks....DS.
Dustin <dustinsmart@hotmail.com>
College Station, TX, USA - Friday, July 06, 2001 at 21:56:18 (ZULU) (your host address: 129.109.166.146)
Shifty Scopes -

I have a Loopy M3LR mounted to a Rem 700 on Badger base and rings. Everything is properly torqued and Loctited in place.

While I won't admit to being as clumsy as Kevin (Andy's dad) is (LOL), my gun gets it's share of banging around in normal everyday use, even when in its case. I have yet to loose my zero due to rough handling.

Sounds like you guys went top drawer for equipment - except for the scope mount stuff.

Moe
Moe Mensale <mjmensale@aol.com>
Boca Raton, FL, USA - Saturday, July 07, 2001 at 02:09:12 (ZULU) (your host address: 152.163.194.212)


Howdy, Hogs!

Paul, Norm Crawford was 3rd in the Leach Cup 1,000 yard match at Perry in '98, and with the Palma Match he qualified for the '99 US Palma Team that went to South Africa. That's 1,000 yards, iron-sighted, shooting a 155 Sierra Match King.

Traded out two guns I never shot for a Harrington and Richardson 50's-make M1 Garand for the John Garand Match at Perry. CMP delivered a can of 280 rounds, M1 30-06 Ball to the door for $60 bucks, plus 15 for shipping. They've got 5,000 rounds of GI .22 Standard Velocity Match for $75 again.

One of my guys got a George Gardner 300 Win Mag for Alaskan bears. Nice rifle!

Darren Dong / Mike Miller, when we were circling over San Francisco Bay to jump into the Giants/A's game at Pac Bell Stadium I saw a 600 yard KD range about 2-3 miles west of the north end of the Golden Gate Bridge. Is that still active (I think it used to be Fort Mason or Fort Funston)?

Anyone else heading to Perry?

Back to the garage to load.
 
 
 
 

Sinister Dave <mliwanag@nc.rr.com>
USA - Saturday, July 07, 2001 at 04:32:56 (ZULU) (your host address: 24.88.228.100)


Sinister Dave,

That is the first that I heard of this. I know there is a 200 yard range up North in Santa Rosa. East of us is Chabot with a 100 and 200 yard range. We have several ranges down South and they are either 100 or 200 or just 100. East of us is Sacramento, that goes out to 1000 yards. I think I will look into this and get back to you on this.

Darren...
Semper Fi
Darren <ddong@usmc.net>
San Francisco, CA, USA - Saturday, July 07, 2001 at 04:51:57 (ZULU) (your host address: 64.24.38.136)


Thank you so much for those who have taken time to respond to my shifting scope query both here and in direct e-mails to me. While most of the suggestions were great and constructive, we have already taken many of the steps described. I am formulating a more detailed listing of the tests and their results to post here. Please be patient. And again, your input has been greatly appreciated. We've got a good, professional group here. Thank you!
Jan Thomas <JanT4444@onemain.com>
Placerville, CA, USA - Saturday, July 07, 2001 at 19:21:29 (ZULU) (your host address: 216.119.16.79)
I'll be at Perry, for the President's Hundred at least. Not sure what else I'm going to shoot, since I'm already distinguished and don't have much of a chance of winning overall in the NTI. Thinking about the LR stuff, but it's pricy. Might just go hiking and climbing in the UP after the Garand Match and the Rattle Battle. Semper Fidelis...Ken M
Ken M <target1371@aol.com>
IL, USA - Sunday, July 08, 2001 at 01:04:44 (ZULU) (your host address: 24.4.253.164)
Wow! Has it been slow on the Roster! Is everybody off shooting?

Next week a number of us will be off in New Mexico while James and Mike try to teach us to shoot better! It should be a pretty interesting crowd with a number of nice rifles. Rumor has it that George (G&A Precision) might even show........

Bravo, we will miss your ever ready opinions and Bravo Brew! Hang in there!

Michael
Michael <mike1000@pacbell.net>
SJ, CA, USA - Sunday, July 08, 2001 at 06:07:56 (ZULU) (your host address: 63.192.208.6)


Slow....

Yep we've been off shootin'.

Andy and I shot in a High Power Match yesterday.
I took My SMLE No. 4, Mk2.. I shot a 398 with the old warhorse.
My Garand is in the shop getting a new barrel and what not.

Next summer I'm going to go to Camp Perry and attend the school there and shoot the National Matches. I've never been there but have always wanted to go.

Now there's a spot for a Rendezvous!

out
Kevin R. Mussack (Andy's Dad) <kmussack@aol.com>
Clifton Springs, New York, USA - Sunday, July 08, 2001 at 11:06:32 (ZULU) (your host address: 205.188.195.59)


Dustin,

I can not speak of the Chandler rifles, but I have extensive experience with Armament Technology rifles and I am throughly impressed with the quality and accuracy. Andy knows how to build rifles and you can't go wrong. On the Chandler side of the house I have heard good things about their rifles. I will be attending his Blackwater Lodge course in November so I can give you some more feedback then! Good luck. I recommend you contact Andy and give him a shout.

Jeff
JC Wilson <blackhawk@mb.sympatico.ca>
Canada - Sunday, July 08, 2001 at 14:03:29 (ZULU) (your host address: 205.200.254.110)


Kev,

Good for you for deciding to shoot at Perry! Bring your son along as well.

Summer 1999 was my first-ever trip to the National Matches, something I'd read about every year since I was an NRA Junior Shooter at 12 years old. Every September when I got the "National Matches Results" edition of the American Rifleman, I'd always wondered what it would be like.

My first competition day at the Nationals I was standing on the 200 yard line, and was wondering in my head...I was shooting with around 1250 of the best service rifle shooters in the United States.

"I'm shooting as a soldier in the US Army.
I'm shooting at the National Matches at Camp Perry...
I'm shooting in the President's Hundred...

I have no idea where those first five rounds went."

The Nationals schedule is pretty varied -- if you don't have a lot of vacation time, you can shoot just the President's Hundred and the Leg, or if you can just spare a weekend you can shoot the Garand Match on Saturday (everyone brings an "Arms Room" grade M1, Carbine, Springfield, Johnson, or M1917, or they'll issue you an M1 on the line. Everyone shoots issue Ball at 200 yards: 5 rounds to zero, and 10 rounds for record, prone; 10 rounds sitting rapid; and 10 rounds standing). If CMP issued you the M1, and you don't have one, this year they're giving you the option of buying that rifle, right there!

If you've never shot standing and sitting, and you just have a scoped rifle you can shoot the three days of "Canadian Cup" Long Range competition at 800, 900, and 1,000 yards (the only restriction is the third and last day is .308 caliber iron-sights only in the Palma Match).

See you there!

Sinister Dave <mliwanag@nc.rr.com>
Fayetteville, NC, USA - Sunday, July 08, 2001 at 14:21:47 (ZULU) (your host address: 24.88.228.100)


Gents: Regarding Chandler Rifles

Dustin and Jeff.

I have the first experimental 6.5 X .284 that Iron Brigade Armory built. They since have three more in process. I am more than pleased with the rifle. It is a functional work of art. Mine consistently does 1.5" at 600 yards with selected handloads, holds zero, and is a joy to shoot.

As for Armament Tech rifles...I have no experience with them. Note, there are a number of makers out there that build fine rifles. Rice, Gardner, and others have a super reputation. No matter who you decide upon, go with a "known quantity", and don't "cheap charlie" it. You'll be much better off in the long run.

The downside is that you'll wait about a year for the Chandler gun. I can't vouch for the other shops. If you want a real USMC spec gun this is the ONLY way to get one. Spendy, but worth every penny!

Semper Fi,

Wes Howe
Wes Howe <wsaa@proaxis.com>
Bldogett, OR, USA - Sunday, July 08, 2001 at 15:46:05 (ZULU) (your host address: 198.145.248.36)


THANKS George Gardner at G.A. Precision
I received my REM 300mag back from George and it looks great. He installed a Rock 5R barrel, did a complete action job, Bedded the stock. and refinished with teflon. Also a quick turn around. He was great to deal with and answered ALL my questions including the stupid ones. It has been to hot in Iowa this weekend to shoot, but can't wait. He shot some excellent groups with it. Reloads and factory. THANKS ALOT George. THANKS Doug
Doug <dkb@pcpartner.net>
USA - Sunday, July 08, 2001 at 15:49:41 (ZULU) (your host address: 199.120.66.21)
Dustin, I have an AT1-C24 rifle, it is put together flawlessly and has done everything I've asked of it. It still shoots better than me, but I'm working on it. It took over a year to receive it, evidently Andy had a major illness that set his schedule back. The recommendation I got from Kent Gooch a couple of years ago was: If you want the best M40 clone, get a Chandler rifle; If you want the best M24 clone, get an AT. Which style is best for you is a matter of individual taste.
Grasshopper <wd6cmu@earthlink.net>
Sweating in the dark, Kalifornia, USA - Sunday, July 08, 2001 at 16:27:29 (ZULU) (your host address: 24.221.161.16)
Dustin,
I waited about 5 weeks for my last Gardner rifle. It is one of my best shooting rifles to date. I have a couple of rifles from Jerry, and a couple from George. I now have run out of excuses! If I f*&$ up, and miss it is only me!

I will be dragging a couple of them out to NM on Thursday.

Just like Wes said, buy from a quality maker, and you will be happy. Then shoot the piss out of it!
Michael <mike1000@pacbell.net>
SJ, CA, USA - Sunday, July 08, 2001 at 16:44:38 (ZULU) (your host address: 63.192.208.6)


have followed this board with interest for some time ....... i would like to avoid a mistake , if that is what i am contemplating ...... and i trust a resident expert or two can help with some input ..... i have a couple bolt action 1950's era 30-06 rifles in fine condition ( win mod 70 and sporterized springfield military ) was interested in converting to 308 ...... specifically lapua scenar ...... by means of chamber inserts ...... not interested in rebarrell as both are fine shooters ...... since the 30-06 to 308 insert was developed for m1 and i've read of no serious drawbacks ........ is this reversable change possible without compromizing the weapons ?? ...... it appears the difference is in the shoulder of the round only ...... i have been completely unsuccessful in finding any info whatsoever on the net detailing the outcome of such a conversion although the inserts are available from a number of sources ........ many thanks .... j
j-david <jdm@cac.net>
brighton, mich, USA - Sunday, July 08, 2001 at 23:42:22 (ZULU) (your host address: 216.90.51.63)
j-david, re inserts:

I think you are embarking on a program to take good shooting rifles and convert them to noise-makers. Yes, there are chamber inserts out there. They add about 1/2 inch of freebore, in a game where shooters try to put the bullets into or very near the lands to minimize jump.

I'd be surprised if your accuracy was up to your expectations.

My $.02

Mike
BMG Mike <bmgman@swbell.net>
USA - Monday, July 09, 2001 at 02:22:20 (ZULU) (your host address: 64.123.15.245)


Gents, I finally have some good word to pass on about the 300 Win Short Mag, (300 WSM) I finished two rifles recently and can say I am impressed with the results.

Rifle #1, Remington 700 Short Action, McMillan McHale Stock, HS Precision stainless triggerguard, detachable 3 round mag. Obermeyer 1-10 twist 5R stainless barrel, 26'' length .975 at muzzle. Tuned Remington trigger. Finished in black KG teflon.

Rifle #2, Dakota 76, Solid bottom single shot, OD/Black McMillan McHale stock. Cooper Precision/Mike Rock 1-10 stainless 5R barrel 26"
.875 at muzzle. Finished in black KG teflon.
 

Both rifles were broken in by firing 10 singles and then 3 shot groups for the next 30. Both barrels seemed to foud veary little if not at all. I did experience some pressure problems with factory Winchester 180 gr loads, in rifle #1 only. This was probably due to the Tight .298 Obermeyer Bore. No problems at all with any other loads. Here is the Scoop:

Win 180 gr Factory PP SP, Avg Vel Rifle#1 3080 Rifle#2 3062
Win 150 gr Factory Bal tip Avg Vel Rifle#1 3225 Rifle#2 3198

Handload #1 73 gr VV N560, 175MK Avg Vel #1 3168 #2 3130
Handload #2 55 gr Varget, 175 MK Avg Vel #1 3078 #2 3051
Handload #3 57 gr Varget, 168 MK Avg Vel #1 3123 #2 3104

Accuracy was superb with the reloads, both rifles shot like lasers .250", 3 shot groups were the normal with a couple groups in the .190" range. The worst was .480

The Factory 180 grain loads averaged about 3/4 Moa with the 150 Balistic tip factory loads this was knocked down to a 1/2 Moa average.

In all I believe the 300 WSM to be far superior to the 300 win mag in accuracy and pulling on its coattails in the horsepower department. And best of all in a Short Action!! Any of you that have been thinking of doing a rifle in this caliber or converting a short action. Thumbs up Here.

Take Care

George Out
 

George Gardner, G.A. Precision <A10XRifle@aol.com>
Kansas City, MO, USA - Monday, July 09, 2001 at 05:48:12 (ZULU) (your host address: 209.248.155.66)


"No-Bumping-The-Scope-Club"

Jan Thomas

I'm pretty rough on my gear and haven't experienced the POI shifting you describe. I'm not a "duty slotted" anything but a fairly serious varmint and long range shooter. My typical setup is a Leupold scope and Badger Rings on a heavily constructed carry rifle. My 'sniper' rifle seldom rides in it's Pelical case and my 'varmint' rigs never see a case. I generally just pile the rifle into the rear of my pickup and let it 'settle' and ride with the rest of the junk back there. (I don't abuse them but I don't baby them either. I'd guess I'm about a 6 on the "commercial airline baggage handler's" abuse scale.) I've had them take falls out of the truck onto blacktop and rocks, slip sidways off the side of the truck and clatter onto the blacktop and/or ground. I raise and lower them by rope into and out of trees and they suffering an occasional 'whack' against the truck or limb.

I've had hunters shudder and shake thier head after seeing some of the falls and tumbles the rifles and I have taken, they're obviously sure that it'd take several days at the range to get a 'zero' back on the rifle. Most of them are instant converts to the big heavy tactical scopes, bases and rings after seeing the rifle(s) shoot to POA/POI subsequent to these 'killer' falls and whacks.

Your post is the first I've heard in many years concerning a POI shift due to a 'tap' on a quality scope. I'm not dis-believing you, I'm just a little confused as to how this happens.

Sign me up for your test program, another 'whack' or two isn't going to be noticable on my gear. I could even video the 'whacking' process and shot strings if you wish. Any opportunity to send a few more rounds down range is definately worth while.

Dave "Doc" King
 
 
 
 

Dave King <David_L_King@Yahoo.Com>
Damascus, MD, USA - Monday, July 09, 2001 at 11:40:24 (ZULU) (your host address: 131.158.166.157)


Ref: Tripods

Does anybody really take a camera tripod on a stalk?
I've got one all tricked out with the PVC saddle with padding etc. and it seems pretty bulky. I don't use a drag bag in the stalk but it would seem necessary if I were to "drag along" a tripod.

Ref: Case Neck Tension

How does a tight case to bullet fit effect velocity? (tighter=faster?)

Ref: Camelback Cleaning

I just bought a "bore brush" for my camelbak drinking tube. What I scrubbed out of that tube was nasty. Store your Camelback systems clean and dry all kinds of stuff will grow in there and it could make you pretty sick.

Ref: Natural Veg. & Ghillie Suits

Are there any tricks to attaching natural vegitation to the Ghillie Suit?

out
Kevin R. Mussack <kmussack@aol.com>
Clifton Springs, New York, USA - Monday, July 09, 2001 at 12:41:57 (ZULU) (your host address: 64.80.33.70)


HEY DOUG:

A question about the work GA Precision did to your 300 RUM. I have a 300WM I want to rebarrel and have the action worked on. How much did it run you to have them do the work for you? I pretty much need what you got minus the bedding job. Thanks.

Rob
Rob01 <customrem700@aol.com>
USA - Monday, July 09, 2001 at 14:22:40 (ZULU) (your host address: 209.22.212.106)


To All -

I am trying to find some private land by 1500 X 1000 for stalking excercise North of San Francisco or East of San Francisco. I want it far away from prying eyes. Any ideas and suggestion would be appreciated.

I am trying to put together a 2 day stalk class with Mike Miller.

Any questions, toss them my way. Thanks in advance

Darren...
Semper Fi
Darren <ddong@usmc.net>
San Francisco, CA, USA - Monday, July 09, 2001 at 14:26:07 (ZULU) (your host address: 207.211.20.29)


Gents,

Byron had asked me to post the results of my Winchester M70 .223 Stealth testing. Rifle is box stock, .223, 1/9" twist/26" barrel.

Load:
Winchester cases(new/match prep'd)
Federal 205 Match primer
24.6 gr. IMR-4895
Sierra 69 gr. Match King

Velocity: 2,949 FPS

This was a real surprise,as the Sierra Manual only lists 2,700 FPA from a 20" barrel. This should drop about 16 MOA at 600 yards. I'll test and let you know the results.

One prone 200 yard group was an amazing 5/8" for five rounds. All others were .5 MOA. I LIKE THIS RIFLE!

Semper Fi,

Wes
Not a mousegun shooter, but they are fun!
Wes Howe <wsaa@proaxis.com>
Blodgett, OR, USA - Monday, July 09, 2001 at 15:00:43 (ZULU) (your host address: 198.145.248.94)


To all on the 300 WSM;
Just my two cents worth but I think the 300 WSM will be the choice for the long range shooter someday but not right now as there are not any good short actions with the proper bolt face so this means that a Sako type extractor has to be installed. IMO this is a big mistake as the Sako extractor is prone to break and it cannot be installed in the proper place, it has to be installed above the bolt lug, and this can cause some ejection problems as the case is ejected high and it can hit the windage target knob on your scope and fall back into the action. DID I MENTION THEY BREAK!! I have seen a lot of them break so I don't install them.
Just my two cents worth.

Jerry
Jerry Rice <nor-cal@worldnet.att.net>
American Canyon, CA, USA - Monday, July 09, 2001 at 15:11:46 (ZULU) (your host address: 12.81.71.55)


Wes,

Since your not a mouse gun shooter and it will only do 1/2 moa at 200 I'll tell you what; I will take it off you hands and even pay the shipping!

In all seriousness sounds like you have a real keeper and don't change a thing. As soon as I can throw some together and get to a range I will let you know what they do from a 700P, in the interest of inquiring minds.

Thanks Again,
 

Byron <byburnham@earthlink.net>
CA, USA - Monday, July 09, 2001 at 15:13:00 (ZULU) (your host address: 24.41.73.254)


Jerry Rice,

Re: 300WSM, "there are not any good short actions with the proper bolt face". What is wrong with the Win M70 Classic SA that was pretty much designed for the WSM? I'm fully aware of the M700's long career with the military (and LE) but c'mon!
Mr. A ;-) <asimon@gj.net>
Not in the land of Stren, Big Red W, USA - Monday, July 09, 2001 at 15:57:40 (ZULU) (your host address: 216.169.65.173)


Posted by ironman0311 on Saturday, July 07, 2001 at 19:13:53 (ZULU) , from address: 205.188.192.39

Anyone else hear or have any more news on this?
 
 

The July 2001 issue of the Marine Corps Gazette reports that the USMC Snipers are testing a 6.5mm. 142gn Sierra in a WSM case @3186 fps. Rifle platforms are Armalite AR T-10 and Knights SR-25 w/24-26" bbls, also testing Lightforce Scopes with "Special Reticle".

This set-up delivers 408 more fpe @ 550 Mtrs. than AA 11 165 gn. Serria Sniper .308.
 

The 6.5 WSM stays supersonic beyond 1500yds.
 

When compared against bolt guns on hits on multiple (12x12) targets @ 550 yds, the AT 10/SR-25 the avg. shot/hit times were, on avg. 3-4 sec. as compared to 9-10 with the bolt guns. First shot hits were (in all winds) 93% for the 6.5 WSM, as compared to 80% for the 308. These tests were performed by experienced USMC, USA, and USN-SEAL Snipers alternating in relays with the their Bolt Guns then the test Semi-Autos.
 

(information as as related to me from a friend on the phone)
 
 
 
 
 
 

ironman0311 <ironman0311@hotmail.com>
USA - Monday, July 09, 2001 at 17:19:55 (ZULU) (your host address: 205.188.198.24)


Dave/Doc King, I also questioned the post on scopes shifting when tapped. I wished I could trace the address back and see if it came from BLank scope manufature.LOL I have never seen a Leupold or US Optics do that and if a scope did that it would not be able to be zero'd. The recoil is slightly more force than a finger tap! By the way you shoot a hell of alot better than most duty slotted snipers.

Sinister, the base you speak of is an old Nike Base. Out of serveice for many years now. A tourist attraction. Ranges are closed.

Guys asking to have bbls installed. Pay the cash and have the action trued in addition to the bbl screwed on. With the 300 Win make certain you know what chamber you are getting. If you are handloading have it cut long. If you are using factory loads have it cut for the bullet length you will shoot. Big difference between Federal factory Civilian 190 grains and what you can get out of either the Navy load or hand loads. The latter two are way longer and the velocity goes way up.

Darren thats in yards and no shooting required on the property other than blanks.

Undude/Mike
MikeMiller <Tactical@tacticalintervention.com>
Calif, USA - Monday, July 09, 2001 at 17:21:58 (ZULU) (your host address: 205.188.193.179)


CAMERA TRIPODS ON STALKS:

I never brought a camera tripod on a stalk because of the bulk and because its easier to skip that and use some sticks lashed together if need be and FFP permits.

I did use them when photographing the objective though if that was required. The pictures come out far better.

As far as neck tension, the only answer I have for that is a 12 pack of cold local beer and a girl named Maria Paula.

SERIOUS NOTE:

I am going to work on an article for the roster on information gathering for the sniper. If anyone wants to pitch in their two cents feel free and once my draft is finished, I can email it to those who might have something to add so we get the best quality product in the training section we can.

Best Rag guards,
 

Jefe
 

Jefe <diabloazul01@hotmail.com>
- Monday, July 09, 2001 at 18:07:24 (ZULU) (your host address: 200.30.103.130)


OOPS:

I meant that the sticks got cut before the FFP and were used in the FFP if the terrain worked for that. Not that you should cut the sticks and prepare them in the FFP.
 

Jefe <diabloazul01@hotmail.com>
- Monday, July 09, 2001 at 18:09:10 (ZULU) (your host address: 200.30.103.130)


Scope shifts: I have never had a scope shift from normal banging around whether high end or el cheap-o. Usually if there is a shift it's because the base or rings are loose, you have screwed with the turrets and they don't return to zero on el cheap-o or your using different or bad ammo. If there is a dramatic change in climate and you don't know how your cold bore shot is suppose to react could also explain the miss or spread. Check your log book. Usually it's operator headspace that pulls the shot. Log it with the cold bore info. and don't change a thing, then see how you group afterwards before you curse the scope.

6.5 WSM: All the 264 wildcats have potential. My favorite is my 6.5-06 out of a 21" Hart barrel. Gives me 1" groups at 300 yds with 142 MKs all day and it's easy on the shoulder and the budget. For 1500 yds I'd use a 338 Lapua. None of the standard 30 cal bullets come close to the BC of the 6.5's so 1500 is reasonible.

I sure hope the USMC has a big budget for barrels, 3200 fps is going to eat them like crazy.
TonyY <ayackowski@pershing.com>
Woodbridge, NJ, USA - Monday, July 09, 2001 at 18:16:43 (ZULU) (your host address: 32.97.88.102)


Re: Buying a custom rifle. I have dealt with a few of the custom gun makers out there these days. You will find a lot of gunsmiths running around wanting to build you a gun. With the quality of barrels, stocks, rings/mounts, scopes etc that these guys build with it takes SOME of the difficulty out of building a tack driver. So you will find a lot of "gunsmiths" hanging out signs.

I would say that the number one factor in selecting a custom smith is HIS reputation, not just his guns reputations. You buy a little piece of the gunsmith when you pick one if his guns. Not only are you going to be dealing with him on the initial purchase but also for repair work if anything goes awry. It doesn't take a real hard perusal of the archives to pick up on one M40 copier who is slower than shit and who is hard as hell to get a decent gun out of.

Pick one of the regulars on this site and you will be safe.

Out
 

Gooch <goochkw@riflemen.net>
USA - Monday, July 09, 2001 at 19:12:24 (ZULU) (your host address: 209.214.52.93)


Jerry, I will agree that the Sako is not the best extractor. Most of the ones I have wirtnessed breaking are the aftermarket types, The Factory Sako Extractors dont have as much failure. The New Sako 591 extractor is even better and is what I am using now for 338 Lapua and 300 WSM conversions. Narrower and lets the case escape without hitting the scope.

There are a few 40x recievers out there with short bolts with Magnum .540 bolt faces, as well as the older 350 rem mag 700's. Remington will have a 700 in the 300 WSM for 2002. this will solve the problem alltogether.

George Out
George Gardner, G.A. Precision <A10XRifle@aol.com>
Kansas City, MO, USA - Monday, July 09, 2001 at 19:41:06 (ZULU) (your host address: 205.188.200.44)


Does anybody really take a camera tripod on a stalk?<<<

I have before, but it depends on the AO. I normally get the most use out of tripods when doing urban ops and when doing concealments. It's mostly a school thing IMO, but it does have some usage IRL. Just one more club in the bag, so to speak.

USMC and 6.5mm/WSM. Interesting, this is the 1st I've heard about it. Last year at Perry they were talking about playing with the 6.5/284, and I think that's a better bet right now. 142's at 3200 sounds like a recipe for short barrel life, not to bag on that too much because I'd love to have one out in the woods. 21 minutes of elevation gets you from 100yds to 1000yds, and you need maybe 4 minutes of wind at 1000. Cool. I think the 7mm/WSM has more potential for longer barrel life and should be just a little better than the 7RemMag. Why does everyone ignore the 7mm? Wish Sierra would pull their heads out and copy the 180gn JLK. Plus I'd like to see a hardcore(tungsten or DU) round being tested because there's a lot of class III and (less often) class IV stuff out there these days. Think you're just going to make 1st round head shots at 600yds?
Think again. Semper Fidelis..Ken M
Ken M <target1371@aol.com>
IL, USA - Monday, July 09, 2001 at 19:43:22 (ZULU) (your host address: 24.4.253.164)


Mike Miller, I was the only guy I saw that mentioned rebarreling a 300 WM and of course I'm not going to just have a barrel screwed on. That would just be stupid and a waste of money. I was just wondering what GA Precision charged Doug for the services except for the bedding because my rifle's action is already bedded. I plan on having everything trued and a chambered appropriately. I've heard good things about GA Precision and was wondering how their prices were compared to others. I definately don't go to the lowest bidder when building or rebarreling a rifle. I go with the best work and parts that will get me the best accuracy possible. Your post was definately good advice for others that might be looking for cheap over quality but don't worry about me.

Semper Fi,
Rob
Rob01 <customrem700@aol.com>
USA - Monday, July 09, 2001 at 20:22:41 (ZULU) (your host address: 209.22.212.194)


Damm Rob, dont be so thinned skin. No insult meant. George will do a great job but you should ask him the price not someone on the DR. Call him at 816-221-1844. Also Jerry Rice builds a mean 300 Win call him at 707-552-3810. My Rice built 300 has turned in several 3 shot 1000 yard groups under four inches, under field conditions, with the Navy Load 190's from Black Hills. Your question was short but those types usually follow with the ones I answered so I was just trying to help. As Gooch said about rifles pick someone you like and can trust. Jerry and George are both upfront about how long and how much it will cost. They will both tell you how the weapon will shoot and they will both be right.

Wes, I will shoot either my Rice or Gardner built rifles against anything and that includes Chandlers.

Undude
MikeMiller <Tactical@tacticalintervention.com>
Calif, USA - Monday, July 09, 2001 at 20:54:38 (ZULU) (your host address: 64.12.103.21)


Two questions:

1. Is it true that most of the "rifle building" of the Chandler rifles is outsourced?

2. Is there really $5000+ worth of work that can go into a Remington based rifle?

Semper Fi

Paul <paulcockerham@att.net>
Reston, VA, USA - Monday, July 09, 2001 at 21:15:35 (ZULU) (your host address: 216.173.17.78)


No problem Mike. I'm not that thin skinned but I wanted to let you know not you didn't have to worry about me. I've talked to George through e-mails about another rifle that he's going to do some work on but haven't asked him about the 300WM yet. Doug just got his back so I figured he'd give me a ballpark and that's all I was wondering. I'll probably just drop George another e-mail. Thanks for the concern.

Rob
Rob01 <customrem700@aol.com>
USA - Monday, July 09, 2001 at 21:23:57 (ZULU) (your host address: 209.22.212.194)


Paul wrote;
"1. Is it true that most of the "rifle building" of the Chandler rifles is outsourced?"

Answer: Yes, some work is outsourced, I don't think that's a secret.

"2. Is there really $5000+ worth of work that can go into a Remington based rifle?"

Answer: Not in my opinion. However, just because a Rolex doesn't keep better time than a Casio doesn't mean there isn't value in a Rolex. The Chandler name has a great deal of prestige. Owning one of their rifles can be worth the extra money to some folks. That's ok, this is America after all.

I had a M40A1 built by a local guy nobody knows. It took seven months and cost $2,100. It shoots as well as a Rolex, er ah...I mean Chandler.

Again, just my opinion but if you have a M40A1 built to spec. by any competent riflesmith it will be the equal to any other except for the Gucci logo.

out
Kevin R. Mussack (Andy's Dad) <kmussack@aol.com>
Clifton Springs, New York, USA - Monday, July 09, 2001 at 21:56:21 (ZULU) (your host address: 152.163.204.54)


Leupold M3 LR illuminated, Part 3

I complained to Leupold Service representative that I did not like the fact they send the repaired scope back without the battery and that I had to buy a new one before I could not even test whether the scope now worked or not. They promised to send me a new one with sime other stuff.

Today, after a week of their reply I got the battery and a pretty stylish Leupold baseball cap.

So it took one week to fix the scope and another to fix the rest of their service. I think Leupold handled it pretty well and I am a happy customer.

So to give credit to where it is due, Leupold warranty service works very well.

Hexa
Hexa <juhola@luukku.com>
USA - Monday, July 09, 2001 at 23:33:26 (ZULU) (your host address: 38.31.119.78)


Camelbak/Eagle AIII-compatability question

I am planning to buy both a Camelbak Thermobak system and a Eagle Industries AIII-pack. Does the 100oz version of the Thermobak fit into the Eagle bags internal hydration systems compartment ? I believe the 70oz fits well but I am unsure whether the bigger one fits as well.

The idea is to purchase a system that works together and independently so all info is welcome. I would prefer the 100oz Thermobak because it is easier to have a lot of water than not to have enough of it.

Hexa
Hexa <juhola@luukku.com>
USA - Monday, July 09, 2001 at 23:37:23 (ZULU) (your host address: 38.31.119.78)


Rob
I can tell you it was under a $1000 for every thing.

Mike
Are the Black Hills 190's you speak of, the factory ammo they sell?

THANKS to every one that got me hooked up with George. Doug
Doug <dkb@pcpartner.net>
USA - Monday, July 09, 2001 at 23:38:28 (ZULU) (your host address: 199.120.66.111)


Gentlemen:

Some thoughts on the Chandler Sniper taken from my recent response to a discussion group thread at another site. I'm thankful we have many choices out there. For what it's worth, here's the background on my choice. I was considering offering an advance apology for this tome, but since I don't post that often, I'll consider this making up for lost time.

1. The Chandler Sniper is a mission-specific weapon. It is designed and built to be "grunt proof" (and beyond) while maintaining sub-MOA accuracy in extremely abusive, real-world field conditions. (Much better accuracy is possible in the hands of a well-trained shooter.) The Chandler has been dropped hard from several feet off the ground, knocked against trees, scope-banged and abused in other ways without loss of zero and accuracy. It will do this month after month and continue to perform out to a thousand without a hitch. Personally, I find that to be a confidence builder. For the LE sniper or other professional? I would say that benefit is priceless.

2. Having said everything in #1 above, what about the price? Outrageous? For the person who wants a rifle that is guaranteed to do all of the above and more, not really. Of course, my opinion may be discounted as hopelessly biased becaues I'm a Chandler owner, but hear me out. Building a Chandler with the above described features/capabilities is very labor intensive. You pay for that labor. The builders are carefully selected former Marine armorers who are very good at building ONE TYPE OF RIFLE.

3. To re-emphasize: the Chandler is a special-use weapon build to exceed commonly accepted specifications, including those of the Marine Corps as they apply to a sniper weapon system. It is NOT a benchrest rifle, hunting rifle or "everyday" tactical rifle. I say that because part of the problem "out there" is that anyone with the desire and some skill can put together a match barrel, custom stock, mil-dot scope and custom-bed action and call it/sell it as a "tactical rifle" or "sniper rifle." The difference in cost, value and performance lies in the design, function and purpose for which a rifle is built, not simply the action upon which it is based or other common feature.

4. Finally, why do I own a Chandler? Even though I'm not a military/law enforcement professional, I enjoy owning and shooting a rifle that is of exceptional quality and considered by many in the shooting law enforcement and military professions to be the best OF ITS KIND. Pride of ownership certainly is part of the equation. There are other outstanding rifles out there; many cost less, a few cost in the same ball park. Do you need to spend $5,000 for a quality rifle? No. Is it reasonable to spend that much on what I've described? Obviously I believe so. Again, the difference is design, labor investment and purpose/use. I don't believe there are many builders out there who possess the extensive knowledge and skill required to build a rifle that stands apart. I could have bought one of several other tactical rifles for $2,000-$2,500, give or take some. But as a student of military history and with an eye for the unique and exceptional, I chose a Chandler. Whatever your decision, do your research, talk to a lot of people and maintain an open mind and desire to learn. Having done that, chances are your final decision will be much more gratifying.
Tim Crabb <tbcrabb@knology.net>
Columbus, GA, USA - Monday, July 09, 2001 at 23:59:08 (ZULU) (your host address: 24.214.37.144)


Tim,

Before I post this I would like to say that this is not meant as a flame and that I do not own a custom built rifle (yet). In response to points 1 & 2 of your post:

1. The Chandler Sniper is a mission-specific weapon. It is designed and built to be "grunt proof" (and beyond) while maintaining sub-MOA accuracy in extremely abusive, real-world field conditions. (Much better accuracy is possible in the hands of a well-trained shooter.) The Chandler has been dropped hard from several feet off the ground, knocked against trees, scope-banged and abused in other ways without loss of zero and accuracy. It will do this month after month and continue to perform out to a thousand without a hitch. Personally, I find that to be a confidence builder. For the LE sniper or other professional? I would say that benefit is priceless.

The implication here is that Chandler is the only rifle builder that has the knowledge, material and capability to produce such a weapon. I agree that a weapon capable of this level of performance when ones life is on the line is priceless, however I do not believe that this confidence should lie within the name.
 

2. Having said everything in #1 above, what about the price? Outrageous? For the person who wants a rifle that is guaranteed to do all of the above and more, not really. Of course, my opinion may be discounted as hopelessly biased becaues I'm a Chandler owner, but hear me out. Building a Chandler with the above described features/capabilities is very labor intensive. You pay for that labor. The builders are carefully selected former Marine armorers who are very good at building ONE TYPE OF RIFLE.

I agree that this process is very labor intensive and that the labor commands a certain price, but again the implication is that Chandler's time is worth more than that of other builder of equal quality rifles. This said, go back to the outsourcing issue. What about the rifle builder that builds a rifle of equal quality and invests his own blood, sweat and tears in every aspect of the project from beginning to end?

I am not saying that one rifle is better than another, but if you have $5,000 to spend on a rifle and can get a rifle of equal quality for ..lets say...$2,500, wouldn't you rather do this and then use the other $2,500 for ammo?

Semper Fi
 
 
 
 

Paul <paulcockerham@att.net>
Reston, VA, USA - Tuesday, July 10, 2001 at 00:56:01 (ZULU) (your host address: 12.91.132.221)


$5000 riffles???

There is no "magic formula" to a fine tactical rifle, and no "lock" on the ability to build them... and there are many super 'smiths that will build an M40, or one of the varients, that is cosmetically, and machanically equal to chandler's gun.

If you want a "Name Brand" for statis reasons, then go for it, and enjoy the hell out of it... but don't for a minute, think your stick is somehow superior to someone else's...
... fine barrels, action preping, bedding, and a "kewl paint job" are not secret, black magic, arts.

You can even be the sub-contractor of your own M40, have each aspect of the gun done by the best in the business (as chandler does) AT THAT PART or the process...
... and do it as well, and it will look as "Kewl", shoot as well, and be as "grunt proof" as chandler's guns... and you will have $2,500 to $3,000 left over to play with.
 

"X" <condor@mags.net>
USA - Tuesday, July 10, 2001 at 01:51:47 (ZULU) (your host address: 208.249.180.95)


Hogs $5K Rifle:
Regardless of whose riffle you end up with, you need a tactical intervention sling and a mildot master to go with it so...

GO AHEAD AND TAKE A SHOT AT ANOTHER SLING AND MILDOT MASTER.

WHEN: NOW
HOW LONG: ......UNKNOWN
WHAT TO DO: SEND AN EMAIL TO: freebee20010709@aspiringtech.net

Same as before....
 

Getting the family unpacked....

Ken :)

Ken Hunter <freebee20010709@aspiringtech.net>
Nokesville, Va, USA - Tuesday, July 10, 2001 at 03:13:03 (ZULU) (your host address: 207.233.164.10)


Guys - I am finally going to get that new Knee installed tomorrw so I will be out of touch for about a week or so. I can't say that $5000 is to much for a rifle when this Titanium/plastic joint they are putting in alone cost $8000. Thought it would be easier to post here than send out all those Emails.

Ken - please enter me in any free drawings for the next week or so, I am expecting my new Autuaga rifle from Rusty in a couple of weeks and it will need a sling. Can one ever have too many mildot masters?

Take care
Titan <hatherly1@home.com>
USA - Tuesday, July 10, 2001 at 03:26:22 (ZULU) (your host address: 24.182.48.47)


Darren & Mike.... Oregon is north of San Fran.... come on up!!!

Tim
Gizmo <ssn581@teleport.com>
Beavercreek, OR, USA - Tuesday, July 10, 2001 at 05:05:20 (ZULU) (your host address: 216.26.60.64)


Ref: Range Safety

Last night Andy and I packed up and went to our range to ring some steel after dinner. We had walked back to the 250 yard position and set our stuff down. When we looked back at our targets there was someone walking along the top of the berm behind the targets. We picked up our stuff and went back to the target line. The fellow was one of the many Mexican field hands that work in the area and he was fishing in the pond behind the berm. I told Andy that this was probably the fellow's sole relaxation after a long day in the fields and that we could always shoot another time so we quietly left.
In the future we will be posting a "sandwich board" sign in the laneway leading to the pond with a Warning and a keep out message. We will also be installing our range flag at the end of the laneway.
We are willing to share "our spot" but have to be so careful. This was a reminder to always do a detailed search down range every time before shooting. Shooting is a lot of fun but we've always got to remain diligent because one accident or even a close call would ruin it forever.
Be careful out there guys.

out
Kevin R. Mussack (Andy's Dad) <kmussack@aol.com>
Clifton Springs, New York, USA - Tuesday, July 10, 2001 at 12:11:50 (ZULU) (your host address: 64.80.33.70)


Tim..
Not to slam you or your rifle but paying that kindof money for a rifle to me would be foolish. I think to many people get cought up in all of this "Hype" on the mistical "Sniper Rifle". I have had a bunch of custom rifles built for a third of that. I shoot in tactical matches and some have been real ball busters but I have never had a problem with any of my rifles. (Other than the barrels get shot out)

I don't even use the heavy rings and bases that many do. I use the Leupold duel dovetail mounts and rings and have never had any problems. I don't swap scopes around that often so I have no need for a quick detatch feature, more money in my pocket for ammo.

The only thing that you would have that I don't that may break on mine would be the heavy steel trigger guard and I could put one on for a couple of hundred dollars. (If I was worried about it)

The abuse you talk about would damage the scope more than the rifle. I have always felt the scope is the weak link in the tactical rilfe system. Unless you have the add on metal sights you still have a $5000.00 stick if the scope gets broke. I, on the other hand, only have a $1500 one.

I won't argue that Chandler doesn't build a great rifle but is it better than any of mine?? If I put a steel trigger guard on mine I would put it up against yours anyday in all of your tests. My 308 with the Pac Nor barrel will shoot .25 groups with a target scope and probably better with a better shooter. But then I don't use a target scope I use the LR for tactical shooting so I am back to around a .5 group but thats still better than it needs to be.

I will close by saying that I was hunting coyotes 2 years ago and took a nasty fall on frozen ground and went head first into the ground on top of my rifle, it hit on the scope (a 3.5x10LR) hard enough to ruin the elevation knob and it was only off about 6" to the left when I fired it for zero. I think that says a lot for the rings and bases when 200lbs slams it into the frozen ground and it still holds a close zero. Just my opinon and you know what they say about those.
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Tuesday, July 10, 2001 at 13:32:34 (ZULU) (your host address: 207.41.18.3)


I have a question of rifle stocks.

I am aware that the McMillan standards are the M40A1-A4, but does anyone have any experience with the McHale stock? What are the opinions of the use of this stock on a tactical rifle? Thanks.

Semper Fi

Paul <paulcockerham@att.net>
Reston, VA, USA - Tuesday, July 10, 2001 at 13:36:41 (ZULU) (your host address: 216.173.17.78)


Mike Miller-- The John Jardine you mentioned in your article in SOF on the Valtro 1911, does he have anything to do with the Jard trigger for the AR15? Have been asking about for feedback on these. I recently installed one for a guy and it seemed like a reasonably-priced, decent outfit. Maybe not as highly finished as the Jewell, but different mechanically anyway (single-stage), and $70 less. Have not had any news from the customer on it yet other than the initial positive impression of the trigger pull it gave.

I saw the Valtro at the last two SHOT shows and was also very impressed. Glad to see they are finally available.

Thanks
Ned
www.m-guns.com
Ned <metalmaster@m-guns.com>
3R, MI, USA - Tuesday, July 10, 2001 at 13:51:30 (ZULU) (your host address: 207.89.137.5)


Titan, sorry to hear about the knee. Good luck my friend. Hope you heal well. From many knee surgeries with the screws and pins I can say it is going to hurt like hell. This is truly a time for drugs and TV. Rest up get better and we will see you next year.

On the McHale stoick. I had one on a Remington 700 SA and liked it. Similar feel to the HS Stock.

On Chandler rifles. I have seen the work it is outstanding but the cost does not seem to be justified, to me. Using a Rolex for comparison will not work. The Chandler starts out as a Remington just like all the others. It uses the same parts as the others and is put together in the same fashion with the same techniques and equipment by people trained at the same place, capable of the same quality, so why does it cost more? Because people will pay it. They are without a doubt a great rifle but no better than a Rice or Gardner, or several others, built weapon and cost twice as much. This is not to flame Chandler they are doing fine with huge back log of weapons to be made. By the way the Rolex costs 1.5 times what a Omega does and the Omega is a better watch. I own an Omega Semper Fi

Undude
MikeMiller <tactical@tacticalintervention.com>
Calif, USA - Tuesday, July 10, 2001 at 14:03:15 (ZULU) (your host address: 205.188.197.37)


Gents,

Only about half my posts are being accepted by the list. The other half indicated "you are not set up to post". Anyone else experiencing this frustrating phenomena?

On Chandler Rifles...I love mine. Was it worth it? I think so, which in the final analysis is what really counts. Half the fun was working with Norm Jr. as the project progressed.

I'm sure that George and Jerry build fine rifles and one is in my future, I'm sure. For tactical rifles, I have my Chandler Gun, My M40A1 clone...nicely done by a local hi-power gunsmith, and my Geoff Corn M25. I'm pleased with all of them.

Other projects...I'm building a high grade .284 Winchester on a custom Mexican Mauser. Metal work and Krieger barrel, Blackburn bottom metal and trigger. English walnut stock that I'm stocking myself. I'll have about $2K in the whole thing. If I had a name stockmaker do it I'd have been looking at $5K because of the labor intensive stocking and checkering process. Worth it? Again, only you can decide. My firearms are "special" and add to the experience and joy of the hunt...well worth it!

Semper Fi,

Wes
Wes Howe <wsaa@proaxis.com>
Blodgett, OR, USA - Tuesday, July 10, 2001 at 14:25:00 (ZULU) (your host address: 198.145.248.126)


INFO GATHERING ARTICLE:

Last chance for anyone who wants to look it over and pitch in their two cents before I send it to Marius.

Thanks to Kevin for contributing and I encourage folks to pitch in so we get a better product on the board.

Besides, I dont know how to "uze spellchek."
 

Jefe <diabloazul01@hotmail.com>
- Tuesday, July 10, 2001 at 14:29:48 (ZULU) (your host address: 200.30.103.130)


MacHale Stocks: I have them on two tactical rifles that I had built. They are lighter than the A* series stocks and give a feeling similiar to the HS PSS stocks as Mike stated. One reason I like the McHale is that it can be fitted for any action, I have mine on a Weatherby 30/378 MKV action and one on a Browning Euro long action. Also they accept forearm rails and can be built with adjustable cheek pieces and Butt plates. They are as good as any of the other McMillan tactical stocks. It's just a matter of the shooter's preference.
TonyY <ayackowski@pershing.com>
Woodbridge, NJ, USA - Tuesday, July 10, 2001 at 14:33:46 (ZULU) (your host address: 32.97.88.102)
Tony..
Hows the 6.5-06 doing??? Have you had a chance to wring it out yet?? Have you cronographed any loads with it yet??
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Tuesday, July 10, 2001 at 16:08:28 (ZULU) (your host address: 207.41.18.3)
$5k rifles ?

I think what we are seeing is the same thing that happened first with custom M1911s and with MP5s after 1986. Too many buyers willing to pay top dollar for a scarce resource. Additionally if you calculate into the picture LE agencies that have lots of confiscated narco dollars that can ONLY be used for equipment purchases and you end up with $5k rifles with FACTORY Remington 700 receivers.

If you think about: If there were no buyers for $5k rifles, there would be no manufacturers for them. The buyer is the reason for these prices, not the manufacturers.

Also some people just have to have the TOP-DOLLAR tool because they want to buy their way above the rest of the group with their TOYS. What I mean is that it is often (not allways) the same phenomen as with cars. People buy Corvettes just to be able to show off their friends they "made it". Some tactical shooters buy the most expensive toys, not because they need it, but because they can AFFORD it. I have even heard that some people buy Chandler rifles as an investment. I think that is really stupid, but then again some people buy Porsches for the same reasons. Both are manufactured and designed to be used HARD. Anything else is stupid.

Chandler rifles are definately good rifles but I do not really think they are worth the extra expense above what a decent Jerry Rice or Gardner rifle costs.
Hexa <juhola@luukku.com>
USA - Tuesday, July 10, 2001 at 16:09:52 (ZULU) (your host address: 64.58.22.7)


Dudes, dudes, dudes....

On the subject of custom guns v "off the shelf" ones.

When you get a custom gun you are getting:

1. A guarantee of accuracy.
2. Someone to cry too when the gun doesn't shoot like you think it should.
3. A gun built to your specs.

When you buy an off the shelf you get:

1. No guarantee of accuracy.
2. A 20 year old sales clerk at the Wal-Mart or if you are lucky a saleman at a gun store who will look at you crazy when you complain that your Savage 110 won't hold 1 moa.
3. A base of which to spend money on to get where you want to be ( a reciever on which to put on a new trigger, barrel, stock, etc).

Bottom line is if you have the money to buy a custom gun then get one. If you can't afford it then buy a VS and a shit load of ammo.

Out
Gooch <goochkw@riflemen.net>
USA - Tuesday, July 10, 2001 at 16:38:51 (ZULU) (your host address: 209.214.53.26)


Custom Guns: You have to love them. If you have the time shop around for an old action. Older steel was better than todays. Rem 700, Sako, Win pre-64, etc.. Estate sales and some gun shows are great for these buys. Make sure the action is in decent shape. Some times you can pick up and old 700 ADL or BDL for next to nothing $50 - $100 or whatever. Have someone like Hart, Krieger, Douglas, Shilen or whoever your choice is do a barrel fitting, truing, squaring, lapping, bead blasting etc. Shop around for a stock (Eporium is good for this) and a bargan on a jewel trigger. Have a compedent smith inlet and bed the stock and install and adjust the trigger. Now if you don't go for the extras like fluting, brakes, rails, adjustable stocks, cyro, silicone, etc., you have just built a tack driver for around $1k to 1.2k. All you need to do is go to Walley World and pick up some flat paints for a camo job. Mounts, rings and scope are your choice. They will probably add about another $1200 to the price. Total around 2 - 2.5k and you have something that makes you feel like you put it together yourself.

Pat the 6.5-06 is great. I've only had the chance to shoot to 350 yards lately but I'm getting about 1 - 1.25 inch 5 shot groups at 300 yds out of that Hart 21" heavy fluted barrel. This rifle seems to like 142 MK's, with 49.1 gr IMR 4350, Fed210M primers and I've been using Rem 25-06 nickel cases necked up (got a good deal on a 1000, not really a big Rem case fan). I put a US Optics 10x SN6 on it with their rings and base that was built for the action. I estimated about 2750 - 2800 fps out of the short barrel but I believe it's closer to 2900 based on the MOA adjustments from 100 - 300 yds. Appears to need about .75 MOA less than generated by my computer so it must be a little faster. The whole package with a McHale fully adjustible stock and scope weighs in at about 11 1/2 lbs. I might leave the 300 WM home and take this one to the Sniper Paradise match down in Texas come this Oct. It's got a nice balance to it.
TonyY <ayackowski@pershing.com>
Woodbridge, NJ, USA - Tuesday, July 10, 2001 at 17:59:40 (ZULU) (your host address: 32.97.88.102)


$5k Rifles:
I have to agree with Gooch. If you can afford a custom gun go for it! Just do some shopping and be sure the 'smith you pick will do you right. I may be a Staff member of SC but I don't own a custom gun - haven't been able to afford one! I started with a Savage 110 FP with a Tasco SS10x42 and standard Leupold mounts. Nothing fancy but it shot better than I could then, and at the time - for all you REAL OLDTIME Rosterfarians - I really got razzed about it! Eventually found a 700VS at a Pawn Shop that was in near new condition. Up-grades include a D.D.Ross rail, Badger Rings and a Leupold 3.5x10 M3LR. Does it shot any better than the Savage because its a Remington - probably not - with the exception of the stock and trigger of course! Does it make me shoot any better NO WAY! BUT do I like it better than the Savage - YES and not only because I don't get razzed as much but I have, again as Gooch said, the base for a custom gun from George or Jerry one of these days! Buy what you can afford, up-grade as you can and SHOOT, SHOOT, SHOOT that's how you get good at this. Yes the weaponary helps but if you pay $5K and can't afford to buy ammo what good is it!! :-)

Sarge
 

Sarge <garryrn@zianet.com>
Southern Area 51, NM, USA - Tuesday, July 10, 2001 at 19:58:38 (ZULU) (your host address: 216.243.125.148)


Wes,

Only some posts accepted? FUNNY! You sure your capitalisation is what it should be? Remember that Ken wrote that part of the script to be case sensitive. Thus {wsaa@proaxis.com} is NOT the same as {Wsaa@proaxis.com}. Ditto with the password. That is the only thing I can think of. Ken, you have any other thoughts?

Jefe,
Don't waste any time, do you! I just luv that. Don't worry about the "uze spellchek" - Roger's got nothing to do in any case! :-)

Roger, hope you're reading this and seeing something else is coming your way shortly, apart from those two I just sent ya!

Marius
Marius <webmaster@snipercountry.com>
RSA - Tuesday, July 10, 2001 at 20:12:51 (ZULU) (your host address: 155.239.180.28)


Gooch I don't think they are complaining about buying custom insted of an off the shelf but more so the extra cost, about $5K, as opposed to a custom Rice Or Gardner rifle that is built as well for about $1875. Obviously you know Mike Lau because your names in the credits of his book and his rifles are supposed to be some of the best M40A1 clones and they run at about $2K.

Personally I have put my rifle together over the years, from a VS, and it's run me under $2K. I have a McMillan A-2 stock bedded by McMillan, all the custom work done on the action by Jeff Hicks formally of Answer Products, a SS Lothar Walther barrel, a Remington trigger adjusted to a crisp and clean 2.5lbs and a steel trigger guard. The rifle shoots consistant .25 5 shot groups at 100 yards. I had to do it this way because of lack of funds but if I was going to just go buy a custom I would go with a Gardner or Rice. I can't see spending that much on a Chandler. Actually my friend Steve is in this position now and we were looking for a good custom 300WM for him. He looked at the Chandlers and almost fell off his seat. He's going to be going with George Gardner when his funds come around.

Now onto a new question. I have a friend, actually the above mentioned Steve, that's into reenactments for WWII. He would like to reload blanks for his 30-06 Garand. Anyone know where to get blank dies or if there's any trick? Also he's going to reload shotgun blanks, any help there would be appreciated. Thanks.

Rob

Rob01 <customrem700@aol.com>
USA - Tuesday, July 10, 2001 at 20:19:52 (ZULU) (your host address: 205.188.199.173)


Rosterfarians,

I need some input - good, bad or indifferent. Take a look at peteR's Rem700 update article. I'm playing a bit with style sheets and seeing if I can:
 

When you mail me your comments (rather in my mail than here, since it is not quite relevant to discussions - I'll post the consolidated replies if you guys want), please tell me:

Thanks for the help.

Marius
Marius <webmaster@snipercountry.com>
RSA - Tuesday, July 10, 2001 at 20:22:40 (ZULU) (your host address: 155.239.180.28)


Marius,

I've been monitoring the situation over the last few days, so I've seen it coming. Got the two you just sent. Will start on them tonight.

Keep the articles coming, fellas!
Roger C. <madeditor75@hotmail.com>
Austin, TX, USA - Tuesday, July 10, 2001 at 20:29:06 (ZULU) (your host address: 24.160.1.81)


Guys,

Anybody got a pet load for an AR15 with a shorty upper? I think it should hold 2 moa at 300yds. Barrel is a 1/9 Bushmaster. Bought some Sierra 69gr match, Hornady 52gr match, and Hornady VMax60gr ballistic tip. Powder on hand is Hogdon BLC-2, Varget, Vitta Vori N140, Win748, and IMR4895.
Gonna use it for 3 Gun Matches. Max distance is under 300yds. Targets are steel gongs about 10" in diameter.
I tried my DCM load in it, but no luck. The 75gr bullets are just too heavy for the 1/9 shorty ak upper.
55gr ball is real good up close, but at 300yds it is not working all that good. I can't use SS109 at the matches. Too bad, it works pretty good.

Would I spend the money for a custom Tactical Rifle? Sure. It beats spending money on a cheap rifle to make it shoot like a good custom rifle. Spend the bucks one time on the rifle, and then you don't have worry about what to buy next.
 

Later,
Bill B <dc8plumber@aol.com>
Out Back , KY, USA - Tuesday, July 10, 2001 at 20:29:50 (ZULU) (your host address: 64.12.106.33)


Rob,

You are correct. There has been no discussion whatsoever about buying an "off the shelf" rifle versus a custom.

Bill B.,

If the SS109 works, just pull the bullet and replace it with something comparable that is legal. I know a few guys that shoot service rifle that like to shoot M852. They pull the bullets remove .5gr of powder and reseat the bullet. They say that this is more accurate than anything they can reload.

Semper Fi
 
 

Paul <paulcockerham@att.net>
Reston, VA, USA - Tuesday, July 10, 2001 at 20:47:29 (ZULU) (your host address: 216.173.17.78)


My question is in regards to the night vision mount found atop the front scope ring. (looks like a mini picatinni rail that replaces the top half of the ring) Who builds them and where do you get them? I have seen several pictures of these and wouldn't mind having one just for kicks. If you have any info, please email me, I would love to hear about them.

thanks
Shooter <biggun762@hotmail.com>
bean, town, USA - Tuesday, July 10, 2001 at 21:00:40 (ZULU) (your host address: 167.234.101.150)


Shooter-
I believe you are referring to the Simrad mount. It is meant for the NVD to interface with the day scope. Costs about $10,000. (ouch!)
You may be able to call a Simrad distributor up and buy the front ring, but it will have to matched to the same height rear ring.
Mike T <Riflemike@home.com>
USA - Tuesday, July 10, 2001 at 23:27:05 (ZULU) (your host address: 65.11.197.193)
Hey Gang,

Just a note to thank you for keeping Ken out of trouble while I was off eating sushi. The Rock was actually fun, got my scuba certification thanks to Gunny Legowski, spent New Year's in Ropungi and got to Korea for a shopping trip ( any one need a mink blanket?)

I'm back now and hope to get out to some of the matches.

Domo Arigato gozaimasu

Kim
Kim Hunter (The Major) <kim@hunters.org>
Nokesville, Va, USA - Wednesday, July 11, 2001 at 01:21:15 (ZULU) (your host address: 207.233.164.10)


Hogs - freebee....

Okay gang ---- we have a winner here... number 23 was picked (by the Major) .... Number 23 points to Kevin Mussack's entry...

Congratulations Kevin!...

Kevin... please forward your shipping info to me - I will notify the respective vendors:

Mildot Enterprises (Bruce Robinson) http://www.mildot.com

Tactical Intervention Specialists (Mike Miller) http://www.tacticalintervention.com

thanks all!

Ken :)

Ken Hunter <hunterkr@riflemen.net>
Nokesville, Va, USA - Wednesday, July 11, 2001 at 01:34:12 (ZULU) (your host address: 207.233.164.10)


Gent's,
what is the / which is the best of these two models, and why?.
The TRG 41's, or the 42's???.Caliber either .300 or .338.
Any info appreciated.

Two Shoes

Dos Zapatos
Terry <tls8323@cs.com>
USA - Wednesday, July 11, 2001 at 01:55:10 (ZULU) (your host address: 205.188.198.163)


Gents,

If we are all done "pissing in each others oatmeal" over this custom rifle thing can we move on...? Oh, let's add factory rifles to the list, too.

Let's face it, 99% of us could live with the straight factory 700 PSS or Winch 70 Stealth. Good Luppie mounts and scopes complete the vision.

Very few of us need a "hardened" rifle. Most are stuck with what is issued and will live with it. The police marksman certainly can.

Marines and other services have other mission requirements, that cops don't generally have, making the equipment requirements different. Still, I'll bet the PSS/Stealth package would work for most applications.

We all fantasize about the 1000 yard shot, but in reality is it's rare, and even in the event of a superb marksman the shot requires a bit of luck. We are getting entirely to wrapped up in "what if's" rather than reality.

Still, the beauty is that we have choices. Something most cops and service members don't have...consider yourself to be lucky that you are better armed than most and live in a country where you can still exercise that choice...

Hey! How about that Babylonian tuperware!

Semper Fi,

Wes
P.S. Who's still wearing his Seiko Divers watch...
Wes Howe <wsaa@proaxis.com>
Blodgett, OR, USA - Wednesday, July 11, 2001 at 02:21:42 (ZULU) (your host address: 198.145.248.46)


I have to agree with the banter on the custom Rifles

I bought an early model PSS, After a few years, I had Tac-Ord customize it and got fitted with new glass. Hence the damn near $5k rifle. The cost is well justified. Tac-ord, Jerry Rice, and others will make you whatever you want, however outlandish. Save the duckey-bones and get a custom gun.

In the Quantico Va Area, any good places to shoot? Ken H., I think I asked you this before, too many malt inflicted braincell deaths, I forgot what you mentioned.

Thanks and Semper Fi

Lieuten-a-date Kushnir
Kush <matchking175@hotmail.com>
The Big Suck, Quantico, Va., USA - Wednesday, July 11, 2001 at 02:23:51 (ZULU) (your host address: 63.25.85.1)


Wes,

What's wrong with Seiko divers watches?

Kush
Kush <matchking175@hotmail.com>
Q-town, Va, USA - Wednesday, July 11, 2001 at 02:25:53 (ZULU) (your host address: 63.25.85.1)


Gent's...

Questions night for me.........sorry
Went through this months Roster, and either am missing it, or it's somewhere else.
Someone, posted about a spotting scope that was supposed to be the cat's meeow...
It was a different brand than I had ever heard of or seen.....
If someone remembers that scope, and what the name is, and or where to get them, pls hit me offline.
Gray matter challenged tonight.
Thanks

Two Shoes
Dos Zapatos
Terry <tls8323@cs.com>
USA - Wednesday, July 11, 2001 at 03:14:58 (ZULU) (your host address: 64.12.105.179)


Can somebody direct me a photo of a Simrad KN-250 mount, and also give direction as to where to find one. I head that Badger makes one, but on their web page it is listed as a set of 1" rings. I have a set of 30mm Badgers and am just interested in the rail that fits atop the front sight. If anybody can be of help on this one, I would surely appreciate it. If there are other manufacturers out there that produce this same piece of equipment, please forward that along also, I love my badger rings and bases, but $250 to have a night vision mount, just for kicks, is a bit much.

Thanks for any input.
Gunny <biggun762@hotmail.com>
bean, town, USA - Wednesday, July 11, 2001 at 04:13:31 (ZULU) (your host address: 4.54.76.172)


I just wanted to thank everyone for all the fantastic feedback and e-mails that you have sent me on custom riflesmiths. I'm really looking forward to getting this custom rifle project rolling. I'm indebted to all of you for your generosity and experience in these matters. Best wishes,

Dustin
Dustin <dustinsmart@hotmail.com>
College Station, TX, USA - Wednesday, July 11, 2001 at 05:37:37 (ZULU) (your host address: 129.109.166.146)


AT EASY gentlemen (and I use that term VERY loosely) MAJ KIM is back and will be in the AO for a while we hope!!
Beleive it or not WE DID MISS YOU!
Welcome Back!

Sarge
 

Sarge <garryrn@zianet.com>
Southern Area 51, NM, USA - Wednesday, July 11, 2001 at 06:03:50 (ZULU) (your host address: 216.243.125.67)


Rob01 {customrem700@aol.com}

Just saw your post asking about 30-06 blank dies. If you read my post following yours you'll see a link to peteR's article where he discusses getting dies from loading his own blanks. C-H4 or something like that - can't remember and too lazy to look.

Or just click here and go read it.

Marius
 

Marius <webmaster@snipercountry.com>
RSA - Wednesday, July 11, 2001 at 06:12:16 (ZULU) (your host address: 196.25.27.66)


Andy and I went out and layed in the dirt last night after supper. It was a beautiful evening for shooting, cool, no wind and good light. Then I won some stuff on the raffel here. Life is good.

Time for PT.....

out
Kevin R. Mussack (Andy's Dad) <kmussack@aol.com>
Clifton Springs, New York, USA - Wednesday, July 11, 2001 at 08:37:13 (ZULU) (your host address: 205.188.199.168)


Major Kim!!!

Welcome Home!

I have heard a REALLY good .22 Rimfire range opened somewhere in the Nokesville,VA. Have you heard about it??????????
 

OOOOOPs! ;-)
 

Ducking from HEAVY incoming fire, in no rain today
peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
Big City, By-Gawd, USA - Wednesday, July 11, 2001 at 10:09:10 (ZULU) (your host address: 64.12.102.32)


Custom vs. off the shelf: I have an AR-15 that I figure I have invested $850-$900 in. I shoot next to a lot of guys that have $2500 that I know of in theirs. The holes in the target don't give a rip how much the bullet launching platform cost. $5000 seems a bit steep for a rifle when there are ways to get to the same destination for less. A merely decent rifle, with a dedicated and proficient shooter behind it, is deadlier than a dilittante with an expensive toy. give him a couple of fam rounds with a Savage .308, and you could kiss my derrier before I'd face Tubbs with the best rifle you could give me. It's usually the shooter that needs the work. As for blank ammo, click on my address and I'll put you in touch with re-enactors that burn thousands of rounds of the stuff. (where's the fun in that? no matter HOW much you shoot, you never hit anything. They won't let me play.)
Charles S. Hunt <dpms223@aol.com>
San Antonio, Texas, USA - Wednesday, July 11, 2001 at 13:49:07 (ZULU) (your host address: 152.163.194.189)
Question on Movers:

Assuming speed of target remains constant and we are NOT factoring for any wind.

If my lead on the target is 2" at 100 yds, does the lead remain the same at 600 yds or is this an MOA angle that becomes 12" at 600 yds. Also do we need to add anything for Time of Flight at 600 yds. I usually just SWAG it on this and hope for the hit.
TonyY <ayackowski@pershing.com>
Woodbridge, NJ, USA - Wednesday, July 11, 2001 at 15:01:01 (ZULU) (your host address: 32.97.88.102)


Tony

It's all about time-of-flight and target speed (leaving the wind factor out of the equation). (Target speed in FPS) * 12 * time of flight (in seconds) = lead value (in inches).

1 MPH = 1.466 Feet per second or 17.592 Inches per second
 
 
 
 
 

Dave King <David_L_King@Yahoo.Com>
Damascus, MD, USA - Wednesday, July 11, 2001 at 15:20:36 (ZULU) (your host address: 131.158.166.157)


Tony

Lead also depends on whether or not you're going to shoot leading edge or center mass. To shoot leading edge you'll need to subtract the desired depth into the target from the calculated lead.

For example:

A 3 mph mover is going about 4.4 FPS (52.8 inches)
A 168 30 caliber bullet @ 2650 fps will take about .25 second to get to 200 yards.
Lead would be about 13 inches.

To shoot center mass you lead the desired POI by 13 inches.

To shoot leading edge you need to subtract the distance from the leading edge to the desired POI within the target or you'll be shooting his buttons off. For a 12 inch thick target area I'd subtract 6 inches from the lead to get a final lead value of 7 inches.

I think I have this correct, someone straighten me out if I'm wrong.
 
 
 
 

Dave King <David_L_King@Yahoo.Com>
Damascus, MD, USA - Wednesday, July 11, 2001 at 15:37:08 (ZULU) (your host address: 131.158.166.157)


Doc thanks for the formula.. Always figured there was a formula but never really gave it a thought since I don't really shoot movers that often. I should check my log book.
 

TonyY <ayackowski@pershing.com>
Woodbridge, NJ, USA - Wednesday, July 11, 2001 at 15:40:32 (ZULU) (your host address: 32.97.88.102)


Been checking the Roster for a couple of years now but this is my first post.

Main reason I'm posting is because I wanted to include a world class custom smith that gets little or no mention here. Terry Cross at KMW should not be left out of your short list of possible builders.

He is the same guy that designed and sells the Pod-Loc seen else where on this site but his main business is custom bolt gun work. The first work I saw from him was on a U.S.Marshals S.O.G. Department rifle. It was a Rem 40X .308 that had been stocked, barreled and hardened. The detail work on the rifle was outstanding and the rifle was shooting bug holes with Fed.Match. We have since had a total of seven rifles built by KMW and he will continue to get our business. It takes a while to get but he stays in touch on the project and it is very worth while when it falls out of the UPS truck. We have Chandlers, TBA and several other quality guns in our area and his is at least as good as theirs.

He keeps a backlog of work and will not let a rifle leave his shop until he has done the initial break-in and is satisfied with several consecutive groups. He has several pages of customer references complete with contact information for each. He is also one of us. By that, I mean he actually gets out and walks the walk. I haven't talked to him since the event but I was told he and his team mate took first place at the North American Sniper Championship in February. Both were shooting KMW rifles during the 4 day event.

Sorry for the spew. I don't owe this guy anything except my honest opinion. We are a thousand miles from him and he always treats us with honesty, enthusiasm and professionalism. I see him post here occaisionally and he doesn't blow his own horn. Knowing him, he never will either. Just wanted to pass on our experience with a shop that has several very happy customers many miles from his shop. ***maybe I'll get a cool KMW shirt if he sees this!**

Good Day.
Tom
Tom <Steelpl8t@aol.com>
Tacoma area, WA, USA - Wednesday, July 11, 2001 at 15:59:49 (ZULU) (your host address: 205.188.197.179)


Kevin R. Mussack (Andy's Dad)
Congratulations on your win. Know you will enjoy using the items.
HDR
HDR <hprudisell@aol.com>
Bartlesville, OK, USA - Wednesday, July 11, 2001 at 16:27:42 (ZULU) (your host address: 152.163.204.76)
Have to weigh in on the custom rifle debate.

First let me say I have a weakness for custom 1911s, so we know I'm not right in the head..

Have shot the Storm match against some pretty good folks with some mighty expensive gear [some provided by our tax money] for the last three years...I shot a factory, off the shelf rifle with good optics and a LOT of boolits through it. Didn't embarass[sp?] myself one bit. Was looking forward to this years match, but I guess it's history. Point is, as much as I'd like to have a custom sniper rifle, I'd rather spend the $s on ammo and travelling to shoot Praire dogs etc.. I think, for me, the time behind the gun is more important than which gun I'm behind..

Got to shoot a SAKO TRG42 in 338 Lapua mag. friday and Sat..It shot in the .3s out to 300[all we had] and with the muzzle brake was very pleasant to shoot..
 

outa here
Markwell <markwell@hardynet.com>
The Alleghenies, WV, USA - Wednesday, July 11, 2001 at 19:09:53 (ZULU) (your host address: 63.92.148.172)


Paul,

Thanks, I will pull down some SS109, remove .5 of powder, and seat some 69gr Sierras.
I did go to the range today and shot some 52gr BTHP Match out of it. Had it loaded up to about 3000 fps. It Shot MOA. This is likely the keeper load for now. Not bad with a 14.5" barrel, and ACOG Reflex sight.
You all see where SMTC is hosting a Long Range Varmint Hunters class in Sept? Check out their website for details.

Later,
Bill B <dc8plumber@aol.com>
Outback, ky, USA - Wednesday, July 11, 2001 at 20:11:16 (ZULU) (your host address: 205.188.193.153)


WELCOME BACK MAJOR!!!!!! THANK GOODNESS!!!!!!!!

If you like the people on instant mesenger that have had to put up with Ken can get together with you and fill you in on the REAL stories from the last months ;)

Bribery and extortion, I LOVE the concepts! Bolt out!
Bolt <reeldoctor@mindspring.com>
NC, USA - Wednesday, July 11, 2001 at 20:50:47 (ZULU) (your host address: 63.50.55.203)


Bill B.

Try also to pull the SS109 bullets and replace them with the 60 gr VMax keeping the same powder charge. Less work!

Semper Fi

Paul <paulcockerham@att.net>
Reston, VA, USA - Wednesday, July 11, 2001 at 21:08:21 (ZULU) (your host address: 216.173.17.78)


Hope this isn't too redundant.

I've seen that the general concensus of the Roster is that a 175grn Match King at 2675fps does pretty good with the 30-06 cam on a Leupold M3 type glass. My question is this: Would a 180grn Match King at the prescribed 2700fps match the trajectory of the cam better? Just wondering as I'm a new M3 user and want to know.
Thanks.

Semper Fi

Steve
Steve <Fang33937@cs.com>
Albemarle, NC, USA - Wednesday, July 11, 2001 at 23:25:30 (ZULU) (your host address: 152.163.205.61)


All the reloaders out there, I need some help! I am looking into doing some reloading with 178gr. AMAX. I know, 175gr SMK are the standard, but I want to be able to shoot more than paper with this rifle. The boolets will be traveling out of a Rem VS. Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thanks guys.
Mayhem <killare@hotmail.com>
USA - Thursday, July 12, 2001 at 06:11:57 (ZULU) (your host address: 64.12.106.48)
Mayhem,

go to : http://www.snipercountry.com/hottips/Ballistics308.htm
and snoop a bit for data.

Theres more, but I can't remember where its at...................
 
 

peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
Wheezing & Geezing in Big City, By-Gawd, USA - Thursday, July 12, 2001 at 10:06:16 (ZULU) (your host address: 64.12.102.39)


Hey Hogs...

Great site. I've been lurking a long time but this is my first post.
I was a usmc sgt (0311) and rifle range coach but I'm pretty inexperienced in shooting w/ a scoped precision rifle. So I've got a newbie question.....

I was in the desert in eastern WA a couple of weeks ago, shooting my Rem PSS .308. It's scoped w/ a Springfield Armory Gov't Model (1st gen) 4.5x14x56. (I know, I know...I'm saving up for Loopy...)
Ambient temp= 100 F, wind= f.v. 3mph, sunny, range was 250 yds.
The mirage was really kicking my butt, making it difficult to focus on the tgt. I noticed, though, that the mirage through my Steiner
7x50 binos was not nearly so visible. (The barrel was cold, and the scope was set on 7x, same as the binos). Now, I know there's a big difference in the quality of the two optics, but don't understand why it would be manifested in this way. Can anyone advise why?

Also, has anyone had any experience with Iron Brigade Armory's PSS Tune-Up package? Seems like it would be a good deal...

Sorry for such a long post....thanks in advance for any advice.

Semper Fi
Justin Reese <WaveManMES@netscape.net>
Muncie, IN, USA - Thursday, July 12, 2001 at 19:13:06 (ZULU) (your host address: 209.43.60.55)


Justin,
I started out with the same SA scope. Mine wouldn't focus clearly at 100 yards for love nor money. Otherwise it was ok.

out
Kevin R. Mussack (Andy's Dad) <kmussack@aol.com>
Clifton Springs, New York, USA - Thursday, July 12, 2001 at 19:21:46 (ZULU) (your host address: 64.80.33.70)


Kevin (Andy's Dad),
I thought it was just my bad eyes....:)

Semper Fi
Justin Reese <WaveManMES@netscape.net>
Muncie, IN, USA - Thursday, July 12, 2001 at 19:48:29 (ZULU) (your host address: 209.43.60.55)


Justin.

First... mirage is more serious in optical scopes with large objective lenses.
... and, Second, it is less in binoculars than a single scope of the same dimensions.

In bins... the brain takes the "best" image at that moment, and processes it.
Because the optical paths are not the same, the amount of mirage at any moment is not the same, so the brain will constantly be processing both images, and making the best out what it gets from both.
If you are in the same conditions, and close one eye, the mirage will seem to get worse.

The larger the front objective, the worse the mirage... it you take a piece of cardboard with a 1" hole in it, and place it in front of the "Gen One"... you will see the mirage effects diminish substantially.

Lupita used to make screw in "apertures" that went in the front of the scope... each had a different sized hole in it... but people didn't understand how to use them, so they were discontinued.
"X" <condor@mags.net>
USA - Thursday, July 12, 2001 at 19:54:33 (ZULU) (your host address: 208.249.180.9)


"X"
You still never cease to amaze me with your wealth of knowledge!!! Good to see your still keeping an eye on things.

Looks like Wyoming and the D&L shoot will be a go for me this year again I found a partner. I nearly got to shoot with and "OLD" contibuter that hasn't been around in a long time Pat L. But we just got hooked up a little late.
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Thursday, July 12, 2001 at 20:33:44 (ZULU) (your host address: 207.41.18.3)


Gents,

Justin asked about the Chandler tune up package for the PSS...
Undoubtedly, top drawer, like most of their work...spendy.

First, most of the PSS's shoot pretty well out of the box. Better than we can, in most cases. Unless you're going to trash that shitty palm swell PSS stock for a McMillan I wouldn't do it.

Better yet, have George Gardner or Jerry Rice take the gun and restock it and work it over if you want. Much cheaper. Buy the Loopie scope with the remainder

If it were me, I'd get the new scope, invest in training, smile and be happy until you feel you need better equipment.

Semper Fi,

Wes Howe
(2502/1302)
Wes Howe <wsaa@proaxis.com>
Blodgett, OR, USA - Thursday, July 12, 2001 at 20:40:40 (ZULU) (your host address: 198.145.248.60)


.308 match ammo -

I know that for factory loaded match ammo, the Fed GMM (168 or 175) appears to be the default champion.

Black Hills also makes a BTHP match load in both 168 and 175 also. Does anybody have any experience, good or bad, with this stuff? Price wise, they seem to be comparable.

I guess the proof's in the x-ring. Any users?

Moe
Moe Mensale <mjmensale@aol.com>
Boca Raton, FL, USA - Thursday, July 12, 2001 at 23:33:46 (ZULU) (your host address: 205.188.195.37)


"X" -

Are you incognito?

Moe
Moe Mensale <mjmensale@aol.com>
Boca Raton, FL, USA - Thursday, July 12, 2001 at 23:39:04 (ZULU) (your host address: 205.188.195.37)


Factory Match Ammo:

I've shot a fair bit of both Fed GM and BH stuff, and I prefer the BH. It seems more consistent out of my rifles. Plus, I can get it cheaper than I can Fed GM. Try Georgia Precision if you don't have a local discount hook-up. They've got the best price on BH .308 168/175gr that I've been able to find. Click my name to go to thier BH ammo page.
Roger C. <madeditor75@hotmail.com>
Austin, TX, USA - Friday, July 13, 2001 at 00:05:43 (ZULU) (your host address: 24.93.42.230)


I was going through the contents of my sketch kit today and the thought came to me about bringing along a digital camera on operations. This would accomplish a couple of things. #1. It'll make my life easier because I won't have to screw around with all these sketches and the hassles of keeping them dry, not smudged etc. And #2 it'll improve the quality of the information because I can take lots more photos than I can draw sketches. Plus it's lots easier to leave a couple disks at a dead drop than paper sketches, possible transmission via DCT, cell modem etc. Looking about the web I have seen some fairly good camera deals(I think), but I was wondering a couple things. #1. Anybody play with this idea before? Opinions, comments, observations? #2 Any recommendations for hardware? I definately want a USB hookup, as well as some zoom. I was thinking of getting one on my own, and then when the command sees how much easier this is than paper, I can get them to fund more for the other teams. All comments welcome. Semper Fidelis...Ken M
Ken M <target1371@aol.com>
IL, USA - Friday, July 13, 2001 at 01:41:36 (ZULU) (your host address: 24.4.253.164)
I would like to compliment G.A. Precision at Denny's Guns (http://www.dennysguns.com/denny/aboutus.html) for the expert machine work they did on my Remington 700P/.308DM bolt handle. I've looked high and low and e-mailed many custom shops for a modification to the bolt handle that would extent the knob, but got nowhere until I read about such a mod' in snipercoutry.com web site. The factory bolt handle is just too short, requiring the shooter to use an up-turned palm to open the bolt then the little and ring fingers to pull it rearward if he doesn't want the back of his hand to mash against the scope------awkward! G.A. milled off the factory knob and installed what they call a "speed bolt" knob that is a longer, fatter knob that you can completely grasp while cycling the bolt w/out changing hand positions-----it looks and works great! Oh yeah, the color match is perfect, black matte aluminum. Check it out here, it is very cool: http://snipercountry.com/Articles/Rem700Police_Update.htm
Mark
Mark <ech47@aol.com>
USA - Friday, July 13, 2001 at 01:43:29 (ZULU) (your host address: 24.14.185.187)
After I consumed several John Daniels (I've known him long enough to call him John) two months ago, I bought a new Barrett M-99. Yes, it's a new twist on shooting at 300 yds and punching clean holes in one inch mild steel plate as well as destroying old chain saws and lawn mowers------parts all over the place. The only complaint I have about the Barrett owner's manual is that nowhere in there does it warn you that you must never ever, ever, ever,ever EVERRRRRRR tell you wife what it costs. Jesus, she found the receipt yesterday and I think I'm in for some stockade time. The PMS angel of death is now permanent party in our hootch and no bunker in sight. Please, someone call a slick in to medivac me out of this AO, I'm being overrun, my bride is coming through the wire and she has a bangalore torpedo under each arm. No claymores, outta ammo, radio batteries are dead AAAAAAAGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHH.................
Mark <ech47@aol.com>
Peoria, IL, USA - Friday, July 13, 2001 at 02:05:40 (ZULU) (your host address: 24.14.185.187)
Mark, A couple of suggestions, first, give/sell the Barrett to me. Then my Bride can be mad at us both, you for selling and me for buying! Or, divert the attention your bride is paying to your latest addition to what is by nature, and without any recognized standards, can only be a meager firearms collection, by bringing home a snake. This will only work if your bride has a strong dislike for things that slither. It worked for me, I couldn't seem to get my bride off that subject for 5 weeks. Sneaky Snake being AWOL during that time sure added to the intensity of our conversations.... Oh well, the fact I acquired a "Snake gun" Colt CAR didn't seem to matter.

Good luck.
5db <info@accu-shot.com>
Wichita, Ks, USA - Friday, July 13, 2001 at 02:53:21 (ZULU) (your host address: 216.236.19.188)


Gents,
I'm looking to get a .223 bolt-gun. I was checking out some prices and the Rem 700 VSSF actually costs about the same as the PSS or the LTR. Does any of these shoot any betterer than another. I know other than the stainless barrel and action (VSSF) and stock they are the same (right?) Does the shorter barrel length on the LTR affect accuracy at reasonable .223 (varmint) distances? Any Stealth comments? Sir Wes? Any input?
Thanks a mil(dot)
Later guys,
Rich S. <RS1441@aol.com>
Bal'mer, MD, USA - Friday, July 13, 2001 at 02:59:48 (ZULU) (your host address: 152.163.213.213)
Mark I nearly died laughing at your last post. I guess I have always made the mistake of asking my other half before I bought a new toy.

Undude, Where can I pick up a fastex buckle for 1.5 in webbing? I lost the male half of the belt buckel on my camelbak HAWG and camelbak has not responded to my e-mails.

Thanks a million,

Chad's Out!
Chad <rem700_308win@hotmail.com>
USA - Friday, July 13, 2001 at 03:36:08 (ZULU) (your host address: 216.236.19.154)


Have you tried REI? S/F..Ken M
Ken M <target1371@aol.com>
IL, USA - Friday, July 13, 2001 at 04:02:52 (ZULU) (your host address: 24.4.252.97)
Wes? On PSS tune-up. IBA did my PSS and it did shoot a fair deal better. I think the biggest improvement was achieved when Bruce Kocur recrowned the thing. They also removed solder overflow from the bolt camming surface and replaced the firing pin spring with a 28 pound Wolff spring (factory is 24 pounds). That said, Trigger50 wrote a checklist on improving the H&S stocked Remingtons that cover a lot of things you can do yourself. It's in the archives somewhere around Christmas/New Years I think. Some of the things I've done in the past have helped a great deal. The following is a repeat of a lot of stuff discussed in the past DR.

The H&S stocked Remingtons suffer from a few easily corrected problems. The most serious is barrel slap on the forend. Disassemble the rifle, removing the action from the stock. Inspect the inside of the barrel channel at the front of the stock. There will be a slick burnished area. That is the portion of the stock that is striking the barrel when the rifle is fired. Using coarse sandpaper, a rasp or similar tool, take about 10-15 thou off the bottom of the barrel channel in the area of the slap.

While disassembled, closely inspect the aluminum bedding block for any imperfections that may prevent the receiver from bottoming out evenly on the block. HS Precision does a superb job on their stocks but mass produced products will not one size fits all. Remove any paint, epoxy oooze, aluminum burrs etc from the block area. Do not worry, you are not going to hurt it by cleaning it up. Closely inspect the recoil lug area, making sure that the lug will seat at 90 degrees and that the recess is deep enough for the lug to bottom out. If the recess is too shallow, cut an eight of an inch out of the bottom with a mill or Dremel. On about half the rifles inspected, I have noticed that the guard bolts are impacting the inside of the bedding block holes. If this is happening to your rifle, you will see the concentric ring marks of the bolt thread pattern on the inside on the guard bolt holes, not to be confused with machining marks. They are very distinct and appear almost as knurling. Drill the guard holes out a few thousandths or 1/16 inch if easier. Replace the factory bolts with hex socket head bolts and torque the front to 65 inch pounds. Rear bolt from 50-65 inch-pounds. Experiment with the torque. You do not want to inadvertently bend the action in the stock. Most people just wind them in to 65 and leave em. Try changing the torque on the rear action bolt and test groups.

To minimize the bending moment, consider bedding the action. It is not hard if you pay attention to what you are doing and prepare the stock properly. Use MarineTex, Steel Bed, Steel or Titanium Devcon etc.

Nothing is going to fix that long POS throat except having someone pull the tube and rechamber it. If you are going to spend that kind of money, buy a good barrel and get the whole chalupa.
 

Mark. I'm with you brother, only in reverse. I tried to sell a scope. Had the buyer all lined up and everything when the Luscious Colonel asked me why there was a Mark 4 sitting on the desk. I should have been more alert by the tone but preoccupied, I innocently said, Someone needs it. It's just sitting in the safe so I'm going to sell it to him. BOOOM! "That is not what is going to happen honey." After a rather heated argument, the bottom line is I can pretty much buy anything I want. I just can't sell it afterward! I honestly don't know how their minds work. Patrick, I am very sorry.

Bill0294 <lhardin21@netscape.net>
Clearwater , FL, USA - Friday, July 13, 2001 at 04:36:43 (ZULU) (your host address: 24.26.65.148)


Gents,

Rich asked about a Winch M70 Stealth in .223. LOVE mine. Was able to do a credible trigger adjustment following patron 'lito's instructions. Darn thing shoots about 1/2 MOA with 69 gr. Sierra MK's.
It's a keeper. Doesn't have that god awful palm swell of the PSS either!

The PSS upgrades...as mentioned can be done by yourself, if handy. I'd go that route, first.

Just back from the range. Took my M25 and M40A1 clone. Both shot magnificantly! I shot Berger 190's and Sierra 175's in the bolt gun. Just ragged clusters at 100 yards as we were zeroing and testing this evening.

Used 175's that I loaded on the Dillon 550 B, after match prepping the LC Match brass. Damn load looks to shoot 5/8" out of the M25. The Dillon DOES load good ammo! Kewl...looks like I'm going to go through quite a bit of it in the near future.

All for now, getting late, and it's back to the job hunt tomorrow.

Semper Fi,

Wes
Wes Howe <wsaa@proaxis.com>
Blodgett, OR, USA - Friday, July 13, 2001 at 05:04:09 (ZULU) (your host address: 198.145.248.72)


At least you guys can buy or sell, one or the other. I can't do a freakin' thing without getting in trouble. I just need to grow up don't I? NEVER!!!!

Semper Fi

Steve
Steve <Fang33937@cs.com>
Albemarle, NC, USA - Friday, July 13, 2001 at 05:16:44 (ZULU) (your host address: 152.163.206.204)


Bill294 Wrote:
"Replace the factory bolts with hex socket head bolts and torque the front to 65 inch pounds. Rear bolt from 50-65 inch-pounds."

You may want to be careful with torques that high on any rifle without a steel floor plate and pillar bedding. There is a posibility of bending or breaking or wearing away the bearing surface under action screws. I don't know for sure.

Just a cautionary note.

out
Kevin R. Mussack (Andy's Dad) <kmussack@aol.com>
Clifton Springs, New York, USA - Friday, July 13, 2001 at 11:53:07 (ZULU) (your host address: 64.80.33.70)


Hi Folks

I've been lurking for some time, this is my first post.

Does anyone have experience of the Lapua Scenar bullets in 155gr and 167gr. I'm particularly looking for loads using Varget or N140. Bullets will be in 308 Lapua cases and fired from a Rem VSSF.

Any observations on how these bullets compare to Match Kings?

Regards

Ray
Ray Smith <rayokyah@omantel.net.om>
Muscat, Oman - Friday, July 13, 2001 at 11:53:22 (ZULU) (your host address: 209.58.12.44)


Kevin..
I have never had any problems with the original floor plates in my remingtons and I torque them to 60 inch lbs. The thing to make sure of is that there is no binding anywere or high spots and then make sure the magazine fits into the floor plate before tighting it down.

My one old PSS is on its 3rd barrel and still going and the floor plate is still the original. With that said your right to caution them but if everything is square it won't hurt to tighten them down.
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Friday, July 13, 2001 at 13:53:07 (ZULU) (your host address: 207.41.18.3)


Ray,

Reference Lapua ammo

I have been using 44 grains of N140 behind the 167 Scenar and 170 gr lockbase. 167 Scenar is in the old red box factory loads while the 170 is in the new Lupua blue box loads. I use exclusively the 170 gr and have been very happy with it in my Accuracy International AW. I used to use 168 Sierras but switched to the 170 gr. No reason based on performance. I have not noticed any performance difference but I just like the lapua. I try to match the factory load and have achieve excellent results. The N140 is very consistant.

Either on will serve you well. The lapua brass is excellent quality. Hold onto them. Give me a shout if you have any questions. Thanks

Jeff in Canada
JC Wilson <blackhawk@mb.sympatico.ca>
Canada - Friday, July 13, 2001 at 13:59:14 (ZULU) (your host address: 205.200.254.110)


Thanks to everyone for the info (ref. optics & accurizing)...
You guys ever try to fly commercial w/ all your shooting stuff?
Geez....they almost didn't let me bring my ammo 'cause it was handloaded and packaged in ziplock baggies (and thus not in the "original factory box") and they wouldn't let me bring bow-flage
paint.....seems it's a "hazardous material."

-Justin
Justin Reese <WaveManMES@netscape.net>
Muncie, IN, USA - Friday, July 13, 2001 at 16:16:46 (ZULU) (your host address: 209.43.60.71)


Ref: Neat Picture

I was wandering around the net today and found a picture of Andy and me at SMTC. Kewl!

http://www.stormmountain.com/photos.html

We're the (LRR2 Alternate Position) picture.

Sorry, no faces shown.....OPSEC you know.

out
Kevin R. Mussack (Andy's Dad) <kmussack@aol.com>
Clifton Springs, New York, USA - Friday, July 13, 2001 at 18:01:20 (ZULU) (your host address: 64.80.33.70)


Justin: I can sympatize with you on the airlines, I learned a long time ago NEVER claim you have ammo you'll save yourself a lot of hassle. Just pack it in with your clothes with your checked baggage and let it be. Best thing for anyone traveling on a hunting trip or to a class or a match or something, check in the local area to see if there is a place or if the outfitter will except it UPS and then send ammo and non essential items via UPS. The cost is not that much and you don't have to lug it around with you. Just pick it up when you get there. I've been burned before by the airlines on oversize, over weight, hazardous material, special handling (dry ice) charges. For what they charged you could have bought another seat on the plane.
TonyY <ayackowski@pershing.com>
Woodbridge, NJ, USA - Friday, July 13, 2001 at 18:15:25 (ZULU) (your host address: 32.97.88.102)
Hey Kevin did you check out that McBros 300WM set-up next to you, you know the one with that VIAS brake. I bet that thing shook you up a little....
TonyY <ayackowski@pershing.com>
Woodbridge, NJ, USA - Friday, July 13, 2001 at 18:37:55 (ZULU) (your host address: 32.97.88.102)
Jason in Ohio,

Check out the review on US Optics by Mike Miller. There is a phone number at the end of the review to contact US Optics. I would call and order a catalog. Email me if you want to. See you next week.

Have a good night at the FD.

Later,
Bill B <dc8plumber@aol.com>
Outback , KY, USA - Friday, July 13, 2001 at 20:34:49 (ZULU) (your host address: 152.163.204.54)


THANKS to George Gardner
I received my 300mag back from George a week ago and decided it needed tweaked a little more. I had a day off so I ran it down to GA Precision Thurs. Met George and his crew for the first time. They acted like we known each other for quite awhile. He did the adjustments that I wanted and completly showed me what he had done to the rifle originally, a tour of his shop, and then all of us went out to dinner. THANKS to George and his crew for the hospitality. THANKS Doug GOOD LUCK in New Mexico.
Doug <dkb@pcpartner.net>
USA - Friday, July 13, 2001 at 20:42:49 (ZULU) (your host address: 207.177.19.120)
KEN/DIGITAL CAMERAS:

Good timing on the subject! Just wrote an article for the DR on Info Gathering and touched on that a bit with the dead drop issue. I will email you a draft and would appreciate your thoughts (thanks for "volunteering!").

A picture is worth a thousand words and cameras make better pictures than I can and you are dead on about digital dissemination.

The only catch is "IF your unit has the time and capabilities to process it." And picking up info at dead drops is risky and hard to coordinate since you are usually well forward of the FFU. However, its very useful if it can be done.

We used spent star cluster tubes to store the notes in and a zip loc although the tube itself did well without the plastic bag.

The cameras we had were the "fire and forget" type and waterproof. MAKE SURE TO DISABLE THE FLASH! We painted the camo and they really paid off for us. We tried them with spotting scopes and NVDs pushed up against the lens and got some decent though not spectacular results. We were able to get Infra Red film through the S2 for live missions although I never once got to see how they came out. They just kept telling me how expensive it was.

Good Post! Look forward to your comments on the article.
 

Jefe

Jefe <diabloazul01@hotmail.com>
- Friday, July 13, 2001 at 22:58:56 (ZULU) (your host address: 200.24.67.66)


Kevin (Andy's dad) -

What's with that tripod in the picture? Assume its been modified to handle a gun stock?

BTW, how old is Andy? How long as he been shooting?

Moe
Moe Mensale <mjmensale@aol.com>
Boca Raton, FL, USA - Friday, July 13, 2001 at 23:07:07 (ZULU) (your host address: 205.188.195.43)


Loopy M3LR -

Finally got to shoot the Rem 700P/.308 at 600 yards today (along with 200 and 300 yards).

I was using Fed GMM 175s with the 30-06 cam on the Loopy. Good, strong 15 MPH wind blowing left to right.

At each firing line, I dialed the range in, acquired the target, squeezed, BANG - on paper and in the black.

The guys I was with were amazed with the scope. They weren't familiar with the BDC thingy and thought it was the coolest thing they had ever seen. Dial the range, no counting (and forgetting) turret revolutions and you're on paper!

I gotta admit, I initially had some trepidations at the 600 yard line but it works.

The gun is box stock with the exception of a "X" trigger job. It's a good, solid, 1MOA shooter. Now I'll just shoot the barrel out before spending any $$$ on fancy upgrades.

Thanks for the cam hints and the trigger job instructions, "X".

Moe
Moe Mensale <mjmensale@aol.com>
Boca Raton, FL, USA - Friday, July 13, 2001 at 23:30:30 (ZULU) (your host address: 205.188.195.43)


Gentlemen

What kind of velocity expectations should I look for when fireing Federal GM 168's or Black Hills 168's through a quality 20" or 22" match barrel? Considering a somewhat lighter more compact rifle for use from 0 to 600 yards.

Any comments or opinions welcome.

Thanks.
Bill.
Bill Byford <byfords@otbnet.com>
IL, USA - Friday, July 13, 2001 at 23:32:04 (ZULU) (your host address: 4.22.166.169)


This is only "slightly" off topic. When you buy a new hydration system what's the best way to get rid of that "plastic" taste that seems to be inescapable in these systems? Especially prior to first use.

Thanks

Sarge
 
 
 

Sarge <garryrn@zianet.com>
Southern Area 51, NM, USA - Friday, July 13, 2001 at 23:32:33 (ZULU) (your host address: 216.243.125.130)


Moe,
The tripod has a half round section of PVC pipe padded with USGI sleeping matt as a special rest. This rest is attached with a 1/4-20 insert that fits the screw in the tripod. A couple cans of Walmart camo. paint and you're in business. It makes shooting movers a joy.

Andy is 15 now. That picture was taken on our second trip to SMTC on his 13th birthday. The year prior he took Top Gun in LRR1. He's been shooting since he was six. He underwent the usual progression form airgun to .22RF to .223 to .308.
Now he's found out about girls so there are some conflicts in his shooting schedule. It's a phase......

out
Kevin R. Mussack (Andy's Dad) <kmussack@aol.com>
Clifton Springs, New York, USA - Friday, July 13, 2001 at 23:57:11 (ZULU) (your host address: 205.188.198.177)