Larry
Larry J. Porter <skporter@nts-online.net>
Boonies of the Panhandle, Texas, USA - Friday, May 19, 2000 at 02:33:27
(ZULU) (your host address: 216.167.132.161)
DM vs Sniper - This is a matter of mission and not name. In the scenerios I've seen on the roster, it would be up to the sniper to match the right hammer to the right job. Who would use a brass mallet when a sledge is required or better still who would use a hammer when a nail gun would be faster and appropriate, ask Norm of the New Yankee Workshop. To argue that one gun is better than another all the time is not going to ever work. There are times when the bolt gun is the required tool, there are times when a fast shooting M4 is the required tool. There are times, to include Africa scenerio, when both are required. Try taking out some low life using a human shield at 300 meters with a weapon designed to take down the human wave attack. But that weapon to take down the human wave will be needed to protect the whole. One is for more steel on target and the other is for the surgical under adverse conditions. You can't have one without the other, just match the tools with the requirements. My arguement is that the semi, in it's present form, will not replace the bolt gun for that surgical. That bolt gun will not hold terrain though and it can not be decisively engaged. That is its big weakness. Though with proper planning and assessment of the situation, the sniper can put a package together that will prevail.
Got to go guys have fun for th next couple weeks. I will be thinking of you guys AND "gals" (?what is the accptable word now days?) while I go on my vacation.
Rick
Rick <rbowcher@aol.com>
Fayetteville, NC, USA - Friday, May 19, 2000 at 02:47:36 (ZULU) (your
host address: 152.163.206.183)
High Power Question: Am I suffering paralysis by analysis, and using up a perfectly good barrel testing loads? I plan to chase some leg points this summer, and I would like NOT to LOSE them at 600.
Dave Liwanag, 'Lito, UnDude & company, do you guys think I am
expecting too much out of my 600 yard AR load? It consistently groups just
over 3.00" for 10 shot groups with open sights at 300 yards off sandbags.
(The distance I test all loads at initially. I will shoot it at 600 this
weekend.) My scope mount is FUBAR, so I have to rely on the iron sights
right now. Maybe our AMU guy (sorry, I forgot your name) can help me out,
what do you consider an acceptable group for a 600 yard AR15/M16 load?
As a point of reference, I have a 77gr Sierra load for 200 & 300 that
I can keep 10 shots in 2.5" at 300 off of sand bags.
steve <hockyref@bellatlantic.net>
Paralysis by analysis, in south west PA, USA - Friday, May 19, 2000
at 04:37:43 (ZULU) (your host address: 151.201.122.218)
And Kevin of the North: I'm also a big beleiver in a pistol as well.
Not so much for necessity as the psycological comfort it gives. I KNOW
what kind of a pistol shot I am, and I KNOW what kind of a rifle shot I
am. So I love the pistol, and will give Mike a "teaching challenge" :-)
Bravo <Bravo762@yahoo.com>
Oh, I wish I lived in the land of liberty, but I guess I have to settle
for the, USA - Friday, May 19, 2000 at 04:45:43 (ZULU) (your host address:
209.180.85.200)
I love my M1A, but the groups open up when the bbl gets hot. Plus,
after 2 Mudville matches in the rain, I am going to have Jerry Rice redo
a M700 I have recently purchased. You don't need to be in the bush for
several days to see the difference between the two systems. One rainy Mudville
will convince you. The "beast" funtioned flawlessly, but when that flaky
gravel that is on the firing line sticks to you, your scope, and all over
your weapon, you see the light.
Spud,
Semper-Fi!
Out
Dennis <usmcspud@mindspring.com>
merced, Kalisocialistfornia, USA - Friday, May 19, 2000 at 06:45:14
(ZULU) (your host address: 199.174.220.68)
I have decidade to trade my Leupold Tactical Vari III 4.5-14 40mm
for another scope.
It may be a Kahles 6x42 K-ZF95 Mil-Dot or a Schmidt und Bender 3-12x50
Police Marksman P-1 Bryant.
My Leupold has a mil-dot reticle so I know what to expect but the Bryant reticle is unknown to me (its capabilities).
Finnaly my main goal it to aquire a scope with the better build quality and rugedness.
Could you please be so kind to help me with your expertise?
Thank you.
P. Marcos
Luso <nop26522@mail.telepac.pt>
Lusitania - Friday, May 19, 2000 at 08:12:35 (ZULU) (your host address:
194.65.14.68)
We agree on the bolt v. Semi thing (same page of music again ;)... and you said it well.
Bravo Dudeski!!...
Yes, it's your fault!... and Hathcock's spotter carried a 14 also,
and did it prowd in "Elephant Vally"... each gun's attributes supporting
the other, to the major dismay of the enemy!
If the world goes to hell in a hand basket, and they're burning down the houses on the next street, you can plop your raggity-assed M1A on my porch any time ;)
'lito
Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Friday, May 19, 2000 at 08:25:12 (ZULU) (your host address: 208.249.180.105)
Paul M. <prmayne@ala.net>
USA - Friday, May 19, 2000 at 08:57:41 (ZULU) (your host address: 208.2.26.196)
http://www.crosscircuit.com/html/Musicals/JPoppins.html
An extremely well done spoof on a well known official. Be patient
with it - it takes about 5 minutes for the whole show...
Ken :)
Ken <Ken@Hunters.org>
Nokesville, Va, USA - Friday, May 19, 2000 at 12:15:45 (ZULU) (your
host address: 4.3.240.234)
http://www.crosscircuit.com/html/Musicals/JPoppins.html
An extremely well done spoof on a well known official...Be patient
with it - takes about 3 to 4 minutes for the whole show.
Ken :)
Ken <Ken@Hunters.org>
Nokesville, Va, USA - Friday, May 19, 2000 at 12:17:09 (ZULU) (your
host address: 4.3.240.234)
*******************************************
Anyone seen this? Is it true? Is DoD returning to the practice of
not practicing marksmanship, again? I thought DoD was getting more into
marksmanship. Does this also mean that CMP is going away, perhaps?
Hank <ninesoft2@earthlink.net>
Denver, USA - Friday, May 19, 2000 at 15:12:22 (ZULU) (your host address:
216.160.133.50)
"A country too long at peace inevitably attacks itself".
(I don't know who authored this, but it seems to fit)
Al S.
Al Simon <asimon@gj.net>
the divided State of, Colorado, USA - Friday, May 19, 2000 at 16:04:59
(ZULU) (your host address: 216.169.65.235)
Re: Civilian sniper schools.
Check out www.stormmountain.com or contact bobbywhit@hotmail.com.
Storm Mountain is about as close as you're gonna find to a military style sniper course and Bobby runs a fine course also.
You might also consider the "Hardrock" matches put on at Ft Benning each month. While not schools they are sniper oriented matches and you will learn a lot by attending them. Contact Rusty Rossey at hardrock308@mindspring.com for more info.
On the USAR team. Too bad. Its a shame. Having been knee deep in the active USMC team and the ARNG budget process's at their MTU's I don't know if I would look at the Clinton admin as being the root of this. Most of the time its the budget fags at DA/HQMC etc that force this. In the reserve forces its all about recruiting and retention. If you can't tie into this, you're out.
Out
Gooch <kentgooch@hotmail.com>
USA - Friday, May 19, 2000 at 16:19:07 (ZULU) (your host address: 129.71.17.176)
I read your comments on the current state of the military. And have to say that most people have know Idea how bad it really is.
I got out amost 3 years ago. I started on a fast attach submarine (10 years ago) where if I even thought about a mistake or hesitated with an answer for a qualification, I was knocked on my a#$%%%%**.
After sea duty I was assigned to a submarine tender which was about 65% female because there was no other place for them in the US Navy. Also it made getting a good shore billet almost impossible.
As for the submarine tender duty, most of the women there were single parents who always had an excuse why they had to go home early or why work just could not get done because of sick kids.
Trust me I could go on and on about this subject.
Bottom Line is that the personel on the submarines are highly trained but they are not responsible and no were near the quality of the submariners 10-15 years ago. Because we are not allowed to train them properly. The people repairing these submarines are even worse.
I really hope we are not involved any thing resembling a war in our current state because some LESSONS will be learned the hard way and people will die just because they are not properly prepared and the equipment is not battle ready.
thanks for the opportunity to voice my opinion.
Bryan <bherman699@aol.com>
Murrieta , CA, USA - Friday, May 19, 2000 at 17:38:01 (ZULU) (your
host address: 152.163.213.194)
On Pistols, Bravo, anyone that can shoot a pistol can be trained to shoot a rifle minus handicaps. I have carried a pistol for a long time, daily, and just prefer a rifle to save my butt. Seen too many guys say "PLease dont shoot me again"
Got to go
Undude
MikeMiller <Tactical@tacticalintervention.com>
Calif, USA - Friday, May 19, 2000 at 18:25:34 (ZULU) (your host address:
205.188.200.47)
What Gooch said re: the "Hardrock" matches is accurate. I'm pretty much a newbie, really, at this. This will be my first complete year competing in matches.
The matches are on Sundays(as a rule) at the Ft. Benning English Range. These happen once a month. The other half of the tactical series is held in Ala. on a private farm. Magnificent place complete with 1000yd range. I'm getting up at 3AM tomorrow to drive there and try to get some zero shots in before the relays. The Alabama matches are generally once a month, as well. So it's two matches per month, usually.
Anyway, there are many great people; great equipment; great atmosphere. You can learn a lot ( I have). Not to mention the thrill of the doing. My excitement is my own worst enemy, but that's one of many reasons I go.
Rusty is a great guy, and I'm sure he would provide you with details. Also, the phone # for the Benning Club is 706 689 3371. Ask for Mr. McQuinn or Jim Graham. I'd throw in their email but EDS has clamped shut the corporate mailsystems due to the lastest virus scare. I think it's brpc@mindspring.com or some such.
Hey, you're in Columbus !!! You're right there..
Jeff A.
Jeff A. <d1k2l3@smyrnacable.net>
Smyrna, GA, USA - Friday, May 19, 2000 at 22:19:24 (ZULU) (your host
address: 139.76.64.4)
I've only messed with half of the thing so far and its easy to lose yourself in it. Its very well done and to tell you the truth... I wish I had thought of it!!
As soon as I can convince the rest of TRGT to come on board we will be selling it.
Out
Gooch <kentgooch@hotmail.com>
USA - Saturday, May 20, 2000 at 03:38:48 (ZULU) (your host address:
129.71.17.175)
Kent
Gooch <kentgooch@hotmail.com>
USA - Saturday, May 20, 2000 at 03:53:45 (ZULU) (your host address:
129.71.17.175)
Now go shoot. A lot. Replace barrel as needed.
STOP THE MADNESS! Stop couch-potato G-2'ing gear picks. Strap it on and go to the woods. If you don't need it, dump it. If you do need it, get it.
Sniper versus tank? You're kidding, right? I doubt a thermal-sighted main-gunner is going to use his co-ax machinegun on one knucklehead and spotter when his TC's body falls through the hatch and lands on his head. He's looking for the next incoming (fill in here: TOW, Javelin, Milan, HOT, LAW, RPG, Sagger, etc.) that's gonna smoke him. History example: Israeli tank commanders suffer the highest head/upper torso wounds of their combat arms. So did the Soviets in Afghanistan, and now the Russians in Chechnya. A buttoned-up tank is blind.
Thanks, Paul.
Dave Liwanag <dliwanag@mgfairfax.rr.com>
USA - Saturday, May 20, 2000 at 04:11:24 (ZULU) (your host address:
24.163.112.159)
Tanks: come on you think a sniper det is going to be a priority, maybe after all the anti-armour systems are dealt with. Besides you really want to take a shot at any old tank? - Sqn comd and up yeah... but hey button em up with arty - them burn 'em with tow. Also re:thermal, you can't tell a sniper det from a fire team so why waste a HEAT rd when .50 or 7.62 coax will do.
Spotters: (I'll rest on this after - I swear) Ideally your spotter
is a qualified sniper as well - and you will be switching on and off -
Esp. if you are in a hide for awhile. Now you see the tgt - wake your buddy
- do you really want him to shoot now? Best he acts as spotter while you
do the shooting - given that, do you really want a gas gun?
M4A1's are good to at least 600m, not ideal, but sufficent. Yes
there are times when a M21/25, SR-25 etc. will do, but I don't think many
of us would want to be limited in that way - One round can get by, but
after three or four even a pre-schooler can narrow your position down
BUT I am quite willing to admit to scenarios that a 7.62 gas gun
is an effective (and possbily welcomed) aid. Tailor you kit to the mission,
not limit the mission due to your kit's insufficiencies (HEY any CDN Brass
watching)
Kevin <kevmich@cadvision.com>
Canada - Saturday, May 20, 2000 at 04:21:28 (ZULU) (your host address:
207.148.143.206)
first of all, the feedback on the choice of the "tools of the trade" you all gave was invaluable and admittedly I came out being far better informed in a lot of things. But my own beleif and bottomline regarding equipment still remains the same : Equipment is equipment and the best choise is the "hammer" that one's training, tactical, operational and deployment doctrine allows one to perform at maximum efficiency.
When it comes what "tool" shoots better MOA's, with all things being equal (training and judgement ability), I think from now on I will only accept statements that are based on test results derived from purely mechanical methods.
Want to compare two weapons ? Put the weapons, each one in turn in an anchored, stable, non-flexible vise made out of tool steel and conduct firing tests at staged distance ranges and controlled conditions.
Then take the firearms for a trip in your favourite Indian/mud/hill/mountain/
Perhaps this is "a" or "the" way to distinguish who manufactures a true combat weapon system and who manufactures something that shoots nice little tight MOA's only when the stock is glass beaded, the ammunition is handloaded with surgical precision, the shooter visits a gunsmith whose middle name is "Yoda" every week and the rifle is shot only every 15th day of the month after being trasported to the range in a velvet lined guncase (and the oracle advises the shooter that the planet allignment is right).
All firearms created equal ? You bet they are not. But nearly all
combat rifles, properly maintained, fall within a comparable and, most
importantly, predictable range of operating efficiency under nearly any
operating condition. On the other side, one comes across a civvie firearm
that boasts an AK/HK/Rem 700/K98/
Anybody under the impression that Vassily Zaitsev or Major Walter Könings returned after every mission to a beer cooler and a master armourer to breastfeed their rifles ?
This post is way too long and it is way too late in the day. Just disregard it... nothing but the ramblings of a youngster...
Ares
AresP <ares@ezo.net>
Canton, OH, USA - Saturday, May 20, 2000 at 08:49:28 (ZULU) (your host
address: 24.93.223.224)
Ares
AresP <ares@ezo.net>
Canton, OH, USA - Saturday, May 20, 2000 at 09:14:30 (ZULU) (your host
address: 24.93.223.224)
Why does everyone make the assumption a sniper must ALWAYS shoot and run away? If you're on the OFFENSIVE, with your own mutually protecting infantry, tanks, and indirect fire, you swing a mighty club as well.
Walter Reed Army Medical Research Center has done great studies on sleep deprivation. A guy may be a walking zombie after 24-48 hours continuous without sleep, and it DOES NOT affect accuracy. With a sniper rifle or 25mm chain gun he will consistently nail any target. Problem now becomes a clouded judgment call (his reactions are hindered about the same as a .01 blood-alcohol content) -- he can smoke the target within a half-minute of angle accuracy. New problem -- he smokes a friendly 50-75% of the time, bigger than Stuttgart during Oktoberfest.
Oh, and tanks seldom travel without infantry.
Dave Liwanag <dliwanag@mgfairfax.rr.com>
USA - Saturday, May 20, 2000 at 13:32:51 (ZULU) (your host address:
24.163.112.159)
Anyone know if a Chandler Tactical Precision Mount will fit on an HS Precision (HTR) action?
HS says "anything that will fit a Rem 700 will fit ours as well..." but IBA says they've had at least one of their customers in TX tell them the Mount did NOT fit....
Thanks.
Mat
Mat Cannava <nanook@voyager.net>
Soldotna, Alaska, USA - Saturday, May 20, 2000 at 13:52:51 (ZULU) (your
host address: 207.90.112.97)
DNH <dh972@aol.com>
USA - Saturday, May 20, 2000 at 13:55:25 (ZULU) (your host address:
205.188.198.56)
But they re-named the stuff, made some cosmetic changes, and it is still on the civilian market, without the "scary name".
'lito
Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Saturday, May 20, 2000 at 15:58:35 (ZULU) (your host address:
208.249.180.79)
Ares: A rest/vise is probably not a realistic field expedient, but
some good points.
Kevin <kevmich@cadvision.com>
Canada - Saturday, May 20, 2000 at 16:36:04 (ZULU) (your host address:
207.148.141.1)
"CMP Rule 4-18. Ammunition. A. Rifle. Rifle competitors may use any safe ammunition."
The Navy issues Leg Match 7.62 and 5.56mm ammo to shooters who bring
their score card to center of the line prior to first relay.
Dave Liwanag <dliwanag@mgfairfax.rr.com>
USA - Saturday, May 20, 2000 at 20:14:50 (ZULU) (your host address:
24.163.112.159)
Just finished doing my trigger as per Lito's extremely well written step by step instructions. I now have a smooth as glass 30 oz. trigger. Which should help my group size tremendously.
I encourage others to follow his instructions to the letter and you to will be plesantly surprised with the results.
Again, hats off to lito for sharing his expertise.
Danny
Danny Reever <dreever@supernet.com>
Arendtsville, Pa, USA - Saturday, May 20, 2000 at 20:42:20 (ZULU) (your
host address: 64.41.36.75)
IN MY OPINION too many people take their triggers too light. In my mind there is nothing wrong with a good, crisp 3 - 3.5 pound trigger. Here is my thought process...
1. In my personal experience I've had a problem with keeping a good firm grip on the rifle when the trigger gets too light. I tend to want to "baby" the trigger and lighten my grip with a light trigger.
2. I think a sub 3 pound trigger is too light for a tactical shooter when under stress. I had a light trigger (around 2 pounds) on my M24 when I went through the Army course and had a "AD" for my first sighter shot on the KD qual. I was settling in for the first shot and whoa nellie!! M40A1s are set at 3.5 pounds and my C24 is at 3.2 pounds and that's just about right for me. I can lay the finger on the trigger, get settled etc without fear of launching. I'm not talking about leaving my finger on the trigger between shots. Just talking about the placing the finger on the trigger just prior to the shot.
3. A light trigger doesn't have an absolute correlation to smaller group size. Good trigger control does. Now it could be argued that a lighter trigger makes trigger control easier but I think you lose a degree of control when you go below a certain level.
Any other thoughts on this? Lets get buisy!!
Out here
Gooch <kentgooch@hotmail.com>
USA - Sunday, May 21, 2000 at 03:17:56 (ZULU) (your host address: 129.71.17.183)
out
Gooch <kentgooch@hotmail.com>
USA - Sunday, May 21, 2000 at 04:03:13 (ZULU) (your host address: 129.71.17.183)
Agree w/ Gooch on the trigger issue. Running down a wounded magpie
(12 Ga.) once a looong time ago and decided I'd finish 'im w/ one well-placed
.44 Spec. from my M29. He stopped, I stopped, and as I was pulling down
on 'im it went off in the dirt. That night the trigger was readjusted to
3 lbs. (single -action). Taught me a lesson.
Then there was the ND w/ my 7 mag... Went down range but I have
been satisfied w/ 3-5 lbs. depending on use in my firearms nowadays. What's
REALLY important is that clean break and lots of PRACTICE.
I too have used a face veil or scarf w/ my M1A. Works good but I
don't use it often. I attached some velcro to it and then velcro it to
my scope. Lays 'em right at my feet offhand and right next to the weapon
from prone. Excellent in tall grass.
May try it @ Mudville one day. I'm sure the bolt-gunner on my right
would be grateful.
Semper-Fi,
Spud,
Out
Dennis <usmcspud@mindspring.com>
merced, californicateya, USA - Sunday, May 21, 2000 at 05:52:14 (ZULU)
(your host address: 199.174.221.21)
Tactical rifles are meant for abuse, not coddling like some princely bench rest rifle. Now don't go getting the idea I wish somebody beating my noggin baseball bat style with an M-24 clone, buuuuut,
a 6mmPPC "Tactical rifle" w/ BR type trigger weight?????
One thing I understand is the Stress concept in training based on some real life experiences and a lotta IPSC (old style) and creative training some shooting buddies came up with in the late 1970s and early 1980's while training for L-E careers, or just self preservation in bad neighborhoods.
Once that blood gets pumping and adrenaline rushes along at light speed from doing something like a simulated 400 yard Foot pursuit followed by a brief bit of fancy gunplay with a .45 auto, 9mm, or .38 revolver You develop a greater understanding of your own own mortality and physical conditioning! Yep this is "Spindley little" peteR who doesn't get fed/eat enough talking.
For those fit enough to try a 100 yard dash, say from the target bank/butts to the firing line, then unlock your POV trunk, grab said unloaded & cased rifle, run to line, (walk if other shooters are present for safety), then load a round from an ammo box or SSP and fire it at a 2" sized "T" at 100 or 200 yards. Lets try under 5 minutes for start times and decrease it from there.
Light weight "Go buttons" (UNDER 2 1/2 LBS)are better left to either the Master Snipers, or those more interested in static position accuracy shooting.
Off my soap box, and away to start sawing trim on yet another persons
home in....
peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
BIG CITY, BY-GAWD, USA - Sunday, May 21, 2000 at 12:04:48 (ZULU) (your
host address: 205.188.193.183)
I'll probablt catch a lotta' flack for this, but I don't think there is "one right" weight.
You can spring set 5 different gun triggers to the same weight, and
when you shoot them, they will all feel different, due to the width (wide
ones feel lighter than narrow ones), and where the finger settles on the
trigger... lower feels lighter than higher.
Also, hands are different, and experence is different. It isn't
the number of ounces that matters, it's whether you are in control of it
that matters. If you are constantly wondering "when the hell is this sucka
going to let go"... it's too heavy.
If you are often surprised by it going off as you're just starting
up, it's too light... if you feel "it'll go any moment" and it does, you
are in control, and it's right for the gun, the type of shooting, and the
amount of stress/fatigue you have in that type of shooting.
I have field rifles that are 2 oz's (P'Dogs and Crows), and 5 pounds (Spotters matches)... and both are fine for the type of shooting they do.
Whatever it is, you need to be in control, and practice with it.
'lito.
Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Sunday, May 21, 2000 at 12:54:38 (ZULU) (your host address: 208.249.180.95)
On the Chandler Mount working on a standard Remington 700. I am not sure on this but I think they clip slot the receiver on the Chandler built guns(Like the Marines) and use that slot as another mounting point on the base. If that is the case the mount will only work with a clip slotted receiver. Cost to clip slot is about 150-200.00. More if painted black.LOL
On trigger: About 3lbs is about right. Less than that and you better use only that and pray you dont go bang when you were not ready to go bang.
Rick, have a nice vacation. If you see your daughter tell her to keep her head down.
I have been working with the XM107 from Barrett. Have not shot it at greatdistance yet, but so far I really like it. It is light, for a 50, and breaks down to the biggest piece being about 32" long. Barrett is sending a backpack designed for it. I will strap it on my back and see how the thing feels to pack when it gets here. Anyone have any favorite 50 calammo they would like to see tested in one? The M99 Barrett also came in. It is also fairly light(25lbs) and looks like a very promising less than $3000.00 50cal matchg rifle. All barretts now have Krieger bbls.
Gardner is working on a McBros based Navy 50cal. That one is just waiting on a KxP bbl.
I have been shooting a great deal of the BlackHills ammo lately. It is working out very well. Somebodt finally has come along to push Federal into getting the quality back into their ammo.
Undude/Mike
MikeMiller <Tactical@tacticalintervention.com>
Calif, USA - Sunday, May 21, 2000 at 12:58:45 (ZULU) (your host address:
148.165.83.143)
Bill Moore <lmalterna@aol.com>
Goodview, Va, USA - Sunday, May 21, 2000 at 16:49:26 (ZULU) (your host
address: 205.188.200.36)
Here is the address on the side of my Slope Doper,
D.P. Rolls
RT 1 Box 128R
Burlington, WV 26710
I bought mine from Hugo at T.R.G.T., ( www.trgt.com )
Kush out!
Kush <smak@pce.net>
Buffalo , ny, USA - Sunday, May 21, 2000 at 21:43:51 (ZULU) (your host
address: 12.28.201.32)
K. Long
E-mail chewie@srv.net
K. Long <chewie@srv.net>
Idaho, USA - Sunday, May 21, 2000 at 23:22:58 (ZULU) (your host address:
12.7.221.51)
I think anything less than 3.5 carries diminishing returns. If you
have to worry about dropping the hammer before you want it to it is too
light and you are wasting concentration. I tried the 3.5 with very cold,
dang near frost bit hands and could still feel it well.
Bolt <reeldoctor@mindspring.com>
USA - Monday, May 22, 2000 at 01:16:31 (ZULU) (your host address: 209.138.42.52)
Certificate Seeker <sniper@specialforces.army.net>
columbus, ga, USA - Monday, May 22, 2000 at 02:11:30 (ZULU) (your host
address: 216.67.76.105)
Certificate Seeker <sniper@specialforces.army.net>
columbus, ga, USA - Monday, May 22, 2000 at 02:11:54 (ZULU) (your host
address: 216.67.76.105)
Certificate Seeker <sniper@specialforces.army.net>
columbus, ga, USA - Monday, May 22, 2000 at 02:12:05 (ZULU) (your host
address: 216.67.76.105)
Certificate Seeker. Pound sand!!
Only reason this guy wants this certificate is to generate bogus credentials.
If you are a genuine graduate of the Benning course you contact them and get what you need.
Special Forces my ass!! Dude you're on the wrong website for this shit.
Out here.
Gooch <kentgooch@hotmail.com>
USA - Monday, May 22, 2000 at 02:36:05 (ZULU) (your host address: 129.71.17.150)
Adam <sniper@specialforces.army.net>
columbus, ga, USA - Monday, May 22, 2000 at 03:07:03 (ZULU) (your host
address: 216.67.76.105)
Dude!...you are asking for a load of trouble....
You are comming into the Internet from:
C:\>tracert 216.67.76.205
Tracing route to nas-76-205.boston.navipath.net [216.67.76.205]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms host1.hunters.org [207.233.164.1]
2 10 ms 20 ms 10 ms s3-3-1.crva001.volocom.net
3 10 ms 20 ms 20 ms s2-0.crva003.volocom.net
4 10 ms 20 ms 20 ms 166.90.148.89
5 10 ms 20 ms 20 ms gigaethernet5-ashington1.Level3.net [
6 10 ms 20 ms 20 ms so-6-0-0.mp1.Washington1.level3.net [
7 140 ms 241 ms 30 ms so-0-0-0.mp1.Weehawken1.level3.net
8 20 ms 30 ms 20 ms so-3-0-0.mp2.Weehawken1.level3.net
9 20 ms 20 ms 30 ms so-1-0-0.mp1.NewYork1.level3.net
10 50 ms 60 ms 130 ms 216.67.13.138
11 60 ms 60 ms 81 ms nyc2-r1-boston.navipath.net
12 60 ms 71 ms 90 ms nas9.boston.navipath.net [216.67.0.9]
13 371 ms 370 ms 351 ms nas-76-205.boston.navipath.net [216.67.76.205]
Most likely from the boston area - since dns naming that is done these days reflects equipment location too..
Navipath.net looks like your ISP....
Registrant:
NaviPath, Inc. (NAVIPATH2-DOM)
800 Federal Street
Andover, MA 01810
US
Domain Name: NAVIPATH.NET
Administrative Contact:
Investigations, Abuse (IA1764-ORG) abuse@NAVIPATH.COM
NaviPath, Inc.
800 Federal Street
Andover, MA 01810
US
877-628-4638
Fax- 978-933-6201
Technical Contact, Zone Contact:
Hostmaster, NaviPath (HN2394-ORG) hostmaster@NAVIPATH.COM
NaviPath, Inc.
800 Federal Street
Andover, MA 01810
US
877-628-4638
Fax- - 978-933-6201
Billing Contact:
Billing, Domain (BD3887-ORG) billing@NAVIPATH.COM
NaviPath, Inc.
800 Federal Street
Andover, MA 01810
US
877-628-4638
Fax- 978-933-6201
Record last updated on 07-Apr-2000.
Record expires on 11-Feb-2001.
Record created on 11-Feb-2000.
Database last updated on 20-May-2000 06:08:39 EDT.
Domain servers in listed order:
DNS.NAVINET.NET 216.67.14.5
DNS2.NAVINET.NET 216.67.31.254
They would probably not appreciate what you're doing.
More info if needed....
Ken :()
Ken <ken@hunters.org>
Nokesville, Va, USA - Monday, May 22, 2000 at 03:10:05 (ZULU) (your
host address: 207.233.164.10)
You'll be checkd out.
Gooch <kentgooch@hotmail.com>
USA - Monday, May 22, 2000 at 03:20:24 (ZULU) (your host address: 129.71.17.150)
THANKS
Sarge
Sarge <garryrn@dfn.com>
Area 51, NM, USA - Monday, May 22, 2000 at 03:24:06 (ZULU) (your host
address: 206.245.243.173)
Tac Pro Shooting Center- Bill Davison
35100 North State Hwy. 108
Mingus, TX 76463-6405
254/968-3112
254/968-5857 fax
tacpro@eaze.net
Frank, if Joe has said anything to you yet, I'll drive.
JFW
Jack <jackwilson@anglefire.com>
Ft. Worth, Texas, USA - Monday, May 22, 2000 at 04:07:04 (ZULU) (your
host address: 216.215.65.177)
PS. My diploma is sitting on the wall right next to me.
Thomas <email@snipersparadise.com>
South tip of Texas, USA - Monday, May 22, 2000 at 04:11:26 (ZULU) (your
host address: 208.193.197.99)
Regarding the Springfield SAR-8, here is the sitrep :
There are 2 types of SAR-8's; pre-ban and the post-ban versions.
Pre-Ban :
Wholy manufactured in Greece by the same company that supplies the
Greek armed forces, called "EBO", which is also stamped on the receiver
itself. That rifle's receiver is stamped steel WITHOUT an integrated weaver
scope mount. Rifle manufactured by original HK tooling and it is as close
to an HK as you can get without paying over $2500 for a used original HK-91.
It also has a muzzle break at the end which serves nothing but cosmetic
purposes since it is installed about 2 inches before the end of the barrel
and the break's end is flush with the barrel crown. Those rifles come with
a sporter stock and it is quite illegal to replace it with the pistol grip
for they were made 100% in a foreign country. Price ranges : NIB-$1500,
90%-99% condition at $1200. Both figures ballpark. Damn good piece of equipment
and no longer in production.
Post-Ban (like the one you are describing) :
Three words for you on this version of the rifle - Aluminium alloy
receiver. Although majority of parts still manufactured in Greece with
the same exact specs as German HK's, the receiver and several pieces in
the trigger assembly are manufactured in the US. Receiver is manufactured
by Hesse Arms in St Paul, MN (www.hessearms.com) and it is a butt ugly
piece of crap that heats up fast, bends and after a little while and the
bolt carrier instead of being guided by the grooves in the receiver, will
end up banging against them. This is the flat-top model with the integrated
weaver scope mount. If you pay more than $900 for this, you are being robbed.
My suggestion would be to stay away from it.
Both rifles have a stainless steel barrel but the huge drawback on both is that in both cases, it is button rifled.
Even with the pre-ban model, to achieve anything close to true sniper quality performance, you would have to remove the front sight (it is clamped on the barrel), change the barrel altogether (price variable), change the trigger assembly to a PSG-1 type (about $450), install an MSG-90 style forearm guard at a bargain price of about $800 and finally weld in reinforcement rods in the side external grooves on the sides of the receiver to increase receiver rigidity.
Oh, and an HK-style, copy claw mount for a scope made by A.R.M.S. will run you at about $220 (original HK runs at about $350, all prices ballpark).
Got cash ?
Ares
AresP <ares@ezo.net>
Canton, OH, USA - Monday, May 22, 2000 at 06:51:55 (ZULU) (your host
address: 24.93.223.224)
Try emailing them at sniperschool@benning-emh2.army.mil or calling them at (706) 545-6006 / 6985, ask for SSG Broseus and explain. You would be surprised that he might remember you, which would help tons. I stay in loose contact with him and if I need something, he is the one I contact. They should be starting another class on sunday, so this week would be your best chance to have them dig through back paperwork. You might also try faxing them if you can't get them on the phone (which is sometimes very hard) at (706) 545-6693. Do you still have your orders? If you do then that would be all they need to reissue a certificate without looking to hard.
Glad you understand why you got jumped on so fast. You would be surprised at some of the crazy people that would buy a certificate and then get someone killed because of their lack of training. I get requests for certificates for our classes from police officers all the time. They sometimes confuse friendship with weakness or stupidity.
Good luck. Thomas
Adam <email@snipersparadise.com>
South tip of Texas, USA - Monday, May 22, 2000 at 14:14:50 (ZULU) (your
host address: 208.193.197.99)
thats like buying a Doctors title, I guess everything goes if the price is right.
But who would want to buy a sniper certificate ??? a Helo Pilot licence, OK, but a sniper certificate, I mean the job sucks ! You get lonly, cold, starved, eaten up, etc. Who would want to pay for that ????
:- )
t
torsten <7.62@lasercon.de>
germany - Monday, May 22, 2000 at 15:50:48 (ZULU) (your host address:
62.224.19.119)
Youn'z out there that have me as: ken@aspire.net
Please change that email address to: ken@hunters.org
Ken :)
Ken <Ken@Hunters.org>
Nokesville, Va, USA - Monday, May 22, 2000 at 16:02:29 (ZULU) (your
host address: 4.3.240.234)
1) Person is a collector of military memorabilia.
For a collector, it may make sense to ask as he will probably have
a difficult time finding one. But there are reasons that you can't find
them. Would anyone who has completed the training in question even consider
it an option to sell a genuine certificate (blank or otherwise)? See reason
2 above for a BIG reason why they are scarce.
2) Person is trying to "create a background
I personally have not been there or done that (the training), but
I have too much respect for those that have to ever pretend that I did.
In this case he deserves to be used as UKD mover target. He can learn first
hand about that which he seeks to pretend.
3) He is what he claim.
Once he has proven to your satisfaction that he is truly "one of
you", help him out.
I gather that this is basically what was told to certificate seeker via e-mail.
Ken, I like the posting of the trace. The idiots out there hiding behind the "anonymity of cyberspace" have no idea how quickly they can be found, or that there is no real way to hide.
You leave footprints every where you go, mud, snow, cyberspace, etc. all it takes is someone that knows how to track you.
Sorry this is so long, but I never thought I would see something from my new career posted on this site.
Steve <hockyref@bellatlantic.net>
trying to remember how I shot awful, hand so well last year, maybe
practice more., USA - Monday, May 22, 2000 at 16:42:13 (ZULU) (your host
address: 151.201.137.57)
I have a custom Remington 700 with a McMillan A1 stock. I've found the comb is not high enough for me to get a proper sight picture in the scope. I am considering either getting a cheek rest, or getting a different stock (such as the McMillan A3 or A4). What are the pros and cons of each option?
How stable are the add-on cheek pieces? The only ones I know of are from Blackhawk, and they have two kinds: a tie-down version that has a fixed height, and another version with cinch straps but adjustable height by adding spacers. Are there other ones I should research? How much do they slip around and move on the stock, how durable are they in the field, etc.?
If I decide to get a new stock with adjustable cheek piece and length of pull, then what are the pros and cons of this option? How repeatable are the settings, how fragile are the moving pieces, etc.? How does H-S compare with McMillan? Any other considerations?
I don't get to check the Duty Roster as often as I'd like, so I'd appreciate if you'd please e-mail responses to me in addition to posting to the roster.
Thanks,
B. Melick
B. Melick <tmelick@yahoo.com>
Dallas, TX, USA - Monday, May 22, 2000 at 17:13:20 (ZULU) (your host
address: 170.97.67.7)
I have a hunting rifle (Ruger M77 MkII) with a 2 1/2 pound stock trigger. This is just right for bench work, but just a bit light for hunting, especially when wearing gloves. A 3 lb trigger would be better, and a 3 1/2 pound trigger also acceptable. Both are a far cry from the 8 lb, 2 pieces of sandpaper POS that it came with.
Strangely (or not), a 2 stage trigger can have a better trigger at a heavier weight than a single stage. I probably don't need to say why. How many people here would use a two stage trigger on a sniper rifle?
Anyway, trigger weights between 2 1/2 and 5 lbs are acceptable in my very humble opinion. A crisp 8 lb trigger is better than a 3 1/2 pound sandpaper job.
Karl
Karl <dahm0030@tc.umn.edu>
Damn Cold, Mn, USA - Monday, May 22, 2000 at 17:26:51 (ZULU) (your
host address: 134.84.148.151)
I have a question for you legitimate snipers out there. If you were to start over again courier wise knowing what you do now, would you still become a sniper? Is the calling strong enough to draw you into the field again, or would you strive for something else?
Your input is greatly appreciated.
Ryan <fly_lloyd@hotmail.com>
Kelown, British Columbia, Canada - Monday, May 22, 2000 at 19:03:09
(ZULU) (your host address: 24.65.9.152)
Sarge, if you need help in the Black Hills ammo department give me a call.
Sniper stocks, Dude it depends on what stock feels best to shoot
with. You can use an Eagle Stock Pad to raise the comb.
Mike Miller <Tactical@tacticalintervention.com>
Calif, USA - Monday, May 22, 2000 at 19:49:32 (ZULU) (your host address:
148.165.83.143)
How's this:
Student Records
United States Army Infantry Center and School
Fort Benning, Georgia 31905
Dave Liwanag <dliwanag@mgfairfax.rr.com>
USA - Monday, May 22, 2000 at 22:01:29 (ZULU) (your host address: 24.163.112.159)
Ken -- Jeez that's scary, I thought I was gloriously anonymously surfing those porn sites (LOL)
Mike - We spell Sergeant that way too! -- You guys just don't know
how to pronounce Lieutenant.
Kevin <kevmich@cadvision.com>
Canada - Monday, May 22, 2000 at 23:30:06 (ZULU) (your host address:
207.148.139.74)
Jerry
Jerry
Rice <nor-cal@worldnet.att.net>
American Canyon, CA, USA - Monday, May 22, 2000 at 23:29:40 (ZULU)
(your host address: 12.72.102.110)
I agree, and disagree with Jerry Rice (maker of very fine < .5" rifles).
Last year, two "SWAT" officers were at the local range, sighting in their new .308 PSS's with new Lupitas. They set up full face "perp" targets, and after much fuss, both shot 3" groups on the nose of the perp targets, said they were ready for "The Match!", and left.
If you want to take a hostage, go to Cheshire CT... you are perfectly safe ;)
Most LE don't have the skill to be a consistant 1/2" shooter, even
from a bench, and surely not from a "tactical position". And the price
of a 1/2" rifle is wasted on them.
In any case, where the difference would be made between 1" and 1/2"
rifle in a LE situation, they won't get a "Go" if the target is that small...
hell, they don't get "Go" when the target is standing in the open... the
politics are currently such that they don't need all the cool stuff they
have.
There is an amazing amount of self confidence built when shooting
a fine 1/2" rifle, and watching that black spot on the target stay pretty
much the same... and once you've done that, the lesser rifles just don't
do it.
But the training time, and the practice time wouldn't be covered
by most departments. The guys in my town, considered their weapons as just
so much baggage, unless they were doing traffic stops. They had no interest
in inproving shooting skills.
'lito
Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Tuesday, May 23, 2000 at 00:19:08 (ZULU) (your host address:
208.249.180.15)
And you thought the US military had it bad!!!!!
Mictac <Mictac@AOL.com>
USA - Tuesday, May 23, 2000 at 00:50:28 (ZULU) (your host address:
152.163.194.206)
"I tyake exception to your comments..."
Hey Mictac Dude... no mor badd spelen on thes syte!!
I heard about them having to say "Bang bang" on the rifle range, but didn't believe it... the worst part is:
"However, a Royal Navy spokesman says live firing is no longer necessary, and the forces have to provide value for money."
What value... as targets, while the new Rooskies teach their kids in school how to use AK's and grenades... I'll bet the Rooskies are getting "full value!!"
Hey guys... if we say "Bang bang, clang clang", at the sniper match, do we get full score for two hits, or just one?
'lito
Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Tuesday, May 23, 2000 at 01:05:45 (ZULU) (your host address:
208.249.180.15)
Now for the odd part. He says that Kreiger barrels tend to shoot BETTER after they've "seasoned" with 500 rounds or so. Any takers on this one? And with ammo, haven't tried this yet, so thought I would ask the experts if I'm gonna be wasting my time, is there a big difference in loading the bullet 10 thousandths or so off the lands and going another 40 thousandths so they fit in the mag AND feed?
Oh, and while I'm at it, does anyone have a blank SOTIC certificate I could get for under $20? JUST JOKING!!! Really cert seeker, dunno who you are, but if you're for real, hope you have lots of luck.
Kevin of the North: I'll ditto that comment to Ken. HAHA!
Bravo <Bravo762@yahoo.com>
I'm in Utah, no, really, in Utah, USA - Tuesday, May 23, 2000 at 01:25:55
(ZULU) (your host address: 209.180.85.179)
I guess ever so often - a comrade should clap his hands loudly once or twice near the ear of a nearby comrade. That way the near by comrade can shout MISSED!!! back at a 'virtual sniper'
Ken
Ken <ken@hunters.org>
Nokesville, Va, USA - Tuesday, May 23, 2000 at 02:23:20 (ZULU) (your
host address: 207.233.164.10)
I guess they're training - just how they will fight in their next
conflict...
Ken <Ken@hunters.org>
Nokesville, Va, USA - Tuesday, May 23, 2000 at 02:25:35 (ZULU) (your
host address: 207.233.164.10)
You guys just dazzle me with all this stuff!
Shootin Half minutes? Lord the worst Redneck I know can get off
a shot in less time than that
Bill Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Tuesday, May 23, 2000 at 02:29:22 (ZULU) (your host address:
209.184.248.252)
Ken...
They're practicing for the next desert war... they'll just fly over
Bagdad, and say Boom, boom, and save all that ordance money.
The way Klinton is going, we shouldn't laugh, we may be saying "Bang,
bang" soon, we've used up all the good stuff, and there's no money to replace
it (but he spent it for the kids!!)
'lito
Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Tuesday, May 23, 2000 at 02:46:09 (ZULU) (your host address:
208.249.180.15)
Kevin <kevmich@cadvision.com>
Canada - Tuesday, May 23, 2000 at 03:47:31 (ZULU) (your host address:
207.148.139.8)
Kevin we mostly call Lt's by different names. I can not say them here. You agree Mike T? By the way I here he can shoot also. I would not tick him off. I made him a cuff based on my arm and he asked for a bigger one. Modeled that one off of mt stepsons thigh(about 21")
Good night all
MikeMiller <Tactical@tacticalintervention.com>
Calif, USA - Tuesday, May 23, 2000 at 03:49:46 (ZULU) (your host address:
205.188.193.27)
The average LE, in Podunk, has little interest, and the average town council has less.
'lito
Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Tuesday, May 23, 2000 at 09:44:44 (ZULU) (your host address:
208.249.180.93)
As to what and who knows about LE Snipers. I have been doing this weekly for many years. Recently I shot a 5" group at 1000 yards from a mud puddle. I have shot many groups under .25moa (including one five shot group under .10 moa) at shorter ranges. I have gone to countless shooting events and met much better group shooters than me. Granted most of these event have taken place in Calif, but I do not think us city bread boys can do any better than the guys that grew up with rifles in trucks. When I was at the Carlos Shoot I met several PD Shooters that could best most guys on the DR antday. Autugua (Spelling?) Arms had a guy from a Fla. PD that was a very good shot. Old Dep. Dave is a fair shot and would give most of you a run for the money. Last I looked he worked in as close to Podunk as possible. Well actually Podunk is the County Seat he works in a much smaller place.
Kevin, Worl Police and Fire Games in Canada. Well dude, most of the guys that go to that are looking for a vacation. Friend of mine went whi is not a sniper, never was, and borrowed a rifle there to shoot with. Too big a hassle to get one from here into the country. Come down here and I will show you some shooters.
I know your intentions are great but LE can shoot.
MikeMiller <Tactical@tacticalintervention.com>
Calif, USA - Tuesday, May 23, 2000 at 15:20:46 (ZULU) (your host address:
205.188.197.59)
Total agreeance on getting the best rifle you can (Don't need anymore handycaps than I give myself already)
And as far as people beating me goes - hey every weekend some civie
kicks my ass and makes me relearn humility (a local LE won this weekends
service rifle)
Kevin <kevmich@cadvision.com>
Canada - Tuesday, May 23, 2000 at 15:35:16 (ZULU) (your host address:
207.148.141.163)
Jerry
Jerry
Rice <nor-cal@worldnet.att.net>
American Canyon, CA, USA - Tuesday, May 23, 2000 at 16:08:49 (ZULU)
(your host address: 12.72.192.146)
Your two cents? Yup...
I think we all agree on the need for good training, good attitude/desire, and good equipment... and the price society pays for the lack of any one of them.
Mike...
We know you're a California type, but please, this year, no Blond
ghillie suit in W.Va.!
'lito
Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Tuesday, May 23, 2000 at 16:26:28 (ZULU) (your host address:
208.249.180.8)
Kevin no flames taken. I get my but kicked by civies also. You shouls shoot High Power against the Sharks at Sac.
Pat, I quit teaching impact weapons because I had a few students gets hurt and the Admin said "Cant you teach them to fight without contact?" Enough said
Training is everything
MikeMiller <Tactical@tacticalintervention.com>
Calif, USA - Tuesday, May 23, 2000 at 20:32:27 (ZULU) (your host address:
148.165.83.143)
If you are interested contact Rusty Rossey at hardrock308@mindspring.com.
Out
Gooch <kentgooch@hotmail.com>
USA - Tuesday, May 23, 2000 at 21:48:19 (ZULU) (your host address:
129.71.17.179)
The way prices have been going up on reloading components I'm just
about ready to go to the range and shout "bang" too!!!!!
Jim D <jdekan@neosoft.com>
Humble, TX, USA - Tuesday, May 23, 2000 at 22:04:24 (ZULU) (your host
address: 209.196.109.15)
MicTac <MicTac@AOL.com>
USA - Tuesday, May 23, 2000 at 23:01:51 (ZULU) (your host address:
152.163.204.199)
MicTAc <MicTac@AOl.com>
USA - Tuesday, May 23, 2000 at 23:16:10 (ZULU) (your host address:
152.163.204.199)
--------------------------------
That is certainly one approach to the problem, but one that often
presents its own complications. First, there are any number of barrels
on the market that can be fitted to a 700 Remington with relativly little
trouble (note the
Tom Simpson <bullet@sc.rr.com>
Colatown, SC, USA - Tuesday, May 23, 2000 at 23:28:36 (ZULU) (your
host address: 129.252.167.152)
--------------------------------
That is certainly one approach to the problem, but one that often presents its own complications. First, there are any number of barrels on the market that can be fitted to a 700 Remington with relativly little trouble (note the "relativly"...I'll get back to that in a moment). These range from the fairly inexpensive such as ER Shaw barrels and the Shilen tubes that Brownells sells for under $200 all the way up to a custom-fitted Krieger or Hart. Some of the higher-end makers make "prefitted" barrels buit I note that some do not. The Winchester model 70 dosent have nearly as many "prefitted" barrels avialable on the market, though any custom barrel maker should be able to fit one of their barrels to a Winchester action with no problems. So, you can get the barrel in just about any contour you want at prices ranging from about $130 uninstalled to $600+ expertly fitted.
The question is, what do you want to do and what sort of result do you desire? If you are looking to install a "prefitted" (prethreaded and short chambered) Remington barrel yourself you can certainly tool up to do it but the action wrench and barrel vice alone can run a couple of hundred dollars, then you get to buy a chamber reamer and headspace gauges. It can easlity cost $400 to get the basic tooling, which aint that bad if you forsee doing ten+ rifles but hard to justify if you are only looking to do one. Now, that is just to torque up a mass-produced barrel to a mass-produced reciever and set the correct headspace with no tweaking. Such a combination may shoot 1/4 MOA but there are still a number of varialbles that have not been elminated and can still keep you rifle from shooting to its full potential. It can beat 1 MOA in most cases and often a fair bit better (but then so will a factory 700VS/Sendero). Beyond that, a savvy home gunsmith can manage to pull some of the basic tricks like lapping the locking lugs to fit the reciever but *realy* fitting up a high-end barrel to an action requires a good lathe and considerable skill with it to precisoon chamber the barrel and then true the action and breech end of the barrel for a perfect fit. This is of course not practical for most folks, hell not even for most gunsmiths.(I'd about kill for even a cheap Chinese lathe at this point). When the guys on this list chatter on about their 1/4 MOA tack-drivers they are generaly either talking about rifles that have had the best barrels fitted by the best armorers or they are shooting rifles that they have lucked into that have no business shooting as well as they do and they know it. Elimination of the element of chance is what costs the big money. So, what do you want to do?
-Tom
Tom Simpson <bullet@sc.rr.com>
Colatown, SC, USA - Tuesday, May 23, 2000 at 23:31:34 (ZULU) (your
host address: 129.252.167.152)
Jim <broonsma@prodigy.net>
PDX, Or., USA - Wednesday, May 24, 2000 at 01:12:20 (ZULU) (your host
address: 63.255.13.4)
I dont know too many people that can shoot as well as their guns capability in "non-benchrest" type conditions.
Out here
Gooch <kentgooch@hotmail.com>
USA - Wednesday, May 24, 2000 at 02:53:44 (ZULU) (your host address:
129.71.17.168)
Steve, wrong you are. I dont care what some guy wrote. A 1moa shooter plus a 1moa rifle equal an extreme spread of 2moa. That is what matters. You add the varibles and get to the extreme spread. We dont subtract for bullet diameter or holding our breath.
Pablito, I read your post again and I must say it is not your usual style. I would like to know how many LE Shooters you have shot againstor trained to get the idea we can not shoot. I know I can and that I am far from the exception. I played the Carlos Match back in my mind and LE did well. I remember being in the class shoot off and having Rusty take it from me after about thirty minutes, I believe third was a LE guy, man I wish I could remember his name. He was the real deal. I shot the actual match and did poorly by my standards and still managed a third individual. Most comps were either Mil or Civies. LE did well. I have also played the last twenty years back and have not found LE Snipers to be bad shots. A few have been fair but most are truly good for the 100-300 yard stuff. We limit them to about 200 for liabilty reasons and the fact that in most cases we can get closer. Why take a shot in your yard from the next town if you dont have to. Just because we shoot up close does not mean we can not shoot from a distance. Don't confuse that. I know your comments were not directed at me but we are a brotherhood and I take pride in my brothers. This is not to harp on you.
Mike T. Good guys had a few flaws I wont go into on an open board. One thing for sure is it was not an easy shot. Many guys can shoot small groups but when the poop hits the fan the groups go to poop on most.
I remeber a friend who was a hell of a pistol shot. He got into a shoot out in the middle of the street. Rounds going every where. Weapons smoking and when it was all over the only thing killed was an car 20 yards out of the way. No one here knows what you will do until the stuff flies.
Been shot did not like it. Had my patrol car shot. Not fun. Been cut about the same feeling. Not good. Seen guys shot with pistols did not work and had to knock one down after he had three rounds in him . Really did not like that one. Never shot anyone with my sniper rifle. Hope I dont have to and if I do I hope you guys dont find fault with my shooting. Hell of a responsibilty anyone that thinks we LE can not shoot want it?
Undude
MikeMiller <Tactical@tacticalintervention.com>
Calif, USA - Wednesday, May 24, 2000 at 04:23:07 (ZULU) (your host
address: 205.188.200.56)
Mike don't forget ammo - sometime we tend to handicap ourselves further
than we have to...Opened my eyes to that (again) shooting issue SS109 stuff
(C77) then went to 77gr HSM - Same with 175gr .308 in the GM2 -compared
to some other offerings.
Better ammo with better gun make me look better (or at least cuts
out my excuses)
Have a good'er
Kevin <kevmich@cadvision.com>
Canada - Wednesday, May 24, 2000 at 05:35:03 (ZULU) (your host address:
207.148.136.124)
Wow! Well said! It is kinda tough to follow up on a thread after
your last message!
I know you are doing it to help humanity, cause they sure don't
pay you enough for all that you do!
Thanks for reminding us that it is a little different going up against
bad guys than opening up the trunk and sitting down at the bench and squeezing
off a couple of rounds at a non-moving paper target!
Michael
Michael <mike1000@pacbell.net>
San Jose, CA, USA - Wednesday, May 24, 2000 at 05:41:43 (ZULU) (your
host address: 63.192.208.6)
In regard to the LEO's shooting abilities I am compelled to comment. I found that most (not all) of the "snipers" in my county, well, suck to be kind. I must admit there are a few who are excellent at what they do. The sniper unit I spend most of my time around has all the high speed stuff you can think of and on any given day are lucky to keep a 2" group at the 100 yd line using .5 MOA capable rifles. I don't even want to talk about a cold bore shot or the fact they have no dope past the 100 yd line. I often out shoot them with my iron sights and when I use my 700 PSS no competition.
I have come to the conclusion that they have read too much Guns and Ammo stuff and believe their own propaganda. Trust me if you're taken hostage here stike a deal with the bad guy...or else. A quick test of a LEO sniper is to mention the longest firing range in area (over 100 yds)and see what their response is. If it's "where's that"? you have you answer.
OK, I'm off my soap box and thanks for any input on the 300 loads.
joe <spojoehpd@aol.com>
san diego, ca, USA - Wednesday, May 24, 2000 at 09:40:50 (ZULU) (your
host address: 207.215.153.180)
Bill Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Wednesday, May 24, 2000 at 12:30:12 (ZULU) (your host address:
209.184.248.252)
And equipment too, though I imagine this is less of a problem than personel: you cant order qualified shooter through the mail. :)
Saw a "sniper" rifle that a small town force here in SC turned in
on trade to a local LE distributor last year: a wooden stocked 700 Varmint
in .223 with a 3-9X VariX-II in Weaver mounts. Not exacly the latest and
greatest. At least they *finaly* did get rid of it.
-Tom
Tom Simpson <bullet@sc.rr.com>
Columbia, SC, USA - Wednesday, May 24, 2000 at 14:20:48 (ZULU) (your
host address: 24.31.204.125)
I remember when I first started at this, San Jose would take the new MERGE Guys and assign them to the sniper rifles. If they could shoot well, they stayed. If not straight back to Patrol. Seemed harsh then. Seems great now.
I shoot in the Police Olympics, well Police and Fire now, when ever the games are in No. Calif. They HP scores have many guys 470 and above in both Service and Match Rifle Classes, on a 500 point course of fire. On a real 600 yard range. The scores about the same as the Regional Championships that all can compete in. What that proves? Hell I dont know. Maybe no one can shoot.
I have shot a few of the Police Sniper Matches in my time. The matches tend to be geared toward the shorter ranges, but the last one I went to over 100 snipers were there. I can tell you I was impressed by the groups turned in. The only shooting abilities I noticed were that most did not know how to use a sling. That is not just LE though as many schools dont teach sling shooting. As I said before LE is great at groups and overall not great at wind reading. Given some time on a longer course a good group shooter can learn wind and trajectory. Mechanics of shooting are the same all that is needed is doing the math. I dont know where anyone gets the idea that this shooting thing is that hard and we are magical for being able to do this. If you can make change and pick your nose with your trigger finger you can learn to shoot! The trick is not to mind F... yourself into thinking you can not do it.
Undude
MikeMiller <Tactical@tacticalintervention.com>
Calif, USA - Wednesday, May 24, 2000 at 14:34:49 (ZULU) (your host
address: 152.163.213.71)
GREAT POINTS from everybody,on shooter skill and equipment!
I guess it starts with the foundation (learning fundamental skills), gets the exterior walls(LOTS & lotsa practice), gets a roof( additional training-MORE PRACTICE!), AND finally the interior ( reloading and rifle fine tuning).
OH-MY-GAWD sounds like building a house, or eight!
GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!
CHAO!
PS I just got another "Expert" certificate ( with that gold stickee
thingee in corner)in the mail from work, FOR SALE - cheap! :-)
peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
BIG CITY, BY-GAWD, USA - Wednesday, May 24, 2000 at 17:48:48 (ZULU)
(your host address: 205.188.197.41)
Ken <msplegis3@qis.net>
USA - Wednesday, May 24, 2000 at 18:21:09 (ZULU) (your host address:
209.150.97.153)
Jerry - gun is disappearing into the great vortex knows as the Can-US
border - if all else fails tomorrow I am going over to bust some heads.
NAFTA my ass!
Kevin <kevmich@cadvision.com>
Canada - Wednesday, May 24, 2000 at 22:54:23 (ZULU) (your host address:
207.148.147.173)
Also went into Lyman's loading manual and plotted every common cal
on a sheet of paper in a 10 mph wind with the average velocities of all
the max loads printed for a given caliber. The range was 500 yards as I
remember it and we just drew on paper where the bullet should hit.
Winner .300 Weatherby Magnum 2nd Place .300 win mag. Worst .222
and next .223. (didn't do crap stuff just reasonable cartridges)/ Just
somethin to do on a Windy Day. Plot the Hottest one you can think of in
the upper right hand corner (left 10mph wind). See how many are off the
paper wind or elevation. Then notice how close together they all are after
all at 500 yards. Do a 1000 if you have a large sheet of paper. Physics
majors can skip this.. it's for Redneck Snipers only.
Bill Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Thursday, May 25, 2000 at 01:00:38 (ZULU) (your host address:
209.184.248.252)
As to my first grade schooling, I learned enough not to call anyone a "Chinaman" Damm dude get in this decade! Insult me all you want but get a grip. How would you like it if some one called you a wanna bee? I have no idea if you are the best trained sniper in the world and am not tring to insult you. I just get chaffed when someone quotes something from something they read and can not even explain it in detail. God I hate Peterson Publishing for all the crap they print.
By the way I won a grand the last time to Las Vegas. I also live about 700 miles away from it. Well 700 by the map. What does that figure out to in your math?
If someone figured that the averages figure to 1.5 MOA in the above
equation, wow I am impressed. I just go with what the guys shoot.
MikeMiller <Tactical@tacticalintervention.com>
Calif, USA - Thursday, May 25, 2000 at 01:36:05 (ZULU) (your host address:
205.188.196.58)
Scenario: guy calls McMillan and orders a M3A stock, with adjustable saddle type cheek piece, adjustable length of pull, for the M1A (NO AUTO CUTS!) in desert cammo, with an extra sling stud set up for a bipod. FOUR MONTHS LATER, no luck, even though he was told "6 to 8 weeks delivery". Many calls later he's put "ahead of the line" by a rather nice gent, can't recall his name at the second, on the production line. Some weeks later, this guy is sweating because he NEEDS that rifle for a class given by some cool guys. McMillan says they will ship straight to the gunsmith to cut some time off, so our hero ships out the metal. About a month goes by, and now I get my rifle back from the smith. WRONG FRIGGIN STOCK!!! It's a M3A, in desert, so my smith assumed it was right. No adjustable cheek piece. Can you say UUUGGHGHGH!!!!???? The cheek weld (for me, I know it's a very subjective thing) is IDEAL for the iron sights, sucks rocks for the scope. Not quite as bad as using a scope with their M1A stock, but ALMOST! Now this stock is EXPERTLY bedded, and WAY cool. But I'm totally screwed for cheek weld on this class, and, of course, really pissed about it. And of course, I paid extra for the adjustable cheek piece that I didn't get.
Anyone out there got some good encouraging words for those who wanna do battle with McMillan? I know, gotta keep it moderately civil, gonna want more stocks from them in the future. But you can bet your favorite trigger spanker that I'm sure the hell gonna INSPECT any more stocks before it's used!
Guess we'll see how much "customer satisfaction" means to McMillan!
Bravo <Bravo762@yahoo.com>
Virtually complete in my bummedness, at least I'm in the, USA - Thursday,
May 25, 2000 at 02:20:56 (ZULU) (your host address: 209.180.85.183)
I have done business with McMillan a couple of times in the past.
Never a hint of a problem. The second time I ordered a stock they told
me 6-7 weeks to get it done, but they called two weeks later, and said
someone had ordered one just mine, cancelled their order,
and would I like that one? They always had time to answer my questions
about their products. Their stocks are very durable to say the least. I
will likely order from them again.
Hope it works out for you.
Bill B <dc8plumber@aol.com>
ky, USA - Thursday, May 25, 2000 at 02:56:20 (ZULU) (your host address:
152.163.197.206)
I don't know anyone here (except for some lurkers), in a face to face way - but that doesn't give me a right to degrade or insult (less I end up on the wrong end of someone who can shoot like Mike [tee hee])
If I goof a post - I expect to be told, and corrected not insulted.
We could trade insult for hours -- but hey thats what Ex-wives are for.
--Jerry thanks for the quick call, and for all the customer service - Postal and Custom entities can swallow anything, the trick is getting it out of the belly of the beast w/o putting your head in its mouth as well.
Kevin now hops off soap box, and offers it to the next waiting windbag
Kevin <kevmich@cadvision.com>
Canada - Thursday, May 25, 2000 at 03:22:53 (ZULU) (your host address:
207.148.141.203)
I don't think that statemnet is true and said so.
A variable with an extreme spread of 1 MOA, + another varaible with
an extreme spread of 1 MOA does not yield a result of 2 MOA, (well almost
never.)
The textbook formula is V1 (squared) + V2 (squared) = sum (squared)
Find the square root of the sum and you will have the answer.
By the way, Bravo, you can add as many variables as you like, it
is not limited to two. Mike only mentioned two so thats all I dealt with.
Now, Mike you are talking about performing a worst case sensitivity analysis. Smoke and mirrors? That is properly done with standard deviations of the variables involved, not extreme spreads.
Now that I have shared the formula, (you can find it it any good math book), will you share yours on how you came up with a 3 or 4 Moa difference (6 t0 8 inches) at 200 yards that you mentioned above? It sounds a little like crap at first glance to me.
I know exactly what you mean about flukes.
Who was that guy who had the ND at the Carlos Shoot during the stalking
phase last year? Was he LE? If so, I wonder how many sub 1/2 MOA groups
he had to fire to bring his 1/2 MOA average back up after that little BOO
BOO?
Steve <nato@bright.net>
S.C.D.H., Ohio, USA - Thursday, May 25, 2000 at 03:37:36 (ZULU) (your
host address: 205.212.148.121)
W.B. Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Thursday, May 25, 2000 at 04:21:19 (ZULU) (your host address:
209.184.248.252)
Bill no problem with the cheap shot.
Mike Miller <Tactical@tacticalintervention.com>
Calif, USA - Thursday, May 25, 2000 at 04:33:52 (ZULU) (your host address:
205.188.196.21)
Any ideas on how to lighten my ghillie - it was made to Ontario specs. more of a decidious (non-conifers i.e. trees that loose leaves - too last to get spell check or a dictionary) forest look and now I'm here in Alberta most of our terrain is grassland. Any paints or dyes that won't lump or leave some sort of nasty, noxious residue (or make me more of a fire hazard) -- or am I stuck, and should save it for the woods and create another? Unfurled it last week and realised my fat ass was even more obvious, in it, here.
Mike - two types of people, those who have had a ND, and those who probably will while laughing at the first. Truth: there's a Mike Miller in the 1 PPCLI recce pl who is famous for ND's w/ Artic mitts (x3 in one day -not blanks) - should I say which one I was, while laughing at him:)
Anyway off to bed - need my rest to go throttle my Rice rifle out
of Canada Customs or the Postal clowns tomorrow
Kevin <kevmich@cadvision.com>
Canada - Thursday, May 25, 2000 at 04:57:05 (ZULU) (your host address:
207.148.143.208)
Has anyone got any experience with the IBA accurized Remington PSS?
All opinion welcomed.
Justin
Justin <srg@q-net.net.au>
Perth, Western Australia, - Thursday, May 25, 2000 at 08:30:25 (ZULU)
(your host address: 203.91.65.250)
Just a little something to muddy up the waters on the 1 MOA shooter with a 1 MOA rifle;) Say the shooter is this Zen Monk who is in tune with the universe. He'll know when the rifle wobbles 1 MOA right, so he'll wobble 1 MOA left, and vice-versa, or he'll wobble high when rifle wobbles low, etc. Now you have repetative shots through the same hole ;) sorry, couldn't resist
RD
RD <kheldaar@lvcm.com>
Lost Wages, NV, USA - Thursday, May 25, 2000 at 10:57:26 (ZULU) (your
host address: 24.234.20.153)
Are you competing in the Sniper Rendezvous this year?????
It would be pretty cool to have you shoot that old Springfield 03'A4 in the match. Maybe we could team you up with 'Lito? :-o
Mikey, RELAX - breathe in then ouuut, theeere feel better?
peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
BIG CITY, BY-GAWD, USA - Thursday, May 25, 2000 at 11:32:23 (ZULU)
(your host address: 205.188.193.32)
I will be having a .300 Whisper type rifle made in the next couple of months and would like to discuss this with anyone who is interested.
Thanks, ZED
Zed Stewart <zhdstew@nts-online.net>
Panhandle of, Texas, USA - Thursday, May 25, 2000 at 13:47:20 (ZULU)
(your host address: 216.167.131.151)
Jerry
Jerry
Rice <nor-cal@worldnet.att.net>
American Canyon, CA, USA - Thursday, May 25, 2000 at 14:34:57 (ZULU)
(your host address: 12.72.65.104)
Well back to making slings
MikeMiller <Tactical@tacticalintervention.com>
Calif, USA - Thursday, May 25, 2000 at 14:43:59 (ZULU) (your host address:
152.163.213.84)
Quickly... yes, I have instructed LE... the Yonkers, NY PD, and the Stanford CT, PD... and spent 9 years on my town's dept, as an "on call" SWO. (Got fired last summer when the Democrats got in!)... and have shot against them, and with very few exceptions, they were poor.
I have found that some LE are very dedicated, but many are just getting
by. But... at the same time, I'm not disagreeing with you.
You have to understand this is a regional issue. I live in the northeast.
In the NY city PD, 99+% of the officers never touched a gun, before the
came to the dept... in my area (CT), most of the officers, don't shoot
recreationally, and don't hunt, and don't own a gun, other than their service
guns.
When you talk about the LE at the Carlos match, you have to remember
that these are "driven" guys, that are spending their own money for the
match (and probably for the rifle), just to BE THERE!
I remember the little guy from Opalacha Fla, the one that had to
repeat everything 3 times so you could understand him because of his accent...
I'd hate to have him following me through the 'glades... but the officers
in my town, wouldn't want to get their shoes wet.
When I lived in Pensylvinia, every cop I knew was a shooter all his life, and hunted every season (and sometimes other times too;)... they were very comfortable with all kinds of firearms... I had a LEO over to my house here in CT, and there was a Colt .45 Gold Cup on the desk, and he asked to see it, and didn't know how to open the slide... sorry, Mike, but that's lame!
Frank Lautenberg (US senator NJ)... the author of the Gun Show bill, said what he wants, it to break the gun culture by stopping young people from learning about guns, and if he can do that, then he has won, because they will grow up not caring about guns... it's this very philosophy that I'm talking about. You get cops that didn't get exposed to guns and shooting as kids, and it just is one of the things the have to use... you take cop that grew up in rural areas, or know guns for some other reason, and they will take there shooting very seriously.
Bravo...
Call McMillen, they are very good about stuff like that. After your
course (the teacher is the one in the Blonde Ghillie suit), send it back
to them, and they will either install the cheekpiece, or replace the stock,
and bed it for you, and they do beau-damn-dations bedding!
Mean while, stop spanking that Monk... er, trigger!
COSINE COSINE COSINE!... to you too!!
PereR...
Does the survivor get to keep the Springfield '03-A4?? ;)... if
not, no thanks!
'lito
Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Thursday, May 25, 2000 at 15:57:02 (ZULU) (your host address:
208.249.180.83)
The Shooter <kkonen@usa.net>
God Bless Texas, USA - Thursday, May 25, 2000 at 16:04:59 (ZULU) (your
host address: 208.180.3.247)
I am going to jump all the way back to the top of the roster to comment on a question posed by Pete Robertson. Pete, you asked about the SS10x42. With over 120 moa of adjustment (or looked at another way, over 60 moa from mecanical zero in either direction) you can just leave the thing in a normal mount and still get out past 1000 yards. Your exercise in a canted mount seems a bit pointless and unecessarily expensive with this particular scope. With a .308 rifle the most you'll need above your 100 yards zero is around 42 minutes to 45 minutes to get to 1000 yards. In other words, just mount the scope and enjoy.
I guess I chose to comment on this question because I just finished up the updated review for the Tasco line of sniper scopes now marketed exclusively by SWFA. Guys, if you can not afford a $600+ scope and like fixed power, this scope series really is a value. And before any na-sayers poo-poo it, keep in mind it is build by a subcontractor to government specs, not by Tasco themselves. Then of course the fact that is actually won a gov'mint contract doesn't hurts its rep either...
Another comment at the top of the roster got me to smile. Rich B's commentary on sniper & TOW gunners. It brought back some fond memories of me in my younger and crazier days. He outlines well the thoughts that went through my mind when as a TOW gunner in the MDARNG I had a rifle custom built just for this purpose. MY intent was to keep it in the TOW vehicle for a rainy day if we were ever deployed. Kind of funny looking back on it now...but when you learn that a sabot from a T-72 can travel at over 5,000fps and your large signature TOW takes 17 SECONDS to get to max range, you sort come up with these novel ideas! Anyway, it was a fun project and I would most likely have gotten grief for trying to take it along but as a hard core shooting enthusiast at 26, I didn't stop to think about the fact that the real snipers could have done the chore for us.
And finally, for those of you who care, it looks like the PX will
be back up soon. I'll be taking plastic this time so if you are about to
toss some money at tactical gear, wait a week or two and see if the prices
suit you!
Scott <xring@voicenet.com>
USA - Thursday, May 25, 2000 at 16:18:01 (ZULU) (your host address:
192.91.146.34)
Jerry - Yep I'm happier than a Pig in S**T, figure I'll go camp-out
at the gunshop till it arrives.
Kevin <kevmich@cadvision.com>
Canada - Thursday, May 25, 2000 at 16:18:07 (ZULU) (your host address:
207.148.136.134)
I have been wacthing and reading your comments for about 6 months
or so and have learned a ton of great stuff.I am not LE or Mil,just
a long range hunter and shooting buff.I wanted to comment on Bravo's
problem with McMillan.About a year ago i ordered one of their rifles
and was told i had a 6 month wait.When the dealer called to tell
me that my gun was in i dropped everything. My gun was 6 weeks early.It
is exactly what i ordered as well.Ron did a great job.To all that are looking
to get a long-range rifle this is the one to get. My gun is a 338-378 Weatherby.
I get .4" groups with the 300gr MK and over 3700fps and .6" with the 180gr
Nosler BT! The reason i ordered this gun was i got tired of chasing elk.
Sorry for the long post.Keep up the great workand keep your powder dry.
MSK
MSK <michaels.keith@att.net>
USA - Thursday, May 25, 2000 at 18:02:33 (ZULU) (your host address:
12.73.161.110)
Kevin, no excuse here. Tape sounds like a good idea. I will use that next time
Shot Group/MOA thing: I have gotten a few emails asking for a detailed explanation of this. What Steve and several other are talking about is the classic Bench Rest Explanation of MOA. They take the overall size of a group and minus the diameter of the bullet. That gets you the group size in Bench Rest terms.
In Precision HRT type work I ang others plan for the extremes. When I talk of a shooter capable of 1MOA I mean a shooter that will shoot a 1MOA group no more than 1MOA at the extreme edge from the point of aim. Now that does not factor the rifles capabilties. That is just the shooter. So if he/she makes a 1MOA mistake right in aiming the group will start at the 1MOA mistake and open from there.
Now that the shooter has already made a 1MOA mistake we have to look at the rifle. A rifle that is capable of only 1MOA will be added to the shooters error. So we take the 1moa mistake and add the 1moa group to it. Lets say in the worst case the shooter shoots 1moa to the right and the rifles opens up to the right 1MOA, the group will now have the extreme edge round 2moa to the right. That is how I look at it. If I am giving the shooter permission to shoot I know we have to have a 2moa clear area to avoid hitting a hostage.
Now in another case the shooter can make the 1moa mistake to the right and the gun can open up 1moa to the left and we would be dead center by a fluke.
The classic Bench Rest way of looking at this does not work in real world. I am asking for you to except a Pardigm shift here. Bench Resters all but take out the human aspect of this. We can not do that.
I hope I have been able to explain things with my limited first grade education so all can understand. Bottom line is get as good a rifle as you can afford if you do it for real. The better the shooter the less you need the great rifle.
Undude/Mike
MikeMiller <Tactical@tacticalintervention.com>
Calif, USA - Thursday, May 25, 2000 at 18:12:45 (ZULU) (your host address:
205.188.196.44)
I think there is a problem of definitions. By your last post, a 1MOA shooter will actually shoot groups no larger than 2 MOA across. That is, a 1MOA right and a 1 MOA left. When added to the 1 MOA rifle, MEASURED THE SAME WAY, you do get a combinations that will shoot 2 MOA left and 2 MOA right, for a 4 MOA group.
Mathematically, if we use extreme spread as a measure of group size, a 1 MOA shooter and rifle will group into 2 MOA. If the shooter wobbles right to the maximum 0.5 MOA, there is an even chance that the rifle shoots right also 0.5 MOA, for a 1 MOA deviation from center. An equal wobble left will yield a 2 MOA group.
When talking about averages and standard deviations, it gets much more complicated. The average of the combination is going to be a combination of factors with a nasty equation including the averages and standard deviations of both rifle and shooter. In essence, for reasonable numbers, the average of the combination will be about 1.5 times the average of the shooter and rifle, if both are the same.
THE ABOVE IS A GROSSLY SIMPLIFIED EXPLANATION.
We can go into the gory details, but why bother. Mathematically, Steve is correct. In real life, what Mike said always seems to happen. Personally, I think a poor shooter with a good gun can improve, a good shooter with a poor gun can't. At least 30% of the people at public ranges would be better served by spending $200 on ammunition than on their rifle.
Karl (who couldn't resist sticking his nose in)
Karl <dahm0030@tc.umn.edu>
Damn Cold, Mn, USA - Thursday, May 25, 2000 at 19:13:39 (ZULU) (your
host address: 134.84.148.151)
Let us assume that a 1 moa rifle or shooter keeps 95% of the shots within a .5 moa radius of a point. A normal distribution says that 95% of shots occur within 2 standard deviations (SD) of the true value, for our purposes, the point of aim. This means that a 1 moa rifle has a SD of 0.25 moa. To determine the SD of a sum of two variables, use the equation SD(1+2)=square root (SD(1)^2+SD(2)^2). So our rifle/shooter combination gives us a SD of .353 moa. The radius of our 95% group is then .706 moa. This translates into a group size of 1.412 moa.
Mike's example that if the shooter jerks the bullet to the right 1 moa and the rifle pulls the bullet to the right 1 moa, is just as likely as jerking the bullet to the right 1 moa and the rifle pulling to left 1 moa resulting in no error. The theory says that both of these extreme cases are impossible and that is why 1 + 1 does not equal two in the theoretical sense.
Remember this is standard probability theory and does not necesarily translate into real life. Since we are dealing with Mr. Murphy and lives are at stake in most, if not all, real life scenarios, I think Mike's method is more accurate under field conditions when lives are on the line.
The Shooter <kkonen@usa.net>
God Bless Texas, USA - Thursday, May 25, 2000 at 20:12:17 (ZULU) (your
host address: 208.180.2.60)
We all know that California Blonds have more fun... even with bullet holes in them, and pins in their legs ;)
Ken "Chainsaw" Hunter, and I were the only team to get off both shots on the stalk, and not be seen. We shot Rick B. as I recall, and ate thorns like you.
Zed...
If, by "Wets" you mean wetbacks, or Spanish, you might walk lightly
on that one, Cowboy... there are a few "Wets' on this site, and if you
go to the sniper match in September, you will be shooting against a few
"Wets"... can you spell "AD", or F-R-A-G-G-E-D...
On the 1-moa statistics...
I'm gonna stick up for the UnDude on this one... not because the
math was right, (cuz it isn't, but he's a California Blond, so it doesn't
have to be:)... but what he was talking was a reasonable concept. In optics,
we call it the "Reciprocal of the sum of the Reciprocals"... and it does
the same thing... but what Mike was talking ABOUT needed a bit more thought...
like missing the forrest for the leaves.
Jeez, I hate to defend him... the bum outshoots me all the time
;(
'lito
Pablito <condor@mags.net>
Drying my back off, after that long swim across the Rio, USA - Thursday,
May 25, 2000 at 23:18:04 (ZULU) (your host address: 208.249.180.13)
If you read my much too long post re the the Alabama sniper shot and the bullet direction change one in the target......anybody got a real explanation for why it did that?
BTW- no comparisons to the M-16 bullet hitting an arm and tumbling through the body and coming out the foot stories allowed....
Seriously-thanks if you got a good theory.
Mictac <Mictac@aol.com>
USA - Thursday, May 25, 2000 at 23:32:22 (ZULU) (your host address:
205.188.192.32)
Now whadda we got? Strap-ons, spanking, bucking, and MOA anal retentives? WET WHAT?!?! Go pull that crap on executive parkway in El Paso! See how it feels to look NORTH and see that barbed fence!
Now, one of you good geography types give me the mileage to Storm
from here. Gotta figure out how many gallons of coffee would be needed
to spend vacation there. After all, I got a lot of IOU's to make good on!
Bravo <Bravo762@yahoo.com>
just a scoche north of Vegas on '15, YOO-TAHHH, USA - Thursday, May
25, 2000 at 23:41:18 (ZULU) (your host address: 209.180.85.222)
Bullets change direction all the time. Deflection into the area of least resistance. I shot through some live twigs about the same size as a pencil. I put a 36" square piece of cardboard with a 3" paster on it behind the twigs. Hit the twigs several times with varying results each time. There was deflection each time, but in different amounts. Rifle was 308 168 matchkings, distance 200yds. Some of the shots were defected about 18". The target was 6ft behind the brush.
Best Regards,
Bill B <dc8plumber@aol.com>
ky, USA - Thursday, May 25, 2000 at 23:47:04 (ZULU) (your host address:
205.188.193.179)
Hi guys just got back and have a blazing headache. Need beer obviously! Got to go befroe I explode!
Rick
Rick <rbowcher@aol.com>
Fayetteville, NC, USA - Friday, May 26, 2000 at 00:45:49 (ZULU) (your
host address: 152.163.206.196)
I had an opportunity to chat briefly with some Shepherd reps at the
NRA convention...they said that they had recently dropped Hakko as their
OEM for their scopes...too many fubared ones that had to go back. They
claim that any such problems will be reduced in the future. So apprently
they did put out some junk. Not quite what you asked, but I hope it helps.
-Tom
Tom Simpson <bullet@sc.rr.com>
Colatown, SC, USA - Friday, May 26, 2000 at 02:58:36 (ZULU) (your host
address: 24.31.204.125)
I would also be interested in trading e-mails with anyone who is planning on attending the Operational Tactics Advanced School in Baker City next month. Are there any of Stu's disciples out there?
Has anyone worked with Universal Trackers here in the NW? I'm looking
for some honest feedback. Thanks.
SSG Maries/2-162 INF/ORARNG <kmaries@proaxis.com>
Oregon, USA - Friday, May 26, 2000 at 03:11:55 (ZULU) (your host address:
206.163.142.12)
Bottom line..the story you mentioned is somewhat believable...although 90 degree turns on .308 HPBT projectiles seem to be pretty darn rare...are you sure those are the EXACT circumstances. I've been at a few "jobs" where the facts that hit the reports did not exactly jive with what really happened. The press usually takes it from there and makes up whatever they want...they ALWAYS get it wrong.
On another note - to the newbies on this forum (sespecially those
who think broad prejudice needs to be shared).. a word of advice. Stop
writing and start reading... the regulars (not me) on this forum have invested
a significant amount of "life" time to be able to contribute value on a
consistant basis in this very finite field. The people you want to emulate
are the ones that silently read this forum every day and learn,learn, learn.
When a topic comes up that you have real value to contribute, chime in.
Jim MItchell <james_mitchell@merck.com>
NJ, USA - Friday, May 26, 2000 at 12:39:05 (ZULU) (your host address:
12.20.190.1)
Bill R,
Your story reminds me of a match in Wyoming a few years ago when
part of our gun club went out to a multigun shoot (Rifle,pistol,shotgun)
and a couple of the guys came back and told the story about a rancher who
came out and shot the long range rife match with his beat up old 30-06
with a 6x Weaver scope. They all kindof chuckeld at him about being "Out
Gunned and out classed" but it seems someone forgot to tell him because
when the smoke all cleared he took the top gun prize and went home leaving
a bunch of "Hot Dogs" talking to themselves(HA). My dad used to have a
saying, "Beware of the man with one gun".
Pat <mrbullet@hotmail.com>
USA - Friday, May 26, 2000 at 13:19:36 (ZULU) (your host address: 207.41.18.130)
Some years ago, I tested a truck load of .223M for Federal in a machine rest at 500 yards. Initially it was anything but up to the standard set by the wonderful .308M. At that time, the powder was non-canister WC-749.
After much urging (and probably necessity) the powder was changed to VV N-140 or 540 (I forget which and am not close to the records). The rate would have been in the 25.8 grain area for either. This was excellent ammunition. I have since lost my contacts at FCC and don't know which powder they currently use fo .223M.
You can't go wrong with the 25.8 grain load of N-140/540 with the
69 Sierra. Start below that level and work up. For me it worked in any
temperature. Your experience might be entirely different.
Bill Wylde <k9wxr@rr1.net>
Cloudy, IL, USA - Friday, May 26, 2000 at 14:35:03 (ZULU) (your host
address: 216.189.22.83)
I will clarify my comments on wets, just for your pleasure.
A wet back is a person who crosses the Rio Grande sans legal means, papers, etc. In other words, illegaly. They are also called illegal aliens. Wet is more of a technical term and not a racial one. My Mexican friends in town did not like them coming over, either. They carry things that range from deer corn (to eat) to guns and drugs. They will move in groups ranging in size from one to 15, usually. If you run into a bad group you had better be well armed.
I personally took two to town, at gun point, for the border patrol to take back to Mexico. One was "bayed" by my dogs on a fence post. He was not exited about going home.
Now for all who think that I am a _________ (I will let you fill in the blank), I only did my duty as an American citizen by turning them in. It is not a fun or easy thing to do but it is my duty. For all of you who are American citizens, reguardless of heritage, ease up. People are people everywhere you go.
You will find that I say exactly what I mean and mean what I say. I very rarely mispeak. I meant to offend no one. I am not in the habit of using racial slures. There are to many other relevent things use against someone who deserves it. Racial remarks are for small minded poeple. I thought that everyone here was a grown up.
I WILL NOT apologies for anything that I said so if you are looking
for one you are out of luck.
Zed Stewart <zhdstew@nts-online.net>
Panhandle of, Texas, USA - Friday, May 26, 2000 at 15:04:26 (ZULU)
(your host address: 216.167.136.84)
Being a Canadian (generally more polite than you uncouth Americans
-tee hee) I try to call a spade a spade. I think your wet comments are
RTFO (Right the F*** Out-of-er) If you mean to say illegal immigrants say
it - a lot of asian illegals come across the mexican border (if you knew
anything about crime) so don't use a wide brush - just makes you look like
an idiot. Same as any other racially derived catchism. Don't look at his/her
color, look at their actions. I am WASP, you don't see me slagging other
differing groups. You think Mike, Rick, 'lito, and Sinister Dave bring
that crap here, no way. I'm not being PC just accurate. If you got hate
to spew go do it somewhere else.
Kevin <kevmich@cadvision.com>
Canada - Friday, May 26, 2000 at 16:07:21 (ZULU) (your host address:
207.148.132.43)
As far as what deflected the bullet, I would assume that it would take a bone to deflect it. Possibly the mushrooming of the bullet changed the angle that would be required to get a deflection.
The Shooter <kkonen@usa.net>
God Bless Texas, USA - Friday, May 26, 2000 at 19:05:32 (ZULU) (your
host address: 208.180.4.138)
Bullet enters body through right rib cage, strikes prominent portion of spine, deflection to the right of the somewhat round, hard object,it then transects bad guy's heart, exiting chest and striking victim's spine.
sound possible?
Jim Mitchell <james_mitchell@merck.com>
NJ, USA - Friday, May 26, 2000 at 19:50:05 (ZULU) (your host address:
12.20.190.1)
Bill Wylde, great to see you here. Hows business?
Pablito you agreed with me. Damm next Bill Rodgers will agree with you and life will be complete.LOL
Rick, drink a beer for me.
Bruce Evans well said. Glad to see you back here. email me your address
again. Lost it like half my brain.
MikeMiller <Tactical@tacticalintervention.com>
Calif, USA - Friday, May 26, 2000 at 21:14:47 (ZULU) (your host address:
152.163.201.198)
I'm going to purchase one of the competition die sets with micrometer seater. I've narrowed it down to either Redding or Forster/Bonanza.
Any thoughts or preferences you'd like to share?
Danny
Danny Reever <dreever@supernet.com>
Arendtsville, Pa, USA - Friday, May 26, 2000 at 22:04:34 (ZULU) (your
host address: 64.41.35.251)
You say the round fired by the Sniper was a .270 soft point? Hell, I was trying figure why the Federal .308 Match round deflected, because they usually just blow apart when they hit tissue/bone. Most hunting rounds are designed to stay together. There is some new stuff available for LE that is frangible and wont even exit from a head shot. Wish that Sniper could have had some of that stuff.
Later,
Bill B <dc8plumber@aol.com>
ky, USA - Friday, May 26, 2000 at 22:06:29 (ZULU) (your host address:
205.188.197.54)
I own both the Redding Comp seater, and the Forster Comp seater,
and they are both outstanding, and are probably the best of the standard
press seaters. The Forester is larger, and the numbers are easier to read,
and it's also cheaper... but you can't go wrong with either.
The chambers are an "air guage" fit.
UnDude...
B. Rogers agree with me... that ol' 'yote bate don't agree with
anybody on purpose;)) He even argues with his self when he shaves in the
morning:))
Zed...
You have made quite an impression on the members of this site.
Nice entrance fella'...
... you really know how to impress the locals.
I'm at a (very rare) loss for words, at your lack of cool!
'lito
Pablito <condor@mags.net>
Sunnin' myself on the south bank of the Rio, lookin' for my swim suit.,
USA - Friday, May 26, 2000 at 22:35:01 (ZULU) (your host address: 208.249.180.108)
I'd bet it slowed down through a rib, bounced off the body of a vertebra and then exited between ribs in front. Then I expect it struck the unfortunate hostage between two vertebrae at an upward angle.
At least that would be the most direct route with the least resistance.
Chris <cmw@tiac.net>
USA - Friday, May 26, 2000 at 22:54:04 (ZULU) (your host address: 205.181.148.30)
Mike M.:
I haven't been away just not taking up space.I'll send the address.
Bruce Evans <bgenlvtex@aol.com>
Texas, USA - Friday, May 26, 2000 at 23:25:21 (ZULU) (your host address:
205.188.199.43)
Mike,
You will have to try harder than that to offend me. Remember, I
grew up with the name Zed. I do not take things personally that are not
meant as a personal afront. I guess the rest of the world does not live
in South Texas.
I did not know that this site was so politically correct. I expected technically correct but not PC. Niether did I know that this site was so friendly to criminals.
As for the ND/fraggin' comment, if there was ANY comment that was
out of order that was it.
Zed Stewart <Zhdstew@nts-online.net>
Texas, USA - Friday, May 26, 2000 at 23:29:00 (ZULU) (your host address:
216.167.136.155)
Bruce Evans: you forgot one thing. The food! I'd rather eat a meal around Juarez than any other place on the planet (and I've tried several countries!). Never known anyone with the cooking talent of the Mexicans. Bet they could take three rocks, some wood, and a chile and make it a 5 star meal. Or I might just be highly biased. Sure need a for-real Mex (or even Tex-Mex!) place in this state.
Danny Reever: I've got the Redding BR seater (thanks for the recommendation Patron 'Lito!) and think the thing is GREAT! That spring loaded allignment doober is way cool, seems to work!
Back to working up loads for the new '25. And trying a beer or two
;-)
Bravo <Bravo762@yahoo.com>
The banana republic formerly known as the, USA - Saturday, May 27,
2000 at 00:20:13 (ZULU) (your host address: 209.180.85.139)
You said 'Wet' wasn't meant in an offensive way - hey man its just like 'Gook' or 'Nigger' those entire words connotations are offensive.
Hurt my feelings?, fire away!
Purolator:Those Fu***ng Clowns can't find my Rice rifle - what's to bet some greasy bastard has it in his car and is hocking it to the local scumbags' (hey I meant to show it to the Vancouver & BC RCMP ERT team but not that way)
Kevin <kevmich@cadvision.com>
madder then hell, in, Canada - Saturday, May 27, 2000 at 02:20:14 (ZULU)
(your host address: 207.148.139.146)
On torso shot deflection, I seem to 'member the .270's (if that is
what was used) are one of them thar weird length to diameter ratios and
that MAY have had something to do with it.
Shot Angle and deflection off a rib, Walkman, arm bone, or whatever
else probably further increased the reported errant path.
Terminal ballistics & shot reconstruction are REAL arcane ju-ju
best left to the likes of Spent Bullet Zen Masters like Bruce Ragsdale,
or Marty Fackler.
Bruce E, welcome back Dude!
'Lito,
SPEECHLESS!?? Golly-Dang! That is a first. How about swapping the 'A4 for the Cuttlefish Ghillie after the match?
Steve, ARE YOU COMPETING???????????
peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
BIG CITY, BY-GAWD, USA - Saturday, May 27, 2000 at 03:14:31 (ZULU)
(your host address: 205.188.196.38)
Bill Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Saturday, May 27, 2000 at 03:50:07 (ZULU) (your host address:
209.184.248.252)
I took three local readings with strong signals from five or more satellites for each location yesterday. Plugged the coordinates into Terra Server and came up with images about 15 MILES off to the West!
GPS was a GARMIN borrowed from my brother. It will give you the same coordinates if you go away and return to the same spot. So do we have a SERIOUS ERROR introduced into the satellite signal, is this GPS A POS, or are the USGS maps off by 15 miles as far as location?
I was in the market for one of these things, but this sort of reinforces
my distrust of technology (kinda scary hearing that from a programer/networker
type aint it). Give me a good ol' map and a compass any day!
Steve <hockyref@bellatlantic.net>
South West, Pa, USA - Saturday, May 27, 2000 at 04:02:29 (ZULU) (your
host address: 151.201.122.163)
2. something that would trigger a violent reaction in someone. You can not make me or anyone else with a first grade education think that you would go to the Hispanic area of any town and start calling everyone you think is an illegal alien a "Wet". You would not be welcome. You can not be that dumb.
This is not a site that caters to criminals. The way you talk is concidered disturbing the peace. I swore an oath to protect everyone from the oppressive. Change or go somewhere else! Not an insult just the way things are.
Pablito, I laugfhed so hard I almost coded when I read your last
post. Bill dont bomb me now.
MikeMiller <Tactical@tacticalintervention.com>
Calif, USA - Saturday, May 27, 2000 at 04:12:02 (ZULU) (your host address:
205.188.196.24)
Last year, after walking back to the cars from the stalking area right behind Mike and seeing how much of a struggle it was for him lugging all that stuff around, stopping to catch his breath every few steps, I realized that this sort of thing is not for me. I was having almost as much trouble myself, and I was only carrying binoculars! It must be the altitude. If this years event is just going to be a shooting match, and I could figure a way to cammo up my little red wagon, I just might. Otherwise, I'll pass. You guys have fun.
A Cuttlefish Ghille suit for a 03A1 Springfield??? NO WAY!!!
Then I really would look like a fish out of water.
To Mike,
I am still patiently waiting for your formula on how you came up
with a 3 or 4 MOA difference between those 2 rifles. Perhaps you could
just point me to the appropriate issue of Petersons Publishing CO. I could
take it from there.
Also, I was not trying to insinuate anything about your education. I called your solution a first grade answer because that is when I learned that 1 + 1 equals 2. If you learned this in college, that is OK with me.
Also, I was not trying to pass judgement on your ND. It has happened
to me also. Never in front of a witness though.
Steve <nato@bright.net>
S.C.D.H., Ohio, USA - Saturday, May 27, 2000 at 04:23:27 (ZULU) (your
host address: 205.212.148.102)
PC is being 'make me puke' courteous -but being polite is, engaging your brain before engaging your mouth.
Were going to try to put together a small Canadian contingent for your little get together at Storm - if your Draconian Gun Laws will let us import and export Firearms from our fair land. -- Assuming the Hudson's Bay Peso (CDN $) doesn't drop anymore, making your dollar unreachable.
Anyone in the Vancouver B.C. to Calgary Ab. area who comes across
a Jerry Rice Nighthawk, in a AICS, for sale please give me (and the local
TAC team) a shout.
Kevin <kevmich@cadvision.com>
Feeling Sheepish, in, Canada - Saturday, May 27, 2000 at 05:26:50 (ZULU)
(your host address: 207.148.146.194)
Too bad you aren't gonna compete, you would have a ball. AND ITS ONLY LIKE A 60 pound payload you carry all day long!
Hell, if my "skinny little weasel faced"(Thanks Depity Dave)ass can make it through with a case of the Shingles, should be a cakewalk for you!
Kevin, Bravo, or anybody else thinking about competing at The Sniper Rendezvous at Storm Mountain. GET IN SHAPE! Not an insult to anybody, just a STRONG suggestion based on my experiences. Leg work and toning upper body strength are highly reccomended!
Ccccccccccosine! I 'd rather do trim work!
Chao!
AND HAVE A SAFE HOLIDAY WEEKEND!
peteR
peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
BIG CITY, BY-GAWD, USA - Saturday, May 27, 2000 at 11:13:19 (ZULU)
(your host address: 152.163.213.68)
In California if you walk down some of the streets with the wrong
Colors on you get beat up and/or shot the way I hear it back here from
the Ret. L.A. Motorcycle officer I used to work with.
You just got to understand what offends people I rekon.
Somebody said "When in Rome... Do as the Italian's do or something
like that. I believe that was good advice.
I was up in SF while back stayin in one of those Hotels off the
Union Park and couldn't hardly sleep for listening to the Gun Fire. There
was Graffiti all around about where to call Leroy to get the Gun of your
choice anytime day or night! Never heard a Gun go off in Amarillo
in all the many days I spent there.
Wow if that Bear falls in the ocean... who's gonna miss it?
Bill Rogers <brogers@elkhart.com>
USA - Saturday, May 27, 2000 at 12:18:06 (ZULU) (your host address:
209.184.248.252)
I took a GPS fix down at Storm Mountain, and just dropped it in to Terraserver.
Lat 39d-21.75m North
Lon 079d-06.53m West
And the 1000 yd range popped right in the middle of the picture,
and I could easily see Rods house (Rod, stop that!).
The Rappel tower and "Ol' Downtown" wasn't there, as the Sat photos
were circa '95.
Did the same with my house... and it was centered (but the occupant isn't;)
I'm using a Magellan GPS-4000-XL... works fine.
Maybe Pennsylvania has it's own tectonic plate, or maybe could be
that you're using a Ga..Gar... Garm... Garmin POS-1000 ;)
Seriously... maybe the way you're entering the data... drop me an
e-mail... I have friends that use Garmins, and they're OK too.
As to Storm... Check with Rod... but last year there were a lotta looker-oners. As to seeing what the stalkin' is all about, you can't... the shooters are all invisible, except for the blond one;). But, I would sugest you come down for the pre-match sniper course, it's fun, and will harden up your soft buns.
Kevin...
Come on down to Storm... they'll let you cross the border with your
guns (tell'em you're going to Storm;)... just make sure that you list them
at the border.
'lito
Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Saturday, May 27, 2000 at 12:55:59 (ZULU) (your host address:
208.249.180.9)
Bill R, I ask you this about Free Speech. Do you support it when it causes damage? I mean how do you feel when someone burns a flag? That on burns me up. Yes we are all shooters in here and by God I can not stand the idea that any group would be talked about as any term that is not kind. "United we stand divided we fall"
As to what constitutes a crime. Anything that targets one group for hate, based on Race, religion, or sexual orientation is concidered to be a hate crime in the US. Even in Texas. Generally we associate this type of crime with violence but it can be applied in much broder terms. We have people from all walks of life on here. We should treat everyone the same.
Maybe I am infected by living in California, but from where I stand I will take the infection over what is being offered by others. Heck I have to have had some contact with a person before I decide what to call them.
Pablito, I guess its my turn for Bill to disagree with.
Undude
MikeMiller <Tactical@tacticalintervention.com>
Calif, USA - Saturday, May 27, 2000 at 14:15:34 (ZULU) (your host address:
148.165.83.143)
One more thing Paragraph breaks so my eyes dont cross reading it.
mikemiller <tactical@tacticalintervention.com>
Calif, USA - Saturday, May 27, 2000 at 16:41:33 (ZULU) (your host address:
148.165.83.143)
Bill, Pablito and the rest. Something we can all agree on. I read all the postsand we as a whole are not typists. God I need spell check on here. Lets lighten it up.
Bring on shooting sunjects. I am ready.
Undude/Mike/ND Guy?
MikeMiller <Tactical@tacticalintervention.com>
Calif, USA - Saturday, May 27, 2000 at 17:18:24 (ZULU) (your host address:
148.165.83.143)
Bravo...you are right on target (1/2 MOA) w/ your analysis of Mexican food. Gotta have it at least once a week and I don't mean Taco Bell. I'm still looking for substitute asbestos shorts. Since the EPA banned asbestos I am at a loss to reduce scorched boxers!
Kev...Draconian gun laws? I argee, it's getting close but you should be more worried about getting your own guns BACK into Canada. Back in the late 70's I planned a trip to Alaska via Canada and was told I couldn't even transport my guns thru your country! Had to Fed X them to a GPO in Fairbanks.
The biggie....the 1st amendment. Yes, it burns my butt (more than jalapenias) to see our flag burned and to see some offensive crap called art and to know that our tax dollars fund some of it or to listen to some loud mouth spew garbage and foul language but, for good or bad, it is a freedom afforded to ALL by the 1st amendment. It's a right. Those who would take away our 2nd amend. use arguments that lump gun owners w/ criminals. We know the difference and we want our rights protected. Those who exercise the 1st amend. probably feel the same about their rights. Each person is entitled to that protection regardless if we find it offensive or not. Tshoes said it all...Arlington is full of crosses so that we may stay free under our constitution and I'll remember that this weekend. Thanks to all.
es mi dos peso's
Jim D <jdekan@neosoft.com>
Humble, Republic of Tejas, USA - Saturday, May 27, 2000 at 18:02:55
(ZULU) (your host address: 209.196.110.28)
Hot Damn, no wonder we argue about everything... I was born in Fort Worth, and grew up on a family ranch in Shiro (pop. 68) that goes back to the Spanish land grant days, and spent some of my mis-spent youth in the Spindle Top Oilfields, as a sulphur monkey.
Your definatly a bum ;))
'lito
Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Saturday, May 27, 2000 at 18:16:51 (ZULU) (your host address:
208.249.180.123)
That MOA theory stuff was cool, just regret I wasn't drinking while reading it. From now on, I will consider myself a .1 MOA shooter shooting a many MOA rifle. I think it will be good for my self-esteem. If anyone says I can't shoot, I will just pull out that there formuleye and tell them to work the numbers...putting me down as a .1 MOA shooter then taking the other known [that being the actual spread], so we can determine how badly the the gun is shooting. Hey, golfers blame a punt into the pond on the clubs all the time, good enough for them, good enough for me.
As for Miller being PC, haha. I gotta remember that one.
Hope everyone is healthy and all is well.
Old Dog [.1 MOA, and practicing]
Bruce <Bruce@mannlawfirm.com>
USA - Saturday, May 27, 2000 at 18:22:11 (ZULU) (your host address:
208.16.162.10)
All,
If a guy wanted to set up a flat-topped, heavy-barrelled AUG as
an intermidiate range precision rifle, should he put a nice Leupold, ACOG
or something similar on it. I read the the bolt/semi gun debate here as
it comes up and am knowledgable enough to understand the 5.56 does not
have the wind bucking ability out far, hence the use of the words "intermidiate
range".
God Bless Our Veterans
Thanks in advance,
JFW
Jack Wilson <jackwilson@anglefire.com>
Ft. Worth, TX, USA - Saturday, May 27, 2000 at 22:07:16 (ZULU) (your
host address: 24.4.254.161)
My thunderstick seems like it shoots better groups at longer ranges
than the closer ones. (ie holds about an 1" at 100 yards and about the
same 200 yards) I have shot groups at ranges going out to 700 yards and
shoot well under MOA, but for some reason it's not happening at 100 yards.
Useing federal gold match 175g ammo. The rifle is Savage 110FP in a .308
win. Is this the weapon or operator? If it is me tell how to fix it so
I can shoot a tiny little group at 100 yards. Well it's time to go babysit
the convited felons that call my place of employment home:)
Stagger 10-42
Stagger <Lmcpher104@aol.com>
Terre Haute, IN, USA - Sunday, May 28, 2000 at 00:17:00 (ZULU) (your
host address: 205.188.196.28)
Bravo, you've got plenty of time to make a ghillie by the time the Storm school and competition roll around. Desert BDUs make a fine base.
For your stainless steel barrel, there's a really easy fix: the high-heat resistant flat black barbeque grill refinishing spray paint will match your military finish and serve as a bottom coat for your cammy job.
Kev: sorry to hear Customs and Excise or the carrier has "Lost" your rifle (and you don't have any control over how it's getting broken in. Honest, I don't have it!).
Steve, you watched last year (I think we even met at the motel). You gotta shoot this year. If you really are planning on shooting in the nationals this year let me know -- I'll be going up with Team Virginia and there's usually always some room in the huts.
Dave Liwanag <dliwanag@mgfairfax.rr.com>
USA - Sunday, May 28, 2000 at 00:35:15 (ZULU) (your host address: 24.163.112.159)
(SMTC '99 trainup and Carlos II match)...'Chainsaw'.... hmmm....
the way I looked at it regarding stalking was - crawl thru the worst area
that was available. Where we minimized the chances of running into someone
else. I personally grew to like the briars... really lets me find out how
good a friend you were (Ha!).
Another thing I found out by going thru the briars - is that your
ghillie (at least mine did) will acquire natural vegetation as you crawl
thru... :)
Remember me getting busted for crossing that open trail... I to this
day can't figure out why I tried that..... guess I thought "Well geez if
I move reeeeeeeeaaaaaaallllllll slow - I won't get detected..
Hey - I was there to learn and learn I did - and loved every minute
of it... can't wait for the next course.
All: Enjoy your memorial weekend and God Bless our fallen comrades
Ken :)
Ken <Ken@Hunters.org>
Nokesville, Va, USA - Sunday, May 28, 2000 at 01:05:48 (ZULU) (your
host address: 207.233.164.10)
Heimler <moparjohn@home.com>
USA - Sunday, May 28, 2000 at 01:38:59 (ZULU) (your host address: 24.4.252.102)
"I sought for the greatness and genius of America in her commodious harbors and her ample rivers, and it was not there; in her fertile fields and prairies, and it was not there; in her rich mines and her vast world commerce, and it was not there. Not until I went to the churches of America and heard her pulpits aflame with righteousness did I understand the secret of her genius and power. America is great because she is good and if America ever ceases to be good, America will cease to be great." -- Alexis de Tocqueville
I wanted to remember where this country used to be and the sacrifices of those that have served this country providing our freedom at Concorde to those that have served protecting our freedom. May God bless all of you that have served. I will remember all of you Monday - but I know my history and think of all of you everyday. I just pray that we don't fulfill another phrase...
"Those that don't learn from their past, are doomed to repeat it.
Heimler
Heimler <moparjohn@home.com>
USA - Sunday, May 28, 2000 at 01:40:08 (ZULU) (your host address: 24.4.252.102)
Any ideas?
Bolt <reeldoctor@mindspring.com>
USA - Sunday, May 28, 2000 at 02:48:33 (ZULU) (your host address: 209.138.184.227)
Check with Richard Carroll - the owner of Southern Gun Works in Suffolk
Va. Shop number: 757.934.1423. He tells me that he was a close personal
friend of Carlos.
Anyhow, the artist Wooten - did that print of Carlos at the edge
of the rice paddies - the one with the Marines Rifle Creed on it at the
bottom.
Of those - 1000 were signed by Carlos. After Carlos passed away
- Wooten took 10 of those and put I.M. (In Memory of...) in pencil above
Carlos's signature. I bought two of them - I'll bet he has some more of
the prints with Carlos's signature - might even have one of the I.M.'d
ones as well.
Good Luck,
Ken :)
Ken <Ken@Hunters.org>
Nokesville, Va, USA - Sunday, May 28, 2000 at 03:02:23 (ZULU) (your
host address: 207.233.164.10)
My next Black Diamond scope will be a 6x-24x mil dot for my .300 Win.Mag. H.S.Precision target rifle to replace my current 6x-18x Burris Fulfield.
Regards, Eric Blumensaadt
Eric Blumensaadt <ericblumensaadt@aol.com>
USA - Sunday, May 28, 2000 at 03:44:27 (ZULU) (your host address: 205.188.193.161)
I have created havok on this board and I did not have any intension of doing that.
I guess that you will not know the circumstances of the situation until you have lived out in BFE, South Texas, alone with your wife and baby with no support available. (Hell, I even bought one of the fellows lunch at the local diner while waiting for the BP.)
I will keep my questions and comment on releavent subject material from now on. Again, I am truely sorry for causing trouble here.
I do have a problem on my new 700, however. While adjusting the trigger,
via Pablito's directions, I screwed up somewhere. I have a 3 lb trigger
now but it has a gritty take up. I think the trigger and the_______ (horseshoe
shaped thing that it indexes with, not the sear as I know it) grate against
one another. It feels like crap! If there is anyone here who would care
to help (Pablito?) I would sure appreciate it.
Zed Stewart <zhdstew@nts-online.net>
panhandle of, TEXAS, USA - Sunday, May 28, 2000 at 04:57:44 (ZULU)
(your host address: 216.167.136.47)
The 6x42 Kahles is a good match to the AUG Flat top,they make a 5.56mm
cam for it,or a S/H German Army scope,the small 4x24 scope that mount's
on the G-3,has a focus knob,and a cam for 7.62(you could remark it for
5.56)they cost around $250 USD from Germany.
Chris
Chris <cafarr@excite.com>
New Zealand - Sunday, May 28, 2000 at 07:26:16 (ZULU) (your host address:
203.97.45.166)
http://www.destinygrp.com/index2.html
I have no affiliation with those guys nor do I possess any knowledge as to what they do apart from the info they offer on their website.
It might prove to be an interesting place to start investigating options and alternatives for anybody who might be interested.
Regards,
Ares
AresP <ares@ezo.net>
Canton, OH, USA - Sunday, May 28, 2000 at 09:40:06 (ZULU) (your host
address: 24.93.224.68)
Well said, and accepted. Welcome to the site.
Get a can of spray gun cleaner, like "REm Clean".
Take the trigger out of the gun, and carefully remove the large lever,
(it's chrome, and holds back the firing pin, and will "want" to come out,
there's a spring under it). Spray the whole trigger, and "Wash it out"!!.
Wipe off the large lever, so there's no crud in it.
Re-assemble the trigger, and put a small drop of oil in the pin
that the trigger pivots on, but DON'T slobber oil over the trigger, it
just collects more grit.
If you are not comfortable with taking the trigger apart, then remove the bolt, and (using the long plastic snoot on the RemClean), spray down into the trigger from the top, going through the ejection port, and let the fluid flow out the bottom... flood it!!... a bunch!!
Let it dry, and put a small drop on the pins.
If this doesn't do it, then drop me an e-mail, and we'll get you
through it.
Bravo...
Dude-skie... you bought the wrong MK4-M3! You got the VERY, VERY
long range model... closest shot is about 450yds, but you're "good to go"
out to 3 miles... let your spotter take the close ones... she needs the
practice. (I'll swap you for a "normal" Tasco! ;)
If it's on your raggedy-assed M1A, loosen the mount. Make sure that the rear attachment point is clean, and has no burrs, and when you attach it, that the faces are as close as possible. When you re-tighten the main bolt, rotate the mount clockwise HARD, to take up all the accumulated slack, and tighten it down. Then tighten the the front "ring screw" down well. This should give you about 20 thou more elevation than you had (unless you already did this)... if it's not enuff, then some file work is needed. You can put a few layers of tape in the bottom of your front scope ring, until after the course.
'lito (Going birding for the weekend!)
Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Sunday, May 28, 2000 at 12:15:31 (ZULU) (your host address: 208.249.180.12)
thanks;
Andrew
Andrew <mysig@fast.net>
Broomall, PA, USA - Sunday, May 28, 2000 at 14:31:43 (ZULU) (your host
address: 209.92.92.179)
tshoes, FYI--- The quote "I disagree with what you say, but I will
defend to the death your right to say it." is attributed
to a French guy named Voltaire. Notice that I didn't say
Frenchman;.) Sounds like it could have been one of our
forefathers, however.
To everyone, Have a happy and safe Memorial Day!
Al S.
Al Simon <asimon@gj.net>
Palisade, Colorado, USA - Sunday, May 28, 2000 at 14:46:08 (ZULU) (your
host address: 216.169.65.19)
'lito
Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Sunday, May 28, 2000 at 15:22:16 (ZULU) (your host address: 208.249.180.46)
(Jeez, I'll never get out of here!). Every time I've been told that someone had seen this effect (large groups at close range, and smaller groups at long range)... it has been parallex.
Take a hypothetical case where the gun shoots 2" groups at 100yds,
and 1.5" sroups at 200yds.
When you consider, for that to happen, the bullet would have to
leave in the wrong direction by 1/60th of a degree, and somehow know it's
going in the wrong direction, turn back to get "intersect" the sight line,
and make another turn to follow the sight line.
And each bullet, which started in a different direction than the
others, would have to find it's way back the the sight line, then correct
it self a second time, to fly with all the others???
No Way, fuzzy Jose'.
Take any gun that shows "Sleeping bullet syndrome", and fix it so the gun and barrel can't move, and shoot a group at close range, and put another target at long range, and you will see the sleeping effect is gone.
Many scopes show parallex at close range, and many shooters don't know how to see it, or correct it... in spite of their belief that they can.
Many people have "seen" this effect, and assumed it must be the bullet going to sleep, but if you think about what it would take for 10 bullets that left the barrel, all in different dirrections, with a 1/60th degree error, and find their way back, you will see it can't happen without a guidance system.
A fellow posted here last year about his rifle doing this very same thing, and we e-mailed a few times, he learned how to over ride the built in paralllex in his scopeand "Poof" the "Sleeping bullet syndrome" disappeared...
Now I'm outta here till Monday night... bird hunting (North American Birdus, long leggus, delicious;)
Remember why we have this weekend, guys.
'lito
Pablito <condor@mags.net>
USA - Sunday, May 28, 2000 at 17:54:45 (ZULU) (your host address: 208.249.180.46)
Zed: cool enough by me. Welcome aboard, you know though that NOBODY ever leaves "the roaster" (evil laugh, and no, the A is not a typo). They just lurk like we all used to.
To everyone that sent me e-mail on correcting my scope, thanks. I've
tried some, gonna try more, and of course it's a great excuse to shoot
the thing. "Uh, honey, but these guys said I HAVE to". Maybe the 1/2 MOA
was a fluke (doubt it though) but I've got several 3/4 MOA groups (400
yards) this morning, until the wind and mirage sent me home. See Mike,
you gots your work a-cut out for ya!
Bravo <Bravo762@yahoo.com>
Finding it hard to shoot while grinning so big in the, USA - Sunday,
May 28, 2000 at 18:00:07 (ZULU) (your host address: 209.180.85.162)
The other is Parallex will do you at close range as well as long
range. I have also seen this happen.
MikeMIller <Tactical@tacticalintervention.com>
Calif, USA - Sunday, May 28, 2000 at 18:54:31 (ZULU) (your host address:
148.165.83.143)
Pete - not so worried about the PT aspect, just my shooting
John - who's liberating who?
Dave, Customs doesn't have it, the broker screwed up, I'll have more info Monday (please,please,please)
Mike - ditto on the spell check, if I'm thinking (rarely) I cut and paste from MS word.
Kevin <kevmich@cadvision.com>
Canada - Sunday, May 28, 2000 at 19:12:01 (ZULU) (your host address:
207.148.141.63)
Don't worry about the shooting aspect, JUST COME! I guarantee that your learning curve will be unbelievable.
The chance to meet a buncha really nice folks that share the same interest as you and chat with some of the High Zen Masters like Dave (You're out of time and Incomplete)Liwanag, Kent, Rick, Rod & staff at S/M, fellow Rosterfarians, and such notable characters as Bruce Robinson and Dave Rolls(UnDude being a Girly Man this year and NOT ATTENDING because of the taunting bout his Girlie Ghillie and whatever the current IM OUTTA VACATION time.... excuse is),
Laugh like a madman at me during the "Bass Stalking" in the field,
or just throwing back a couple "owed cold ones" with the guys in
a wholesome friendly atmosphere while Laughing at 'Lito stalking sheep
at Lucy's Sheepdip cafe. BirdWatching MY weasel ass HA!
Zed,
Now that you're in the club you gotta come too and bring Bravo.
Chao!
Chao!
peteR <PNGREIFF@AOL.COM>
Rain City, By-GaWd, USA - Sunday, May 28, 2000 at 22:49:47 (ZULU) (your
host address: 205.188.200.23)